New IUPAC (International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry) recommendations on the measurement of pH - background and essentials

The IUPAC Recommendations on pH (1985) have serious metrological deficiencies (recommendation of two pH scales and of several pH definitions and procedures to measure pH). Background and essential features of new recommendations, which replace the 1985 document, are reported in this paper. The new document is strictly based on metrological principles. pH is defined (notionally) by the negative logarithm of the hydrogen ion activity according to S?rensen and Linderstr?m-Lang (1924), that is pH=-lg a(H). Because pH is a single ion quantity it is immeasurable and is therefore experimentally verified, with stated uncertainties, by pH(PS) values of primary standard buffer solutions. The assignment of pH(PS) is carried out in a Harned cell (without transference), which is defined as a primary method of measurement, and involves the Bates-Guggenheim convention. pH(PS) is thus a conventional quantity. Consideration of the uncertainty of the Bates-Guggenhein convention, however, permits its incorporation into the internationally accepted SI system of measurement. Comparison of the pH of secondary buffer solutions with pH(PS) values in recommended cells with transference yields secondary standards, whose pH(SS) can be traced back to pH(PS) and consequently to the definition of pH. The traceability chain is continued "downwards" by practical cells with transference containing glass electrodes for the measurement of pH(X) values of unknown solutions, for which three calibration procedures are recommended. The measurement of pH is thus represented by the traceability chain pH(X)-->pH(SS)-->pH(PS)-->pH as defined, each step having stated uncertainties. This hierarchical system of measurement excludes any pH 'scale'. Tabulated pH(PS) values are given as examples, and it is recommended that actual pH(PS) and pH(SS) be taken from certificates, which are to accompany each lot of certified reference material (CRM). Target uncertainties and examples of their calculation, a sign convention for pH cells and conventions for presenting cell schemes are given in the new document.     

Metrological traceability chain for PCBs: I.N.Ri.M. activity

Metrology in chemistry has its own features, which distinguish it from classical metrology: due to the lack of primary methods applicable in routine measurements, metrological traceability of measurement results can be achieved by using in a proper way suitable certified reference materials (CRMs), which can assure a direct relation to a reference. This article deals with the activity of the Italian National Institute of Metrological Research (Istituto Nazionale di Ricerca Metrologica—I.N.Ri.M.) on the analysis of various polychlorinated biphenyls congeners in organic solution by means of gas-chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry. The metrological traceability approach in the quantification step is pursued via calibration solutions prepared by gravimetrically diluting a CRM. The uncertainty for the calibration solutions was evaluated taking into account all the relevant contributions.     

The use of certified reference materials in the Romanian traceability scheme

 For ensuring the traceability and uniformity of measurement results, the main objectives of national metrology programmes in chemistry are to calibrate and verify measuring instruments, to evaluate the uncertainty of measurement results and to intercompare the analytical results, etc. The concept of traceability has developed recently in chemical measurements, thus, an attempt to implement the principles of metrological traceability especially by appropriateness calibration using composition certified reference materials (CRMs) is underlined. Interlaboratory comparisons are also a useful response to the need for comparable results. The paper presents some aspects and practices in the field of spectrometric measurement regarding the metrological quality of the traceability by calibrating the instruments using suitable and reliable CRMs. The uncertainty of results, as a measure of the reliability that can be placed on them, has been adequately described in different documents and, as a consequence, some examples of evaluating the measurement uncertainty are described. The relationship between uncertainty and traceability, as two fundamental concepts of metrology which are intimately linked, is underlined. Received: 12 November 1999 / Accepted: 10 December 1999     

Metrological traceability is not always a straight line

The two most important concepts in metrology are certainly “traceability to standards” and “measurement uncertainty evaluation”. So far the questions related to these concepts have been reasonably solved in the metrology of “classical quantities”, but for the introduction of metrological concepts in new fields, such as chemistry and biology, a lot of problems remain and must be solved in order to support international arrangements. In this presentation, the authors want to develop the strategy implemented at Laboratoire national de métrologie et d’essais (LNE) in metrology in chemistry and biology. The strategy is based on: (1) pure solutions for calibration of analytical instruments, (2) use of certified reference materials (matrix reference materials), and (3) participation to proficiency testing schemes. Examples will be presented in organic and inorganic chemistry. For laboratory medicine, proficiency testing providers play an important role in the organization of External Quality Assessment Schemes. For the time being, the reference value or the assigned value of the comparison is calculated with the results obtained by the participants. This assigned value is not often traceable to SI units. One of the methods suggested by LNE is to ensure the metrological traceability to SI units of the assigned value for the more critical quantities carried on analytes by implementing the Joint committee for traceability in laboratory medicine reference methods.     

Investigating out-of-specification test results of chemical composition based on metrological concepts

A metrological background for investigating out-of-specification (OOS) test results of chemical composition is discussed. When an OOS test result is identified, it is important to determine its root causes and to avoid reoccurrence of such results. An investigation of the root causes based on metrological concepts would be beneficial. It includes (1) assessment of validation data of the measurement process, (2) evaluation of the measurement uncertainty contributions, and (3) assessment of metrological traceability chains critical for measurement parameters and environmental conditions influencing the test results. The questions, how can the validation data be applied for this investigation, and how can measurement uncertainty contributions and/or metrological traceability chains change a probability of OOS test results, are analyzed.     

The history and development of a rigorous metrological basis for pH measurements

This paper discusses the basis and historical development of the traceability chain for pH. The quantity pH, first introduced in 1909, is among the most frequently measured analytical quantities. The practical measurement of the pH value of a sample is inexpensive, easy to perform, and yields a rapid result. However, the problems posed by the traceability of pH are not easy to solve. Most pH measurements are performed by potentiometry, using a glass electrode as the pH sensor. Such pH electrodes must be calibrated at regular intervals. Confidence in the reliability of pH measurements requires establishment of a metrological hierarchy including an uncertainty budget for calibration that links the pH measured in the sample to an internationally agreed and stated reference. For pH, this reference is the primary measurement of pH. A traceability chain can be established that links field measurements of pH to primary buffer solutions that are certified using this primary method. This allows the user in the field to estimate the measurement uncertainty of the measured pH data. As the realization of the primary measurement is sophisticated and time-consuming, primary standards are generally realized at national metrology institutes. A number of potentiometric methods are suitable for the determination of the pH of reference buffer solutions by comparison with the primary standard buffers. The choice between the methods should be made according to the uncertainty required for the application. For reference buffer solutions that have the same nominal composition as the primary standard, the differential potentiometric cell, often called the Baucke cell, is recommended.     

Evaluation of Accuracy of Electrochemical Isoflavonoid Index for the Determination of Total Isoflavones in Soy Samples

The accuracy of a novel electroanalytical route to determine total isoflavones using a secondary standard from Drug Master File (SW/1211/03) as metrological reference with well‐known traceability and its applicability using representative soy samples is demonstrated. Calibration protocols were used i) for choosing a suitable isoflavone standard to determine the total isoflavone content, ii) to evaluate matrix effects and, iii) to evaluate the overall reliability and performance of the method in analytical operations, extraction and analysis. The inherent electroactivity of both, aglycones and glycoside structures and the similar analytical sensitivity exhibited by the prominent soy isoflavones was relevant to determine the total amount with reliability in terms of accuracy (E<10%) and precision (RSDs<7%) in soy samples. In consequence, the introduction of the term isoflavonoid index as the total amount of isoflavones obtained when they are amperometrically monitorized at +1.0 V as a particular case of the electrochemical index concept is proposed.     

Neutron activation analysis: A primary method of measurement

Neutron activation analysis (NAA), based on the comparator method, has the potential to fulfill the requirements of a primary ratio method as defined in 1998 by the Comité Consultatif pour la Quantité de Matière — Métrologie en Chimie (CCQM, Consultative Committee on Amount of Substance — Metrology in Chemistry). This thesis is evidenced in this paper in three chapters by: demonstration that the method is fully physically and chemically understood; that a measurement equation can be written down in which the values of all parameters have dimensions in SI units and thus having the potential for metrological traceability to these units; that all contributions to uncertainty of measurement can be quantitatively evaluated, underpinning the metrological traceability; and that the performance of NAA in CCQM key-comparisons of trace elements in complex matrices between 2000 and 2007 is similar to the performance of Isotope Dilution Mass Spectrometry (IDMS), which had been formerly designated by the CCQM as a primary ratio method.     

Extended traceability of pH: an evaluation of the role of Pitzer's equations

The 2002 IUPAC recommendation on pH (provisional) has taken its own philosophy to provide a basis for comparable and traceable assignment of a value, from a measurement, to the quantity pH. Whereas the substituted 1983 IUPAC recommendation relied heavily on precisely prescribed experimental techniques and procedures, the current recommendation defines a hierarchical relationship between references for comparison (primary and secondary standards) and objective criteria on the comparison of measurements with these standards. The recommendation aims at a traceability chain from the national metrological institution (NMI) level down to field and laboratory measurements. Currently, however, the traceability chain is developed to the level of certified reference materials (CRM), namely the above mentioned primary and secondary standards. To complete the traceability chain, several theoretical and practical aspects have to be pondered. In part, the methods for comparative assessment of different options have yet to be developed. As an illustrating example of the complexity of issues to be considered in a further extension of the traceability chain is estimation of the doubt associated with Pitzer coefficients. The Pitzer equations for activity coefficient modelling are explicitly mentioned in the 2002 IUPAC recommendation on pH (provisional) as enabling possible improvement in the ionic strength extrapolations to zero ionic strength. An assessment of uncertainty of ternary Pitzer coefficients is given for the first time.     

Derived measurement standards of reduced uncertainty – A contradiction?

 If the value of a derived measurement standard is assigned by comparison with a reference standard of the same quantity, the uncertainty is increased by the additional uncertainty on the difference measurement. This basic fact has lead to the general belief that the uncertainty of derived standards is always larger than that of the reference standards. However, if the value of a derived standard is assigned by comparison with several independent reference standards using an appropriate average, the increase of uncertainty due to the uncertainty on difference measurement may be counterbalanced by the the well-known decrease of uncertainty through averaging. The gain of accuracy made possible by this mechanism is restricted to second-generation standards. Further gain through iteration is prevented by correlation between standards derived from the same set of reference standards. As a consequence, the concept of metrological hierarchy levels, relating to traceability chains, becomes questionable for traceability networks.     

The practical realization of the traceability of chemical measurements standards

Metrology is based on the concept of traceability. Traceability provides a means of relating measurement results to common standards thereby helping to ensure that measurements made in different laboratories are comparable. Good progress has been made in the application of metrological principles to chemical measurement, but there remains confusion about how you actually achieve traceability in a practical way. This paper elaborates on the meaning and application of much used phrases such as 'the value of a standard', 'stated references', 'unbroken chain of comparisons', and 'stated uncertainties'. It also explains how traceability can be established in a practical way for different types of stated references, namely pure substance reference materials, matrix reference materials, and primary and reference methods. Finally, traceability chains for some typical examples of chemical measurement are described.     

From total allowable error via metrological traceability to uncertainty of measurement of the unbiased result

The concept of "total allowable error", investigated by Westgard and co-workers over a quarter of a century for use in laboratory medicine, comprises bias as well as random elements. Yet, to minimize diagnostic misclassifications, it is necessary to have spatio-temporal comparability of results. This requires trueness obtained through metrological traceability based on a calibration hierarchy. Hereby, the result is associated with a final uncertainty of measurement purged of known biases of procedure and laboratory. The sources of bias are discussed and the importance of commutability of calibrators and analytical specificity of the measurement procedure is stressed. The practicability of traceability to various levels and the advantages of the GUM approach for estimating uncertainty are shown.     

Presentation of differential laser-induced fluorimetry as a reference measurement procedure for determination of total uranium content in ores and similar matrices

The metrological principle of ‘differential technique in laser-induced fluorimetry’ analysis is discussed and recommended as a reference measurement procedure for determination of total uranium content in ores and similar matrices. The estimated relative expanded uncertainty values obtained for uranium content in standard IAEA samples are, S 1, 0.04 g/kg, S 2, 0.06 g/kg, S 3, 0.04 g/kg, and for S 4, 0.10 g/kg, respectively. These low uncertainty values obtained for uranium show high metrological quality of differential technique. This reference measurement procedure guarantees the quality of an analytical result (accuracy, high precision, reliability, comparability, and traceability). Laser-induced fluorimetry will be useful for the analysis of uranium in ores, certification of reference materials, borehole core assay, and other diverse applications in nuclear fuel cycle. Differential technique in spectrophotometry/laser fluorimetry has inherent high metrological quality. In principle, laser-induced fluorimetry is an ideal technique for the very accurate determination of uranium by the use of appropriate fluorescence-enhancing reagents and methodology depending upon the concentration of uranium and sample matrices.     

The practical realization of the traceability of chemical measurements standards

 Metrology is based on the concept of traceability. Traceability provides a means of relating measurement results to common standards thereby helping to ensure that measurements made in different laboratories are comparable. Good progress has been made in the application of metrological principles to chemical measurement, but there remains confusion about how you actually achieve traceability in a practical way.

This paper elaborates on the meaning and application of much used phrases such as 'the value of a standard', 'stated references', 'unbroken chain of comparisons', and 'stated uncertainties'. It also explains how traceability can be established in a practical way for different types of stated references, namely pure substance reference materials, matrix reference materials, and primary and reference methods. Finally, traceability chains for some typical examples of chemical measurement are described.

     

Towards future reference systems for GM analysis

Despite the fact that the measurement unit for the quantification of GMOs in food and feed products has not yet been unambiguously agreed upon in Europe, international trade requires reliable GMO analysis measuring comparably the GMO content of products. The two reference systems, based either on mass fractions or on copy number ratios, and their metrological traceability chains are presented and discussed. It is concluded that, properly established and expressed, measurement results in copy number ratios can provide a metrologically sound reference system. In this case, certified reference materials used for calibration and quality control can be independent of each other and the uncertainty derived from calibration can correctly be included in the overall uncertainty of the GMO measurement. However, further efforts are required to establish this metrological system.     

Reference materials and certified reference materials for spectrometry in Romania

Several reference materials (RMs) and certified reference materials (CRMs) are widely used in Romania as measurement standards in different spectrochemical measurements. Among them, single element standard solution certified for their mass concentration play a key role in ensuring the required traceability of results expressed in this measurement unit. A short review of the locally available elemental RMs and CRMs used in atomic spectrometry or in other analytical techniques where aqueous standard solutions are required (usually called RMs or CRMs for spectrometry) is given. The experience of the INM in preparation and certification of such materials is described. Some aspects regarding their use for ensuring the accuracy and for confirmation of the traceability of analytical measurements, especially through calibration and metrological validation of main instrument performances, are discussed.     

The Japanese traceability system and the role of uncertainty evaluation in measurement

 The new traceability system of measurement standards based on the Japanese Measurement Law has been established since November 1993. Some reference materials such as metal standard solutions, pH standard solutions and standard gas mixtures are included in the system together with relevant physical quantities. In this system, primary measurement standard instruments or primary reference materials are designated by the regulation for each quantity. For the practical dissemination of each quantity, accreditation of calibration bodies is recognized by the steering committee under the supervision of the government. In the course of assessment of a candidate calibration body, the concepts of ISO/IEC Guide 25 and ISO/IEC Guide 58 are effectively introduced. For the estimation of reliability, the concept of how to introduce the statistical approach is effectively considered. The method of uncertainty evaluation described in the ISO document entitled "Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement" is adopted.     

Reference materials and certified reference materials for spectrometry in Romania

Several reference materials (RMs) and certified reference materials (CRMs) are widely used in Romania as measurement standards in different spectrochemical measurements. Among them, single element standard solution certified for their mass concentration play a key role in ensuring the required traceability of results expressed in this measurement unit. A short review of the locally available elemental RMs and CRMs used in atomic spectrometry or in other analytical techniques where aqueous standard solutions are required (usually called RMs or CRMs for spectrometry) is given. The experience of the INM in preparation and certification of such materials is described. Some aspects regarding their use for ensuring the accuracy and for confirmation of the traceability of analytical measurements, especially through calibration and metrological validation of main instrument performances, are discussed.     

A national traceability system for chemical measurements

Current developments in Germany for establishing a traceability system for chemical measurements are reported. The focus is on a dissemination mechanism which employs chemical calibration laboratories accredited within the framework of the German Calibration Service (DKD) and acting as "multipliers" between the national standards level and the user level by providing the user with calibration means which are traceable to the SI via national standards. At the national standards level, a network of high-level chemistry institutes coordinated by the national metrology institute, PTB, provides the primary references for chemical measurements.The use of the metrological dissemination system provided by the DKD also for chemical measurements is a logical extension of a traceability mechanism, successful for more than two decades in general metrology, to metrology in chemistry. In detail, traceability structures in clinical chemistry, electrochemistry, elemental analysis and gas analysis are described. This system has become an important part of the efforts made in Germany to support chemical laboratories in meeting the traceability requirements of the market and of legal regulations.