Calculations of molecular properties in hybrid coupled-cluster and molecular mechanics approach

We report benchmark calculations obtained with our new coupled-cluster singles and doubles (CCSD) code for calculating the first- and second-order molecular properties. This code can be easily incorporated into combined [Valiev, M.; Kowalski, K. J. Chem. Phys. 2006, 125, 211101] classical molecular mechanics (MM) and ab initio coupled-cluster (CC) calculations using NWChem, enabling us to study molecular properties in a realistic environment. To test this methodology, we discuss the results of calculations of dipole moments and static polarizabilities for the Cl2O system in the CCl4 solution using the CCSD (CC with singles and doubles) linear response approach. We also discuss the application of the asymptotic extrapolation scheme (AES) [Kowalski, K.; Valiev, M. J. Phys. Chem. A 2006, 110, 13106] in reducing the numerical cost of CCSD calculations.     

卤素阴离子和取代苯间Anion-π作用强度的快速计算

A scheme that explicitly contains electrostatic, polarization, and dispersion interactions to rapidly simulate anion-π interactions is proposed and assessed by structural and energetic comparison with those produced via the complete basis set limit of the coupled-cluster singles and doubles plus perturbative triples [CCSD (T)/CBS] method for a set of X-…C₆H_6-nR_n complexes where X^-=F^-, Cl^-, Br^- and R=CN, F. We use the chemical bonds C≡N, C―F, and C―H of the substituted benzenes as bond dipoles. The electrostatic interactions are estimated by calculating the interactions between the charge of the anion and the bond dipole moments of the substituted benzene. The polarization interactions are described according to the variation of the magnitudes of the bond dipole moments with the local environment. The parameters needed are produced by fitting the high-quality CCSD (T)/CBS potential energy curves. Calculation results show that our scheme produces equilibrium intermolecular distances with a root-mean-square deviation of 0.004 nm and interaction energies with a root-mean-square deviation of 2.81 kJ·mol^-1 compared with the CCSD (T)/CBS results. The calculation results also show that our scheme reproduces the CCSD (T)/CBS potential energy curves well. These comparisons indicate the scheme proposed here is accurate and efficient, suggesting it may be a helpful tool to design and simulate relevant molecular materials.     

Extensive generalization of renormalized coupled-cluster methods

The recently developed completely renormalized (CR) coupled-cluster (CC) methods with singles, doubles, and noniterative triples or triples and quadruples [CR-CCSD(T) or CR-CCSD(TQ), respectively], which are based on the method of moments of CC equations (MMCC) [K. Kowalski and P. Piecuch, J. Chem. Phys. 113, 18 (2000)], eliminate the failures of the standard CCSD(T) and CCSD(TQ) methods at larger internuclear separations, but they are not rigorously size extensive. Although the departure from strict size extensivity of the CR-CCSD(T) and CR-CCSD(TQ) methods is small, it is important to examine the possibility of formulating the improved CR-CC methods, which are as effective in breaking chemical bonds as the existing CR-CCSD(T) and CR-CCSD(TQ) approaches, which are as easy to use as the CR-CCSD(T) and CR-CCSD(TQ) methods, and which can be made rigorously size extensive. This may be particularly useful for the applications of CR-CC methods and other MMCC approaches in calculations of potential energy surfaces of large many-electron systems and van der Waals molecules, where the additive separability of energies in the noninteracting limit is very important. In this paper, we propose different types of CR-CC approximations, termed the locally renormalized (LR) CCSD(T) and CCSD(TQ) methods, which become rigorously size extensive if the orbitals are localized on nointeracting fragments. The LR-CCSD(T) and LR-CCSD(TQ) methods rely on the form of the energy expression in terms of the generalized moments of CC equations, derived in this work, termed the numerator-denominator-connected MMCC expansion. The size extensivity and excellent performance of the LR-CCSD(T) and LR-CCSD(TQ) methods are illustrated numerically by showing the results for the dimers of stretched HF and LiH molecules and bond breaking in HF and H2O.     

Explicit correlation and basis set superposition error: the structure and energy of carbon dioxide dimer

We have investigated the slipped parallel and t-shaped structures of carbon dioxide dimer [(CO(2))(2)] using both conventional and explicitly correlated coupled cluster methods, inclusive and exclusive of counterpoise (CP) correction. We have determined the geometry of both structures with conventional coupled cluster singles doubles and perturbative triples theory [CCSD(T)] and explicitly correlated cluster singles doubles and perturbative triples theory [CCSD(T)-F12b] at the complete basis set (CBS) limits using custom optimization routines. Consistent with previous investigations, we find that the slipped parallel structure corresponds to the global minimum and is 1.09 kJ mol(-1) lower in energy. For a given cardinal number, the optimized geometries and interaction energies of (CO(2))(2) obtained with the explicitly correlated CCSD(T)-F12b method are closer to the CBS limit than the corresponding conventional CCSD(T) results. Furthermore, the magnitude of basis set superposition error (BSSE) in the CCSD(T)-F12b optimized geometries and interaction energies is appreciably smaller than the magnitude of BSSE in the conventional CCSD(T) results. We decompose the CCSD(T) and CCSD(T)-F12b interaction energies into the constituent HF or HF CABS, CCSD or CCSD-F12b, and (T) contributions. We find that the complementary auxiliary basis set (CABS) singles correction and the F12b approximation significantly reduce the magnitude of BSSE at the HF and CCSD levels of theory, respectively. For a given cardinal number, we find that non-CP corrected, unscaled triples CCSD(T)-F12b/VXZ-F12 interaction energies are in overall best agreement with the CBS limit.     

Renormalized coupled-cluster methods exploiting left eigenstates of the similarity-transformed Hamiltonian

Completely renormalized (CR) coupled-cluster (CC) approaches, such as CR-CCSD(T), in which one corrects the standard CC singles and doubles (CCSD) energy for the effects of triply (T) and other higher-than-doubly excited clusters [K. Kowalski and P. Piecuch, J. Chem. Phys. 113, 18 (2000)], are reformulated in terms of the left eigenstates Phimid R:L of the similarity-transformed Hamiltonian of CC theory. The resulting CR-CCSD(T)(L) or CR-CC(2,3) and other CR-CC(L) methods are derived from the new biorthogonal form of the method of moments of CC equations (MMCC) in which, in analogy to the original MMCC theory, one focuses on the noniterative corrections to standard CC energies that recover the exact, full configuration-interaction energies. One of the advantages of the biorthogonal MMCC theory, which will be further analyzed and extended to excited states in a separate paper, is a rigorous size extensivity of the basic ground-state CR-CC(L) approximations that result from it, which was slightly violated by the original CR-CCSD(T) and CR-CCSD(TQ) approaches. This includes the CR-CCSD(T)(L) or CR-CC(2,3) method discussed in this paper, in which one corrects the CCSD energy by the relatively inexpensive noniterative correction due to triples. Test calculations for bond breaking in HF, F(2), and H(2)O indicate that the noniterative CR-CCSD(T)(L) or CR-CC(2,3) approximation is very competitive with the standard CCSD(T) theory for nondegenerate closed-shell states, while being practically as accurate as the full CC approach with singles, doubles, and triples in the bond-breaking region. Calculations of the activation enthalpy for the thermal isomerizations of cyclopropane involving the trimethylene biradical as a transition state show that the noniterative CR-CCSD(T)(L) approximation is capable of providing activation enthalpies which perfectly agree with experiment.     

Partially linearized, fully size-extensive, and reduced multireference coupled-cluster methods. II. Applications and performance

The partially linearized (pl), fully size-extensive multireference (MR) coupled-cluster (CC) method, fully accounting for singles (S) and doubles (D) and approximately for a subset of primary higher than doubles, referred to as plMR CCSD, as well as its plMR CCSD(T) version corrected for secondary triples, as described in Part I of this paper [X. Li and J. Paldus, J. Chem. Phys. 128, 144118 (2008)], are applied to the problem of bond breaking in the HF, F2, H2O, and N2 molecules, as well as to the H4 model, using basis sets of a DZ or a cc-pVDZ quality that enable a comparison with the full configuration interaction (FCI) exact energies for a given ab initio model. A comparison of the performance of the plMR CCSD/CCSD(T) approaches with those of the reduced MR (RMR) CCSD/CCSD(T) methods, as well as with the standard single reference (SR) CCSD and CCSD(T) methods, is made in each case. For the H4 model and N2 we also compare our results with the completely renormalized (CR) CC(2,3) method [P. Piecuch and M. W?och, J. Chem. Phys. 123, 224105 (2005)]. An important role of a proper choice of the model space for the MR-type methods is also addressed. The advantages and shortcomings of all these methods are pointed out and discussed, as well as their size-extensivity characteristics, in which case we distinguish supersystems involving noninteracting SR and MR subsystems from those involving only MR-type subsystems. Although the plMR-type approaches render fully size-extensive results, while the RMR CCSD may slightly violate this property, the latter method yields invariably superior results to the plMR CCSD ones and is more easy to apply in highly demanding cases, such as the triple-bond breaking in the nitrogen molecule.     

Partially linearized, fully size-extensive, and reduced multireference coupled-cluster methods. I. Formalism and mutual relationship

We describe a fully size-extensive alternative of the reduced multireference (RMR) coupled-cluster (CC) method with singles (S) and doubles (D) that generates a subset of higher-than-pair cluster amplitudes, using linearized CC equations from the full CC chain, projected onto the corresponding higher-than-doubly excited configurations. This approach is referred to as partially linearized (pl) MR CCSD method and characterized by the acronym plMR CCSD. In contrast to a similar CCSDT-1 method [Y. S. Lee et al., J. Chem. Phys. 81, 5906 (1984)] this approach also considers higher than triples (currently up to hexuples), while focusing only on a small subset of such amplitudes, referred to as the primary ones. These amplitudes are selected using similar criteria as in RMR CCSD. An extension considering secondary triples via the standard (T)-type corrections, resulting in the plMR CCSD(T) method, is also considered. The relationship of RMR and plMR CCSD and CCSD(T) approaches is discussed, and their performance and characteristics are the subject of the subsequent Part II of this paper.     

The permanent dipole moment of gas-phase para-amino benzoic acid revisited

The permanent dipole moment of para-amino benzoic acid has been calculated at various theoretical levels, including Hartree-Fock, second-order M?ller-Plesset perturbation (MP2), coupled cluster singles and doubles (CCSD), and triples corrections CCSD(T), and hybrid density functional theory at B3LYP level. It is found that the B3LYP method fails to provide correct results for the geometry and the permanent dipole moment. These results are significantly improved by MP2 calculations. Our best estimated dipole moments obtained at CCSD and CCSD(T) levels are in good agreement with experiment.     

Hybrid coupled cluster methods: combining active space coupled cluster methods with coupled cluster singles, doubles, and perturbative triples

Based on the coupled-cluster singles, doubles, and a hybrid treatment of triples (CCSD(T)-h) method developed by us [J. Shen, E. Xu, Z. Kou, and S. Li, J. Chem. Phys. 132, 114115 (2010); and ibid. 133, 234106 (2010); and ibid. 134, 044134 (2011)], we developed and implemented a new hybrid coupled cluster (CC) method, named CCSD(T)q-h, by combining CC singles and doubles, and active triples and quadruples (CCSDtq) with CCSD(T) to deal with the electronic structures of molecules with significant multireference character. These two hybrid CC methods can be solved with non-canonical and canonical MOs. With canonical MOs, the CCSD(T)-like equations in these two methods can be solved directly without iteration so that the storage of all triple excitation amplitudes can be avoided. A practical procedure to divide canonical MOs into active and inactive subsets is proposed. Numerical calculations demonstrated that CCSD(T)-h with canonical MOs can well reproduce the corresponding results obtained with non-canonical MOs. For three atom exchange reactions, we found that CCSD(T)-h can offer a significant improvement over the popular CCSD(T) method in describing the reaction barriers. For the bond-breaking processes in F(2) and H(2)O, our calculations demonstrated that CCSD(T)q-h is a good approximation to CCSDTQ over the entire bond dissociation processes.     

The coupled cluster singles, doubles, and a hybrid treatment of connected triples based on the split virtual orbitals

We have proposed a simple strategy for splitting the virtual orbitals with a large basis set into two subgroups (active and inactive) by taking a smaller basis set as an auxiliary basis set. With the split virtual orbitals (SVOs), triple or higher excitations can be partitioned into active and inactive subgroups (according to the number of active virtual orbitals involved), which can be treated with different electron correlation methods. In this work, the coupled cluster (CC) singles, doubles, and a hybrid treatment of connected triples based on the SVO [denoted as SVO-CCSD(T)-h], has been implemented. The present approach has been applied to study the bond breaking potential energy surfaces in three molecules (HF, F(2), and N(2)), and the equilibrium properties in a number of open-shell diatomic molecules. For all systems under study, the SVO-CCSD(T)-h method based on the unrestricted Hartree-Fock (UHF) reference is an excellent approximation to the corresponding CCSDT (CC singles, doubles, and triples), and much better than the UHF-based CCSD(T) (CC singles, doubles, and perturbative triples). On the other hand, the SVO-CCSD(T)-h method based on the restricted HF (RHF) reference can also provide considerable improvement over the RHF-based CCSD(T).     

On the accuracy of computed excited-state dipole moments

The dipole moments of furan and pyrrole in many electronically excited singlet states have been determined using coupled cluster theory including large one-electron basis sets. The inclusion of connected triple excitations is shown to uniformly decrease the equation-of-motion coupled-cluster singles and doubles (EOM-CCSD) excitation energies by 0.04-0.24 eV, with an average reduction of 0.08 eV. Using a basis set larger than DZP (++)D (double-zeta plus polarization augmented with atom- and molecule-centered diffuse functions) uniformly increases the computed EOM-CCSD excitation energies by 0.03-0.29 eV, with an average increase of 0.20 eV. The corresponding shifts in excited-state dipole moments are more erratic. Including connected triple excitations changes the computed dipole moments by an rms amount of 0.17 au. More importantly, using a larger basis set shifts the dipole moments by an rms amount of 0.52 au, with an increase or a decrease being equally likely. The CC dipole moments are compared to those from time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT) computed by Burcl, Amos, and Handy [ Chem. Phys. Lett. 2002, 355, 8]. For 29 excited states of furan and pyrrole, the predicted TD-DFT dipole moments differ from the CC results by rms amounts of 1.6 au (HCTH functional) and 1.5 au (B97-1 functional). Including the asymptotic correction to TD-DFT developed by Tozer and Handy [ J. Chem. Phys. 1998, 109, 10180; J. Comput. Chem. 1999, 20, 106] reduces the rms differences for both functionals to 1.2 au. If those Rydberg excited states with very large polarizabilities are excluded, the rms differences from the CC results for the remaining 17 excited states become 1.31 au (HCTH) and 0.88 au (B97-1). For asymptotically corrected functionals and this subset of states, the rms differences from the CC results are only 0.54 au (HCTHc) and 0.34 au (B97-1c). Thus, the Tozer-Handy asymptotic correction for TD-DFT significantly improves the predictions of excited-state dipole moments. For excited states without very large polarizabilities, good agreement is achieved between excited-state dipole moments computed by coupled cluster theory and by the asymptotically corrected B97-1c density functional.     

Reduced multireference coupled cluster method with singles and doubles: Perturbative corrections for triples

The reduced multireference coupled-cluster method with singles and doubles (RMR CCSD) that employs multireference configuration interaction wave function as an external source for a small subset of approximate connected triples and quadruples, is perturbatively corrected for the remaining triples along the same lines as in the standard CCSD(T) method. The performance of the resulting RMR CCSD(T) method is tested on four molecular systems, namely, the HF and F(2) molecules, the NO radical, and the F(2) (+) cation, representing distinct types of molecular structure, using up to and including a cc-pVQZ basis set. The results are compared with those obtained with the standard CCSD(T), UCCSD(T), CCSD(2), and CR CCSD(T) methods, wherever applicable or available. An emphasis is made on the quality of the computed potentials in a broad range of internuclear separations and on the computed equilibrium spectroscopic properties, in particular, harmonic frequencies omega(e). It is shown that RMR CCSD(T) outperforms other triply corrected methods and is widely applicable.     

Critical comparison of various connected quadruple excitation approximations in the coupled-cluster treatment of bond breaking

To assess the limits of single-reference coupled-cluster (CC) methods for potential-energy surfaces, several methods have been considered for the inclusion of connected quadruple excitations. Most are based upon the factorized inclusion of the connected quadruple contribution (Qf) [J. Chem. Phys. 108, 9221 (1998)]. We compare the methods for the treatment of potential-energy curves for small molecules. These include CCSD(TQf), where the initial contributions of triple (T) and factorized quadruple excitations are added to coupled-cluster singles (S) and doubles (D), its generalization to CCSD(TQf), where instead of measuring their first contribution from orders in H, it is measured from orders in H=e(-(T1+T2))He(T1+T2); renormalized approximations of both, and CCSD2 defined in [J. Chem. Phys. 115, 2014 (2001)]. We also consider CCSDT, CCSDT(Qf), CCSDTQ, and CCSDTQP for comparison, where T, Q, and P indicate full triple, quadruple, and pentuple excitations, respectively. Illustrations for F2, the double bond breaking in water, and N2 are shown, including effects of quadruples on equilibrium geometries and vibrational frequencies. Despite the fact that no perturbative approximation, as opposed to an iterative approximation, should be able to separate a molecule correctly for a restricted-Hartree-Fock reference function, some of these higher-order approximations have a role to play in developing new, more robust procedures.     

SCF and localized orbitals in ethylene: MBPT/CC results and comparison with one-million configuration Cl

Many-body perturbation theory (MBPT) and coupled-cluster (CC) calculations are performed on the ethylene molecule employing canonical SCF and simple bond-orbital localized orbitals (LO). Full fourth-order MBPT [i.e. SDTQ MBPT(4)], CC doubles (CCD) and CC singles and doubles (CCSD) energies are compared with the over one-million configuration ‘bench-mark” Cl calculation of Saxe et al. Though the SCF and LO reference determinant energies differ by 0.29706 hartree, the CCSD energy difference is only 1.7 mhartrees (mh). Our most extensive SCF orbital calculation, CCSD plus fourth-order triples, is found to be lower in energy than the CI result by 5.3 mh.     

Symmetric and asymmetric triple excitation corrections for the orbital-optimized coupled-cluster doubles method: improving upon CCSD(T) and CCSD(T)(Λ): preliminary application

Symmetric and asymmetric triple excitation corrections for the orbital-optimized coupled-cluster doubles (OO-CCD or simply "OD" for short) method are investigated. The conventional symmetric and asymmetric perturbative triples corrections [(T) and (T)(Λ)] are implemented, the latter one for the first time. Additionally, two new triples corrections, denoted as OD(Λ) and OD(Λ)(T), are introduced. We applied the new methods to potential energy surfaces of the BH, HF, C(2), N(2), and CH(4) molecules, and compare the errors in total energies, with respect to full configuration interaction, with those from the standard coupled-cluster singles and doubles (CCSD), with perturbative triples [CCSD(T)], and asymmetric triples correction (CCSD(T)(Λ)) methods. The CCSD(T) method fails badly at stretched geometries, the corresponding nonparallelity error is 7-281 kcal mol(-1), although it gives reliable results near equilibrium geometries. The new symmetric triples correction, CCSD(Λ), noticeably improves upon CCSD(T) (by 4-14 kcal mol(-1)) for BH, HF, and CH(4); however, its performance is worse than CCSD(T) (by 1.6-4.2 kcal mol(-1)) for C(2) and N(2). The asymmetric triples corrections, CCSD(T)(Λ) and CCSD(Λ)(T), perform remarkably better than CCSD(T) (by 5-18 kcal mol(-1)) for the BH, HF, and CH(4) molecules, while for C(2) and N(2) their results are similar to those of CCSD(T). Although the performance of CCSD and OD is similar, the situation is significantly different in the case of triples corrections, especially at stretched geometries. The OD(T) method improves upon CCSD(T) by 1-279 kcal mol(-1). The new symmetric triples correction, OD(Λ), enhances the OD(T) results (by 0.01-2.0 kcal mol(-1)) for BH, HF, and CH(4); however, its performance is worse than OD(T) (by 1.9-2.3 kcal mol(-1)) for C(2) and N(2). The asymmetric triples corrections, OD(T)(Λ) and OD(Λ)(T), perform better than OD(T) (by 2.0-6.2 kcal mol(-1)). The latter method is slightly better for the BH, HF, and CH(4) molecules. However, for C(2) and N(2) the new results are similar to those of OD(T). For the BH, HF, and CH(4) molecules, OD(Λ)(T) provides the best potential energy curves among the considered methods, while for C(2) and N(2) the OD(T) method prevails. Hence, for single-bond breaking the OD(Λ)(T) method appears to be superior, whereas for multiple-bond breaking the OD(T) method is better.     

Small clusters of aluminum and tin: highly correlated calculations and validation of density functional procedures

We present results of molecular electronic structure treatments of multireference configuration interaction (MRCI) type for clusters Al(n) and Sn(n) in the range up to n = 4, and of coupled cluster singles and doubles with perturbative triples corrections (CCSD(T)) type in the range up to n = 10. Basis sets of quadruple zeta size are employed, computed energy differences, such as cohesive energies, E(coh), or dissociation energies for the removal of a single atom, D(e), differ from the complete basis set limit by only a few 0.01 eV. MRCI and CCSD(T) results are then compared to those obtained from density functional theory (DFT) treatments, which show that all computational procedures agree with the general features of D(e) and E(coh). The best agreement of DFT with CCSD(T) is found for the meta-GGA (generalized gradient approximation) TPSS (Tao, Perdew, Staroverov, Scuseria) for which D(e) differs from CCSD(T) by at most 0.15 eV for Al(n) and 0.21 eV for Sn(n). The GGA PBE (Perdew, Burke, Ernzerhof) is slightly poorer with maximum deviations of 0.23 and 0.24 eV, whereas hybrid functionals are not competitive with GGA and meta-GGA functionals. A general conclusion is that errors of D(e) and/or energy differences of isomers computed with DFT procedures may easily reach 0.2 eV and errors for cohesive energies E(coh) 0.1 eV.     

Communication: convergence of anharmonic infrared intensities of hydrogen fluoride in traditional and explicitly correlated coupled cluster calculations

It is shown that the convergence of anharmonic infrared spectral intensities with respect to the basis set size is much enhanced in explicitly correlated calculations as compared to traditional configuration interaction type wave function expansion. Explicitly correlated coupled cluster (CC) calculations using Slater-type geminal correlation factor (CC-F12) yield well-converged dipole derivatives and vibrational intensities for hydrogen fluoride with basis set involving f functions on the heavy atom. Combination of CC-F12 with singles, doubles, and non-iterative triples (CCSD(T)-F12) with small corrections due to quadruple excitations, core-electron correlation, and relativistic effects yields vibrational line positions, dipole moments, and transition dipole matrix elements in good agreement with the best experimental values.     

The coupled cluster approach with a hybrid treatment of connected triple excitations based on the restricted Hartree-Fock reference

A generalization of the coupled cluster (CC) singles, doubles, and a hybrid treatment of connected triples [denoted as CCSD(T)-h] [Shen et al., J. Chem. Phys. 132, 114115 (2010)] to the restricted Hartree-Fock (RHF) reference is presented. In this approach, active (or pseudoactive) RHF orbitals are constructed automatically by performing unitary transformations of canonical RHF orbitals so that they spatially mimic the natural orbitals of the unrestricted Hartree-Fock reference. The present RHF-based CCSD(T)-h approach has been applied to study the potential energy surfaces in several typical bond breaking processes and the singlet-triplet gaps in a diradical (HFH)(-1). For all systems under study, the overall performance of CCSD(T)-h is very close to that of the corresponding CCSD(T) (CC singles, doubles, and triples), and much better than that of CCSD(T) (CC singles, doubles, and perturbative triples).