Host–Guest Chemistry: Oxoanion Recognition Based on Combined Charge‐Assisted C−H or Halogen‐Bonding Interactions and Anion⋅⋅⋅Anion Interactions Mediated by Hydrogen Bonds

Several bis‐triazolium‐based receptors have been synthesized and their anion‐recognition capabilities have been studied. The central chiral 1,1′‐bi‐2‐naphthol (BINOL) core features either two aryl or ferrocenyl end‐capped side arms with central halogen‐ or hydrogen‐bonding triazolium receptors. NMR spectroscopic data indicate the simultaneous occurrence of several charge‐assisted aliphatic and heteroaromatic C?H noncovalent interactions and combinations of C?H hydrogen and halogen bonding. The receptors are able to selectively interact with HP₂O₇^3?, H₂PO₄^?, and SO₄^2? anions, and the value of the association constant follows the sequence: HP₂O₇^3?>SO₄^2?>H₂PO₄^?. The ferrocenyl end‐capped 7²⁺?2 BF₄ ^? receptor allows recognition and differentiation of H₂PO₄^? and HP₂O₇^3? anions by using different channels: H₂PO₄^? is selectively detected through absorption and emission methods and HP₂O₇^3? by using electrochemical techniques. Significant structural results are the observation of an anion???anion interaction in the solid state (2:2 complex, 6²⁺? [ H₂P₂O₇ ] ^2? ), and a short C?I???O contact is observed in the structure of the complex [ 8 ²⁺][SO₄]_0.5[BF₄].     

Controlled Self‐Assembly by Mono‐p‐sulfonatocalix[n]arenes and Bis‐p‐sulfonatocalix[n]arenes

The complexation‐induced critical aggregation concentrations of 1‐pyrenemethylaminium by mono‐p‐sulfonatocalix[n]arenes and bis‐p‐sulfonatocalix[n]arenes (n=4, 5) were systemically measured by fluorescence spectroscopy. In all cases, the complexation‐induced critical aggregation concentration decreases by about 3 times upon addition of p‐sulfonatocalix[n]arenes. However, the optimal molar ratios for the aggregation of 1‐pyrenemethylaminium by mono‐p‐sulfonatocalix[n]arenes and bis‐p‐sulfonatocalix[n]arenes are distinctly different: For mono‐p‐sulfonatocalix[n]arenes, the optimum mixing ratio for the aggregation of 1‐pyrenemethylaminium is 1:4 mono‐p‐sulfonatocalix[n]arenes/1‐pyrenemethylaminium, whereas only 2.5 molecules of 1‐pyrenemethylaminium can be bound by one cavity of bis‐p‐sulfonatocalix[n]arenes. The intermolecular complexation of mono‐p‐sulfonatocalix[n]arenes and bis‐p‐sulfonatocalix[n]arenes with 1‐pyrenemethylaminium led to the formation of two distinctly different nanoarchitectures, which were shown to be nanoscale vesicle and rod aggregates, respectively, by using dynamic laser scattering, TEM, and SEM. This behavior is also different from the fiber‐like aggregates with lengths of several micrometers that were formed by 1‐pyrenemethylaminium itself above its critical aggregation concentration. Furthermore, the obtained nanoaggregates exhibit benign water solubility, self‐labeled fluorescence, and, more importantly, temperature responsiveness.     

Discriminating Halogen‐Bonding from Other Noncovalent Interactions by a Combined NOE NMR/DFT Approach

Herein a combined NOE NMR/DFT methodology to discriminate between adducts held together by halogen bonding (XB) and other noncovalent interactions (non‐XB, such as lone pair/π), based on the determination of the XB donors′ and acceptors′ relative orientation, is proposed. In particular, ¹⁹F,¹H HOESY NMR spectroscopy experiments and DFT calculations on different XB donors, such as perfluorohexyl iodide ( I1 ), iodopentafluorobenzene ( I2 ) and bromopentafluorobenzene ( Br ), combined with different Lewis bases, such as 1,4‐diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane ( DABCO ) and 2,4,6‐trimethylpyridine ( Me₃Py ), were performed. The results clearly show that in the case DABCO / I1 the XB adduct is practically the only one present in solution, whereas for the other pairs a certain amount of non‐XB adduct is present. Combining DFT and HOESY results, the amount of non‐XB adducts can be roughly quantified under our experimental conditions as 4 % for DABCO / I2 , between 10 and 20 % for Me₃Py / I1 and Me₃Py / I2 , and 44 % for DABCO / Br.     

First Principles Investigation of Noncovalent Complexation: A [2.2.2]‐Cryptand Ion‐Binding Selectivity Study

A first principles methodology, aimed at understanding the roles of molecular conformation and energetics in host–guest binding interactions, is developed and tested on a system that pushes the practical limits of ab initio methods. The binding behavior between the [2.2.2]‐cryptand host (4,7,13,16,21,24‐hexaoxa‐1,10‐diaza‐bicyclo[8.8.8]hexacosane) and alkali metal cations (Li⁺, Na⁺, and K⁺) in gas, water, methanol, and acetonitrile is characterized. Hartree–Fock and density functional theory methods are used in concert with crystallographic information to identify gas phase, energy‐minimized conformations. Gas phase free energies of binding, with vibrational contributions, are compared to solution‐state binding constants through relative binding selectivity analysis. Calculated relative binding free energies qualitatively correlated with solution state experiments only after gas phase metal desolvation is considered. The B3LYP exchange–correlation functional improves theoretical correlations with experimental relative binding free energies. The relevance of gas phase calculations towards understanding binding in condensed phases is discussed. Natural bond orbital methods highlights previously unidentified intramolecular and intermolecular M⁺(222) chemistries, such as an intramolecular n′_O→σ*_CH hydrogen bond.     

Supramolecular Recognition Influences Magnetism in [X@HVIV8VV14O54]6− Self‐Assemblies with Symmetry‐Breaking Guest Anions

Mixed‐valence polyoxovanadates(IV/V) have emerged as one of the most intricate class of supramolecular all‐inorganic host species, able to encapsulate a wide variety of smaller guest templates during their self‐assembly formation process. As showcased herein, the incorporation of guests, though governed solely by ultra‐weak electrostatic and van der Waals interactions, can cause drastic effects on the electronic and magnetic characteristics of the shell complex of the polyoxovanadate. We address the question of methodology for the magnetochemical analysis of virtually isostructural {V^IV/V₂₂O₅₄}‐type polyoxoanions of D_2d symmetry enclosing diamagnetic VO₂F₂^? (C_2v), SCN^? (C_∞v), or ClO₄^? (T_d) template anions. These induce different polarization effects related to differences in their geometric structures, symmetry, ion radii, and valence shells, eventually resulting in a supramolecular modulation of magnetic exchange between the V(3d) electrons that are partly delocalized over the {V₂₂O₅₄} shells. We also include the synthesis and characterization of the novel [V^VO₂F₂@HV^IV₈V^V₁₄O₅₄]^6? system that comprises the rarely encountered discrete difluorovanadate anion as a quasi‐isolated guest species.     

The Origin of the Room‐Temperature Stability of [TTF].+⋅⋅⋅[TTF].+ Long,Multicenter Bonds Found in Functionalized π‐[R‐TTF]22+ Dimers Included in the Cucurbit[8]uril Cavity

A computational study is performed to identify the origin of the room‐temperature stability, in aqueous solution, of functionalized π‐[R‐TTF]₂²⁺ dimers (TTF=tetrathiafulvalene; R=(CH₂OCH₂)₅CH₂OH) included in the cavity of a cucurbit[8]uril (CB[8]) molecule. π‐[R‐TTF]₂²⁺ dimers in pure water are weakly stable, and are mostly dissociated at room temperature. Upon addition of CB[8] to an aqueous π‐[R‐TTF]₂²⁺ solution, a (π‐[R‐TTF]₂?CB[8])²⁺ inclusion complex is formed. The same complex is obtained after the sequential inclusion of two [R‐TTF]^.+ monomers in the CB[8] molecule. Both processes are thermodynamically and kinetically allowed. π‐[R‐TTF]₂²⁺ dimers dissolved in pure water present a [TTF]^.+???[TTF]^.+ long, multicenter bond, similar to that already identified in π‐[TTF]₂²⁺ dimers dissolved in organic solvents. Upon their inclusion in CB[8], the strength and other features of the [TTF]^.+???[TTF]^.+ long, multicenter bond are preserved. The room temperature stability of the π‐[R‐TTF]₂²⁺ dimers included in CB[8] is shown to originate in the π‐[R‐TTF]₂²⁺???CB[8] interaction, the strength of which comes from a strongly attractive electrostatic component and a dispersion component. Such a dominant electrostatic term is caused by the strongly polarized charge distribution in CB[8], the geometrical complementarity of the π‐[R‐TTF]₂²⁺ and CB[8] geometries, and the amplifying effect of the 2+ charge in π‐[R‐TTF]₂²⁺.     

1,3‐Alternate Tetraamido‐Azacalix[4]arenes as Selective Anion Receptors

Six tetraaza[1.1.1.1]cyclophane derivatives bearing peripheral amide groups were prepared according to two distinct synthetic strategies that depend on the connection pattern between the aryl units. NMR experiments combined with the X‐ray structures of two tetraamide derivatives 4 b and 10 show that these cavitands adopt a 1,3‐alternate conformation both in solution and in the solid state. Consequently, the four amide groups of the aza[1.1.1.1]‐m,m,m,m‐cyclophane isomer 10 can contribute to the same recognition process towards neutral water molecules or anion guests. NMR experiments, mass spectrometry analyses and single‐crystal X‐ray structures confirm the anion‐binding ability of this receptor. Absorption spectrophotometric titrations in nonpolar solvents provided evidence for the selectivity of 10 to chloride anions in the halide series, with a corresponding association constant K_a reaching 2.5×10⁶ m ^?1.     

The Influence of the Framework: An Anion‐Binding Study Using Fused [n]Polynorbornanes

A series of bis‐thiourea‐functionalized [n]polynorbornane hosts ( 1 – 6 ) with increasing size were synthesized and their anion‐binding properties were evaluated by using ¹H NMR spectroscopic titration and Job’s plot analysis. The larger bis‐thiourea‐[3]polynorbornane scaffolds 4 and 5 bound acetate in a 1:1 (cooperative) arrangement, whereas the corresponding smaller norbornane host 2 , identical in preorganization, bound acetate in a 1:2 (independent) arrangement. In contrast, the size of the framework had no influence on the binding of dihydrogenphosphate. These results clearly highlight the subtle influence that the framework itself can have on host–guest interactions.     

Intermolecular Interactions in Weak Donor–Acceptor Complexes from Symmetry‐Adapted Perturbation and Coupled‐Cluster Theory: Tetracyanoethylene–Benzene and Tetracyanoethylene–p‐Xylene

The interactions in the complexes of tetracyanothylene (TCNE) with benzene and p‐xylene, often classified as weak electron donor–acceptor (EDA) complexes, are investigated by a range of quantum chemical methods including intermolecular perturbation theory at the DFT‐SAPT (symmetry‐adapted perturbation theory combined with density functional theory) level and explicitly correlated coupled‐cluster theory at the CCSD(T)‐F12 level. The DFT‐SAPT interaction energies for TCNE–benzene and TCNE–p‐xylene are estimated to be ?35.7 and ?44.9 kJ mol^?1, respectively, at the complete basis set limit. The best estimates for the CCSD(T) interaction energy are ?37.5 and ?46.0 kJ mol^?1, respectively. It is shown that the second‐order dispersion term provides the most important attractive contribution to the interaction energy, followed by the first‐order electrostatic term. The sum of second‐ and higher‐order induction and exchange–induction energies is found to provide nearly 40 % of the total interaction energy. After addition of vibrational, rigid‐rotor, and translational contributions, the computed internal energy changes on complex formation approach results from gas‐phase spectrophotometry at elevated temperatures within experimental uncertainties, while the corresponding entropy changes differ substantially.     

Supramolecular Drug Delivery Systems Based on Water‐Soluble Pillar[n]arenes

Supramolecular drug delivery systems (SDDSs), including various kinds of nanostructures that are assembled by reversible noncovalent interactions, have attracted considerable attention as ideal drug carriers owing to their fascinating ability to undergo dynamic switching of structure, morphology, and function in response to various external stimuli, which provides a flexible and robust platform for designing and developing functional and smart supramolecular nano‐drug carriers. Pillar[n]arenes represent a new generation of macrocyclic hosts, which have unique structures and excellent properties in host–guest chemistry. This account describes recent progress in our group to develop pillararene‐based stimuli‐responsive supramolecular nanostructures constructed by reversible host–guest interactions for controllable anticancer drug delivery. The potential applications of these supramolecular drug carriers in cancer treatment and the fundamental questions facing SDDSs are also discussed.

     

Orbital Effect‐Induced Anomalous Anion–π Interactions between Electron‐Rich Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Fluoride

Anion–π interactions generally exist between an anion and an electron‐deficient π‐ring because of the electron‐accepting character of the ring. In this paper, we report orbital effect‐induced anomalous binding between electron‐rich π systems and F^? through anion–π interactions calculated at the MP2/6‐31+G(d,p) and ωB97X‐D/6‐31+G(d,p) levels of theory. We find that anion–π interactions between F^? and electron‐rich π rings increase markedly with increasing number of π electrons and size of the π rings. This is contrary to intuition because anion–π interactions would be expected to gradually decrease because of gradually increasing Coulombic repulsion between the negative charge of the anions and gradually increasing number of π electrons of the aromatic surfaces. Energy decomposition analysis showed that the key to this anomalous effect is the more effective delocalization of negative charge to the unoccupied π* orbitals of larger π rings, which is termed an “orbital effect”.     

Dramatic Enhancement of Binding Affinities Between Foldamer‐Based Receptors and Anions by Intra‐Receptor π‐Stacking

As a synthetic model for intra‐protein interactions that reinforce binding affinities between proteins and ligands, the energetic interplay of binding and folding was investigated using foldamer‐based receptors capable of adopting helical structures. The receptors were designed to have identical hydrogen‐bonding sites for anion binding but different aryl appendages that simply provide additional π‐stacking within the helical backbones without direct interactions with the bound anions. In particular, the presence of electron‐deficient aryl appendages led to dramatic enhancements in the association constant between the receptor and chloride or nitrate ions, by up to three orders of magnitude. Extended stacking within the receptor contributes to the stabilization of the entire folding structure of complexes, thereby enhancing binding affinities.     

From Packed “Sandwich” to “Russian Doll”: Assembly by Charge‐Transfer Interactions in Cucurbit[10]uril

As the host possessing the largest cavity in the cucurbit[n]uril (CB[n]) family, CB[10] has previously displayed unusual recognition and assembly properties with guests but much remains to be explored. Herein, we present the recognition properties of CB[10] toward a series of bipyridinium guests including the tetracationic cyclophane known as blue box along with electron‐rich guests and detail the influence of encapsulation on the charge‐transfer interactions between guests. For the mono‐bipyridinium guest (methylviologen, MV ²⁺), CB[10] not only forms 1:1 and 1:2 inclusion complexes, but also enhances the charge‐transfer interactions between methylviologen and dihydroxynaphthalene ( HN ) by mainly forming the 1:2:1 packed “sandwich” complex (CB[10] ? 2 MV ²⁺ ?HN ). For guest 1 with two bipyridinium units, an interesting conformational switching from linear to “U” shape is observed by adding catechol to the solution of CB[10] and the guest. For the tetracationic cyclophane‐blue box, CB[10] forms a stable 1:1 inclusion complex; the two bipyridinium units tilt inside the cavity of CB[10] according to the X‐ray crystal structure. Finally, a supramolecular “Russian doll” was built up by threading a guest through the cavities of both blue box and CB[10].     

Flavylium Network of Chemical Reactions in Confined Media: Modulation of 3′,4′,7‐Trihydroxyflavilium Reactions by Host–Guest Interactions with Cucurbit[7]uril

In moderately acidic aqueous solutions, flavylium compounds undergo a pH‐, and in some cases, light‐dependent array of reversible chemical reactions. This network can be described as a single acid–base reaction involving a flavylium cation (acidic form) and a mixture of basic forms (quinoidal base, hemiketal and cis and trans chalcones). The apparent pK′_a of the system and the relative mole fractions of the basic forms can be modulated by the interaction with cucurbit[7]uril. The system is studied by using ¹H NMR spectroscopy, UV/Vis spectroscopy, flash photolysis, and steady‐state irradiation. Of all the network species, the flavylium cation possesses the highest affinity for cucurbit[7]uril. The rate of interconversion between flavylium cation and the basic species (where trans‐chalcone is dominant) is approximately nine times lower inside the cucurbit[7]uril.     

A Study of the Interaction Between Cucurbit[8]uril and Alkyl‐Substituted 4‐Pyrrolidinopyridinium Salts

The interaction between cucuribit[8]uril (Q[8]) and a series of 4‐pyrrolidinopyridinium salts bearing aliphatic substituents at the pyridinium nitrogen, namely 4‐(C₄H₈N)C₅H₅NRBr, where R=Et (g1), n‐butyl (g2), n‐pentyl (g3), n‐hexyl (g4), n‐octyl (g5), n‐dodecyl (g6), has been studied in aqueous solution by ¹H NMR spectroscopy, electronic absorption spectroscopy, isothermal titration calorimetry and mass spectrometry. Single crystal X‐ray diffraction revealed the structure of the host–guest complexes for g1, g2, g3, and g5. In each case, the Q[8] contains two guest molecules in a centrosymmetric dimer. The orientation of the guest molecule changes as the alkyl chain increases in length. Interestingly, in the solid state, the inclusion complexes identified are different from those observed in solution, and furthermore, in the case of g3, Q[8] exhibits two different interactions with the guest. In solution, the length of the alkyl chain plays a significant role in determining the type of host–guest interaction present.