Synthesis,Structures, and Reactivities of Pincer‐Type Ruthenium Complexes Bearing Two Proton‐Responsive Pyrazole Arms

A new metal–ligand bifunctional, pincer‐type ruthenium complex [RuCl( L1‐H2 )(PPh₃)₂]Cl ( 1 ; L1‐H2 =2,6‐bis(5‐tert‐butyl‐1H‐pyrazol‐3‐yl)pyridine) featuring two proton‐delivering pyrazole arms has been synthesized. Complex 1 , derived from [RuCl₂(PPh₃)₃] with L1‐H2 , underwent reversible deprotonation with potassium carbonate to afford the pyrazolato–pyrazole complex [RuCl(L1‐H)(PPh₃)₂] ( 2 ). Further deprotonation of 1 and 2 with potassium hexamethyldisilazide in methanol resulted in the formation of the bis(pyrazolato) complex [Ru(L1)(MeOH)(PPh₃)₂] ( 3 ). Complex 3 smoothly reacted with dioxygen and dinitrogen to give the side‐on peroxo complex [Ru(L1)(O₂)(PPh₃)₂] ( 4 ) and end‐on dinitrogen complex [Ru(L1)(N₂)(PPh₃)₂] ( 5 ), respectively. On the other hand, the reaction of [RuCl₂(PPh₃)₃] with less hindered 2,6‐di(1H‐pyrazol‐3‐yl)pyridine ( L3‐H2 ) led to the formation of the dinuclear complex [{RuCl₂(PPh₃)₂}₂(μ₂‐ L3‐H2 )₂] ( 6 ), in which the pyrazole‐based ligand adopted a tautomeric form different from L1‐H2 in 1 and the central pyridine remained uncoordinated. The detailed structures of 1 , 2 , 3 , 3.MeOH , 4 , 5 , 6 were determined by X‐ray crystallography.     

Fine‐Tuning the Reactivity and Stability by Systematic Ligand Variations in CpCoI Complexes as Catalysts for [2+2+2] Cycloaddition Reactions

CpCo^I‐olefin‐phosphite and CpCo^I‐bisphosphite complexes were systematically prepared and their reactivity in [2+2+2] cycloaddition reactions compared with highly active [CpCo(H₂C?CHSiMe₃)₂] ( 1 ). Whereas 1 is an excellent precursor for the synthesis of [CpCo(olefin)(phosphite)] complexes ( 2 a – f ), [CpCo(phosphite)₂] complexes ( 3 a – e ) were prepared photochemically from [CpCo(cod)]. The complexes were evaluated in the cyclotrimerization reaction of diynes with nitriles yielding pyridines. For [CpCo(olefin)(phosphite)], as well as some of the [CpCo(phosphite)₂] complexes, reaction temperatures as low as 50 °C were sufficient to perform the cycloaddition reaction. A direct comparison showed that the order of reactivity for the complex ligands was olefin₂>olefin/phosphite>phosphites₂. The complexes with mixed ligands favorably combine reactivity and stability. Calculations on the ligand dissociation from [CpCo(olefin)(phosphite)] proved that the phosphite is dissociating before the olefin. [CpCo(H₂C?CHSiMe₃){P(OPh)₃}] ( 2 a ) was investigated for the co‐cyclization of diynes and nitriles and found to be an efficient catalyst at rather mild temperatures.     

Synthesis,Structure, and Reactivity of Hydridoiridium Complexes Bearing a Pincer‐Type PSiP Ligand

A series of iridium tetrahydride complexes [Ir(H)₄(PSiP‐R)] bearing a tridentate pincer‐type bis(phosphino)silyl ligand ([{2‐(R₂P)C₆H₄}₂MeSi]⁻, PSiP‐R, R=Cy, iPr, or tBu) were synthesized by the reduction of [IrCl(H)(PSiP‐R)] with Me₄N ⋅ BH₄ under argon. The same reaction under a nitrogen atmosphere afforded a rare example of thermally stable iridium(III)–dinitrogen complexes, [Ir(H)₂(N₂)(PSiP‐R)]. Two isomeric dinitrogen complexes were produced, in which the PSiP ligand coordinated to the iridium center in meridional and facial orientations, respectively. Attempted substitution of the dinitrogen ligand in [Ir(H)₂(N₂)(PSiP‐Cy)] with PMe₃ required heating at 150 °C to give the expected [Ir(H)₂(PMe₃)(PSiP‐Cy)] and a trigonal bipyramidal iridium(I)–dinitrogen complex, [Ir(N₂)(PMe₃)(PSiP‐Cy)]. The reaction of [Ir(H)₄(PSiP‐Cy)] with three equivalents of 2‐norbornene (nbe) in benzene afforded [Ir^I(nbe)(PSiP‐Cy)] in a high yield, while a similar reaction of [Ir(H)₄(PSiP‐R)] with an excess of 3,3‐dimethylbutene (tbe) in benzene gave the C H bond activation product, [Ir^III(H)(Ph)(PSiP‐R)], in high yield. The oxidative addition of benzene is reversible; heating [Ir^III(H)(Ph)(PSiP‐Cy)] in the presence of PPh₃ in benzene resulted in reductive elimination of benzene, coordination of PPh₃, and activation of the C H bond of one aromatic ring in PPh₃. [Ir^III(H)(Ph)(PSiP‐R)] catalyzed a direct borylation reaction of the benzene C H bond with bis(pinacolato)diboron. Molecular structures of most of the new complexes in this study were determined by a single‐crystal X‐ray analysis.     

Selective and Efficient Cycloisomerization of Alkynols Catalyzed by a New Ruthenium Complex with a Tetradentate Nitrogen–Phosphorus Mixed Ligand

The new ruthenium complex [Ru(N₃P)(OAc)][BPh₄] ( 4 ), in which N₃P is the N,P mixed tetradentate ligand N,N‐bis[(pyridin‐2‐yl)methyl]‐[2‐(diphenylphosphino)phenyl]methanamine was synthesized. The complex was found to be catalytically active for the endo cycloisomerization of alkynols. The catalytic reactions can be used to synthesize five‐, six‐, and seven‐membered endo‐cyclic enol ethers in good to excellent yields. A catalytic cycle involving a vinylidene intermediate was proposed for the catalytic reactions. Treatment of complex 4 with PhC?CH and H₂O gave the alkyl complex [Ru(CH₂Ph)(CO)(N₃P)][BPh₄] ( 30 ), which supports the assumption that the catalytic reactions involve addition of a hydroxyl group to the C?C bond of vinylidene ligands.     

Vielseitige Koordinationschemie von Vanadium(V): Substitutionsreaktionen,Umlagerungen und Kondensationsreaktionen von Oxovanadium(V)‐Komplexen des tripodalen Sauerstoffliganden LOMe− = [η5‐(C5H5)Co{P(OMe)2(O)}3]−

Multifaceted Coordination Chemistry of Vanadium(V): Substitution, Rearrangement Reactions, and Condensation Reactions of Oxovanadium(V) Complexes of the Tripodal Oxygen Ligand L_OMe^? = [η⁵‐(C₅H₅)Co{P(OMe)₂(O)}₃]^? The octahedral oxovanadium(V) complex [V(O)F₂L_OMe] of the tripodal oxygen ligand L_OMe^? = [η⁵‐(C₅H₅)Co{P(OMe)₂(O)}₃]^? reacts with alcohols and phenol with substitution of one fluoride ligand to form alkoxo complexes [V(O)F(OR)L_OMe], R = Me, Et, i‐Prop, Ph. In the presence of water, however, both fluoride ions are substituted and a complex with the composition VO₂L_OMe can be isolated. The crystal structure shows that the oxo‐bridged trimer [{V(O)(L_OMe)O}₃] was synthesized. In the presence of BF₃ the fluoride ligand in the alkoxo‐complex [V(O)F(OEt)L_OMe] can be exchanged for pyridine to yield [V(O)(OEt)pyL_OMe]BF₄. Analogous attempts to exchange the fluoride ligand for tetrahydrofuran and acetonitrile induces a rearrangement reaction that leads to the vanadium complex [V(O)(L_OMe)₂]BF₄. The crystal structure of this compound has been determined. Its ¹H and ³¹P‐NMR spectra show that it is a highly fluxional vanadium complex at ambient temperature in solution. The two tripodal ligands L_OMe^? coordinate the vanadium centre as bidentate or tridentate ligands. The exchange bidentate/tridentate becomes slow on the NMR time scale below about 200 K.     

Synthesis and Characterization of Di‐ and Tricarbonylhydridomanganese(I) Complexes

Hydrido complexes [MnH(CO)₃L^1–3] [L¹ = 1,2‐bis‐(diphenylphosphanoxy)‐ethane ( 1 ); L² = 1,2‐bis‐(diisopropylphosphanoxy)ethane ( 2 ); L³ = 1,3‐bis‐(diphenylphosphanoxy)‐propane ( 3 )] were prepared by treating [MnH(CO)₅] with the appropriate bidentate ligand by heating to reflux. Photoirradiation of a toluene solution of complexes 1 and 2 in the presence of PPh_n(OR)_3–n (n = 0, 1; R = Me, Et) leads to the replacement of a CO ligand by the corresponding monodentate phosphite or phosphonite ligand to give new hydrido compounds of formula [MnH(CO)₂(L^1–2)(L)] [L = P(OMe)₃ ( 1a – 2a ); P(OEt)₃ ( 1b – 2b ); PPh(OMe)₂ ( 1c – 2c ); PPh(OEt)₂ ( 1d – 2d )]. All complexes were characterized by IR, ¹H, ¹³C and ³¹P NMR spectroscopy. In case of compounds 2 and 3 , suitable crystals for X‐ray diffraction studies were isolated.     

Synthetic,Spectroscopic and Structural Studies of the Rhenium(I) Dicarbonyl Complexes of Phosphite,Phosphonite, and Phosphinite Ligands: cis,mer‐[ReBr(CO)2{PPh3‐n(OR)n}3] (R = Me,Et; n = 1—3)

The reaction of [ReBr(CO)₅] with phosphite and phosphonite ligands in toluene yielded cis, mer‐[ReBr(CO)₂L₃] ( 2 : L = P(OMe)₃ 2a : P(OEt)₃ 2b : PPh(OMe)₂ 2c : PPh(OEt)₂ 2d ). Compounds 2c and 2d were also obtained, as were the phosphinite complexes 2e [L = PPh₂(OMe)] and 2f [L = PPh₂(OEt)], by reaction of the corresponding phosphorus ligand with trans, mer‐[ReBr(CO)₃L₂]. Compounds 2 were all characterized by elemental analysis, mass spectrometry and NMR spectroscopy, and the structures of 2b , 2c and 2d were determined by X‐ray diffractometry. Compounds 2a‐d are stable in chloroform and dichloromethane, but 2e and 2f are transformed into the corresponding trans, mer‐[ReBr(CO)₃L₂] complexes by a reaction for which a partial mechanism is put forward.     

Systematische Studie zu den Koordinationseigenschaften des Guanidin‐Liganden Bis(tetramethylguanidino)propan mit den Metallen Mangan,Cobalt, Nickel,Zink, Cadmium,Quecksilber und Silber

The transition metal complexes with the ligand 1,3‐bis(N,N,N′,N′‐tetramethylguanidino)propane (btmgp), [Mn(btmgp)Br₂] ( 1 ), [Co(btmgp)Cl₂] ( 2 ), [Ni(btmgp)I₂] ( 3 ), [Zn(btmgp)Cl₂] ( 4 ), [Zn(btmgp)(O₂CCH₃)₂] ( 5 ), [Cd(btmgp)Cl₂] ( 6 ), [Hg(btmgp)Cl₂] ( 7 ) and [Ag₂(btmgp)₂][ClO₄]₂·2MeCN ( 8 ), were prepared and characterised for the first time. The stoichiometric reaction of the corresponding water‐free metal salts with the ligand btmgp in dry MeCN or THF resulted in the straightforward formation of the mononuclear complexes 1 – 7 and the binuclear complex 8 . In complexes with M^II the metal ion shows a distorted tetrahedral coordination whereas in 8 , the coordination of the M^I ion is almost linear. The coordination behavior of btmgp and resulting structural parameters of the corresponding complexes were discussed in an comparative approach together with already described complexes of btmgp and the bisguanidine ligand N¹,N²‐bis(1,3‐dimethylimidazolidin‐2‐ylidene)‐ethane‐1,2‐diamine (DMEG₂e), respectively.     

Ligand‐Centred Reactivity of Bis(picolyl)amine Iridium: Sequential Deprotonation,Oxidation and Oxygenation of a “Non‐Innocent” Ligand

Treatment of [Ir(bpa)(cod)]⁺ complex [ 1 ]⁺ with a strong base (e.g., tBuO^?) led to unexpected double deprotonation to form the anionic [Ir(bpa?2H)(cod)]^? species [ 3 ]^?, via the mono‐deprotonated neutral amido complex [Ir(bpa?H)(cod)] as an isolable intermediate. A certain degree of aromaticity of the obtained metal–chelate ring may explain the favourable double deprotonation. The rhodium analogue [ 4 ]^? was prepared in situ. The new species [M(bpa?2H)(cod)]^? (M=Rh, Ir) are best described as two‐electron reduced analogues of the cationic imine complexes [M^I(cod)(Py‐CH₂‐N?CH‐Py)]⁺. One‐electron oxidation of [ 3 ]^? and [ 4 ]^? produced the ligand radical complexes [ 3 ]^. and [ 4 ]^.. Oxygenation of [ 3 ]^? with O₂ gave the neutral carboxamido complex [Ir(cod)(py‐CH₂‐N‐CO‐py)] via the ligand radical complex [ 3 ]^. as a detectable intermediate.     

A mixed chloride/trifluoromethanesulfonate ligand species in a ruthenium(II) complex

The compound [2‐(aminomethyl)pyridine‐κ²N,N′][chlorido/trifluoromethanesulfonato(0.91/0.09)][(10,11‐η)‐5H‐dibenzo[a,d]cyclohepten‐5‐amine‐κN](triphenylphosphane‐κP)ruthenium(II) trifluoromethanesulfonate dichloromethane 0.91‐solvate, [Ru(CF₃SO₃)_0.09Cl_0.91(C₆H₈N₂)(C₁₅H₁₃N)(C₁₈H₁₅P)]CF₃SO₃·0.91CH₂Cl₂, belongs to a series of Ru^II complexes that had been tested for transfer hydrogenation, hydrogenation of polar bonds and catalytic transfer hydrogenation. The crystal structure determination of this complex revealed disorder in the form of two different anionic ligands sharing the same coordination site, which other spectroscopic methods failed to characterize. The reduced catalytic activity of the title compound was not fully understood until the crystallographic data provided evidence for the mixed ligand species. The crystal structure clearly shows that the majority of the synthesized material has a chloride ligand present. Only a small portion of the material is the expected complex [Ru^II(OTf)(ampy)(η²‐tropNH₂)(PPh₃)]OTf, where OTf is triflate or trifluoromethanesulfonate, ampy is 2‐(aminomethyl)pyridine and tropNH₂ is 5H‐dibenzo[a,d]cyclohepten‐5‐amine.     

An NHC–Silyl–NHC Pincer Ligand for the Oxidative Addition of C−H,N−H,and O−H Bonds to Cobalt(I) Complexes

N‐Heterocyclic carbene based pincer ligands bearing a central silyl donor, [CSiC]⁻, have been envisioned as a class of strongly σ‐donating ligands that can be used for synthesizing electron‐rich transition‐metal complexes for the activation of inert bonds. However, this type of pincer ligand and complexes thereof have remained elusive owing to their challenging synthesis. We herein describe the first synthesis of a CSiC pincer ligand scaffold through the coupling of a silyl–NHC chelate with a benzyl–NHC chelate induced by one‐electron oxidation in the coordination sphere of a cobalt complex. The monoanionic CSiC ligand stabilizes the Co^I dinitrogen complex [(CSiC)Co(N₂)] with an unusual coordination geometry and enables the challenging oxidative addition of E−H bonds (E=C, N, O) to Co^I to form Co^III complexes. The structure and reactivity of the cobalt(I) complex are ascribed to the unique electronic properties of the CSiC pincer ligand, which provides a strong trans effect and pronounced σ‐donation.     

A new heteroleptic cuprous complex with strong yellow photoluminescence

In the title heteroleptic cuprous complex, (acetonitrile‐κN)({2‐[2‐(diphenylphosphanyl)phenoxy]phenyl}diphenylphosphane‐κ²P,P′)[2‐(pyridin‐4‐yl‐κN)‐1,3‐benzoxazole]copper(I) hexafluoridophosphate, [Cu(C₃₆H₂₈OP₂)(CH₃CN)(C₁₂H₈N₂O)]PF₆, conventionally abbreviated [Cu(POP)(CH₃CN)(4‐PBO)]PF₆, where POP is the diphosphane ligand {2‐[2‐(diphenylphosphanyl)phenoxy]phenyl}diphenylphosphane and 4‐PBO is the N‐containing ligand 2‐(pyridin‐4‐yl)‐1,3‐benzoxazole, the asymmetric unit consists of a hexafluoridophosphate anion and a whole mononuclear cation, where the Cu^I centre is coordinated by two P atoms from the POP ligand, by one N atom from the 4‐PBO ligand and by the N atom of the coordinated acetonitrile molecule, giving rise to a CuP₂N₂ distorted tetrahedral coordination geometry. The electronic absorption, photoluminescence and thermal stability properties of this complex have been studied on as‐synthesized samples, which had previously been examined by powder X‐ray diffraction. A yellow emission signal is attributed to an excited state arising from metal‐to‐ligand charge transfer (MLCT).     

Steric Effects on the Structures,Reactivity, and Coordination Chemistry of Tris(2‐pyridyl)aluminates

Introducing substituents in the 6‐position of the 2‐pyridyl rings of tris(pyridyl)aluminate anions, of the type [EtAl(2‐py′)₃]^? (py′=a substituted 2‐pyridyl group), has a large impact on their metal coordination characteristics. This is seen most remarkably in the desolvation of the THF solvate [EtAl(6‐Me‐2‐py)₃Li?THF] to give the monomer [EtAl(6‐Me‐2‐py)₃Li] ( 1 ), containing a pyramidal, three‐coordinate Li⁺ cation. Similar monomeric complexes are observed for [EtAl(6‐CF₃‐2‐py)₃Li] ( 2 ) and [EtAl(6‐Br‐2‐py)₃Li] ( 3 ), which contain CF₃ and Br substituents (R). This steric influence can be exploited in the synthesis of a new class of terminal Al?OH complexes, as is seen in the controlled hydrolysis of 2 and 3 to give [EtAl(OH)(6‐R‐2‐py)₂]^? anions, as in the dimer [EtAl(OH)(6‐Br‐2‐py)₂Li]₂ ( 5 ). Attempts to deprotonate the Al?OH group of 5 using Et₂Zn led only to the formation of the zincate complex [LiZn(6‐Br‐py)₃]₂ ( 6 ), while reactions of the 6‐Br substituted 3 and the unsubstituted complex [EtAl(2‐py)₃Li] with MeOH give [EtAl(OMe)(6‐Br‐2‐py)₂Li]₂ ( 7 ) and [EtAl(OMe)(2‐py)₂Li]₂ ( 8 ), respectively, having similar dimeric arrangements to 5 . The combined studies presented provide key synthetic methods for the functionalization and elaboration of tris(pyridyl)aluminate ligands.     

β‐Hydrogen Elimination Reactions of Nickel and Palladium Methoxides Stabilised by PCP Pincer Ligands

Nickel and palladium methoxides [(^iPrPCP)M‐OMe], which contain the ^iPrPCP pincer ligand, decompose upon heating to give products of different kinds. The palladium derivative cleanly gives the dimeric Pd⁰ complex [Pd(μ‐^iPrPCHP)]₂ (^iPrPCHP=2,6‐bis(diisopropylphosphinomethyl)phenyl) and formaldehyde. In contrast, decomposition of [(^iPrPCP)Ni‐OMe] affords polynuclear carbonyl phosphine complexes. Both decomposition processes are initiated by β‐hydrogen elimination (BHE), but the resulting [(^iPrPCP)M‐H] hydrides undergo divergent reaction sequences that ultimately lead to the irreversible breakdown of the pincer units. Whereas the Pd hydride spontaneously experiences reductive C?H coupling, the decay of its Ni analogue is brought about by its reaction with formaldehyde released in the BHE step. Kinetic measurements showed that the BHE reaction is reversible and less favourable for Ni than for Pd for both kinetic and thermodynamic reasons. DFT calculations confirmed the main conclusions of the kinetic studies and provided further insight into the mechanisms of the decomposition reactions.     

Effect of Chelate Ring Size in Iron(II) Isothiocyanato Complexes with Tetradentate Tripyridyl‐alkylamine Ligands on Spin Crossover Properties

Iron(II) complexes of the type [Fe(L)(NCS)₂] with tetradentate ligands L are well known to show spin crossover properties. However, this behavior is quite sensitive in regard to small changes of the ligand system. Starting from the thoroughly investigated complex [Fe(tmpa)(NCS)₂] [tmpa = tris(2‐pyridylmethyl)amine, also abbreviated as tpa in the literature] we modified the ligand by increasing systematically the chelate ring sizes from 5 to 6 thus obtaining complexes [Fe(pmea)(NCS)₂], [Fe(pmap)(NCS)₂], and [Fe(tepa)(NCS)₂] [pmea = N,N‐bis[(2‐pyridyl)methyl]‐2‐(2‐pyridyl)ethylamine, pmap = N,N‐bis[2‐(2‐pyridyl)ethyl]‐(2‐pyridyl)methylamine, and tepa = tris[2‐(2‐pyridyl)ethyl]amine]. All complexes were structurally characterized and spin crossover properties were investigated using Mößbauer spectroscopy, magnetic measurements, and IR/Raman analyses. The results demonstrated that only the iron complexes with tmpa and pmea showed spin crossover properties, whereas the complexes with the ligands pmap and tepa only formed high spin complexes. Furthermore, DFT calculations supported these findings demonstrating again the strong influence of ligand environment. Herein the effect of increasing the chelate ring sizes in iron(II) isothiocyanato complexes with tetradentate tripyridyl‐alkylamine ligands is clearly demonstrated.     

Synthesis of Co2Pt, Co2Pd and MoPd2 mixed-metal clusters with the P–N–P assembling ligands (Ph2P)2NH (dppa) and (Ph2P)2NMe (dppaMe). Crystal structure of [Co2Pt(μ3-CO)(CO)6(μ-dppa)]

Heterometallic triangular platinum–cobalt, palladium–cobalt and palladium–molybdenum clusters stabilized by one or two bridging diphosphine ligands such as Ph₂PNHPPh₂ (dppa) or (Ph₂P)₂NMe (dppaMe) or by mixed ligand sets Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂ (dppm)/dppa have been prepared with the objectives of comparing the stability and properties of the clusters as a function of the short-bite diphosphine ligand used and of the metal carbonyl fragment they contain. Ligand redistribution reactions were observed during the purification of [Co₂Pd(μ₃-CO)(CO)₄(μ-dppa)(μ-dppm)] (4) by column chromatography with the formation of [Co₂Pd(μ₃-CO)(CO)₄(μ-dppm)₂] and the dinuclear complex [(OC)₂ Cl] (5). The latter was independently prepared by reaction of [Pd(dppa-P,P′)₂](BF₄)₂ with Na[Co(CO)₄]. Attempts to directly incorporate the ligand (Ph₂P)₂N(CH₂)₃Si(OMe)₃ (dppaSi) into a cluster or to generate it by N-functionalization of coordinated dppa were unsuccessful, in contrast to results obtained recently with related clusters. The crystal structure of [Co₂Pt(μ₃-CO)(CO)₆(μ-dppa)] (1) has been determined by X-ray diffraction.     

The first phosphite complex of a metalloporphyrin

(Di­phenyl phosphite‐κO)(5,10,15,20‐tetra­phenyl­porphyrinato‐κ⁴N)­manganese(III) hexa­fluoro­antimonate(V), [Mn(C₄₄H₂₈N₄)(C₁₂H₁₁O₃P)](SbF₆), is the first example of a structurally characterized di­aryl or di­alkyl phosphite complex of a metal–porphyrin ion. The axial phosphite ligand binds to the Mn^III ion via the P=O O atom, affording a nominally five‐coordinate complex with an Mn—O distance of 2.120 (4) Å. The mean porphyrin Mn—N distance is 2.000 (4) Å and the Mn^III ion is displaced from the 24‐atom porphyrin mean plane by 0.1548 (13) Å towards the axial O atom. The porphyrin adopts a marked saddle conformation, with a small domed component. The saddle distortion of the porphyrin ligand reflects the tight back‐to‐back dimers formed in the lattice by pairs of neighboring cations. The `non‐covalent' dimers in the lattice exhibit an unusual (weak) η²‐type coordination of a pyrrole C=C bond from a neighboring mol­ecule, with Mn^III⃛C distances of 3.697 (5) and 3.537 (5) Å.     

A tungsten complex containing a highly delocalized metal–ligand system

Nucleophilic attack of (triphenylphosphonio)cyclopentadienide on the dichlorodiazomethane–tungsten complex trans‐[BrW(dppe)₂(N₂CCl₂)]PF₆ [dppe is 1,2‐bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane] results in C—C bond formation and affords the title compound, trans‐[W(C₂₄H₁₈ClN₂P)Br(C₂₆H₂₄P₂)₂]PF₆·0.6CH₂Cl₂. This complex, bis[1,2‐bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane]bromido{chloro[3‐(triphenylphosphonio)cyclopentadienylidene]diazomethanediido}tungsten hexafluorophosphate dichloromethane 0.6‐solvate, contains the previously unknown ligand chloro[3‐(triphenylphosphonio)cyclopentadienylidene]diazomethane. Evidence from bond lengths and torsion angles indicates significant through‐ligand delocalization of electron density from tungsten to the nominally cationic phosphorus(V) centre. This structural analysis clearly demonstrates that the tungsten–dinitrogen unit is a powerful π‐electron donor with the ability to transfer electron density from the metal to a distant acceptor centre through an extended conjugated ligand system. As a consequence, complexes of this type could have potential applications as nonlinear optical materials and molecular semiconductors.     

Luminescent mononuclear and dinuclear cycloplatinated (II) complexes comprising azide and phosphine ancillary ligands

A new series of cycloplatinated (II) complexes with general formulas of [Pt (bhq)(N₃)(P)] [bhq = deprotonated 7,8‐benzo[h]quinoline, P = triphenyl phosphine (PPh₃) and methyldiphenyl phosphine], [Pt (bhq)(P^P)]N₃ [P^P = 1,1‐bis (diphenylphosphino)methane (dppm) and 1,2‐bis (diphenylphosphino)ethane] and [Pt₂(bhq)₂(μ‐P^P)(N₃)₂] [P^P = dppm and 1,2‐bis (diphenylphosphino)acetylene] is reported in this investigation. A combination of azide (N₃^?) and phosphine (monodentate and bidentate) was used as ancillary ligands to study their influences on the chromophoric cyclometalated ligand. All complexes were characterized by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. To confirm the presence of the N₃^? ligand directly connected to the platinum center, complex [Pt (bhq)(N₃)(PPh₃)] was further characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray crystallography. The photophysical properties of the new products were studied by UV–Vis spectroscopy in CH₂Cl₂ and photoluminescence spectroscopy in solid state (298 or 77 K) and in solution (77 K). Using density functional theory calculations, it was proved that, in addition to intraligand charge‐transfer (ILCT) and metal‐to‐ligand charge‐transfer (MLCT) transitions, the L′LCT (L′ = N₃, L = C^N) electronic transition has a remarkable contribution in low energy bands of the absorption spectra (for complexes [Pt (bhq)(N₃)(P)] and [Pt₂(bhq)₂(μ‐P^P)(N₃)₂]). It is indicative of the determining role of the N₃^? ligand in electronic transitions of these complexes, specifically in the low energy region. In this regard, the photoluminescence studies indicated that the emissions in such complexes originate from a mixed ³ILCT/³MLCT (intramolecular) and also from aggregations (intermolecular).     

Cobalt (II) and Copper (I) Complexes of Rigid Bidentate [N‐(2, 6‐Diisopropyl‐phenyl)imino]acenapthenone Ligand: Synthesis and Structural Studies

The cobalt(II) complex [CoCl₂(2, 6‐iPrC₆H₃‐BIAO)]₂ ( 1 ) of rigid unsymmetrical imine, carbonyl mixed ligand [N‐(2, 6‐diisopropylphenyl)‐imino]acenapthenone] (2, 6‐iPrC₆H₃‐BIAO) ( L1 ) can be achieved by the reaction of CoCl₂ and neutral [N‐(2, 6‐diisopropylphenyl)‐imino]acenapthenone] ligand. When ligand L1 reacted with CuCl in dichloromethane solution, only nitrogen coordinated copper complex [CuCl(2, 6‐iPrC₆H₃‐BIAO)] ( 2 ) was obtained. In the solid‐state structure, compound 1 is dimeric through the chelating two μ₂ chlorine atoms and each cobalt atom adopts either a distorted trigonal bipyramidal or a distorted square pyramidal arrangement. In contrast, the molecular structure of compound 2 reveals that copper is coordinated by imino nitrogen and adopts a linear arrangement around the central metal atom. The crystal structure of the rigid bidentate mixed nitrogen and oxygen ligand (2, 6‐iPrC₆H₃‐BIAO) ( L1 ) is also reported.