Universal bounds for global solutions of a forced porous medium equation

We show that in a smooth bounded domain $\text{Ω⊂}\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$, n⩾2, all global nonnegative solutions of u_t−Δu^m=u^p with zero boundary data are uniformly bounded in $\text{Ω×(τ,∞)}$ by a constant depending on $\text{Ω,p}$ and τ but not on u₀, provided that 1<m<p<[(n+1)/(n−1)]m. Furthermore, we prove an a priori bound in $\text{L}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{(Ω×(0,∞))}$ depending on $\text{||u}{}_0\text{||}{}_{\mathrm{L\infty (\Omega )}}$ under the optimal condition 1<m<p<[(n+2)/(n−2)]m.     

Operator properties of Sobolev imbeddings over unbounded domains

For an open set Ω ? $\text{R}$^N, 1 ? p ? ∞ and λ ∈ $\text{R}$⁺, let $\text{W}\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{p}}{}^{\mathrm{\lambda }}\text{(Ω)}$ denote the Sobolev-Slobodetzkij space obtained by completing $\text{C}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{(Ω)}$ in the usual Sobolev-Slobodetzkij norm (cf. A. Pietsch, “r-nukleare Sobol. Einbett. Oper., Ellipt. Dgln. II,” Akademie-Verlag, Berlin, 1971, pp. 203–215). Choose a Banach ideal of operators $\text{U}$, 1 ? p, q ? ∞ and a quasibounded domain Ω ? $\text{R}$^N. Theorem 1 of the note gives sufficient conditions on λ such that the Sobolev-imbedding map $\text{W}\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{p}}{}^{\mathrm{\lambda }}\text{(Ω) λ L}{}_{\mathrm{q}}\text{(Ω)}$ exists and belongs to the given Banach ideal $\text{U}$: Assume the quasibounded domain fulfills condition C_k^l for some l > 0 and 1 ? k ? N. Roughly this means that the distance of any $\text{x ? Ω}$ to the boundary ?Ω tends to zero as $\text{O(¦ x ¦}{}^{\mathrm{?l}}\text{)}$ for $\text{¦ x ¦ → ∞}$, and that the boundary consists of sufficiently smooth ?(N ? k)-dimensional manifolds. Take, furthermore, 1 ? p, q ? ∞, p > k. Then, if μ, ν are real positive numbers with λ = μ + v ∈ $\text{N}$, μ > λ _S($\text{U}$; p,q:N) and v > N/l · λ_D($\text{U}$;p,q), one has that $\text{W}\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{p}}{}^{\mathrm{\lambda }}\text{(Ω) λ L}{}_{\mathrm{q}}\text{(Ω)}$ belongs to the Banach ideal $\text{U}$. Here λ_D($\text{U}$;p,q;N)∈$\text{R}$⁺ and λ_S($\text{U}$;p,q;N)∈$\text{R}$⁺ are the D-limit order and S-limit order of the ideal $\text{U}$, introduced by Pietsch in the above mentioned paper. These limit orders may be computed by estimating the ideal norms of the identity mappings l_pⁿ → l_qⁿ for n → ∞. Theorem 1 in this way generalizes results of R. A. Adams and C. Clark for the ideals of compact resp. Hilbert-Schmidt operators (p = q = 2) as well as results on imbeddings over bounded domains.Similar results over general unbounded domains are indicated for weighted Sobolev spaces.As an application, in Theorem 2 an estimate is given for the rate of growth of the eigenvalues of formally selfadjoint, uniformly strongly elliptic differential operators with Dirichlet boundary conditions in $\text{L}{}_2\text{(Ω)}$, where Ω fulfills condition C₁^l.For an open set Ω in $\text{R}$^N, let $\text{W}\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{p}}{}^{\mathrm{\lambda }}\text{(Ω)}$ denote the Sobolev-Slobodetzkij space obtained by completing $\text{C}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{(Ω)}$ in the usual Sobolev-Slobodetzkij norm, see below. Taking a fixed Banach ideal of operators and 1 ? p, q ? ∞, we consider quasibounded domains Ω in $\text{R}$^N and give sufficient conditions on λ such that the Sobolev imbedding operator $\text{W}\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{p}}{}^{\mathrm{\lambda }}\text{(Ω) λ L}{}_{\mathrm{q}}\text{(Ω)}$ exists and belongs to the Banach ideal. This generalizes results of C. Clark and R. A. Adams for compact, respectively, Hilbert-Schmidt operators (p = q = 2) to general Banach ideals of operators, as well as results on imbeddings over bounded domains. Similar results over general unbounded domains may be proved for weighted Sobolev spaces. As an application, we give an estimate for the rate of growth of the eigenvalues of formally selfadjoint, uniformly strongly elliptic differential operators with Dirichlet boundary conditions in $\text{L}{}_2\text{(Ω)}$, where Ω is a quasibounded open set in $\text{R}$^N.     

The virial theorem in relativistic quantum mechanics

For a class of potentials including the Coulomb potential q = μr^?1 with ¦ μ ¦ < 1 (1) (i.e., atomic numbers Z ? 137), the virial theorem $\text{(u, α ·}\text{p}\text{u) = (u, r(}\text{?q}\text{?r}\text{)u)}$ is shown to hold, u being an eigenfunction of the operator

$\text{Hu = TU : = (α ·}\text{p}\text{+ β + q)u}$

,

$\text{D(H) = {u ¦ u ∈ [H}{}_{\mathrm{loc}}{}^1\text{(}\text{R}\text{+}{}^3\text{)]}{}^4\text{, r}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>?</mtext><mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{u, TU ∈ [L}{}^2\text{(R)}{}^3\text{]}{}^4\text{}}$

($\text{R}$₊³ := $\text{R}$?{0}). The result implies in particular that H with (1) does not have any eigenvalues embedded in the continuum. The proof uses a scale transformation.     

Approximation numbers of Sobolev imbeddings over unbounded domains

Let Ω ? $\text{R}$^N be an open set with $\text{dist}\text{(x, ?Ω) = O(¦ x ¦}{}^{\mathrm{?l}}\text{)}\text{for}\text{x ? Ω}$ and some l > 0 satisfying an additional regularity condition. We give asymptotic estimates for the approximation numbers α_n of Sobolev imbeddings

over these quasibounded domains Ω. Here

denotes the Sobolev space obtained by completing $\text{C}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{staggered\infty }}\text{(Ω)}$ under the usual Sobolev norm. We prove $\text{α}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{(I}{}_{\mathrm{p,q}}{}^{\mathrm{m}}\text{)}\text{\$}\text{?}\text{n}{}^{\mathrm{?\gamma }}$, where

. There are quasibounded domains of this type where γ is the exact order of decay, in the case p ? q under the additional assumption that either 1 ? p ? q ? 2 or 2 ? p ? q ? ∞. This generalizes the known results for bounded domains which correspond to l = ∞. Similar results are indicated for the Kolmogorov and Gelfand numbers of I_p,q^m. As an application we give the rate of growth of the eigenvalues of certain elliptic differential operators with Dirichlet boundary conditions in $\text{L}{}_2\text{(Ω)}$, where Ω is a quasibounded domain of the above type.     

A characterization of first order nonlinear partial differential operators on Sobolev spaces

Nonlinear partial differential operators $\text{G: W}{}^{\mathrm{1,p}}\text{(Ω) → L}{}^{\mathrm{q}}\text{(Ω) (1 ? p, q ∞)}$ having the form G(u) = g(u, D₁u,…, D_Nu), with g?C(R × R_N), are here shown to be precisely those operators which are local, (locally) uniformly continuous on, $\text{W}{}^{\mathrm{1,\infty }}\text{(Ω)}$, and (roughly speaking) translation invariant. It is also shown that all such partial differential operators are necessarily bounded and continuous with respect to the norm topologies of $\text{W}{}^{\mathrm{1,p}}\text{(Ω)}\text{and}\text{L}{}^{\mathrm{q}}\text{(Ω)}$.     

The sum of aΩ(n) over integers n ≤ x with all prime factors between a and y

For a > 0 let $\text{ψ}{}_{\mathrm{a}}\text{(x, y) =}\text{Σ}\text{a}{}^{\mathrm{\Omega (n)}}$, the sum taken over all n, 1 ≤ n ≤ x such that if p is prime and p|n then a < p ≤ y. It is shown for u < about ($\text{log log}\text{x}\text{log log log}\text{x}$) that $\text{ψ}{}_{\mathrm{a}}\text{(x, x}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>u</mtext>}}\text{) ? x(}\text{log}\text{x)}{}^{\mathrm{a?1}}\text{p}{}_{\mathrm{a}}\text{(u)}$, where p_a(u) solves a delay differential equation much like that for the Dickman function p(u), and the asymptotic behavior of p_a(u) is worked out.     

The resolvent of a singularly perturbed elliptic operator

Let A and B be uniformly elliptic operators of orders 2m and 2n, respectively, m > n. We consider the Dirichlet problems for the equations (?^{2(m ? n)}A + B + λ²ⁿI)u_? = f and (B + λ²ⁿI)u = f in a bounded domain Ω in R^k with a smooth boundary ?Ω. The estimate is derived. This result extends the results of [7, 9, 10, 12, 14, 15, 18]by giving estimates up to the boundary, improving the rate of convergence in ?, using lower norms, and considering operators of higher order with variable coefficients. An application to a parabolic boundary value problem is given.     

Sur l'équation divu=fOn the equation divu=f

The main result is the following. Let $\text{Ω}$ be a bounded Lipschitz domain in $\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{d}}$, d?2. Then for every $\text{f∈}\text{L}{}^{\mathrm{d}}\text{(Ω)}$ with ∫f=0, there exists a solution $\text{u∈}\text{C}{}^0\text{(}\text{Ω}\text{)∩}\text{W}{}^{\mathrm{1,d}}\text{(Ω)}$ of the equation divu=f in $\text{Ω}$, satisfying in addition u=0 on $\text{?Ω}$ and the estimate

where C depends only on $\text{Ω}$. However one cannot choose u depending linearly on f. To cite this article: J. Bourgain, H. Brezis, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. I 334 (2002) 973–976.     

Nonlinear “double porosity” type modelUn modèle non linéaire de type double porosité

We consider a variational problem in a bounded domain $\text{Ω=}\text{F}{}^{\mathrm{(\epsilon )}}\text{∪}\text{M}{}^{\mathrm{(\epsilon )}}$ with a microstructure $\text{F}{}^{\mathrm{(\epsilon )}}$ which is not in general periodic; a^ε=a^ε(x) is of order 1 in $\text{F}{}^{\mathrm{(\epsilon )}}$ and as ε→0. A homogenized model is constructed. To cite this article: L. Pankratov, A. Piatnitski, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. I 334 (2002) 435–440.     

A divided difference inequality for n-convex functions

For a₍₁₎ ? a₍₂₎ ? ··· ? a_(n) ? 0, b₍₁₎ ? b₍₂₎ ? ··· ? b_(n) ? 0, the ordered values of a_i, b_i, i = 1, 2,…, n, m fixed, m ? n, and p ? 1 it is shown that

$\text{∑}\text{1}\text{n}\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{b}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{?}\text{∑}\text{1}\text{m}\text{a}{}^{\mathrm{p}}{}_{\mathrm{(i)}}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>p</mtext>}}\text{∑}\text{1}\text{m?k?1}\text{b}{}^{\mathrm{q}}{}_{\mathrm{(i)}}\text{+}\text{b}{}^{\mathrm{q}}{}_{\mathrm{[m?k]}}\text{(k+1)}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>q</mtext><mtext>p</mtext>}}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>q</mtext>}}$

where $\text{1}\text{p}\text{+}\text{1}\text{q}\text{= 1, b}{}_{\mathrm{[j]}}\text{= b}{}_{\mathrm{(j)}}\text{+ b}{}_{\mathrm{(j\; +\; 1)}}\text{+ ··· + b}{}_{\mathrm{(n)}}\text{,}\text{and}\text{k}$ is the integer such that $\text{b}{}_{\mathrm{(m\; ?\; k\; ?\; 1)}}\text{?}\text{b[m ? k]}\text{(k + 1)}$ and $\text{b}{}_{\mathrm{(m\; ?\; k)}}\text{<}\text{b}{}_{\mathrm{[m\; ?\; k\; +\; 1]}}\text{k}$. The inequality is shown to be sharp. When p < 1 and a_(i)'s are in increasing order then the inequality is reversed.     

W1,p-quasiconvexity and variational problems for multiple integrals

Variational problems for the multiple integral $\text{I}{}_{\mathrm{\Omega }}\text{(u) = ∝}{}_{\mathrm{\Omega }}\text{g(▽u(x))dx}$, where $\text{Ω?R}{}^{\mathrm{m}}$ and $\text{u:Ω→R}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$ are studied. A new condition on g, called W^1,p-quasiconvexity is introduced which generalizes in a natural way the quasiconvexity condition of C. B. Morrey, it being shown in particular to be necessary for sequential weak lower semicontinuity of $\text{I}{}_{\mathrm{\Omega }}$ in $\text{W}{}^{\mathrm{1,p}}\text{(Ω;R}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{)}$ and for the existence of minimizers for certain related integrals. Counterexamples are given concerning the weak continuity properties of Jacobians in $\text{W}{}^{\mathrm{1,p}}\text{(Ω;R}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{)}$, p ? n = m. An existence theorem for nonlinear elastostatics is proved under optimal growth hypotheses.     

On Lp estimates for the wave equation

New and more elementary proofs are given of two results due to W. Littman: (1) Let $\text{n ? 2, p ?}\text{2n}\text{(n ? 1)}$. The estimate $\text{∫∫ (¦▽u¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{+ ¦u}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{) dx dt ? C ∫∫ ¦□u¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{dx dt}$ cannot hold for all u?C₀^∞(Q), Q a cube in $\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{<mi\; mathvariant="italic"\; is="true">n</mi>}}\text{× R}$, some constant C. (2) Let n ? 2, p ≠ 2. The estimate $\text{∫ (¦▽(t)¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{+ ¦u}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{(t)¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{) dx ? C(t) ∫ (¦▽u(0)¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{+ ¦u}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{(0)¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{) dx}$ cannot hold for all C^∞ solutions of the wave equation □u = 0 in $\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{x R}$; all t ?$\text{R}$; some function C: $\text{R}$ → $\text{R}$.     

Superexponential decay of solutions of a semilinear wave equation

Consider a smooth solution of $\text{u}{}_{\mathrm{tt}}\text{? Δu + q(x) ¦ u ¦}{}^{\mathrm{p?1}}\text{u = 0 x ? R}{}^3\text{, q ? 0}$ and is C¹, and 1 < p < 5. Assume that the initial data decay sufficiently rapidly at infinity, $\text{q(x) ? a}\text{exp}\text{(?b ¦ x ¦}{}^{\mathrm{c}}\text{), a, b > 0, c > 1}$, and for simplicity, q_r ? 0. Then the local energy decays faster than exponentially.     

On the closability of some positive definite symmetric differential forms on c0∞(ω)

Let $\text{S}$ be a Dirichlet form in $\text{L}{}^2\text{(Ω; m)}$, where Ω is an open subset of $\text{R}$ⁿ, n ? 2, and m a Radon measure on Ω; for each integer k with 1 ? k < n, let $\text{S}$_k be a Dirichlet form on some k-dimensional submanifold $\text{Ω}{}_{\mathrm{k}}$ of Ω. The paper is devoted to the study of the closability of the forms E with domain $\text{C}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{(Ω)}$ and defined by: $\text{(?,g)=}$$\text{E}$$\text{(?, g)+}\text{∑}\text{i}\text{p}\text{=1}$$\text{E}$k_i where 1 ? k_p < ? < n, and where , g^k_i denote restrictions of ?, g in $\text{C}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{(Ω)}$ to . Conditions are given for E to be closable if, for each i = 1,…, p, one has k_i = n ? i. Other conditions are given for E to be nonclosable if, for some i, k_i < n ? i.