超分子有序聚集凝固液相微萃取及其对五味子中木脂素类化合物的测定及质量评价

通过分析比较漂浮有机液滴凝固液相微萃取(SFODLPME)对木脂素类化合物萃取前后紫外光谱的变化, 提出了超分子有序聚集凝固液相微萃取(SSMOALPME)机理; 建立了简单、 快速、 灵敏的SSMOALPME高效液相色谱法(HPLC)同时测定中药五味子中5种低丰度木脂素类化合物含量的方法, 并对不同产地五味子的质量进行比较和评价. 在最佳的SSMOALPME条件下, 测得五味子醇甲, 五味子酯甲, 五味子甲素, 五味子乙素和五味子丙素的线性范围分别为2.48×10^-3~6.21, 2.27×10^-3~28.5, 2.31×10^-3~28.8, 2.27×10^-3~5.69和1.05×10^-3~5.25 μg/mL; 检出限分别为0.4, 0.4, 0.4, 0.08和0.08 ng/mL; 日内及日间精密度RSD<9.7%; 药材中分析物的回收率为91.9% ~104.7%; SSMOALPME对5种分析物的富集倍数分别在39 ~529倍之间. 本法测定结果与药典法测定结果相比无显著差异(P=95%). SSMOALPME方法的提出为液相微萃取的理论研究奠定了基础, 为反映中药多成分、 多靶点及协同作用的特性, 建立科学的质量控制方法提供了理论依据和实验基础.     

凝固漂浮有机液滴-分散液液微萃取-高效液相色谱-串联质谱法测定海水中苯并三唑类紫外线过滤剂

建立了海水中7种苯并三唑类紫外线过滤剂的凝固漂浮有机液滴-分散液液微萃取-高效液相色谱-串联质谱分析方法。优化后的萃取实验条件：20 μL十二醇为萃取溶剂,400 μL甲醇为分散溶剂,NaCl质量分数为8%,pH小于6,涡旋振荡时间2 min。目标化合物经Hypersil GOLD色谱柱（150 mm×2.1 mm,5 μm）结合甲醇-水梯度洗脱分离后,用正离子多反应监测模式进行质谱分析。在较宽的线性范围内,7种化合物的线性相关系数（r²）均大于0.99;基质加标回收率为68.3%~127.5%,相对标准偏差为0.9%~15.2%,方法的检出限为0.001~0.090 μg/L,定量限为0.003~0.300 μg/L。将建立的方法用于大连8个海滨浴场海水中苯并三唑类紫外线过滤剂的测定,部分浴场海水有不同程度的检出。该方法简便、快速、环境友好、灵敏度高,可用于海水中苯并三唑类紫外线过滤剂的分析检测。     

凝固漂浮有机液滴-分散液液微萃取结合高效液相色谱法同时测定地表水中多环芳烃和酞酸酯

多环芳烃和酞酸酯是国际公认的优控污染物,因此准确快速地测定水中多环芳烃和酞酸酯非常重要。凝固漂浮有机液滴-分散液液微萃取(DLLME-SFO)是一种简便、快速、环境友好、灵敏度高的样品前处理技术。采用DLLME-SFO同时测定地表水中多环芳烃和酞酸酯的分析方法鲜有报道。该文采用凝固漂浮有机液滴-分散液液微萃取富集技术,结合高效液相色谱紫外/荧光法,建立了同时测定地表水中16种多环芳烃和6种酞酸酯的分析方法。考察优化了影响萃取效率的主要因素,包括萃取剂的种类和用量、分散剂的种类和用量、萃取时间和离子强度等。优化后的萃取实验条件为:5.0 mL水样,10μL十二醇为萃取溶剂,500μL甲醇为分散溶剂,涡旋振荡时间2 min,氯化钠用量0.2 g。目标化合物经多环芳烃专用色谱柱(SUPELCOSIL^TM LC-PAH, 150 mm×4.6 mm, 5μm)结合乙腈-水梯度洗脱分离,16种多环芳烃除苊烯外采用荧光检测,苊烯和6种酞酸酯采用紫外检测,外标法定量。结果表明,22种目标化合物的基质加标回收率为60.2%～113.5%,相对标准偏差为1.9%～14.3%;多环芳...     

凝固漂浮有机液滴-分散液液微萃取结合高效液相色谱法同时测定自来水中氯代多环芳烃与多环芳烃

建立了自来水中6种氯代多环芳烃和15种多环芳烃的凝固漂浮有机液滴-分散液液微萃取高效液相色谱分析方法,并探讨了萃取剂种类和用量、分散剂种类和用量、氯化钠含量及涡旋振荡时间等因素对萃取效率的影响。优化后的萃取实验条件为:10μL十二醇为萃取溶剂,500μL甲醇为分散溶剂,6%NaCl,涡旋振荡时间2 min。目标化合物经多环芳烃专用柱(SUPELCOSILTMLC-PAH,150 mm×4.6 mm,5μm)分离后,外标法定量。结果表明,21种目标化合物在一定质量浓度范围内线性良好,相关系数均不低于0.999;在低、中、高3个加标水平下的回收率为70.6%～98.7%,相对标准偏差(RSD)为2.0%～10%;方法的检出限(LOD,S/N=3)为0.000 7～0.009μg/L,定量下限(LOQ,S/N=10)为0.002 2～0.028μg/L。可用于自来水中氯代多环芳烃和多环芳烃的分析检测。     

漂浮液滴固化分散液液微萃取与高效液相色谱联用检测环境水样中的3种烷基苯酚

建立了漂浮液滴固化分散液液微萃取(DLLME-SFO)方法,以脂肪酸作为萃取剂,以甲醇作为分散剂,与高效液相色谱联用检测了环境水样中3种烷基苯酚。对影响前处理方法的因素进行了详细考察,在最佳萃取条件(60μL萃取剂辛酸、600μL分散剂甲醇、pH值为2.0~8.0、10 mL水样中加入0.5 g NaCl)下,3种烷基苯酚在20~1 500μg/L范围内具有良好的线性关系,相关系数不小于0.998 5,3种目标化合物的检出限为0.45~0.61μg/L,富集倍数为145~169,实际样品中3个水平的加标回收率为80.1%~109.9%。该方法将脂肪酸作为萃取剂,与HPLC联用实现了烷基苯酚的富集与检测,为环境水样中烷基苯酚的检测提供了对环境友好的前处理新方法。     

凝固-漂浮分散液液微萃取-高效液相色谱法测定水样中氯酚

采用凝固-漂浮分散液液微萃取(SFO-DLLME)-高效液相色谱法测定水样中3种氯酚.以密度小于水,且凝固点为24 ℃的1-十二醇为萃取剂,甲醇为分散剂,对水样进行分散液液微萃取.将混合液离心,再通过冷冻凝固操作使漂浮的萃取剂和水相分离,萃取剂复溶后进样测定.本实验确定的最佳实验条件为:萃取剂200 μL、分散剂300 μL、1.2 g NaCl、1 mol/L H3PO4 200 μL、样品体积8.0 mL、萃取时间3 min.3种氯酚测定的线性范围为0.05～6.0 mg/L;检出限为20～38 μg/L.应用本方法分析实际水样,加标回收率在90.11%～107.7%之间;日间相对标准偏差在3.5%～4.6%之间.本方法扩展了分散液液微萃取萃取剂的选择范围,具有简便、快速、准确、环境友好等特点.     

液相微萃取-高效液相色谱法分析葡萄汁中多酚类化合物

建立了一种基于液相微萃取与高效液相色谱联用技术测定葡萄汁中鞣花酸、白藜芦醇和槲皮素的分析方法. 比较了单液滴液相微萃取和中空纤维液相微萃取两种萃取模式, 选择了单液滴液相微萃取作为3种多酚类化合物的液相微萃取模式. 考察了搅拌速度、萃取时间、料液相pH和料液相离子强度的影响. 鞣花酸、白藜芦醇和槲皮素的富集倍数分别为48.4、 79.4和155.8, 方法的线性范围为0.0050～5.0 μg/mL, 鞣花酸、白藜芦醇和槲皮素的检出限分别为0.015, 0.0020, 0.0080 μg/mL, 相对标准偏差分别为2.0%, 1.8%和1.7%. 用于实际样品葡萄汁的分析, 加标回收率在81.9%～102.3%之间.     

离子液体分散液相微萃取对苯丙烯酸类化合物的浓缩及作用机制

研究了离子液体分散液相微萃取(ILDLPME)机理, 建立了简单、快速、灵敏的ILDLPME-HPLC(高效液相色谱)同时测定中药白附子中5种低丰度苯丙烯酸类化合物含量的方法, 对不同产地白附子的质量进行了比较和评价. 在最佳的ILDLPME-HPLC条件下, 测得咖啡酸的线性范围为1.28×10^-3~2.60 μg/mL, 对羟基桂皮酸及阿魏酸的线性范围为1.28×10^-4~2.60 μg/mL, 桂皮酸及对甲氧基桂皮酸的线性范围为1.28×10^-3~4.00 μg/mL, 检出限分别为0.13, 0.01, 0.01, 0.13和0.13 ng/mL, 日内精密度RSD<7.9%, 日间精密度RSD<9.7%, 药材中分析物的回收率在86.9%~112.6%之间, ILDLPME 对5种分析物的富集倍数分别在56.0~159.3倍之间. 结合5种苯丙烯酸类化合物ILDLPME萃取前后紫外光谱的变化, 提出了ILDLPME萃取苯丙烯酸羧基-离子液体电荷转移超分子(CTSMCIL)机理. 本研究为建立中药白附子的质量控制方法提供了理论依据和实验基础.     

液相微萃取/后萃取技术在中药苯丙酸类化合物分析中的应用

初步阐明了液相微萃取/后萃取(LPME/BE)在苯丙酸类化合物中的萃取机理;建立了浓缩倍数与模型化合物分配系数及理化参数之间的关系.利用自制的液相微萃取装置,优化了LPME/BE条件:以聚偏氟乙烯纤维(MOF503)为溶剂载体,正庚醇为萃取剂,pH 3.0的HCl分析物水溶液为供相,pH 11.7的NaOH为接受相,搅拌速度为1800 r/min,萃取时间为60 min.萃取完成后经HPLC分析.模型化合物浓缩倍数EF与其正庚醇/水表观油水分配系数logP有良好线性,R2=0.9653.测得该方法的RSD内＜6.3%,RSD间＜6.6%;检出限为咖啡酸0.025 μg/L;阿魏酸0.250 μg/L;对羟基桂皮酸0.004 μg/L;对甲氧基桂皮酸0.100 μg/L;桂皮酸0.050 μg/L.双黄连口服液中咖啡酸平均回收率为100.3%;浓缩当归丸中阿魏酸平均回收率为99.2%;桂枝茯苓丸中桂皮酸平均回收率为99.4%.本法操作简便、快速、环境友好,能有效去除中药样品中复杂机体的干扰.     

基于中空纤维液相微萃取的麻黄碱和伪麻黄碱优势构象的确定及含量测定

利用中空纤维液相微萃取方法(HF-LPME)分析麻黄碱和伪麻黄碱在不同基质中的优势构象,阐明了麻黄碱和伪麻黄碱的萃取机理;结合高效液相色谱(HPLC)建立了微量麻黄碱和伪麻黄碱的分离测定方法。以聚偏氟乙烯中空纤维为有机溶剂载体,正己醇为萃取溶剂,麻黄碱和伪麻黄碱的NaOH(5 mol/L)溶液为样品相,0.01 mol/L H2SO4溶液为接收相,在1200 r/min转速下萃取35 min,收集萃取液直接进行HPLC分析。麻黄碱和伪麻黄碱在水溶液中的线性范围为5～100 μg/L,检出限分别为1.9 μg/L和1.2 μg/L,富集倍数分别为38和61倍,平均回收率分别为100.6%±1.2%和103.2%±3.5%;在鼠尿液中的线性范围为100～5×104 μg/L,检出限分别为30 μg/L和42 μg/L,富集倍数分别为20和17倍,平均回收率分别为108.4%±4.4%和106.1%±5.4%。研究表明该方法操作简单,选择性高,适用于微量麻黄碱的含量测定和分析。     

悬浮固化分散液液微萃取-毛细管电泳法测定水中磺酰脲类除草剂

建立了悬浮固化分散液液微萃取-毛细管电泳法同时测定水中磺酰脲类除草剂残留的方法。以十二醇为萃取剂、甲醇为分散剂,采用悬浮固化分散液液微萃取技术对水样进行分离提取,并结合毛细管电泳法进行测定。该方法可以有效提取、分离、检测水中残留的微量苯磺隆、吡嘧磺隆、苄嘧磺隆等9种磺酰脲类除草剂,各待测物在10.0~1000 μg/L范围内线性关系良好,相关系数r≥0.992,方法检出限为2.40~7.50 μg/L,方法精密度为6.55%~13.9%。将该方法用于实际水样的测定,取得了较满意的结果,加标回收率为82.0%~104%。该方法简便快速,适合水中磺酰脲类除草剂的同时测定。     

Extraction and determination of polybrominated diphenyl ethers in water and urine samples using solidified floating organic drop microextraction along with high performance liquid chromatography

We have developed a method, termed solidification of floating organic drop microextraction (SFOME), for the extraction of polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) in water and urine samples, this followed by quantification via HPLC. This method requires very small quantities of organic solvent consumption. It is based on exposing a floating solidified drop of an organic solvent on the surface of aqueous solution in a sealed vial. The organic drop is easily collected with a spatula, molten (at ambient temperature), and then submitted to HPLC. Experimental parameters including extraction solvent and its volume, disperser solvent and its volume, extraction time, ionic strength, stirring speed and extraction temperature were optimized. The enrichment factors of analytes are in the range from 921 to 1,462, and acceptable extraction recoveries (92%–118%) are obtained. The dynamic linear range for five PBDE congeners is in the range of 0.5–75?μg.L^?1 and from 5 to 500?μg.L^?1 for BDE 209. The correlation coefficients range from 0.9960 to 0.9999. The limits of detection (at S/N?=?3) for PBDE congeners vary between 0.01 and 0.04?μg.L^?1. This method has been successfully applied to detecting PBDEs in two environmental waters and in human urine.

Preconcentration of organochlorine pesticides in aqueous samples by dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction based on solidification of floating organic drop after SPE with multiwalled carbon nanotubes

SPE joined with dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction based on solidification of floating organic drop (DLLME‐SFO) as a novel technique combined with GC with electron‐capture detection has been developed as a preconcentration technique for the determination of organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) in water samples. Aqueous samples were loaded onto multiwalled carbon nanotubes as sorbent. After the elution of the desired compounds from the sorbent by using acetone, the DLLME‐SFO technique was performed on the obtained solution. Variables affecting the performance of both steps such as sample solution flow rate, breakthrough volume, type and volume of the elution, type and volume of extraction solvent and salt addition were studied and optimized. The new method provided an ultra enrichment factor (8280–28221) for nine OCPs. The calibration curves were linear in the range of 0.5–1000 ng/L, and the LODs ranged from 0.1–0.39 ng/L. The RSD, for 0.01 μg/L of OCPs, was in the range of 1.39–13.50% (n = 7). The recoveries of method in water samples were 70–113%.     

Dispersion‐solidification liquid–liquid microextraction for volatile aromatic hydrocarbons determination: Comparison with liquid phase microextraction based on the solidification of a floating drop

Two microextraction techniques – liquid phase microextraction based on solidification of a floating organic drop (LPME‐SFO) and dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction combined with a solidification of a floating organic drop (DLLME‐SFO) – are explored for benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and o‐xylene sampling and preconcentration. The investigation covers the effects of extraction solvent type, extraction and disperser solvents' volume, and the extraction time. For both techniques 1‐undecanol containing n‐heptane as internal standard was used as an extracting solvent. For DLLME‐SFO acetone was used as a disperser solvent. The calibration curves for both techniques and for all the analytes were linear up to 10 μg/mL, correlation coefficients were in the range 0.997–0.998, enrichment factors were from 87 for benzene to 290 for o‐xylene, detection limits were from 0.31 and 0.35 μg/L for benzene to 0.15 and 0.10 μg/L for o‐xylene for LPME‐SFO and DLLME‐SFO, respectively. Repeatabilities of the results were acceptable with RSDs up to 12%. Being comparable with LPME‐SFO in the analytical characteristics, DLLME‐SFO is superior to LPME‐SFO in the extraction time. A possibility to apply the proposed techniques for volatile aromatic hydrocarbons determination in tap water and snow was demonstrated.     

Dispersive solid‐phase extraction followed by vortex‐assisted dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction based on the solidification of a floating organic droplet for the determination of benzoylurea insecticides in soil and sewage sludge

A novel dispersive solid‐phase extraction combined with vortex‐assisted dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction based on solidification of floating organic droplet was developed for the determination of eight benzoylurea insecticides in soil and sewage sludge samples before high‐performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection. The analytes were first extracted from the soil and sludge samples into acetone under optimized pretreatment conditions. Clean‐up of the extract was conducted by dispersive solid‐phase extraction using activated carbon as the sorbent. The vortex‐assisted dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction based on solidification of floating organic droplet procedure was performed by using 1‐undecanol with lower density than water as the extraction solvent, and the acetone contained in the solution also acted as dispersive solvent. Under the optimum conditions, the linearity of the method was in the range 2–500 ng/g with correlation coefficients (r) of 0.9993–0.9999. The limits of detection were in the range of 0.08–0.56 ng/g. The relative standard deviations varied from 2.16 to 6.26% (n = 5). The enrichment factors ranged from 104 to 118. The extraction recoveries ranged from 81.05 to 97.82% for all of the analytes. The good performance has demonstrated that the proposed methodology has a strong potential for application in the multiresidue analysis of complex matrices.     

A novel dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction based on solidification of floating organic droplet method for determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in aqueous samples

A new dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction based on solidification of floating organic droplet method (DLLME-SFO) was developed for the determination of five kinds of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in environmental water samples. In this method, no specific holder, such as the needle tip of microsyringe and the hollow fiber, is required for supporting the organic microdrop due to the using of organic solvent with low density and proper melting point. Furthermore, the extractant droplet can be collected easily by solidifying it in the lower temperature. 1-Dodecanol was chosen as extraction solvent in this work. A series of parameters that influence extraction were investigated systematically. Under optimal conditions, enrichment factors (EFs) for PAHs were in the range of 88-118. The limit of detections (LODs) for naphthalene, diphenyl, acenaphthene, anthracene and fluoranthene were 0.045, 0.86, 0.071, 1.1 and 0.66 ng mL⁻¹, respectively. Good reproducibility and recovery of the method were also obtained. Compared with the traditional liquid-phase microextraction (LPME) and dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) methods, the proposed method obtained about 2 times higher enrichment factor than those in LPME. Moreover, the solidification of floating organic solvent facilitated the phase transfer. And most importantly, it avoided using high-density and toxic solvent in the traditional DLLME method. The proposed method was successfully applied to determinate PAHs in the environmental water samples. The simple and low-cost method provides an alternative method for the analysis of non-polar compounds in complex environmental water.     

Development of Dispersive Liquid‐Liquid Microextraction Based on Solidification of Floating Organic Drop for the Determination of Trace Cobalt in Water Samples

A liquid‐phase microextraction technique was developed using dispersive liquid‐liquid microextraction based on solidification of floating organic drop combined with flame atomic absorption spectrometry, for the extraction and determination of trace amounts of cobalt in water samples. Microextraction efficiency factors, such as the type and volume of extraction and dispersive solvents, pH, extraction time, the chelating agent amount, and ionic strength were investigated and optimized. Under optimum conditions, an enrichment factor of 160 was obtained from 10.0 mL of water sample. The calibration graph was linearin the range of 1.15‐110 μg L^?1 with a detection limit of 0.35 μg L^?1. The relative standard deviation for ten replicate measurements of 10 and 100 μg L^?1 of cobalt were 3.26% and 2.57%, respectively. The proposed method was assessed through the analysis of certified reference water or recovery experiments.