Comprehensive Analysis of DNA Strand Breaks at the Guanosine Site Induced by Low‐Energy Electron Attachment

To elucidate the role of guanosine in DNA strand breaks caused by low‐energy electrons (LEEs), theoretical investigations of the LEE attachment‐induced C? O σ‐bonds and N‐glycosidic bond breaking of 2′‐deoxyguanosine‐3′,5′‐diphosphate (3′,5′‐dGMP) were performed using the B3LYP/DZP++ approach. The results reveal possible reaction pathways in the gas phase and in aqueous solutions. In the gas phase LEEs could attach to the phosphate group adjacent to the guanosine to form a radical anion. However, the small vertical detachment energy (VDE) of the radical anion of guanosine 3′,5′‐diphosphate in the gas phase excludes either C? O bond cleavage or N‐glycosidic bond breaking. In the presence of the polarizable surroundings, the solvent effects dramatically increase the electron affinities of the 3′,5′‐dGDP and the VDE of 3′,5′‐dGDP^?. Furthermore, the solvent–solute interactions greatly reduce the activation barriers of the C? O bond cleavage to 1.06–3.56 kcal mol^?1. These low‐energy barriers ensure that either C_5′? O_5′ or C_3′? O_3′ bond rupture takes place at the guanosine site in DNA single strands. On the other hand, the comparatively high energy barrier of the N‐glycosidic bond rupture implies that this reaction pathway is inferior to C? O bond cleavage. Qualitative agreement was found between the theoretical sequence of the bond breaking reaction pathways in the PCM model and the ratio for the corresponding bond breaks observed in the experiment of LEE‐induced damage in oligonucleotide tetramer CGTA. This concord suggests that the influence of the surroundings in the thin solid film on the LEE‐induced DNA damage resembles that of the solvent.     

The 7‐bromo derivative of 2‐amino‐2′‐deoxytubercidin fluorinated at the sugar moiety

The title compound, 2,4‐diamino‐5‐bromo‐7‐(2‐deoxy‐2‐fluoro‐β‐d ‐arabinofuranosyl)‐7H‐pyrrolo[2,3‐d]pyrimidine, C₁₁H₁₃BrFN₅O₃, shows two conformations of the exocyclic C4′—C5′ bond, with the torsion angle γ (O5′—C5′—C4′—C3′) being 170.1 (3)° for conformer 1 (occupancy 0.69) and 60.7 (7)° for conformer 2 (occupancy 0.31). The N‐glycosylic bond exhibits an anti conformation, with χ = −114.8 (4)°. The sugar pucker is N‐type (C3′‐endo; ³T₄), with P = 23.3 (4)° and τ_m = 36.5 (2)°. The compound forms a three‐dimensional network that is stabilized by several intermolecular hydrogen bonds (N—H...O, O—H...N and N—H...Br).     

Supramolecular patterns in benzyladeninium p‐toluenesulfonate

In the title compound (systematic name: 6‐benzylamino‐7H‐purin‐3‐ium p‐toluenesulfonate), C₁₂H₁₂N₅⁺·C₇H₇O₃S⁻, the adenine moiety exists as the N³‐protonated N⁷—H tautomer. The dihedral angle between the adenine ring system and the phenyl ring is 82.76 (11)°. Two of the sulfonate O atoms form C—H...O and N—H...O hydrogen bonds with the H atoms on the N and C atoms in the 3‐ and 8‐positions, respectively, of the adenine moiety, leading to a zigzag chain. Two antiparallel zigzag chains are linked by the remaining sulfonate O atom through Hoogsteen‐site H atoms (i.e. those on the N atoms in the 6‐ and 7‐positions) of the adenine moiety, leading to a double chain. An annulus formed by a pair of inversion‐related anions and cations has been identified. An intramolecular toluenesulfonate–phenyl C—H...π interaction is also present.     

2′‐De­oxy‐2‐fluoro­tubercidin

In the title compound [systematic name: 7‐(2‐de­oxy‐β‐d ‐erythro‐pentofuranos­yl)‐2‐fluoro‐7H‐pyrrolo[2,3‐d]pyrimidin‐2‐amine], C₁₁H₁₃FN₄O₃, the conformation of the N‐glycosylic bond is between anti and high‐anti [χ = −110.2 (3)°]. The 2′‐deoxy­ribofuranosyl unit adopts the N‐type sugar pucker (₄T³), with P = 40.3° and τ_m = 39.2°. The orientation of the exocyclic C4′—C5′ bond is −ap (trans), with a torsion angle γ = −168.39 (18)°. The nucleobases are arranged head‐to‐head. The crystal structure is stabilized by four inter­molecular hydrogen bonds of types N—H⋯N, N—H⋯O and O—H⋯O.     

Five pseudopolymorphs of 6‐amino‐2‐thiouracil: absence of N—H...S hydrogen bonds

In order to study the preferred hydrogen‐bonding pattern of 6‐amino‐2‐thiouracil, C₄H₅N₃OS, (I), crystallization experiments yielded five different pseudopolymorphs of (I), namely the dimethylformamide disolvate, C₄H₅N₃OS·2C₃H₇NO, (Ia), the dimethylacetamide monosolvate, C₄H₅N₃OS·C₄H₉NO, (Ib), the dimethylacetamide sesquisolvate, C₄H₅N₃OS·1.5C₄H₉NO, (Ic), and two different 1‐methylpyrrolidin‐2‐one sesquisolvates, C₄H₅N₃OS·1.5C₅H₉NO, (Id) and (Ie). All structures contain R₂¹(6) N—H...O hydrogen‐bond motifs. In the latter four structures, additional R₂²(8) N—H...O hydrogen‐bond motifs are present stabilizing homodimers of (I). No type of hydrogen bond other than N—H...O is observed. According to a search of the Cambridge Structural Database, most 2‐thiouracil derivatives form homodimers stabilized by an R₂²(8) hydrogen‐bonding pattern, with (i) only N—H...O, (ii) only N—H...S or (iii) alternating pairs of N—H...O and N—H...S hydrogen bonds.     

2′‐Deoxy‐7‐propynyl‐7‐deaza­adenosine: a DNA duplex‐stabilizing nucleoside

In the title compound, 2′‐deoxy‐7‐propynyl‐7‐deaza­adenosine, C₁₄H₁₆N₄O₃, the torsion angle of the N‐glycosylic bond is anti [χ = −130.7 (2)°]. The sugar pucker of the 2′‐deoxy­ribo­furanosyl moiety is C2′‐endo–C3′‐exo, ²T₃ (S‐type), with P = 185.9 (2)° and τ_m = 39.1 (1)°, and the orientation of the exocyclic C4′—C5′ bond is −ap (trans). The 7‐substituted propynyl group is nearly coplanar with the heterocyclic base moiety. Mol­ecules of the nucleoside form a layered network in which the heterocyclic bases are stacked head‐to‐tail with a closest distance of 3.197 (1) Å. The crystal structure of the nucleoside is stabilized by three inter­molecular hydrogen bonds of types N—H⋯ O, O—H⋯ N and O—H⋯ O.     

Novel hydrazone derivatives of 7‐hydroxy‐3′,3′‐dimethyl‐3′H‐spiro[chromene‐2,1′‐isobenzofuran]‐8‐carbaldehyde

The structures of new oxaindane spiropyrans derived from 7‐hydroxy‐3′,3′‐dimethyl‐3′H‐spiro[chromene‐2,1′‐isobenzofuran]‐8‐carbaldehyde (SP1), namely N‐benzyl‐2‐[(7‐hydroxy‐3′,3′‐dimethyl‐3′H‐spiro[chromene‐2,1′‐isobenzofuran]‐8‐yl)methylidene]hydrazinecarbothioamide, C₂₇H₂₅N₃O₃S, (I), at 120 (2) K, and N′‐[(7‐hydroxy‐3′,3′‐dimethyl‐3′H‐spiro[chromene‐2,1′‐isobenzofuran]‐8‐yl)methylidene]‐4‐methylbenzohydrazide acetone monosolvate, C₂₇H₂₄N₂O₄·C₃H₆O, (II), at 100 (2) K, are reported. The photochromically active C_spiro—O bond length in (I) is close to that in the parent compound (SP1), and in (II) it is shorter. In (I), centrosymmetric pairs of molecules are bound by two equivalent N—H...S hydrogen bonds, forming an eight‐membered ring with two donors and two acceptors.     

7‐De­aza‐2′‐deoxy‐7‐propynyl­guanosine

The title compound, C₁₄H₁₆N₄O₄, adopts the anti conformation at the gly­cosylic bond [χ−117.1 (5)°]. The sugar pucker of the 2′‐deoxy­ribo­furan­osyl moiety is C2′‐endo–C3′‐exo, ²T₃ (S‐type). The orientation of the exocyclic C4′—C5′ bond is +sc (gauche). The propynyl group is linear and coplanar with the nucleobase moiety. The structure of the compound is stabilized by several hydrogen bonds (N—H⋯O and O—H⋯O), leading to the formation of a multi‐layered network. The nucleobases, as well as the propynyl groups, are stacked. This stacking might cause the extraordinary stability of DNA duplexes containing this compound.     

7‐Deaza‐2,8‐diaza­adenosine

In the title compound [systematic name: 4‐amino‐7‐(β‐d ‐ribofuranos­yl)‐7H‐pyrazolo[3,4‐d][1,2,3]triazine], C₉H₁₂N₆O₄, the torsion angle of the N‐glycosylic bond is high anti [χ = −83.2 (3)°]. The ribofuran­ose moiety adopts the C2′‐endo–C1′‐exo (²T₁) sugar conformation (S‐type sugar pucker), with P = 152.4° and τ_m = 35.0°. The conformation at the C4′—C5′ bond is +sc (gauche,gauche), with the torsion angle γ = 52.0 (3)°. The compound forms a three‐dimensional network that is stabilized by several hydrogen bonds (N—H⋯O, O—H⋯N and O—H⋯O).     

4,7‐Bis(4‐pyridyl­ethynyl)‐2,1,3‐benzo­thia­diazo­le and its dipyridinium diperchlorate

The title compound, C₂₀H₁₀N₄S, and its dipyridinium salt, 4,4′‐(2,1,3‐benzo­diazol‐4,7‐diyl­diethynyl)­dipyridinium diperchlorate, C₂₀H₁₂N₄S²⁺·2ClO₄^?, display bond alternation in the 2,1,3‐benzo­thia­diazo­le rings, which suggests their quinonoid character. The dipyridinium dication mol­ecules stack along the a axis and form a dimer with short S?N interheteroatom contacts [3.146 (4) Å] between the two 1,2,5‐thia­diazo­le rings. The dimer is surrounded by the perchlorate anions with which it forms a large number of intermolecular N—H?O and C—H?O hydrogen bonds.     

Hydrogen‐bonded 1,2‐bis(4‐pyridyl)ethylene and maleic acid

The title compound (systematic name: 4,4′‐ethyl­ene­dipyridinium dimaleate), C₁₂H₁₂N₂²⁺·2C₄H₃O₄^?, is a 1:2 adduct of 1,2‐bis(4‐pyridyl)­ethyl­ene (BPE) and maleic acid (MA). The interaction between the two components in the molecular complex is due to intermolecular hydrogen bonding via an N⁺—H?O^? hydrogen bond.     

N6‐Furfuryladenine (kinetin) hydrochloride

In the title compound, N⁶‐furfuryl­adenin‐3‐ium chloride, C₁₀H₁₀N₅O⁺·Cl⁻, the adenine moiety exists as the N3‐protonated N7–H tautomer. The orientation of the N6 substituent (furfuryl moiety) is distal to the imidazole ring of the adenine base. The dihedral angle between the adenine plane and the furfuryl ring plane is 76.1 (2)°. Three N—H⋯Cl hydrogen bonds are responsible for the formation of a supramolecular chain‐like pattern. These supramolecular chains are interconnected by C—H⋯Cl hydrogen bonds to form a hydrogen‐bonded sheet and a three‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded network.     

Supramolecular hydrogen‐bonding patterns in two cocrystals of the N(7)–H tautomeric form of N6‐benzoyladenine: N6‐benzoyladenine–3‐hydroxypyridinium‐2‐carboxylate (1/1) and N6‐benzoyladenine–DL‐tartaric acid (1/1)

Two novel cocrystals of the N(7)—H tautomeric form of N⁶‐benzoyladenine (BA), namely N⁶‐benzoyladenine–3‐hydroxypyridinium‐2‐carboxylate (3HPA) (1/1), C₁₂H₉N₅O·C₆H₅NO₃, (I), and N⁶‐benzoyladenine–DL‐tartaric acid (TA) (1/1), C₁₂H₉N₅O·C₄H₆O₆, (II), are reported. In both cocrystals, the N⁶‐benzoyladenine molecule exists as the N(7)—H tautomer, and this tautomeric form is stabilized by intramolecular N—H...O hydrogen bonding between the benzoyl C=O group and the N(7)—H hydrogen on the Hoogsteen site of the purine ring, forming an S(7) motif. The dihedral angle between the adenine and phenyl planes is 0.94 (8)° in (I) and 9.77 (8)° in (II). In (I), the Watson–Crick face of BA (N6—H and N1; purine numbering) interacts with the carboxylate and phenol groups of 3HPA through N—H...O and O—H...N hydrogen bonds, generating a ring‐motif heterosynthon [graph set R₂²(6)]. However, in (II), the Hoogsteen face of BA (benzoyl O atom and N7; purine numbering) interacts with TA (hydroxy and carbonyl O atoms) through N—H...O and O—H...O hydrogen bonds, generating a different heterosynthon [graph set R₂²(4)]. Both crystal structures are further stabilized by π–π stacking interactions.     

Two phosphate–imidazole complexes with and without a hydrogen‐bonded guest mol­ecule

The mol­ecular structures of the complexes imidazolium 6,6′‐di‐tert‐butyl‐4,4′‐dimethyl‐2,2′‐thio­diphenyl phosphate, C₃H₅N₂⁺·C₂₂H₂₈O₄PS⁻, (I), and imidazolium 6,6′‐di‐tert‐butyl‐4,4′‐dimethyl‐2,2′‐thio­diphenyl phosphate diisopropyl hydrazo­dicarboxyl­ate hemisolvate, C₃H₅N₂⁺·C₂₂H₂₈O₄PS⁻·0.5C₈H₁₆N₂O₄, (II), have been determined. While (I) forms the expected hydrogen‐bonded chain utilizing the two imidazole N‐bound H atoms, in (II), the substituted hydrazine solvent mol­ecule inserts itself between the chains. Compound (I) exhibits a strong N—H⋯O hydrogen bond, with an N⋯O distance of 2.603 (2) Å. The hydrazine solvent molecule in (II) lies about a twofold axis and the N‐bound H atoms are involved in bifurcated hydrogen bonds with phosphate O atoms. A C‐bound H atom of the imidazolium cation is involved in a C—H⋯O inter­action with a carbonyl O atom of the hydrazine solvent mol­ecule.     

7‐Amino‐1‐(2‐deoxy‐β‐erythro‐pentofuranosyl)‐1H‐1,2,3‐triazolo[4,5‐d]pyrimidine: an 8‐azaadenine nucleoside with the nucleobase in a syn conformation

The title compound, C₉H₁₂N₆O₃, shows a syn‐glycosylic bond orientation [χ = 64.17 (16)°]. The 2′‐deoxyfuranosyl moiety exhibits an unusual C1′‐exo–O4′‐endo (₁T⁰; S‐type) sugar pucker, with P = 111.5 (1)° and τ_m = 40.3 (1)°. The conformation at the exocyclic C4′—C5′ bond is +sc (gauche), with γ = 64.4 (1)°. The two‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded network is built from intermolecular N—H...O and O—H...N hydrogen bonds. An intramolecular bifurcated hydrogen bond, with an amino N—H group as hydrogen‐bond donor and the ring and hydroxymethyl O atoms of the sugar moiety as acceptors, constrains the overall conformation of the nucleoside.     

{[(N‐Methyl‐p‐toluidino)­di­phenyl­phospho­ranyl­idene]­methyl}(N‐methyl‐p‐toluidino)­di­phenyl­phospho­nium iodide

The cationic part of the homodifunctional amino­phospho­ranyl ligand, C₄₁H₄₁N₂P₂⁺·I^?, shows interesting features associated with the N—P—C—P—N skeleton. The P—C(H) bond distances [1.696 (3) and 1.697 (3) Å] possess partial double‐bond characteristics. The nature of the P—C(H) and P—N bonds suggests that the positive charge is only distributed around the P—C—P atoms. The structure has near twofold symmetry through the central methyl­ide‐C atom.     

Water Soluble Gold(I)‐diacetyl‐1,3,5‐triaza‐7‐phosphaadamantane‐arylazoimidazole Complexes: Synthesis and Spectroscopic Study

Reaction of [Au(DAPTA)(Cl)] with RaaiR’ in CH2Cl2 medium following ligand addition leads to [Au(DAPTA)(RaaiR’)](Cl) [DAPTA＝diacetyl-1,3,5-triaza-7-phosphaadamantane, RaaiR’＝p-R-C6H4-N＝N- C3H2-NN-1-R’, (1—3), abbreviated as N,N’-chelator, where N(imidazole) and N(azo) represent N and N’, respectively; R＝H (a), Me (b), Cl (c) and R’＝Me (1), CH2CH3 (2), CH2Ph (3)]. The 1H NMR spectral measurements in D2O suggest methylene, CH2, in RaaiEt gives a complex AB type multiplet while in RaaiCH2Ph it shows AB type quartets. 13C NMR spectrum in D2O suggest the molecular skeleton. The 1H-1H COSY spectrum in D2O as well as contour peaks in the 1H-13C HMQC spectrum in D2O assign the solution structure.     

Synthesis of spiro[indoline‐3,3′‐pyrrolizines] by 1,3‐dipolar reactions between isatins,l‐proline and electron‐deficient alkenes

Two spiro[indoline‐3,3′‐pyrrolizine] derivatives have been synthesized in good yield with high regio‐ and stereospecificity using one‐pot reactions between readily available starting materials, namely l ‐proline, substituted 1H‐indole‐2,3‐diones and electron‐deficient alkenes. The products have been fully characterized by elemental analysis, IR and NMR spectroscopy, mass spectrometry and crystal structure analysis. In (1′RS ,2′RS ,3SR ,7a′SR )‐2′‐benzoyl‐1‐hexyl‐2‐oxo‐1′,2′,5′,6′,7′,7a′‐hexahydrospiro[indoline‐3,3′‐pyrrolizine]‐1′‐carboxylic acid, C₂₈H₃₂N₂O₄, (I), the unsubstituted pyrrole ring and the reduced spiro‐fused pyrrole ring adopt half‐chair and envelope conformations, respectively, while in (1′RS ,2′RS ,3SR ,7a′SR )‐1′,2′‐bis(4‐chlorobenzoyl)‐5,7‐dichloro‐2‐oxo‐1′,2′,5′,6′,7′,7a′‐hexahydrospiro[indoline‐3,3′‐pyrrolizine], which crystallizes as a partial dichloromethane solvate, C₂₈H₂₀Cl₄N₂O₃·0.981CH₂Cl₂, (II), where the solvent component is disordered over three sets of atomic sites, these two rings adopt envelope and half‐chair conformations, respectively. Molecules of (I) are linked by an O—H…·O hydrogen bond to form cyclic R ₆⁶(48) hexamers of (S ₆) symmetry, which are further linked by two C—H…O hydrogen bonds to form a three‐dimensional framework structure. In compound (II), inversion‐related pairs of N—H…O hydrogen bonds link the spiro[indoline‐3,3′‐pyrrolizine] molecules into simple R ₂²(8) dimers.     

Cocrystals of 6‐propyl‐2‐thiouracil: N—H...O versus N—H...S hydrogen bonds

In order to investigate the relative stability of N—H...O and N—H...S hydrogen bonds, we cocrystallized the antithyroid drug 6‐propyl‐2‐thiouracil with two complementary heterocycles. In the cocrystal pyrimidin‐2‐amine–6‐propyl‐2‐thiouracil (1/2), C₄H₅N₃·2C₇H₁₀N₂OS, (I), the `base pair' is connected by one N—H...S and one N—H...N hydrogen bond. Homodimers of 6‐propyl‐2‐thiouracil linked by two N—H...S hydrogen bonds are observed in the cocrystal N‐(6‐acetamidopyridin‐2‐yl)acetamide–6‐propyl‐2‐thiouracil (1/2), C₉H₁₁N₃O₂·2C₇H₁₀N₂OS, (II). The crystal structure of 6‐propyl‐2‐thiouracil itself, C₇H₁₀N₂OS, (III), is stabilized by pairwise N—H...O and N—H...S hydrogen bonds. In all three structures, N—H...S hydrogen bonds occur only within R₂²(8) patterns, whereas N—H...O hydrogen bonds tend to connect the homo‐ and heterodimers into extended networks. In agreement with related structures, the hydrogen‐bonding capability of C=O and C=S groups seems to be comparable.     

Three‐dimensional networks in bis(imidazolium) 2,2′‐dithiodibenzoate and 4‐methylimidazolium 2‐[(2‐carboxyphenyl)disulfanyl]benzoate

Cocrystallization of imidazole or 4‐methylimidazole with 2,2′‐dithiodibenzoic acid from methanol solution yields the title 2:1 and 1:1 organic salts, 2C₃H₅N₂⁺·C₁₄H₁₀O₄S₂²⁻, (I), and C₄H₇N₂⁺·C₁₄H₁₀O₄S₂⁻, (II), respectively. Compound (I) crystallizes in the monoclinic C2/c space group with the mid‐point of the S—S bond lying on a twofold axis. The component ions in (I) are linked by intermolecular N—H...O hydrogen bonds to form a two‐dimensional network, which is further linked by C—H...O hydrogen bonds into a three‐dimensional network. In contrast, by means of N—H...O, N—H...S and O—H...O hydrogen bonds, the component ions in (II) are linked into a tape and adjacent tapes are further linked by π–π, C—H...O and C—H...π interactions, resulting in a three‐dimensional network.