Synthesis of Poly‐Aib Oligopeptides and Aib‐Containing Peptides via the ‘Azirine/Oxazolone Method’, and Their Crystal Structures

The protected poly‐Aib oligopeptides Z‐(Aib)_n‐N(Me)Ph with n=2–6 were prepared according to the ‘azirine/oxazolone method’, i.e., by coupling amino or peptide acids with 2,2,N‐trimethyl‐N‐phenyl‐2H‐azirin‐3‐amine ( 1a ) as an Aib synthon (Scheme 2). Following the same concept, the segments Z‐(Aib)₃‐OH ( 9 ) and H‐L ‐Pro‐(Aib)₃‐N(Me)Ph ( 20 ) were synthesized, and their subsequent coupling with N,N′‐dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCC)/ZnCl₂ led to the protected heptapeptide Z‐(Aib)₃‐L ‐Pro‐(Aib)₃‐N(Me)Ph ( 21 ; Scheme 3). The crystal structures of the poly‐Aib oligopeptide amides were established by X‐ray crystallography confirming the 3₁₀‐helical conformation of Aib peptides.     

The Propensity of α‐Aminoisobutyric Acid (=2‐Methylalanine; Aib) to Induce Helical Secondary Structure in an α‐Heptapeptide: A Computational Study

We present a molecular‐dynamics simulation study of an α‐heptapeptide containing an α‐aminoisobutyric acid (=2‐methylalanine; Aib) residue, Val¹‐Ala²‐Leu³‐Aib⁴‐Ile⁵‐Met⁶‐Phe⁷, and a quantum‐mechanical (QM) study of simplified models to investigate the propensity of the Aib residue to induce 3₁₀/α‐helical conformation. For comparison, we have also performed simulations of three analogues of the peptide with the Aib residue being replaced by L ‐Ala, D ‐Ala, and Gly, respectively, which provide information on the subtitution effect at C(α) (two Me groups for Aib, one for L ‐Ala and D ‐Ala, and zero for Gly). Our simulations suggest that, in MeOH, the heptapeptide hardly folds into canonical helical conformations, but appears to populate multiple conformations, i.e., C₇ and 3₁₀‐helical ones, which is in agreement with results from the QM calculations and NMR experiments. The populations of these conformations depend on the polarity of the solvent. Our study confirms that a short peptide, though with the presence of an Aib residue in the middle of the chain, does not have to fold to an α‐helical secondary structure. To generate a helical conformation for a linear peptide, several Aib residues should be present in the peptide, either sequentially or alternatively, to enhance the propensity of Aib‐containing peptides towards the helical conformation. A correction of a few of the published NMR data is reported.     

Synthesis of a Derivative of the Peptaibol‐Antibiotic Trichovirin I 1B by Means of the ‘Azirine/Oxazolone Method’

According to the earlier published synthesis of the C‐terminal nonapeptide of Trichovirin I 1B, Z‐Ser(^tBu)‐Val‐Aib‐Pro‐Aib‐Leu‐Aib‐Pro‐Leuol ( 5 ), the complete tetradecapeptide Z‐Aib‐Asn(Trt)‐Leu‐Aib‐Pro‐Ser(^tBu)‐Val‐Aib‐Pro‐Aib‐Leu‐Aib‐Pro‐Leuol ( 11b ), a protected Trichovirin I 1B, has now been prepared by means of the ‘azirine/oxazolone method’. With the exception of the N‐terminal Aib(1), all Aib residues were introduced by the coupling of the corresponding amino or peptide acids with 2,2‐dimethyl‐2H‐azirine‐3‐(N‐methyl‐N‐phenylamine) ( 1a ) and methyl N‐(2,2‐dimethyl‐2H‐azirin‐3‐yl)‐L ‐prolinate ( 3a ) as the Aib and Aib‐Pro synthons, respectively. Single crystals of two segments, i.e., the N‐terminal hexapeptide Z‐Aib‐Asn(Trt)‐Leu‐Aib‐Pro‐Ser(^tBu)‐OMe ( 23 ) and the C‐terminal octapeptide Z‐Val‐Aib‐Pro‐Aib‐Leu‐Aib‐Pro‐Leuol ( 17 ), were obtained and their structures have been established by X‐ray crystallography. Following the same strategy, the C‐terminal nonapeptide of Trichovirin I 4A, Z‐Ala‐Val‐Aib‐Pro‐Aib‐Leu‐Aib‐Pro‐Leuol ( 26 ), was also synthesized and characterized by X‐ray crystallography.     

Synthesis of Aib‐Pro Oligopeptides by Repeated Azirine Coupling with the Aib‐Pro Synthon

A new synthesis of (Aib‐Pro)_n oligopeptides (n=2, 3, and 4) via azirine coupling by using the dipeptide synthon methyl N‐(2,2‐dimethyl‐2H‐azirin‐3‐yl)‐L ‐prolinate ( 1b ; Fig. 1) is presented. The most important feature of the employed protocol is that no activation of the acid component is necessary, i.e., no additional reagents are required, and the coupling reaction is performed under mild conditions at room temperature. As an attempt to provide an answer to the question of the preferred conformation of the prepared molecules, we carried out experiments by using NMR techniques and X‐ray crystallography. For example, in the case of the hexapeptide 11 , it was possible to compare the conformations in the crystalline state and in solution. After the selective hydrolysis of the methyl ester p‐BrBz‐(Aib‐Pro)₄‐OMe ( 13 ) under basic conditions, the corresponding octapeptide acid was obtained, which was then converted into the octapeptide amide p‐BrBz‐(Aib‐Pro)₄‐NHC₆H₁₃ ( 15 ) by using standard coupling conditions and activating reagents (HOBt/TBTU/DIEA) of the peptide synthesis. The conformation of this compound, as well as those of the tetrapeptides 14 and 18 , was also established by X‐ray crystallography and in solution by NMR techniques. In the crystalline state, a β‐bend ribbon structure is the preferred conformation, and similar conformations are formed in solution.     

Synthesis and Conformational Analysis of Pentapeptides Containing Enantiomerically Pure 2,2‐Disubstituted Glycines

The synthesis and conformational analysis of model pentapeptides with the sequence Z‐Leu‐Aib‐Xaa‐Gln‐Valol is described. These peptides contain two 2,2‐disubstituted glycines (α,α‐disubstituted α‐amino acids), i.e., Aib (aminoisobutyric acid), and a series of unsymmetrically substituted, enantiomerically pure amino acids Xaa. These disubstituted amino acids were incorporated into the model peptides via the ‘azirine/oxazolone method’. Conformational analysis was performed in solution by means of NMR techniques and, in the solid state, by X‐ray crystallography. Both methods show that the backbones of these model peptides adopt helical conformations, as expected for 2,2‐disubstitued glycine‐containing peptides.     

POSS end‐linked peptide‐functionalized poly(ɛ‐caprolactone)s and their inclusion complexes with α‐cyclodextrin

In this report, we have synthesized organic/inorganic hybrid peptide–poly(?‐caprolactone) (PCL) conjugates via ring opening polymerization (ROP) of ?‐caprolactone (CL) in the presence of two sequence defined peptide initiators, namely POSS‐Leu‐Aib‐Leu‐NH₂ (POSS: polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane; Leu: Leucine; Aib: α‐aminoisobutyric acid) and OMe‐Leu‐Aib‐Leu‐NH₂. Covalent attachment of peptide segments with the PCLs were examined by ¹H and ²⁹Si NMR spectroscopy, matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry (MALDI‐TOF‐MS) and FTIR spectroscopy. Supramolecular inclusion complexations of synthesized peptide‐PCL conjugates with α‐cyclodextrin (α‐CyD) were studied to understand the effect of POSS/OMe‐peptide moieties at the PCL chain ends. Inclusion complexation of peptide‐PCL conjugates with α‐CyD produced linear polypseudorotaxane, confirmed by ¹H NMR, FTIR, powder X‐ray diffraction (PXRD), polarized optical microscopy (POM) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). Extent of α‐CyD threading onto the hybrid peptide‐PCL conjugated polymers is less than that of α‐CyD threaded onto the linear PCL. Thus, PCL chains were not fully covered by the host α‐CyD molecules due to the bulky POSS/OMe‐peptide moieties connected with the one edge of the PCL chains. PXRD experiment reveals channel like structures by the synthesized inclusion complexes (ICs). Spherulitic morphologies of POSS/OMe‐peptide‐PCL conjugates were fully destroyed after inclusion complexation with α‐CyD and tiny nanoobjects were produced. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2016 , 54, 3643–3651.     

Conformational Study of Heteropentapeptides Containing an α‐Ethylated α,α‐Disubstituted Amino Acid: (S)‐Butylethylglycine (=2‐Amino‐2‐ethylhexanoic Acid) within a Sequence of Dimethylglycine (=2‐Aminoisobutyric Acid) Residues

Heteropentapeptides containing the α‐ethylated α,α‐disubstituted amino acid (S)‐butylethylglycine and four dimethylglycine residues, i.e., CF₃CO‐[(S)‐Beg]‐(Aib)₄‐OEt ( 4 ) and CF₃CO‐(Aib)₂‐[(S)‐Beg]‐(Aib)₂‐OEt ( 7 ), were synthesized by conventional solution methods. In the solid state, the preferred conformation of 4 was shown to be both a right‐handed (P) and a left‐handed (M) 3₁₀‐helical structure, and that of 7 was a right‐handed (P) 3₁₀‐helical structure. IR, CD, and ¹H‐NMR spectra revealed that the dominant conformation of both 4 and 7 in solution was the 3₁₀‐helical structure. These conformations were also supported by molecular‐mechanics calculations.     

Novel N‐(2,2‐Dimethyl‐2H‐azirin‐3‐yl)‐L‐prolinates as Aib‐Pro Synthons

The syntheses of phenacyl N‐(2,2‐dimethyl‐2H‐azirin‐3‐yl)‐L ‐prolinate and allyl N‐(2,2‐dimethyl‐2H‐azirin‐3‐yl)‐L ‐prolinate are reported. Reactions of these 2H‐azirin‐3‐amine derivatives with Z‐protected amino acids have shown them to be suitable synthons for the Aib‐Pro unit in peptide synthesis. After incorporation into the peptide by means of the ‘azirine/oxazolone method’, the C‐termini of the resulting peptides were deprotected selectively with Zn in AcOH or by a mild Pd⁰‐promoted procedure, respectively.     

The achiral tetrapeptide Z‐Aib‐Aib‐Aib‐Gly‐OtBu

The title achiral peptide N‐benzyloxycarbonyl‐α‐aminoisobutyryl‐α‐aminoisobutyryl‐α‐aminoisobutyrylglycine tert‐butyl ester or Z‐Aib‐Aib‐Aib‐Gly‐OtBu (Aib is α‐aminoisobutyric acid, Z is benzyloxycarbonyl, Gly is glycine and OtBu indicates the tert‐butyl ester), C₂₆H₄₀N₄O₇, is partly hydrated (0.075H₂O) and has two different conformations which together constitute the asymmetric unit. Both molecules form incipient 3₁₀‐helices. They differ in the relative orientation of the N‐terminal protection group and at the C‐terminus. There are two 4→1 intramolecular hydrogen bonds.     

The Structural Characterization of Folded Peptides Containing the Conformationally Constrained β‐Amino Acid Residue β2,2Ac6c

Backbone alkylation has been shown to result in a dramatic reduction in the conformational space that is sterically accessible to α‐amino acid residues in peptides. By extension, the presence of geminal dialkyl substituents at backbone atoms also restricts available conformational space for β and γ residues. Five peptides containing the achiral β^2,2‐disubstituted β‐amino acid residue, 1‐(aminomethyl)cyclohexanecarboxylic acid (β^2,2Ac₆c), have been structurally characterized in crystals by X‐ray diffraction. The tripeptide Boc‐Aib‐β^2,2Ac₆c‐Aib‐OMe ( 1 ) adopts a novel fold stabilized by two intramolecular H‐bonds (C₁₁ and C₉) of opposite directionality. The tetrapeptide Boc‐[Aib‐β^2,2Ac₆c]₂‐OMe ( 2 ) and pentapeptide Boc‐[Aib‐β^2,2Ac₆c]₂‐Aib‐OMe ( 3 ) form short stretches of a hybrid αβ C₁₁ helix stabilized by two and three intramolecular H‐bonds, respectively. The structure of the dipeptide Boc‐Aib‐β^2,2Ac₆c‐OMe ( 5 ) does not reveal any intramolecular H‐bond. The aggregation pattern in the crystal provides an example of an extended conformation of the β^2,2Ac₆c residue, forming a ‘polar sheet’ like H‐bond. The protected derivative Ac‐β^2,2Ac₆c‐NHMe ( 4 ) adopts a locally folded gauche conformation about the C_β? C_α bonds (θ=?55.7°). Of the seven examples of β^2,2Ac₆c residues reported here, six adopt gauche conformations, a feature which promotes local folding when incorporated into peptides. A comparison between the conformational properties of β^2,2Ac₆c and β^3,3Ac₆c residues, in peptides, is presented. Backbone torsional parameters of H‐bonded αβ/βα turns are derived from the structures presented in this study and earlier reports.     

Synthesis,and Helix or Hairpin‐Turn Secondary Structures of ‘Mixed’ α/β‐Peptides Consisting of Residues with Proteinogenic Side Chains and of 2‐Amino‐2‐methylpropanoic Acid (Aib)

Twelve peptides, 1 – 12 , have been synthesized, which consist of alternating sequences of α‐ and β‐amino acid residues carrying either proteinogenic side chains or geminal dimethyl groups (Aib). Two peptides, 13 and 14 , containing 2‐methyl‐3‐aminobutanoic acid residues or a ‘random mix’ of α‐, β²‐, and β³‐amino acid moieties were also prepared. The new compounds were fully characterized by CD (Figs. 1 and 2), and ¹H‐ and ¹³C‐NMR spectroscopy, and high‐resolution mass spectrometry (HR‐MS). In two cases, 3 and 14 , we discovered novel types of turn structures with nine‐ and ten‐membered H‐bonded rings forming the actual turns. In two other cases, 8 and 11 , we found 14/15‐helices, which had been previously disclosed in mixed α/β‐peptides containing unusual β‐amino acids with non‐proteinogenic side chains. The helices are formed by peptides containing the amino acid moiety Aib in every other position, and their backbones are primarily not held together by H‐bonds, but by the intrinsic conformations of the containing amino acid building blocks. The structures offer new possibilities of mimicking peptide–protein and protein–protein interactions (PPI).     

The ‘Azirine/Oxazolone Approach’ to the Synthesis of Aib‐Pro Endothiopeptides

The reaction of methyl N‐(2,2‐dimethyl‐2H‐azirin‐3‐yl)‐L ‐prolinate ( 2a ) with thiobenzoic acid at room temperature gave the endothiopeptide Bz‐AibΨ[CS]‐Pro‐OMe ( 7 ) in high yield. In an analogous manner, (benzyloxy)carbonyl (Z)‐protected proline was transformed into the thioacid, which was reacted with 2a to give the endothiotripeptide Z‐Pro‐AibΨ[CS]‐Pro‐OMe ( 12 ). The corresponding thioacid of 7 was prepared in situ via saponification, formation of a mixed anhydride, and treatment with H₂S. A second reaction with 2a led to the endodithiotetrapeptide 9 , but extensive epimerization at Pro² was observed. Similarly, saponification of 12 and coupling with either 2a or H‐Phe‐OMe and 2‐(1H‐benzotriazol‐1‐yl)‐1,1,3,3‐tetramethyluronium tetrafluoroborate/1‐hydroxy‐1H‐benzotriazole (TBTU/HOBt) gave the corresponding endothiopeptides as mixtures of two epimers. The synthesis of the pure diastereoisomer BzΨ[CS]‐Aib‐Pro‐AibΨ[CS]‐N(Me)Ph ( 21 ) was achieved via isomerization of 7 to BzΨ[CS]‐Aib‐Pro‐OMe ( 16 ), transformation into the corresponding thioacid, and reaction with N,2,2‐trimethyl‐N‐phenyl‐2H‐azirin‐3‐amine ( 1a ). The structures of 12 and 21 were established by X‐ray crystallography.     

Solid‐state conformations of linear depsipeptide amides with an alternating sequence of α,α‐disubstituted α‐amino acid and α‐hydroxy acid

Depsipeptides and cyclodepsipeptides are analogues of the corresponding peptides in which one or more amide groups are replaced by ester functions. Reports of crystal structures of linear depsipeptides are rare. The crystal structures and conformational analyses of four depsipeptides with an alternating sequence of an α,α‐disubstituted α‐amino acid and an α‐hydroxy acid are reported. The molecules in the linear hexadepsipeptide amide in (S)‐Pms‐Acp‐(S)‐Pms‐Acp‐(S)‐Pms‐Acp‐NMe₂ acetonitrile solvate, C₄₇H₅₈N₄O₉·C₂H₃N, ( 3b ), as well as in the related linear tetradepsipeptide amide (S)‐Pms‐Aib‐(S)‐Pms‐Aib‐NMe₂, C₂₈H₃₇N₃O₆, ( 5a ), the diastereoisomeric mixture (S,R)‐Pms‐Acp‐(R,S)‐Pms‐Acp‐NMe₂/(R,S)‐Pms‐Acp‐(R,S)‐Pms‐Acp‐NMe₂ (1:1), C₃₂H₄₁N₃O₆, ( 5b ), and (R,S)‐Mns‐Acp‐(S,R)‐Mns‐Acp‐NMe₂, C₃₀H₃₇N₃O₆, ( 5c ) (Pms is phenyllactic acid, Acp is 1‐aminocyclopentanecarboxylic acid and Mns is mandelic acid), generally adopt a β‐turn conformation in the solid state, which is stabilized by intramolecular N—H…O hydrogen bonds. Whereas β‐turns of type I (or I′) are formed in the cases of ( 3b ), ( 5a ) and ( 5b ), which contain phenyllactic acid, the torsion angles for ( 5c ), which incorporates mandelic acid, indicate a β‐turn in between type I and type III. Intermolecular N—H…O and O—H…O hydrogen bonds link the molecules of ( 3a ) and ( 5b ) into extended chains, and those of ( 5a ) and ( 5c ) into two‐dimensional networks.     

The ‘Azirine/Oxazolone Method’ on Solid Phase: Introduction of Various α,α‐Disubstituted α‐Amino Acids

Peptides containing various α,α‐disubstituted α‐amino acids, such as α‐aminoisobutyric acid (Aib), 1‐aminocyclopentane‐1‐carboxylic acid, α‐methylphenylalanine, and 3‐amino‐3,4,5,6‐tetrahydro‐2H‐pyran‐3‐carboxylic acid have been synthesized from the N‐ to the C‐terminus by the ‘azirine/oxazolone method’ under solid‐phase conditions. In this convenient method for the synthesis of sterically demanding peptides on solid‐phase, 2H‐azirin‐3‐amines are used to introduce the α,α‐disubstituted α‐amino acids without the need for additional reagents. Furthermore, the synthesis of poly(Aib) sequences has been explored.     

Efficient Access to Enantiopure γ4‐Amino Acids with Proteinogenic Side‐Chains and Structural Investigation of γ4‐Asn and γ4‐Ser in Hybrid Peptide Helices

Hybrid peptides composed of α‐ and β‐amino acids have recently emerged as new class of peptide foldamers. Comparatively, γ‐ and hybrid γ‐peptides composed of γ⁴‐amino acids are less studied than their β‐counterparts. However, recent investigations reveal that γ⁴‐amino acids have a higher propensity to fold into ordered helical structures. As amino acid side‐chain functional groups play a crucial role in the biological context, the objective of this study was to investigate efficient synthesis of γ⁴‐residues with functional proteinogenic side‐chains and their structural analysis in hybrid‐peptide sequences. Here, the efficient and enantiopure synthesis of various N‐ and C‐terminal free‐γ⁴‐residues, starting from the benzyl esters (COOBzl) of N‐Cbz‐protected (E)‐α,β‐unsaturated γ‐amino acids through multiple hydrogenolysis and double‐bond reduction in a single‐pot catalytic hydrogenation is reported. The crystal conformations of eight unprotected γ⁴‐amino acids (γ⁴‐Val, γ⁴‐Leu, γ⁴‐Ile, γ⁴‐Thr(OtBu), γ⁴‐Tyr, γ⁴‐Asp(OtBu), γ⁴‐Glu(OtBu), and γ‐Aib) reveals that these amino acids adopted a helix favoring gauche conformations along the central C^γ? C^β bond. To study the behavior of γ⁴‐residues with functional side chains in peptide sequences, two short hybrid γ‐peptides P1 (Ac‐Aib‐γ⁴‐Asn‐Aib‐γ⁴‐Leu‐Aib‐γ⁴‐Leu‐CONH₂) and P2 (Ac‐Aib‐γ⁴‐Ser‐Aib‐γ⁴‐Val‐Aib‐γ⁴‐Val‐CONH₂) were designed, synthesized on solid phase, and their 12‐helical conformation in single crystals were studied. Remarkably, the γ⁴‐Asn residue in P1 facilitates the tetrameric helical aggregations through interhelical H bonding between the side‐chain amide groups. Furthermore, the hydroxyl side‐chain of γ⁴‐Ser in P2 is involved in the interhelical H bonding with the backbone amide group. In addition, the analysis of 87 γ⁴‐residues in peptide single‐crystals reveal that the γ⁴‐residues in 12‐helices are more ordered as compared with the 10/12‐ and 12/14‐helices.     

Synthesis and Crystal Structures of O‐2′,3′‐Cyclic Cyclopentanone and Cyclohexanone Ketals of the Cytostatic 5‐Fluorouridine

The synthesis of two O‐2′,3′‐cyclic ketals, i.e., 5 and 6 , of the cytostatic 5‐fluorouridine ( 2 ), carrying a cyclopentane and/or a cyclohexane ring, respectively, is described. The novel compounds were characterized by ¹H‐, ¹⁹F‐, and ¹³C‐NMR, and UV spectroscopy, as well as by elemental analyses. Their crystal structures were determined by X‐ray analysis. Both compounds 5 and 6 show an anti‐conformation at the N‐glycosidic bond which is biased from +ac to +ap compared to the parent nucleoside 2 . The sugar puckering is changed from ^2′E to _3′E going along with a reduction of the puckering amplitude τ_m by ca. 10–13° due to the ketalization. The conformation about the sugar exocyclic bond C(4′)? C(5′) of 5 and 6 remains unchanged, i.e., g⁺, compared with compound 2 .     

Synthesis of Enniatin‐like Cyclic Depsipeptides via ‘Direct Amide Cyclization’

The synthesis of several 18‐membered cyclodepsipeptides with an alternating sequence of α,α‐disubstituted α‐amino acids and α‐hydroxy acids (compounds 14a – 14e ) is described. The ring closure via macrolactonization was accomplished by treatment of a diluted suspension of the corresponding linear precursors 12a – 12e in toluene with HCl gas, i.e., the so‐called ‘direct amide cyclization’. The incorporation of the α,α‐disubstituted α‐amino acids was achieved via the ‘azirine/oxazolone method’ with 2H‐azirin‐3‐amines of type 6 and 9 as building blocks. The structure of the cyclic depsipeptide 14a was established by X‐ray crystallography.     

The effect of amino acid backbone length on molecular packing: crystalline tartrates of glycine, β‐alanine, γ‐aminobutyric acid (GABA) and dl‐α‐aminobutyric acid (AABA)

We report a novel 1:1 cocrystal of β‐alanine with dl ‐tartaric acid, C₃H₇NO₂·C₄H₆O₆, (II), and three new molecular salts of dl ‐tartaric acid with β‐alanine {3‐azaniumylpropanoic acid–3‐azaniumylpropanoate dl ‐tartaric acid–dl ‐tartrate, [H(C₃H₇NO₂)₂]⁺·[H(C₄H₅O₆)₂]⁻, (III)}, γ‐aminobutyric acid [3‐carboxypropanaminium dl ‐tartrate, C₄H₁₀NO₂⁺·C₄H₅O₆⁻, (IV)] and dl ‐α‐aminobutyric acid {dl ‐2‐azaniumylbutanoic acid–dl ‐2‐azaniumylbutanoate dl ‐tartaric acid–dl ‐tartrate, [H(C₄H₉NO₂)₂]⁺·[H(C₄H₅O₆)₂]⁻, (V)}. The crystal structures of binary crystals of dl ‐tartaric acid with glycine, (I), β‐alanine, (II) and (III), GABA, (IV), and dl ‐AABA, (V), have similar molecular packing and crystallographic motifs. The shortest amino acid (i.e. glycine) forms a cocrystal, (I), with dl ‐tartaric acid, whereas the larger amino acids form molecular salts, viz. (IV) and (V). β‐Alanine is the only amino acid capable of forming both a cocrystal [i.e. (II)] and a molecular salt [i.e. (III)] with dl ‐tartaric acid. The cocrystals of glycine and β‐alanine with dl ‐tartaric acid, i.e. (I) and (II), respectively, contain chains of amino acid zwitterions, similar to the structure of pure glycine. In the structures of the molecular salts of amino acids, the amino acid cations form isolated dimers [of β‐alanine in (III), GABA in (IV) and dl ‐AABA in (V)], which are linked by strong O—H…O hydrogen bonds. Moreover, the three crystal structures comprise different types of dimeric cations, i.e. (A…A)⁺ in (III) and (V), and A⁺…A⁺ in (IV). Molecular salts (IV) and (V) are the first examples of molecular salts of GABA and dl ‐AABA that contain dimers of amino acid cations. The geometry of each investigated amino acid (except dl ‐AABA) correlates with the melting point of its mixed crystal.     

Nucleosides and Oligonucleotides with Diynyl Side Chains: Base Pairing and Functionalization of 2′‐Deoxyuridine Derivatives by the Copper(I)‐Catalyzed Alkyne?Azide ‘Click’ Cycloaddition

Oligonucleotides containing the 5‐substituted 2′‐deoxyuridines 1b or 1d bearing side chains with terminal C?C bonds are described, and their duplex stability is compared with oligonucleotides containing the 5‐alkynyl compounds 1a or 1c with only one nonterminal C?C bond in the side chain. For this, 5‐iodo‐2′‐deoxyuridine ( 3 ) and diynes or alkynes were employed as starting materials in the Sonogashira cross‐coupling reaction (Scheme 1). Phosphoramidites 2b – d were prepared (Scheme 3) and used as building blocks in solid‐phase synthesis. T_m Measurements demonstrated that DNA duplexes containing the octa‐1,7‐diynyl side chain or a diprop‐2‐ynyl ether residue, i.e., containing 1b or 1d , are more stable than those containing only one triple bond, i.e., 1a or 1c (Table 3). The diyne‐modified nucleosides were employed in further functionalization reactions by using the protocol of the Cu^I‐catalyzed Huisgen–Meldal–Sharpless [2+3] cycloaddition (‘click chemistry’) (Scheme 2). An aliphatic azide, i. e., 3′‐azido‐3′‐deoxythymidine (AZT; 4 ), as well as the aromatic azido compound 5 were linked to the terminal alkyne group resulting in 1H‐1,2,3‐triazole‐modified derivatives 6 and 7 , respectively (Scheme 2), of which 6 forms a stable duplex DNA (Table 3). The Husigen–Meldal–Sharpless cycloaddition was also performed with oligonucleotides (Schemes 4 and 5).     

The peptide Z‐Aib‐Aib‐Aib‐L‐Ala‐OtBu

The title peptide, N‐benzyloxycarbonyl‐α‐aminoisobutyryl‐α‐aminoisobutyryl‐α‐aminoisobutyryl‐L‐alanine tert‐butyl ester or Z‐Aib‐Aib‐Aib‐L‐Ala‐OtBu (Aib is α‐aminoisobutyric acid, Z is benzyloxycarbonyl and OtBu indicates the tert‐butyl ester), C₂₇H₄₂N₄O₇, is a left‐handed helix with a right‐handed conformation in the fourth residue, which is the only chiral residue. There are two 4→1 intramolecular hydrogen bonds in the structure. In the lattice, molecules are hydrogen bonded to form columns along the c axis.