Individual differences in the masking level difference with a narrowband masker at 500 or 2000 Hz

The masking level difference (MLD) for a narrowband noise masker is associated with marked individual differences. This pair of studies examines factors that might account for these individual differences. Experiment 1 estimated the MLD for a 50 Hz wide band of masking noise centered at 500 or 2000 Hz, gated on for 400 ms. Tonal signals were either brief (15 ms) or long (200 ms), and brief signals were coincident with either a dip or peak in the masker envelope. Experiment 2 estimated the MLD for both signal and masker consisting of a 50 Hz wide bandpass noise centered on 500 Hz. Signals were generated to provide only interaural phase cues, only interaural level cues, or both. The pattern of individual differences was dominated by variability in NoSpi thresholds, and NoSpi thresholds were highly correlated across all conditions. Results suggest that the individual differences observed in Experiment 1 were not primarily driven by differences in the use of binaural fine structure cues or in binaural temporal resolution. The range of thresholds obtained for a brief NoSpi tonal signal at 500 Hz was consistent with a model based on normalized interaural correlation. This model was not consistent for analogous conditions at 2000 Hz.     

The masking-level difference and overall masker level: restating the internal noise hypothesis

Recent investigations of the masking-level difference (MLD) have often involved measurement of the MLD as a function of masker level. The results show, as had earlier work, that the size of the MLD decreases as the masker level decreases. These studies have usually not considered an earlier explanation of the dependency of the MLD on masker level, that is, that additive internal noise, which is partially interaurally uncorrelated, leads to decorrelated maskers at low levels of the external masking noise. Because maskers that are decorrelated yield small MLDs, the MLD is likewise small at low masker levels. This review article shows that this explanation provides a good fit to data obtained over the past four decades. It also shows that the MLD depends less on masker level with insert phones than with supraaural phones as would be predicted by the additive internal noise explanation and the observation of lower internal noise with the use of insert phones. It is concluded that the internal noise explanation should be considered when the MLD is measured as a function of masker level.     

Effects of temporal separation and masker level on binaural analysis in forward masking.

In the present study detection under diotic (NoSo) and dichotic (NoS pi) listening conditions in a forward masking paradigm was investigated. Both the level of a noise masker and the temporal separation between the masker and a 250-Hz tone burst served as independent variables. Results showed that most of the variance in the data could be accounted for by the amount of masking in the NoSo condition, independent of the value of the temporal parameter, which itself accounted for only 1.4% of the variance that remained. Once the data were corrected for NoSo masking effectiveness, the MLD was found to decrease by only 1.4 dB as temporal separation increased from 5-100 ms, which is consistent with a very long time constant for the binaural system. Consistent with this finding, it was shown that slope changes of the growth of masking functions, for simultaneous as compared to forward masking, were similar for both the NoSo and NoS pi conditions.     

Effects of non-simultaneous masking on the binaural masking level difference

The present study sought to clarify the role of non-simultaneous masking in the binaural masking level difference for maskers that fluctuate in level. In the first experiment the signal was a brief 500-Hz tone, and the masker was a bandpass noise (100-2000 Hz), with the initial and final 200-ms bursts presented at 40-dB spectrum level and the inter-burst gap presented at 20-dB spectrum level. Temporal windows were fitted to thresholds measured for a range of gap durations and signal positions within the gap. In the second experiment, individual differences in out of phase (NoSπ) thresholds were compared for a brief signal in a gapped bandpass masker, a brief signal in a steady bandpass masker, and a long signal in a narrowband (50-Hz-wide) noise masker. The third experiment measured brief tone detection thresholds in forward, simultaneous, and backward masking conditions for a 50- and for a 1900-Hz-wide noise masker centered on the 500-Hz signal frequency. Results are consistent with comparable temporal resolution in the in phase (NoSo) and NoSπ conditions and no effect of temporal resolution on individual observers' ability to utilize binaural cues in narrowband noise. The large masking release observed for a narrowband noise masker may be due to binaural masking release from non-simultaneous, informational masking.     

A masking level difference due to harmonicity

The role of harmonicity in masking was studied by comparing the effect of harmonic and inharmonic maskers on the masked thresholds of noise probes using a three-alternative, forced-choice method. Harmonic maskers were created by selecting sets of partials from a harmonic series with an 88-Hz fundamental and 45 consecutive partials. Inharmonic maskers differed in that the partial frequencies were perturbed to nearby values that were not integer multiples of the fundamental frequency. Average simultaneous-masked thresholds were as much as 10 dB lower with the harmonic masker than with the inharmonic masker, and this difference was unaffected by masker level. It was reduced or eliminated when the harmonic partials were separated by more than 176 Hz, suggesting that the effect is related to the extent to which the harmonics are resolved by auditory filters. The threshold difference was not observed in a forward-masking experiment. Finally, an across-channel mechanism was implicated when the threshold difference was found between a harmonic masker flanked by harmonic bands and a harmonic masker flanked by inharmonic bands. A model developed to explain the observed difference recognizes that an auditory filter output envelope is modulated when the filter passes two or more sinusoids, and that the modulation rate depends on the differences among the input frequencies. For a harmonic masker, the frequency differences of adjacent partials are identical, and all auditory filters have the same dominant modulation rate. For an inharmonic masker, however, the frequency differences are not constant and the envelope modulation rate varies across filters. The model proposes that a lower variability facilitates detection of a probe-induced change in the variability, thus accounting for the masked threshold difference. The model was supported by significantly improved predictions of observed thresholds when the predictor variables included envelope modulation rate variance measured using simulated auditory filters.     

The effect of masker spectral asymmetry on overshoot in simultaneous masking

"Overshoot" is a simultaneous masking phenomenon: Thresholds for short high-frequency tone bursts presented shortly after the onset of a broadband masker are raised compared to thresholds in the presence of a continuous masker. Overshoot for 2-ms bursts of a 5000-Hz test tone is described for four subjects as a function of the spectral composition and level of the masker. First, it was verified that overshoot is largely independent of masker duration. Second, overshoot was determined for a variety of 10-ms masker bursts composed of differently filtered uniform masking noise with an overall level of 60 dB SPL: unfiltered, high-pass (cutoff at 3700 Hz), low-pass (cutoff at 5700 Hz), and third-octave-band-(centered at 5000 Hz) filtered uniform masking noises presented separately or combined with different bandpass maskers (5700-16000 Hz, 5700-9500 Hz, 8400-16000 Hz) were used. Third, masked thresholds were measured for maskers composed of an upper or lower octave band adjacent to the third-octave-band masker as a function of the level of the octave band. All maskers containing components above the critical band of the test tone led to overshoot; no additional overshoot was produced by masker components below it. Typical values of overshoot were on the order of 12 dB. Overshoot saturated when masker levels were above 60 dB SPL for the upper octave-band masker. The standard neurophysiological explanation of overshoot accounts only partially for these data. Details that must be accommodated by any full explanation of overshoot are discussed.     

Upward shifts in the masking pattern with increasing masker intensity

Masking patterns obtained with forward-masking paradigms and relatively intense maskers sometimes have their peaks at the masker frequency and sometimes at a frequency well above it. Here it is shown that which outcome is obtained depends upon certain temporal parameters of the procedure. Specifically, the masking pattern for a 2000-Hz tone showed a gradual shift toward higher frequencies as masker intensity was increased from 65 to 95 dB SPL when long signals (about 50 ms) and long masker-to-signal intervals (about 50 ms) were used, but the effect was absent or smaller when the signals and intervals were short. This shift did not occur with a 750-Hz masker. Upward shifts in the masking pattern with increasing masker intensity are in accord with the view that the peak of displacement of the traveling-wave envelope migrates basally with increasing intensity--an idea that has frequently been suggested as an explanation of the so-called half-octave shift so routinely seen in auditory fatigue experiments.     

Effect of signal phase and masker separation on two-tone masking

The detectability of a sinusoid masked by two sinusoids was studied as a function of signal phase and the frequency separation between the two maskers. The signal frequency fs was equal to the arithmetic mean of the two masker frequencies, fl and fh, where fl less than fh. Signal frequencies of 1 and 4 kHz, eight signal phases, and 12 values of r = (fh-fl)/fs from 0.01-1.0 were used. The data could be divided into three regions. For large masker separations, r greater than 0.4, no consistent effects of signal phase were observed. For r less than 0.4, an effect of signal phase was evident at both signal frequencies. However, the effect of signal phase was different for the two regions 0.03 less than r less than 0.4 and r less than 0.03. For moderate masker separations, 0.03 less than r less than 0.4, masked thresholds were lowest at phases of 0 degrees and 180 degrees and highest at phases of 90 degrees and 270 degrees. For small masker separations, r less than 0.03, masked threshold was highest at 0 degree and the effect of signal phase depended on signal frequency. The different form of the phase effect for these three regions is discussed in terms of the use of different cues, arising from temporal resolution, spectral filtering, combination tones, and envelope spectra.     

Temporal structure model of binaural masking level difference.

It is shown that a simple cross-correlation model is not adequate to explain both binaural masking level difference (MLD) and spatial selective attention. The reason is that for a low-intensity signal in NoS(pi) condition the maximal activity in the binaural analyzer as a function of interaural delay in single spectral channel is independent of signal intensity. On the other hand, if detection ability is associated with the isolation of tonically firing units, MLD is simply explained as the increase in firing synchronization as a function of the signal's interaural phase difference (IPD). Quantitatively results are presented based on numerical solutions of the model.     

Temporal effects in simultaneous masking with on- and off-frequency noise maskers: effects of signal frequency and masker level

Temporal effects in simultaneous masking were measured as a function of masker level for an on-frequency broadband masker and an off-frequency narrow-band masker for signal frequencies of 750, 1730, and 4000 Hz. The on-frequency masker was 10 equivalent rectangular bandwidths (ERBs) wide and centered at the signal frequency; the off-frequency masker was 500 Hz wide and its lower frequency edge was 1.038 ERBs higher in frequency than the signal. The primary goal of the study was to determine whether previously observed differences regarding the effects of signal frequency and masker level on the temporal effect for these two different types of masker might be due to considerably different signal levels at threshold. Despite similar masked thresholds, the effects of signal frequency and masker level in the present study were different for the two masker types. The temporal effect was significant for the two highest frequencies and absent for the lowest frequency in the presence of the broadband masker, but was more or less independent of frequency for the narrow-band masker. The temporal effect increased but then decreased as a function of level for the broadband masker (at the two higher signal frequencies, where there was a temporal effect), but increased and reached an asymptote for the narrow-band masker. Despite the different effects of signal frequency and masker level, the temporal effects for both types of masker can be understood in terms of a basilar-membrane input-output function that becomes more linear during the course of masker stimulation.     

Physiological studies of central masking in man. II: Tonepip SSRs and the masking level difference.

The auditory steady-state response (SSR), an evoked response generated in the auditory cortex, was initiated by monaural trains of 500-Hz tonepips repeated at rates near 40 Hz while wideband noise was being delivered to the same or opposite ear. Contralateral noise reduced SSR amplitudes in an intensity-dependent manner, whereas ipsilateral noise enhanced the SSR amplitudes at low levels and depressed them at high levels. Systematic phase changes accompanied the amplitude changes. These results, obtained with tonepips, closely resemble those previously reported for clicks. A third experiment, a masking level difference (MLD) experiment, examined changes in the SSR measures during four successive tonepip-plus-noise conditions: (1) monaural tonepips alone; (2) adding ipsilateral noise; (3) then adding contralateral noise; (4) finally, adding contralateral tonepips. The SSR amplitude changes measured in the experiment did not always correspond with the changes in perception reported by the subject.     

The effect of masker level uncertainty on intensity discrimination

Thresholds were measured for detection of an increment in level of a 60-dB SPL target tone at 1 kHz, either in quiet or in the presence of maskers at 0.5 and 2 kHz. Interval-by-interval level rove applied independently to remote masker tones substantially elevated thresholds compared to intensity discrimination in quiet, an effect on the order of 10+dB [10 log(DeltaII)]. Asynchronous onset and stimulus envelope mismatches across frequency reduced but did not eliminate masking. A preinterval cue to signal frequency had no effect, but cuing masker frequency reduced thresholds, whether or not masker level was also cued. About 1 to 2 dB of threshold elevation in these conditions can be attributed to energetic masking. Decreasing the overall presentation level and increasing masker separation essentially eliminates energetic masking; under these conditions masker level rove elevates thresholds by approximately 7 dB when the target and masker tones are gated synchronously. This masking persists even when the flanking masker tones are presented contralateral to the target. Results suggest that observers tend to listen synthetically, even in conditions when this strategy reduces sensitivity to the intensity increment.     

Detection of multicomponent signals: effect of difference in level between components

The detection of multicomponent signals for which the components are not equidetectable is precisely investigated as a function of the level difference ΔL(i∕j) between components. The detection thresholds are determined for a seven-tone complex signal with random starting phases masked by white noise. Level differences between the components are examined. A model for non-equidetectable conditions based on the statistical summation model is described. The improvement in detection is calculated from the level difference between components that is related to the thresholds for single components. The model predictions are in accordance with the experimental results.     

Resonance minima and maxima in the diffraction intensities of atomic beams from solid surfaces

Resonance minima and maxima in the diffraction intensities of atomic beams from solid surfaces are explained by generalizing the Laue diffraction equation to include the effects of the atom-phonon interactions on the diffracted waves exactly.     

Comodulation masking release and the masking-level difference

An experiment was performed to determine if the mechanism that mediates comodulation masking release (CMR) is associated with that used to improve detection by the masking-level difference (MLD). The experiment consisted of first improving detectability of a masked diotic tone burst by adding a synchronous noise band at another frequency region (CMR), and then measuring an MLD in the usual manner, by inverting the tone-burst signal to one ear. Results indicate that a substantial MLD can be measured for a signal whose detectability has already been improved by CMR. However, that MLD (9 dB) is smaller than that measured in random noise (14 dB). Put another way, a small CMR (4 dB) can be produced even when the detectability of a stimulus has already been improved due to the MLD. These data are in general agreement with those of Hall et al. [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 83, 1839-1845 (1988)] and Schooneveldt and Moore [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 85, 262-272 (1989)].     

Effects of masker waveform and signal-to-masker phase relation on diotic and dichotic masking by reproducible noise

The proportions of hits and false alarms were estimated for the detection of a 500-Hz sinusoidal signal in each of 25, reproducible samples of wideband, white, Gaussian noise. The effects of signal phase were investigated under diotic (MoSo) and dichotic (MoS pi) conditions and compared to the predictions of two major models of binaural hearing. Averaging the data over samples obscured important across-sample and across-subject differences in performance. The proportions of hits and false alarms for individual noise samples presented under the MoSo condition were highly correlated with those for the same noise samples under the dichotic MoS pi condition, suggesting that the cues determining performance under these conditions are related. Signal-to-masker phase had a large effect on the proportion of hits under the MoSo condition, but only a small effect under the MoS pi condition. The Vector model predicts a large effect of signal phase under the MoS pi condition, and is, therefore, imcompatible with this aspect of the data. The expected value of the decision variable of the EC model is independent of signal phase. However, when the variance of the decision variable is also considered, the EC model does predict changes in the proportion of hits with the phase of the signal, comparable to those observed here. Further, it was shown that, if minor changes in the form of the EC model's decision variable or in the distribution of the internal noise parameters are assumed, the expected value of the decision variable also changes with the phase of the signal.     

Effect of masker type and age on speech intelligibility and spatial release from masking in children and adults

Speech recognition in noisy environments improves when the speech signal is spatially separated from the interfering sound. This effect, known as spatial release from masking (SRM), was recently shown in young children. The present study compared SRM in children of ages 5-7 with adults for interferers introducing energetic, informational, and/or linguistic components. Three types of interferers were used: speech, reversed speech, and modulated white noise. Two female voices with different long-term spectra were also used. Speech reception thresholds (SRTs) were compared for: Quiet (target 0 degrees front, no interferer), Front (target and interferer both 0 degrees front), and Right (interferer 90 degrees right, target 0 degrees front). Children had higher SRTs and greater masking than adults. When spatial cues were not available, adults, but not children, were able to use differences in interferer type to separate the target from the interferer. Both children and adults showed SRM. Children, unlike adults, demonstrated large amounts of SRM for a time-reversed speech interferer. In conclusion, masking and SRM vary with the type of interfering sound, and this variation interacts with age; SRM may not depend on the spectral peculiarities of a particular type of voice when the target speech and interfering speech are different sex talkers.     

Within-channel cues to comodulation masking release for single and symmetrically placed pairs of flanking bands

Comodulation masking release (CMR) as measured in a flanking-band (FB) paradigm is often larger when the FBs are close to the signal frequency, f(s), than when they are remote from f(s), an effect which may be partly due to the use of within-channel cues. Schooneveldt and Moore [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 85, 262-272 (1989)] reported that, for f(s) = 1000 Hz, this effect was larger when a single FB was used than when there were two FBs symmetrically placed about f(s), and proposed that there are within-channel cues that are available for a single FB, but not for a symmetrically placed pair of FBs. The present study replicated and extended their study. Although CMR was larger for two symmetrically placed FBs than for a single FB, the effect of FB proximity to f(s) did not differ for the two cases. The results do not support the idea that there are additional within-channel cues that are available for a single FB. Changes in the regularity of temporal fine structure and changes in the prevalence of low-amplitude envelope portions are both plausible within-channel cues.