Correlated one‐electron wave functions

Using four basis sets, 6‐311G(d,p), 6‐31+G(d,p), 6‐311++G(2d,2p), and 6‐311++G(3df,3pd), the optimized structures with all real frequencies were obtained at the MP2 level for dimers CH₂O? HF, CH₂O? H₂O, CH₂O? NH₃, and CH₂O? CH₄. The structures of CH₂O? HF, CH₂O? H₂O, and CH₂O? NH₃ are cycle‐shaped, which result from the larger bend of σ‐type hydrogen bonds. The bend of σ‐type H‐bond O…H? Y (Y?F, O, N) is illustrated and interpreted by an attractive interaction of a chemically intuitive π‐type hydrogen bond. The π‐type hydrogen bond is the interaction between one of the acidic H atoms of CH₂O and lone pair(s) on the F atom in HF, the O atom in H₂O, or the N atom in NH₃. By contrast with above the three dimers, for CH₂O? CH₄, because there is not a π‐type hydrogen‐bond to bend its linear hydrogen bond, the structure of CH₂O? CH₄ is a noncyclic shaped. The interaction energy of hydrogen bonds and the π‐type H‐bond are calculated and discussed at the CCSD(T)/6‐311++G(3df,3pd) level. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Quantum Chem, 2005     

Long‐range π‐type hydrogen bond in dimers CH2?HF,CH2O?H2O,and CH2O?NH3

Using four basis bets, (6‐311G(d,p), 6‐31+G(d,p), 6‐31++G(2d,2p), and 6‐311++G(3df,3pd), the optimized structures with all real frequencies were obtained at the MP2 level for the dimers CH₂O? HF, CH₂O? H₂O, CH₂O? NH₃, and CH₂O? CH₄. The structures of CH₂O? HF, CH₂O? H₂O, and CH₂O? NH₃ are cycle‐shaped, which result from the larger bend of σ‐type hydrogen bonds. The bend of σ‐type H‐bond O…H? Y (Y?F, O, N) is illustrated and interpreted by an attractive interaction of a chemically intuitive π‐type hydrogen bond. The π‐type hydrogen bond is the interaction between one of the H atoms of CH₂O and lone pair(s) on the F atom in HF, the O atom in H₂O, or the N atom in NH₃. In contrast with the above three dimers, for CH₂O? CH₄, because there is not a π‐type hydrogen bond to bend its linear hydrogen bond, the structure of CH₂O? CH₄ is noncyclic shaped. The interaction energy of hydrogen bonds and the π‐type H‐bond are calculated and discussed at the CCSD (T)/6‐311++G(3df,3pd) level. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Quantum Chem, 2005     

Über Wasserstoffbrücken im α-KZnBr3 · 2 H2O

Hydrogen Bondings in α-KZnBr₃ · 2 H₂O The positions of the hydrogen atoms and the system of hydrogen bondings in the crystal structure of α-KZnBr₃ · 2 H₂O are discussed. The hydrogen atoms have been located by FOURIER difference synthesis. IR-spectra have given some information about the strength of the various hydrogen bondings O? H …? H and O? H …? Br.     

Fluoride und Fluorosäuren. V. Kristallstruktur der 1:4-Phase im System Wasser-Fluorwasserstoff und eine neue Untersuchung einer der 1:2-Phasen

Fluorides and Fluoro Acids. V. Crystal Structure of the 1:4 Phase in the System Water-Hydrogen Fluoride and a New Investigation of One of the 1:2 Phases In the quasi binary system H₂O? HF the 1:2 phase of known crystal structure was recognized as the stable high-temperature phase. A more accurate redetermination of its structure (monoclinic, space group P2₁/c, Z = 4, a = 3.477, b = 6.024, c = 11.358 Å, β = 96.70° at ?100°C, R = 0.032 for 1356 observed MoKα data) confirmed the previous results of a layer structure formed by strong hydrogen bonds. H₃OF · HF appears besides H₃OHF₂ as a possible structural formula. — The crystal structure of the 1:4 phase of the system was also determined (triclinic, P1 , Z = 2, a = 5.574, b = 6.429, c = 6.874 Å, α = 115.79, β = 96.63, γ = 108.79° at ?113°C, R = 0.049 for 1942 observed MoKα data). By strong hydrogen bonds the atoms form rings, which are condensed to parallel ribbons. Possible structural formulae, based on the distribution of interatomic distances, are H₃OH₃F₄, H₃OH₂F₃ · HF and H₃OF · 3 HF. — Interatomic distances in the hydrogen bonds F? H…?F and O? H…?F of both structures and the known one of the 1:1 phase are discussed in comparison.     

trans‐Diaquabis(3‐hydroxybenzoato‐κO1)bis(nicotinamide‐κN1)copper(II)

The title compound, [Cu(C₇H₅O₃)₂(C₆H₆N₂O)₂(H₂O)₂], is a two‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded supramolecular complex. The Cu^II ion resides on a centre of symmetry and is in an octahedral coordination environment comprising two pyridine N atoms, two carboxylate O atoms and two O atoms from water molecules. Intermolecular N—H...O and O—H...O hydrogen bonds produce R₂²(4), R₂²(8) and R₂²(15) rings which lead to one‐dimensional polymeric chains. An extensive two‐dimensional network of N—H...O and O—H...O hydrogen bonds and C—H...π interactions are responsible for crystal stabilization.     

trans‐Diaquabis(nicotinamide‐κN)bis(salicylato‐κO)cobalt(II)

The title compound, [Co(C₇H₅O₃)₂(C₆H₆N₂O)₂(H₂O)₂], forms a three‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded supramolecular structure. The Co^II ion is in an octahedral coordination environment comprising two pyridyl N atoms, two carboxylate O atoms and two O atoms from water molecules. Intermolecular N—H...O and O—H...O hydrogen bonds produce R₂²(8), R₂²(12) and R₂²(14) rings, which lead to two‐dimensional chains. An extensive three‐dimensional supramolecular network of C—H...O, N—H...O and O—H...O hydrogen bonds and C—H...π interactions is responsible for crystal structure stabilization. This study is an example of the construction of a supramolecular assembly based on hydrogen bonds in mixed‐ligand metal complexes.     

Diaquabis(4‐fluorobenzoato‐κO)bis(nicotinamide‐κN)cobalt(II)

The title compound, [Co(C₇H₄FO₂)₂(C₆H₆N₂O)₂(H₂O)₂], is a three‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded supramolecular complex. The Co^II ion resides on a centre of symmetry and is in an octahedral coordination environment comprising two pyridyl N atoms, two carboxylate O atoms and two O atoms from water molecules. Intermolecular N—H...O and O—H...O hydrogen bonds produce R₃²(6), R₂²(12) and R₂²(16) rings, which lead to two‐dimensional chains. An extensive three‐dimensional network of C—H...F, N—H...O and O—H...O hydrogen bonds and π–π interactions are responsible for crystal stabilization.     

trans‐Di­aqua­bis­(thio­semicarb­azido‐κ2N,S)­nickel(II) dimaleate dihydrate

In the title compound, [Ni(CH₅N₃S)₂(H₂O)₂](C₄H₃O₄)₂·2H₂O, the Ni atom lies on a center of symmetry and is coordinated by N and S atoms from two thio­semicarbazide ligands and the O atoms of two water mol­ecules in a distorted octahedral geometry. In the asymmetric unit, the three components are linked together by one O—H⋯O and two N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds. The packing is built from molecular ribbons parallel to the b direction, stabilized by intramolecular hydrogen bonds, and by one N—H⋯S and two N—H⋯O intermolecular hydrogen bonds. The ribbons are further connected into columns by N—H⋯O interactions and then into a three‐dimensional network by three O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds.     

Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Diffusion of Vitamin C in Water Solution

Under different temperatures and concentrations, the diffusion of Vitamin C (VC) in water solution was examined by molecular dynamics simulation. The diffusion coefficients were calculated based on the Einstein equation. The influences of temperature, concentration, and simulation time on the diffusion coefficient were discussed. The results showed that at higher temperature and lower concentration the normal diffusions appear relatively late, but the linear range of mean square displacement curves continues longer than that at lower temperature and higher concentration. At the same temperature, the normal diffusion time increases and the diffusion coefficient decreases as the simulation concentration increases. These simulation results are in good agreement with experiments. Analyses of the pair correlation functions of the simulation systems showed that hydrogen bonds are mainly formed between the hydrogen atoms of VC molecules and oxygen atoms of H₂O molecules, rather than between the O atoms of VC molecules and H atoms of H₂O molecules. The diffusion coefficient is higher as the interaction between water molecules and VC molecules is stronger when VC concentration is lower. The water in the model systems affects the diffusion of VC molecules by the short‐range repulsion of O(H₂O)‐O(H₂O) pairs and the non‐bond interaction of H(H₂O)‐H(H₂O) pairs. The short‐range repulsion of O(H₂O)‐O(H₂O) pairs is greater when VC concentration is higher, the diffusion of VC is weaker. The greater the non‐bond interaction of H(H₂O)‐H(H₂O) pairs is, the higher the VC diffusion is. It is expected that this study can provide a theoretical direction for the experiments on the mass transfer of VC in water solution.     

Tetraaquabis(2‐methoxybenzaldehyde isonicotinoylhydrazone)cadmium(II) dinitrate

The Cd^II centre in the title complex, [Cd(C₁₄H₁₃N₃O₂)₂(H₂O)₄](NO₃)₂, occupies a crystallographic inversion centre and is coordinated by two donor N atoms from two 2‐methoxybenzldehyde isonicotinoylhydrazone ligands and by four O atoms from four coordinated water molecules, giving a slightly distorted octahedral geometry. There is an extended three‐dimensional network structure resulting from O—H...O hydrogen bonds between coordinated water and nitrate anions, and between coordinated water and carbonyl O atoms, and from N—H...O hydrogen bonds between NH groups and nitrate O atoms.     

2‐Ethyl‐6‐methylpyridin‐3‐ol and its salt bis(2‐ethyl‐3‐hydroxy‐6‐methylpyridinium) succinate

The title compounds, C₈H₁₁NO, (I), and 2C₈H₁₂NO⁺·C₄H₄O₄²⁻, (II), both crystallize in the monoclinic space group P2₁/c. In the crystal structure of (I), intermolecular O—H...N hydrogen bonds combine the molecules into polymeric chains extending along the c axis. The chains are linked by C—H...π interactions between the methylene H atoms and the pyridine rings into polymeric layers parallel to the ac plane. In the crystal structure of (II), the succinate anion lies on an inversion centre. Its carboxylate groups interact with the 2‐ethyl‐3‐hydroxy‐6‐methylpyridinium cations via intermolecular N—H...O hydrogen bonds with the pyridine ring H atoms and O—H...O hydrogen bonds with the hydroxy H atoms to form polymeric chains, which extend along the [01] direction and comprise R₄⁴(18) hydrogen‐bonded ring motifs. These chains are linked to form a three‐dimensional network through nonclassical C—H...O hydrogen bonds between the pyridine ring H atoms and the hydroxy‐group O atoms of neighbouring cations. π–π interactions between the pyridine rings and C—H...π interactions between the methylene H atoms of the succinate anion and the pyridine rings are also present in this network.     

3‐Hydro­xy‐6‐[(4‐hydroxy­phenyl­amino)­methyl­ene]­cyclo­hexa‐2,4‐dienone and 2‐hydroxy‐6‐[(4‐hydroxy­phenyl­amino)­methyl­ene]­cyclo­hexa‐2,4‐dienone

The title compounds, both C₁₃H₁₁NO₃, exist as the keto–amine tautomers, and the formal hydroxyl H atoms, which display strong intramolecular hydrogen bonds, are located on the N atoms. This is a verification of the preference for the keto–amine tautomeric form in the solid state. The 2‐hydroxy isomer has two independent mol­ecules, with the mol­ecules linked by intramolecular N—H⋯O and O—H⋯O and intermolecular O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds into three‐dimensional networks.     

Interplay between Metal⋅⋅⋅π Interactions and Hydrogen Bonds: Some Unusual Synergetic Effects of Coinage Metals and Substituents

The ternary systems of C₂H₄ (C₂H₂ or C₆H₆)‐MCN‐HF (M=Cu, Ag, Au) and the respective binary systems were investigated to study the interplay between metal???π interactions and hydrogen bonds. The metal???π interactions in C₂H₄‐MCN become stronger with the irregular order Ag<Cu<Au, while the hydrogen bonds in MCN‐HF become weaker following the same order. The metal???π interactions are weakened as the H atoms in the π system are replaced with electron‐withdrawing groups and enhanced by electron‐donating groups. Type 1 of these ternary systems, in which MCN acts as Lewis base and acid simultaneously, is more stable than type 2, in which C₂H₄ acts as a double Lewis base. Negative cooperativity is present in type 2 ternary systems with a weakening of the metal???π interactions and the hydrogen bonds. Positive cooperativity is found in type 1 ternary systems with an enhancement of the metal???π interactions and the hydrogen bonds, except for C₂(CN)₄‐AuCN‐HF‐1. The weaker metal???π interaction in C₆H₆‐AuCN has a greater enhancing effect on the hydrogen bond in AuCN‐HF than those in C₂H₄‐AuCN and C₂H₂‐AuCN. These synergetic effects were analyzed with the natural bond orbital and energy decomposition.     

Dipotassium aqua­penta­fluoro­vanadate

The title compound, K₂[VF₅(H₂O)], was synthesized from potassium antimony tartrate, piperazine, V₂O₅ and HF under hydro­thermal conditions. It is isostructural with K₂[FeF₅(H₂O)] and contains polymeric anion chains held together by strong O—H⋯F bonds. Each V atom is coordinated to five terminal F atoms and the O atom of one water mol­ecule. Pairs of O—H⋯F bonds are formed by two cis‐related F atoms. Twofold axes run along the O—V—F axis of the V‐centred otahedra.     

Molecular orbital theory of the hydrogen bond.: XVI. A comparative study of pyridine and the diazines as proton acceptors in ground and excited n → π* states

Ab initio LCAO MO SCF calculations with a minimal STO-3G basis set have been performed to determine the structures and energies of dimers having pyridazine, pyrimidine, and pyrazine as proton acceptor molecules, with HF and H₂O as proton donors. The structures of these dimers are consistent with structures anticipated from the General Hybridization Model. Differences in the relative stabilities of dimers in the two series which have HF and H₂O as proton donors and pyridine and the diazines as proton acceptors are attributed to different weightings of secondary effects which influence dimer stabilities. These azabenzeme molecules form stronger hydrogen bonds than HCN and weaker hydrogen bonds than NH₃ whether HF or H₂O is the proton donor. Configuration interaction calculations indicate that vertical excitation to n → π* states of these proton aceptor molecules results in various degrees of destabilization of hydrogen bonded dimers and trimers, depending upon the excited state electron densities at the nitrogen atoms and the excited state dipole moments. With respect to the proton acceptor molecule, computed blue shifts of the n → π* bands increase in the order pyrazine < pyradizine < pyrimidine < pyridine.     

Protonation products of pentaaminopentane as novel building blocks for hydrogen‐bonded networks

The structures of 3‐amino‐1,2R,4S,5‐tetra­ammoniopentane tetrachloride monohydrate, C₅H₂₁N₅⁴⁺·4Cl^?·H₂O, and 1,2R,3,4S,5‐penta­ammoniopentane tetra­chloro­zincate tri­chlor­ide monohydrate, (C₅H₂₂N₅)[ZnCl₄]Cl₃·H₂O, have been determined from single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction data. Both compounds show a complex network of N—H?O, O—H?Cl and N—H?Cl hydrogen bonds. There are a total of 14 H atoms of the tetra‐cation and 15 H atoms of the penta‐cation available for hydrogen bonding. However, due to the particular shape of the primary linear poly­ammonium cations, only a certain number of H atoms can be involved in hydrogen‐bond formation. It is further shown that hydrogen bonding has an influence on the conformation of such alkyl­ammonium cations.     

Three related benzoannelated diazapolyether macrocycles: effects of macrocycle ring size and position of benzo groups on hydrogen bonding of the amine H atoms

The benzoannelated diazapolyether macrocycles 6,7,9,10,17,18‐hexahydro‐5H,11H‐8,16,19‐trioxa‐5,11‐diazadibenzo[a,g]cyclopentadecene, C₁₈H₂₂N₂O₃, (I), 6,7,9,10,12,13,20,21‐octahydro‐5H,14H‐8,11,19,22‐tetraoxa‐5,14‐diazadibenzo[a,g]cyclooctadecene, C₂₀H₂₆N₂O₄, (II), and 6,7,9,10,17,18,20,21‐octahydro‐16H,22H‐5,8,11,19‐tetraoxa‐16,22‐diazadibenzo[a,j]cyclooctadecene 0.3‐hydrate, C₂₀H₂₆N₂O₄·0.304H₂O, (III), show different patterns of hydrogen bonding. In (I), the amine H atoms participate only in intramolecular hydrogen bonds with ether O atoms. In (II), the amine H atoms form intramolecular hydrogen bonds with the phenoxy ether O atoms and intermolecular hydrogen bonds with alkyl ether O atoms in an adjacent molecule, forming a chain linking the macrocycles together via an R₂²(10) motif. Molecules of (II) were found on a crystallographic twofold axis. In (III), the amine H atoms participate in a hydrogen‐bond network with adjacent ether O atoms and with a water molecule [having a partial occupancy of 0.304 (6)] that links the molecules together via a C₂²(7) motif.     

A whole zoo of hydrogen bonds in one crystal structure: tris(isonicotinium) hydrogensulfate sulfate monohydrate

Depending on the reaction partner, the organic ditopic molecule isonicotinic acid (Hina) can act either as a Brønsted acid or base. With sulfuric acid, the pyridine ring is protonated to become a pyridinium cation. Crystallization from ethanol affords the title compound tris(4‐carboxypyridinium) hydrogensulfate sulfate monohydrate, 3C₆H₆NO₂⁺·HSO₄⁻·SO₄²⁻·H₂O or [(H₂ina)₃(HSO₄)(SO₄)(H₂O)]. This solid contains 11 classical hydrogen bonds of very different flavour and nonclassical C—H…O contacts. All N—H and O—H donors find at least one acceptor within a suitable distance range, with one of the three pyridinium H atoms engaged in bifurcated N—H…O hydrogen bonds. The shortest hydrogen‐bonding O…O distance is subtended by hydrogensulfate and sulfate anions, viz. 2.4752 (19) Å, and represents one of the shortest hydrogen bonds ever reported between these residues.     

trans‐Di­aqua­bis(5‐carboxy‐1H‐imidazole‐4‐carboxyl­ato‐κ2N3,O4)­cobalt(II) 4,4′‐bi­pyridine solvate

In the title compound, [Co(C₅H₃N₂O₄)₂(H₂O)₂]·C₁₀H₈N₂, the Co atom is trans‐coordinated by two pairs of N and O atoms from two monoanionic 4,5‐di­carboxy­imidazole ligands, and by two O atoms from two coordinated water mol­ecules, in a distorted octahedral geometry. The 4,4′‐bi­pyridine solvent molecule is not involved in coordination but is linked by an N—H⋯N hydrogen bond to the neutral [Co(C₅H₃N₂O₄)₂(H₂O)₂] mol­ecule. Both mol­ecules are located on inversion centers. The crystal packing is stabilized by N—H⋯N and O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds, which produce a three‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded network. Offset π–π stacking interactions between the pyridine rings of adjacent 4,4′‐bi­pyridine molecules were observed, with a face‐to‐face distance of 3.345 (1) Å.     

4,8‐Di­methoxy‐1‐naphthalene­methanol

The title compound, C₁₃H₁₄O₃, crystallized in the centrosymmetric space group C2/c with one mol­ecule as the asymmetric unit. Each hydroxyl O atom is involved in hydrogen bonds with two other hydroxyl O atoms. The resulting chains of interactions propagate along [001]. In these interactions, the hydroxyl H atoms are disordered and the O?O distances are 2.648 (2) and 2.698 (2) Å. Two leading intermolecular C—H?O interactions have H?O distances of 2.80 and 2.84 Å and C—H?O angles of 136 and 144°; these interactions form chain and ring patterns. Taken together with the hydrogen bonds, they result in a three‐dimensional network.