Existence globale pour une classe d'équations d'ondes perturbées

In this paper we prove a global well-posedness result for the following Cauchy problem:

where the initial data $\text{(f,g)∈}\text{H}\text{?}{}^1\text{(}\text{R}{}^3\text{)×L}{}^2\text{(}\text{R}{}^3\text{)}$ are compactly supported, 1?α<5, $\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(t,x)∈L}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{(}\text{R}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{×}\text{R}{}_{\mathrm{x}}{}^3\text{)}$, $\text{V(t,x)∈L}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{(}\text{R}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{;L}{}^3\text{(}\text{R}{}^3{}_{\mathrm{x}}\text{))}$. To cite this article: N. Visciglia, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. I 338 (2004).     

Trajectories joining critical points of nonlinear parabolic and hyperbolic partial differential equations

Consider the following nonlinear Dirichlet boundary value problems:

$\text{D}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{u(t,x)=Lu(t,x)+f(u(t,x)),}\text{t?0,x∈Ω}\text{u(t,x)=0,}\text{t?0,x∈?Ω}$

(1.1)

$\text{D}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{D}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{u(t,x)=Lu(t,x)+}\text{α}\text{L(D}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{u(t,x))+f(u(t,x)),}\text{α}\text{>0,t?0,x∈Ω}\text{u(t,x)=0,}\text{t?0,x∈?Ω}$

(1.2)

$\text{Lu(x)+f(u(x)),}\text{x∈Ω}\text{u(x)=0,}\text{x∈?Ω}$

. (1.3) In all of these equations, f: R → R is a locally Lipschitzian asymptotically linear function with positive asymptotic slope, f(0) = 0, and L is a self-adjoint, negativedefinite and strongly elliptic second-order differential operator on a smooth domain Ω in Rⁿ. The solutions of (1.1) and (1.2) generate semiflows which are not pointdissipative and whose equilibria are determined by solutions of (1.3). In this paper, using an extension (due to the present author) of Conley's Morse index theory to noncompact spaces, we prove not only the existence of positive solutions of (1.3) (a result shown earlier by Peitgen and Schmitt using different methods), but also show the existence of (nonconstant) heteroclinic orbits of (1.1) and (1.2) joining two sets of equilibria.     

Diffusion with interactions between two types of particles and Pressureless gas equations

We construct two d-dimensional independent diffusions $\text{X}{}_{\mathrm{t}}{}^{\mathrm{a}}\text{=a+∫}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{t}}\text{u(X}{}_{\mathrm{s}}{}^{\mathrm{a}}\text{,s)}\text{d}\text{s+νB}{}_{\mathrm{t}}{}^{\mathrm{a}}\text{,}\text{X}{}_{\mathrm{t}}{}^{\mathrm{b}}\text{=b+∫}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{t}}\text{u(X}{}_{\mathrm{s}}{}^{\mathrm{b}}\text{,s)}\text{d}\text{s+νB}{}_{\mathrm{t}}{}^{\mathrm{b}}$, with the same viscosity ν≠0 and the same drift u(x,t)=(pρ_t^a(x)v₁+(1?p)ρ_t^b(x)v₂)/(pρ_t^a(x)+(1?p)ρ_t^b(x)), where ρ_t^a,ρ_t^b are respectively the density of X_t^a and X_t^b. Here $\text{a,b,v}{}_1\text{,v}{}_2\text{∈}\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{d}}$ and p∈(0,1) are given. We show that $\text{(ρ}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{(x)=pρ}{}_{\mathrm{t}}{}^{\mathrm{a}}\text{(x)+(1?p)ρ}{}_{\mathrm{t}}{}^{\mathrm{b}}\text{(x),u(x,t):}\text{t?0,}\text{x∈}\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{d}}\text{)}$ is the unique weak solution of the following pressureless gas system

such that $\text{ρ}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{(x)}\text{d}\text{x→pδ}{}_{\mathrm{a}}\text{+(1?p)δ}{}_{\mathrm{b}}\text{,}\text{u(x,t)ρ}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{(x)}\text{d}\text{x→pv}{}_1\text{δ}{}_{\mathrm{a}}\text{+(1?p)v}{}_2\text{δ}{}_{\mathrm{b}}$ as t→0+. To cite this article: A. Dermoune, S. Filali, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. I 337 (2003).     

Generic hyperbolicity for the equilibria of the one-dimensional parabolic equation ut=(a(x)ux)x+f(u)

We show, for some classes of diffusion coefficients that, generically in f, all equilibria of the reaction–diffusion equation$\text{u}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{=(a(x)u}{}_{\mathrm{x}}\text{)}{}_{\mathrm{x}}\text{+f(u),}\text{0<x<1}$with homogeneous Neumann boundary conditions are hyperbolic.     

Sublinear perturbations of the differential equation y(n) = 0 and of the analogous difference equation

According to a result of A. Ghizzetti, for any solution y(t) of the differential equation where $\text{y}{}^{\mathrm{(n)}}\text{(t)+}\text{∑}\text{i=0}\text{n?1}\text{g}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(t) y}{}^{\mathrm{i}}\text{(t)=0}\text{(t ? 1)}$, $\text{∝}{}_1{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{¦g}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(x)¦x}{}^{\mathrm{n?I?1}}\text{dx < ∞}$ (0 ?i ? n ?1, either y(t) = 0 for t ? 1 or there is an integer r with 0 ? r ? n ? 1 such that $\text{lim}\text{t → ∞}\text{y(t)}\text{t}{}^{\mathrm{r}}$ exists and ≠0. Related results are obtained for difference and differential inequalities. A special case of the former has interesting applications in the study of orthogonal polynomials.     

A linearized compact difference scheme for an one-dimensional parabolic inverse problem

The parabolic equation with the control parameter is a class of parabolic inverse problems and is nonlinear. While determining the solution of the problems, we shall determinate some unknown control parameter. These problems play a very important role in many branches of science and engineering. The article is devoted to the following parabolic initial-boundary value problem with the control parameter: ∂u/∂t=∂²u/∂x²+p(t)u+?(x,t),0<x<1,0<t?T$\mathrm{\partial }u/\mathrm{\partial }t={\mathrm{\partial }}^{2}u/\mathrm{\partial }{x}^2+p(t)u+?(x\text{,}t)\text{,}0<x<1\text{,}0<t?T$ satisfying u(x,0)=f(x),0<x<1$u(x\text{,}0)=f(x)\text{,}0<x<1$; u(0,t)=_g0(t)$u(0\text{,}t)=g_0(t)$, u(1,t)=_g1(t)$u(1\text{,}t)=g_1(t)$, u(x^∗,t)=E(t),0?t?T$u(x^{\ast }\text{,}t)=E(t)\text{,}0?t?T$ where ?(x,t),f(x),_g0(t),_g1(t)$?(x\text{,}t)\text{,}f(x)\text{,}{g}_0(t)\text{,}{g}_1(t)$ and E(t)$E(t)$ are known functions, u(x,t)$u(x\text{,}t)$ and p(t)$p(t)$ are unknown functions. A linearized compact difference scheme is constructed. The discretization accuracy of the difference scheme is two order in time and four order in space. The solvability of the difference scheme is proved. Some numerical results and comparisons with the difference scheme given by Dehghan are presented. The numerical results show that the linearized difference scheme of this article improve the accuracy of the space and time direction and shorten computation time largely. The method in this article is also applicable to the two-dimensional inverse problem.