On a New Idiom in the Study of Entailment

This paper is an experiment in Leibnizian analysis. The reader will recall that Leibniz considered all true sentences to be analytically so. The difference, on his account, between necessary and contingent truths is that sentences reporting the former are finitely analytic; those reporting the latter require infinite analysis of which God alone is capable. On such a view at least two competing conceptions of entailment emerge. According to one, a sentence entails another when the set of atomic requirements for the first is included in the corresponding set for the other; according to the other conception, every atomic requirement of the entailed sentence is underwritten by an atomic constituent of the entailing one. The former conception is classical on the twentieth century understanding of the term; the latter is the one we explore here. Now if we restrict ourselves to the formal language of the propositional calculus, every sentence has a finite analysis into its conjunctive normal form. Semantically, then, every sentence of that language can be represented as a simple hypergraph, H, on the powerset of a universe of states. Entailment of the sort we wish to study can be represented as a known relation, subsumption between hypergraphs. Since the lattice of hypergraphs thus ordered is a DeMorgan lattice, the logic of entailment thus understood is the familiar system, FDE of first-degree entailment. We observe that, extensionalized, the relation of subsumption is itself a DeMorgan Lattice ordered by higher-order subsumption. Thus the semantic idiom that hypergraph-theory affords reveals a hierarchy of lattices capable of representing entailments of every finite degree.     

Fuzzy inequational logic

We present a logic for reasoning about graded inequalities which generalizes the ordinary inequational logic used in universal algebra. The logic deals with atomic predicate formulas of the form of inequalities between terms and formalizes their semantic entailment and provability in graded setting which allows to draw partially true conclusions from partially true assumptions. We follow the Pavelka approach and define general degrees of semantic entailment and provability using complete residuated lattices as structures of truth degrees. We prove the logic is Pavelka-style complete. Furthermore, we present a logic for reasoning about graded if–then rules which is obtained as particular case of the general result.     

Automated prover for attribute dependencies in data with grades

We present a new axiomatization of logic for dependencies in data with grades, which includes ordinal data and data over domains with similarity relations, and an efficient reasoning method that is based on the axiomatization. The logic has its ordinary-style completeness characterizing the ordinary, bivalent entailment as well as the graded-style completeness characterizing the general, possibly intermediate degrees of entailment. A core of the method is a new inference rule, called the rule of simplification, from which we derive convenient equivalences that allow us to simplify sets of dependencies while retaining semantic closure. The method makes it possible to compute a closure of a given collection of attributes with respect to a collection of dependencies, decide whether a given dependency is entailed by a given collection of dependencies, and more generally, compute the degree to which the dependency is entailed by a collection of dependencies. We also present an experimental evaluation of the presented method.     

What is a Logic Translation?

We study logic translations from an abstract perspective, without any commitment to the structure of sentences and the nature of logical entailment, which also means that we cover both proof- theoretic and model-theoretic entailment. We show how logic translations induce notions of logical expressiveness, consistency strength and sublogic, leading to an explanation of paradoxes that have been described in the literature. Connectives and quantifiers, although not present in the definition of logic and logic translation, can be recovered by their abstract properties and are preserved and reflected by translations under suitable conditions. In memoriam Joseph Goguen     

Learning failure-free PRISM programs

PRISM is a probabilistic logic programming formalism which allows defining a probability distribution over possible worlds. This paper investigates learning a class of generative PRISM programs known as failure-free. The aim is to learn recursive PRISM programs which can be used to model stochastic processes. These programs generalise dynamic Bayesian networks by defining a halting distribution over the generative process. Dynamic Bayesian networks model infinite stochastic processes. Sampling from infinite process can only be done by specifying the length of sequences that the process generates. In this case, only observations of a fixed length of sequences can be obtained. On the other hand, the recursive PRISM programs considered in this paper are self-terminating upon some halting conditions. Thus, they generate observations of different lengths of sequences. The direction taken by this paper is to combine ideas from inductive logic programming and learning Bayesian networks to learn PRISM programs. It builds upon the inductive logic programming approach of learning from entailment.     

An anytime deduction algorithm for the probabilistic logic and entailment problems

We study two basic problems of probabilistic reasoning: the probabilistic logic and the probabilistic entailment problems. The first one can be defined as follows. Given a set of logical sentences and probabilities that these sentences are true, the aim is to determine whether these probabilities are consistent or not. Given a consistent set of logical sentences and probabilities, the probabilistic entailment problem consists in determining the range of the possible values of the probability associated with additional sentences while maintaining a consistent set of sentences and probabilities.This paper proposes a general approach based on an anytime deduction method that allows the follow-up of the reasoning when checking consistency for the probabilistic logic problem or when determining the probability intervals for the probabilistic entailment problem. Considering a series of subsets of sentences and probabilities, the approach proceeds by computing increasingly narrow probability intervals that either show a contradiction or that contain the tightest entailed probability interval. Computational experience have been conducted to compare the proposed anytime deduction method, called ad-psat with an exact one, psatcol, using column generation techniques, both with respect to the range of the probability intervals and the computing times.     

A framework for reasoning under uncertainty based on non-deterministic distance semantics

In this paper, we introduce a general and modular framework for formalizing reasoning with incomplete and inconsistent information. Our framework is composed of non-deterministic semantic structures and distance-based considerations. This combination leads to a variety of entailment relations that can be used for reasoning about non-deterministic phenomena and are inconsistency-tolerant. We investigate the basic properties of these entailments, as well as some of their computational aspects, and demonstrate their usefulness in the context of model-based diagnostic systems.     

Unifying hidden-variable problems from quantum mechanics by logics of dependence and independence

We study hidden-variable models from quantum mechanics and their abstractions in purely probabilistic and relational frameworks by means of logics of dependence and independence, which are based on team semantics. We show that common desirable properties of hidden-variable models can be defined in an elegant and concise way in dependence and independence logic. The relationship between different properties and their simultaneous realisability can thus be formulated and proven on a purely logical level, as problems of entailment and satisfiability of logical formulae. Connections between probabilistic and relational entailment in dependence and independence logic allow us to simplify proofs. In many cases, we can establish results on both probabilistic and relational hidden-variable models by a single proof, because one case implies the other, depending on purely syntactic criteria. We also discuss the ‘no-go’ theorems by Bell and Kochen-Specker and provide a purely logical variant of the latter, introducing non-contextual choice as a team-semantical property.     

Extracting BB′IW Inhabitants of Simple Types From Proofs in the Sequent Calculus {LT_\to^{t}} for Implicational Ticket Entailment

The decidability of the logic of pure ticket entailment means that the problem of inhabitation of simple types by combinators over the base { B, B′, I, W } is decidable too. Type-assignment systems are often formulated as natural deduction systems. However, our decision procedure for this logic, which we presented in earlier papers, relies on two sequent calculi and it does not yield directly a combinator for a theorem of ${T_\to}$ . Here we describe an algorithm to extract an inhabitant from a sequent calculus proof—without translating the proof into another proof system.     

模糊BIK~+-逻辑与非可换模糊逻辑(英文)

为了建立各种可换和非可换模糊逻辑的公共基础(蕴涵片段),提出了一个新的蕴涵逻辑,称为模糊BIK+-逻辑。证明了这一新的蕴涵逻辑的可靠性和弱完备性定理,同时讨论了模糊BIK+-逻辑与各种模糊逻辑之间的关系,以及与它们配套的代数结构之间的关系。     

Approaching the Alethic Modal Hexagon of Opposition

Modal logic like many others sustains a hexagon of opposition, with the two ??additional?? vertices expressing contingency and non-contingency. We first illustrate hexagons of opposition generally by treating them as cut-down entailment lattices with order distinctions among multiple arguments suppressed. We then approach the modal case by treating it heuristically as a particular case of the hexagon for quantified propositions. Historically, possibility and contingency were sometimes confused: we show using the notion of duality that contingency, as negation-symmetric, is logically less interesting than possibility.     

基于三角范数的模糊逻辑中的三Ⅰ方法

三I推理方法是一种新的模糊推理方法,通过已有的研究成果表明,在许多方面它优于传统的CRI推理方法,它将成为模糊系统和人工智能的理论和应用研究中一个比较理想的推理机制。最近,国外学者提出了一个新的模糊逻辑形式系统,叫做Monoidal t-norm based logics(简记为MTL),已经证明这个形式系统是所有基于左连续三角范数的模糊逻辑的共同形式化。本文基于这类逻辑将三I推理方法形式化,从而在这些逻辑系统中为三推理方法找到了可靠的逻辑依据。     

Sémantique de type Kripke d'un système logique basé sur un ensemble ordonné fini

In order to modelize the reasoning of intelligent agents represented by a poset T, H. Rasiowa introduced logic systems called “Approximation Logics”. In these systems the use of a set of constants constitutes a fundamental tool. We have introduced in [8] a logic system called without this kind of constants but limited to the case that T is a finite poset. We have proved a completeness result for this system w.r.t. an algebraic semantics. We introduce in this paper a Kripke‐style semantics for a subsystem of for which there existes a deduction theorem. The set of “possible worldsr is enriched by a family of functions indexed by the elements of T and satisfying some conditions. We prove a completeness result for system with respect to this Kripke semantics and define a finite Kripke structure that characterizes the propositional fragment of logic . We introduce a reational semantics (found by E. Orlowska) which has the advantage to allow an interpretation of the propositionnal logic using only binary relations. We treat also the computational complexity of the satisfiability problem of the propositional fragment of logic .     

Normal forms,linearity, and prime algebraicity over nonflat domains

Using representations of nonflat Scott domains to model type systems, it is natural to wish that they be “linear”, in which case the complexity of the fundamental test for entailment of information drops from exponential to linear, the corresponding mathematical theory becomes much simpler, and moreover has ties to models of computation arising in the study of sequentiality, concurrency, and linear logic. Earlier attempts to develop a fully nonflat semantics based on linear domain representations for a rich enough type system allowing inductive types, were designed in a way that felt rather artificial, as it featured certain awkward and counter‐intuitive properties; eventually, the focus turned on general, nonlinear representations. Here we try to turn this situation around, by showing that we can work linearly in a systematic way within the nonlinear model, and that we may even restrict to a fully linear model whose objects are in a bijective correspondence with the ones of the nonlinear and are easily seen to form a prime algebraic domain. To obtain our results we study mappings of finite approximations of objects that can be used to turn approximations into normal and linear forms.     

A complete logic forn-permutable congruence lattices

A family of logical systems, which may be regarded as extending equational logic, is studied. The equationsf=g of equational logic are generalized to congruence equivalence formulasf≡g (modx), wheref andg are terms interpreted as elements of an algebraV of some specified type. and termx is interpreted as a member of ann-permutable lattice of congruences forV. Formal concepts of proof and derivability from systems of hypotheses are developed. These proofs, like those of equational logic. require only finite algebraic processes, without manipulation of logical quantifiers or connectives. The logical systems are shown to be correct and complete: a well-formed statement is derivable from a system of hypotheses if and only if it is valid in all models of these hypotheses.     

After the fuzzy wave reached Europe

We briefly describe the situation of the fuzzy community in Europe before the fuzzy wave. We show that there was a lot of expertise in almost all subareas of fuzzy logic. Then we describe some aspects of the fuzzy wave itself, in particular fuzzy control and first generation fuzzy systems that played a role during the time the fuzzy wave reached Europe. We also make some remarks about European companies and their activities during this time. Then we discuss the situation after the fuzzy wave, some aspects of second generation fuzzy systems, the combination of fuzzy logic with other theories and techniques, and some new application areas. Finally, we will discuss the chances of fuzzy systems in Europe in the future.     

The algebra of fuzzy logic

In the following, human thinking based on premises with no complete truth value is reviewed for controlling the algebra of fuzzy sets operations. Assuming a system may be developed in this sphere, it should be considered as the algebra of fuzzy sets, as the same algebra is satisfied by classical logic and sets. As will be proved, this algebra is not a lattice and consequently the Zadeh definitions do not constitute an adequate representation. The binary operations of my algebra are “interactive” types. An axiom system is given that, in my opinion, is the foundation of the conception, adequately and without redundancy. The agreement of the theorems deduced from the axiom system with the intuitive expectations is shown. A special arithmetical structure satisfying this algebra is given, and the relation between this structure and the theory of probability is analyzed.Adapting a process of classical logics, fuzzy quantifiers are defined on the basis of the operations of propositional algebra. A “qualifier” is also defined. The qualifier is functional; applying it to Ax we get the statement “usually Ax” s a middle cource between the statements “at least once Ax” and “always Ax”. The concept of entailment of fuzzy logics is introduced. This concept is an innovative generalization of the classical deduction theory, opposite to the concept of entailment of classical multi-valued logics. An important error of the abbreviated system of notation of the fuzzy theory [e.g. m(x, AvB)] appears: the functional type operations (e.g. quantifiers) cannot be interpreted in propositional calculus. Therefore a new system of symbols is proposed in this paper.     

关于正则余剩余格与对合BCK-格

进一步研究了余剩余格的一些性质,在此基础上证明了正则余剩余格与对合BCK-格是两个等价的代数系统。所得结果将有助于深入了解正则余剩余格的代数结构,也为相关多值逻辑系统的研究提供又一途径。     

Constrained Consequence

There are various contexts in which it is not pertinent to generate and attend to all the classical consequences of a given premiss—or to trace all the premisses which classically entail a given consequence. Such contexts may involve limited resources of an agent or inferential engine, contextual relevance or irrelevance of certain consequences or premisses, modelling everyday human reasoning, the search for plausible abduced hypotheses or potential causes, etc. In this paper we propose and explicate one formal framework for a whole spectrum of consequence relations, flexible enough to be tailored for choices from a variety of contexts. We do so by investigating semantic constraints on classical entailment which give rise to a family of infra-classical logics with appealing properties. More specifically, our infra-classical reasoning demands (beyond a\modelsb{\alpha\models\beta}) that Mod(β) does not run wild, but lies within the scope (whatever that may mean in some specific context) of Mod(α), and which can be described by a sentence ·a{\bullet\alpha} with b\models·a{\beta\models\bullet\alpha}. Besides being infra-classical, the resulting logic is also non-monotonic and allows for non-trivial reasoning in the presence of inconsistencies.     

Ten questions and one problem on fuzzy logic

Recently, I had a very interesting friendly e-mail discussion with Professor Parikh on vagueness and fuzzy logic. Parikh published several papers concerning the notion of vagueness. They contain critical remarks on fuzzy logic and its ability to formalize reasoning under vagueness [10,11]. On the other hand, for some years I have tried to advocate fuzzy logic (in the narrow sense, as Zadeh says, i.e. as formal logical systems formalizing reasoning under vagueness) and in particular, to show that such systems (of many-valued logic of a certain kind) offer a fully fledged and extremely interesting logic [4, 5]. But this leaves open the question of intuitive adequacy of many-valued logic as a logic of vagueness. Below I shall try to isolate eight questions Parikh asks, add two more and to comment on all of them. Finally, I formulate a problem on truth (in)definability in Łukasiewicz logic which shows, in my opinion, that fuzzy logic is not just “applied logic” but rather belongs to systems commonly called “philosophical logic” like modal logics, etc.