Polymorphs of the antiviral drug ganciclovir

Ganciclovir (GCV; systematic name: 2‐amino‐9‐{[(1,3‐dihydroxypropan‐2‐yl)oxy]methyl}‐6,9‐dihydro‐1H‐purin‐6‐one), C₉H₁₃N₅O₄, an antiviral drug for treating cytomegalovirus infections, has two known polymorphs (Forms I and II), but only the structure of the metastable Form II has been reported [Kawamura & Hirayama (2009). X‐ray Struct. Anal. Online , 25 , 51–52]. We describe a successful preparation of GCV Form I and its crystal structure. GCV is an achiral molecule in the sense that its individual conformers, which are generally chiral objects, undergo fast interconversion in the liquid state and cannot be isolated. In the crystalline state, GCV exists as two inversion‐related conformers in Form I and as a single chiral conformer in Form II. This situation is similar to that observed for glycine, also an achiral molecule, whose α‐polymorph contains two inversion‐related conformers, while the γ‐polymorph contains a single conformer that is chiral. The hydrogen bonds are exclusively intermolecular in Form I, but both inter‐ and intramolecular in Form II, which accounts for the different molecular conformations in the two polymorphs.     

Conformational Polymorphism in Racemic 2,4-Di-<Emphasis Type="Italic">o</Emphasis>-Benzoyl-6-<Emphasis Type="Italic">o</Emphasis>-Tosyl <Emphasis Type="Italic">myo</Emphasis>-Inositol 1,3,5-Orthoacetate

The title compound, C₂₉H₂₆O₁₀S, yields two conformational polymorphs concomitantly from dichloromethane-methanol mixture; the major polymorph grows as plates (Form I, monoclinic, P2₁/n) and the minor polymorph grows as needles (Form II, triclinic, P-1). The two forms differ mainly in orientation of the tosyl group. In Form I, sulfonyl oxygen of the tosyl group makes intermolecular C −H…O interactions, whereas the same group in Form II is involved in an intramolecular short dipolar S=O…C=O (sulfonyl-carbonyl) contact. The molecular organization and the influence of various weak non-covalent interactions that stabilize these conformers in the crystal lattices are discussed.     

Polymorphism in 3‐acetyl‐4‐hydroxy‐2H‐chromen‐2‐one

A new polymorph (denoted polymorph II) of 3‐acetyl‐4‐hydroxy‐2H‐chromen‐2‐one, C₁₁H₈O₄, was obtained unexpectedly during an attempt to recrystallize the compound from salt–melted ice, and the structure is compared with that of the original polymorph (denoted polymorph I) [Lyssenko & Antipin (2001). Russ. Chem. Bull. 50 , 418–431]. Strong intramolecular O—H...O hydrogen bonds are observed equally in the two polymorphs [O...O = 2.4263 (13) Å in polymorph II and 2.442 (1) Å in polymorph I], with a slight delocalization of the hydroxy H atom towards the ketonic O atom in polymorph II [H...O = 1.32 (2) Å in polymorph II and 1.45 (3) Å in polymorph I]. In both crystal structures, the packing of the molecules is dominated and stabilized by weak intermolecular C—H...O hydrogen bonds. Additional π–π stacking interactions between the keto–enol hydrogen‐bonded rings stabilize polymorph I [the centres are separated by 3.28 (1) Å], while polymorph II is stabilized by interactions between α‐pyrone rings, which are parallel to one another and separated by 3.670 (5) Å.     

Polymorphism of a widely used building block for halogen‐bonded assemblies: 1,3,5‐trifluoro‐2,4,6‐triiodobenzene

After reporting the structure of a new polymorph of 1,3,5‐trifluoro‐2,4,6‐triiodobenzene (denoted BzF3I3 ), C₆F₃I₃, (I), which crystallized in the space group P 2₁/c , we perform a comparative analysis with the already reported P 2₁/n polymorph, (II) [Reddy et al. (2006). Chem. Eur. J. 12 , 2222–2234]. In polymorph (II), type‐II I…I halogen bonds and I…π interactions connect molecules in such a way that a three‐dimensional structure is formed; however, the way in which molecules are connected in polymorph (I), through type‐II I…I halogen bonds and π–π interactions, gives rise to an exfoldable lamellar structure, which looks less tightly bound than that of (II). In agreement with this structural observation, both the melting point and the melting enthalpy of (I) are lower than those of (II).     

Triclabendazole: An Intriguing Case of Co‐existence of Conformational and Tautomeric Polymorphism

The crystal polymorphism of the anthelmintic drug, triclabendazole ( TCB ), is described. Two anhydrates (Forms I and II), three solvates, and an amorphous form have been previously mentioned. This study reports the crystal structures of Forms I ( 1 ) and II ( 2 ). These structures illustrate the uncommon phenomenon of tautomeric polymorphism. TCB exists as two tautomers A and B. Form I (Z′=2) is composed of two molecules of tautomer A while Form II (Z′=1) contains a 1:1 mixture of A and B. The polymorphs are also characterized by using other solid‐state techniques (differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA), PXRD, FT‐IR, and NMR spectroscopy). Form I is the higher melting form (m.p.: 177 °C, ΔH_f=≈105±4 J g^?1) and is the more stable form at room temperature. Form II is the lower melting polymorph (m.p.: 166 °C, ΔH_f=≈86±3 J g^?1) and shows high kinetic stability on storage in comparison to the amorphous form but it transforms readily into Form I in a solution‐mediated process. Crystal structure analysis of co‐crystals 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 further confirms the existence of tautomeric polymorphism in TCB . In 3 and 11 , tautomer A is present whereas in 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 the TCB molecule exists wholly as tautomer B. The DFT calculations suggest that the optimized tautomers A and B have nearly the same energies. Single point energy calculations reveal that tautomer A (in Form I) exists in two low‐energy conformations, whereas in Form II both tautomers A and B exist in an unfavorable high‐energy conformation, stabilized by a five‐point dimer synthon. The structural and thermodynamic features of 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 are discussed in detail. Triclabendazole is an intriguing case in which tautomeric and conformational variations co‐exist in the polymorphs.     

Twinning in 5‐fluorosalicylic acid: description of a new polymorph

The crystal structure of 5‐fluorosalicylic acid is known from the literature [Choudhury & Guru Row (2004). Acta Cryst. E 60 , o1595–o1597] as crystallizing in the monoclinic crystal system with space‐group setting P2₁/n and with one molecule in the asymmetric unit (polymorph I). We describe here a new polymorph which is again monoclinic but with different unit‐cell parameters (polymorph II). Polymorph II has two molecules in the asymmetric unit. Its structure was modelled as a twin, with a pseudo‐orthorhombic C‐centred twin cell.     

Polymorphic form IV of olanzapine

2‐Methyl‐4‐(4‐methylpiperazin‐1‐yl)‐10H‐thieno[2,3‐b][1,5]benzodiazepine, C₁₇H₂₀N₄S, commonly known as olanzapine, is a psychotropic agent that belongs to the thienobenzodiazepine class of drugs. A new polymorph form IV was obtained upon attempted cocrystallization with nicotinamide in a 1:1 ratio from an ethyl acetate solution. Two butterfly‐like molecules form centrosymmetric dimers stabilized by weak C—H...π interactions between the 4‐methylpiperazin‐1‐yl fragment and the benzene/thiophene aromatic system. Form IV consists of a herringbone arrangement of dimers, whereas the previously reported form II has parallel dimers. Both crystal structures are sustained by an N—H...N hydrogen bond.     

Two polymorphs of safinamide,a selective and reversible inhibitor of monoamine oxidase B

Two polymorphs of safinamide {systematic name: (2S)‐2‐[4‐(3‐fluorobenzyloxy)benzylamino]propionamide}, C₁₇H₁₉FN₂O₂, a potent selective and reversible monoamine oxidase B (MAO‐B) inhibitor, are described. Both forms are orthorhombic and regarded as conformational polymorphs due to the differences in the orientation of the 3‐fluorobenzyloxy and propanamide groups. Both structures pack with layers in the ac plane. In polymorph (I), the layers have discrete wide and narrow regions which are complementary when located next to adjacent layers. In polymorph (II), the layer has long flanges protruding from each side, which interdigitate when packed with the adjacent layers. N—H...O hydrogen bonds are present in both structures, whereas N—H...F hydrogen bonding is seen in polymorph (I), while N—H...N hydrogen bonding is seen in polymorph (II).     

Triclinic and monoclinic polymorphs of meso‐(E,E)‐1,1′‐[1,2‐bis(4‐chlorophenyl)ethane‐1,2‐diyl]bis(phenyldiazene): the high‐yield synthesis of an unexpected product,concomitant polymorphism and configurational disorder

Pyrazolidine‐3,5‐diones and their derivatives exhibit a wide range of biological activities. Seeking to explore the effect of combining a hydrocarbyl ring substituent, as present in sulfinpyrazone (used to treat gout), with a chlorinated aryl ring, as present in muzolimine (a diuretic), we explored the reaction between 1‐phenylpyrazolidine‐3,5‐dione and 4‐chlorobenzaldehyde under mildly basic conditions in the expectation of producing the simple condensation product 4‐(4‐chlorobenzylidene)‐1‐phenylpyrazolidine‐3,5‐dione. However, the reaction product proved to be meso‐(E,E)‐1,1′‐[1,2‐bis(4‐chlorophenyl)ethane‐1,2‐diyl]bis(phenyldiazene), C₂₆H₂₀Cl₂N₄, and a tentative mechanism is proposed. Crystallization from ethanol produces two concomitant polymorphs, i.e. a triclinic form, (I), in the space group P, and a monoclinic form, (II), in the space group C2/c. In both polymorphs, the molecules lie across centres of inversion, but in (II), the molecules are subject to whole‐molecule disorder equivalent to configurational disorder with occupancies of 0.6021 (19) and 0.3979 (19). There are no hydrogen bonds in the crystal structure of polymorph (I), but the molecules of polymorph (II) are linked by C—H...π(arene) hydrogen bonds into complex chains, which are further linked into sheets by C—H...N interactions.     

The [4 + 4] thermocyclization of 9‐anthraldehyde: synthesis,crystal structure,experimental and theoretical UV spectra,natural bonding orbital analysis and prediction of third‐order nonlinear optical properties

The dimer of 9‐anthraldehyde, namely heptacyclo[8.6.6.6^2,9.0^3,8.0^11,16.0^17,22.0^23,28]octacosa‐3,5,7,11,13,15,17(22),18,20,23(28),24,26‐dodecaene‐1,9‐carbaldehyde, C₃₀H₂₀O₂, has been synthesized by refluxing an ethanol solution in the presence of M(ClO₄)₂ and 1,3‐diaminopropan‐2‐ol (M = Co²⁺ or Cu²⁺). Its structure has been determined by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction, showing it to be a new polymorph, referred to as polymorph II, in the monoclinic space group P2₁/n. It is compared with the previously reported triclinic modification [Ehrenberg (1968). Acta Cryst. B 24 , 1123–1125], which is referred to as polymorph I. The asymmetric unit of polymorph II contains two half molecules located on crystallographic centres, while the asymmetric unit of polymorph I includes one half molecule, also located on a crystallographic centre. Time‐dependent density functional theory (TD‐DFT) at the RB3LYP level using the 6‐31G(d,p) basis set was applied. The predicted electronic absorption spectrum is in good agreement with the experimental one. The analysis of the calculated electronic absorption spectrum of polymorph II was carried out in order to assign the observed electronic transitions and to determine their character. A natural bonding orbital (NBO) analysis was executed at the same level to evaluate charge‐transfer, intramolecular hydrogen‐bonding interactions and hyperconjugative interactions. The third‐order nonlinear optical (NLO) properties of the compound were appraised by the ZINDO/sum‐over‐states method in both static and dynamic states. The orientationally averaged (isotropic) value of γ for the compound is greater than the corresponding value of 4‐nitroaniline (pNA).     

Crystal polymorphs of 6‐[(phenylcarbamoyl)oxy]hexa‐2,4‐diyn‐1‐yl isonicotinate

The title compound, C₁₉H₁₄N₂O₄, was found to have two crystal polymorphs, in which the molecular structures of the diacetylenic compound are broadly similar. The main structural difference between the polymorphs concerns the intermolecular hydrogen‐bonding motifs adopted, namely a one‐dimensional zigzag polymer linked by N—H…N(py) (py is pyridine) interactions in polymorph I and a centrosymmetric dimeric motif formed by N—H…O=C interactions in polymorph II. The diacetylene cores of the molecules stack along the a and b axes in polymorphs I and II, respectively. It was found that only the molecular arrangement in polymorph II satisfies Baughman's criterion to afford polydiacetylenes (PDAs) by thermal annealing or irradiation with light. This predicted polymerization activity was confirmed by experiment.     

Two polymorphs of 5‐cyclohexyl‐5‐ethylbarbituric acid and their packing relationships with other barbiturates

Polymorph (Ia) (m.p. 474 K) of the title compound, C₁₂H₁₈N₂O₃, displays an N—H...O=C hydrogen‐bonded layer structure which contains R₆⁶(28) rings connecting six molecules, as well as R₂²(8) rings linking two molecules. The 3‐connected hydrogen‐bonded net resulting from these interactions has the hcb topology. Form (Ib) (m.p. 471 K) displays N—H...O=C hydrogen‐bonded looped chains in which neighbouring molecules are linked to one another by two different R₂²(8) rings. Polymorph (Ia) is isostructural with the previously reported form II of 5‐(2‐bromoallyl)‐5‐isopropylbarbituric acid (noctal) and polymorph (Ib) is isostructural with the known crystal structures of four other barbiturates.     

A novel crystal form of metacetamol: the first example of a hydrated form

We report the crystal structure and crystallization conditions of a first hydrated form of metacetamol (a hemihydrate), C₈H₉NO₂·0.5H₂O. It crystallizes from metacetamol‐saturated 1:1 (v/v) water–ethanol solutions in a monoclinic structure (space group P2₁/n) and contains eight metacetamol and four water molecules per unit cell. The conformations of the molecules are the same as in polymorph II of metacetamol, which ensures the formation of hydrogen‐bonded dimers and R₂²(16) ring motifs in its crystal structure similar to those in polymorph II. Unlike in form II, however, these dimers in the hemihydrate are connected through water molecules into infinite hydrogen‐bonded molecular chains. Different chains are linked to each other by metacetamol–water and metacetamol–metacetamol hydrogen bonds, the latter type being also present in polymorph I. The overall noncovalent network of the hemihydrate is well developed and several types of hydrogen bonds are responsible for its formation.     

A comparative study of two polymorphs of bis(1‐hydroxy‐2‐methylpropan‐2‐aminium) carbonate

Alkanolamines have been known for their high CO₂ absorption for over 60 years and are used widely in the natural gas industry for reversible CO₂ capture. In an attempt to crystallize a salt of (RS)‐2‐(3‐benzoylphenyl)propionic acid with 2‐amino‐2‐methylpropan‐1‐ol, we obtained instead a polymorph (denoted polymorph II) of bis(1‐hydroxy‐2‐methylpropan‐2‐aminium) carbonate, 2C₄H₁₂NO⁺·CO₃²⁻, (I), suggesting that the amine group of the former compound captured CO₂ from the atmosphere forming the aminium carbonate salt. This new polymorph was characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis at low temperature (100 K). The salt crystallizes in the monoclinic system (space group C2/c, Z = 4), while a previously reported form of the same salt (denoted polymorph I) crystallizes in the triclinic system (space group P, Z = 2) [Barzagli et al. (2012). ChemSusChem, 5 , 1724–1731]. The asymmetric unit of polymorph II contains one 1‐hydroxy‐2‐methylpropan‐2‐aminium cation and half a carbonate anion, located on a twofold axis, while the asymmetric unit of polymorph I contains two cations and one anion. These polymorphs exhibit similar structural features in their three‐dimensional packing. Indeed, similar layers of an alternating cation–anion–cation neutral structure are observed in their molecular arrangements. Within each layer, carbonate anions and 1‐hydroxy‐2‐methylpropan‐2‐aminium cations form planes bound to each other through N—H…O and O—H…O hydrogen bonds. In both polymorphs, the layers are linked to each other via van der Waals interactions and C—H…O contacts. In polymorph II, a highly directional C—H…O contact (C—H…O = 156°) shows as a hydrogen‐bonding interaction. Periodic theoretical density functional theory (DFT) calculations indicate that both polymorphs present very similar stabilities.     

Nickel(II) and Copper(II) Complexes of β‐Unsubstituted 5,15‐Diazaporphyrins and Pyridazine‐Fused Diazacorrinoids: Metal–Template Syntheses and Peripheral Functionalizations

The present paper reports the first comprehensive study on the synthesis, structures, optical and electrochemical properties, and peripheral functionalizations of nickel(II) and copper(II) complexes of β‐unsubstituted 5,15‐diazaporphyrins (M‐DAP; M=Ni, Cu) and pyridazine‐fused diazacorrinoids (Ni‐DACX; X=N, O). These two classes of compounds were constructed starting from mesityldipyrromethane by a metal–template method. Ni‐DAP and Cu‐DAP were prepared in high yields by the reaction of the respective metal–bis(dibromodipyrrin) complexes with NaN₃–CuX (X=I, Br), whereas Ni‐DACN and Ni‐DACO were formed as predominant products by the reaction with NaN₃. In both cases, the metal centers change their geometry from tetrahedral to square planar during the aza‐annulation; X‐ray crystallographic analyses of M‐DAPs showed highly planar diazaporphyrin π planes. The Q band of Ni‐DAP was redshifted and intensified compared with that of a nickel–porphyrin reference, due to the involvement of electronegative nitrogen atoms at the meso positions. It was found that the peripheral bromination of Ni‐DAP and Ni‐DACO occurred regioselectively to afford Ni‐DAP‐Br₄ and Ni‐DACO‐Br, respectively. These brominated derivatives underwent Stille reactions with tributyl(phenyl)stannane to give the corresponding phenylated derivatives, Ni‐DAP‐Ph₄ and Ni‐DACO‐Ph. On the basis of the absorption spectra and X‐ray analysis, it has been concluded that the attached phenyl groups efficiently conjugate with the diazaporphyrin π system. The present results unambiguously corroborate that the β‐unsubstituted DAPs and DACXs are promising platforms for the development of a new class of π‐conjugated azaporphyrin‐based materials.     

The crystal packing of 4,7‐dichloro‐ and 4,7‐dibromobenzo[c]furazan 1‐oxide

The molecular structures of 4,7‐di­chloro­benzo­[c]­fur­azan 1‐­oxide, C₆H₂Cl₂N₂O₂, (I), and 4,7‐di­bromo­benzo­[c]­fur­azan 1‐oxide, C₆H₂Br₂N₂O₂, (II), are normal. Compound (I) occurs in two polymorphic forms. One polymorph contains one mol­ecule in the asymmetric unit, organized into two‐dimensional sheets involving intermolecular N?Cl and O?Cl inter­actions. The second polymorph has three mol­ecules in the asymmetric unit, organized into two crystallographically different two‐dimensional sheets with similar interactions. Compound (II) is isomorphous with the second polymorph of (I). The three two‐dimensional sheets in the two polymorphs comprise a set of three two‐dimensional polymorphic arrangements.     

Selective synthesis of (3‐ferrocenylprop‐2‐en‐1‐yl)triphenylphosphonium iodide: crystal structure determination of two polymorphs

This work is part of a project studying the reactivity of a new ferrocenyl allylammonium salt, [3‐(trimethylazaniumyl)prop‐1‐en‐1‐yl]ferrocene iodide, (1⁺)·I⁻, with different nucleophiles. With nitrogen‐based nucleophiles, different ferrocenyl allylamine isomers have been synthesized successfully in good yield. Optimization of the basicity of the reaction medium has allowed selection of the best operating conditions to obtain the targeted isomer. In a similar way and in order to introduce phosphorus‐containing functional groups, the reaction of ammonium salt (1⁺)·I⁻ with a phosphorus nucleophile, namely triphenylphosphane, was attempted. It was then possible to isolate single crystals of (3‐ferrocenylprop‐2‐en‐1‐yl)triphenylphosphonium iodide, [Fe(C₅H₅)(C₂₆H₂₃P)]I, which is shown to crystallize in two concomitant polymorphic forms, viz. a triclinic form, (I), in the space group P , and a monoclinic form, (II), in the space group P 2₁/c . In the inter‐ion packing of polymorph (I), the cations form bilayer ribbons via C—H…π and π–π stacking interactions. In polymorph (II), where π–π interactions do not occur, adjacent molecules are joined by C—H…π interactions into a one‐dimensional helical arrangement along the b axis.     

DDT Polymorphism and the Lethality of Crystal Forms

DDT (1,1,1‐trichloro‐2,2‐bis(4‐chlorophenyl)ethane), a contact insecticide with a rich and controversial history since its activity was discovered in 1939, has long been thought to be monomorphic. Herein we report the discovery and characterization of a second polymorph, designated Form II, which can be isolated as single crystals, but converts very slowly at room temperature to the form reported previously, now designated as Form I. Computations based on an evolutionary algorithm for crystal structure prediction revealed that Forms I and II are among the four lowest energy crystal structures of fifty calculated. A preliminary study of the contact insecticidal activity toward fruit flies (Drosophila melanogaster) indicates that Form II is more active, suggesting opportunities for more effective solid‐state formulations that would allow reduced amounts of DDT, thereby minimizing environmental impact.     

A new polymorph of poly[bis(μ2‐perchlorato‐κ2O:O′)(2,2′:6′,2′′‐terpyridine‐κ3N,N′,N′′)lead(II)] with a greatly extended chain repeat distance

In the title compound, [Pb(ClO₄)₂(C₁₅H₁₁N₃)]_n, two molecules occupy general positions while the third lies on a crystallographic twofold axis, giving a total of two and a half molecules per asymmetric unit. Each metal centre is coordinated equatorially by three 2,2′:6′,2′′‐terpyridine (terpy) N‐donor atoms and axially by two perchlorate O‐donor atoms. The distorted pentagonal bipyramidal geometry is completed by two equatorial O‐donor atoms from two perchlorate anions which bridge to two different adjacent metal centres. The coordination about each metal centre is very similar to that seen at the unique Pb^II centre in the previously published polymorph [Engelhardt, Harrowfield, Miyamae, Patrick, Skelton, Soudi & White (1996). Aust. J. Chem. 49 , 1135–1146], but the new polymorph differs from it by the insertion on each side of an existing [bis(perchlorato)(terpy)lead(II)] molecule of two additional such units. Pairs of asymmetrically bridging perchlorate anions link irregularly spaced Pb^II centres into undulating chains parallel to [201] which exhibit a repeat distance of 26.280 (4) Å. The significance of this new polymorph lies in the fact that, while it is chemically identical to the known polymorph, it is structurally distinct from it.     

A new polymorph of triphenylmethylamine: the effect of hydrogen bonding

Crystallization of the hexane reaction mixture after treatment of LiGe(OCH₂CH₂NMe₂)₃ with Ph₃CN₃ gives rise to a new triclinic (space group P) polymorph of triphenylmethylamine, C₁₉H₁₇N, (I), containing dimers formed by N—H...N hydrogen bonds, whereas the structure of the known orthorhombic (space group P2₁2₁2₁) polymorph of this compound, (II), consists of isolated molecules. While the dimers in (I) lie across crystallographic inversion centres, the molecules are not truly related by them. The centrosymmetric structure is due to the statistical disordering of the amino H atoms participating in the N—H...N hydrogen‐bonding interactions, and thus the inversion centre is superpositional. The conformations and geometric parameters of the molecules in (I) and (II) are very similar. It was found that the polarity of the solvent does not affect the capability of triphenylmethylamine to crystallize in the different polymorphic modifications. The orthorhombic polymorph, (II), is more thermodynamically stable under normal conditions than the triclinic polymorph, (I). The experimental data indicate the absence of a phase transition in the temperature interval 120–293 K. The densities of (I) (1.235 Mg m⁻³) and (II) (1.231 Mg m⁻³) at 120 K are practically equal. It would seem that either the kinetic factors or the effects of the other products of the reaction facilitating the hydrogen‐bonded dimerization of triphenylmethylamine molecules are the determining factor for the isolation of the triclinic polymorph (I) of triphenylmethylamine.