Crutch or Catalyst: Teachers' Beliefs and Practices Regarding Calculator use in Mathematics Instruction

This study investigated K‐12 teachers' beliefs and reported teaching practices regarding calculator use in their mathematics instruction. A survey was administered to more than 800 elementary, middle and high school teachers in a large metropolitan area to address the following questions: (a) what are the beliefs and practices of mathematics teachers regarding calculator use? and (b) how do these beliefs and practices differ among teachers in three grade bands? Factor analysis of 20 Likert scale items revealed four factors that accounted for 54% of the variance in the ratings. These factors were named Catalyst Beliefs, Teacher Knowledge, Crutch Beliefs, and Teacher Practices. Compared to elementary teachers, high school teachers were significantly higher in their perception of calculator use as a catalyst in mathematics instruction. However, the higher the grade level of the teacher, the higher the mean score on the perception that calculator use may be a way of getting answers without understanding mathematical processes. The mean scores for teachers in all three grade bands indicated agreement that students can learn mathematics through calculator use and using calculators in instruction will lead to better student understanding and make mathematics more interesting. The survey results shed light on teachers' self reported beliefs, knowledge, and practices in regard to consistency with elements of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Principles and Standards for School Mathematics (2000) technology principle and the NCTM use of technology position paper (2003). This study extended previous research on teachers' beliefs regarding calculator use in classrooms by examining and comparing the results of teacher surveys across three grade bands.     

Calculator Use on NAEP: A Look at Fourth‐ and Eighth‐Grade Mathematics Achievement

This article summarizes research conducted on calculator block items from the 2007 fourth‐ and eighth‐grade National Assessment of Educational Progress Main Mathematics. Calculator items from the assessment were categorized into two categories: problem‐solving items and noncomputational mathematics concept items. A calculator has the potential to be used as a problem‐solving tool for items categorized in the first category. On the other hand, there are no practical uses for calculators for noncomputational mathematics concept items. Item‐level performance data were disaggregated by student‐reported calculator use to investigate the differences in achievement of those fourth‐ and eighth‐grade students who chose to use calculators versus those who did not, and whether or not the nation's fourth and eighth graders are able to identify items where calculator use serves as an aide for solving a given mathematical problem. Results from the analysis show that eighth graders, in particular, benefit most from the use of calculators on problem‐solving items. A small percentage of students at both grade levels attempted to use a calculator to solve problems in the noncomputational mathematics concept category (items in which the use of a calculator does not serve as a tool to solve the problem).     

Controlling Choice: Teachers,Students, and Manipulatives in Mathematics Classrooms

This research study examines the instructional practices of 10 middle grades teachers related to their use of manipulatives in teaching mathematics and their control of mathematics tools during instruction. Through 40 observations of teaching, 30 interviews, and an examination of 67 written documents (including teachers' plans and records), profiles were developed that describe how teachers used and controlled manipulatives during instruction. Results showed that teachers used a variety of manipulatives and other mathematics tools over the course of the year‐long study. Teachers reported using a mathematics tool (manipulative, calculator, or measuring device) in 70% of their lessons, and this self‐report was verified by observations in which teachers used mathematics tools in 68% of their lessons. During a 3‐ to 4‐month period of “free access,” in which students had some measure of control in their selection and use of the mathematics tools, the students used manipulatives spontaneously and selectively. During free access, teachers exhibited various behaviors, including posting lists of items on containers, assigning group leaders to manage tools, and negotiating the control of the mathematics tools during instruction.     

Calculators in Elementary School Mathematics Instruction

Due to the increased availability of hand-held calculators, teachers at all grade levels must now face the prospect of having to change both how they teach mathematics as well as what mathematics they teach. Since most teachers did not learn mathematics with the help of technology, they need time to adjust to both a new learning environment and a new teaching one. Through federal funds, the Texas Education Agency has created mathematics staff development modules which help teachers learn about calculators, mathematics, and the integration of calculators in mathematics instruction. This article presents games based upon those included in the staff development modules. Each game was designed to promote exploration of mathematical relationships via a calculator, specifically, Texas Instrument's Math Explorer.     

Teaching Mathematics and Science in Urban Elementary Schools

Elementary teachers from a large urban school district with a 74 percent minority student population were surveyed to assess their capacity to provide quality mathematics and science instruction. Forty-nine percent of the surveys distributed to a random sample of teachers were returned. Both strengths and barriers to capacity building were identified. Strengths included use of collaborative student work, manipulatives, informal learning environments, and alternative assessment practices; availability of calculators and computers; and high expectations for student learning. Barriers included lack of professional development, infrequent science instruction, limited calculator use, lack of planning time, inadequate resources, and the perception that science was not valued as highly as mathematics.     

Secondary Science Teachers' Use of Microcomputers During Instruction

One hundred seventy-nine secondary science department chairs answered a 20-item questionnaire concerning the nature and extent of microcomputer use in science instruction in their respective schools. The national sample represented schools in rural, urban, and suburban settings, as well as all geographic regions of the country. Analyses of data revealed that 47% of the secondary science teachers did not use microcomputers during instruction, 40% used them occasionally, and 13% used them in one or more lessons each week. The most frequent applications were simulations (70%), graphing packages (63%), and probes for collecting laboratory data (56%). In addition, 76% of the respondents indicated that microcomputers have had an impact on science laboratory activities in their schools. The department chairs also listed their perceived reasons as to why teachers in their departments did or did not integrate microcomputer use into their science instruction.     

Planning District‐Wide Professional Development: Insights Gained From Teachers and Students Regarding Mathematics Teaching in a Large Urban District

This paper describes the mechanism used to gain insights into the state of the art of mathematics instruction in a large urban district in order to design meaningful professional development for the teachers in the district. Surveys of close to 2,000 elementary, middle school, and high school students were collected in order to assess the instructional practices used in mathematics classes across the district. Students were questioned about the frequency of use of various instructional practices that support the meaningful learning of mathematics. These included practices such as problem solving, use of calculators and computers, group work, homework, discussions, and projects, among others. Responses were analyzed and comparisons were drawn between elementary and middle school students' responses and between middle school and high school responses. Finally, fifth‐grade student responses were compared to those of their teachers. Student responses indicated that they had fewer inquiry‐based experiences, fewer student‐to‐student interactions, and fewer opportunities to defend their answers and justify their thinking as they moved from elementary to middle school to high school. In the elementary grades students reported an overemphasis on the use of memorization of facts and procedures and sparse use of calculators. Results were interpreted and specific directions for professional development, as reported in this paper, were drawn from these data. The paper illustrates how student surveys can inform the design of professional development experiences for the teachers in a district.     

Middle School Mathematics Teachers Learning to Teach With Calculators and Computers

This paper reports the results of a project in which experienced middle grades mathematics teachers immersed themselves in calculator and computer use for both doing and teaching mathematics and prepared themselves as leaders for communicating their knowledge to colleagues. Project evaluation included formal observation of students while they used technology in learning mathematics. Classroom observation data suggested that computers hold somewhat more attraction for students than calculators. Overall, students in all 13 classes, independent of the type of technology used, were observed to be off-task 3% of the time. These data suggested a classroom environment in which the teacher worked hard to engage students in mathematical activity. The fact that students were observed off-task so little is encouraging. The difference in off-task behaviors for calculators versus computers suggests that different technologies will indeed have different effects on students. It appears that the introduction of technologies in classrooms altered the ways teachers taught.     

A Survey of Calculator Usage in High Schools

This survey investigated the current status of calculator use in classrooms and schools. The results indicated that the prevailing policy in the sample of high schools is to allow the use of calculators during classroom learning activities and tests. Scientific calculators are more frequently used than graphing calculators in algebra I and geometry; whereas, graphing calculators are more frequently used in algebra II and precalculus/trigonometry. At the time of this survey, school policies regarding the use of graphing calculators with symbolic algebra capabilities were still not determined.     

A Study of STEM Assessments in Engineering,Science, and Mathematics for Elementary and Middle School Students

The purpose of this study was to develop, scale, and validate assessments in engineering, science, and mathematics with grade appropriate items that were sensitive to the curriculum developed by teachers. The use of item response theory to assess item functioning was a focus of the study. The work is part of a larger project focused on increasing student learning in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM)‐related areas in grades 4–8 through an engineering design‐based, integrated approach to STEM instruction and assessment. The fact that the assessments are available to school districts at no cost, and represent psychometrically sound instruments that are sensitive to STEM‐oriented curriculum, offers schools an important tool for gauging students' understanding of engineering, science, and mathematics concepts.     

Preservice teachers’ use of mathematics and science learning processes

Mathematics and science have similar learning processes (SLPs) and it has been proposed that courses focused on these and other similarities promote transfer across disciplines. However, it is not known how the use of these processes in lessons taught to children change throughout a preservice teacher education course or which are most likely to transfer within and between disciplines. Three hundred and ninety lesson plans written by 113 preservice teachers (PSTs) from 10 sections of an elementary mathematics/science methods course were analyzed. PSTs taught an eight‐lesson sequence to children: five science lessons followed by three mathematics lessons. The findings suggested that: (a) PSTs needed to only teach three mathematics lessons, after five science lessons, to reach the same number of SLPs used in the five science lessons; (b) some SLPs are highly correlated processes (HCPs) and are more likely to transfer within and between science and mathematics lessons; and (c) PSTs needed to teach no mathematics lessons, after four science lessons, to reach the same number of HCPs used in the four science lessons. Implications include centering courses on multiple and varied representations of learning processes within problem‐solving, and HCPs may be essential similarities of problem‐solving which promote transfer.     

Measurement Instruction in the Context of Scientific Investigations With Diverse Student Populations

The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of a hands‐on science curriculum, which integrates mathematics and supports English language development, on third‐grade students' mathematics achievement—specifically the measurement subscale of the statewide assessment. The data drew from a larger five‐year research and development project consisting of reform‐based science curriculum units and teacher workshops designed to promote effective science instruction while integrating mathematics and supporting English language development. The third‐grade curriculum places a strong emphasis on measurement skills in the context of science inquiry. The third‐grade students' performance on the measurement subscale of the statewide mathematics assessment in the treatment schools was compared with that of comparison schools using a hierarchical linear model. Students at the treatment schools performed significantly higher than students at the comparison schools. The results provide evidence that an integrated approach to mathematics and science instruction can benefit diverse student groups.     

Integrating Science and Mathematics: Perceptions of Preservice and Practicing Elementary Teachers

One hundred and sixty-one undergraduate elementary education majors and sixty elementary teachers completed an eight-item questionnaire designed to assess their perceptions toward integrating science and mathematics in the elementary grades. The two groups of subjects differed significantly on their responses to five of the eight items. Chi square analyses suggest that practicing elementary teachers felt they had more background in mathematics and science, were more aware of curriculum materials in this area, did not think that integration was currently a common practice, and were more likely to indicate that there was not sufficient time in the school day to integrate the subjects. Preservice teachers were more likely to indicate that integrating the disciplines was preferred to teaching them separately. In addition to the analyses of data, a list of recommendations are provided for teachers, curriculum developers, and policy makers interested in advancing the concept of integrating science and mathematics in instruction.     

The Zoo Connection: A Cooperative Project Between Formal and Informal Educational Institutions

This project was a cooperative effort between university faculty, elementary school teachers, and members of the Education Department at the Indianapolis Zoo. The purpose of this project was to develop, evaluate, and disseminate a set of fourteen K-6 science lessons that could be used in conjunction with field trips to the zoo. These lessons, titled The Zoo Connection, follow the Learning Cycle teaching model. In addition to following the model, the development of the lessons was based on the premise that teachers should focus on a specific science concept or set of related concepts when visiting a zoo. Workshop sessions were conducted to introduce teachers to the materials and to provide them with strategies for implementing the materials in their science instruction. An evaluation was conducted for each workshop session to determine teachers' perceptions of the materials and to determine whether they felt prepared to use them with their students. The materials were also field-tested in several elementary schools to assess their effectiveness for presenting science concepts to elementary school children. Results indicate that teachers felt the workshops adequately prepared them to use the materials and that the materials were effective for presenting science concepts.     

Complex calculators in the classroom: theoretical and practical reflections on teaching pre-calculus

University and older school students following scientific courses now use complex calculators with graphical, numerical and symbolic capabilities. In this context, the design of lessons for 11th grade pre-calculus students was a stimulating challenge.In the design of lessons, emphasising the role of mediation of calculators and the development of schemes of use in an 'instrumental genesis' was productive. Techniques, often discarded in teaching with technology, were viewed as a means to connect task to theories. Teaching techniques of use of a complex calculator in relation with 'traditional' techniques was considered to help students to develop instrumental and paper/pencil schemes, rich in mathematical meanings and to give sense to symbolic calculations as well as graphical and numerical approaches.The paper looks at tasks and techniques to help students to develop an appropriate instrumental genesis for algebra and functions, and to prepare for calculus. It then focuses on the potential of the calculator for connecting enactive representations and theoretical calculus. Finally, it looks at strategies to help students to experiment with symbolic concepts in calculus.This revised version was published online in September 2005 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Introducing calculus: an accumulation of teaching ideas?

The accumulation of ideas concerning the teaching of elementary calculus includes recommendations which are still not in widespread use. Research into students’ understanding of calculus suggests that there are many learning difficulties which current teaching methods are not helping students to overcome. The introduction of calculators and microcomputers to school mathematics classes provides us with the illustrative and computational power to practise methods based on practical investigation and intuition which should help to meet the needs of students beginning calculus and lead to greater understanding.     

The Effects of Non‐CAS Graphing Calculators on Student Achievement and Attitude Levels in Mathematics: A Meta‐Analysis

Forty‐two studies comparing students with access to graphing calculators during instruction to students who did not have access to graphing calculators during instruction are the subject of this meta‐analysis. The results on the achievement and attitude levels of students are presented. The studies evaluated cover middle and high school mathematics courses, as well as college courses through first semester calculus. When calculators were part of instruction but not testing, students' benefited from using calculators while developing the skills necessary to understand mathematics concepts. When calculators were included in testing and instruction, the procedural, conceptual, and overall achievement skills of students improved.     

The Graphing Calculator: A Survey of Classroom Usage

The purpose of this study was to investigate secondary mathematics teachers' use of the graphing calculator in their classrooms, The study examined whether algebra teachers are currently using this technology in their classrooms, their perceptions toward the technology, and any changes in the curriculum or instructional practices. A survey methodology was used in this study. The findings indicated that the use of the graphing calculator is still controversial to many algebra teachers. Teachers of algebra I were using graphing calculators to a significantly lesser degree than teachers of algebra H. However, modifications of the algebra curriculum are beginning to appear in classes using graphing calculators. Finally, a majority of algebra teachers responded that the graphing calculator was a motivational tool.     

The graphics calculator in mathematics education

This article covers a project conducted by the Freudenthal Institute from August 1991 to September 1994 entitled “The graphics calculator in mathematics education.” The theory of realistic mathematics education was taken as the point of departure for formulating the hypotheses. The developmental research design was used. Observation of the students' behavior during the experimental lessons supports the premise that the graphics calculator can stimulate the use of realistic contexts, the exploratory and dynamic approach to mathematics, a more integrated view of mathematics, and a more flexible behavior in problem solving.