Size Ramsey numbers for some regular graphs

P. Erdös, R.J. Faudree, C.C. Rousseau and R.H. Schelp [P. Erdös, R.J. Faudree, C.C. Rousseau, R.H. Schelp, The size Ramsey number, Period. Math. Hungar. 9 (1978) 145-161] studied the asymptotic behaviour of for certain graphs G,H. In this paper there will be given a lower bound for the diagonal size Ramsey number of K_n,n,n. The result is a generalization of a theorem for K_n,n given by P. Erdös and C.C. Rousseau [P. Erdös, C.C. Rousseau, The size Ramsey numbers of a complete bipartite graph, Discrete Math. 113 (1993) 259-262].Moreover, an open question for bounds for size Ramsey number of each n-regular graph of order n+t for t>n−1 is posed.     

Linear Ramsey numbers of sparse graphs

The Ramsey number R(G₁,G₂) of two graphs G₁ and G₂ is the least integer p so that either a graph G of order p contains a copy of G₁ or its complement G^c contains a copy of G₂. In 1973, Burr and Erd?s offered a total of $25 for settling the conjecture that there is a constant c = c(d) so that R(G,G)≤ c|V(G)| for all d‐degenerate graphs G, i.e., the Ramsey numbers grow linearly for d‐degenerate graphs. We show in this paper that the Ramsey numbers grow linearly for degenerate graphs versus some sparser graphs, arrangeable graphs, and crowns for example. This implies that the Ramsey numbers grow linearly for degenerate graphs versus graphs with bounded maximum degree, planar graphs, or graphs without containing any topological minor of a fixed clique, etc. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory     

Proof of a conjecture on fractional Ramsey numbers

Jacobson, Levin, and Scheinerman introduced the fractional Ramsey function r_f (a₁, a₂, …, a_k) as an extension of the classical definition for Ramsey numbers. They determined an exact formula for the fractional Ramsey function for the case k=2. In this article, we answer an open problem by determining an explicit formula for the general case k>2 by constructing an infinite family of circulant graphs for which the independence numbers can be computed explicitly. This construction gives us two further results: a new (infinite) family of star extremal graphs which are a superset of many of the families currently known in the literature, and a broad generalization of known results on the chromatic number of integer distance graphs. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 63: 164–178, 2010     

On the complete chromatic number of Halin graphs

ThisresearchissupportedbytheNationalNaturalScienceFoundationofChina.Write.1.IntroductionDefinition1.FOrany3-connectedplanargraphG(V,E,F)withA(G)23,iftheboundaryedgesoffacefowhichisadjacenttotheothersareremoved,itbecomesatree,andthedegreeofeachvertexofV(fo)is3,andthenGiscalledaHalingraph;foiscalledtheouterfaceofG,andtheotherscalledtheinteriorfaces,thevenicesonthefacefoarecalledtheoutervenices,theoillersarecalledtheinterior...ti..,tll.ForanyplanargraphG(V,E,F),f,f'eF,fisadjacenttof'ifan…     

Anti‐Ramsey numbers of doubly edge‐critical graphs

Given a graph H and a positive integer n, Anti‐Ramsey number AR(n, H) is the maximum number of colors in an edge‐coloring of K_n that contains no polychromatic copy of H. The anti‐Ramsey numbers were introduced in the 1970s by Erd?s, Simonovits, and Sós, who among other things, determined this function for cliques. In general, few exact values of AR(n, H) are known. Let us call a graph H doubly edge‐critical if χ(H?e)≥p+ 1 for each edge e∈E(H) and there exist two edges e₁, e₂ of H for which χ(H?e₁?e₂)=p. Here, we obtain the exact value of AR(n, H) for any doubly edge‐critical H when n?n₀(H) is sufficiently large. A main ingredient of our proof is the stability theorem of Erd?s and Simonovits for the Turán problem. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 61: 210–218, 2009     

List Ramsey numbers

We introduce a list‐coloring extension of classical Ramsey numbers. We investigate when the two Ramsey numbers are equal, and in general, how far apart they can be from each other. We find graph sequences where the two are equal and where they are far apart. For $?$‐uniform cliques we prove that the list Ramsey number is bounded by an exponential function, while it is well known that the Ramsey number is superexponential for uniformity at least 3. This is in great contrast to the graph case where we cannot even decide the question of equality for cliques.     

New bounds for the distance Ramsey number

In this paper we study the distance Ramsey number $R_D(s,t,d)$. The distance Ramsey number $R_D(s,t,d)$ is the minimum number $n$ such that for any graph $G$ on $n$ vertices, either $G$ contains an induced $s$-vertex subgraph isomorphic to a distance graph in ${\mathbb{R}}^d$ or $\stackrel{?}{G}$ contains an induced $t$-vertex subgraph isomorphic to the distance graph in ${\mathbb{R}}^d$. We obtain the upper and lower bounds on $R_D(s,s,d)$, which are similar to the bounds for the classical Ramsey number $R(?\frac{s}{[d/2]}?,?\frac{s}{[d/2]}?)$.     

Star-critical Ramsey numbers

The graph Ramsey numberR(G,H) is the smallest integer r such that every 2-coloring of the edges of K_r contains either a red copy of G or a blue copy of H. We find the largest star that can be removed from K_r such that the underlying graph is still forced to have a red G or a blue H. Thus, we introduce the star-critical Ramsey numberr_∗(G,H) as the smallest integer k such that every 2-coloring of the edges of K_r−K_1,r−1−k contains either a red copy of G or a blue copy of H. We find the star-critical Ramsey number for trees versus complete graphs, multiple copies of K₂ and K₃, and paths versus a 4-cycle. In addition to finding the star-critical Ramsey numbers, the critical graphs are classified for R(T_n,K_m), R(nK₂,mK₂) and R(P_n,C₄).     

Size bipartite Ramsey numbers

Let B, B₁ and B₂ be bipartite graphs, and let B→(B₁,B₂) signify that any red-blue edge-coloring of B contains either a red B₁ or a blue B₂. The size bipartite Ramsey number is defined as the minimum number of edges of a bipartite graph B such that B→(B₁,B₂). It is shown that is linear on n with m fixed, and is between c₁n²2ⁿ and c₂n³2ⁿ for some positive constants c₁ and c₂.     

ContributionsChromatic Ramsey numbers

Suppose G is a graph. The chromatic Ramsey number r_c(G) of G is the least integer m such that there exists a graph F of chromatic number m for which the following is true: for any 2-colouring of the edges of F there is a monochromatic subgraph isomorphic to G. Let M_n = min[r_c(G): χ(G) = n]. It was conjectured by Burr et al. (1976) that M_n = (n − 1)² + 1. This conjecture has been confirmed previously for n 4. In this paper, we shall prove that the conjecture is true for n = 5. We shall also improve the upper bounds for M₆ and M₇.     

CO‐irredundant Ramsey numbers for graphs

The study of the CO‐irredundant Ramsey numbers t(n₁, ···, n_k) is initiated. It is shown that several values and bounds for these numbers may be obtained from the well‐studied generalized graph Ramsey numbers and the values of t(4, 5), t(4, 6) and t(3, 3, m) are calculated. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Graph Theory 34: 258–268, 2000     

Integral distance graphs

Suppose D is a subset of all positive integers. The distance graph G(Z, D) with distance set D is the graph with vertex set Z, and two vertices x and y are adjacent if and only if |x − y| ≡ D. This paper studies the chromatic number χ(Z, D) of G(Z, D). In particular, we prove that χ(Z, D) ≤ |D| + 1 when |D| is finite. Exact values of χ(G, D) are also determined for some D with |D| = 3. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Graph Theory 25: 287–294, 1997