Heterobimetallische phosphanido-verbrückte Zweikern-Komplexe - Synthese von cis-rac-[(η-C5H4R)2Zr{μ-PH(2,4,6−iPr3C6H2)}2M(CO)4] (RMe,MCr,Mo; RH,MMo)

Heterobimetallic Phosphanido-bridged Dinuclear Complexes - Syntheses of cis-rac-[(η-C₅H₄R)₂Zr{μ-PH(2,4,6-ⁱPr₃C₆H₂)}₂M(CO)₄] (R?Me, M?Cr, Mo; R?H, M?Mo) The zirconocene bisphosphanido complexes [(η-C₅H₄R)₂Zr{PH(2,4,6-ⁱPr₃C₆H₂)}₂] (R?Me, H) react with [(NBD)M(CO)₄] (NBD?norbornadiene, M?Cr, Mo) to give only one diastereomer of the phosphanido-bridged heterobimetallic dinuclear complexes cis-rac-[(η-C₅H₄R)₂Zr{μ-PH(2,4,6-ⁱPr₃C₆H₂)}₂M(CO)₄] [R?Me, M?Cr ( 1 ), Mo ( 2 ); R?H, M?Mo ( 3 )]. However, no reaction was observed between [(η-C₅H₅)₂Zr{PH(2,4,6-^tBu₃ C₆H₂)}₂] and [Pt(PPh₃)₄]. 1—3 were characterised spectroscopically. For 1—3 , the presence of the racemic isomer was shown by NMR spectroscopy. No reaction was observed at room temperature for 3 and CS₂, (NO)BF₄, Me₃NO or PH(2,4,6-Me₃C₆H₂)₂. With Et₂AlH or PhC?CH decomposition of 3 was observed.     

Four‐Membered Heterometallacyclic d0 and d1 Complexes of Group 4 Metallocenes with Amidato Ligands

A study of the coordination chemistry of different amidato ligands [(R)N?C(Ph)O] (R=Ph, 2,6‐diisopropylphenyl (Dipp)) at Group 4 metallocenes is presented. The heterometallacyclic complexes [Cp₂M(Cl){κ²‐N,O‐(R)N?C(Ph)O}] M=Zr, R=Dipp ( 1 a ), Ph ( 1 b ); M=Hf, R=Ph ( 2 )) were synthesized by reaction of [Cp₂MCl₂] with the corresponding deprotonated amides. Complex 1 a was also prepared by direct deprotonation of the amide with Schwartz reagent [Cp₂Zr(H)Cl]. Salt metathesis reaction of [Cp₂Zr(H)Cl] with deprotonated amide [(Dipp)N?C(Ph)O] gave the zirconocene hydrido complex [Cp₂M(H){κ²‐N,O‐(Dipp)N?C(Ph)O}] ( 3 ). Reaction of 1 a with Mg did not result in the desired Zr(III) complex but in formation of Mg complex [(py)₃Mg(Cl) {κ²‐N,O‐(Dipp)N?C(Ph)O}] ( 4 ; py=pyridine). The paramagnetic complexes [Cp′₂Ti{κ²‐N,O‐(R)N?C(Ph)O}] (Cp′=Cp, R=Ph ( 7 a ); Cp′=Cp, R=Dipp ( 7 b ); Cp′=Cp*, R=Ph ( 8 )) were prepared by the reaction of the known titanocene alkyne complexes [Cp₂′Ti(η²‐Me₃SiC₂SiMe₃)] (Cp′=Cp ( 5 ), Cp′=Cp* ( 6 )) with the corresponding amides. Complexes 1 a , 2 , 3 , 4 , 7 a , 7 b , and 8 were characterized by X‐ray crystallography. The structure and bonding of complexes 7 a and 8 were also characterized by EPR spectroscopy.     

Reactions of 2‐Substituted Pyridines with Titanocenes and Zirconocenes: Coupling versus Dearomatisation

Reactions of group 4 metallocene sources with 2‐substituted pyridines were investigated to evaluate their coordination type between innocent and reductive dearomatisation as well as to probe the possibility for couplings. A dependence on the cyclopentadienyl ligands (Cp, Cp*), the metals (Ti, Zr), and the substrates (2‐phenyl‐, 2‐acetyl‐, and 2‐iminopyridine) was observed. While 2‐phenylpyridine is barely reactive, 2‐acetylpyridine reacts vigorously with the Cp‐substituted complexes and selectively with their Cp* analogues. With 2‐iminopyridine, in all cases selective reactions were observed. In the isolated [Cp₂Ti], [Cp₂Zr], and [Cp*₂Zr] compounds the substrate coordinates by its pyridyl ring and the unsaturated side‐chain. Subsequently, the pyridine was dearomatised, which is most pronounced in the [Cp*₂Zr] compounds. Using [Cp*₂Ti] leads to the unexpected paramagnetic complexes [Cp*₂Ti^III(N,O‐acpy)] and [Cp*₂Ti^III(N,N′‐impy)]. This highlights the non‐innocent character of the pyridyl substrates.     

Reactions of Group 4 Metallocene Complexes with Mono‐ and Diphenylacetonitrile: Formation of Unusual Four‐ and Six‐Membered Metallacycles

Reactions of Group 4 metallocene alkyne complexes [Cp′₂M(η²‐Me₃SiC₂SiMe₃)] ( 1 : M=Zr, Cp′=Cp*=η⁵‐pentamethylcyclopentadienyl; 2 a : M=Ti, Cp′=Cp*, and 2 b : M=Ti, Cp′₂=rac‐(ebthi)=rac‐1,2‐ethylene‐1,1′‐bis(η⁵‐tetrahydroindenyl)) with diphenylacetonitrile (Ph₂CHCN) and of the seven‐membered zirconacyclocumulene 3 with phenylacetonitrile (PhCH₂CN) were investigated. Different compounds were obtained depending on the metal, the cyclopentadienyl ligand and the reaction temperature. In the first step, Ph₂CHCN coordinated to 1 to form [Cp*₂Zr(η²‐Me₃SiC₂SiMe₃)(NCCHPh₂)] ( 4 ). Higher temperatures led to elimination of the alkyne, coordination of a second Ph₂CHCN and transformation of the nitriles to a keteniminate and an imine ligand in [Cp*₂Zr(NC₂Ph₂)(NCHCHPh₂)] ( 5 ). The conversion of 4 to 5 was monitored by using ¹H NMR spectroscopy. The analogue titanocene complex 2 a eliminated the alkyne first, which led directly to [Cp*₂Ti(NC₂Ph₂)₂] ( 6 ) with two keteniminate ligands. In contrast, the reaction of 2 b with diphenylacetonitrile involved a formal coupling of the nitriles to obtain the unusual four‐membered titanacycle 7 . An unexpected six‐membered fused zirconaheterocycle ( 8 ) resulted from the reaction of 3 with PhCH₂CN. The molecular structures of complexes 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 and 8 were determined by X‐ray crystallography.     

Synthesis and Characterization of Multiferrocenyl‐Substituted Group 4 Metallocene Complexes

The reaction of different metallocene fragments [Cp₂M] (Cp=η⁵‐cyclopentadienyl, M=Ti, Zr) with diferrocenylacetylene and 1,4‐diferrocenylbuta‐1,3‐diyne is described. The titanocene complexes form the highly strained three‐ and five‐membered ring systems [Cp₂Ti(η²‐FcC₂Fc)] ( 1 ) and [Cp₂Ti(η⁴‐FcC₄Fc)] ( 2 ) (Fc=[Fe(η⁵‐C₅H₄)(η⁵‐C₅H₅)]) by addition of the appropriate alkyne or diyne to Cp₂Ti. Zirconocene precursors react with diferrocenyl‐ and ferrocenylphenylacetylene under C? C bond coupling to yield the metallacyclopentadienes [Cp₂Zr(C₄Fc₄)] ( 3 ) and [Cp₂Zr(C₄Fc₂Ph₂)] ( 5 ), respectively. The exchange of the zirconocene unit in 3 by hydrogen atoms opens the route to the super‐crowded ferrocenyl‐substituted compound tetraferrocenylbutadiene ( 4 ). On the other hand, the reaction of 1,4‐diferrocenylbuta‐1,3‐diyne with zirconocene complexes afforded a cleavage of the central C? C bond, and thus, dinuclear [{Cp₂Zr(μ‐η¹:η²‐C?CFc)}₂] ( 6 ) that consists of two zirconocene acetylide groups was formed. Most of the complexes were characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray crystallography, showing attractive multinuclear molecules. The redox properties of 3 , 5 , and 6 were studied by cyclic voltammetry. Upon oxidation to 3 ⁿ⁺, 5 ⁿ⁺, and 6 ⁿ⁺ (n=1–3), decomposition occured with in situ formation of new species. The follow‐up products from 3 and 5 possess two or four reversible redox events pointing to butadiene‐based molecules. However, the dinuclear complex 6 afforded ethynylferrocene under the measurement conditions.     

Latest News: Reactions of Group 4 Bis(trimethylsilyl)acetylene Metallocene Complexes and Applications of the Obtained Products

Recently published reactions of group 4 metallocene bis(trimethylsilyl)acetylene (btmsa) complexes from the last two years are reviewed. Complexes like Cp’₂Ti(η²-Me₃SiC₂SiMe₃) and Cp₂Zr(py)(η²-Me₃SiC₂SiMe₃) with Cp’ as Cp (cyclopentadienyl) and Cp* (pentamethylcyclopentadienyl) have been considered (py=pyridine). These complexes can liberate a reactive low-valent titanium or zirconium center by dissociation of the ligands and act as ‘‘masked’’ M^II complexes (M=Ti, Zr). They represent excellent sources for the clean generation of the reactive coordinatively and electronically unsaturated complex fragments [Cp’₂M]. This is the reason why they were used for many synthetic and catalytic reactions during the last years. As an update to several review articles on this topic, this contribution provides an update with recent examples of preparative organometallic and organic chemistry of these complexes, acting as reagents for a wide range of coordinating and coupling reactions. In addition, applications and investigations concerning reaction products derived from this chemistry are mentioned, too.     

Katalysatordesaktivierungen bei der Acetylen-Polymerisation mit Titanocen- bzw. Zirconocen-Komplexen des Bis(trimethylsilyl)acetylens

Desactivation of Catalysts in the Polymerization of Acetylene by Bis(trimethylsilyl)acetylene Complexes of Titanocene or Zirconocene Unexpected inactive byproducts were observed in the catalytic polymerization of acetylene using metallocene alkyne complexes Cp₂M(L)(η²-Me₃SiC₂SiMe₃), 1 : M = Ti, without L; 2 : M = Zr, L = thf. The reaction of 1 was investigated in detail by NMR to give quantitatively at –20 °C the titanacyclopentadiene Cp₂Ti–CH=CH–C(SiMe₃)=C(SiMe₃) ( 3 ). Around 0 °C 3 starts to rearrange to yield the dihydroindenyl complex 4 via coupling of one Cp-ligand with the titanacyclopentadiene. In the reaction of 2 under analogous conditions a zirconacyclopentadiene Cp₂Zr–CH=CH–C(SiMe₃)=C(SiMe₃) ( 5 ) and the dimeric complex [Cp₂Zr(C(SiMe₃)=CH(SiMe₃)]₂[μ-σ(1,2)-C≡C] ( 6 ) were observed. Whereas 5 decomposes to a mixture of unidentified paramagnetic species, 6 was isolated and investigated by NMR spectroscopy and X-ray analysis. In the reaction of rac-(ebthi)Zr(η²-Me₃SiC₂SiMe₃) (ebthi = ethylenbistetrahydroindenyl) with 2-ethynyl-pyridine the complex rac-(ebthi)ZrC(SiMe₃)=CH(SiMe₃)](σ-C≡CPy) 7 was obtained, which was investigated by an X-ray analysis.     

E4 Transfer (E=P,As) to Ni Complexes

The use of [Cp′′₂Zr(η^1:1-E₄)] (E=P ( 1 a ), As ( 1 b ), Cp′′=1,3-di-tert-butyl-cyclopentadienyl) as phosphorus or arsenic source, respectively, gives access to novel stable polypnictogen transition metal complexes at ambient temperatures. The reaction of 1 a/1 b with [Cp^RNiBr]₂ (Cp^R=Cp^Bn (1,2,3,4,5-pentabenzyl-cyclopentadienyl), Cp′′′ (1,2,4-tri-tert-butyl-cyclopentadienyl)) was studied, to yield novel complexes depending on steric effects and stoichiometric ratios. Besides the transfer of the complete E_n unit, a degradation as well as aggregation can be observed. Thus, the prismane derivatives [(Cp′′′Ni)₂(μ,η^3:3-E₄)] ( 2 a (E=P); 2 b (E=As)) or the arsenic containing cubane [(Cp′′′Ni)₃(μ₃-As)(As₄)] ( 5 ) are formed. Furthermore, the bromine bridged cubanes of the type [(Cp^RNi)₃{Ni(μ-Br)}(μ₃-E)₄]₂ (Cp^R=Cp′′′: 6 a (E=P), 6 b (E=As), Cp^R=Cp^Bn: 8 a (E=P), 8 b (E=As)) can be isolated. Here, a stepwise transfer of E_n units is possible, with a cyclo-E₄²⁻ ligand being introduced and unprecedented triple-decker compounds of the type [{(Cp^RNi)₃Ni(μ₃-E)₄}₂(μ,η^4:4-E′₄)] (Cp^R=Cp^Bn, Cp′′′; E/E′=P, As) are obtained.     

Interaction of the Negishi reagent Cp2ZrBun 2 with 1,4-bis(tert-butyl)butadiyne

The interaction of the Negishi reagent Cp₂ZrBuⁿ ₂ with 1,4-bis(tert-butyl)butadiyne Bu^tC≡C-C≡CBu^t leads to four products: a five-membered zirconacyclocumulene complex Cp₂Zr(η⁴-Bu^tC₄Bu^t) (2) synthesized earlier by another method, the previously unknown seven-membered zirconacyclocumulene Cp₂Zr[η⁴-Bu^tC₄(Bu^t)-C(C₂Bu^t)=CBu^t] (3) as well as small amounts of the zirconocene binuclear butatrienyl complex Cp₂(Buⁿ)Zr(Bu^tC₄Bu^t)Zr(Buⁿ)Cp₂ (4), and the dimeric acetylide [Cp₂ZrC≡CBu^t]₂ (5). The structure of complexes 2–5 was established by X-ray diffraction studies.     

Activation of biscyclopentadienyl hydride complexes of titanium and aluminum by NH- and OH-acids in the reactions of hydrogenation of olefins. Crystal and molecular structures of {(η5−Cp)2Ti(μ−H)2AlH]μ−N(C2H4)4O]}2 and [(η5−Cp)2Ti(μ−H(2AlH]2(μ−OC2H4OMe)[(μ1:μ5−C5H4)Ti(μ5−Cp)(μ−H)]2*

The reactions of Cp₂TiH₂AlH₂·Et₂O (1) with HN(C₂H₄)₂O, HOC₂H₄OMe, and water afforded the complexes {Cp₂TiH₂AlH[μ-N(C₂H₄)₂O]}₂ (5), [Cp₂TiH₂AlH(μ-OC₂H₄OMe)]₂ (6) and (Cp₂TiH₂AlH)₂O (4), respectively. Compounds 5 and 6 are dimers containing bridging Al?E₂?Al fragments (E=N or O). Complex 6 in solution converted to the hexanuclear compound [(η⁵?Cp)₂Ti(μ?H(₂AlH]₂(μ?OC₂H₄OMe)[(μ¹:μ⁵?C₅H₄)Ti(μ⁵?Cp)(μ?H)]₂ (8). The structures of complexes 5 and 8 were established by X-ray diffraction analysis. The rates of hydrogenation of hex-1-ene were determined using compounds 4–6 and the complexes [Cp₂TiH₂AlH(NEt₂)]₂ and [Cp₂TiH₂AlH(OEt)]₂ as catalysts. The probable mechanism of hydrogenation with the participation of bimetallic hydride complexes of aluminum and titanocene is discussed.     

Insight into Oxide‐Bridged Heterobimetallic Al/Zr Olefin Polymerization Catalysts

Reaction of (TBBP)AlMe ? THF with [Cp*₂Zr(Me)OH] gave [(TBBP)Al(THF)?O?Zr(Me)Cp*₂] (TBBP=3,3’,5,5’‐tetra‐tBu‐2,2'‐biphenolato). Reaction of [DIPPnacnacAl(Me)?O?Zr(Me)Cp₂] with [PhMe₂NH]⁺[B(C₆F₅)₄]^? gave a cationic Al/Zr complex that could be structurally characterized as its THF adduct [(DIPPnacnac)Al(Me)?O?Zr(THF)Cp₂]⁺[B(C₆F₅)₄]^? (DIPPnacnac=HC[(Me)C=N(2,6‐iPr₂?C₆H₃)]₂). The first complex polymerizes ethene in the presence of an alkylaluminum scavenger but in the absence of methylalumoxane (MAO). The adduct cation is inactive under these conditions. Theoretical calculations show very high energy barriers (ΔG=40–47 kcal mol^?1) for ethene insertion with a bridged AlOZr catalyst. This is due to an unfavorable six‐membered‐ring transition state, in which the methyl group bridges the metal and ethene with an obtuse metal‐Me‐C angle that prevents synchronized bond‐breaking and making. A more‐likely pathway is dissociation of the Al‐O‐Zr complex into an aluminate and the active polymerization catalyst [Cp*₂ZrMe]⁺.     

Synthesis, structure and ethylene polymerization behavior of titanium phosphinoamide complexes

(Phosphinoamide)(cyclopentadienyl)titanium(IV) complexes of the type Cp*TiCl₂(η²-Ph₂PNR) [Cp*=C₅Me₅; R = t-Bu (2a), R = n-Bu (2b), R = Ph (2c)] have been prepared by the reaction of Cp*TiCl₃ with the corresponding lithium phosphinoamides. The structure of Cp*TiCl₂(η²-Ph₂PN^tBu) (2a) and Cp*TiCl₂(η²-Ph₂PNPh) (2c) have been determined by X-ray crystallography. These complexes exhibited moderate catalytic activities for ethylene polymerization in the presence of modified methylaluminoxane (MMAO). Catalytic activity of up to 2.5 × 10⁶ g/(mol Ti h) was observed when activated by i-Bu₃Al/Ph₃CB(C₆F₅)₄.     

Heterometall-Komplexe mit E6-Liganden (E = P,As)

Heterometallic Complexes with E₆ Ligands (E = P, As) The reaction of [Cp*Co(μ-CO)]₂ 1 with the sandwich complexes [Cp*Fe(η⁵-E₅)] 2 a: E = P, 2 b: E = As in decalin at 190°C affords besides [CpCo₂E₄] 4: E = P, 7: E = As and [CpFe₂P₄] 5 the trinuclear complexes [(Cp*Fe)₂(Cp*Co)(μ-η²-P₂)(μ₃-η^1:2:1-P₂)₂] 3 as well as [(Cp*Fe)₂(Cp*Co)(μ₃-η^2:2:2-As₃)₂] 6 . With [Mo(CO)₅(thf)] 3 and 6 form in a build-up reaction the tetranuclear clusters [(Cp*Fe)₂(Cp*Co)E₆{Mo(CO)₃}] 10: E = P, 11: E = As. 3, 6 and 11 have been further characterized by an X-ray crystal structure determination.     

Reactions of Group 4 Metallocenes with Monosubstituted Acetonitriles: Keteniminate Formation versus CC Coupling

The reactions of the Group 4 metallocene dichlorides [Cp′₂MCl₂] ( 1 a : M=Ti, Cp′=Cp*=η⁵‐pentamethylcyclopentadienyl, 1 b : M=Zr, Cp′=Cp=η⁵‐cyclopentadienyl) with lithiated MesCH₂?C?N gave [Cp*₂TiCl(N=C=C(HMes))] ( 3 ; Mes=mesityl) in the case of 1 a . For compound 1 b , a nitrile–nitrile coupling resulted in a five‐membered bridge in 4 . The reaction of the metallocene alkyne complex [Cp*₂Zr(η²‐Me₃SiC₂SiMe₃)] ( 2 ) with PhCH₂?C?N led in the first step to the unstable product [Cp*₂Zr(η²‐Me₃SiC₂SiMe₃)(NC?CH₂Ph)] ( 5 ). After the elimination of the alkyne, a mixture of products was formed. By variation of the solvent and the reaction temperature, three compounds were isolated: a diazadiene complex 6 , a bis(keteniminate) complex 7 , and 8 with a keteniminate ligand and a five‐membered metallacycle. Subsequent variation of the Cp ligand and the metal center by using [Cp₂Zr] and [Cp*₂Ti] with Me₃SiC₂SiMe₃ in the reactions with PhCH₂?C?N gave complex mixtures.     

Highly Strained Heterometallacycles of Group 4 Metallocenes with Bis(diphenylphosphino)amide Ligands

A study regarding coordination chemistry of the bis(diphenylphosphino)amide ligand Ph₂P‐N‐PPh₂ at Group 4 metallocenes is presented herein. Coordination of N,N‐bis(diphenylphosphino)amine ( 1 ) to [(Cp₂TiCl)₂] (Cp=η⁵‐cyclopentadienyl) generated [Cp₂Ti(Cl)P(Ph₂)N(H)PPh₂] ( 2 ). The heterometallacyclic complex [Cp₂Ti(κ²‐P,P‐Ph₂P‐N‐PPh₂)] ( 3 Ti ) can be prepared by reaction of 2 with n‐butyllithium as well as from the reaction of the known titanocene–alkyne complex [Cp₂Ti(η²‐Me₃SiC₂SiMe₃)] with the amine 1 . Reactions of the lithium amide [(thf)₃Li{N(PPh₂)₂}] with [Cp₂MCl₂] (M=Zr, Hf) yielded the corresponding zirconocene and hafnocene complexes [Cp₂M(Cl){κ²‐N,P‐N(PPh₂)₂}] ( 4 Zr and 4 Hf ). Reduction of 4 Zr with magnesium gave the highly strained heterometallacycle [Cp₂Zr(κ²‐P,P‐Ph₂P‐N‐PPh₂)] ( 3 Zr ). Complexes 2 , 3 Ti , 4 Hf , and 3 Zr were characterized by X‐ray crystallography. The structures and bondings of all complexes were investigated by DFT calculations.     

Insertion Reactions of Neutral Phosphidozirconocene Complexes as a Convenient Entry into Frustrated Lewis Pair Territory

Neutral phosphidozirconocene complexes [Cp₂Zr(PR₂)Me] (Cp=cyclopentadienyl; 1a : R=cyclohexyl (Cy); 1b : R=mesityl (Mes); 1c : R=tBu) undergo insertion into the Zr?P bond by non‐enolisable carbonyl building blocks (O=CR′R′′), such as benzophenone, aldehydes, paraformaldehyde or CO₂, to give [Cp₂Zr(OCR′R′′PR₂)Me] ( 3 – 7 ). Depending on the steric bulk around P, complexes 3 – 7 react with B(C₆F₅)₃ to give O‐bridged cationic zirconocene dimers that display typical frustrated Lewis pair (FLP)/ambiphilic ligand behaviour. Thus, the reaction of {[Cp₂Zr(μ‐OCHPhPCy₂)][MeB(C₆F₅)₃]}₂ ( 10a ) with chalcone results in 1,4 addition of the Zr⁺/P FLP, whereas the reaction of {[Cp₂Zr(μ‐OCHFcPCy₂)][MeB(C₆F₅)₃]}₂ ( 11a ; Fc=(C₅H₄)CpFe) with [Pd(η³‐C₃H₅)Cl]₂ yields the unique Zr?Fe?Pd trimetallic complex 13a , which has been characterised by XRD analysis.     

2,5-Dimethylthiophene coordination to three metal centers in the complexes (η4, S-μ3-2,5-Me2T)(IrCp*) [M(CO)2Cp]2 where MMo or W

The 2,5-dimethylthiophene (2,5-Me₂T) ligand in the isomers Cp*Ir(η⁴-2,5-Me₂T) (1) and Cp*Ir(C,S-2,5-Me₂T) (2) is activated to react with the dimers Cp(CO)₂M?M(CO)₂Cp[M?Mo (3), W (4)] to give complexes (5,6) in which the thiophene is coordinated to three metals. Oxidation of 5 with Cp₂Fe⁺ removes the Mo dimer to give Cp*Ir(η⁵-2,5-Me₂T)²⁺. Reaction of 5 with CO displaces the Mo as [CpMo(CO)₃]₂ to give Cp*Ir(CO)(C,S-2,5-Me₂T) (7). Ultraviolet photolysis of 1 provides a convenient route to the ring-opened isomer 2. Despite the remarkable nature of the thiophene coordination in 5 and 6, its reactivity does not suggest new pathways that would lead to the hydrodesulfurization of thiophenes.     

A General Pathway to Heterobimetallic Triple-Decker Complexes

A systematic study on the reactivity of the triple-decker complex [(Cp’’’Co)₂(μ,η⁴:η⁴-C₇H₈)] ( A ) (Cp’’’=1,2,4-tritertbutyl-cyclopentadienyl) towards sandwich complexes containing cyclo-P₃, cyclo-P₄, and cyclo-P₅ ligands under mild conditions is presented. The heterobimetallic triple-decker sandwich complexes [(Cp*Fe)(Cp’’’Co)(μ,η⁵:η⁴-P₅)] ( 1 ) and [(Cp’’’Co)(Cp’’’Ni)(μ,η³:η³-P₃)] ( 3 ) (Cp*=1,2,3,4,5-pentamethylcyclopentadienyl) were synthesized and fully characterized. In solution, these complexes exhibit a unique fluxional behavior, which was investigated by variable temperature NMR spectroscopy. The dynamic processes can be blocked by coordination to {W(CO)₅} fragments, leading to the complexes [(Cp*Fe)(Cp’’’Co)(μ₃,η⁵:η⁴:η¹-P₅){W(CO)₅}] ( 2 a ), [(Cp*Fe)(Cp’’’Co)(μ₄,η⁵:η⁴:η¹:η¹-P₅){(W(CO)₅)₂}] ( 2 b ), and [(Cp’’’Co)(Cp’’’Ni)(μ₃,η³:η²:η¹-P₃){W(CO)₅}] ( 4 ), respectively. The thermolysis of 3 leads to the tetrahedrane complex [(Cp’’’Ni)₂(μ,η²:η²-P₂)] ( 5 ). All compounds were fully characterized using single-crystal X-ray structure analysis, NMR spectroscopy, mass spectrometry, and elemental analysis.     

Iodination of cyclo‐E5‐Complexes (E=P,As)

In a high‐yield one‐pot synthesis, the reactions of [Cp*M(η⁵‐P₅)] (M=Fe ( 1 ), Ru ( 2 )) with I₂ resulted in the selective formation of [Cp*MP₆I₆]⁺ salts ( 3 , 4 ). The products comprise unprecedented all‐cis tripodal triphosphino‐cyclotriphosphine ligands. The iodination of [Cp*Fe(η⁵‐As₅)] ( 6 ) gave, in addition to [Fe(CH₃CN)₆]²⁺ salts of the rare [As₆I₈]^2? (in 7 ) and [As₄I₁₄]^2? (in 8 ) anions, the first di‐cationic Fe‐As triple decker complex [(Cp*Fe)₂(μ,η^5:5‐As₅)][As₆I₈] ( 9 ). In contrast, the iodination of [Cp*Ru(η⁵‐As₅)] ( 10 ) did not result in the full cleavage of the M?As bonds. Instead, a number of dinuclear complexes were obtained: [(Cp*Ru)₂(μ,η^5:5‐As₅)][As₆I₈]_0.5 ( 11 ) represents the first Ru‐As₅ triple decker complex, thus completing the series of monocationic complexes [(Cp^RM)₂(μ,η^5:5‐E₅)]⁺ (M=Fe, Ru; E=P, As). [(Cp*Ru)₂As₈I₆] ( 12 ) crystallizes as a racemic mixture of both enantiomers, while [(Cp*Ru)₂As₄I₄] ( 13 ) crystallizes as a symmetric and an asymmetric isomer and features a unique tetramer of {AsI} arsinidene units as a middle deck.     

(1,3-Diformylindenyl)cyclopentadienyl ruthenium derivatives

The reaction of [CpRu(CH₃CN)₃][PF₆], [Cp*RuCl] _n , and [Cp^FRuCl]n with 1,3-diformylindene results in the predominant formation of zwitter-ionic arene-cyclopentadienyl complexes {η⁶-1,3-(CHO)₂C₉H₅}RuCp (Cp = C₅H₅), {η⁶-1,3-(CHO)₂C₉H₅}RuCp* (Cp* = C₅Me₅), and {η⁶-1,3-(CHO)₂C₉H₅}RuCp^F (Cp^F = C₅Me₄CF₃), respectively. The ruthenocenes {η⁵-1,3-(CHO)₂C₉H₅}RuCp, {η⁵-1,3-(CHO)₂C₉H₅}RuCp*, and {η⁵-1,3-(CHO)₂C₉H₅}RuCpF were synthesized by the reaction of 1,3-diformylindenyl potassium with [CpRu(CH₃CN)₃][PF₆], [Cp*RuCl] _n , and [Cp^FRuCl] _n .