Optimal allocation of policy limits and deductibles in a model with mixture risks and discount factors

By maximizing the expected utility, we study the optimal allocation of policy limits and deductibles from the viewpoint of a policyholder, where the dependence structure of losses is unknown. In Cheung (2007) [K.C. Cheung, Optimal allocation of policy limits and deductibles, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 41 (2007) 382-391], the author had considered similar problems. He supposed that a policyholder was exposed to n random losses, and the losses were general risks there, i.e., the loss on each policy was just a random variable. In this paper, the model is extended in two directions. On one hand, we assume that n policies of the n losses are effected by random environments. For each policy, the loss under a fixed environment is characterized by a random variable, so the loss on each policy is a mixture of some fundamental random variables. On the other hand, loss frequencies, which are stochastic, are also considered. Therefore, the whole model is equipped with mixture risks and discount factors. Finally, we get the orderings of the optimal allocations of policy limits and deductibles. Our conclusions also extend the main results in Hua and Cheung (2008) [L. Hua, K.C. Cheung, Stochastic orders of scalar products with applications, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 42 (2008) 865-872].     

Worst allocations of policy limits and deductibles

In the literature, orderings of optimal allocations of policy limits and deductibles were established with respect to a policyholder’s preference. However, from the viewpoint of an insurer, the orderings are not enough for the purpose of pricing. In this paper, by applying the equivalent utility premium principle, we study worst allocations of policy limits and deductibles for an insurer, which give rise to the maximum fair premiums. Closed-form solutions are derived. Then we present a result concerning the optimality in a general risk-sharing scheme, by which we obtain optimal allocations for policyholders directly from worst allocations for an insurer. Several results in Cheung [Cheung, K.C., 2007. Optimal allocation of policy limits and deductibles. Insurance Math. Econom. 41, 382–391] are generalized here.     

On allocation of upper limits and deductibles with dependent frequencies and comonotonic severities

With the assumption of Archimedean copula for the occurrence frequencies of the risks covered by an insurance policy, this note further investigates the allocation problem of upper limits and deductibles addressed in Hua and Cheung (2008a). Sufficient conditions for a risk averse policyholder to well allocate the upper limits and the deductibles are built, respectively.     

Stochastic orders of scalar products with applications

In this paper, we study stochastic orders of scalar products of random vectors. Based on the study of Ma [Ma, C., 2000. Convex orders for linear combinations of random variables. J. Statist. Plann. Inference 84, 11-25], we first obtain more general conditions under which linear combinations of random variables can be ordered in the increasing convex order. As an application of this result, we consider the scalar product of two random vectors which separates the severity effect and the frequency effect in the study of the optimal allocation of policy limits and deductibles. Finally, we obtain the ordering of the optimal allocation of policy limits and deductibles when the dependence structure of the losses is unknown. This application is a further study of Cheung [Cheung, K.C., 2007. Optimal allocation of policy limits and deductibles. Insurance: Math. Econom. 41, 382-391].     

Optimal allocation of policy limits and deductibles

In this paper, we study the problems of optimal allocation of policy limits and deductibles. Several objective functions are considered: maximizing the expected utility of wealth assuming the losses are independent, minimizing the expected total retained loss and maximizing the expected utility of wealth when the dependence structure is unknown. Orderings of the optimal allocations are obtained.     

Optimal allocation of policy limits and deductibles

In this paper, we study the problems of optimal allocation of policy limits and deductibles. Several objective functions are considered: maximizing the expected utility of wealth assuming the losses are independent, minimizing the expected total retained loss and maximizing the expected utility of wealth when the dependence structure is unknown. Orderings of the optimal allocations are obtained.     

Asset proportions in optimal portfolios with dependent default risks

In this note, we consider the dependent default risk model of factor type. The dependence between the returns of assets is driven by default indicators. Sufficient conditions on the dependence structure of default indicators and on the utility function are investigated which enable one to order the optimal amount invested in each asset. We thus complement one result in [Cheung, K.C., Yang, H., 2004. Ordering optimal proportions in the asset allocation problem with dependent default risks. Insurance: Math. Econom. 35, 595-609].     

Estimating the distortion parameter of the proportional-hazard premium for heavy-tailed losses

The distortion parameter reflects the amount of loading in insurance premiums. A specific value of a given premium determines a value of the distortion parameter, which depends on the underlying loss distribution. Estimating the parameter, therefore, becomes a statistical inferential problem, which has been initiated by Jones and Zitikis [Jones, B.L., Zitikis, R., 2007. Risk measures, distortion parameters, and their empirical estimation. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 41, 279–297] in the case of the distortion premium and tackled within the framework of the central limit theorem. Heavy-tailed losses do not fall into this framework as they rely on the extreme-value theory. In this paper, we concentrate on a special but important distortion premium, called the proportional-hazard premium, and propose an estimator for its distortion parameter in the case of heavy-tailed losses. We derive an asymptotic distribution of the estimator, construct a practically implementable confidence interval for the distortion parameter, and illustrate the performance of the interval in a simulation study.     

Estimating the distortion parameter of the proportional-hazard premium for heavy-tailed losses

The distortion parameter reflects the amount of loading in insurance premiums. A specific value of a given premium determines a value of the distortion parameter, which depends on the underlying loss distribution. Estimating the parameter, therefore, becomes a statistical inferential problem, which has been initiated by Jones and Zitikis [Jones, B.L., Zitikis, R., 2007. Risk measures, distortion parameters, and their empirical estimation. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 41, 279–297] in the case of the distortion premium and tackled within the framework of the central limit theorem. Heavy-tailed losses do not fall into this framework as they rely on the extreme-value theory. In this paper, we concentrate on a special but important distortion premium, called the proportional-hazard premium, and propose an estimator for its distortion parameter in the case of heavy-tailed losses. We derive an asymptotic distribution of the estimator, construct a practically implementable confidence interval for the distortion parameter, and illustrate the performance of the interval in a simulation study.     

Characterizing optimal allocations in quantile-based risk sharing

Unlike classic risk sharing problems based on expected utilities or convex risk measures, quantile-based risk sharing problems exhibit two special features. First, quantile-based risk measures (such as the Value-at-Risk) are often not convex, and second, they ignore some part of the distribution of the risk. These features create technical challenges in establishing a full characterization of optimal allocations, a question left unanswered in the literature. In this paper, we address the issues on the existence and the characterization of (Pareto-)optimal allocations in risk sharing problems for the Range-Value-at-Risk family. It turns out that negative dependence, mutual exclusivity in particular, plays an important role in the optimal allocations, in contrast to positive dependence appearing in classic risk sharing problems. As a by-product of our main finding, we obtain some results on the optimization of the Value-at-Risk (VaR) and the Expected Shortfall, as well as a new result on the inf-convolution of VaR and a general distortion risk measure.     

Tail subadditivity of distortion risk measures and multivariate tail distortion risk measures

In this paper, we extend the concept of tail subadditivity (Belles-Sampera et al., 2014a; Belles-Sampera et al., 2014b) for distortion risk measures and give sufficient and necessary conditions for a distortion risk measure to be tail subadditive. We also introduce the generalized GlueVaR risk measures, which can be used to approach any coherent distortion risk measure. To further illustrate the applications of the tail subadditivity, we propose multivariate tail distortion (MTD) risk measures and generalize the multivariate tail conditional expectation (MTCE) risk measure introduced by Landsman et al. (2016). The properties of multivariate tail distortion risk measures, such as positive homogeneity, translation invariance, monotonicity, and subadditivity, are discussed as well. Moreover, we discuss the applications of the multivariate tail distortion risk measures in capital allocations for a portfolio of risks and explore the impacts of the dependence between risks in a portfolio and extreme tail events of a risk portfolio in capital allocations.     

How retention levels influence the variability of the total risk under reinsurance

Recently, Escudero and Ortega (Insur. Math. Econ. 43:255–262, 2008) have considered an extension of the largest claims reinsurance with arbitrary random retention levels. They have analyzed the effect of some dependencies on the Laplace transform of the retained total claim amount. In this note, we study how dependencies influence the variability of the retained and the reinsured total claim amount, under excess-loss and stop-loss reinsurance policies, with stochastic retention levels. Stochastic directional convexity properties, variability orderings, and bounds for the retained and the reinsured total risk are given. Some examples on the calculation of bounds for stop-loss premiums (i.e., the expected value of the reinsured total risk under this treaty) and for net premiums for the cedent company under excess-loss, and complementary results on convex comparisons of discounted values of benefits for the insurer from a portfolio with risks having random policy limits (deductibles) are derived.      

Allocating unfunded liability in pension valuation under uncertainty

This paper studied the cost allocation for the unfunded liability in a defined benefit pension scheme incorporating the stochastic phenomenon of its returns. In the recent literature represented by Cairns and Parker [Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 21 (1997) 43], Haberman [Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 11 (1992) 179; Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 13 (1993) 45; Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 14 (1994) 219; Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 14 (1997) 127], Owadally and Haberman [North American Actuarial Journal 3 (1999) 105], the fund level is modeled based on the plan dynamics and the returns are generated through several stochastic processes to reflect the current realistic economic perspective to see how the contribution changed as the cost allocation period increased. In this study, we generalize the previous constant value assumption in cost amortization by modeling the returns and valuation rates simultaneously. Taylor series expansion is employed to approximate the unconditional and conditional moments of the plan contribution and fund level. Hence the stability of the plan contribution and the fund size under different allocation periods could be estimated, which provide valuable information adding to the previous works.     

On the regulator–insurer interaction in a structural model

In this paper, we provide a new insight to the previous work of Briys and de Varenne [E. Briys, F. de Varenne, Life insurance in a contingent claim framework: Pricing and regulatory implications, Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Theory 19 (1) (1994) 53–72], Grosen and Jørgensen [A. Grosen, P.L. Jørgensen, Life insurance liabilities at market value: An analysis of insolvency risk, bonus policy, and regulatory intervention rules in a barrier option framework, Journal of Risk and Insurance 69 (1) (2002) 63–91] and Chen and Suchanecki [A. Chen, M. Suchanecki, Default risk, bankruptcy procedures and the market value of life insurance liabilities, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 40 (2007) 231–255]. We show that the particular risk management strategy followed by the insurance company can significantly change the risk exposure of the company, and that it should thus be taken into account by regulators. We first study how the regulator establishes regulation intervention levels in order to control for instance the default probability of the insurance company. This part of the analysis is based on a constant volatility. Given that the insurance company is informed of regulatory rules, we study how results can be significantly different when the insurance company follows a risk management strategy with non-constant volatilities. We thus highlight some limits of the prior literature and believe that the risk management strategy of the company should be taken into account in the estimation of the risk exposure as well as in that of the market value of liabilities.     

Behavioral optimal insurance

The present work studies the optimal insurance policy offered by an insurer adopting a proportional premium principle to an insured whose decision-making behavior is modeled by Kahneman and Tversky’s Cumulative Prospect Theory with convex probability distortions. We show that, under a fixed premium rate, the optimal insurance policy is a generalized insurance layer (that is, either an insurance layer or a stop–loss insurance). This optimal insurance decision problem is resolved by first converting it into three different sub-problems similar to those in Jin and Zhou (2008); however, as we now demand a more regular optimal solution, a completely different approach has been developed to tackle them. When the premium is regarded as a decision variable and there is no risk loading, the optimal indemnity schedule in this form has no deductibles but a cap; further results also suggests that the deductible amount will be reduced if the risk loading is decreased. As a whole, our paper provides a theoretical explanation for the popularity of limited coverage insurance policies in the market as observed by many socio-economists, which serves as a mathematical bridge between behavioral finance and actuarial science.     

人寿保险中的最优缴费模型

精算数学中 ,将自然保费制转化为现今的均衡保费制 ,精算师并未考虑投保人的最优缴费策略 .本文采用最优化方法对定期寿险保单的缴费方式进行了分析 .得出 ,当精算师计算保费的利息与“银行储蓄利率”相等时 ,均衡收缴保费是保险人的最优策略 ,否则应分别采用递增或递减缴费策略 .     

On allocations to portfolios of assets with statistically dependent potential risk returns

This note studies how the allocation impacts on the expected potential return of the portfolio of risk assets with some new dependence structures characterized through the orthant probability of their potential returns. As applications, we revisit the financial risk model and actuarial default risk model, and study the dependence structure of potential risk returns and the utility functions such that in the optimal allocations the assets are arranged in ascending order. The main results complement some related ones of Cheung and Yang (2004) and Chen and Hu (2008).     

Some new notions of dependence with applications in optimal allocation problems

Dependence structures of multiple risks play an important role in optimal allocation problems for insurance, quantitative risk management, and finance. However, in many existing studies on these problems, risks or losses are often assumed to be independent or comonotonic or exchangeable. In this paper, we propose several new notions of dependence to model dependent risks and give their characterizations through the probability measures or distributions of the risks or through the expectations of the transformed risks. These characterizations are related to the properties of arrangement increasing functions and the proposed notions of dependence incorporate many typical dependence structures studied in the literature for optimal allocation problems. We also develop the properties of these dependence structures. We illustrate the applications of these notions in the optimal allocation problems of deductibles and policy limits and in capital reserves problems. These applications extend many existing researches to more general dependent risks.     

The fundamental theorem of mutual insurance

The essence of mutual insurance is the notion that re-distributing risk in a pool of risks is more beneficial than taking the risk alone. Interpreting ‘more beneficial’ as an increase in utility and considering sequences of exchangeable risks, we are able to formalize this notion from the policyholder’s perspective and demonstrate its validity for various alternative preference functionals (e.g., expected utility, Choquet expected utility, and distortion risk measures). To obtain this result, we exploit that for a sequence of exchangeable risks the corresponding sequence of arithmetical averages is a reversed martingale.We conclude that pooling risks is fundamental for understanding the mechanisms of insurance because it favourably affects the utility of policyholders, and we refer to this phenomenon as the ‘utility-improving effect of risk pooling’. Moreover, we demonstrate that the utility of the policyholder is (strictly) increasing with the size of the risk pool.