A networking method to compare theories: metacognition in problem solving reformulated within the Anthropological Theory of the Didactic

An important role of theory in research is to provide new ways of conceptualizing practical questions, essentially by transforming them into scientific problems that can be more easily delimited, typified and approached. In mathematics education, theoretical developments around ‘metacognition’ initially appeared in the research domain of Problem Solving closely related to the practical question of how to learn (and teach) to solve non-routine problems. This paper presents a networking method to approach a notion as ‘metacognition’ within a different theoretical perspective, as the one provided by the Anthropological Theory of the Didactic. Instead of trying to directly ‘translate’ this notion from one perspective to another, the strategy used consists in going back to the practical question that is at the origin of ‘metacognition’ and show how the new perspective relates this initial question to a very different kind of phenomena. The analysis is supported by an empirical study focused on a teaching proposal in grade 10 concerning the problem of comparing mobile phone tariffs.     

Networking strategies and methods for connecting theoretical approaches: first steps towards a conceptual framework

The article contributes to the ongoing discussion on ways to deal with the diversity of theories in mathematics education research. It introduces and systematizes a collection of case studies using different strategies and methods for networking theoretical approaches which all frame (qualitative) empirical research. The term ‘networking strategies’ is used to conceptualize those connecting strategies, which aim at reducing the number of unconnected theoretical approaches while respecting their specificity. The article starts with some clarifications on the character and role of theories in general, before proposing first steps towards a conceptual framework for networking strategies. Their application by different methods as well as their contribution to the development of theories in mathematics education are discussed with respect to the case studies in the ZDM-issue.     

Digital game‐based learning for K–12 mathematics education: A meta‐analysis

Digital games (e.g., video games or computer games) have been reported as an effective educational method that can improve students' motivation and performance in mathematics education. This meta‐analysis study (a) investigates the current trend of digital game‐based learning (DGBL) by reviewing the research studies on the use of DGBL for mathematics learning, (b) examines the overall effect size of DGBL on K‐12 students' achievement in mathematics learning, and (c) discusses future directions for DGBL research in the context of mathematics learning. In total, 296 studies were collected for the review, but of those studies, only 33 research studies were identified as empirical studies and systematically analyzed to investigate the current research trends. In addition, due to insufficient statistical data, only 17 out of the 33 studies were analyzed to calculate the overall effect size of digital games on mathematics education. This study will contribute to the research community by analyzing recent trends in significant DGBL research, especially for those who are interested in using DGBL for mathematics education.     

Curriculum developers and problem solving: the case of Israeli elementary school projects

Problem solving has been a main focus in mathematics education for several decades, yet it seems that its definition and classroom implementation are far from being consensual. We explore the views and approaches of a small community: the project leaders of five elementary mathematics curriculum development projects in Israel, working within a centralized system, which dictates the syllabus. We describe and analyze their views along six categories: What are problems? What are not problems? Classification of problems, problem solving and individual differences, the ratio of problem solving tasks to other tasks in the project, and the role of heuristics and metacognition in teaching problem solving. We describe, exemplify, interpret and discuss the (few) points of convergence and the many different approaches. Finally, we reflect on the possible role of research in settling those differences. We speculate that our analysis and results go beyond the local and the idiosyncratic.     

高师生数学解题的元认知模型及其特点研究

从实证的角度探讨数学解题的元认知模型.以数学解题中的元认知知识、元认知体验、元认知策略三者为基本因素,研制一份元认知问卷;施测问卷,对数据进行探索性因素分析和验证性因素分析,检验因素假设与数据之间的拟合程度.施测正式问卷于高师生,结果表明,高师生数学解题的元认知模型还保持一定程度的发展,而且发展不平衡.总体水平而言,女生比男生好;大三学生明显高于大二、大一学生,大一优于大二,大二年级是个转折时期.     

Research in mathematics education— Who benefits?

For a long time mathematics education tries hard to win recognition as an academic discipline. In related classroom research and curriculum development one can find not rarely theories and methods in use that are adapted from other (and well established) disciplines. However, in many cases these adaptations do not serve the researcher's goals, yet more, their effects can contradict the stated purposes. The article discusses a few fundamental problems related to empirical research in mathematics education (e.g. the role of the teachers in experimental/control groups), using as concretization a printed research report that is chosen deliberately (and made nameless, therefore).     

Socio-economic status and mathematics achievement in China: a review

Mathematics education is a cultural-specific social activity. China, as a developing country with a long history and a unique culture, has the largest number of teachers and students in the world. Hence, it is of significance to explore the issue of the impact of socio-economic status (SES) on mathematics education within the Chinese context. However, investigations aiming to address this issue are relatively rare. This study was designed to examine the relationship between Chinese students’ SES and their mathematics achievements. Results reveal that Chinese students’ SES exerts significant influence on their mathematics achievements, and several important constituents of SES, such as parents’ education and family income, stand out among others. In this paper, the cultural causes of the influence are discussed, together with a general introduction to the social and educational context. These could partly explain the empirical results, along with factors such as the values of education in traditional Chinese culture and the current important status of mathematics in modern society as well as Chinese school curriculum materials’ effect on students’ mathematics achievements. The economic and social situation in China, especially the imbalanced distribution of educational resources between and within the urban and rural areas, could magnify the role of SES in mathematics achievements. Finally, the future direction of measuring and interpreting the SES’s influence on mathematics achievement in the Chinese context is also discussed.     

Implications for Developing and Researching Elementary School Mathematics Coaches

In recent years, national organizations, mathematics educators, and policy makers have called for the development of elementary school mathematics coaches to improve mathematics teaching and learning in elementary schools. The literacy field has found success and promise in the work of instructional coaches, and the mathematics education community can benefit from what professionals in literacy have learned and practiced. This article presents a synthesis of empirical research about instructional coaches, in both literacy and mathematics, as well as the neo‐Vygotskian construct of assisted performance. Following the synthesis, implications are presented regarding how to develop the essential skills and knowledge needed for elementary school mathematics coaches as well as how to examine the impact of their efforts in schools.     

Trends of the history of mathematics education in Brazil

The text aims at characterizing and analyzing the production of the history of mathematics education in Brazil. The study takes the presentations from the last National Seminar of History of Mathematics as a starting point. Such event gathered researchers, in a more significant and comprising way, interested in historical studies of mathematics and its teaching. The characterization points at the existence of four different tendencies: a production that considers the studies about history of mathematics education as part of the research about history of mathematics; a trend of opinions that takes into account the pedagogical use of history in mathematics education and establishes conditions for the research in the history of mathematics education; studies that use oral history for mathematics teachers’ training courses; and, finally, another trend that treats the history of mathematics education as history, that means, a specificity of historical production, having the mathematics education as an object. It will be shown that the characterization of those trends reveals different ways of representing the past of mathematics education, as well as the relationships Brazilian researches keep with international studies about this subject.     

Argumentation and participation in the primary mathematics classroom: Two episodes and related theoretical abductions

The main assumption of this article is that learning mathematics depends on the student's participation in processes of collective argumentation. On the empirical level, such processes will be analyzed with Toulmin's theory of argumentation and Goffman's idea of decomposition of the speaker's role. On the theoretical level, different statuses of participation in processes of argumentation will be considered. By means of the method of comparative analysis, different grades of autonomy according to the interactional contribution of a student can be reconstructed. The paper finishes with remarks about consequences for improving mathematics teaching in schools and mathematics teacher education at university level.     

Traditional instruction in advanced mathematics courses: a case study of one professor’s lectures and proofs in an introductory real analysis course

It is widely accepted by mathematics educators and mathematicians that most proof-oriented university mathematics courses are taught in a “definition-theorem-proof” format. However, there are relatively few empirical studies on what takes place during this instruction, why this instruction is used, and how it affects students’ learning. In this paper, I investigate these issues by examining a case study of one professor using this type of instruction in an introductory real analysis course. I first describe the professor’s actions in the classroom and argue that these actions are the result of the professor’s beliefs about mathematics, students, and education, as well as his knowledge of the material being covered. I then illustrate how the professor’s teaching style influenced the way that his students attempted to learn the material. Finally, I discuss the implications that the reported data have on mathematics education research.     

Changed views on mathematical knowledge in the course of didactical theory development—independent corpus of scientific knowledge or result of social constructions?

The study tries to show one line of how the German didactical tradition has evolved in response to new theoretical ideas and new—empirical—research approaches in mathematics education. First, the classical mathematical didactics, notably ‘stoffdidaktik’ as one (besides other) specific German tradition are described. The critiques raised against ‘stoffdidaktik’ concepts [for example, forms of ‘progressive mathematisation’, ‘actively discovering learning processes’ and ‘guided reinvention’ (cf. Freudenthal, Wittmann)] changed the basic views on the roles that ‘mathematical knowledge’, ‘teacher’ and ‘student’ have to play in teaching–learning processes; this conceptual change was supported by empirical studies on the professional knowledge and activities of mathematics teachers [for example, empirical studies of teacher thinking (cf. Bromme)] and of students’ conceptions and misconceptions (for example, psychological research on students’ mathematical thinking). With the interpretative empirical research on everyday mathematical teaching–learning situations (for example, the work of the research group around Bauersfeld) a new research paradigm for mathematics education was constituted: the cultural system of mathematical interaction (for instance, in the classroom) between teacher and students.     

The Road To Digitopolis: Perils of Problem Solving

How students solve problems is a topic of central concern both to educational researchers and to math/science teachers: What is the nature of good and poor problem solving? How can students improve their problem-solving capacities? Teachers are in a unique position to witness problem solving in action, and to draw connections between the classroom experiences of their students and the findings of research. This article presents an instance of problem solving (drawn from a popular children's book) annotated with references to current research in cognition and education. The annotations explore issues such as the effect of performance anxiety on problem solving, how problem solvers handle the experience of confusion, and the role of self-monitoring and metacognition in problem solving.     

Integrating Science and Mathematics Education: Historical Analysis

A number of national science and mathematics education professional associations, and recently technology education associations, are united in their support for the integration of science and mathematics teaching and learning. The purpose of this historical analysis is two‐fold: (a) to survey the nature and number of documents related to integrated science and mathematics education published from 1901 through 2001 and (b) to compare the nature and number of integrated science and mathematics documents published from 1990 through 2001 to the previous 89 years (1901–1989). Based upon this historical analysis, three conclusions have emerged. First, national and state standards in science and mathematics education have resulted in greater attention to integrated science and mathematics education, particularly in the area of teacher education, as evidenced by the proliferation of documents on this topic published from 1901–2001. Second, the historical comparison between the time periods of 1901–1989 versus 1990–2001 reveals a grade‐level shift in integrated instructional documents. Middle school science continues to be highlighted in integrated instructional documents, but surprisingly, a greater emphasis upon secondary mathematics and science education is apparent in the integration literature published from 1990–2001. Third, although several theoretical integration models have been posited in the literature published from 1990–2001, more empirical research grounded in these theoretical models is clearly needed in the 21st century.     

Learning from the Eastern and the Western debate: the case of mathematics teacher education

Comparative studies have gained significant influence in the last decades, and school systems of many countries have been revised referring to better results of other countries in international large-scale assessments. Authors of such studies commonly link their interpretations of the results to distinctions between “Eastern” and “Western” cultures, in particular with respect to the consistent and continuing outstanding performance of East Asian learners compared with their Western counterparts. One question is whether the same achievement pattern holds for future teachers and whether similar cultural differences may cause it. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement’s “Teacher Education and Development Study in Mathematics” (TEDS-M) was the first comparative study that focused on the outcomes of teacher education with standardised testing. In this paper—based on the TEDS-M results—commonalities and differences in the achievement of future teachers from Eastern and Western countries are explored and related to a cultural perspective. Cultural differences between Eastern and Western approaches concerning mathematics, mathematics education and mathematics teachers are analysed with respect to the achievement pattern. The paper closes with reflections on possible consequences concerning the development of teachers’ knowledge and teachers’ expertise in mathematics education.     

The relationship between mathematical problem-solving skills and self-regulated learning through homework behaviours,motivation, and metacognition

Studies highlight that using appropriate strategies during problem solving is important to improve problem-solving skills and draw attention to the fact that using these skills is an important part of students’ self-regulated learning ability. Studies on this matter view the self-regulated learning ability as key to improving problem-solving skills. The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between mathematical problem-solving skills and the three dimensions of self-regulated learning (motivation, metacognition, and behaviour), and whether this relationship is of a predictive nature. The sample of this study consists of 323 students from two public secondary schools in Istanbul. In this study, the mathematics homework behaviour scale was administered to measure students’ homework behaviours. For metacognition measurements, the mathematics metacognition skills test for students was administered to measure offline mathematical metacognitive skills, and the metacognitive experience scale was used to measure the online mathematical metacognitive experience. The internal and external motivational scales used in the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) test were administered to measure motivation. A hierarchic regression analysis was conducted to determine the relationship between the dependent and independent variables in the study. Based on the findings, a model was formed in which 24% of the total variance in students’ mathematical problem-solving skills is explained by the three sub-dimensions of the self-regulated learning model: internal motivation (13%), willingness to do homework (7%), and post-problem retrospective metacognitive experience (4%).     

Truth versus validity in mathematical proof

In mathematics education, it is often said that mathematical statements are necessarily either true or false. It is also well known that this idea presents a great deal of difficulty for many students. Many authors as well as researchers in psychology and mathematics education emphasize the difference between common sense and mathematical logic. In this paper, we provide both epistemological and didactic arguments to reconsider this point of view, taking into account the distinction made in logic between truth and validity on one hand, and syntax and semantics on the other. In the first part, we provide epistemological arguments showing that a central concern for logicians working with a semantic approach has been finding an appropriate distance between common sense and their formal systems. In the second part, we turn from these epistemological considerations to a didactic analysis. Supported by empirical results, we argue for the relevance of the distinction and the relationship between truth and validity in mathematical proof for mathematics education.     

Humans-with-media and continuing education for mathematics teachers in online environments

This paper begins by situating online mathematics education in Brazil within the context of research on digital technology over the past 25?years. I argue that Brazilian research on technology in mathematics education can be divided into four phases, and then present an example that ??blends?? aspects of the second and third phases. Phase two can be characterized by research with software designed to address traditional mathematics topics, such as functions, while the third phase is characterized by online courses. The data presented show creative solutions for a problem designed for collectives of humans-with-function-software. The paper is analyzed from a perspective that emphasizes the role of different technologies as teachers and professors collaborate to produce knowledge about the use of mathematical software in regular face-to-face classrooms. A model of online education is presented. Finally, the paper discusses how technology may change collaboration and teaching approaches in continuing education, as it allows for greater integration of online learning with teachers?? classroom activities in schools. In this case, the online platform plays an active role in the learning collective composed of humans-with-media.