A Systematic Study of Structure and E−H Bond Activation Chemistry by Sterically Encumbered Germylene Complexes

A series of new germylene compounds has been synthesized offering systematic variation in the σ‐ and π‐capabilities of the α‐substituent and differing levels of reactivity towards E?H bond activation (E=H, B, C, N, Si, Ge). Chloride metathesis utilizing [(terphenyl)GeCl] proves to be an effective synthetic route to complexes of the type [(terphenyl)Ge(ER_n)] ( 1 – 6 : ER_n=NHDipp, CH(SiMe₃)₂, P(SiMe₃)₂, Si(SiMe₃)₃ or B(NDippCH)₂; terphenyl=C₆H₃Mes₂‐2,6=Ar^Mes or C₆H₃Dipp₂‐2,6=Ar^Dipp; Dipp=C₆H₃iPr₂‐2,6, Mes=C₆H₂Me₃‐2,4,6), while the related complex [{(Me₃Si)₂N}Ge{B(NDippCH)₂}] ( 8 ) can be accessed by an amide/boryl exchange route. Metrical parameters have been probed by X‐ray crystallography, and are consistent with widening angles at the metal centre as more bulky and/or more electropositive substituents are employed. Thus, the widest germylene units (θ>110°) are found to be associated with strongly σ‐donating boryl or silyl ancillary donors. HOMO–LUMO gaps for the new germylene complexes have been appraised by DFT calculations. The aryl(boryl)‐germylene system [Ar^MesGe{B(NDippCH)₂}] ( 6 ‐Mes), which features a wide C‐Ge‐B angle (110.4(1)°) and (albeit relatively weak) ancillary π‐acceptor capabilities, has the smallest HOMO–LUMO gap (119 kJ mol^?1). These features result in 6 ‐Mes being remarkably reactive, undergoing facile intramolecular C?H activation involving one of the mesityl ortho‐methyl groups. The related aryl(silyl)‐germylene system, [Ar^MesGe{Si(SiMe₃)₃}] ( 5 ‐Mes) has a marginally wider HOMO–LUMO gap (134 kJ mol^?1), rendering it less labile towards decomposition, yet reactive enough to oxidatively cleave H₂ and NH₃ to give the corresponding dihydride and (amido)hydride. Mixed aryl/alkyl, aryl/amido and aryl/phosphido complexes are unreactive, but amido/boryl complex 8 is competent for the activation of E?H bonds (E=H, B, Si) to give hydrido, boryl and silyl products. The results of these reactivity studies imply that the use of the very strongly σ‐donating boryl or silyl substituents is an effective strategy for rendering metallylene complexes competent for E?H bond activation.     

Investigation on ab initio calculations of the electron donor-acceptor complex H3N·SiH3Cl and the hypervalence of Si in it

The formation and the presence of hypervalent Si in the electron donor-acceptor complex H₃N·SiH₃Cl have been investigated by ab initio calculation. The results show that there is a 0.707eV decrease of energy when the complex H₃N·SiH₃Cl is formed from NH₃ and H₃SiCl, the interaction potential between the donor NH₃ and the acceptor H₃SiCl belongs to the Morse type, and the bond angle A(H-Si-Cl) versus bond length d(N-Si) presents a linear relation. The results also show that the interaction is mainly from giving the lone pair electrons in HOMO of NH₃ to LUMO of H₃SiCl, in which the 2p₂ of N and the 3d₀ of Si play important role. Bond N-Si is a weak n-σ* type dative one.     

Darstellung und Kristallstrukturen von Dipyridiniomethan-Monohalogenohydro-closo-Dodecaboraten(2−), [(C5H5N)2CH2][B12H11X]; X = Cl,Br, I

Preparation and Crystal Structures of Dipyridiniomethane Monohalogenohydro-closo-Dodecaborates(2?), [(C₅H₅N)₂CH₂][B₁₂H₁₁X]; X = Cl, Br, I [B₁₂H₁₂]^2? reacts with dihalogenomethanes CH₂X₂ in presence of trifluoro acetic acid, yielding the monohalogenododecaborates [B₁₂H₁₁X]^2? (X = Cl, Br, I), which are separated by ion exchange chromatography on diethylaminoethyl(DEAE) cellulose from the starting compound and higher halogenated products. The X-ray structure determinations of [(C₅H₅N)₂CH₂][B₁₂H₁₁Cl] · 2(CH₃)₂SO (orthorhombic, space group Pnma, a = 17.351(6), b = 16.034(5), c = 9.659(2) Å, Z = 4) and of the isotypic bromo and iodo compounds [(C₅H₅N)₂CH₂][B₁₂H₁₁X] (monoclinic, space group P2₁/n, Z = 4; for X = Br: a = 7.339(2), b = 15.275(3), c = 16.761(4) Å, β = 96.80(2)°; for X = I: a = 7.4436(8), b = 15.3510(8), c = 16.9213(16) Å, ß = 97.326(7)°) exhibit crystal lattices build up by columns of substituted boron clusters and angular dications [(C₅H₅N)₂CH₂]²⁺ orientated along the shortest axis which are assembled to alternating layers.     

Darstellung und Struktur der ersten gemischten Alkalimetallhydrogencarbonate NaA2[H(CO3)2] · 2H2O mit A = K,Rb

Preparation and Crystal Structure of the First Mixed Alkalimetal Hydrogencarbonates NaA₂[H(CO₃)₂] · 2H₂O with A = K, Rb The new hydrogencarbonates NaK₂[H(CO₃)₂] · 2H₂O (Pnma, a = 934.07(13) pm, b = 789.31(10) pm, c = 1142.1(5) pm, V_EZ = 842.0(4) · 10⁶ pm³, Z = 4, R1 (I ? 2σ(I)) = 0.023, wR2 = 0.066 for 989 reflections) and NaRb₂[H(CO₃)₂] · 2H₂O (Pnma, a = 948.24(11) pm, b = 811.37(9) pm, c = 1189.0(2) pm, V_EZ = 914.8(2) · 10⁶ pm³, Z = 4, R1 (I ≤ 2σ(I)) = 0.031, wR2 = 0.077 for 1063 reflections) were prepared from aqueous solutions. The crystal structures were determined. The isostructural compounds contain dimeric, non centrosymmetric [H(CO₃)₂]^3? anions. In NaK₂[H(CO₃)₂] · 2H₂O a short hydrogen bond (d(O … O) = 246.1(2) pm) with an asymmetric potential was detected. In NaRb₂[H(CO₃)₂] · 2H₂O a hydrogen bond with symmetric potential (d(O … O) = 247.8(5) pm) can be assumed. The IR-spectra of NaK₂[H(CO₃)₂] · 2H₂O and Na₃[H(CO₃)₂] · 2H₂O are compared.     

New insight into the substituent effects on the hydrolytic deamination of saturated and unsaturated cytosine

Ab initio calculations were carried out to understand the effect of electron donating groups (EDG) and electron withdrawing groups (EWG) at the C5 position of cytosine (Cyt) and saturated cytosine (H₂Cyt) of the deamination reaction. Geometries of the reactants, transition states, intermediates, and products were fully optimized at the B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) level in the gas phase as this level of theory has been found to agree very well with G3 theories. Activation energies, enthalpies, and Gibbs energies of activation along with the thermodynamic properties (ΔE, ΔH, and ΔG) of each reaction were calculated. A plot of the Gibbs energies of activation (ΔG^‡) for C5 substituted Cyt and H₂Cyt against the Hammett σ-constants reveal a good linear relationship. In general, both EDG and EWG substituents at the C5 position in Cyt results in higher ΔG^‡ and lower σ values compared to those of H₂Cyt deamination reactions. C5 alkyl substituents ( H,  CH₃,  CH₂CH₃,  CH₂CH₂CH₃) increase ΔG^‡ values for Cyt, while the same substituents decrease ΔG^‡ values for H₂Cyt which is likely due to steric effects. However, the Hammett σ-constants were found to decrease at the C5 position of cytosine (Cyt) and saturated cytosine (H2Cyt) on the deamination reaction. Both ΔG^‡ and σ values decrease for the substituents Cl and Br in the Cyt reaction, while ΔG^‡ values increase and σ decrease in the H₂Cyt reaction. This may be due to high polarizability of bromine which results in a greater stabilization of the transition state in the case of bromine compared to chlorine. Regardless of the substituent at C5, the positive charge on C4 is greater in the TS compared to the reactant complex for both the Cyt and H₂Cyt. Moreover, as the charges on C4 in the TS increase compared to reactant, ΔG^‡ also increase for the C5 alkyl substituents ( H,  CH₃,  CH₂CH₃,  CH₂CH₂CH₃) in Cyt, while ΔG^‡ decrease in H₂Cyt. In addition, analysis of the frontier MO energies for the transition state structures shows that there is a correlation between the energy of the HOMO–LUMO gap and activation energies.     

Optical properties of (Z)‐2‐(2‐phenylhydrazinylidene)acenaphthen‐1(2H)‐one: a potential electron donor in organic solar cells

Electron‐donating molecules play an important role in the development of organic solar cells. (Z )‐2‐(2‐Phenylhydrazinylidene)acenaphthen‐1(2H )‐one (PDAK), C₁₈H₁₂N₂O, was synthesized by a Schiff base reaction. The crystal structure shows that the molecules are planar and are linked together forming `face‐to‐face' assemblies held together by intermolecular C—H…O, π–π and C—H…π interactions. PDAK exhibits a broadband UV–Vis absorption (200–648 nm) and a low HOMO–LUMO energy gap (1.91 eV; HOMO is the highest occupied molecular orbital and LUMO is the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital), while fluorescence quenching experiments provide evidence for electron transfer from the excited state of PDAK to C₆₀. This suggests that the title molecule may be a suitable donor for use in organic solar cells.     

A Series of Isolable Silanoic Thio‐, Seleno‐, and Telluroesters (LSi(X)OR) with Donor‐Supported SiX Double Bonds (L=β‐Diketiminate; X=S,Se, Te)

The first silicon analogues of carbonic (carboxylic) esters, the silanoic thio‐, seleno‐, and tellurosilylesters 3 (Si?S), 4 (Si?Se), and 5 (Si?Te), were prepared and isolated in crystalline form in high yield. These thermally robust compounds are easily accessible by direct reaction of the stable siloxysilylene L(Si:)OSi(H)L′ 2 (L=HC(CMe)₂[N(aryl)₂], L′=CH[(C?CH₂)‐CMe][N(aryl)]₂; aryl=2,6‐iPr₂C₆H₃) with the respective elemental chalcogen. The novel compounds were fully characterized by methods including multinuclear NMR spectroscopy and single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis. Owing to intramolecular N→Si donor–acceptor support of the Si?X moieties (X=S, Se, Te), these compounds have a classical valence‐bond N⁺–Si–X^? resonance betaine structure. At the same time, they also display a relatively strong nonclassical Si?X π‐bonding interaction between the chalcogen lone‐pair electrons (n_π donor orbitals) and two antibonding Si? N orbitals (σ*_π acceptor orbitals mainly located at silicon), which was shown by IR and UV/Vis spectroscopy. Accordingly, the Si?X bonds in the chalcogenoesters are 7.4 ( 3 ), 6.7 ( 4 ), and 6.9 % ( 5 ) shorter than the corresponding Si? X single bonds and, thus, only a little longer than those in electronically less disturbed Si?X systems (“heavier” ketones).     

Is2Si(Li)?P(Li)SiR3 (Is = 2,4,6-iPr3C6H2): die ersten Lithiumsilanidyl-lithiumphosphanide und ihre Umwandlung in Disilaphosphirane und neuartige Mercuriophosphane

Is₂Si(Li)? P(Li)SiR₃ (Is = 2,4,6-ⁱPr₃C₆H₂): The First Lithiumsilanidyl-lithiumphosphanides and their Transformation into Disilaphosphiranes and Novel Mercuriophosphanes Upon addition of two mol equivalents lithium metal to the Si?P bond of the silylidenephosphanes (“phosphasilenes”) Is₂Si?P(SiⁱPr₃) and Is₂Si?P(SiPh₂Me) (Is = 2,4,6-ⁱPr₃C₆H₂) in tetrahydrofurane, the corresponding lithiumsilanidyl-lithiumsilylphosphanides are formed, which have been isolated as pale yellow solids; each Li center is solvated by two tetrahydrofurane molecules. The constitution of these compounds is established by multi nuclei NMR spectroscopy and derivatization reactions with water, deuteriumoxide, dichlorodimethylsilane, and tert-butylmercuriochloride, respectively. The reaction with dichlorodimethylsilane yields, via cyclocondensation reaction and elimination of lithiumchloride, the first disilaphosphacyclopropane derivatives, and the reaction with tert-butylmercuriochloride gives, under loss of the triorganosilyl group at phosphorus and via rearrangement processes, an unusual P, P-dimercuriosilylphosphane; the latter reacts with tert-butylmercuriochloride and mercuriodichloride in the molar ratio of 2 : 1 : 1 to give an molecular aggregate bearing a P₂Hg₆Cl₃ framework, which can be regared as an Lewis-acid base complex of a mercuriophosphane chelate ligand and mercuriodichloride.     

Die ersten Hydrogencarbonate mit einer trimeren [H2(CO3)3]4−-Baugruppe: Zur Darstellung und Kristallstruktur von Rb4H2(CO3)3 · H2O und K4H2(CO3)3 · 1,5 H2O

The First Hydrogencarbonates with a Trimeric [H₂(CO₃)₃]^4? Group: Preparation and Crystal Structure of Rb₄H₂(CO₃)₃ · H₂O and K₄H₂(CO₃)₃ · 1.5 H₂O Rb₄H₂(CO₃)₃ · H₂O and K₄H₂(CO₃)₃ · 1,5 H₂O were prepared by means of the reaction of (CH₃)₂CO₃ with RbOH resp. KOH in aqueous methanole. Trimer [H₂(CO₃)₃]^4?-anions were found in the crystal structure of Rb₄H₂(CO₃)₃ · H₂O (orthorhombic, Pnma (no. 62), a = 1 218.0(1) pm, b = 1 572.3(6) pm, c = 615.9(1) pm, V_EZ = 1 179.5(5) · 10⁶ pm³, Z = 4, R1(I ≥ 2σ(I)) = 0.027, wR2(I ≥ 2σ(I)) = 0.055). K₄H₂(CO₃)₃ · 1,5 H₂O crystallizes in an OD-structure. The determined superposition structure (orthorhombic, Pbam (no. 55), a = 1 161.8(1) pm, b = 597.0(1) pm, c = 383.85(3) pm, V_EZ = 266.3(1) · 10⁶ pm³, Z = 1, R1(I ≥ 2σ(I)) = 0.035, wR2(I ≥ 2σ(I)) = 0.074) can be derived from the structure of the rubidium compound. The thermal decomposition of the substances is discussed.     

Geminal interactions in ClZ(CH3)2X molecules (Z = C, Si, Ge) according to ab initio calculations

The structure and electronic parameters of ClZ(CH₃)₂X molecules (Z = C, Si, Ge, X = CH₃, OCH₃) were calculated by the RHF/6–31G(d) and RHF/6–311G(d,p) methods with full geometry optimization; calculations of ClZ(CH₃)₂OCH₃ molecules were also performed by the RHF/6–31G(d) method with partial geometry optimization. The ³⁵Cl NQR frequencies calculated from the populations of less diffuse 3p constituents of valence p orbitals of chlorine [RHF/6–31G(d)] were in agreement with the experimental values. The ³⁵Cl NQR frequencies for molecules with X = OCH₃ are lower than those for molecules with X = CH₃ (the Z atom being the same), due mainly to direct through-field polarization of the Z-Cl bond, induced by the effect of unshared electron pair of the oxygen atom in the trans position with respect to that bond. The difference in the ³⁵Cl NQR frequencies decreases in going from Z = C to Z = Si, Ge, in parallel with variation of the Z-Cl bond polarization as the size of Z increases.     

Darstellung und Kristallstrukturen von tBu‐substituierten Disiloxanen des Typus tBu2SiX‐O‐SiYtBu2 (X = Y = OH,Br; X = OH,Y = H) und den Addukten tBu3SiOH·(HO3SCF3)0.5·H2O und tBu3SiOLi·(LiO3SCF3)2·(H2O)2

Syntheses and Crystal Structures of tBu‐substituted Disiloxanes tBu₂SiX‐O‐SiYtBu₂ (X = Y = OH, Br; X = OH, Y = H) and of the Adducts tBu₃SiOH·(HO₃SCF₃)_0.5·H₂O and tBu₃SiOLi·(LiO₃SCF₃)₂·(H₂O)₂ The disiloxanes tBu₂SiX‐O‐SiYtBu₂ (X = Y = H, OH) are accessible from the reaction of CF₃SO₂Cl with tBu₂SiHOH or tBu₂Si(OH)₂. By this reaction the disiloxane tBu₂SiH‐O‐SiHtBu₂ is formed together with tBu₂SiH‐O‐SiOHtBu₂. The disiloxanes tBu₂SiX‐O‐SiYtBu₂ (X = Y = Cl, Br) can be synthesized almost quantitatively from tBu₂SiH‐O‐SiHtBu₂ with Cl₂ and Br₂ in CH₂Cl₂. The structures of the disiloxanes tBu₂SiX‐O‐SiYtBu₂ (X = H, Y = OH; X = Y = OH, Br) show almost linear Si‐O‐Si units with short Si‐O bonds. Single crystals of the adducts tBu₃SiOH·(HO₃SCF₃)_0.5·H₂O and tBu₃SiOLi·(LiO₃SCF₃)₂·(H₂O)₂ have been obtained from the reaction of tBu₃SiOH with CF₃SO₃H and of tBu₃SiO₃SCF₃ with LiOH. According to the result of the X‐ray structural analysis (hexagonal, P‐62c), tBu₃SiOLi · (LiO₃SCF₃)₂·(H₂O)₂ features the ion pair [(tBu₃SiOLi)₂(LiO₃SCF₃)₃(H₂O)₃Li]⁺ [CF₃SO₃]^?. The central framework of the cation forms a trigonal Li₆ prism.     

Die Kristallstrukturen von [Cu2Cl2(AA · H+)2](NO3)2 und [AA · H+]Pikr− (AA · H+ = Allylammonium; Pikr− = Pikrat)

The Crystal Structures of [Cu₂Cl₂(AA · H⁺)₂](NO₃)₂ and [AA · H⁺]Picr^? (AA · H⁺ = Allylammonium; Picr^? = Picrat) By an alternating current electro synthesis the crystal-line π-complex [Cu₂Cl₂(AA · H⁺)₂](NO₃)₂ has been obtained from CuCl₂ · 2H₂O, allylamine (AA), and HNO₃ in ethanolic solution. X-ray structure analysis revealed that the compound crystallized in the monoclinic system, space group P2₁/a, a = 7.229(3), b = 7.824(3), c = 26.098(6) Å, γ = 94.46(5)°, Z = 4, R = 0.025 for 2 023 reflections. The crystal structure is built up of Cu_nCl_n chains which are connected by π-bonding bidentate AA · H⁺ …? ON(O)O …? H⁺ · AA units. For comparision with the above complex the structure of [AA · H⁺]Picr^? (Picr^? = picrate anion) is also reported.     

Reaction Mechanism of the Symmetry‐Forbidden [2+2] Addition of Ethylene and Acetylene to Amido‐Substituted Digermynes and Distannynes Ph2NEENPh2, (E=Ge,Sn): A Theoretical Study

Quantum chemical calculations of reaction mechanisms for the formal [2+2] addition of ethylene and acetylene to the amido‐substituted digermyne and distannyne Ph₂N?EE?NPh₂ (E=Ge, Sn) have been carried out by using density functional theory at the BP86/def2‐TZVPP level. The nature and bonding situations were studied with the NBO method and with the charge and energy decomposition analysis EDA‐NOCV. The addition of ethylene to Ph₂N?EE?NPh₂ takes place through an initial [2+1] addition to one metal atom and consecutive rearrangement to four‐membered cyclic species, which feature a weak E?E bond. Rotation about the C?C bond with concomitant rupture of the E?E bond leads to the 1,2‐disubstituted ethanes, which have terminal E(NPh₂) groups. The overall reaction Ph₂N?EE?NPh₂+C₂H₄→(Ph₂N)E?C₂H₄?E(NPh₂) has very low activation barriers and is slightly exergonic for E=Ge but slightly endergonic for E=Sn. The analysis of the electronic structure shows that there is charge donation of nearly one electron to the ethylene moiety already in the first part of the reaction. The energy partitioning analysis suggests that the HOMO(Ph₂N?EE?NPh₂)→LUMO(C₂H₄) interaction has a similar strength as the HOMO(C₂H₄)→LUMO(Ph₂N?EE?NPh₂) interaction. The [2+2] addition of acetylene to Ph₂N?EE?NPh₂ also takes place through an initial [2+1] approach, which eventually leads to 1,2‐disubstituted olefins (Ph₂N)E?C₂H₂?E(NPh₂). The formation of the energetically lowest lying conformations of cis‐(Ph₂N)E?C₂H₂?E(NPh₂), which occurs with very low activation barriers, is clearly exergonic for the germanium and the tin compound. The trans‐coordinated isomers of (Ph₂N)E?C₂H₂?E(NPh₂) are slightly lower in energy than the cis form but they are separated by a substantial energy barrier for the rotation about the C?C bond. The energy decomposition analysis indicates that the initial reaction takes place under formation of electron‐sharing bonds between triplet fragments rather than HOMO–LUMO interactions.     

Interaction of aniline and benzidine with layered solids M n+(UO2XO4) n − ·z H2O[M = H3O+, Cu2+, VO2+, Fe2+; X = P,As]

The layered acid solids of formula H₃OUO₂XO₄· 3 H₂O (X = As, P) intercalate aniline and benzidine arylamines, by protonation of the guest molecules. The intercalates maintain the original laminar structure.The insertion of aniline and benzidinein the metal derivativesM(UO₂XO₄)₂·n H₂O (M = Cu, VO, Fe) requires rather drastic conditions. Near and medium infrared spectra of intercalates in which M = VO²⁺ and Cu²⁺, indicate that the polymerization and/or oxidation of sorbed amines occurs; however, the guest-host reactions for Fe²⁺-derivatives are of the acid-base type.     

Preparation and Crystal Structure Analyses of Compounds in the Systems HgO/MXO4/H2O (M = Co,Zn, Cd; X = S,Se)

During phase formation experiments under hydrothermal conditions (250 °C, 5d) in the systems HgO/MXO₄/H₂O (M = Co, Zn, Cd; X = S, Se), single crystals of the mercuric compounds (CdSO₄)₂(HgO)₂H₂O (I), (CdSeO₄)₂(HgO)₂H₂O (II), (CdSeO₄)Hg(OH)₂ (III), (CoSO₄)₂(HgO)₂H₂O (IV), (ZnSO₄)₂(HgO)₂H₂O (V), (ZnSeO₄)₂(HgO)₂H₂O (VI), and the mixed‐valent (ZnSe^IVO₃)(ZnSe^VIO₄)Hg^I₂(OH)₂ (VII) were obtained. The crystal structure determinations from X‐ray diffraction data revealed four unique structure types for these compounds. I and II crystallise isotypically in space group P2/n (a ≈ 7.85, b ≈ 6.28, c ≈ 10.5Å, β ≈ 102°), compound III crystallises in space group C2/m (a = 10.540(2), b = 9.0120(8), c = 6.1330(12)Å, β = 100.45(3)°), and the isotypic compounds IV, V and VI crystallise in space group Pbcm (a ≈ 6.15, b ≈ 11.3, c ≈ 13.1Å). Common with these three structure types are distorted octahedral [MO₆] and tetrahedral XO₄ building units which are organised in a layered assembly. Within the layers H bonding of OH groups or H₂O molecules of the [MO₆] octahedra leads to an additional stabilisation. Adjacent layers are separated by mercury atoms which are linearly bonded to two O atoms at short distances, forming either interconnecting [O‐Hg‐O] units which are part of [O‐Hg‐O]_∞ zig‐zag chains, or single [HO‐Hg‐OH] units (realised in compound III). VII is the only compound with mercury in oxidation state +1. It crystallises in space group C2/m (a = 17.342(3), b = 6.1939(10), c = 4.4713(8)Å, β = 90.154(3)°) and is made up of Hg₂²⁺ dumbbells, [ZnO₄(OH)₂] octahedra, and statistically distributed Se^VIO₄ and Se^IVO₃ groups as the main building units.     

Synthesis,Crystal Structure,and Magnetic Properties of {[Cu(phen)]2(C4H2O4)2} · 4.5H2O with C4H4O4 = Maleic Acid

Reaction of CuCl₂ · 2H₂O, phenanthroline, maleic acid and NaOH in CH₃OH/H₂O (1:1 v/v) at pH = 7.0 yielded blue {[Cu(phen)]₂(C₄H₂O₄)₂} · 4.5H₂O, which crystallizes in the monoclinic space group C2/c (no. 15) with cell dimensions: a = 18.127(2)Å, b = 12.482(2)Å, c = 14.602(2)Å, β = 103.43(1)°, U = 3213.5(8)ų, Z = 4. The crystal structure consists of the centrosymmetric dinuclear {[Cu(phen)]₂(C₄H₂O₄)₂} complex molecules and hydrogen bonded H₂O molecules. The Cu atoms are each square‐pyramidally coordinated by two N atoms of one phen ligand and three carboxyl O atoms of two maleato ligands with one carboxyl O atom at the apical position (d(Cu‐N) = 2.008, 2.012Å, equatorial d(Cu‐O) = 1.933, 1.969Å, axial d(Cu‐O) = 2.306Å). Two square‐pyramids are condensed via two apical carboxyl O atoms with a relatively larger Cu···Cu separation of 3.346(1)Å. The dinuclear complex molecules are assembled via the intermolecular π—π stacking interactions into 1D ribbons. Crossover of the resulting ribbons via interribbon π—π stacking interactions forms a 3D network with the tunnels occupied by H₂O molecules. The title complex behaves paramagnetically between 5—300 K, following the Curie‐Weiss law _χm(T—θ) = 0.435 cm³ · mol^—1 · K with θ = 1.59 K.     

Preparation and Crystal Structures of the Hydrous Mercury Tellurates,HgII(H4TeVIO6) and HgI2(H4TeVIO6)(H6TeVIO6)·2H2O

Single crystals of Hg^II(H₄Te^VIO₆) (colourless to light‐yellow, rectangular plates) and Hg^I₂(H₄Te^VIO₆)(H₆Te^VIO₆)·2H₂O (colourless, irregular) were grown from concentrated solutions of orthotelluric acid, H₆TeO₆, and respective solutions of Hg(NO₃)₂ and Hg₂(NO₃)₂. The crystal structures were solved and refined from single crystal diffractometer data sets (Hg^II(H₄Te^VIO₆): space group Pna2₁, Z = 4, a =10.5491(17), b = 6.0706(9), c = 8.0654(13)Å, 1430 structure factors, 87 parameters, R[F² > 2σ(F²)] = 0.0180; Hg^I₂(H₄Te^VIO₆)(H₆Te^VIO₆)·2H₂O: space group P1¯, Z = 1, a = 5.7522(6), b = 6.8941(10), c = 8.5785(10)Å, α = 90.394(8), β = 103.532(11), γ = 93.289(8)°, 2875 structure factors, 108 parameters, R[F² > 2σ(F²)] = 0.0184). The structure of Hg^II(H₄Te^VIO₆) is composed of ribbons parallel to the b axis which are built of [H₄TeO₆]^2— anions and Hg²⁺ cations held together by two short Hg—O bonds with a mean distance of 2.037Å. Interpolyhedral hydrogen bonding between neighbouring [H₄TeO₆]^2— groups, as well as longer Hg—O bonds between Hg atoms of one ribbon to O atoms of adjacent ribbons lead, to an additional stabilization of the framework structure. Hg^I₂(H₄Te^VIO₆)(H₆Te^VIO₆)·2H₂O is characterized by a distorted hexagonal array made up of [H₄TeO₆]^2— and [H₆TeO₆] octahedra which spread parallel to the bc plane. Interpolyhedral hydrogen bonding between both building units stabilizes this arrangement. Adjacent planes are stacked along the a axis and are connected by Hg₂²⁺ dumbbells (d(Hg—Hg) = 2.5043(4)Å) situated in‐between the planes. Additional stabilization of the three‐dimensional network is provided by extensive hydrogen bonding between interstitial water molecules and O and OH‐groups of the [H₄TeO₆]^2— and [H₆TeO₆] octahedra. Upon heating Hg^I₂(H₄Te^VIO₆)(H₆Te^VIO₆)·2H₂O decomposes into TeO₂ under formation of the intermediate phases Hg^II₃Te^VIO₆ and the mixed‐valent Hg^IITe^IV/VI₂O₆.     

A Hydrogen Adipato‐bridged Copper(II) Coordination Polymer: [Cu(bpy)(HL)]2L · 6H2O (bpy = 2, 2'‐Bipyridine,H2L = Adipic Acid)

Reaction of a fresh Cu(OH)_2x(CO₃)_1—x · yH₂O precipitate with adipic acid (H₂L) and 2, 2'—bipyridine (bpy) in ethanolic aqueous solution at room temperature afforded the hydrogen adipato bridged Cu^II coordination polymer [Cu(bpy)(HL)]₂L · 6H₂O consisting of double chains according to {[Cu(bpy)(HL)_2/2]₂L} and hydrogen bonded H₂O molecules. The chains result from [Cu(bpy)]²⁺ units bridged by bis—monodentate hydrogen adipato ligands and further crosslinked by bis—monodentate adipato ligands. Through the interchain π—π stacking interactions and interchain C(bpy)—H···O(adipato) hydrogen bonding interactions, the double chains are assembled into layers, between which the crystal H₂O molecules are located. The Cu atoms are square pyramidally coordinated by two N atoms of one bpy ligand and three O atoms of one adipato ligand and two hydrogen adipato ligands. The doubly bonded oxygen atom of the protonated carboxyl group occupies the apical position (Cu—N: 1.997, 2.005 Å; equatorial Cu—O: 1.925, 1.942 Å; apical Cu—O: 2.354 Å). Furthermore, the thermal behavior of the compound will be discussed. Crystal data: triclinic, P1¯ (no. 2), a = 9.618(1) Å, b = 9.933(1) Å, c = 12.782(2) Å, α = 70.88(1)°, β = 73.70(1)°, γ = 75.60(1)°, V = 1090.7(2) ų, Z = 1, R = 0.0453 and wR² = 0.1265 for 4643 observed reflections (F_o² > 2σ(F_o²)) out of 4985 unique reflections.     

Syntheses,Crystal Structures,and Thermal Behavior of Co(phen)(HL)2 and [Co2(phen)2(H2O)4L2]·H2O with H2L = Pimelic Acid

Two Co^II complexes, Co(phen)(HL)₂ ( 1 ) and [Co₂(phen)₂(H₂O)₄L₂]·H₂O ( 2 ) (H₂L = HOOC‐(CH₂)₅‐COOH), were synthesized and structurally characterized on the basis of single crystal X‐ray diffraction data. In complex 1 the Co atoms are tetrahedrally coordinated by two N atoms of one phen ligand and two O atoms of different hydrogenpimelato ligands. Through π—π stacking interactions between carboxyl group and phen ligand, the complex molecules are assembled into 1D columnar chains, which are connected by intermolecular hydrogen bonds. Complex 2 consists of the centrosymmetric dinuclear [Co₂(phen)₂(H₂O)₄L₂] molecules and hydrogen bonded H₂O molecules. The Co atoms are each octahedrally surrounded by two N atoms of one phen ligand and four O atoms from two bis‐monodentate pimelato ligands and two H₂O molecules at the trans positions. The results about thermal analyses, which were performed in flowing N₂ atmosphere, on both complexes were discussed. Crystal data: ( 1 ) C2/c (no. 15), a = 13.491(1)Å, b = 9.828(1)Å, c = 19.392(2)Å, β = 100.648(1)°, U = 2526.9(4)ų, Z = 4; ( 2 ) P1 (no. 2), a = 11.558(1)Å, b = 11.947(3)Å, c = 15.211(1)Å, α = 86.17(1)°, β = 75.55(1)°, γ = 69.95(1)°, U = 1910.3(3)ų, Z = 2.