The Development of an Instrument to Measure Preservice Teachers' Attitudes about Discourse in the Mathematics Classroom

This study explored the themes that comprise preservice teachers' attitudes regarding discourse in the K‐12 mathematics classroom. The initial development of the theory underlying preservice teachers' attitudes regarding mathematical discourse is documented through the development of a 5‐point Likert instrument. Analysis of the Preservice Teachers' Attitudes About Discourse in the Mathematics Classroom (PADM) Instrument (N – 277) resulted in three reliable factors: Promoting Mathematical Reasoning (α₁= .85), Examining Complex Mathematical Concepts (α₂= .81), and Valuing Students' Mathematical Ideas (α₃= .85). These results suggest a framework that mathematics educators can employ to address preservice teachers' attitudes regarding discourse in an effort to support their implementation of reform‐based discourse in the teaching of mathematics in their future classrooms.     

Teaching-Learning of Evaluative Criteria for Mathematical Arguments Through Classroom Discourse: A Cross-National Study

Videotaped lessons of 5th graders on equivalent fractions from 7 American and 6 Japanese classrooms were analyzed in terms of a recurrent pattern in public discourse among a teacher and students. This pattern—called inquiry, response, feedback—occurs when a teacher initiates discourse (mostly with an inquiry), a student or students respond (often with an answer to the teacher inquiry), and the teacher provides feedback to the student's response. We found2 approaches to the teaching-learning of the criteria for evaluating mathematical arguments. In the Japanese classroom, students were encouraged to offer their own argument to the whole class and evaluate arguments proposed by other students. They seldom were given direct evaluation by their teacher. In contrast, American teachers often gave individual elaboration as well as direct evaluation to the student's responses, and some of the teachers offered their own opinions about mathematics, about valid ways of argumentation, or about both. The Japanese approach would help students acquire evaluative criteria indirectly through participating in mathematical discourse, whereas the American approach would help students learn modes of arguments through direct instruction.     

Measuring K‐8 Teachers' Perceptions of Discourse Use in Their Mathematics Classes

This article documents the development and use of a survey instrument designed to measure K‐8 mathematics teachers ‘perceptions about discourse in mathematics classes. In particular, the 5‐point Likert‐type survey sought to address teachers ‘perceptions of their use of dialogic (dialogue to construct new meaning), univocal (conveying information), and general discourse in their mathematics classes. Factor analysis revealed three reliable factors that were compatible with the original constructs, these include: dialogic discourse (α₃= .67), univocal discourse (α₁= .83), and general discourse (α₂= .68). These results suggest a framework that could be used to uncover K‐8 teachers' perceptions of their use of discourse in mathematics instruction, especially if there is interest in tendencies toward univocal or dialogic discourse. In addition to research implications, the survey could be used to inform the design and implementation of teacher professional development that focuses on discourse in mathematics instruction.     

Teaching-Learning of Evaluative Criteria for Mathematical Arguments Through Classroom Discourse: A Cross-National Study

Videotaped lessons of 5th graders on equivalent fractions from 7 American and 6 Japanese classrooms were analyzed in terms of a recurrent pattern in public discourse among a teacher and students. This pattern—called inquiry, response, feedback—occurs when a teacher initiates discourse (mostly with an inquiry), a student or students respond (often with an answer to the teacher inquiry), and the teacher provides feedback to the student's response. We found2 approaches to the teaching-learning of the criteria for evaluating mathematical arguments. In the Japanese classroom, students were encouraged to offer their own argument to the whole class and evaluate arguments proposed by other students. They seldom were given direct evaluation by their teacher. In contrast, American teachers often gave individual elaboration as well as direct evaluation to the student's responses, and some of the teachers offered their own opinions about mathematics, about valid ways of argumentation, or about both. The Japanese approach would help students acquire evaluative criteria indirectly through participating in mathematical discourse, whereas the American approach would help students learn modes of arguments through direct instruction.     

Math Autobiographies: A Window into Teachers' Identities as Mathematics Learners

Mathematics autobiographies have the potential to help teachers reflect on their identities as mathematics learners and to understand their role in the development of their students' mathematics identities. This paper reports on a professional development project for K‐2 teachers (n = 41), in which participants were asked to write mathematics autobiographies. Using an adaptation of an existing framework for characterizing teachers' mathematics stories, we describe the consistencies among the participants' experiences as mathematics learners and the events that are identified as being the impetus for a transition from a negative to a positive attitude toward mathematics. Implications for both teachers and teacher educators are presented.     

Teaching Mathematics with a New Curriculum: Changes to Classroom Organization and Interactions

This report describes a high school mathematics teacher's decisions about classroom organization and interactions during his first two years using a new curriculum intended to support teachers' development of student-centered, contributive classroom discourse. In year one, the teacher conducted class and interacted with students primarily in small groups. In year two, he conducted more whole-class instruction. In both years, teacher-student interactions contained univocal and contributive discourse, but in year two the teacher sustained contributive discourse with students for longer periods. The teacher facilitated the most significant changes to classroom discourse in the instructional format with which he had the greatest experience (whole-class instruction). Over the period of this study, two key factors appeared to affect the teacher's decisions about classroom organization and interactions: his perception of students' expectations about mathematics classroom roles and activity, and his own discomfort associated with using a new curriculum. These areas are important candidates for future research about teachers' use of innovative mathematics curricula.     

The teacher’s role in guiding children’s mathematical ideas toward meeting lesson objectives

This paper investigates the classroom interactive pattern, in which the teacher aims to introduce new mathematical content to children by focusing on their mathematical thinking. First, by drawing on the results of studies on the features of social interaction patterns in mathematics classrooms, we develop a framework that we call a “guided focusing pattern,” composed of four phases. Next, we use this framework and Sfard’s (J Res Math Educ 31(3):296–327, 2000) theory of focal analysis to examine the social interaction occurring in a series of mathematics lessons conducted by an experienced teacher. In the ten consecutive lessons that we analyzed, the guided focusing pattern was salient; the teacher introduced key mathematical content to children while offering support and guidance in a variety of forms within each phase and when transitioning to the next phase. On the basis of the results, we highlight the teacher’s key instructional actions that facilitate the pattern of progressing through the mathematical content as closely linked to and guided by her lesson objectives.     

Identifying authority structures in mathematics classroom discourse: a case of a teacher’s early experience in a new context

We explore a conceptual frame for analyzing mathematics classroom discourse to understand the way authority is at work. This case study of a teacher moving from a school where he is known to a new setting offers us the opportunity to explore the use of the conceptual frame as a tool for understanding how language practice and authority relate in a mathematics classroom. This case study illuminates the challenges of establishing disciplinary authority in a new context while also developing the students’ sense of authority within the discipline. To analyze the communication in the teacher’s grade 12 class in the first school and grade 9 class early in the year at the new school, we use the four categories of positioning drawn from our earlier analysis of pervasive language patterns in mathematics classrooms—personal authority, discourse as authority, discursive inevitability, and personal latitude.     

The Road to Reform: A Grounded Theory Study of Parents' and Teachers' Influence on Elementary School Science and Mathematics

Though elementary teacher educators introduce new, reform‐based strategies in science and mathematics methods courses, researchers wondered how novices negotiate reform strategies once they enter the elementary school culture. Given that the extent of parents' and veteran teachers' influence on novice teachers is largely unknown, this grounded theory study explored parents' and teachers' expectations of children's optimal science and mathematics learning in the current era of reform. Data consisted of semi‐structured, open‐ended interviews with novice teachers (n = 20), veteran teachers (n = 9), and parents (n = 28). Researchers followed three stages of coding procedures to develop a logic model connecting participants' discrete designations of the landscape, regulating phenomena, contextual orientation, and desired outcomes. This logic model helped researchers develop propositions for future research on the interactive nature of parents' and teachers' influential role in elementary science and mathematics education. Implications encourage science and mathematics teacher educators—as well as school administrators—to explicitly develop and support novice teachers' ability to initiate and sustain parent/family engagement in order to create a school climate where teachers and parents are synergistically motivated to change.     

The Growing Awareness Inventory: Building Capacity for Culturally Responsive Science and Mathematics With a Structured Observation Protocol

This study represents a first iteration in the design process of the Growing Awareness Inventory (GAIn), a structured observation protocol for building the awareness of preservice teachers (PSTs) for resources in mathematics and science classrooms that can be used for culturally responsive pedagogy (CRP). The GAIn is designed to develop awareness of: how students use language in classrooms; relationships between teacher questioning patterns and student participation; messages conveyed by the classroom environment; and ways to incorporate students’ interests into lesson plans. The methodology took the form of a multiple case study design with fourteen mathematics PSTs as one case and five science PSTs as the other case. The participants' response to the GAIn and lesson plans served as data sources. Findings reveal that the GAIn scaffolded PSTs’ awareness of their students, their own attitudes, and several elements of CRP. However, there were key areas of CRP that were neither explored with the GAIn nor identified by the participants. Consistent with design‐based research, outcomes include a design framework for revision of the GAIn and a theory of action that situates it within a teacher education course that includes a field placement.     

Increasing Student Access to Qualified Science and Mathematics Teachers Through an Urban School‐University Partnership

Urban schools across the United States face a pervasive problem in their science and mathematics programs — a disproportionate number of the teachers in these classrooms are not certified, thus making them underqualified to teach these subject areas. Furthermore, urban schools deal with teacher shortages and attrition in these critical areas. The situation was found to be particularly severe in the Detroit Public School District. In response, Wayne State University and Detroit Public Schools embarked on a school‐university partnership program to prepare teachers in science and mathematics through an alternative pathway to teacher certification program. This partnership program has proven to be successful in recruiting, preparing, and retaining a significant number of qualified minority science and mathematics teachers to serve the students in Detroit schools.     

From numbers to narratives: Preservice teachers experiences’ with mathematics anxiety and mathematics teaching anxiety

This paper presents qualitative and quantitative approaches to exploring teachers’ experiences of mathematics anxiety (for learning and doing mathematics) and mathematics teaching anxiety (for instructing others in mathematics), the relationship between these types of anxiety and test/evaluation anxiety, and the impacts of anxiety on experiences in teacher education. Findings indicate that mathematics anxiety and mathematics teaching anxiety may be similar (i.e., that preservice teachers perceive a logical continuity and cumulative effect of their experiences of mathematics anxiety as learners in K–12 classrooms that impacts their work as teachers in future K–12 classrooms). Further, anxiety is not limited to occurring in evaluative settings, but when anxiety is triggered by thoughts of evaluation, preservice teachers may be affected by worrying about their own as well as their students' performances. The implications for preservice experiences within a teacher education program and for impacting future students are discussed.     

Using Sociocultural Theory to Teach Mathematics: A Vygotskian Perspective

This study describes an elementary teacher's implementation of sociocultural theory in practice. Communication is central to teaching with a sociocultural approach and to the understanding of students; teachers who use this theory involve students in explaining and justifying their thinking. In this study ethnographic research methods were used to collect data for 4 1/2 months in order to understand the mathematical culture of this fourth‐grade class and to portray how the teacher used a sociocultural approach to teach mathematics. To portray this teaching approach, teaching episodes from the teacher's mathematics lessons are described, and these episodes are analyzed to demonstrate how students created taken‐as‐shared meanings of mathematics. Excerpts from interviews with the teacher are also used to describe this teacher's thinking about her teaching.     

Teacher Questioning to Promote Justification and Generalization in Mathematics: What Research Practice Has Taught Us

This article explores the teacher's role in classroom environments that center on learning through student exploration, and reinvention, of important mathematics. In such environments, teachers will often work to create situations where students are invited to express their thinking, most especially to peers. How is this done? In the work reported here, both teacher questioning and teacher listening will play important parts, as does the teacher's background understanding of the mathematics and the children. This study focuses especially on teacher questioning in third- and fourth-grade classrooms associated with a longitudinal study now in its eleventh year. Analyses of videotaped data indicate a strong relationship between (1) careful monitoring of students' constructions leading to a problem solution, and (2) the posing of a timely question which can challenge learners to advance their understanding. What a teacher needs to know in order to work well with student explorations has important implications.     

Prospective Teachers' Perspectives on Mathematics Teaching and Learning: Lens for Interpreting Experiences in a Standards‐Based Mathematics Course

In a mathematics course for prospective elementary teachers, we strove to model standards‐based pedagogy. However, an end‐of‐class reflection revealed the prospective teachers were considering incorporating standards‐based strategies in their future classrooms in ways different from our intent. Thus, we drew upon the framework presented by Simon, Tzur, Heinz, Kinzel, and Smith to examine the prospective teachers' perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning and to address two research questions. What perspectives on the learning and teaching of mathematics do prospective elementary teachers hold? How do their perspectives impact their perception of standards‐based instruction in a mathematics course and their future teaching plans? Qualitative analyses of reflections from 106 prospective teachers revealed that they viewed mathematics as a logical domain representative of an objective reality. Their instructional preferences included providing firsthand opportunities for elementary students to perceive mathematics. They did not take into account the impact of a student's conceptions upon what is learned. Thus, the prospective teachers plan to incorporate standards‐based strategies to provide active experiences for their future elementary students, but they fail to base such strategies upon students' current mathematical conceptions. Throughout, the need to address prospective teachers' underlying perspectives of mathematics teaching and learning is stressed.     

Capitalizing on Emerging Technologies: A Case Study of Classroom Blogging

The challenge many teachers face is how to incorporate new technology into their classrooms that strengthens classroom learning by capitalizing on students’ media literacies. Blogs, a new and innovative technological tool, can be used in math and science classrooms to support student learning by capitalizing on students’ interests and familiarity with on‐line communication. This study explores the emerging blogging practices of one high school mathematics teacher and his class to explore issues of intent, use, and perceived value. Data sources for this case included one year's worth of blog content, an interview with the facilitating teacher, and students ‘perceptions of classroom blogging practices. Findings indicate that (1) teachers’ intentions focused on creating additional forms of participation as well as increasing student exposure time with content; (2) blogs were used in a wide variety of ways that likely afforded particular benefits; and (3) both teacher and students perceived the greater investment to be worthwhile. The findings are used to critically consider claims made in the literature about the potential of blogging to effectively support classroom learning.     

Talking mathematically: An analysis of discourse communities

Discourse has always been at the heart of teaching. In more recent years, the mathematics education community has also turned its attention towards understanding the role of discourse in mathematics teaching and learning. Using earlier classifications of discourse, in this paper, we looked at three types of classrooms: classrooms that engage in high discourse, low discourse and a hybrid of the two. We aimed to understand how the elements of each discourse affected classroom learning, relationships between teachers and students, and participatory structures for students. Overall, our findings highlight the important relationship between cognitively demanding tasks and mathematical talk, and the power of discourse as a “thinking device” as opposed to mere conduit of knowledge. Our work also points to the under-theorized nature of hybrid discourse in mathematics classrooms, thereby providing some directions for pedagogy and further research.     

Connections and confusion: teaching perimeter and area with a problem-solving oriented unit

Problem-solving-oriented mathematics curricula are viewed as important vehicles to help achieve K-12 mathematics education reform goals. Although mathematics curriculum projects are currently underway to develop such materials, little is known about how teachers actually use problem-solving-oriented curricula in their classrooms. This article profiles a middle-school mathematics teacher and examines her use of two problems from a pilot version of a sixth-grade unit developed by a mathematics curriculum project. The teacher's use of the two problems reveals that although problem-solving-oriented curricula can be used to yield rich opportunities for problem solving and making mathematical connections, such materials can also provide sites for student confusion and uncertainty. Examination of this variance suggests that further attention should be devoted to learning about teachers' use of problem-solving-oriented mathematics curricula. Such inquiry could inform the increasing development and use of problem-solving-oriented curricula.     

Developing Interdisciplinary Units: A Strategy Based on Problem Solving

While the benefits of the interdisciplinary unit are well documented, it presents a complex challenge to teachers in the natural and social sciences, mathematics, and humanities. Teachers must become active curriculum designers who shape and edit the curriculum according to students' needs. This paper describes knowledge for teachers as curriculum designers and a framework for interdisciplinary unit development. The framework addresses a metacurricular process (problem solving) that will be the unit centerpiece, the development of this central process related to the learner, and the tasks that teach explicit learning and thinking skills attached to the central process. An example of the framework in action is also described. As the faculty and curriculum coordinators for an innovative summer academy for minority students in northern Arizona have used this framework, they have evolved from a group that created a good idea to interest students with parallel subject development in separate classrooms to humanities/mathematics/science teams united in one team/classroom, in which content is integrated through the actions of the problem solving process.     

Processes and Pathways: How Do Mathematics and Science Partnerships Measure and Promote Growth in Teacher Content Knowledge?

Intense focus on student achievement results in mathematics and science has brought about claims that K‐12 teachers should be better prepared to teach basic concepts in these disciplines. The focus on teachers' mathematics and science content knowledge has been met by efforts to increase teacher knowledge through funded national initiatives focusing on mathematics and science. The purpose of the present study was to look across projects in the National Science Foundation's Math and Science Partnership Program to determine how partnerships developed processes for measuring growth in teacher content knowledge. Pre‐ and post‐testing was the most common process for measuring growth in content knowledge, with 63% of the mathematics and 78% of the science teachers showing significant gains in content knowledge. A notable difference was found between teacher outcomes when the Learning Mathematics for Teaching instrument was used in comparison with the use of other instruments measuring teacher content knowledge growth. Results revealed two pathways for promoting teacher content knowledge growth: content explicit, where the goal of growth in teacher content knowledge was explicit in the activity, and content embedded, where the goal of growth in teacher content knowledge was embedded in the activity. As a result of the analysis, a framework demonstrating the interrelationships among processes and pathways was developed. ¹