Necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence and ɛ-uniqueness of bounded solutions of the equation x′ = f(x) − h(t)

We introduce the notion of ?-unique bounded solution to the nonlinear differential equation x′ = f(x) ? h(t), where f: ? → ? is a continuous function and h(t) is an arbitrary continuous function bounded on ?. We derive necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence and ?-uniqueness of bounded solutions to this equation.     

On oscillation and nonoscillation of general functional differential equations

Oscillation and nonoscillation criteria for the nth order nonlinear functional differential equation L_nx(t) + f(t, x(t), x[g(t)]) = h(t) are established. Some illustrative examples are also included.     

Parameter Dependence of Stable Manifolds for Nonuniform (μ, ν)-dichotomies

We construct stable invariant manifolds for semiflows generated by the nonlinear impulsive differential equation with parameters x'= A(t)x + f(t, x, λ), t≠τi and x(τ+i) = Bix(τi) + gi(x(τi), λ), i ∈ N in Banach spaces, assuming that the linear impulsive differential equation x'= A(t)x, t≠τi and x(τ+i) = Bix(τi), i ∈ N admits a nonuniform (μ, ν)-dichotomy. It is shown that the stable invariant manifolds are Lipschitz continuous in the parameter λ and the initial values provided that the nonlinear perturbations f, g are sufficiently small Lipschitz perturbations.     

On a nonconvolution Volterra resolvent

Under fairly weak assumptions, the solutions of the system of Volterra equations x(t) = ∝₀^ta(t, s) x(s) ds + f(t), t > 0, can be written in the form x(t) = f(t) + ∝₀^tr(t, s) f(s) ds, t > 0, where r is the resolvent of a, i.e., the solution of the equation r(t, s) = a(t, s) + ∝₀^ta(t, v) r(v, s)dv, 0 < s < t. Conditions on a are given which imply that the resolvent operator f ∝₀^tr(t, s) f(s) ds maps a weighted L¹ space continuously into another weighted L¹ space, and a weighted L^∞ space into another weighted L^∞ space. Our main theorem is used to study the asymptotic behavior of two differential delay equations.     

Periodic behavior of a nonlinear third order vibrating system

A theorem is proved to show that the third order differential equation x^‴+f(t,x,x^′,x^″)=0 has nontrivial solutions characterized by x^′(0)=x^′(τ)=0 when x,x^′,x^″ and f(t,x,x^′,x^″) are bounded. A second condition is introduced to prove the existence of periodic solution for this equation. It is shown that the equation has a τ-periodic solution if f(t,x,x^′,x^″) is an even function with respect to x^′. The existence and periodicity conditions would be applied to third order systems such as viscoelastic mechanical vibration isolator system. The concepts of Green’s function and the Schauder’s fixed-point theorem have been used for proving the third-order-existence theorem.     

A lower bound for the first eigenvalue of an elliptic operator

Oscillatory behavior of the solutions of the nth-order delay differential equation L_nx(t) + q(t)f(x[g(t)]) = 0 is discussed. The results obtained are extensions of some of the results by Kim (Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.62 (1977), 77–82) for y⁽ⁿ⁾ + py = 0.     

Periodic solutions of semilinear equations of evolution of compact type

The existence of solutions in a weak sense of x′ + (A + B(t, x))x = f(t, x), x(0) = x(T) is established under the conditions that A generates a semigroup of compact type on a Hilbert space H; B(t,x) is a bounded linear operator and f(t, x) a function with values in H; for each square integrable ?(t) the problem with B(t, ?(t)) and f(t, ?(t)) in place of B(t, x) and f(t, x) has a unique solution; and B and f satisfy certain boundedness and continuity conditions.     

Oscillation theorems for second-order nonlinear differential equations with damped term

Several oscillation criteria are given for the second-order damped nonlinear differential equation (a(t)[y′(t)]^σ′i +p(t)[y′(t)]^σ +q(t)f(y(t)) = 0, where σ > 0 is any quotient of odd integers, a ϵ C(R, (0, ∞)), p(t) and q(t) are allowed to change sign on [t_o, ∞), and f ϵ Cl (R, R) such that xf (x) > 0 for x≠0. Our results improve and extend some known oscillation criteria. Examples are inserted to illustrate our results.     

Oscillatory and asymptotic behavior of solutions of differential equations with deviating arguments

The oscillatory and asymptotic behavior of solutions of a class of nth order nonlinear differential equations, with deviating arguments, of the form (E, δ) L_nx(t) + δq(t) f(x[g₁(t)],…, x[g_m(t)]) = 0, where δ = ± 1 and L₀x(t) = x(t), L_kx(t) = a_k(t)(L_{k ? 1}x(t))^., $\text{k = 1, 2,…, n (}{}^{\mathrm{.}}\text{=}\text{d}\text{dt}\text{)}$, is examined. A classification of solutions of (E, δ) with respect to their behavior as t → ∞ and their oscillatory character is obtained. The comparisons of (E, 1) and (E, ?1) with first and second order equations of the form y^.(t) + c₁(t) f(y[g₁(t)],…, y[g_m(t)]) = 0 and (a_{n ? 1}(t)z^.(t))^. ? c₂(t) f(z[g₁(t)],…, z[g_m(t)]) = 0, respectively, are presented. The obtained results unify, extend and improve some of the results by Graef, Grammatikopoulos and Spikes, Philos and Staikos.     

On oscillation of solutions of higher order forced functional differential inequalities

Oscillation criteria for the class of forced functional differential inequalities x(t){L_nx(t) + f(t, x(t), x[g₁(t)],…, x[g_m(t)]) ? h(t)} ? 0, for n even, and x(t){L_nx(t) ? f(t, x(t), x[g₁(t)],…, x[g_m(t)]) ? h(t)} ? 0, for n odd, are established.     

Differential inequalities and flow-invariance via linear functionals

This paper deals with flow-invariance properties with respect to x′ ? f(t, x) and resulting comparison inequalities. Both the order relation “?” and the regularity conditions on x are defined, in a general manner, in terms of a specified set of linear functionals, S. This permits greater flexibility for applications e.g., a proper choice of S gives the PDE operators of the form f(t, x) = x_ss + qx_s where p ? 0, an appropriate quasimonotonicity property.     

Stable manifolds for semi-linear evolution equations and admissibility of function spaces on a half-line

Consider an evolution family U=(U(t,s))_t?s?0 on a half-line R₊ and a semi-linear integral equation . We prove the existence of stable manifolds of solutions to this equation in the case that (U(t,s))_t?s?0 has an exponential dichotomy and the nonlinear forcing term f(t,x) satisfies the non-uniform Lipschitz conditions: ‖f(t,x₁)−f(t,x₂)‖?φ(t)‖x₁−x₂‖ for φ being a real and positive function which belongs to admissible function spaces which contain wide classes of function spaces like function spaces of Lp type, the Lorentz spaces Lp,q and many other function spaces occurring in interpolation theory.     

Invariant manifolds of admissible classes for semi-linear evolution equations

Consider an evolution family U=(U(t,s))_t?s?0 on a half-line R₊ and a semi-linear integral equation . We prove the existence of invariant manifolds of this equation. These manifolds are constituted by trajectories of the solutions belonging to admissible function spaces which contain wide classes of function spaces like function spaces of Lp type, the Lorentz spaces Lp,q and many other function spaces occurring in interpolation theory. The existence of such manifolds is obtained in the case that (U(t,s))_t?s?0 has an exponential dichotomy and the nonlinear forcing term f(t,x) satisfies the non-uniform Lipschitz conditions: ‖f(t,x₁)−f(t,x₂)‖?φ(t)‖x₁−x₂‖ for φ being a real and positive function which belongs to certain classes of admissible function spaces.     

Limit-point type solutions of nonlinear differential equations

We are concerned with the nonexistence of L²-solutions of a nonlinear differential equation x″=a(t)x+f(t,x). By applying technique similar to that exploited by Hallam [SIAM J. Appl. Math. 19 (1970) 430-439] for the study of asymptotic behavior of solutions of this equation, we establish nonexistence of solutions from the class L²(t₀,∞) under milder conditions on the function a(t) which, as the examples show, can be even square integrable. Therefore, the equation under consideration can be classified as of limit-point type at infinity in the sense of the definition introduced by Graef and Spikes [Nonlinear Anal. 7 (1983) 851-871]. We compare our results to those reported in the literature and show how they can be extended to third order nonlinear differential equations.     

A pointwise abelian Ergodic theorem for Lp semigroups, 1 ⩽ p < ∞

Let (X, ∑, μ) be a σ-finite measure space and L_p(μ) = L_p(X, ∑, μ), 1 ? p ? ∞, the usual Banach spaces of complex-valued functions. Let {T_t: t ? 0} be a strongly continuous semigroup of positive L_p(μ) operators for some 1 ? p < ∞. Denote by R_λ the resolvent of {T_t}. We show that f?L_p(μ) implies λR_λf(x) → f(x) a.e. as λ → ∞.     

A tracing of the fractional temperature field

This paper is devoted to a study of L~q-tracing of the fractional temperature field u(t, x)—the weak solution of the fractional heat equation(?_t +(-?_x)~α)u(t, x) = g(t, x) in L~p(R_+~(1+n)) subject to the initial temperature u(0, x) = f(x) in L~p(R~n).     

Functional differential equations and nonlinear semigroups in Lp-spaces

The autonomous nonlinear functional differential equation x(t) = F(x_t), t ? 0, x₀ = φ is studied as a semigroup of nonlinear operators in L_p function spaces. The method employed is to construct a semigroup of nonlinear operators which may be associated with the solutions of this equation. New existence and stability results are obtained for this equation by means of the semigroup approach.     

Periodic solutions of a nonlinear second-order differential equation with deviating argument

With the help of the coincidence degree continuation theorem, the existence of periodic solutions of a nonlinear second-order differential equation with deviating argument

x^″(t)+f₁(x(t))x^′(t)+f₂(x(t))(x^′(t)⁾²+g(x(t−τ(t)))=0,     

On the asymptotic behavior of the solutions of a class of second order nonlinear differential equations

In this paper, we investigate properties of the solutions of a class of second-order nonlinear differential equation such as [p(t)f(x(t))x′(t)]′ + q(t)g(x′(t))e(x(t)) = r(t)c(x(t)). We prove the theorems of monotonicity, nonoscillation and continuation of the solutions of the equation, the sufficient and necessary conditions that the solutions of the equation are bounded, and the asymptotic behavior of the solutions of the equation when t → ∞ on condition that the solutions are bounded. Also we provide the asymptotic relationship between the solutions of this equation and those of the following second-order linear differential equation: [p(t)u′(t)]′ = r(t)u(t)     

Oscillation of solutions of second-order neutral delay differential equations with integrable coefficients

Some necessary conditions are established for the nonoscillation of solutions of the second-order neutral delay differential equation [a(t)(x (t) + p(t)x(t − τ)′]′ + q(t)f(x(t − σ)) = 0. Using these results, we obtain some oscillation criteria for the above equation.