Reaction of a 6-dimethylaminopentafulvene with the Mes2PCH2CH2B(C6F5)2 frustrated Lewis pair

The frustrated Lewis pair Mes(2)PCH(2)CH(2)B(C(6)F(5))(2) reacts readily with 6-dimethylamino-6-methylfulvene at room temperature to yield the trans-1-[B(C(6)F(5))(2)]-2-[CH(2)CH(2)PMes(2)] disubstituted fulvene derivative 9 that features an internal N-B contact. Thermolysis (80 °C in toluene) results in a complete isomerization to the respective 1-[B(C(6)F(5))(2)]-3-[CH(2)CH(2)PMes(2)] isomer 10. Both compounds were characterized by using X-ray diffraction. A reaction scheme is formulated to rationalize the specific formation of these compounds, involving a retro-hydroboration/hydroboration sequence. The reaction of the 6-dimethylaminofulvene with HB(C(6)F(5))(2) yielded the corresponding parent compound 13 that was also characterized by X-ray diffraction.     

Steric and electronic effects on the heterolytic H2‐splitting by phosphine‐boranes R3B/PR′3 (R = C6F5, Ph; R′ = C6H2Me3, tBu,Ph, C6F5, Me,H): A computational study

The steric and electronic effects exerted by the substituents R/R′ on the heterolytic H₂‐splitting by phosphine‐boranes R₃B/PR′₃ [R = C₆F₅ ( 1 ), Ph ( 2 ); R′ = C₆H₂Me₃ ( a ), tBu ( b ), Ph ( c ), C₆F₅ ( d ), Me ( e ), H ( f )] have been studied by performing quantum mechanical density functional theory and RI‐MP2 calculations. Energy decomposition analyses based on the block‐localized wavefunction method show that the nature of the interaction between R₃B and PR′₃ is strongly dependent on the B? P distance. With short B? P distances (～2.1 Å), the strength of Lewis pairs results from the balance among various energy terms, and both strong and weak dative bonds can be found in this group. However, at long B? P distances (>4.0 Å), the correlation and dispersion energy (ΔE_corr) dominates. In other words, the van der Waals (vdW) interaction rules these weakly bound complexes. No ion‐pair structures of 1f and 2c – 2f can be located as they instantly converge to vdW complexes R₃B···H₂···PR′₃. We thus propose a model, which predicts that when the sum (E_hp) of the hydride affinity (HA) of BR₃ and the proton affinity (PA) of PR′₃ is higher than 340.0 kcal/mol, the ion‐pair [R₃BH^?][HPR′] can be observed, whereas with E_hp below this value, the ion pair would instantly undergo the combination of proton and hydride with the release of H₂. The overall reaction energies ( 1a – 1e and 2a – 2b ) can be best described by a fitting equation with HA(BR₃), PA(PR′₃), and the binding energy ΔE_b(BR₃/PR′₃) as predictor variables: ΔE_R([R₃BH^?][HPR′]) = ?0.779HA(BR₃) ? 0.695PA(PR′₃) ? 1.331 ΔE (BR₃/PR′₃) + 245.3 kcal/mol. The fitting equation provides quantitative insights into the steric and electronic effects on the thermodynamic aspects of the heterolytic H₂‐splitting reactions. The electronic effects are reflected by HA(BR₃) and PA(PR′₃), and ΔE_b can be significantly influenced by the steric overcrowding. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Quantum Chem, 2011     

Reaction of an “Invisible” Frustrated N/B Lewis Pair with Dihydrogen

D ‐(+)‐Camphor forms the enamine 2 with piperidine. Compound 2 adds HB(C₆F₅)₂ at the enamine carbon atom C3 to form a Lewis acid/Lewis base adduct (exo‐/endo‐isomers of 3 ). Exposure of 3 to dihydrogen (2.5 bar, room temperature) leads to heterolytic splitting of H₂ to form the H⁺/H^? addition products ( 4 , two diastereoisomers) of the “invisible” frustrated Lewis pairs ( 5 , two diastereoisomers) that were apparently generated in situ by enamine hydroboration under equilibrium conditions.     

Hydroboration as an Efficient Tool for the Preparation of Electronically and Structurally Diverse N→B‐Heterocycles

Ladder‐type organoboranes featuring intramolecular N→B coordination have been prepared through hydroboration of a 2‐(ortho‐styryl)pyridine ( PhPy ) with a series of hydroboranes, including 9H‐9‐borabicyclo[3.3.1]nonyl (9H‐BBN), BH₃ ? THF, HBCl₂ ? SMe₂, HB(C₆F₅)₂, and a 9H‐9‐borafluorene derivative. The hydroboration reaction results in highly regioselective borylation under mild conditions and gives the products in good to excellent yields. The molecular structure and electronic properties of the obtained boranes have been experimentally investigated in detail, and complemented with DFT calculations to further elucidate the origin of differences in optical and electronic properties. The electron affinity of the conjugated system can be controlled through variation of the borane, while the optical properties are likewise directly linked to the type and molecular structure of the substituents on boron. The broad substrate range shows that this preparative approach is widely applicable to introduce chemically diverse boryl groups into conjugated systems.     

Diverse Activation Modes in the Hydroboration of Aldehydes and Ketones with Germanium,Tin, and Lead Lewis Pairs

Intramolecular germylene, stannylene, and plumbylene Lewis pairs were reacted with hexanal and yielded the cyclic addition products only with the germanium and tin reagents. In further reactivity studies, the hydroboration of aldehydes and ketones catalyzed by intramolecular germylene, stannylene, and plumbylene Lewis pairs was studied. In the case of the cyclic germylene Lewis pair, the product of the oxidative addition of pinacolborane at the germylene moiety was observed. According to stoichiometric as well as catalytic experiments, the intramolecular germylene Lewis pair acts as a catalyst in the hydroboration of aldehydes and ketones. The homologous stannylene Lewis pair forms a reactive tin hydride during the catalysis, which can also act as a catalyst in this transformation.     

New Ga/N‐based Active Lewis Pairs,Trifunctional Ga–Ga Compounds,Reactions with Cyanamide and Dual Insertion of Isocyanate

Hydrogallation of Me₃Si–C≡C–NR'₂ with R₂Ga–H (R = tBu, CH₂tBu, iBu) yielded Ga/N‐based active Lewis pairs, R₂Ga–C(SiMe₃)=C(H)–NR'₂ ( 7 ). The Ga and N atoms adopt cis‐positions at the C=C bonds and show weak Ga–N interactions. tBu₂GaH and Me₃Si–C≡C–N(C₂H₄)₂NMe afforded under exposure of daylight the trifunctional digallium(II) compound [MeN(C₂H₄)₂N](H)C=C(SiMe₃)Ga(tBu)–Ga(tBu)C(SiMe₃)=C(H)[N(C₂H₄)₂NMe] ( 8 ), which results from elimination of isobutene and H₂ and Ga–Ga bond formation. 8 was selectively obtained from the ynamine and [tBu(H)Ga–Ga(H)tBu]₂[HGatBu₂]₂. 7a (R = tBu; NR'₂ = 2,6‐Me₂NC₅H₈) and H₈C₄N–C≡N afforded the adduct tBu₂Ga‐C(SiMe₃)=C(H)(2,6‐Me₂NC₅H₈) · N≡C–NC₄H₈ ( 11 ) with the nitrile bound to gallium. The analogous ALP with harder Al atoms yielded an adduct of the nitrile dimer or oligomers of the nitrile at room temperature. The reaction of 7a with Ph–N=C=O led to the insertion of two NCO groups into the Ga–C_vinyl bond to yield a GaOCNCN heterocycle with Ga bound to O and N atoms ( 12 ).     

Facile Modulation of FLP Properties: A Phosphinylvinyl Grignard Reagent and Ga/P‐ and In/P2‐Based Frustrated Lewis Pairs

An Al/P‐based frustrated Lewis pair (FLP) reacted with PhMgCl by an unexpected transmetalation and formation of a phosphinylvinyl Grignard reagent. This compound is well suited for the transfer of the basic FLP component to other Lewis acidic metal atoms and allowed the generation of a Ga/P and an In/P₂ FLP. The Ga FLP showed a behavior different to that of the corresponding Al FLP, the In FLP allowed the chelating coordination of an Au atom by Au−Cl bond activation.     

Boron Lewis Acid‐Catalyzed Hydroboration of Alkenes with Pinacolborane: BArF3 Does What B(C6F5)3 Cannot Do!

The transition‐metal‐free hydroboration of various alkenes with pinacolborane (HBpin) initiated by tris[3,5‐bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]borane (BAr^F₃) is reported. The choice of the boron Lewis acid is crucial as the more prominent boron Lewis acid tris(pentafluorophenyl)borane (B(C₆F₅)₃) is reluctant to react. Unlike B(C₆F₅)₃, BAr^F₃ is found to engage in substituent redistribution with HBpin, resulting in the formation of Ar^FBpin and the electron‐deficient diboranes [H₂BAr^F]₂ and [(Ar^F)(H)B(μ‐H)₂BAr^F₂]. These in situ‐generated hydroboranes undergo regioselective hydroboration of styrene derivatives as well as aliphatic alkenes with cis diastereoselectivity. Another ligand metathesis of these adducts with HBpin subsequently affords the corresponding HBpin‐derived anti‐Markovnikov adducts. The reactive hydroboranes are regenerated in this step, thereby closing the catalytic cycle.     

Cooperative Lewis Pairs Based on Late Transition Metals: Activation of Small Molecules by Platinum(0) and B(C6F5)3

A Lewis basic platinum(0)–CO complex supported by a diphosphine ligand and B(C₆F₅)₃ act cooperatively, in a manner reminiscent of a frustrated Lewis pair, to activate small molecules such as hydrogen, CO₂, and ethene. This cooperative Lewis pair facilitates the coupling of CO and ethene in a new way.     

Functionalization of Intramolecular Frustrated Lewis Pairs by 1,1‐Carboboration with Conjugated Enynes

The vicinal P/B frustrated Lewis pair (FLP) Mes₂PCH₂CH₂B(C₆F₅)₂ undergoes 1,1‐carboboration reactions with the Me₃Si‐substituted enynes to give ring‐enlarged functionalized C₃‐bridged P/B FLPs. These serve as active FLPs in the activation of dihydrogen to give the respective zwitterionic [P]H⁺/[B]H^? products. One such product shows activity as a metal‐free catalyst for the hydrogenation of enamines or a bulky imine. The ring‐enlarged FLPs contain dienylborane functionalities that undergo “bora‐Nazarov”‐type ring‐closing rearrangements upon photolysis. A DFT study had shown that the dienylborane cyclization of such systems itself is endothermic, but a subsequent C₆F₅ migration is very favorable. Furthermore, substituted 2,5‐dihydroborole products are derived from cyclization and C₆F₅ migration from the photolysis reaction. In the case of the six‐membered annulation product, a subsequent stereoisomerization reaction takes place and the resultant compound undergoes a P/B FLP 1,2‐addition reaction with a terminal alkyne with rearrangement.     

Activation of SO2 by N/Si+ and N/B Frustrated Lewis Pairs: Experimental and Theoretical Comparison with CO2 Activation

The guanidine 1,5,7-triazabicyclo[4.4.0]dec-5-ene (TBD) and the substituted derivatives [TBD–SiR₂]⁺ and TBD–BR₂ reacted with SO₂ to give different FLP–SO₂ adducts. Molecular structures, elucidated by X-ray diffraction, showed some structural similarities with the analogous CO₂ adducts. Thermodynamic stabilities were both experimentally evidenced and computed through DFT calculations. The underlying parameters governing the relative stabilities of the different SO₂ and CO₂ adducts were discussed from a theoretical standpoint, with a focus on the influence of the Lewis acidic moiety.     

The Hydride‐Ion Affinity of Borenium Cations and Their Propensity to Activate H2 in Frustrated Lewis Pairs

A range of frustrated Lewis pairs (FLPs) containing borenium cations have been synthesised. The catechol (Cat)‐ligated borenium cation [CatB(PtBu₃)]⁺ has a lower hydride‐ion affinity (HIA) than B(C₆F₅)₃. This resulted in H₂ activation being energetically unfavourable in a FLP with the strong base PtBu₃. However, ligand disproportionation of CatBH(PtBu₃) at 100 °C enabled trapping of H₂ activation products. DFT calculations at the M06‐2X/6‐311G(d,p)/PCM (CH₂Cl₂) level revealed that replacing catechol with chlorides significantly increases the chloride‐ion affinity (CIA) and HIA. Dichloro–borenium cations, [Cl₂B(amine)]⁺, were calculated to have considerably greater HIA than B(C₆F₅)₃. Control reactions confirmed that the HIA calculations can be used to successfully predict hydride‐transfer reactivity between borenium cations and neutral boranes. The borenium cations [Y(Cl)B(2,6‐lutidine)]⁺ (Y=Cl or Ph) form FLPs with P(mesityl)₃ that undergo slow deprotonation of an ortho‐methyl of lutidine at 20 °C to form the four‐membered boracycles [(CH₂{NC₅H₃Me})B(Cl)Y] and [HPMes₃]⁺. When equimolar [Y(Cl)B(2,6‐lutidine)]⁺/P(mesityl)₃ was heated under H₂ (4 atm), heterolytic cleavage of dihydrogen was competitive with boracycle formation.     

Bis[N,N′‐diisopropylbenzamidinato(−)]silicon(II): Lewis Acid/Base Reactions with Triorganylboranes

Reaction of the donor‐stabilized silylene 1 (which is three‐coordinate in the solid state and four‐coordinate in solution) with BEt₃ and BPh₃ leads to the formation of the Lewis acid/base complexes 2 and 3 , respectively, which are the first five‐coordinate silicon compounds with an Si?B bond. These compounds were structurally characterized by crystal structure analyses and by multinuclear NMR spectroscopic studies in the solid state and in solution. Additionally, the bonding situation in 2 and 3 was analyzed by quantum chemical studies.     

A Germylene/Borane Lewis Pair and the Remarkable C=O Bond Cleavage Reaction toward Isocyanate and Ketone Molecules

A germylene/borane Lewis pair ( 2 ) was prepared from a 1,1‐carboboration of amidinato phenylethynylgermylene ( 1 ) by B(C₆F₅)₃. Compound 2 reacted with iPrNCO and (4‐MeOC₆H₄)C(O)Me, respectively, with cleavage of the C=O double bond. In the first instance, O and iPrNC insert separately into the Ge?B bond to yield a GeBC₂O‐heterocycle ( 3 ) and a GeBC₃‐heterocycle ( 4 ). In the second case (4‐MeOC₆H₄)(Me)C inserts into the Ge?N bond of 2 while O is incorporated in the Ge?B bond to form a Ge‐centered spiroheterocycle ( 5 ). The reaction of 2 with tBuNC to give 6 , which has almost the same structure as 4 , proved the formation of the isonitrile during transformation from 2 and iPrNCO to 3 and 4 . The kinetic study of the reaction of 2 and iPrNCO gave evidence of proceeding through a GeBC₃O‐heterocycle intermediate. In addition, a DFT study was performed to elucidate the reaction mechanism.     

Photo‐promoted Skeletal Rearrangement of Phosphine–Borane Frustrated Lewis Pairs Involving Cleavage of Unstrained C−C σ‐Bonds

An unprecedented photo‐promoted skeletal rearrangement reaction of phosphine–borane frustrated Lewis pairs, o‐(borylaryl)phosphines, involving cleavage of an unstrained sp²C–sp³C σ‐bond is reported. The reaction realizes an efficient synthesis of cyclic phosphonium borate compounds. The reaction mechanism via a boranorcaradiene intermediate is proposed based on theoretical calculations. This work sheds light on the new photoreactivity of phosphine–borane FLPs.