Integrating history and philosophy in mathematics education at university level through problem-oriented project work

Through the last three decades several hundred problem-oriented student-directed projects concerning meta-aspects of mathematics and science have been performed in the 2-year interdisciplinary introductory science programme at Roskilde University. Three selected reports from this cohort of project reports are used to investigate and present empirical evidence for learning potentials of integrating history and philosophy in mathematics education. The three projects are: (1) a history project about the use of mathematics in biology that exhibits different epistemic cultures in mathematics and biology. (2) An educational project about the difficulties of learning mathematics that connects to the philosophy of mathematics. (3) A history of mathematics project that connects to the sociology of multiple discoveries. It is analyzed and discussed in what sense students gain first hand experiences with and learn about meta-aspects of mathematics and their mathematical foundation through the problem-oriented student-directed project work.     

A metacognitive intervention in mathematics at university level

The paper reports the main results of an instructional study. The study was aimed at improving the performance in mathematics of a group of university students of biology who repeatedly failed the final examination of a compulsory course in mathematics. The main difficulties of these students seemed to be metacognitive and affective in nature. The training therefore worked on metacognitive and affective features: knowledge about cognition, monitoring, beliefs, emotions and attitudes. The intervention was successful: at the end of the course all students passed the examination that they had failed so often. The results also suggest that it may be possible (and necessary) to ‘teach learning to learn’ mathematics.     

Policy issues in the teaching and learning of the mathem atical sciences at university level

Policy decisions and their implementation impact on the teaching and learning of mathematics in many ways. Sometimes this is overt and takes account of local factors and professional opinion. However global economic policies, often dominated by the actions of huge multinational corporations, can have considerable influence on all aspects of education including mathematics education. These policies appear to be creating greater inequity between and within nations. Quality mathematics education for all, a recurring theme at International Congress on Mathematical Education meetings, is becoming less of a reality. At the same time, mathematics education at every level is increasingly influenced by powerful bureaucrats rather than by the profession. It is suggested that mathematical scientists need to try to understand the political forces affecting mathematics education for the ICMI study on teaching and learning mathematics at the tertiary level to have maximum impact.     

An investigation into the teaching of mathematics to undergraduate economics students

This article attempts to present a novel application of a method of measuring accuracy for academic success predictors that could be used as a standard. This procedure is known as the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, which comes from statistical decision techniques. The statistical prediction techniques provide predictor models and their goodness-of-fit; in addition, ROC analysis allows to assess the accuracy of the ability to discriminate from success and failures cases of a classifier or predictive model, and so it could be considered complementary to others more commonly used. Thus, the ROC curve is used to compare and interpret the relative contribution of each university entrance factor in the correct classification as success or failure of the academic performance, as well as to establish cut-off scores for admissions and counselling purposes. It is revealed that the ROC analysis allows us to identify the better university entrance factor for each subject in predicting students’ academic success.     

Handheld technology for mathematics education: flashback into the future

In the 1990s, handheld technology allowed overcoming infrastructural limitations that had hindered until then the integration of ICT in mathematics education. In this paper, we reflect on this integration of handheld technology from a personal perspective, as well as on the lessons to be learnt from it. The main lesson in our opinion concerns the growing awareness that students’ mathematical thinking is deeply affected by their work with technology in a complex and subtle way. Theories on instrumentation and orchestration make explicit this subtlety and help to design and realise technology-rich mathematics education. As a conclusion, extrapolation of these lessons to a future with mobile multi-functional handheld technology leads to the issues of connectivity and in- and out-of-school collaborative work as major issues for future research.     

Integrating mathematics,statistics, and technology in vocational and workplace education

In the workplace mathematics and statistics are essential for communication and decision-making. Process workers at lower classifications of skill levels are likely to be confronted with statistical charts and warnings about nonconformity. Mathematics, statistics, and technology education in and for the workplace must take account of the cultural diversity which exists within and between workplaces. The design of generic mathematics, and in some cases statistics, curricula rarely reflect actual workplace practice except at a superficial level. One way of overcoming these problems is for mathematics/statistics educators to work in cooperation with industry, particularly at the local level, in a way that will encourage and support lifelong learning yet remain critical of the uses to which mathematics, statistics, and technology are put. This paper outlines some ways in which to address the challenge of making mathematics, statistics, and technology education take on real meaning within the context of the workplace.     

The history of mathematics as a coupling link between secondary and university teaching

During the years they spend in university, many mathematics students develop a very poor conception of mathematics and its teaching. This fact is bad in all cases, but even more in the case of those students who will be mathematics teachers in school. In this paper it is argued that the history of mathematics may be an efficient element to provide students with flexibility, open-mindedness and motivation towards mathematics. The theoretical background of this work relies both on recent research in mathematics education and on papers written by mathematicians of the past. Opinions are supported with examples. One example concerns a historical presentation of ‘definition’; it was developed with mathematics students who will become mathematics teachers. For students oriented to research or to applied mathematics, an example is presented to address the problem of the secondary-tertiary transition.     

Socio-economic and cultural mediators of mathematics achievement and between-school equity in mathematics education at the global level

This paper aims at identifying and understanding how and to what extent socioeconomic and cultural factors mediate mathematics achievement and between-school equity in mathematics education among countries. First, under the assumption that equity and quality of education are independent constructs, the construct of equity-in-quality in mathematics education is developed. Second, the 18 countries that were identified in the previous work of the author Jurdak in (Toward equity in quality in mathematics education. Springer, New York, 2009) as being diverse in mathematics education will serve as study cases to illustrate, compare, and contrast the mediatory role of socio-economic and cultural factors in mathematics achievement and between-school equity in mathematics education. The results show that the differences in mathematics achievement and between-school equity in mathematics education at the country level are associated with, and can be accounted for in some cases, by socioeconomic and cultural factors.     

Success-factors in transition to university mathematics

This study examines different factors' relative importance for students' performance in the transition to university mathematics. Students' characteristics (motivation, actions and beliefs) were measured when entering the university and at the end of the first year. Principal component analysis revealed four important constructs: Self-efficacy, Motivation type, Study habits and Views of mathematics. Subsequently, orthogonal partial least squares (OPLS) analysis was used for measuring the constructs' ability to predict students' university mathematics grades. No individual constructs measured at the time of entrance predicted more than 5% of the variation. On the other hand, jointly they predicted 14%, which is almost in pair with upper secondary grades predicting 17%. Constructs measured at the end of the first year were stronger predictors, jointly predicting 37% of the variation in university grades, with Self-efficacy (21%) and Motivation (12%) being the two strongest individual predictors. In general, Study habits were not important for predicting university achievement. However, for students with low upper secondary grades, the textbook and interaction with peers, rather than internet-based resources, contributed positively to achievement. The association between Views of mathematics and performance was weak for all groups and non-existing for students with low grades.     

Assessment of learning in university mathematics

The important issues in assessment practices for university undergraduates are identified. The way in which assessment can be used to enhance student learning, the impact of external factors on assessment methods and the barriers that inhibit change are discussed. The paper also discusses the various ways in which changes in assessment practices have have been implemented and studies that have been carried out to gauge the effect of different methods of assessment.     

The student experience of mathematical proof at university level

While proofs are central to university level mathematics courses, research indicates that some students may complete their degrees with an incomplete picture of what constitutes a proof and how proofs are developed. The paper sets out to review what is known of the student experience of mathematical proof at university level. In particular, some evidence is presented of the conceptions of mathematical proof that recent mathematics graduates bring to their postgraduate course to teach high school mathematics. Such evidence suggests that while the least well-qualified graduates may have the poorest grasp of mathematical proof, the most highly qualified may not necessarily have the richest form of subject matter knowledge needed for the most effective teaching. Some indication of the likely causes of this incomplete student perspective on proof are presented.     

Theories in practice: mathematics teaching and mathematics teacher education

Whilst research on the teaching of mathematics and the preparation of teachers of mathematics has been of major concern in our field for some decades, one can see a proliferation of such studies and of theories in relation to that work in recent years. This article is a reaction to the other papers in this special issue but I attempt, at the same time, to offer a different perspective. I examine first the theories of learning that are either explicitly or implicitly presented, noting the need for such theories in relation to teacher learning, separating them into: socio-cultural theories; Piagetian theory; and learning from practice. I go on to discuss the role of social and individual perspectives in authors’ approach. In the final section I consider the nature of the knowledge labelled as mathematical knowledge for teaching (MKT). I suggest that there is an implied telos about ‘good teaching’ in much of our research and that perhaps the challenge is to study what happens in practice and offer multiple stories of that practice in the spirit of “wild profusion” (Lather in Getting lost: Feminist efforts towards a double(d) science. SUNY Press, New York, 2007).     

Searching for good mathematics instruction at primary school level valued in Taiwan

In this article, we aim to provide a glimpse of what is counted as good mathematics instruction from Taiwanese perspectives and of various approaches developed and used for achieving high-quality mathematics instruction. The characteristics of good mathematics instruction from Taiwanese perspectives were first collected and discussed from three types of information sources. Although the number of characteristics of good mathematics instruction may vary from one source to another, they can be generally organized in three phases including lesson design before instruction, classroom instruction during the lesson and activities after lesson. In addition to the general overview of mathematics classroom instruction valued in Taiwan, we also analyzed 92 lessons from six experienced teachers whose instructional practices were generally valued in local schools and counties. We identified and discussed the characteristics of their instructional practices in three themes: features of problems and their uses in classroom instruction, aspects of problem–solution discussion and reporting, and the discussion of solution methods. To identify and promote high-quality mathematics instruction, various approaches have been developed and used in Taiwan including the development and use of new textbooks and teachers’ guides, teaching contests, master teacher training program, and teacher professional development programs.