Synthesis of poly(styrene‐block‐tert‐butyl acrylate) star polymers by atom transfer radical polymerization and micellization of their hydrolyzed polymers

A series of poly(styrene‐block‐tert‐butyl acrylate) heteroatom star block copolymers having various block lengths were prepared by atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP), using an “as synthesized” cynurate modified trifunctional initiator. The structure of the star polymers was confirmed by the characterization of the individual arms resulting from hydrolysis. Amphiphilic poly(styrene‐block‐acrylic acid) star copolymers were further synthesized by hydrolyzing PtBA blocks using anhydrous trifluoroacetic acid. The characterization data are reported from analyses using gel permeation chromatography, infrared, ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectroscopies. The stable micelle solution was prepared by dialyzing the solution of these polymers in N,N‐dimethylformamide against deionized water. The temperature‐induced associating behavior of these amphiphilic star polymers were studied using dynamic laser light scattering spectroscopy. The hydrodynamic diameter of both micelles and unassociated chains were obtained in the same solution using light scattering cumulant's calculation method. The homogeneity and the size distribution of the micelle population in the solution were determined using centrifuge/sedimentation particle size distribution analyzer. Field emission scanning electron microscope was used to visualize the size of the micelles formed and the micellar aggregates. The influence of the temperature on the viscosity of the micelle solution was studied using an Ubbelohde viscometer. Thermodynamics of micellization of these block copolymers were also investigated. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 43: 6367–6378, 2005     

Synthesis and supramolecular self‐assembly of thermosensitive amphiphilic star copolymers based on a hyperbranched polyether core

A novel amphiphilic thermosensitive star copolymer with a hydrophobic hyperbranched poly (3‐ethyl‐3‐(hydroxymethyl)oxetane) (HBPO) core and many hydrophilic poly(2‐(dimethylamino) ethyl methacrylate) (PDMAEMA) arms was synthesized and used as the precursor for the aqueous solution self‐assembly. All the copolymers directly aggregated into core–shell unimolecular micelles (around 10 nm) and size‐controllable large multimolecular micelles (around 100 nm) in water at room temperature, according to pyrene probe fluorescence spectrometry and ¹H NMR, TEM, and DLS measurements. The star copolymers also underwent sharp, thermosensitive phase transitions at a lower critical solution temperature (LCST), which were proved to be originated from the secondary aggregation of the large micelles driven by increasing hydrophobic interaction due to the dehydration of PDMAEMA shells on heating. A quantitative variable temperature NMR analysis method was designed by using potassium hydrogen phthalate as an external standard and displayed great potential to evaluate the LCST transition at the molecular level. The drug loading and temperature‐dependent release properties of HBPO‐star‐PDMAEMA micelles were also investigated by using indomethacin as a model drug. The indomethacin‐loaded micelles displayed a rapid drug release at a temperature around LCST. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 46: 668–681, 2008     

Synthesis of star polymers via nitroxide mediated free‐radical polymerization: A “core‐first” approach using resorcinarene‐based alkoxyamine initiators

The synthesis of new octafunctional alkoxyamine initiators for nitroxide‐mediated radical polymerization (NMRP), by the derivatization of resorcinarene with nitroxide free radicals viz TEMPO and a freshly prepared phosphonylated nitroxide, is described. The efficiency of these initiators toward the controlled radical polymerization of styrene and tert‐butyl acrylate is investigated in detail. Linear analogues of these multifunctional initiators were also prepared to compare and evaluate their initiation efficiency. The favorable conditions for polymerization were optimized by varying the concentration of initiators and free nitroxides, reaction conditions, etc., to obtain well‐defined star polymers. Star polystyrene thus obtained were further used as macro‐initiator for the block copolymerization with tert‐butyl acrylate. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 45: 5559–5572, 2007     

Synthesis and characterization of fluorescently labeled core cross‐linked star polymers

A series of fluorescently labeled core cross‐linked star (CCS) polymers were synthesized via the “arm‐first” approach, employing atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) to control the resulting architecture. The initiator p‐toluenesulfonyl chloride (TsCl) was used to synthesize “living” poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) macroinitiator, which was subsequently cross‐linked to generate the CCS polymers. Divinylbenzene (DVB) was used as the cross‐linker and 7‐[4‐(trifluoromethyl)coumarin] methacrylamide ( F₁ , λ_ex = 343 nm) was added as a fluorescent labeling monomer. A range of PMMA/DVB/ F₁ based CCS polymers were synthesized with the core domain made selectively fluorescent by using varying amounts of monomer F₁ . The core functionalized stars were characterized using gel permeation chromatography (GPC) equipped with multi‐angle laser light scattering (MALLS), refractive index (RI), and UV–visible detectors. The fluorescence quantum yield (Φ_F) and the amount of fluorescent monomer incorporated into the core were quantified by UV–visible and fluorescence spectrophotometry. It was recognized that the overall molecular weights of the stars produced, along with their core molecular weight, decreased as the mol % of monomer F₁ was increased relative to cross‐linker. Visual confirmation of F₁ incorporation was obtained by fluorescence microscopy of thin polymer films cast on glass substrates. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 46: 2422–2432, 2008     

Synthesis of well‐defined cyclodextrin‐core star polymers

The synthesis of 21‐arm methyl methacrylate (MMA) and styrene star polymers is reported. The copper (I)‐mediated living radical polymerization of MMA was carried out with a cyclodextrin‐core‐based initiator with 21 independent discrete initiation sites: heptakis[2,3,6‐tri‐O‐(2‐bromo‐2‐methylpropionyl]‐β‐cyclodextrin. Living polymerization occurred, providing well‐defined 21‐arm star polymers with predicted molecular weights calculated from the initiator concentration and the consumed monomer as well as low polydispersities [e.g., poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), number‐average molecular weight (M_n) = 55,700, polydispersity index (PDI) = 1.07; M_n = 118,000, PDI = 1.06; polystyrene, M_n = 37,100, PDI = 1.15]. Functional methacrylate monomers containing poly(ethylene glycol), a glucose residue, and a tert‐amine group in the side chain were also polymerized in a similar fashion, leading to hydrophilic star polymers, again with good control over the molecular weight and polydispersity (M_n = 15,000, PDI = 1.03; M_n = 36,500, PDI = 1.14; and M_n = 139,000, PDI = 1.09, respectively). When styrene was used as the monomer, it was difficult to obtain well‐defined polystyrene stars at high molecular weights. This was due to the increased occurrence of side reactions such as star–star coupling and thermal (spontaneous) polymerization; however, low‐polydispersity polymers were achieved at relatively low conversions. Furthermore, a star block copolymer consisting of PMMA and poly(butyl methacrylate) was successfully synthesized with a star PMMA as a macroinitiator (M_n = 104,000, PDI = 1.05). © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 39: 2206–2214, 2001     

Entropic effects in mixed micelles formed by star/linear and star/star AB copolymers

The entropic effects in the comicellization behavior of amphiphilic AB copolymers differing in chain architecture of solvophilic A or solvophobic B parts are studied by means of molecular dynamics simulations. In particular, we studied linear/star and star/star copolymer mixtures. The properties of interest were the critical micelle concentration, the mean aggregation number, the shape of the micelle, which is expressed by the shape anisotropy, the thickness of the corona, and the solvophobic core radius. We found that the critical micelle concentration values for linear/star and copolymer mixtures show a positive deviation from the analytical predictions of the molecular theory of comicellization for chemically identical copolymers. This could be attributed to the effective interactions between copolymers originated from the architectural asymmetry. The effective interactions induce a small decrease in the aggregation number of preferential micelles in linear/star mixtures triggering the nonrandom mixing between the solvophilic moieties in the corona for all mixtures. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys. 2015 , 53, 442–452     

Organosoluble star polymers from a cyclodextrin core

Well‐defined star polymers were synthesized with a combination of the core‐first method and atom transfer radical polymerization. The control of the architecture of the macroinitiator based on β‐cyclodextrin bearing functional bromide groups was determined by ¹³C NMR, fast atom bombardment mass spectrometry, and elemental analysis. In a second step, the polymerization of the tert‐butyl acrylate monomer was optimized to avoid a star–star coupling reaction and allowed the synthesis of a well‐defined organosoluble polymer star. The determination of the macromolecular dimensions of these new star polymers by size exclusion chromatography/light scattering was in agreement with the structure of armed star polymers in a large range of predicted molecular weights. This article describes a new approach to polyelectrolyte star polymers by postmodification of poly(tert‐butyl acrylate) by acrylic arm hydrolysis in a water‐soluble system. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 43: 5186–5194, 2005     

Stimuli-responsive star polymers

Stimuli-responsive star polymers gain more and more interest over the last decades due to their unique properties compared to their linear counterparts. The branched structure for instance has influence on the responsive behavior of these polymers. This review offers an overview of stimuli-responsive star polymers generated by different polymerization techniques, e.g. anionic and controlled radical polymerization (CRP). Beside conventional branched homopolymers different other types like block copolymers, miktoarm star copolymers, core crosslinked star polymers (CCS) and comb polymers are also presented. Furthermore their responsive behavior in solution or immobilized on a substrate, and their applications are outlined. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2013, 51, 2980–2994     

Self‐assembly of well‐defined amphiphilic polymeric miktoarm stars,dendrons, and dendrimers in water: The effect of architecture

Five polymeric architectures with a systematic increase in architectural complexity were synthesized by “click” reactions from a toolbox of functional linear polymers and small molecule linkers. The amphiphilic architectures ranged from a simple 3‐miktoarm star block copolymer to the more complex third generation dendrimer‐like block copolymer, consisting of polystyrene (PSTY) and polyacrylic acid (PAA). Micellization of these architectures in water at a pH of 7 under identical ionic strength gave spherical micelles ranging in size from 9 to 30 nm. Subsequent calculations of the PSTY core density, average surface area per PAA arm on the corona‐core interface, and the relative stretching of the PAA arms provided insights into the effect of architecture on the self‐assembly processes. A particular trend was observed that with increased architectural complexity the hydrodynamic diameter, radius of the core in the dry state and the aggregation number also increased with the exception of the third generation dendrimer. On the basis of these observations, we postulate that thermodynamic factors controlling self‐assembly were the entropic penalty of forming PSTY loops in the core counterbalanced by the reduction in repulsive forces through chain stretching. This results in a greater number of aggregating unimers and consequently larger micelle sizes. The junction points within the architecture also play an important role in controlling the self‐assembly process. The G3 dendrimer showed results contradictory to the aforementioned trend. We believe that the self‐assembly process of this architecture was dominated by the increased attractive forces due to stretching of the PSTY core chains to form a more compact core. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 47: 6292–6303, 2009     

Synthesis of polystyrene–poly(tert‐butyl methacrylate)–poly(ethylene oxide) triarm star block copolymers

Three alternative routes, using the heterobifunctional macroinitiator technique, have been developed to obtain polystyrene–poly(tert‐butyl methacrylate)–poly(ethylene oxide) triarm star block copolymers. Only the route showing the reverse initiation of tert‐butyl methacrylate on potassium alkoxide leads to the pure star, whereas the other strategies lead to incomplete initiation because of either an increase in the side reactions, such as transesterification, or a decrease in the accessibility toward bulky catalysts. These limits are linked to the particular location of the initiating group at the junction of the two blocks of the copolymer precursor. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 42: 1745–1751, 2004     

Synthesis of triblock and multiblock methacrylate polymers and self‐assembly of stimuli responsive triblock polymers

Multisegmented poly(methacrylate)s were synthesized using one pot reversible addition fragmentation chain transfer polymerization. Initially, a series of triblock copolymers were synthesized with different ratios of trimethylsilyl methacrylate, di(ethylene oxide) methacrylate, and oligo(ethylene oxide) methacrylate, and different total polymer molecular weights. Additionally, a polymer containing seven distinct blocks of methacrylic monomers was synthesized in one pot. For the triblock copolymers, the trimethylsilyl group was subsequently hydrolyzed, and the self‐assembly of the triblock copolymer was studied in water, under different pH and thermal conditions. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2014 , 52, 2548–2555     

One‐pot synthesis of ABC miktoarm star terpolymers by coupling ATRP,ROP, and click chemistry techniques

We report on the one‐pot synthesis of well‐defined ABC miktoarm star terpolymers consisting of poly(2‐(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate), poly(ε‐caprolactone), and polystyrene or poly(ethylene oxide) arms, PS(‐b‐PCL)‐b‐PDMA and PEO (‐b‐PCL)‐b‐PDMA, taking advantage of the compatibility and mutual tolerability of reaction conditions (catalysts and monomers) employed for atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP), ring‐opening polymerization (ROP), and click reactions. At first, a novel trifunctional core molecule bearing alkynyl, hydroxyl group, and bromine moieties, alkynyl(? OH)? Br, was synthesized via the esterification reaction of 5‐ethyl‐5‐hydroxymethyl‐2,2‐dimethyl‐1,3‐dioxane with 4‐oxo‐4‐(prop‐2‐ynyloxy)butanoic acid, followed by deprotection and monoesterification of alkynyl(? OH)₂ with 2‐bromoisobutyryl bromide. In the presence of trifunctional core molecule, alkynyl(? OH)? Br, and CuBr/PMDETA/Sn(Oct)₂ catalytic mixtures, target ABC miktoarm star terpolymers, PS(‐b‐PCL)‐b‐PDMA and PEO(‐b‐PCL)‐b‐PDMA, were successfully synthesized in a one‐pot manner by simultaneously conducting the ATRP of 2‐(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate (DMA), ROP of ε‐caprolactone (ε‐CL), and the click reaction with azido‐terminated PS (PS‐N₃) or azido‐terminated PEO (PEO‐N₃). Considering the excellent tolerability of ATRP to a variety of monomers and the fast expansion of click chemistry in the design and synthesis of polymeric and biorelated materials, it is quite anticipated that the one‐pot concept can be applied to the preparation of well‐defined polymeric materials with more complex chain architectures. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 47: 3066–3077, 2009     

Synthesis,characterization, and thermal properties of dendrimer‐star,block‐comb copolymers by ring‐opening polymerization and atom transfer radical polymerization

Novel and well‐defined dendrimer‐star, block‐comb polymers were successfully achieved by the combination of living ring‐opening polymerization and atom transfer radical polymerization on the basis of a dendrimer polyester. Star‐shaped dendrimer poly(?‐caprolactone)s were synthesized by the bulk polymerization of ?‐caprolactone with a dendrimer initiator and tin 2‐ethylhexanoate as a catalyst. The molecular weights of the dendrimer poly(?‐caprolactone)s increased linearly with an increase in the monomer. The dendrimer poly(?‐caprolactone)s were converted into macroinitiators via esterification with 2‐bromopropionyl bromide. The star‐block copolymer dendrimer poly(?‐caprolactone)‐block‐poly(2‐hydroxyethyl methacrylate) was obtained by the atom transfer radical polymerization of 2‐hydroxyethyl methacrylate. The molecular weights of these copolymers were adjusted by the variation of the monomer conversion. Then, dendrimer‐star, block‐comb copolymers were prepared with poly(L ‐lactide) blocks grafted from poly(2‐hydroxyethyl methacrylate) blocks by the ring‐opening polymerization of L ‐lactide. The unique and well‐defined structure of these copolymers presented thermal properties that were different from those of linear poly(?‐caprolactone). © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 44: 6575–6586, 2006     

Synthesis and characterization of fluorine‐containing PAA‐b‐PTPFCBPMA amphiphilic block copolymer

A series of perfluorocyclobutyl (PFCB) aryl ether‐based amphiphilic diblock copolymers containing hydrophilic poly(acrylic acid) (PAA) and fluorophilic poly(p‐(2‐(p‐tolyloxy)perfluorocyclobutoxy)phenyl methacrylate) segments were synthesized via successive atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP). 2‐MBP‐initiated and CuBr/N,N,N′,N′,N″‐pentamethyldiethylenetriamine‐catalyzed ATRP homopolymerization of the PFCB‐containing methacrylate monomer, p‐(2‐(p‐tolyloxy)perfluorocyclobutoxy)phenyl methacrylate, can be performed in a controlled mode as confirmed by the fact that the number‐average molecular weights (M_n) increased linearly with the conversions of the monomer while the polydispersity indices kept below 1.38. The block copolymers with narrow molecular weight distributions (M_w/M_n ≤ 1.36) were synthesized by ATRP using Br‐end‐functionalized poly(tert‐butyl acrylate) (PtBA) as macroinitiator followed by the acidolysis of hydrophobic PtBA block into hydrophilic PAA segment. The critical micelle concentrations of the amphiphilic diblock copolymers in different surroundings were determined by fluorescence spectroscopy using N‐phenyl‐1‐naphthylamine as probe. The morphology and size of the micelles were investigated by transmission electron microscopy and dynamic laser light scattering, respectively. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem, 2010     

Synthesis of well‐defined AB20‐type star polymers with cyclodextrin‐core by combination of NMP and ATRP

The synthesis of an AB₂₀‐type heteroarm star polymer consisting of a polystyrene arm and 20‐arms of poly(methyl methacrylate) or poly(tert‐butyl acrylate) was carried out using the combination of nitroxide‐mediated polymerization (NMP) and atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP). The NMP of styrene was carried out using mono‐6‐[4‐(1′‐(2″,2″,6″,6″‐tetramethyl‐1″‐piperidinyloxy)‐ethyl)benzamido]‐β‐cyclodextrin peracetate ( 1 ) to afford end‐functionalized polystyrene with an acetylated β‐cyclodextrin (β‐CyD) unit (prepolymer 2 ) with a number‐average molecular weight (M_n) of 11700 and a polydispersity (M_w/M_n) of 1.17. After deacetylation of prepolymer 2 , the resulting polymer was reacted with 2‐bromoisobutyric anhydride to give end‐functionalized polystyrene with 20(2‐bromoisobutyrol)s β‐CyD, macroinitiator 4 . The copper (I)‐mediated ATRP of methyl methacrylate (MMA) and tert‐butyl acrylate (tBA) was carried out using macroinitiator 4 . The resulting polymers were isolated by SEC fractionation to produce AB₂₀‐type star polymers with a β‐CyD‐core, 5 . The well‐defined structure of 5 with weight‐average molecular weight (M_w)s of 13,500–65,300 and M_w/M_n's of 1.26–1.28 was demonstrated by SEC and light scattering measurements. The arm polymers were separated from 5 by destruction with 28 wt % sodium methoxide in order to analyze the details of their characteristic structure. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 43: 4271–4279, 2005     

Amphiphilic star‐block copolymers based on a hyperbranched core: Synthesis and supramolecular self‐assembly

Novel amphiphilic star‐block copolymers, star poly(caprolactone)‐block‐poly[(2‐dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate] and poly(caprolactone)‐block‐poly(methacrylic acid), with hyperbranched poly(2‐hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (PHEMA–OH) as a core moiety were synthesized and characterized. The star‐block copolymers were prepared by a combination of ring‐opening polymerization and atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP). First, hyperbranched PHEMA–OH with 18 hydroxyl end groups on average was used as an initiator for the ring‐opening polymerization of ε‐caprolactone to produce PHEMA–PCL star homopolymers [PHEMA = poly(2‐hydroxyethyl methacrylate); PCL = poly(caprolactone)]. Next, the hydroxyl end groups of PHEMA–PCL were converted to 2‐bromoesters, and this gave rise to macroinitiator PHEMA–PCL–Br for ATRP. Then, 2‐dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate or tert‐butyl methacrylate was polymerized from the macroinitiators, and this afforded the star‐block copolymers PHEMA–PCL–PDMA [PDMA = poly(2‐dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate)] and PHEMA–PCL–PtBMA [PtBMA = poly(tert‐butyl methacrylate)]. Characterization by gel permeation chromatography and nuclear magnetic resonance confirmed the expected molecular structure. The hydrolysis of tert‐butyl ester groups of the poly(tert‐butyl methacrylate) blocks gave the star‐block copolymer PHEMA–PCL–PMAA [PMAA = poly(methacrylic acid)]. These amphiphilic star‐block copolymers could self‐assemble into spherical micelles, as characterized by dynamic light scattering and transmission electron microscopy. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 43: 6534–6544, 2005     

Tuning amphiphilicity/temperature‐induced self‐assembly and in‐situ disulfide crosslinking of reduction‐responsive block copolymers

New poly(ethylene oxide)‐based block copolymers (ssBCs) with a random copolymer block consisting of a reduction‐responsive disulfide‐labeled methacrylate (HMssEt) and a thermoresponsive di(ethylene glycol)‐containing methacrylate (MEO₂MA) units were synthesized. The ratio of HMssEt/MEO₂MA units in the random P(MEO₂MA‐co‐HMssEt) copolymer block enables the characteristics of well‐defined ssBCs to be amphiphilic or thermoresponsive and double hydrophilic. Their amphiphilicity or temperature‐induced self‐assembly results in nanoaggregates with hydrophobic cores having different densities of pendant disulfide linkages. The effect of disulfide crosslinking density on morphological variation of disulfide‐crosslinked nanogels is investigated. In response to reductive reactions, the partial cleavage of pendant disulfide linkages in the hydrophobic cores converts the physically associated aggregates to disulfide‐crosslinked nanogels. The occurrence of in‐situ disulfide crosslinks provides colloidal stability upon dilution. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2014 , 52, 2057–2067     

Preparation of poly(ethylene oxide) star polymers and poly(ethylene oxide)–polystyrene heteroarm star polymers by atom transfer radical polymerization

Poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) star polymer with a microgel core was prepared by atom transfer radical poylmerization (ATRP) of divinyl benzene (DVB) with mono‐2‐bromoisobutyryl PEO ester as a macroinitiator. Several factors, such as the feed ratio of DVB to the initiator, type of catalysts, and purity of DVB, play important roles during star formation. The crosslinked poly(divinyl benzene) (PDVB) core was further obtained by the hydrolysis of PEO star to remove PEO arms. Size exclusion chromatography (SEC) traces revealed the bare core has a broad molecular weight distribution. PEO–polystyrene (PS) heteroarm star polymer was synthesized through grafting PS from the core of PEO star by another ATRP of styrene (St) because of the presence of initiating groups in the core inherited from PEO star. Characterizations by SEC, ¹H NMR, and DSC revealed the successful preparation of the target star copolymers. Scanning electron microscopy images suggested that PEO–PS heteroarm star can form spherical micelles in water/tetrahydrofuran mixture solvents, which further demonstrated the amphiphilic nature of the star polymer. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 42: 2263–2271, 2004     

Thermoresponsive star triblock copolymers by combination of ROP and ATRP: From micelles to hydrogels

Novel biocompatible, biodegradable, four‐arm star, triblock copolymers containing a hydrophobic poly(ε‐caprolactone) (PCL) segment, a hydrophilic poly(oligo(ethylene oxide)475 methacrylate) (POEOMA475) segment and a thermoresponsive poly(di(ethylene oxide) methyl ether methacrylate) (PMEO₂MA) segment were synthesized by a combination of controlled ring‐opening polymerization (ROP) and atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP). First, a four‐arm PCL macroinitiator [(PCL‐Br)₄] for ATRP was synthesized by the ROP of ε‐caprolactone (CL) catalyzed by stannous octoate in the presence of pentaerythritol as the tetrafunctional initiator followed by esterification with 2‐bromoisobutyryl bromide. Then, sequential ATRP of oligo(ethylene oxide) methacrylate (OEOMA475, M_n = 475) and di(ethylene oxide) methyl ether methacrylate) (MEO₂MA) were carried out using the (PCL‐Br)₄ tetrafunctional macroinitiator, in different sequence, resulting in preparation of (PCL‐b‐POEOMA475‐b‐PMEO₂MA)₄ and (PCL‐b‐PMEO₂MA‐b‐POEOMA475)₄ star triblock copolymers. These amphiphilic copolymers can self‐assemble into spherical micelles in aqueous solution at room temperature. The thermal responses of the polymeric micelles were investigated by dynamic light scattering and ultraviolet spectrometer. The properties of the two series of copolymers are quite different and depend on the sequence distribution of each block along the arms of the star. The (PCL‐b‐POEOMA475‐b‐PMEO₂MA)₄ star copolymer, with the thermoresponsive PMEO₂MA segment on the periphery, can undergo reversible sol‐gel transitions between room temperature (22 °C) and human body temperature (37 °C). © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem, 2011     

Synthesis and self‐assembly of amphiphilic macrocyclic block copolymer topologies

We demonstrated the synthesis of miktoarm star block copolymers of AB, AB₂, and A₂B, in which block A consisted of linear poly(tert‐butyl acrylate) (P^tBA) and block B consisted of cyclic polystyrene. These structures were produced using the atom transfer radical polymerization to make telechelic polymers that, after modification, were further coupled together by copper‐catalyzed “click” reactions with high coupling efficiency. Deprotection of P^tBA to poly(acrylic acid) (PAA) afforded amphiphilic miktoarm structures that when micellized in water gave vesicle morphologies when the block length of PAA was 21 units. Increasing the PAA block length to 46 units produced spherical core‐shell micelles. AB₂ miktoarm stars packed more densely into the core compared to its linear counterpart (i.e., a four times greater aggregation number with approximately the same hydrodynamic diameter), resulting in the PAA arms being more compressed in the corona and extending into the water phase beyond its normal Gaussian chain conformation. These results show that the cyclic structure attached to an amphiphilic block has a significant influence on increasing the aggregation number through a greater packing density. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem, 2011.