web-based interactive data processing: application to stable isotope metrology

To address a fundamental need in stable isotope metrology, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has established a web-based interactive data-processing system accessible through a common gateway interface (CGI) program on the internet site http://www. nist.gov/widps-co2. This is the first application of a web-based tool that improves the measurement traceability afforded by a series of NIST standard materials. Specifically, this tool promotes the proper usage of isotope reference materials (RMs) and improves the quality of reported data from extensive measurement networks. Through the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), we have defined standard procedures for stable isotope measurement and data-processing, and have determined and applied consistent reference values for selected NIST and IAEA isotope RMs. Measurement data of samples and RMs are entered into specified fields on the web-based form. These data are submitted through the CGI program on a NIST Web server, where appropriate calculations are performed and results returned to the client. Several international laboratories have independently verified the accuracy of the procedures and algorithm for measurements of naturally occurring carbon-13 and oxygen-18 abundances and slightly enriched compositions up to approximately 150% relative to natural abundances. To conserve the use of the NIST RMs, users may determine value assignments for a secondary standard to be used in routine analysis. Users may also wish to validate proprietary algorithms embedded in their laboratory instrumentation, or specify the values of fundamental variables that are usually fixed in reduction algorithms to see the effect on the calculations. The results returned from the web-based tool are limited in quality only by the measurements themselves, and further value may be realized through the normalization function. When combined with stringent measurement protocols, two- to threefold improvements have been realized in the reproducibility of carbon-13 and oxygen-18 determinations across laboratories.     

Recent developments in food-matrix Reference Materials at NIST

Since 1996, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has developed several food-matrix Standard Reference Materials (SRMs) characterized for nutrient concentrations. These include SRM 1544 Fatty Acids and Cholesterol in a Frozen Diet Composite, SRM 1546 Meat Homogenate, SRM 1548a Typical Diet, SRM 1566b Oyster Tissue, SRM 1846 Infant Formula, and SRM 2383 Baby Food Composite. Three additional materials--SRM 1946 Lake Superior Fish Tissue, SRM 2384 Baking Chocolate, and SRM 2385 Spinach--are in preparation. NIST also recently assigned values for proximate (fat, protein, etc.), individual fatty acid, and total dietary fiber concentrations in a number of existing SRMs and reference materials (RMs) that previously had values assigned for their elemental composition. NIST has used several modes for assignment of analyte concentrations in the food-matrix RMs, including the use of data provided by collaborating laboratories, alone and in combination with NIST data. The use of data provided by collaborating food industry and contract laboratories for the analysis of food-matrix RMs has enabled NIST to provide assigned values for many analytes that NIST does not have the resources or analytical expertise to measure.     

Value assignment of nutrient concentrations in five standard reference materials and six reference materials

A number of food-matrix reference materials (RMs) are available from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and from Agriculture Canada through NIST. Most of these materials were originally value-assigned for their elemental composition (major, minor, and trace elements), but no additional nutritional information was provided. Two of the materials were certified for selected organic constituents. Ten of these materials (Standard Reference Material [SRM] 1,563 Cholesterol and Fat-Soluble Vitamins in Coconut Oil [Natural and Fortified], SRM 1,566b Oyster Tissue, SRM 1,570a Spinach Leaves, SRM 1,974a Organics in Mussel Tissue (Mytilus edulis), RM 8,415 Whole Egg Powder, RM 8,418 Wheat Gluten, RM 8,432 Corn Starch, RM 8,433 Corn Bran, RM 8,435 Whole Milk Powder, and RM 8,436 Durum Wheat Flour) were recently distributed by NIST to 4 laboratories with expertise in food analysis for the measurement of proximates (solids, fat, protein, etc.), calories, and total dietary fiber, as appropriate. SRM 1846 Infant Formula was distributed as a quality control sample for the proximates and for analysis for individual fatty acids. Two of the materials (Whole Egg Powder and Whole Milk Powder) were distributed in an earlier interlaboratory comparison exercise in which they were analyzed for several vitamins. Value assignment of analyte concentrations in these 11 SRMs and RMs, based on analyses by the collaborating laboratories, is described in this paper. These materials are intended primarily for validation of analytical methods for the measurement of nutrients in foods of similar composition (based on AOAC INTERNATIONAL's fat-protein-carbohydrate triangle). They may also be used as "primary control materials" in the value assignment of in-house control materials of similar composition. The addition of proximate information for 10 existing reference materials means that RMs are now available from NIST with assigned values for proximates in 6 of the 9 sectors of the AOAC triangle. Five of these materials have values assigned for total dietary fiber-the first such information provided for materials available from NIST.     

Summary of an interlaboratory characterization (certification) campaign to establish the elemental composition of a new series of agricultural/food reference materials

Summary Ten new Agricultural/Food Reference Materials (RMs) were characterized with respect to their elemental compositions via an interlaboratory characterization (certification) campaign. Chemical analyses were conducted in 73 cooperating laboratories applying 13 major classes of independently different analytical methods. A total of 213 best estimate values, and 65 informational values were obtained for Al, As, B, Ba, Br, Ca, Cd, Cl, Co, Cr, Cs, Cu, F, Fe, Hg, I, K, Mg, Mn, Mo, N, Na, Ni, P, Pb, Rb, S, Sb, Se, Sr, Ti, V, W and Zn in the following RMs: Bovine Muscle Powder (NIST RM 8414), Whole Egg Powder (NIST RM 8415), Microcrystalline Cellulose (NIST RM 8416), Wheat Gluten (NIST RM 8418), Corn Starch (NIST RM 8432), Corn Bran (NIST RM 8433), Whole Milk Powder (NIST RM 8435), Durum Wheat Flour (NIST RM 8436), Hard Red Spring Wheat Flour (NIST RM 8437) and Soft Winter Wheat Flour (NIST RM 8438).     

CO2 isotope analyses using large air samples collected on intercontinental flights by the CARIBIC Boeing 767

Analytical details for ¹³C and ¹⁸O isotope analyses of atmospheric CO₂ in large air samples are given. The large air samples of nominally 300 L were collected during the passenger aircraft‐based atmospheric chemistry research project CARIBIC and analyzed for a large number of trace gases and isotopic composition. In the laboratory, an ultra‐pure and high efficiency extraction system and high‐quality isotope ratio mass spectrometry were used. Because direct comparison with other laboratories was practically impossible, the extraction and measurement procedures were tested in considerable detail. Extracted CO₂ was measured twice vs. two different working reference CO₂ gases of different isotopic composition. The two data sets agree well and their distributions can be used to evaluate analytical errors due to isotope measurement, ion corrections, internal calibration consistency, etc. The calibration itself is based on NBS‐19 and also verified using isotope analyses on pure CO₂ gases (NIST Reference Materials (RMs) and NARCIS CO₂ gases). The major problem encountered could be attributed to CO₂‐water exchange in the air sampling cylinders. This exchange decreased over the years. To exclude artefacts due to such isotopic exchange, the data were filtered to reject negative δ¹⁸O(CO₂) values. Examples of the results are given. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Ensuring the reliability of stable isotope ratio data—beyond the principle of identical treatment

The need for inter-laboratory comparability is crucial to facilitate the globalisation of scientific networks and the development of international databases to support scientific and criminal investigations. This article considers what lessons can be learned from a series of inter-laboratory comparison exercises organised by the Forensic Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometry (FIRMS) network in terms of reference materials (RMs), the management of data quality, and technical limitations. The results showed that within-laboratory precision (repeatability) was generally good but between-laboratory accuracy (reproducibility) called for improvements. This review considers how stable isotope laboratories can establish a system of quality control (QC) and quality assurance (QA), emphasising issues of repeatability and reproducibility. For results to be comparable between laboratories, measurements must be traceable to the international δ-scales and, because isotope ratio measurements are reported relative to standards, a key aspect is the correct selection, calibration, and use of international and in-house RMs. The authors identify four principles which promote good laboratory practice. The principle of identical treatment by which samples and RMs are processed in an identical manner and which incorporates three further principles; the principle of identical correction (by which necessary corrections are identified and evenly applied), the principle of identical scaling (by which data are shifted and stretched to the international δ-scales), and the principle of error detection by which QC and QA results are monitored and acted upon. To achieve both good repeatability and good reproducibility it is essential to obtain RMs with internationally agreed δ-values. These RMs will act as the basis for QC and can be used to calibrate further in-house QC RMs tailored to the activities of specific laboratories. In-house QA standards must also be developed to ensure that QC-based calibrations and corrections lead to accurate results for samples. The δ-values assigned to RMs must be recorded and reported with all data. Reference materials must be used to determine what corrections are necessary for measured data. Each analytical sequence of samples must include both QC and QA materials which are subject to identical treatment during measurement and data processing. Results for these materials must be plotted, monitored, and acted upon. Periodically international RMs should be analysed as an in-house proficiency test to demonstrate results are accurate.     

Certification strategies for health-related SRMS at NIST

Inaccuracy in health-related measurements raises overall health care costs, results in misdiagnoses, leads to inaccurate conclusions in clinical studies, and results in inaccurate nutrition labeling. NIST has an extensive program aimed at providing the health measurements community with standard reference materials (SRMs) to assist them in making accurate measurements. A variety of approaches are used to certify health-related SRMs. For pure crystalline SRMs used as primary standards, direct assays of purity are often not possible. Thus numerous techniques including differential scanning calorimetry, mass spectrometry, chromatography, and others may be used to assess purity. For matrix SRMs used to assess the accuracy of measurement systems, the approaches for certification depend upon the needs of the users and NIST capabilities. When accuracy needs are the highest and the methods exist, NIST uses definitive methods, primarily involving isotope dilution mass spectrometry. These methods have been applied to the certification of serum-based SRMs for a number of the common clinical analytes. For many analytes, definitive methods have not been developed, so NIST uses other strategies for certification. In some cases, such as for drugs of abuse, two independent methods are used for the measurements. For nutrients such as vitamins, in-house methods are used along with results from outside laboratories having extensive experience with a particular analysis. The paper includes tables with examples of many of the health-related SRMs that are available. Received: 15 May 1997 / Revised: 23 July 1997 / Accepted: 25 July 1997     

Correcting measurement errors using reference materials in method validation

Quality assurance and method validation are needed to reduce false decisions due to measurement errors. In this context accuracy and standard uncertainty for the analytical method need to be considered to ensure that the performance characteristics of the method are understood. Therefore, analytical methods ought to be validated before implementation and controlled on a regular basis during usage. For this purpose reference materials (RMs) are useful to determine the performance characteristics of methods under development. These performance parameters may be documented in the light of a method evaluation study and the documentation related to international standards and guidelines. In a method evaluation study of Pb in blood using reference samples from the Laboratoire Toxicologie du Quèbec, Canada, a difference between the systematic errors was observed using a Perkin-Elmer Model 5100 atomic absorption spectrometer and a Perkin-Elmer Model 4100 atomic absorption spectrometer, both with Zeeman background correction. For measurement of blood samples, the performance parameters obtained in the method evaluation studies, i.e. slopes and intercepts of the method evaluation function (MEF), were intended to be used for correcting the systematic errors. However, the number of MEF samples was insufficient to produce an acceptable SD for the MEF slopes to be used for correction. In a method evaluation study on valproate in plasma using the SYVA's EMIT assay on COBAS MIRA S a significant systematic error above the concentration 300 mmol dm^–3 was demonstrated (slope 0.9541) and consequently the slope was used for correction of results. For analytes, where certified RMs (CRMs) exist, a systematic error of measurements can be reduced by correcting errors by assessment of the trueness as recommended in international guidelines issued by ISO or the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). When possible, the analysis of several RMs, covering the concentration range of interest, is the most useful way to investigate measurement bias. Unfortunately, until recently only few RMs existed and only few had been produced and certified by specialized organizations such as NIST or the Standards, Measurements and Testing (SMT, previously BCR) programme. Due to the lack of such RMs, network organizations are nowadays established with the aim of supporting the correct use and production of high-quality CRMs.     

The establishment of quality systems in veterinary diagnostic testing laboratories in developing countries: experiences with the FAO/IAEA External Quality Assurance Programme

Quality systems, established to internationally accepted standards, are one mechanism that can assist in evaluations of the sustainability of technology transfer, the proficiency of the user, and the reliability and comparability of data generated, resulting in potential enhancement of laboratory credibility. The means of interpreting existing standards and implementing quality systems in developing country veterinary diagnostic laboratories has become a significant adjunct to the technology transfer element within the Food and Agriculture/ International Atomic Energy Agency, FAO/IAEA programme. The FAO/IAEA External Quality Assurance Programme (EQAP) is given as an example for an initial step towards enhancing the “quality” culture in developing country veterinary laboratories. In 1995 the EQAP began as an effort to assure that test results emanating from laboratories using FAO/IAEA ELISA kits for animal disease diagnosis are valid. For this purpose 15 international external quality-assurance rounds have been performed to date for a variety of animal diseases e.g. Rinderpest, brucellosis, trypanosomosis, and foot-and-mouth disease (FMD). Results indicate that the EQAP is a valuable tool in the assessment of both the results provided by, and use of the ELISA kits provided through, the joint FAO/IAEA programme. Furthermore EQAP can assist laboratory diagnosticians to enhance quality control/quality assurance (QC/QA) procedures for conducting FAO/IAEA ELISAs and to advise on the implementation of similar QC/QA procedures in other laboratory activities. Based on the experiences made during the implementation of the EQAP a proposal for establishing a quality system standard was ratified through the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) general conference in May 2000. The OIE Standard On Management And Technical Requirements For Laboratories Conducting Tests For Infectious Animal Diseases is based on ISO 17025 and provides a clear formula for establishing quality systems in veterinary diagnostic laboratories world-wide.     

Determination of aluminium contents in selected food samples by instrumental neutron activation analysis

Food and food products are the main sources of Aluminium entering the human body. In order to know aluminium contents in food and food products, selected 26 samples from local market were analyzed by instrumental neutron activation analysis (INAA) using reactor neutrons and high resolution gamma-ray spectrometry. INAA using 1,779 keV γ-ray of ²⁸Al (2.24 min) was used for aluminium concentrations in the range of 33–529 mg kg^?1. Two NIST standard reference materials (SRMs) and two IAEA reference materials (RMs) were analyzed by INAA for quantification of aluminium as a part of method validation.     

k0-NAA quality assessment by analysis of different certified reference materials using the KAYZERO/SOLCOI software

A suite of natural matrix reference materials (RMs) were used to assess the quality of analytical results obtained by k ₀-instrumental neutron activation analysis (k ₀-INAA) at the Joef Stefan Institute (IJS). Five certified reference materials (CRMs) from the Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements (IRMM), two standard reference materials (SRMs) from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), three RMs from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and one RM from IJS were analyzed. Altogether, results for twenty-four elements in inorganic matrices and twenty-nine elements in organic matrices, obtained by k ₀-INAA, were compared to certified values. Results obtained show good agreement with certified or assigned values except for Fe, La, Nd, Sm and U in inorganic matrices, and Ag, Al and Cr in organic matrices.     

Particle size determination of some IAEA and NIST environmental and biological reference materials

Particle size distributions in fifteen International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and sixteen National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) reference materials (RMs) were measured with the basic aim to investigate the potential of these materials to be used as reference or quality control materials in analyses where a small sample mass is required (< 100 mg). Most of the investigated materials are commercially available environmental or biological natural matrix RMs with certified values for trace elements, radionuclides, or organometallic compounds. The laser diffraction technique was used in all measurements. From the point of particle size distribution, materials IAEA-390 (Algae, a set of three materials), IAEA-396m (Urban Dust, 3x air jet milled), NIST-SRM 1515 (Apple Leaves), NIST-SRM 1547 (Peach Leaves), NIST-SRM 1566a (Oyster Tissue), NIST-SRM 1570a (Spinach), NIST-SRM 1573a (Tomato Leaves), and NIST-SRM 1648 (Urban Particulate) can be considered appropriate for small sample mass analysis. However, additional analytical tests are needed to confirm the appropriate homogeneous distribution of chemical composition, the level of heterogeneity for individual elements, at this sample mass level.     

Systematic comparison of δ13C measurements of testosterone and derivative steroids in a freeze-dried urine candidate reference material for sports drug testing by gas chromatography/combustion/isotope ratio mass spectrometry and uncertainty evaluation using four different metrological approaches

An alternative calibration procedure for use when performing carbon isotope ratio measurements by gas chromatography/combustion/isotope ratio mass spectrometry (GC/C/IRMS) has been developed. This calibration procedure does not rely on the corrections in-built in the instrument software, as the carbon isotope ratios of a sample are calculated from the measured raw peak areas. The method was developed for the certification of a urine reference material for sports drug testing, as the estimation of measurement uncertainty is greatly simplified. To ensure that the method is free from bias arising from the choice of calibration material and instrument, the carbon isotope ratios of steroids in urine extracts were measured using two different instruments in different laboratories, and three different reference materials (CU/USADA steroid standards from Brenna Laboratory, Cornell University; NIST RM8539 mineral oil; methane calibrated against NIST RM8560 natural gas). The measurements were performed at LGC and the Australian National Measurement Institute (NMI). It was found that there was no significant difference in measurement results when different instruments and reference materials were used to measure the carbon isotope ratio of the major testosterone metabolites androsterone and etiocholanolone, or the endogenous reference compounds pregnanediol, 11- ketoetiocholanolone and 11β-hydroxyandrosterone. Expanded measurement uncertainties at the 95% coverage probability ranged from 0.21‰ to 1.4‰, depending on analyte, instrument and reference material. The measurement results of this comparison were used to estimate a measurement uncertainty of δ(13)C for the certification of the urine reference material being performed on a single instrument using a single reference material at NMI.     

Global perspectives for secondary reference materials for analysis of food and related biological samples

Primary, secondary and tertiary reference materials (RM) play an important role in quality controls of analytical measurements. Logistics of preparation and proper use of primary and secondary RMs are presented. Tertiary (i.e. in-house) control materials are useful as substitutes in the absence of recognized primary or secondary RMs. The lack of interdisciplinary interaction during development of RMs (e.g. in specific areas such as foods), has an important impact on limiting the usefulness of certain types of RMs. The abundance of RMs in some countries and regions appears to have little effect on the existing paucity in RMs in other regions, and the underlying causes are outlined. The ability of a laboratory to produce good quality in-house RMs traceable to recognized primary or secondary RMs is a direct measure of its quest for reliable analytical data. Therefore many laboratories should be encouraged to engage in secondary and tertiary RM activities designed to answer specific measurement problems. In this context, assistance (e.g. practical training opportunities) in identifying simple methods of analyses for their efficacy in determining specific analytes is a source of help that can be extended to countries experiencing limitations in laboratory instrumentation.     

Evaluation of laboratory performance using proficiency test exercise results

The IAEA conducted the IAEA-CU-2006-06 Proficiency Test (PT) on “The determination of major, minor and trace elements in ancient Chinese ceramic” in 2006. The results of this PT showed that of the 21 analytes reported by our laboratory 9 failed the precision criteria. Therefore the results reported by our laboratory along with the results of other laboratories which carried out analysis using neutron activation analysis (NAA) were studied. It was found that the major factor contributing towards data falling in the “Warning” category, failing the precision criteria was the high uncertainties cited in the certificates of the reference materials (RMs) used for quantification of data. In this regard, it is recommended that synthetic standards should be prepared and used on a routine basis especially for the measurement of the elements K, Eu, Lu, Ta, Tb and Yb.     

Radionuclidic standardization by primary methods: An overview

Primary methods of radionuclidic standardization serve as the underlying basis of the physical measurement standards of activity that are needed in virtually every sub-discipline of radioanalytical and nuclear chemistry. Primary methods refer to the direct measurement of the number of nuclear transformations that occur per unit time, without recourse to other calibrations or standards. Such measurements, leading to the development and dissemination of radioactivity standards, are primarily performed under the purview of national metrology laboratories, like the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) in the USA. This paper briefly reviews some of the various primary methods that have been developed by many such laboratories over many years. Their features and their role in ensuring the quality of radioactivity measurements are highlighted by several primary standardizations that have been recently performed at NIST.     

Substoichiometric isotope dilution analysis of arsenic in biological and environmental standard reference materials by solvent extraction using toluene-3,4-dithiol in benzene

A radiochemical solvent extraction procedure has been developed for the determination of As(III) using⁷⁶As tracer. It is based on the complexation of As(III) with toluene-3,4-dithiol (TDT) at pH 2 and subsequent extraction in benzene. The effect of various parameters such as pH, time of equilibration, nature of solvent, quantitative character and interferences have been studied. The method has been further developed into substoichiometric isotope dilution analysis for the determination of As at < 1 g level and employed for the analysis of several environmental and biological standard Reference Materials from NIST (USA), IAEA (Vienna) and NIES (Japan).     

Reference materials in the Russian system of accreditation of analytical laboratories

 This article is devoted to the role of reference materials (RMs) in chemical analysis and their main applications in analytical laboratories. The principal requirements of the RMs used in accredited laboratories in the Russian Analytical Laboratories Accreditation System (SAAL) are presented. These include the basic regulatory and metrological requirements of RMs. Finally, a review of the provision of RMs used for the analytical control of various test objects is presented. Received: 9 August 1998 / Accepted: 9 November 1998     

Definitive method certification of clinical analytes in lyophilized human serum: NIST Standard Reference Material (SRM) 909b

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has developed several Standard Reference Materials (SRMs) based on human serum. NIST SRM 909b, Human Serum, is a lyophilized human serum material with concentrations for seven organic and six inorganic analytes at two levels certified solely by definitive methods (DMs). This material provides the vehicle by which high precision, high accuracy measurements made with DMs at NIST can be transferred through the measurement hierarchy to other laboratories. Isotope dilution gas chromatographic-mass spectrometric (GC-IDMS) methods were applied to measure cholesterol, creatinine, glucose, urea, uric acid, triglycerides, and total glycerides. Thermal ionization isotope dilution mass spectrometry (TI-IDMS) was used for determination of lithium, magnesium, potassium, calcium, and chloride. In addition, chloride was determined by coulometry, providing a comparison between two DMs. Sodium, which lacks a stable isotope that would permit isotope dilution mass spectrometric (IDMS) measurement, was determined by gravimetry. SRM 909b includes certified values for total glycerides and triglycerides, which were not certified in the previous lot of this material (SRM 909a). Improvement in uniformity of vial fill weight in the production of SRM 909b resulted in smaller certified uncertainties over previous freeze-dried serum SRMs. Uncertainties at the 99% level of confidence for relative expanded uncertainty (%) for certification of the organic analytes on a mmol/L/g basis ranged from 0.44% for urea (level II) to 5.04% for glucose (level II). (In-house studies have shown glucose to be a relatively unstable analyte in similar lyophilized serum materials, degrading at about 1% per year.) Relative expanded uncertainties (99% C.I.) for certification of inorganic analytes on a mmol/L/g basis ranged from 0.25% for chloride (level I) to 0.49% for magnesium (level II). Received: 30 July 1997 / Revised: 24 October 1997 / Accepted: 31 October 1997