Field air analysis with SPME device

Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) devices were used for a wide scope of air-monitoring including field sampling and analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), formaldehyde, and particulate matter (PM) in air. Grab (instantaneous) and time-weighted average (TWA) sampling were accomplished using exposed and retracted SPME fibers, respectively. Sampling time varied from 1 to 75 min, followed by analysis with a gas chromatograph (GC). A portable GC equipped with unique, in-series detectors: photoionization (PID), flame ionization (FID), and dry electrolytic conductivity (DELCD), provided almost real-time analysis and speciation for common VOCs during an indoor air quality surveys. Indoor air samples collected with SPME devices were compared with those collected using conventional National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) methods. Air concentrations measured with the SPME device were as low as 700 parts-per-trillion (ppt) for semi-volatile organic compounds. SPME methodology proved to be more sensitive than conventional methods, and provided a simple approach for fast, cost-effective sampling and analysis of common VOCs in indoor air. SPME technology combined with fast portable GC reduced the sampling and analysis time to less than 15 min. The configuration offered the conveniences of immediate on-site monitoring and decision making, that are not possible with conventional methods. In addition, SPME fibers were applied to sampling of particulate matter in diesel engine exhaust. Linear uptake and particulate build-up on the fiber were observed. Preliminary research suggests that SPME fibers could also be applied to sampling of airborne particulate matter.     

固相微萃取-气相色谱/质谱分析栀子花的头香成分

 分别用固相微萃取和动态顶空法分离栀子鲜花的头香成分,用GC/MS技术分析鉴定,并用GC/MS总离子流色谱峰的峰面积进行归一化定量。在固相微萃取方法中,共鉴定了54种化学成分,占总峰面积的99.98%。主要成分(质量分数)依次为金合欢烯（64.86%）、罗勒烯（29.33%）、芳樟醇（2.74%）、惕各酸顺式叶醇酯（1.34%）和苯甲酸甲酯（0.25%）等。经与动态顶空法的分析结果比较发现,固相微萃取法不仅操作简便,而且具有较高的采样灵敏度,获得的化学成分的信息量多于动态顶空法。     

Comparison of solid-phase microextraction, supercritical fluid extraction, steam distillation, and solvent extraction techniques for analysis of volatile consituents in Fructus Amomi

Four sampling techniques, solid-phase microextraction (SPME), supercritical fluid extraction (SFE), steam distillation (SD), and solvent extraction (SE), were compared for the analysis of volatile constituents from a traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) of the dried ripe fruit of Fructus Amomi (Sha Ren). A total of 38 compounds were identified by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Different SFE and SPME parameters (modifier content, extraction pressure, and temperature for SFE and fibers, extraction temperature, and time for SPME) were studied. The results by SFE and SPME were compared with those obtained by conventional SD and SE methods. The results showed that SFE and SPME are better sample preparation techniques than SD and SE. Due to SFE's requirement for expensive specialized instrumentation, the simplicity, low cost, and speed of SPME make it a more appropriate technique for extraction of volatile constituents in TCMs.     

Determination of chemical warfare agents and related compounds in environmental samples by solid-phase microextraction with gas chromatography

Solid phase microextraction (SPME) is an increasingly common method of sample isolation and enhancement. SPME is a convenient and simple sample preparation technique for chromatographic analysis and a useful alternative to liquid-liquid extraction and solid phase extraction. SPME is speed and simply method, which has been widely used in environmental analysis because it is a rather safe method when dealing with highly toxic chemicals. A combination of SPME and gas chromatography (GC) permits both the qualitative and quantitative analysis of toxic industrial compounds, pesticides and chemical warfare agents (CWAs), including their degradation products, in air, water and soil samples. This work presents a combination of SPME and GC methods with various types of detectors in the analysis of CWAs and their degradation products in air, water, soil and other matrices. The combination of SPME and GC methods allows for low detection limits depending on the analyte, matrix and detection system. Commercially available fibers have been mainly used to extract CWAs in headspace analysis. However, attempts have been made to introduce new fiber coatings that are characterized by higher selectivities towards different analytes of interest. Environmental decomposition of CWAs leads to the formation of more hydrophilic products. These compounds may be isolated from samples using SPME and analyzed using GC however, they must often be derivatized first to produce good chromatography. In these cases, one must ensure that the SPME method also meets the same needs. Otherwise, it is helpful to use derivatization methods. SPME may also be used with fieldportable mass spectrometry (MS) and GC-MS instruments for chemical defense applications, including field sampling and analysis. SPME fibers can be taken into contaminated areas to directly sample air, headspaces above solutions, soils and water.     

Selected ion storage versus tandem MS/MS for organochlorine pesticides determination in drinking waters with SPME and GC-MS

The use of two modes for mass spectrometry (MS) detection with an ion trap instrument, selected ion storage (SIS) and tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS), are compared for the solid-phase microextraction (SPME)–gas chromatography (GC) coupled to mass spectrometry (GC-MS) determination of 16 priority organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) in drinking water samples at the ultratrace levels (ng?L^?1) required by official guidelines in the European legislation. Experimental parameters investigated for the SPME sample preparation were: the type of coating (100?µm polydimethylsiloxane, PDMS, and 65?µm poly(dimethylsiloxane)–divinylbenzene, PDMS/DVB), SPME modality, extraction and desorption times and desorption temperature and the methanol percentage in the SPME working solution. Under the calculated optimal conditions two methodologies were developed, one for SIS and the other for MS/MS modes. The detection limits, precision and accuracy were evaluated for both alternatives and were appropriate to the official guidelines requirements. The SPME–GC-MS(SIS) methodology offered LODs from 0.2–6.6?ng?L^?1, precision below 13% and recoveries between 83 and 110%. The SPME–GC–MS/MS methodology provided limits of detection (LODs) ranging from 0.3 to 7.6 ng?L^?1, % RSD were ≤14% and recoveries of 79–108% were achieved. After the results observed within an Interlaboratory Exercise, the latest MS methodology was selected for the pursued analysis in real drinking water samples. Also, the good results in this round-robin exercise validate the proposed SPME–GC–MS/MS methodology.     

Solid phase microextraction and gas chromatography mass spectrometry analysis of Zingiber officinale and Curcuma longa

SPME analysis of Zingiber officinale Roscoe and Curcuma longa L. were performed by using a DVB/CARB/PDMS fiber. The SPME analysis of Zingiber officinale showed that the main components found were camphene (7.27%), geranial (8.37%), α-zingiberene (14.50%), α-farnesene (9.14%), β-bisabolene (6.52%), and β-sesquiphellandrene (9.92%). The SPME analysis of Curcuma longa showed that main components were p-cymene (12.96%) and ar-turmerone (12.08%). Other components were β-phellandrene (7.86%), terpinolene (6.97%), ar-curcumene (8.53%), α-zingiberene (8.46%), and β-sesquiphellandrene (7.37%).     

气质联用仪分析烟用香精的几种方法比较

烟用香精香料是卷烟生产不可缺少的原料,烟用香精香料技术是烟草行业的重要核心技术之一,卷烟品牌的树立与发展密切相关,因此对烟用香精香料的化学组成进行准确的定性和定量分析具有非常重要的意义[1]。烟用香精香料的常规检测可参考国家烟草行业标准[2]。由于感官检验人为的不     

Applications of solid-phase microextraction in food analysis

Food analysis is important for the evaluation of the nutritional value and quality of fresh and processed products, and for monitoring food additives and other toxic contaminants. Sample preparation, such as extraction, concentration and isolation of analytes, greatly influences the reliable and accurate analysis of food. Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) is a new sample preparation technique using a fused-silica fiber that is coated on the outside with an appropriate stationary phase. Analyte in the sample is directly extracted to the fiber coating. The SPME technique can be used routinely in combination with gas chromatography (GC), GC–mass spectrometry (GC–MS), high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) or LC–MS. Furthermore, another SPME technique known as in-tube SPME has also been developed for combination with LC or LC–MS using an open tubular fused-silica capillary column as an SPME device instead of SPME fiber. These methods using SPME techniques save preparation time, solvent purchase and disposal costs, and can improve the detection limits. This review summarizes the SPME techniques for coupling with various analytical instruments and the applications of these techniques to food analysis.     

Comparison of membrane assisted solvent extraction,stir bar sorptive extraction,and solid phase microextraction in analysis of tetramine in food

Three environmentally friendly extraction techniques, membrane assisted solvent extraction (MASE), stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE), and headspace solid phase microextraction (HS‐SPME), were compared for the direct analysis of the highly toxic rodenticide tetramine in food. The optimized MASE method was applied to seven foods fortified with tetramine and compared to previously reported SBSE and HS‐SPME results. Parameters such as the standard addition linearity (MASE (0.964–0.999), SBSE (0.966–0.999), HS‐SPME (0.955–0.999)), recovery (MASE (12–86%), SBSE (36–130%), HS‐SPME (50–200%)), reproducibility (MASE (3.0–30%), SBSE (4.4–9.6%), HS‐SPME (1–12%)), and LOD (MASE (1.6–6.4 ng/g), SBSE (0.2–2.1 ng/g), HS‐SPME (0.9–4.3 ng/g)) were compared.     

Application of high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet diode array detection and refractive index detection to the determination of class composition and to the analysis of gasoline

Two approaches based on sorptive extraction, solid-phase microextraction (SPME) and stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE), in combination with liquid chromatography (LC)-atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometry (MS) have been assayed for analyzing chlorpyriphos methyl, diazinon, fonofos, phenthoate, phosalone, and pirimiphos ethyl in honey. In both, SPME and SBSE, enrichment was performed using a poly(dimethylsiloxane) coating. Significant parameters affecting sorption process such as sample volume, sorption and desorption times, ionic strength, elution solvent, and dilution (water/honey) proportion were optimized and discussed. Performance of both methods has been compared through the determination of linearity, extraction efficiencies, and limits of quantification. Relative standard deviations for the studied compounds were from 3 to 10% by SPME and from 5 to 9% by SBSE. Both methods were linear in a range of at least two orders of magnitude, and the limits of quantification reached ranging from 0.04 to 0.4 mg kg(-1) by SBSE, and from 0.8 to 2 mg kg(-1) by SPME. The two procedures were applied for analyzing 15 commercial honeys of different botanical origin. SPME and SBSE in combination with LC-MS enabled a rapid and simple determination of organophosphorus pesticides in honey. SBSE showed higher concentration capability (large quantities of sample can be handled) and greater accuracy (between 5 and 20 times) and sensitivity (between 10 and 50 times) than SPME: thus, under equal conditions, SBSE is the recommended technique for pesticide analysis in honey.     

Optimisation of a headspace solid-phase microextraction with on-fiber derivatisation method for the direct determination of haloanisoles and halophenols in wine

A solid-phase microextraction (SPME) procedure for the determination of four haloanisoles (2,4,6-trichloroanisole, 2,3,4,6-tetrachloroanisole, pentachloroanisole and 2,4,6-tribromoanisole), as well as their precursor halophenols (2,4,6-trichlorophenol, 2,3,4,6-tetrachlorophenol, pentachlorophenol and 2,4,6-tribromophenol), involved in the presence of cork taint in wine, was developed. Firstly, analytes were concentrated on a SPME fiber, and then halophenols were derivatised using N-methyl-N-trimethylsilyltrifluoroacetamide (MSTFA). The compounds were desorbed for 5 min in the gas chromatography injector port and then determined with an electron capture detector. The influence of different parameters on the efficiency of extraction (volume of sample, type of fibre coating and time) and derivatisation (time, temperature and volume of MSTFA) steps was evaluated. Polyacrylate (PA) was selected as the extraction fiber, optimised parameters for SPME were 10 ml of wine, temperature 70 degrees C and extraction time 60 min. The optimal conditions identified for the derivatisation step were temperature 25 degrees C, reagent volume 50 microl and extraction time 25 min. Under optimal conditions, the proposed method showed satisfactory linearity, precision and detection limits. The method was applied successfully to the analysis of red wine samples. To our knowledge, this is the first time that headspace (HS) SPME combined with on-fiber derivatisation has been applied to determine cork taint responsible compounds in wine.     

Comparison of solid phase microextraction and hollow fiber liquid phase microextraction for the determination of pesticides in aqueous samples by gas chromatography triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometry

This work compares two miniaturised sample preparation methods, solid phase microextraction (SPME) and hollow fiber liquid phase microextraction (HF-LPME), in combination with gas chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry with a triple quadrupole analyzer for the determination of 77 pesticides in drinking water. In the case of SPME, extraction temperature and time were optimized by experimental design, although other parameters, as desorption time, pH, and ionic strength, were also evaluated. The extraction and desorption solvents [octanol/dihexyl ether (75:25, v/v) and cyclohexane, respectively], as well as the extraction and desorption time, ionic strength, and pH, were studied for the HF-LPME procedure. Under the optimal conditions, recoveries (70.2–113.5% for SPME and 70.0–119.5% for HF-LPME), intra-day precision (2.1–19.4% for SPME and 4.3–22.5% for HF-LPME), inter-day precision (5.2–21.5% for SPME and 8.4–27.3% for HF-LPME), and limits of detection, between 0.1 and 28.8 ng/L for SPME and 0.2 and 47.1 ng/L for HF-LPME and overall uncertainty (9.6–25.2% for SPME and 13.3–27.5% for HF-LPME) were established for both extraction procedures. Finally, the proposed methods were successfully applied to the analysis of 41 drinking water samples, and similar results were obtained with both extraction approaches.     

A comparison of results obtained using liquid injection and headspace solid-phase microextraction for crude oil analysis by GC with mass spectrometer detection

Gas chromatographic (GC) analysis in solution and head space solid-phase microextraction (SPME)-GC analysis of a sample of crude oil gave different results. The SPME technique allowed the identification of a larger number of components than by using usual GC-mass spectrometry (MS). The method failed within the range of C14-C25 where GC-MS in solution allowed to obtain more representative results; on the contrary, SPME allowed to obtain data on the presence of volatile compounds that can not be identified in GC-MS analysis in solution. Furthermore, in the range C8-C12, SPME allowed to identify approximately 30 compounds not shown in the GC-MS analysis in solution. SPME analysis showed the presence of some alkenes not identified in GC-MS analysis in solution. SPME-GC-MS can be used in the analysis of crude oil in contaminated soil.     

Comparative analysis of volatile compounds of ‘fino’ sherry wine by rotatory and continuous liquid-liquid extraction and solid-phase microextraction in conjunction with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry

Different headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) methods have been selected and applied to the analysis of volatile compounds in ‘fino’ sherry wine by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. A method based on rotary and continuous liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) for analysis of these same compounds has been optimised. The best conditions to extract this type of compounds using SPME and LLE were determined and both methods were validated. Both methodologies show adequate detection and quantitation limits, and linear ranges for correctly analysing these compounds. The recoveries obtained were close to 100%, with good repeatability values. The analytical and procedural advantages and disadvantages of these two methods have been compared. In general, SPME presented higher sensitivities. Both analytical methods were used to analyse five samples of ‘fino’ sherry wine supplied by different producers. No significant differences were found between the techniques at a significance level of 5%. The regression coefficients (r²) for analysis using LLE and SPME exceeded 0.94 for all compounds. The LLE procedure is a method with high repeatability and has the possibility of simultaneous extraction of several samples (up to 12), however the SPME technique is a solvent-free method presenting major advantages, such as small sample volume and higher sensitivity and simplicity.     

Solid-phase microextraction of polychlorinated biphenyls

The extraction and analysis of 21 polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) ranging from di- to decachlorobiphenyls in ocean, wetland and leachate water samples were achieved using solid-phase microextraction (SPME) with a 100-μm poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) fiber and gas chromatography–electron-capture detection (GC–ECD). Severe carryover between samples (e.g., 20%) occurs on both stir bars and the SPME fibers demonstrating that it is important to use a new stir bar for each sample, as well as to perform SPME–GC blanks between samples to avoid quantitative errors. The equilibrium partitioning coefficients of individual PCB congeners between PDMS and water were found to be surprisingly different compared to their octanol–water partitioning coefficient (K_ow), demonstrating that K_ow cannot be used to estimate the partitioning behavior of PCBs in the SPME process. Using a 15-min SPME extraction, SPME analysis with GC–ECD was linear (r²≥0.97) from 5 pg/ml to the solubility limit of each congener. Concentrations in water samples obtained by 15-min SPME extractions compared favorably with those obtained by toluene extractions, demonstrating that SPME combined with GC is a useful technique for the rapid determination of PCBs in water samples.     

Coupling of solid-phase microextraction continuous bed (monolithic) capillaries with capillary zone electrophoresis for direct analysis of drugs in biological fluids

Hyperlink robust biocompatible solid-phase microextraction (SPME) devices were prepared using continuous bed (monolithic) restricted-access media (RAM) as the SPME capillary insert. The RAM-based SPME approach was able to simultaneously separate proteins from a biological sample, while directly extracting the active components of caffeine, paracetamol and acetylsalicylic acid from the drug NeoCitramonum. The devices were interfaced with a CZE system and fully automated analysis for sample preconcentration, desorption, separation and quantification of analytes was evaluated. Comparative study of in-line coupled SPME-CZE using RAM and RP capillary inserts was carried out. Using an SPME (RAM) insert, the calculated caffeine, paracetamol and acetylsalicylic acid LODs in a bovine plasma sample were 0.3, 0.8 and 1.9 ng/mL, respectively.     

Analysis of some pesticides in water samples using solid-phase microextraction-gas chromatography with different mass spectrometric techniques

A solid-phase microextraction (SPME)-GC procedure has been developed for the analysis of four selected pesticides (propanil, acetochlor, myclobutanil and fenoxycarb) in water samples. Mass spectrometry (MS) was used and two different instruments, a quadrupole MS system and an ion trap operating in the MS-MS mode, were compared. A Carbowax-divinylbenzene SPME fiber was used. The performances of the two GC-MS instruments were comparable in terms of linearity (in the range of 0.1-10 microg/l in water samples) and sensitivity (limits of detection were in the low ng/l range); the quadrupole MS instrument gave better precision than the ion trap MS-MS system, but generally the relative standard deviations for replicates were acceptable for both instruments (<15%). Specificity with these two instruments was comparable in the analysis of ground water samples. Recovery tests were made to assess the applicability of the SPME procedure in the quantitative analysis of contaminated groundwaters.     

Determination of stimulants in human urine and hair samples by polypyrrole coated capillary in-tube solid phase microextraction coupled with liquid chromatography-electrospray mass spectrometry

A simple and sensitive method for the determination of amphetamine, methamphetamine and their methylenedioxy derivatives in urine and hair samples was developed by coupling automated in-tube solid phase microextraction (SPME) to high performance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (HPLC-ES-MS). To achieve optimum performance, the conditions for both the in-tube SPME and the ES-MS detection were investigated. ES-MS detection conditions were studied by flow injection analysis (FIA) with direct liquid injection. In-tube SPME conditions were optimized by selecting the appropriate extraction parameters, including capillary stationary phases and sample pH. For the compounds studied, a custom-made polypyrrole (PPY) coated capillary showed superior extraction efficiency as compared to commercial capillaries. Therefore, the PPY coated capillary was selected for in-tube SPME in this study. The calibration curves of stimulants were linear in the range from 0.1 to 100 ng ml(-1) with detection limits (S/N=3) of 8-56 ng l(-1). This method was successfully applied to the analysis of the stimulants in spiked human urine and hair samples.     

Solid-phase microextraction coupled with microcolumn liquid chromatography for the analysis of amitriptyline in human urine

Summary Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) is a solvent-free sample-preparation technique that enables isolation and pre-concentration of analytes from a sample on a thin film coating a fused-silica fiber. In this study SPME coupled with microcolumn liquid chromatography (micro LC) has been used for the determination of four tricyclic antidepressants (amitriptyline, imipramine, nortriptyline, and desipramine) in human urine. SPME conditions which affect extraction efficiency were optimized, and under the optimum conditions the system was a few hundred times more sensitive than direct LC analysis without SPME. For amitriptyline the detection limit was 3 ng mL⁻¹ and the calibration curve was linear in the range of 5–500 ng mL⁻¹. The SPME-micro LC method has been applied to the analysis of amitriptyline in patient’s urine.     

Use of SPME extraction to determine organophosphorus pesticides adsorption phenomena in water and soil matrices

Solid-phase micro extraction (SPME) coupled with GC enables rapid and simple analysis of organophosphorus pesticides in a range of complex matrices. Investigations were made into the extraction efficiencies from water of six organophosphorus insecticides (methamidophos, omethoate, dimethoate, parathion methyl, malathion, and parathion ethyl) showing a wide range of polarities. Three SPME fibres coated with different stationary phases, polydimethylsiloxane, polyacrylate, and carbowax-divinylbenzene (CW-DVB), were investigated. Water was spiked with the pesticides at concentrations from 1 to 0.01 µg mL-1, and the solutions used for optimization of the procedure. The CW-DVB fibre, with a 65 µm coating, gave the best performance. The optimized experimental conditions were sample volume 10 mL at 20°C, equilibration time 16 min, pH 5, and presence of 10% w/v NaCl. SPME analyses were performed on solutions obtained by equilibrating aqueous pesticide solutions with six certified soils with various physico-chemical characteristics. SPME data were also assessed by comparison with analyses performed by using conventional solid-phase extraction. Results indicate the suitability of SPME for analysis of pesticides in environmental water samples.