The efficiency of public and publicly subsidized high schools in Spain: Evidence from PISA-2006

This paper compares the efficiency of Spanish public and publicly subsidized private high schools by data envelopment analysis (DEA), employing the results provided by a hierarchical linear model (HLM) applied to PISA-2006 (Programme for International Students Assessment) microdata. The study places special emphasis on the estimation of the determinants of school outcomes. The educational production function is estimated through an HLM that takes into account the nested nature of PISA data. Inefficiencies are then measured through DEA and decomposed into two types: managerial (related to individual performance), and programme (related to structural differences between management models), following the approach adopted by Silva Portela and Thanassoulis. Once differences in students’ backgrounds, school resources and individual management inefficiencies are removed, the results reveal that Spanish public high schools are more efficient than their publicly subsidized private equivalents.     

A comparison of chance-constrained DEA and stochastic frontier analysis: bank efficiency in Taiwan

We employed both chance-constrained data envelopment analysis (CCDEA) and stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) to measure the technical efficiency of 39 banks in Taiwan. Estimated results show that there are significant differences in efficiency scores between chance-constrained DEA and stochastic frontier production function. The advanced setting of the chance-constrained mechanism of DEA does not change the instinctive differences between DEA and SFA approaches. We further find that the ownership variable is still a significant variable to explain the technical efficiency in Taiwan, irrespective of whether a DEA, CCDEA or SFA approach is used.     

基于SFA与DEA模型的创新型城市科技创新效率实证研究

分别运用SFA模型和DEA模型对10个样本城市2001-2010年的科技创新效率进行定量测度,并对两种方法测度出的创新型城市科技创新效率值排序进行相关分析和一致性检验.结果表明两种方法测度出的创新型城市科技创新效率在数值上有显著差异,但在效率排序上具有很好的一致性.     

Comparing frontier methods for economic–environmental trade-off analysis

This paper uses a mechanistic frontier approach as a reference to evaluate the ability of conventional parametric (SFA) and non-parametric (DEA) frontier approaches for analyzing economic–environmental trade-offs. Conventional frontier approaches are environmentally adjusted through incorporating the materials balance principle. The analysis is worked out for the Flemish pig finishing case, which is both representative and didactic. Results show that, on average, SFA and DEA yield adequate economic–environmental trade-offs. Both methods are good estimators for technical efficiency. Cost allocative and environmental allocative efficiency scores are less robust, due to the well-known methodological advantages and disadvantages of SFA and DEA. For particular firms, SFA, DEA and the mechanistic approach may yield different economic–environmental trade-offs. One has therefore to be careful when using conventional frontier approaches for firm-specific decision support. The mechanistic approach allows for optimizing performances per average present finisher, which is the production unit in pig finishing. Conventional frontier methods do not allow for this optimization since the number of average present finishers varies along the production functions. Since the mechanistic production function is based on underlying growth, feed uptake and mortality functions, additional firm-specific indicators can also be calculated at each point of the production function.     

The impact of mismeasurement in performance benchmarking: A Monte Carlo comparison of SFA and DEA with different multi-period budgeting strategies

Performance-based budgeting has received increasing attention from public and for-profit organizations in an effort to achieve a fair and balanced allocation of funds among their individual producers or operating units for overall system optimization. Although existing frontier estimation models can be used to measure and rank the performance of each producer, few studies have addressed how the mismeasurement by frontier estimation models affects the budget allocation and system performance. There is therefore a need for analysis of the accuracy of performance assessments in performance-based budgeting. This paper reports the results of a Monte Carlo analysis in which measurement errors are introduced and the system throughput in various experimental scenarios is compared. Each scenario assumes a different multi-period budgeting strategy and production frontier estimation model; the frontier estimation models considered are stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) and data envelopment analysis (DEA). The main results are as follows: (1) the selection of a proper budgeting strategy and benchmark model can lead to substantial improvement in the system throughput; (2) a “peanut butter” strategy outperforms a discriminative strategy in the presence of relatively high measurement errors, but a discriminative strategy is preferred for small measurement errors; (3) frontier estimation models outperform models with randomly-generated ranks even in cases with relatively high measurement errors; (4) SFA outperforms DEA for small measurement errors, but DEA becomes increasingly favorable relative to SFA as the measurement errors increase.     

Trajectories of efficiency measurement: A bibliometric analysis of DEA and SFA

This study surveys the increasing research field of performance measurement by making use of a bibliometric literature analysis. We concentrate on two approaches, namely Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA) as the most important methods to evaluate the efficiency of individual and organizational performance. It is the first literature survey that analyses DEA and SFA publications jointly, covering contributions published in journals, indexed by the Web of Science database from 1978 to 2012. Our aim is to identify seminal papers, playing a major role in DEA and SFA development and to determine areas of adoption. We recognized a constant growth of publications during the years identifying DEA as a standard technique in Operations Research, whereas SFA is mainly adopted in Economic research fields. Making use of document co-citation analysis we identify Airports and Supplier Selection (DEA) as well as Banking and Agriculture (SFA) as most influential application areas. Furthermore, Sensitivity and Fuzzy Set Theory (DEA) as well as Bayesian Analysis and Heterogeneity (SFA) are found to be most influential research areas and seem to be methodological trends. By developing an adoption rate of knowledge we identify that research, in terms of citations, is more focusing on relatively old and recent research at the expenses of middle-aged contributions, which is a typical phenomenon of a fast developing discipline.     

Do internal controls improve operating efficiency of universities?

Improving operating efficiency is one objective of internal controls (IC). This paper investigates the relationship between IC implementation and operating efficiency of universities. Using data from questionnaire survey and from the field, this study measures IC implementation and applies data envelopment analysis to estimate operating efficiency of 99 universities in Taiwan. The OLS regression results indicate that IC implementation has an insignificant association with teaching-related efficiency, but has a negative and significant association with research-related efficiency. Dividing the sample into public and private universities, the analysis indicates that for public universities, IC implementation has no significant association with any of the two measures of efficiency. But, for private universities, there is a positive and significant association between IC implementation and teaching-related efficiency. The association between IC implementation and research-related efficiency is negative and significant.     

Incorporating performance measures with target levels in data envelopment analysis

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a technique for evaluating relative efficiencies of peer decision making units (DMUs) which have multiple performance measures. These performance measures have to be classified as either inputs or outputs in DEA. DEA assumes that higher output levels and/or lower input levels indicate better performance. This study is motivated by the fact that there are performance measures (or factors) that cannot be classified as an input or output, because they have target levels with which all DMUs strive to achieve in order to attain the best practice, and any deviations from the target levels are not desirable and may indicate inefficiency. We show how such performance measures with target levels can be incorporated in DEA. We formulate a new production possibility set by extending the standard DEA production possibility set under variable returns-to-scale assumption based on a set of axiomatic properties postulated to suit the case of targeted factors. We develop three efficiency measures by extending the standard radial, slacks-based, and Nerlove–Luenberger measures. We illustrate the proposed model and efficiency measures by applying them to the efficiency evaluation of 36 US universities.     

Construction project monitoring by means of RAM-based composite indicators

This paper aims to assess the performance of a sample of completed building projects in Oregon by employing the range-adjusted measure, a slack-based data envelopment analysis (DEA) model. In the first stage of analysis, project efficiency ratings (ie composite indicators) are derived using selected single performance indicators in a no-output model; whereas in the second stage, censored Tobit regression is employed to model the efficiency ratings. The results indicate that only four out of the 50 sample projects are efficient within the DEA context. Moreover, there is not much evidence for systematic effects of project size on DEA efficiency rating.     

Cost efficiency and scale economies in general dental practices in the US: a non-parametric and parametric analysis of Colorado data

This paper uses both the non-parametric method of data envelopment analysis (DEA) and the econometric method of stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) to study the production technology and cost efficiency of the US dental care industry using practice level data. The American Dental Association 2006 survey data for a number of general dental practices in the state of Colorado in the US are used for the empirical analysis. The findings suggest that the cost efficiency score is between 0.79 and 0.87, on average, and the cost inefficiency is mostly due to allocative rather than technical inefficiency. The optimal output level for a dental practice to fully exploit the economies of scale is estimated to be at $1.68 million. Average cost at this level of output is 50.6 cents for each dollar of gross billing generated. The DEA and SFA approaches provide generally consistent results.     

Private versus public high schools in Spain: disentangling managerial and programme efficiencies

The purpose of this paper is to compare the efficiency of a set of Spanish public and private high schools using data envelopment analysis (hereafter DEA). In view of the usual difficulties of obtaining reliable budget figures on private schools, we have used a restrictive efficiency notion which focuses on the relation between the academic results obtained by each school and the socio-economic background and academic profile of its pupils. In this study, special emphasis is placed upon decomposing the overall inefficiencies of each school into managerial (due to individual performance) and programme (due to structural differences between management models) components. Our results reveal that although, in general, private schools obtain better academic results than public schools in absolute terms, this is not the consequence of comparatively more effective management but rather of having pupils with a more favourable background for the educational process.     

基于DEA和SFA的我国商业银行效率研究

本文利用板块数据,分别采用非参数前沿法中的DEA法和参数前沿法中的SFA法对我国十四家商业银行1997-2001期间的综合效率进行了测度,在此基础上对两种方法测度出的银行效率值排序进行了相关分析和一致性检验,结果表明两种方法测度出的银行效率在数值上有显著差异,但在是效率排序上具有很好的一致性。     

Exploring the use of DEA for formative evaluation in primary diabetes care: An application to compare English practices

Primary care is currently at the heart of the UK National Health Service policy. Primary care trusts have the crucial role of improving the efficiency and equity in primary care delivery. However, few studies have focused on performance assessment in primary care provision. In this paper, we examine the role of data envelopment analysis (DEA) in helping decision makers to understand and improve the performance of primary care practices. We discuss the results from a study of 14 practices in England in terms of their delivery of diabetes services. In order to take into account the multiple values that underlie public services provision, we have considered several different perspectives for evaluation. These were: technical, allocative and cost efficiency, clinical and patient-focused effectiveness, and equity. The approach adopted involved a deep engagement with the practices. The purpose was to understand the structures and processes supporting effective practice using DEA in a formative role rather than the more usual summative role with a large data set. This approach is in the tradition of the developmental engagement approach of operational research.     

Multiobjective data envelopment analysis

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is popularly used to evaluate relative efficiency among public or private firms. Most DEA models are established by individually maximizing each firm's efficiency according to its advantageous expectation by a ratio. Some scholars have pointed out the interesting relationship between the multiobjective linear programming (MOLP) problem and the DEA problem. They also introduced the common weight approach to DEA based on MOLP. This paper proposes a new linear programming problem for computing the efficiency of a decision-making unit (DMU). The proposed model differs from traditional and existing multiobjective DEA models in that its objective function is the difference between inputs and outputs instead of the outputs/inputs ratio. Then an MOLP problem, based on the introduced linear programming problem, is formulated for the computation of common weights for all DMUs. To be precise, the modified Chebychev distance and the ideal point of MOLP are used to generate common weights. The dual problem of this model is also investigated. Finally, this study presents an actual case study analysing R&D efficiency of 10 TFT-LCD companies in Taiwan to illustrate this new approach. Our model demonstrates better performance than the traditional DEA model as well as some of the most important existing multiobjective DEA models.     

Tariff structure of Japanese electric power companies: An empirical analysis using DEA

This research explores a Marginal Cost (MC)-based pricing system, using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). This DEA technique is widely applied for performance analysis and efficiency measurement in public and private sectors. This article does not follow such a previous research direction, rather directing itself towards the new measurement of MC and Ramsey prices of multiple electric power services. As an important case study, this research applies the proposed DEA approach to examine how much the current tariffs of Japanese electric power services deviate from these MC and Ramsey prices. This type of research has never been explored in Japan, even though such a research effort is needed by many policy makers and consumers. It is hoped that our empirical findings can serve as a policy-making basis for guiding the Japanese electric power industry. This study believes that this Japanese experience is useful for other nations, such as Asia-Pacific countries, where many public industries are regulated by their governments.     

Separating Market Efficiency from Profitability and its Implications for Planning

This paper discusses the practical usefulness of separating market efficiency from profitability when assessing the comparative performance of private sector organizational units. The market efficiency of a unit reflects its ability to attract custom. The paper shows how data envelopment analysis can be used to assess market efficiency and it illustrates the usefulness of this measure in managing the public houses of a brewery.     

Past-present-future Intertemporal DEA models

It has been well recognized that to thoroughly evaluate a firm’s performance, the evaluator must assess not only its past and present records but also future potential. However, to the best of our knowledge, there are no data envelopment analysis (DEA)-type models proposed in the literature that simultaneously take past, present and, especially, future performance indicators into account. Hence, this research aims at developing a new type of DEA model referred to as Intertemporal DEA models that can be used to fully measure a firm’s efficiency by explicitly considering its key inputs and outputs involving the past-present-future time span. In this research, the proposed Intertemporal DEA models are applied to the performance evaluation of high-tech Integrated Circuit design companies in Taiwan to demonstrate their advantages over other DEA models that ignore intertemporal efficiency.     

基于三阶段DEA模型的我国碳排放效率分析

对我国区域碳排放效率的准确测评是各省区针对性制定减排战略的基础,经典DEA模型未能排除外部环境因素和随机因素的影响,本文利用三阶段DEA模型构建消除外部环境因素和随机因素的区域碳排放效率测算模型。研究表明我国碳排放高效率地区共有广东等9省,中效率地区共有湖南等16省,低效率地区共有甘肃等4省。用三阶段DEA模型测算出的各省1997~2010年平均碳排放效率结果与经典DEA模型测算结果有显著性差异,与我国经济发展实际和预期结果更加吻合,各省可以根据自身测评结果有针对性地提高综合碳排放效率。     

Linking customer satisfaction, employee appraisal, and business performance: an evaluation methodology in the banking sector

The linkage among customer satisfaction, employee evaluation, and business performance data is very important in modern business organizations. Several previous research efforts have studied this linkage, focusing mainly on the financial or business performance in order to analyze the efficiency of an organization. However, recent studies have tried to consider other important performance indicators, which are able to affect business operations and future growth (e.g., external and internal customer satisfaction). In the case of the banking industry, studying the relations among the aforementioned variables is able to give insight in the performance evaluation of bank branches and the viability analysis of the banking organization. This paper presents a real-world study for measuring the relative efficiency of a set of bank branches using a Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) approach. In particular, a multistage DEA network model is proposed, using a set of performance indicators that combine customer satisfaction, employee evaluation, and business performance indices. The main aim of the presented study is to evaluate the relative efficiency of each customer service delivery step, in the environment of a bank branch. The results are also able to estimate the contribution of the assessed performance indicators to the branch’s overall efficiency, and to determine potential improvement actions.     

A DEA analysis of risk,cost, and revenues in insurance

Insurance companies have to take risk and cost into account when pricing car insurance policies that cover the risk of private use of cars. In this paper we use data from 80?000 car insurance policies in order to assess, once risk and cost have been taken into account, the combinations of risk that generate the highest returns for the company under existing pricing practices. We use data envelopment analysis (DEA) and frame the study within an analysis of experiments context. The results of DEA are interpreted in a multivariate statistical analysis context using factor analysis, and property fitting techniques. The impact of risk factors in the efficiency is explored by means of regression analysis with dummy variables. There are consequences for the pricing policy of the company.