Elementary mathematics specialists in “departmentalized” teaching assignments: Affordances and constraints

In this article, we describe the experiences of three Elementary Mathematics Specialists (EMS) who were part of a larger project investigating the impact of EMS certification and assignment (self-contained or “departmentalized”) on teaching practices and student achievement outcomes. All three of the teachers were “departmentalized,” in the sense that each was responsible for teaching mathematics to at least two groups of students, and accordingly, did not teach all subjects as would a typical self-contained elementary teacher. Each teacher had recently earned an Elementary Mathematics Specialist certificate through completion of a 24-credit, graduate-level program designed to build pedagogical content knowledge and leadership capacity in mathematics. Through a series of observations and interviews over the course of one school year, we examined how the teachers described and navigated specific affordances and constraints they encountered in their particular contexts. Common affordances included opportunities to revise and learn from instruction, and constraints included reduced flexibility introduced by the need to schedule multiple classes of mathematics. Despite these common features, we found important differences between the three models of departmentalization, which we describe as team approach, class swap, and grade-level mathematics teacher. For example, some of the models provided more opportunities for collaboration while others made it difficult for teachers to address potential inequities in learning opportunities across sections. Despite the constraints of their respective models, we found evidence of the EMS-certified teachers drawing on professional expertise in mathematics to meet student needs.     

Teachers' Understandings of Realistic Contexts to Capitalize on Students' Prior Knowledge

The theory of realistic mathematics education establishes that framing mathematics problems in realistic contexts can provide opportunities for guided reinvention. Using data from a study group, I examine geometry teachers' perspectives regarding realistic contexts during a lesson study cycle. I ask the following. (a) What are the participants' perspectives regarding realistic contexts that elicit students' prior knowledge? (b) How are the participants' perspectives of realistic contexts related to teachers' instructional obligations? (c) How do the participants draw upon these perspectives when designing a lesson? The participants identified five characteristics that are needed for realistic contexts: providing entry points to mathematics, using “catchy” and “youthful” contexts, selecting personal contexts for the students, using contexts that are not “too fake” or “forced,” and connecting to the lesson's mathematical content. These characteristics largely relate to the institutional, interpersonal, and individual obligations with some connections with the disciplinary obligation. The participants considered these characteristics when identifying a realistic context for a problem‐based lesson. The context promoted mathematical connections. In addition, the teachers varied the context to increase the relevance for their students. The study has implications for supporting teachers' implementation of problem‐based instruction by attending to teachers' perspectives regarding the obligations shaping their work.     

Learning from similarities and differences: a reflection on the potentials and constraints of cross-national studies in mathematics

Research in mathematics education that crosses national boundaries provides new insights into the development and improvement of the teaching and learning of mathematics. In particular, cross-national comparisons lead researchers to more explicit understanding of their own implicit theories about how teachers teach and how children learn mathematics in their local contexts as well as what is going on in school mathematics in other countries. Further, when researchers from multiple countries and regions study collaboratively aspects of teaching and learning of mathematics, the taken-for-granted familiar practices in the classroom can be questioned. Such cross-national comparisons provide opportunities for researchers and educators to probe typical dichotomies such as “high-performing” versus “low performing”, “teacher-centred versus student-centred”, or even “East versus West”, in searching for similarities and differences in educational policies and practices in different cultural contexts.     

Proofs as bearers of mathematical knowledge

Yehuda Rav’s inspiring paper “Why do we prove theorems?” published in Philosophia Mathematica (1999, 7, pp. 5–41) has interesting implications for mathematics education. We examine Rav’s central ideas on proof—that proofs convey important elements of mathematics such as strategies and methods, that it is “proofs rather than theorems that are the bearers of mathematical knowledge”and thus that proofs should be the primary focus of mathematical interest—and then discuss their significance for mathematics education in general and for the teaching of proof in particular.     

Examining and conceptualizing the relationship between teacher praise and the co-construction of mathematical competence in classrooms

In this study we examined how teacher praise varies across and within four middle school mathematics classrooms in relationship to mathematical competence. We then conceptualized how teacher praise contributes to the co-construction of normative identity: the class’ shared understanding of what counts as being a competent learner in a mathematics classroom. Findings revealed teachers rarely used person-based praise (e.g., “you’re smart”) and frequently gave generic praise (e.g., “good”). Each teacher’s praise patterns supported different co-constructions of mathematical competence. Although some teachers taught the same lessons or ascribed to similar pedagogical approaches, findings suggest teachers’ praise patterns may contribute to the co-construction of different normative identities, some more exclusive and others more inclusive. Findings indicate praise may be a low-stakes and potentially impactful teacher practice with implications for students’ understanding of what it means to be good at math.     

Hong Kong teachers’ views of effective mathematics teaching and learning

Twelve experienced mathematics teachers in Hong Kong were invited to face-to-face semi-structured interviews to express their views about mathematics, about mathematics learning and about the teacher and teaching. Mathematics was generally regarded as a subject that is practical, logical, useful and involves thinking. In view of the abstract nature of the subject, the teachers took abstract thinking as the goal of mathematics learning. They reflected that it is not just a matter of “how” and “when”, but one should build a path so that students can proceed from the concrete to the abstract. Their conceptions of mathematics understanding were tapped. Furthermore, the roles of memorisation, practices and concrete experiences were discussed, in relation with understanding. Teaching for understanding is unanimously supported and along this line, the characteristics of an effective mathematics lesson and of an effective mathematics teacher were discussed. Though many of the participants realize that there is no fixed rule for good practices, some of the indicators were put forth. To arrive at an effective mathematics lesson, good preparation, basic teaching skills and good relationship with the students are prerequisite.     

A locus for transnational exchanges: European mathematical journals for students and teachers, 1860s–1914

While there were a few mathematical journals aimed at teachers and students as early as the 1840s, it was only in the late 19th century that they became more numerous in Europe. This article is based on the analysis of a corpus of European mathematical journals published between the 1860s and World War I, selected in the first place because they were aimed at high school teachers and high school or/and first two years university students, which are often referred to as “intermediate journals”. All these journals had focused on the teaching of mathematics and, as such, they were shaped by the educational context of the country in which they were published. However, leafing through theses journals, one is struck by the fact that the mathematics they published was in fact highly commensurable, and can see that they were the locus of transnational exchanges on mathematical knowledge. This article shows that several aspects of “internationalisation” were in fact at stake in mathematical journals for students: making knowledge from elsewhere available and of publicizing to the whole world the mathematics produced in one country; making people from different countries collaborate. Finally, it focuses on the effects of transnational exchanges between journals for teachers and students: what was the mathematical knowledge that was circulated through them, and in what respect was it different from that published in other mathematical journals?     

问题驱动 多元表征的概念教学探究——对偶线性规划教学案例设计

数学与应用数学(师范)专业中的《运筹学》具有跨学科、实践性的课程特点,目标在于培养职前教师用数学方法解决实际问题的能力.结合义务教育阶段新课程标准中"四基"的提出这一背景,本文将以线性规划部分(运筹数学)对偶线性规划概念的引入这一知识模块为例,探讨通过问题串形式进行问题驱动、多元表征的概念教学过程.即遵循问题驱动—兴趣驱动—问题意识发展—提出和解决新问题,依据数学与外部联系、数学内部联系两条主线设计教学和学习,探索如何通过问题驱动、多元表征的结构化教学过程引导学生的学习方式发生改变,增强探究学习的动机,发展问题解决能力.课堂教学实践证明效果优于以往单一的讲授式教学法,一定程度上提高了学生的学业成绩、应用问题的兴趣和问题解决意识.     

Similarities and differences in teachers’ questioning in German and Japanese mathematics classrooms

This study aims to capture similarities and differences in teachers’ questioning in German and Japanese mathematics classrooms, specifically focusing on the stage of introducing new mathematical content. The author analyzed consecutive mathematics classes taught by experienced teachers in Germany and Japan, who were recruited based on their locally defined “teaching competence” in the Learner’s Perspective Study. The results revealed that even questions that required students to recall previously learned content or provide the results of a calculation, which were regarded as lower cognitive questions in previous studies, played key roles at the stage of introducing new mathematical content in both German and Japanese classrooms. Further, distinctive patterns in the sequences of teachers’ questioning were identified. These differences suggest what is valued as quality mathematics teaching in each educational system.     

Interaction analysis of mathematical communication in primary teaching: The epistemological perspective

Communication between students and teacher in the mathematics classroom is a form of social interaction which focuses on a specific topic:mathematical knowledge. This knowledge cannot be introduced into classroom interaction “from the outside”, but grows through the communicative process, in the course of interactive exchanges between the participants of discussion. Although mathematical communication must be seen and analysed in the same way as any other form of communication, the particularity of interactive constructions of mathematical knowledge and its specificsocial epistemology within the context of teaching processes has to be taken into consideration. Also, the institutional influences of school institutions and those of teaching (analysed in the frame of general socio-interactive research approaches) must be considered. An epistemology-oriented interaction research approaches the specificity of amathematical classroom and communication culture in its analyses.     

Conception of expert mathematics teacher: a comparative study between Hong Kong and Chongqing

This paper reports the similarities and differences in how “expert mathematics teacher” is conceptualized by mathematics educators in Hong Kong and Chongqing, two cities in China which share similar but different cultural and social backgrounds. Thirty-seven mathematics education researchers, school principals with mathematics education background, and mathematics teachers were interviewed on their perceptions of expert mathematics teacher. It is found that in both cities an expert mathematics teacher should have a profound knowledge base in mathematics, teaching, and students; strong ability in teaching; and a noble personality and a spirit of life-long learning. As for differences, an expert mathematics teacher should have the ability to conduct research, mentor other teachers, and have profound knowledge of examination and educational theories in Chongqing. These attributes were not found in Hong Kong. These similarities and differences are discussed, and relevant social and cultural factors in the two contexts are examined.     

Distinguishing Features of Mechanical and Human Problem-Solving

Over the years, research in mathematical problem-solving has examined expert/novice problem-solving performance on various types of problems and subjects. In particular, DeFranco examined two groups of Ph.D. mathematicians as they solved four mathematics problems and found that although all were content experts, only one group were problem-solving experts. Based on this study, this article posits the notion that one distinguishing feature between experts and novices is that experts tend to look for special features of a problem and use algorithms only as a “fail-safe” system while novices act like “machines” relying on algorithms to solve the problems. Why? The article explores the idea that novice problem solvers learned to solve problems the way they learned proof, that is, in a formal, abstract and mechanizable way. Beliefs about proof and the culture in which it is practiced help frame a mathematician's view of the discipline and ultimately impacts classroom practice. The authors believe that current classroom instruction tends to create a culture that fosters algorithmic proficiency and a “machine-like” approach to the learning of mathematics and problem-solving. Further, they argue that mathematicians need to be aware of the distinction between knowing a proof is true and explaining why it is true. When these distinctions are appreciated and practiced during classroom instruction, then and only then will students begin to acquire the mathematical knowledge to become better problem solvers.     

Research, practice, uncertainty and responsibility

Three issues concerning the relationship between research and practice are addressed. (1) A certain ‘prototype mathematics classroom’ seems to dominate the research field, which in many cases seems selective with respect to what practices to address. I suggest challenging the dominance of the discourse created around the prototype mathematics classroom. (2) I find it important to broaden the school-centred discourse on mathematics education and to address the very different out-of-school practices that include mathematics. Many of these practices are relevant for interpreting what is taking place in a school context. That brings us to (3) socio-political issues of mathematics education. When the different school-sites for learning mathematics as well as the many different practices that include mathematics are related, we enter the socio-political dimension of mathematics education.On the one hand we must consider questions like: Could socio-political discrimination be acted out through mathematics education? Could mathematics education exercise a regimentation and disciplining of students? Could it include discrimination in terms of language? Could it include sexism and racism? On the other hand: Could mathematics education bring about competencies which can be described as empowering, and as supporting the development of mathematical literary or a ‘mathemacy’, important for the development of critical citizenship?However, there is no hope for identifying a one-way route to mathemacy. More generally: There is no simple way of identifying the socio-political functions of mathematics education. Mathematics education has to face uncertainty, and this challenge brings us to the notion of responsibility.     

Modeling empowered by information and communication technologies

In this article, we describe our work with mathematical modeling (MM) at different educational levels and discuss how the use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) empowered such work. Characteristics of two trends in research which have influenced our work are presented: one is a Brazilian perspective of MM, and the other is the use of ICTs in mathematics classrooms seen through the lens of the theoretical construct “humans-with-media”. We introduce some key questions regarding the notion of mathematical model and the phases of the modeling process that were paramount for us. Finally, we describe and analyze two experiences using modeling in different educational contexts, and present some evidence of the empowering role of ICTs in such contexts.     

Perceptions of Professional Growth: A Mathematics Teacher Educator in Transition

To meet the need for reform in mathematics teacher preparation courses, two cycles of changes made in an elementary mathematics methods course are presented. Using action research, teaching approaches were developed, implemented, and evaluated as a meaningful way to continue my professional development. Results suggested that I improved my teaching practices and focused more on teaching tasks that engaged my students to “think like teachers.” Three critical components of teacher preparation courses are identified that are important for teacher educators to acknowledge when implementing change: (a) using reflective verbal and written communication, (b) establishing a collaborative mathematical community, and (c) focusing on a narrower selection of mathematical content.     

经济数学教学改革研究——从问题开放到思维开放

在经济数学教学中适当的引进数学开放题,可以引导学生运用多种思维方式解决问题,促进学生的思维开放,本文以《概率统计》为例,通过具体实例的构建将开放题引入经济数学教学中,以求通过问题的开放培养学生的开放思维。