The Nature of the UC Double Bond: Pushing the Stability of High‐Oxidation‐State Uranium Carbenes to the Limit

Treatment of [K(BIPM^MesH)] (BIPM^Mes={C(PPh₂NMes)₂}^2?; Mes=C₆H₂‐2,4,6‐Me₃) with [UCl₄(thf)₃] (1 equiv) afforded [U(BIPM^MesH)(Cl)₃(thf)] ( 1 ), which generated [U(BIPM^Mes)(Cl)₂(thf)₂] ( 2 ), following treatment with benzyl potassium. Attempts to oxidise 2 resulted in intractable mixtures, ligand scrambling to give [U(BIPM^Mes)₂] or the formation of [U(BIPM^MesH)(O)₂(Cl)(thf)] ( 3 ). The complex [U(BIPM^Dipp)(μ‐Cl)₄(Li)₂(OEt₂)(tmeda)] ( 4 ) (BIPM^Dipp={C(PPh₂NDipp)₂}^2?; Dipp=C₆H₃‐2,6‐iPr₂; tmeda=N,N,N′,N′‐tetramethylethylenediamine) was prepared from [Li₂(BIPM^Dipp)(tmeda)] and [UCl₄(thf)₃] and, following reflux in toluene, could be isolated as [U(BIPM^Dipp)(Cl)₂(thf)₂] ( 5 ). Treatment of 4 with iodine (0.5 equiv) afforded [U(BIPM^Dipp)(Cl)₂(μ‐Cl)₂(Li)(thf)₂] ( 6 ). Complex 6 resists oxidation, and treating 4 or 5 with N‐oxides gives [{U(BIPM^DippH)(O)₂‐ (μ‐Cl)₂Li(tmeda)] ( 7 ) and [{U(BIPM^DippH)(O)₂(μ‐Cl)}₂] ( 8 ). Treatment of 4 with tBuOLi (3 equiv) and I₂ (1 equiv) gives [U(BIPM^Dipp)(OtBu)₃(I)] ( 9 ), which represents an exceptionally rare example of a crystallographically authenticated uranium(VI)–carbon σ bond. Although 9 appears sterically saturated, it decomposes over time to give [U(BIPM^Dipp)(OtBu)₃]. Complex 4 reacts with PhCOtBu and Ph₂CO to form [U(BIPM^Dipp)(μ‐Cl)₄(Li)₂(tmeda)(OCPhtBu)] ( 10 ) and [U(BIPM^Dipp)(Cl)(μ‐Cl)₂(Li)(tmeda)(OCPh₂)] ( 11 ). In contrast, complex 5 does not react with PhCOtBu and Ph₂CO, which we attribute to steric blocking. However, complexes 5 and 6 react with PhCHO to afford (DippNPPh₂)₂C?C(H)Ph ( 12 ). Complex 9 does not react with PhCOtBu, Ph₂CO or PhCHO; this is attributed to steric blocking. Theoretical calculations have enabled a qualitative bracketing of the extent of covalency in early‐metal carbenes as a function of metal, oxidation state and the number of phosphanyl substituents, revealing modest covalent contributions to U?C double bonds.     

Dilithium Hexaorganostannate(IV) Compounds

Hypercoordination of main‐group elements such as the heavier Group 14 elements (silicon, germanium, tin, and lead) usually requires strong electron‐withdrawing ligands and/or donating groups. Herein, we present the synthesis and characterization of two hexaaryltin(IV) dianions in form of their dilithium salts [Li₂(thf)₂{Sn(2‐py^Me)₆}] (py^Me=C₅H₃N‐5‐Me) ( 2 ) and [Li₂{Sn(2‐py^OtBu)₆}] (py^OtBu=C₅H₃N‐6‐OtBu) ( 3 ). Both complexes are stable in the solid state and solution under inert conditions. Theoretical investigations of compound 2 reveal a significant valence 5s‐orbital contribution of the tin atom forming six strongly polarized tin–carbon bonds.     

Synthesis and Structural Characterization of Some Novel Trialkylsilyl‐substituted Lithium Benzyl Complexes [Li(tmeda)][CHRSiMe2R′] (R = Ph, 3,5‐Me2C6H3; R′ = Me,tBu, Ph)

The reactions of PhCH₂SiMe₃ ( 1 ), PhCH₂SiMe₂^tBu ( 2 ), PhCH₂SiMe₂Ph ( 3 ), 3,5‐Me₂C₆H₃CH₂SiMe₃ ( 4 ), and 3,5‐Me₂C₆H₃CH₂SiMe₂^tBu ( 5 ) with ⁿBuLi in tetramethylethylenediamine (tmeda) afford the corresponding lithium complexes [Li(tmeda)][CHRSiMe₂R′] (R, R′ = Ph, Me ( 6 ), Ph, ^tBu ( 7 ), Ph, Ph ( 8 ), 3,5‐Me₂C₆H₃, Me ( 9 ), and 3,5‐Me₂C₆H₃, ^tBu ( 10 )), respectively. The new compounds 5 , 7 , 8 , 9 and 10 have been characterized by ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectroscopy, compounds 7 , 8 and 9 also by X‐ray structure analysis.     

Synthesis and Structure of a Novel Cluster with Trigonal-bipyramidal Ge_2Ru_3 Core

ＩｎｔｒｏｄｕｃｔｉｏｎＷｅｒｅｃｅｎｔｌｙｒｅｐｏｒｔｅｄａｎｉｎｔｒａｍｏｌｅｃｕｌａｒｔｈｅｒｍａｌｒｅａｒ ｒａｎｇｅｍｅｎｔｂｅｔｗｅｅｎＳｉ—ＳｉａｎｄＦｅ—Ｆｅｂｏｎｄｓｉｎｔｈｅｄｉｎｕ ｃｌｅａｒｉｒｏｎｃｏｍｐｌｅｘ { (Ｍｅ2 ＳｉＳｉＭｅ2 ) [(η5 Ｃ5Ｈ4 )Ｆｅ(ＣＯ) ]2 (μ ＣＯ) 2 } (Ｓｃｈｅｍｅ 1) .1 5Ｔｈｅｔｈｅｒｍａｌｒｅａｒｒａｎｇｅｍｅｎｔｗａｓｌａｔｅｒｅｘｔｅｎｄｅｄｔｏｇｅｒｍａｎｉｕｍ ｉｒｏｎａｎｄｓｉｌｉｃｏｎ ｒｕｔｈｅｎｉ ｕｍａｎａｌｏｇｕｅｓ .6 8Ｔｈ…     

Rare‐Earth‐Metal Methyl,Amide, and Imide Complexes Supported by a Superbulky Scorpionate Ligand

The reaction of monomeric [(Tp^tBu,Me)LuMe₂] (Tp^tBu,Me=tris(3‐Me‐5‐tBu‐pyrazolyl)borate) with primary aliphatic amines H₂NR (R=tBu, Ad=adamantyl) led to lutetium methyl primary amide complexes [(Tp^tBu,Me)LuMe(NHR)], the solid‐state structures of which were determined by XRD analyses. The mixed methyl/tetramethylaluminate compounds [(Tp^tBu,Me)LnMe({μ₂‐Me}AlMe₃)] (Ln=Y, Ho) reacted selectively and in high yield with H₂NR, according to methane elimination, to afford heterobimetallic complexes: [(Tp^tBu,Me)Ln({μ₂‐Me}AlMe₂)(μ₂‐NR)] (Ln=Y, Ho). X‐ray structure analyses revealed that the monomeric alkylaluminum‐supported imide complexes were isostructural, featuring bridging methyl and imido ligands. Deeper insight into the fluxional behavior in solution was gained by ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectroscopic studies at variable temperatures and ¹H–⁸⁹Y HSQC NMR spectroscopy. Treatment of [(Tp^tBu,Me)LnMe(AlMe₄)] with H₂NtBu gave dimethyl compounds [(Tp^tBu,Me)LnMe₂] as minor side products for the mid‐sized metals yttrium and holmium and in high yield for the smaller lutetium. Preparative‐scale amounts of complexes [(Tp^tBu,Me)LnMe₂] (Ln=Y, Ho, Lu) were made accessible through aluminate cleavage of [(Tp^tBu,Me)LnMe(AlMe₄)] with N,N,N′,N′‐tetramethylethylenediamine (tmeda). The solid‐state structures of [(Tp^tBu,Me)HoMe(AlMe₄)] and [(Tp^tBu,Me)HoMe₂] were analyzed by XRD.     

From Dibismuthenes to Three‐ and Two‐Coordinated Bismuthinidenes by Fine Ligand Tuning: Evidence for Aromatic BiC3N Rings through a Combined Experimental and Theoretical Study

The reduction of N,C,N‐chelated bismuth chlorides [C₆H₃‐2,6‐(CH?NR)₂]BiCl₂ [where R=tBu ( 1 ), 2′,6′‐Me₂C₆H₃ ( 2 ), or 4′‐Me₂NC₆H₄ ( 3 )] or N,C‐chelated analogues [C₆H₂‐2‐(CH?N‐2′,6′‐iPr₂C₆H₃)‐4,6‐(tBu)₂]BiCl₂ ( 4 ) and [C₆H₂‐2‐(CH₂NEt₂)‐4,6‐(tBu)₂]BiCl₂ ( 5 ) is reported. Reduction of compounds 1 – 3 gave monomeric N,C,N‐chelated bismuthinidenes [C₆H₃‐2,6‐(CH?NR)₂]Bi [where R=tBu ( 6 ), 2′,6′‐Me₂C₆H₃ ( 7 ) or 4′‐Me₂NC₆H₄ ( 8 )]. Similarly, the reduction of 4 led to the isolation of the compound [C₆H₂‐2‐(CH?N‐2′,6′‐iPr₂C₆H₃)‐4,6‐(tBu)₂]Bi ( 9 ) as an unprecedented two‐coordinated bismuthinidene that has been structurally characterized. In contrast, the dibismuthene {[C₆H₂‐2‐(CH₂NEt₂)‐4,6‐(tBu)₂]Bi}₂ ( 10 ) was obtained by the reduction of 5 . Compounds 6 – 10 were characterized by using ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectroscopy and their structures, except for 7 , were determined with the help of single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis. It is clear that the structure of the reduced products (bismuthinidene versus dibismuthene) is ligand‐dependent and particularly influenced by the strength of the N→Bi intramolecular interaction(s). Therefore, a theoretical survey describing the bonding situation in the studied compounds and related bismuth(I) systems is included. Importantly, we found that the C₃NBi chelating ring in the two‐coordinated bismuthinidene 9 exhibits significant aromatic character by delocalization of the bismuth lone pair.     

Dioxygen Activation by Non‐Adiabatic Oxidative Addition to a Single Metal Center

A chromium(I) dinitrogen complex reacts rapidly with O₂ to form the mononuclear dioxo complex [Tp^tBu,MeCr^V(O)₂] (Tp^tBu,Me=hydrotris(3‐tert‐butyl‐5‐methylpyrazolyl)borate), whereas the analogous reaction with sulfur stops at the persulfido complex [Tp^tBu,MeCr^III(S₂)]. The transformation of the putative peroxo intermediate [Tp^tBu,MeCr^III(O₂)] (S=³/₂) into [Tp^tBu,MeCr^V(O)₂] (S=¹/₂) is spin‐forbidden. The minimum‐energy crossing point for the two potential energy surfaces has been identified. Although the dinuclear complex [(Tp^tBu,MeCr)₂(μ‐O)₂] exists, mechanistic experiments suggest that O₂ activation occurs on a single metal center, by an oxidative addition on the quartet surface followed by crossover to the doublet surface.     

Diimido‐, Imido(oxo)‐, Dioxo‐ und Imido(alkyliden)‐Halbsandwich‐Verbindungen über selektive Hydrolyse und α—H‐Abstraktion an Organylkomplexen des sechswertigen Molybdäns und Wolframs

Diimido, Imido Oxo, Dioxo, and Imido Alkylidene Halfsandwich Compounds via Selective Hydrolysis and α—H Abstraction in Molybdenum(VI) and Tungsten(VI) Organyl Complexes Organometal imides [(η⁵‐C₅R₅)M(NR′)₂Ph] (M = Mo, W, R = H, Me, R′ = Mes, tBu) 4 — 8 can be prepared by reaction of halfsandwich complexes [(η⁵‐C₅R₅)M(NR′)₂Cl] with phenyl lithium in good yields. Starting from phenyl complexes 4 — 8 as well as from previously described methyl compounds [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)M(NtBu)₂Me] (M = Mo, W), reactions with aqueous HCl lead to imido(oxo) methyl and phenyl complexes [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)M(NtBu)(O)(R)] M = Mo, R = Me ( 9 ), Ph ( 10 ); M = W, R = Ph ( 11 ) and dioxo complexes [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)M(O)₂(CH₃)] M = Mo ( 12 ), M = W ( 13 ). Hydrolysis of organometal imides with conservation of M‐C σ and π bonds is in fact an attractive synthetic alternative for the synthesis of organometal oxides with respect to known strategies based on the oxidative decarbonylation of low valent alkyl CO and NO complexes. In a similar manner, protolysis of [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)W(NtBu)₂(CH₃)] and [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)Mo(NtBu)₂(CH₃)] by HCl gas leads to [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)W(NtBu)Cl₂(CH₃)] 14 und [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)Mo(NtBu)Cl₂(CH₃)] 15 with conservation of the M‐C bonds. The inert character of the relatively non‐polar M‐C σ bonds with respect to protolysis offers a strategy for the synthesis of methyl chloro complexes not accessible by partial methylation of [(η⁵‐C₅R₅)M(NR′)Cl₃] with MeLi. As pure substances only trimethyl compounds [(η⁵‐C₅R₅)M(NtBu)(CH₃)₃] 16 ‐ 18 , M = Mo, W, R = H, Me, are isolated. Imido(benzylidene) complexes [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)M(NtBu)(CHPh)(CH₂Ph)] M = Mo ( 19 ), W ( 20 ) are generated by alkylation of [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)M(NtBu)Cl₃] with PhCH₂MgCl via α‐H abstraction. Based on nmr data a trend of decreasing donor capability of the ligands [NtBu]^2— > [O]^2— > [CHR]^2— ? 2 [CH₃]^— > 2 [Cl]^— emerges.     

Neutral and Anionic Monomeric Zirconium Imides Prepared via Selective C=N Bond Cleavage of a Multidentate and Sterically Demanding β‐Diketiminato Ligand

A sterically encumbering multidentate β‐diketiminato ligand, ^tBuL2 (^tBuL2=[ArNC(tBu)CHC(tBu)NCH₂CH₂N(Me)CH₂CH₂NMe₂]^?, Ar=2,6‐iPr₂C₆H₃), is reported in this study along with its coordination chemistry to zirconium(IV). Using the lithio salt of this ligand, Li(^tBuL2) ( 4 ), the zirconium(IV) precursor (^tBuL2)ZrCl₃ ( 6 ) could be readily prepared in 85 % yield and structurally characterized. Reduction of 6 with 2 equiv of KC₈ resulted in formation of the terminal and mononuclear zirconium imide‐chloride [C(tBu)CHC(tBu)NCH₂CH₂N(Me)CH₂CH₂NMe₂]Zr(=NAr)(Cl) ( 7 ) as the result of reductive C=N cleavage of the imino fragment in the multidentate ligand ^tBuL2 by an elusive Zr^II species (^tBuL2)ZrCl ( A ). The azabutadienyl ligand in 7 can be further reduced by 2 e^? with KC₈ to afford the anionic imide [K(THF)₂]{[CH(tBu)CHC(tBu)NCH₂CH₂N(Me)CH₂CH₂N(Me)CH₂]Zr=NAr} ( 8‐2THF ) in 42 % isolated yield. Complex 8‐2THF results from the oxidative addition of an amine C?H bond followed by migration to the vinylic group of the formal [C(tBu)CHC(tBu)NCH₂CH₂N(Me)CH₂CH₂NMe₂]^? ligand in 7 . All halides in 6 can be replaced with azides to afford (^tBuL2)Zr(N₃)₃ ( 9 ) which was structurally characterized, and reduction with two equiv of KC₈ also results in C=N bond cleavage of ^tBuL2 to form [C(tBu)CHC(tBu)NCH₂CH₂N(Me)CH₂CH₂NMe₂]Zr(=NAr)(N₃) ( 10 ), instead of the expected azide disproportionation to N^3? and N₂. Solid‐state single crystal structural studies confirm the formation of mononuclear and terminal zirconium imido groups in 7 , 8‐Et₂O , and 10 with Zr=NAr distances being 1.8776(10), 1.9505(15), and 1.881(3) Å, respectively.     

Highly active copolymerization of ethylene with 10‐undecen‐1‐ol using phenoxy‐based zirconium/methylaluminoxane catalysts

Activated with methylaluminoxane (MAO), phenoxy‐based zirconium complexes bis[(3‐^tBu‐C₆H₃‐2‐O)‐CH?NC₆H₅]ZrCl₂, bis[(3,5‐di‐^tBu‐C₆H₂‐2‐O)‐PhC?NC₆H₅] ZrCl₂, and bis[(3,5‐di‐^tBu‐C₆H₂‐2‐O)‐PhC?N(2‐F‐C₆H₄)]ZrCl₂ for the first time have been used for the copolymerization of ethylene with 10‐undecen‐1‐ol. In comparison with the conventional metallocene, the phenoxy‐based zirconium complexes exhibit much higher catalytic activities [>10⁷ g of polymer (mol of catalyst)^?1 h^?1]. The incorporation of 10‐undecen‐1‐ol into the copolymers and the properties of the copolymers are strongly affected by the catalyst structure. Among the three catalysts, complex c is the most favorable for preparing higher molecular weight functionalized polyethylene containing a higher content of hydroxyl groups. Studies on the polymerization conditions indicate that the incorporated commoner content in the copolymers mainly depends on the comonomer concentration in the feed. The catalytic activity is slightly affected by the Al_(MAO)/Zr molar ratio but decreases greatly with an increase in the polymerization temperature. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 43: 5944–5952, 2005     

Ein ungewöhnlicher ambivalenter Zinn(II)‐oxo‐Cluster

An Unusual Ambivalent Tin(II)‐oxo Cluster The reaction of the copper aryl CuDmp (Dmp = 2, 6‐Mes₂C₆H₃; Mes = 2, 4, 6‐Me₃C₆H₂) with the stannanediyl Sn{1, 2‐(tBuCH₂N)₂C₆H₄} followed by hydrolysis affords in the presence of lithium‐tert‐butoxide the tin(II)‐oxo cluster {(Et₂O)(LiOtBu)(SnO)(CuDmp)}₂ ( 5 ) in small yield. The solid state structure of the colorless compound shows a central Li₂Sn₂O₂(OtBu)₂ fragment with heterocubane structure. In addition, the Li‐acceptor and O(Sn)‐donor atoms are used for the coordination of one molecule diethylether and copper aryl CuDmp, respectively.     

Direct Synthesis of Titanium Complexes with Chelating cis‐9,10‐Dihydrophenanthrenediamide Ligands through Sequential C?C Bond‐Forming Reactions from o‐Metalated Arylimines

A series of new titanium(IV) complexes with o‐metalated arylimine and/or cis‐9,10‐dihydrophenanthrenediamide ligands, [o‐C₆H₄(CH?NR)TiCl₃] (R=2,6‐iPr₂C₆H₃ ( 3 a ), 2,6‐Me₂C₆H₃ ( 3 b ), tBu ( 3 c )), [cis‐9,10‐PhenH₂(NR)₂TiCl₂] (PhenH₂=9,10‐dihydrophenanthrene; R=2,6‐iPr₂C₆H₃ ( 4 a ), 2,6‐Me₂C₆H₃ ( 4 b ), tBu ( 4 c )), [{cis‐9,10‐PhenH₂(NR)₂}{o‐C₆H₄(HC?NR)}TiCl] (R=2,6‐iPr₂C₆H₃ ( 5 a ), 2,6‐Me₂C₆H₃ ( 5 b ), tBu ( 5 c )), have been synthesised from the reactions of TiCl₄ with o‐C₆H₄(CH?NR)Li (R=2,6‐iPr₂C₆H₃, 2,6‐Me₂C₆H₃, tBu). Complexes 4 and 5 were formed unexpectedly from the reactions of TiCl₄ with two or three equivalents of the corresponding o‐C₆H₄(CH?NR)Li followed by sequential intramolecular C? C bond‐forming reductive elimination and oxidative coupling reactions. Attempts to isolate the intermediates, [{o‐C₆H₄(CH?NR)}₂TiCl₂] ( 2 ), were unsuccessful. All complexes were characterised by ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectroscopy, and the molecular structures of 3 a , 4 a – c , 5 a , and 5 c were determined by X‐ray crystallography.     

New Ga/N‐based Active Lewis Pairs,Trifunctional Ga–Ga Compounds,Reactions with Cyanamide and Dual Insertion of Isocyanate

Hydrogallation of Me₃Si–C≡C–NR'₂ with R₂Ga–H (R = tBu, CH₂tBu, iBu) yielded Ga/N‐based active Lewis pairs, R₂Ga–C(SiMe₃)=C(H)–NR'₂ ( 7 ). The Ga and N atoms adopt cis‐positions at the C=C bonds and show weak Ga–N interactions. tBu₂GaH and Me₃Si–C≡C–N(C₂H₄)₂NMe afforded under exposure of daylight the trifunctional digallium(II) compound [MeN(C₂H₄)₂N](H)C=C(SiMe₃)Ga(tBu)–Ga(tBu)C(SiMe₃)=C(H)[N(C₂H₄)₂NMe] ( 8 ), which results from elimination of isobutene and H₂ and Ga–Ga bond formation. 8 was selectively obtained from the ynamine and [tBu(H)Ga–Ga(H)tBu]₂[HGatBu₂]₂. 7a (R = tBu; NR'₂ = 2,6‐Me₂NC₅H₈) and H₈C₄N–C≡N afforded the adduct tBu₂Ga‐C(SiMe₃)=C(H)(2,6‐Me₂NC₅H₈) · N≡C–NC₄H₈ ( 11 ) with the nitrile bound to gallium. The analogous ALP with harder Al atoms yielded an adduct of the nitrile dimer or oligomers of the nitrile at room temperature. The reaction of 7a with Ph–N=C=O led to the insertion of two NCO groups into the Ga–C_vinyl bond to yield a GaOCNCN heterocycle with Ga bound to O and N atoms ( 12 ).     

Insights into the Intramolecular Donor Stabilisation of Organostannylene Palladium and Platinum Complexes: Syntheses,Structures and DFT Calculations

The syntheses of the transition metal complexes cis‐[(4‐tBu‐2,6‐{P(O)(OiPr)₂}₂C₆H₂SnCl)₂MX₂] ( 1 , M=Pd, X=Cl; 2 , M=Pd, X=Br; 3 , M=Pd, X=I; 4 , M=Pt, X=Cl), cis‐[{2,6‐(Me₂NCH₂)₂C₆H₃SnCl}₂MX₂] ( 5 , M=Pd, X=I; 6 , M=Pt, X=Cl), trans‐[{2,6‐(Me₂NCH₂)₂C₆H₃SnI}₂PtI₂] ( 7 ) and trans‐[(4‐tBu‐2,6‐{P(O)(OiPr)₂}₂ C₆H₂SnCl)PdI₂]₂ ( 8 ) are reported. Also reported is the serendipitous formation of the unprecedented complexes trans‐[(4‐tBu‐2,6‐{P(O)(OiPr)₂}₂C₆H₂SnCl)₂ Pt(SnCl₃)₂] ( 10 ) and [(4‐tBu‐2,6‐{P(O) (OiPr)₂}₂C₆H₂SnCl)₃Pt(SnCl₃)₂] ( 11 ). The compounds were characterised by elemental analyses, ¹H, ¹³C, ³¹P, ¹¹⁹Sn and ¹⁹⁵Pt NMR spectroscopy, single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis, UV/Vis spectroscopy and, in the cases of compounds 1 , 3 and 4 , also by Mössbauer spectroscopy. All the compounds show the tin atoms in a distorted trigonal‐bipyramidal environment. The Mössbauer spectra suggest the tin atoms to be present in the oxidation state III. The kinetic lability of the complexes was studied by redistribution reactions between compounds 1 and 3 as well as between 1 and cis‐[{2,6‐(Me₂NCH₂)₂C₆H₃SnCl}₂PdCl₂]. DFT calculations provided insights into both the bonding situation of the compounds and the energy difference between the cis and trans isomers. The latter is influenced by the donor strength of the pincer‐type ligands.     

Facile synthesis of zwitterionic organoaluminum complexes containing formally dianionic homoscorpionate ligands

A series of zwitterionic aluminum complexes of the type AlX[(2‐O‐3,5‐tBu₂C₆H₂)₃PZ] (AlX [O₃PZ]; X = Cl, Me, Et, and iBu; Z = H, Me) containing C₃‐symmetric, formally dianionic, facially tridentate ligands [O₃PZ]^2? were prepared and structurally characterized. Although serendipitous, these complexes can be readily synthesized by partial protonolysis of AlX₃ with equal molar (2‐HO‐3,5‐tBu₂C₆H₂)₃P (H₃[O₃P]) or [(2‐HO‐3,5‐tBu₂C₆H₂)₃p.m.e](OTf) ({H₃[O₃PMe]}OTf) in THF at 25°C or elevated temperatures. Alcoholysis of AlMe[O₃PMe] ( 2 ) with an excess amount of MeOH in refluxing toluene generates AlOMe[O₃PMe] ( 10 ). Salt metathesis of AlCl[O₃PMe] ( 6 ) with nBuM (M = Li, MgCl) and NaOR (R = tBu, Ph) in ethereal solutions affords AlnBu[O₃PMe] ( 9 ) and AlOR[O₃PMe] (R = tBu ( 11 ), Ph ( 12 )), respectively. Reactivity of 10 , 11 , and 12 with respect to catalytic ring‐opening polymerization of ε‐caprolactone is assessed.     

Synthesis and Characterization of Metal Complexes (M = Al,Ti, W,Zn) Containing Pyrrole‐imine Ligands

A series of metal compounds (M = Al, Ti, W, and Zn) containing pyrrole‐imine ligands have been prepared and structurally characterized. The reactions of AlMe₃ with one and three equivs of pyrrole‐imine ligand [C₄H₃NH‐(2‐CH=N? CH₂Ph)] ( 1 ) generated aluminum compounds Al[C₄H₃N‐(2‐CH=N? CH₂Ph)]Me₂ ( 2 ) and Al[C₄H₃N‐(2‐CH=NCH₂Ph)]₃ ( 3 ), respectively, in relatively high yield. Reacting two equivs of 1 with Ti(OⁱPr)₄, W(NH^tBu)₂(=N^tBu)₂, or ZnMe₂ afforded Ti[C₄H₃N‐(2‐CH=NCH₂Ph)]₂(OⁱPr)₂ ( 4 ), W[C₄H₃N‐(2‐CH=NCH₂Ph)]₂(=N^tBu)₂ ( 5 ), and Zn[C₄H₃N‐(2‐CH=NCH₂Ph)]₂ ( 6 ), respectively. All the compounds have been characterized by ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectroscopy. Compounds 3 – 6 have also been characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray structural analysis. The biting angles of pyrrole‐imine ligand with metals decrease and their related M? N_pyrrole and M? N_imine bond lengths increase in the order of 6 , 3 , 4 , and 5 .     

Synthese und Charakterisierung der Siloxialane [H2AlOSiMe3]n und [HAl(OtBu)(OSiMe3)]2 sowie Redoxreaktionen von [H2AlOSiMe3]n und [H2AlOtBu]2 mit einem Zinn(II)‐amid

Synthesis and Characterisation of the Siloxialanes [H₂AlOSiMe₃]_n and [HAl(O^tBu)(OSiMe₃)]₂ as well as the Use of [H₂AlOSiMe₃]_n and [H₂AlO^tBu]₂ as Reducing Agents for a Tin(II) Amide Following the synthesis of [H₂AlO^tBu]₂ ( 1 ) and [HAl(O^tBu)₂]₂ ( 2 ) the siloxialane [H₂AlOSiMe₃]_n ( 3 ) was synthesized and has been subject to single crystal X‐ray analysis for the first time. The molecule 3 is tetrameric (n = 4) in solution and polymeric (n = ∞) in the solid state. 3 is also obtained together with the siloxide [Al(OSiMe₃)₃]₂ ( 5 ) by the reaction of the aluminiumhydride with the double molar amount of trimethylsilanol. The expected monohydride [HAl(OSiMe₃)₂]₂ ( 4 ) was not formed. The heteroleptic monohydride [HAl(O^tBu)(OSiMe₃)]₂ ( 6 ) was synthesized by the reaction of 3 with an equimolar amount of tert‐butanol and was also generated by the addition of trimethylsilanol to an equimolar amount of the alkoxialane [H₂AlO^tBu]₂ ( 1 ). Compound 6 was characterized by single crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis. Additionally we investigated the reducing force of the dihydrides 1 and 3 towards the cyclic diazastannylene Me₂Si(N^tBu)₂Sn ( 7 ). In the course of this reaction Sn^II in 7 was reduced to elementary tin whereas the hydrides were oxidized to hydrogene. Tin is obtained in its β‐form as found by powder‐X‐ray diffraction. The shapes of the metal precipitates (porous, sponge‐like pieces or nanoscaled powders) depend on the conditions of reactions. Besides the elements the spirocyclic aminoalkoxialane [Me₂Si(N^tBu)₂AlO^tBu]₂ ( 8 ) or aminosiloxialane [Me₂Si(N^tBu)₂AlOSiMe₃]₂ ( 9 ) are formed. Structural details of the molecules 8 and 9 can be derived from single crystal X‐ray analyses.     

Synthesis and Structural Characterization of New Zirconium(IV) Bent Metallocenes comprising η8‐Cyclooctatetraenyl and Bulky Cyclopentadienyl Ligands

The new zirconium bent metallocenes (COT)Zr(Cp^tBu2)Cl ( 1 ) and (COT)Zr(Cp′′)Cl ( 2 ) were synthesized in a straightforward manner and in high yields ( 1 : 91 %, 2 : 86 %) by treatment of in situ‐prepared (COT)ZrCl₂(THF) with 1 equiv. of K(Cp^tBu2) or K(Cp′′), respectively (COT = η⁸‐cyclooctatetraenyl; Cp^tBu2 = η⁵‐1,3‐di‐tert‐butylcyclopentadienyl; Cp′′ = η⁵‐1,3‐bis(trimethylsilyl)cyclopentadienyl). Subsequent reaction of 1 with 1 equiv. of phenyllithium afforded the σ‐phenyl derivative (Cp^tBu2)Zr(COT)Ph ( 3 ) as orange crystals in 83 % isolated yield. All three new compounds were structurally characterized through single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction.     

Phosphine (oxide)‐(thio) phenolate palladium complexes: Synthesis,characterization and (co)polymerization of norbornene

A series of palladium complexes ( 2a–2g ) ( 2a : [6‐^tBu‐2‐PPh₂‐C₆H₃O]PdMe(Py); 2b : [6‐C₆F₅–2‐PPh₂‐C₆H₃O]PdMe(Py); 2c : [6‐^tBu‐2‐PPh^tBu‐C₆H₃O]PdMe(Py); 2d : [2‐PPh^tBu‐C₆H₄O] PdMe(Py); 2e : [6‐SiMe₃–2‐PPh₂‐C₆H₃O]PdMe(Py); 2f : [2‐^tBu‐6‐(Ph₂P=O)‐C₆H₃O]PdMe(Py); 2g : [6‐SiMe₃–2‐(Ph₂P=O)‐C₆H₃S]PdMe(Py)) bearing phosphine (oxide)‐(thio) phenolate ligand have been efficiently synthesized and characterized. The solid‐state structures of complexes 2d , 2f and 2g have been further confirmed by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction, which revealed a square‐planar geometry of palladium center. In the presence of B(C₆F₅)₃, these complexes can be used as catalysts to polymerize norbornene (NB) with relatively high yields, producing vinyl‐addition polymers. Interestingly, 2a /B(C₆F₅)₃ system catalyzed the polymerization of NB in living polymerization manner at high temperature (polydispersity index 1.07, M_n up to 1.5 × 10⁴). The co‐polymerization of NB and polar monomers was also studied using catalysts 2a and 2f . All the obtained co‐polymers could dissolve in common solvent.     

Cation‐Mediated Conversion of the State of Charge in Uranium Arene Inverted‐Sandwich Complexes

Two new arene inverted‐sandwich complexes of uranium supported by siloxide ancillary ligands [K{U(OSi(OtBu)₃)₃}₂(μ‐η⁶:η⁶‐C₇H₈)] ( 3 ) and [K₂{U(OSi(OtBu)₃)₃}₂(μ‐η⁶:η⁶‐C₇H₈)] ( 4 ) were synthesized by the reduction of the parent arene‐bridged complex [{U(OSi(OtBu)₃)₃}₂(μ‐η⁶:η⁶‐C₇H₈)] ( 2 ) with stoichiometric amounts of KC₈ yielding a rare family of inverted‐sandwich complexes in three states of charge. The structural data and computational studies of the electronic structure are in agreement with the presence of high‐valent uranium centers bridged by a reduced tetra‐anionic toluene with the best formulation being U^V–(arene^4?)–U^V, KU^IV–(arene^4?)–U^V, and K₂U^IV–(arene^4?)–U^IV for complexes 2 , 3 , and 4 respectively. The potassium cations in complexes 3 and 4 are coordinated to the siloxide ligands both in the solid state and in solution. The addition of KOTf (OTf=triflate) to the neutral compound 2 promotes its disproportionation to yield complexes 3 and 4 (depending on the stoichiometry) and the U^IV mononuclear complex [U(OSi(OtBu)₃)₃(OTf)(thf)₂] ( 5 ). This unprecedented reactivity demonstrates the key role of potassium for the stability of these complexes.