Reaction of [CpRu(CH3CN)3]PF6 with bidentate ligands: structural characterization of [{CpRu(CH3CN)2}2(μ-η-dppe)](PF6)2 [dppe=1,2-bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane]

The reaction of [CpRu(CH₃CN)₃]PF₆ with the bidentate ligands L-L=1,2-bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane, dppe, and (1-diphenylarsino-2-diphenylphosphino)ethane, dpadppe, affords mononuclear or dinuclear complexes of formula [CpRu(η²-L-L)(CH₃CN)]PF₆, [{CpRu(CH₃CN)₂}₂(μ-η^1:1-L-L)](PF₆)₂ and [{CpRu(CH₃CN)}₂(μ-η^1:1-L-L)₂](PF₆)₂ (L-L=dppe, dpadppe). All of the compounds are characterized by microanalysis and NMR [¹H and ³¹P{¹H}] spectroscopy. The crystal structure of [{CpRu(CH₃CN)₂}₂(μ-η^1:1-dppe)](PF₆)₂ has been determined by X-ray diffraction analysis. The complex exhibits a dppe ligand bridging two CpRu(CH₃CN)₂ fragments.     

Ruthenium bidentate phosphine complexes for the coordination and catalytic dehydrogenation of amine- and phosphine-boranes

Addition of the amine–boranes H₃B ? NH₂tBu, H₃B ? NHMe₂ and H₃B ? NH₃ to the cationic ruthenium fragment [Ru(xantphos)(PPh₃)(OH₂)H][BAr^F₄] ( 2 ; xantphos=4,5‐bis(diphenylphosphino)‐9,9‐dimethylxanthene; BAr^F₄=[B{3,5‐(CF₃)₂C₆H₃}₄]^?) affords the η¹‐B? H bound amine–borane complexes [Ru(xantphos)(PPh₃)(H₃B ? NH₂tBu)H][BAr^F₄] ( 5 ), [Ru(xantphos)(PPh₃)(H₃B ? NHMe₂)H][BAr^F₄] ( 6 ) and [Ru(xantphos)(PPh₃)(H₃B ? NH₃)H][BAr^F₄] ( 7 ). The X‐ray crystal structures of 5 and 7 have been determined with [BAr^F₄] and [BPh₄] anions, respectively. Treatment of 2 with H₃B ? PHPh₂ resulted in quite different behaviour, with cleavage of the B? P interaction taking place to generate the structurally characterised bis‐secondary phosphine complex [Ru(xantphos)(PHPh₂)₂H][BPh₄] ( 9 ). The xantphos complexes 2 , 5 and 9 proved to be poor precursors for the catalytic dehydrogenation of H₃B ? NHMe₂. While the dppf species (dppf=1,1′‐bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene) [Ru(dppf)(PPh₃)HCl] ( 3 ) and [Ru(dppf)(η⁶‐C₆H₅PPh₂)H][BAr^F₄] ( 4 ) showed better, but still moderate activity, the agostic‐stabilised N‐heterocyclic carbene derivative [Ru(dppf)(ICy)HCl] ( 12 ; ICy=1,3‐dicyclohexylimidazol‐2‐ylidene) proved to be the most efficient catalyst with a turnover number of 76 h^?1 at room temperature.     

The Influence of N‐Heterocyclic Carbenes (NHC) on the Reactivity of [Ru(NHC)4H]+ With H2, N2, CO and O2

The five‐coordinate ruthenium N‐heterocyclic carbene (NHC) hydrido complexes [Ru(IiPr₂Me₂)₄H][BAr^F₄] ( 1 ; IiPr₂Me₂=1,3‐diisopropyl‐4,5‐dimethylimidazol‐2‐ylidene; Ar^F=3,5‐(CF₃)₂C₆H₃), [Ru(IEt₂Me₂)₄H][BAr^F₄] ( 2 ; IEt₂Me₂=1,3‐diethyl‐4,5‐dimethylimidazol‐2‐ylidene) and [Ru(IMe₄)₄H][BAr^F₄] ( 3 ; IMe₄=1,3,4,5‐tetramethylimidazol‐2‐ylidene) have been synthesised following reaction of [Ru(PPh₃)₃HCl] with 4–8 equivalents of the free carbenes at ambient temperature. Complexes 1 – 3 have been structurally characterised and show square pyramidal geometries with apical hydride ligands. In both dichloromethane or pyridine solution, 1 and 2 display very low frequency hydride signals at about δ ?41. The tetramethyl carbene complex 3 exhibits a similar chemical shift in toluene, but shows a higher frequency signal in acetonitrile arising from the solvent adduct [Ru(IMe₄)₄(MeCN)H][BAr^F₄], 4 . The reactivity of 1 – 3 towards H₂ and N₂ depends on the size of the N‐substituent of the NHC ligand. Thus, 1 is unreactive towards both gases, 2 reacts with both H₂ and N₂ only at low temperature and incompletely, while 3 affords [Ru(IMe₄)₄(η²‐H₂)H][BAr^F₄] ( 7 ) and [Ru(IMe₄)₄(N₂)H][BAr^F₄] ( 8 ) in quantitative yield at room temperature. CO shows no selectivity, reacting with 1 – 3 to give [Ru(NHC)₄(CO)H][BAr^F₄] ( 9 – 11 ). Addition of O₂ to solutions of 2 and 3 leads to rapid oxidation, from which the Ru^III species [Ru(NHC)₄(OH)₂][BAr^F₄] and the Ru^IV oxo chlorido complex [Ru(IEt₂Me₂)₄(O)Cl][BAr^F₄] were isolated. DFT calculations reproduce the greater ability of 3 to bind small molecules and show relative binding strengths that follow the trend CO ? O₂ > N₂ > H₂.     

N-Heterocyclic Carbene Analogues of Nucleophilic Phosphinidene Transition Metal Complexes

Chloride abstraction from the complexes [(η⁶-p-cymene){(IDipp)P}MCl] ( 2 a , M=Ru; 2 b , M=Os) and [(η⁵-C₅Me₅){(IDipp)P}IrCl] ( 3 b , IDipp=1,3-bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)imidazolin-2-ylidene) with sodium tetrakis[3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]borate (NaBAr^F) in the presence of trimethylphosphine (PMe₃), 1,3,4,5-tetramethylimidazolin-2-ylidene (^MeIMe) or carbon monoxide (CO) afforded the complexes [(η⁶-p-cymene){(IDipp)P}M(PMe₃)]BAr^F] ( 4 a , M=Ru; 4 b , M=Os), [(η⁶-p-cymene){(IDipp)P}Os(^MeIMe)]BAr^F] ( 5 ) and [(η⁵-C₅Me₅){(IDipp)P}IrL][BAr^F] ( 6 , L=PMe₃; 7 , L=^MeIMe; 8 , L=CO). These cationic N-heterocyclic carbene-phosphinidene complexes feature very similar structural and spectroscopic properties as prototypic nucleophilic arylphosphinidene complexes such as low-field ³¹P NMR resonances and short metal-phosphorus double bonds. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations reveal that the metal-phosphorus bond can be described in terms of an interaction between a triplet [(IDipp)P]⁺ cation and a triplet metal complex fragment ligand with highly covalent σ- and π-contributions. Crystals of the C−H activated complex 9 were isolated from solutions containing the PMe₃ complex, and its formation can be rationalized by PMe₃ dissociation and formation of a putative 16-electron intermediate [(η⁵-C₅Me₅)Ir{P(IDipp)}I][BAr^F], which undergoes C−H activation at one of the Dipp isopropyl groups and addition along the iridium-phosphorus bond to afford an unusual η³-benzyl coordination mode.     

(1,3-Diformylindenyl)cyclopentadienyl ruthenium derivatives

The reaction of [CpRu(CH₃CN)₃][PF₆], [Cp*RuCl] _n , and [Cp^FRuCl]n with 1,3-diformylindene results in the predominant formation of zwitter-ionic arene-cyclopentadienyl complexes {η⁶-1,3-(CHO)₂C₉H₅}RuCp (Cp = C₅H₅), {η⁶-1,3-(CHO)₂C₉H₅}RuCp* (Cp* = C₅Me₅), and {η⁶-1,3-(CHO)₂C₉H₅}RuCp^F (Cp^F = C₅Me₄CF₃), respectively. The ruthenocenes {η⁵-1,3-(CHO)₂C₉H₅}RuCp, {η⁵-1,3-(CHO)₂C₉H₅}RuCp*, and {η⁵-1,3-(CHO)₂C₉H₅}RuCpF were synthesized by the reaction of 1,3-diformylindenyl potassium with [CpRu(CH₃CN)₃][PF₆], [Cp*RuCl] _n , and [Cp^FRuCl] _n .     

Syntheses and Structures of Ruthenium Complexes Containing a Ru‐H‐Tl Three‐Center–Two‐Electron Bond

Treatment of CpRuH(PP) (PP=dppm, dppe) with TlPF₆ produced [CpRu(H)(Tl)(PP)]PF₆. X‐ray diffraction and computational studies suggest that the complexes contain a Ru?H?Tl 3c–2e bond and can be viewed as the first σ‐complexes of period 6 main‐group hydrides [CpRu{η²‐(H?Tl)}(PP)]PF₆ or [Tl{η²‐H?RuCp(PP)}]PF₆. The complexes can be stored as a solid at room temperature for days without appreciable decomposition, but are unstable in solution and evolved to the trimetallic complexes [{CpRu(PP)}₂(μ‐Tl)]PF₆.     

Microwave‐Assisted Synthesis and Transformations of Cationic CpRu(II)(naphthalene) and CpRu(II)(naphthoquinone) Complexes

Details of the direct synthesis of cationic Ru(II)(η⁵‐Cp)(η⁶‐arene) complexes from ruthenocene using microwave heating are reported. Developed for the important catalyst precursor [Ru(II)(η⁵‐Cp)(η⁶‐1‐4,4a,8a‐naphthalene)][PF₆] reaction time could be shortened from three days to 15 min. The method was extended to [Ru(II)(η⁶‐benzene)(η⁵‐Cp)][PF₆], [Ru(II)(η⁵‐Cp)(η⁶‐toluene)][PF₆], [Ru(II)(η⁵‐Cp)(η⁶‐mesitylene)][PF₆], [Ru(II)(η⁵‐Cp)(η⁶‐hexamethylbenzene)][PF₆], [Ru(II)(η⁵Cp)(η⁶‐indane)][PF₆], [Ru(II)(η⁵‐Cp)(η⁶‐2,6‐dimethylnaphthalene)][PF₆], and [Ru(II)(η⁵‐Cp)(η⁶‐pyrene)][PF₆]. 1‐methylnaphthalene and 2,3‐dimethylnaphthalene afforded mixtures of regioisomeric complexes. [Ru(Cp)(CH₃CN)₃][PF₆], derived from the naphthalene precursor provided access to the cationic RuCp complexes of naphthoquinone, tetralindione, 1,4‐dihydroxynaphthalene, and 1,4‐dimethoxynaphthalene. Reduction of the tetralindione complex afforded selectively the endo,endo diol derivative. X‐Ray structures of five complexes are reported.     

Comparative reactivity studies of dppf-containing CpRu and (C6Me6)Ru complexes towards different donor ligands (dppf=1,1-bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene)

[CpRu(dppf)Cl] (Cp=η⁵-C₅H₅) (1) and [(HMB)Ru(dppf)Cl]PF₆ ((HMB)=η⁶-C₆Me₆) (3) react with different donor ligands to give rise to N-, P- and S-bonded complexes. The stoichiometric reactions of 1 and 3 with NaNCS give the mononuclear complexes [CpRu(dppf)(NCS)] (2) and [(HMB)Ru(dppf)(NCS)]PF₆ (4), respectively, in yields above 80%, while 3 also gives a dppf-bridged diruthenium complex [(HMB)Ru(NCS)₂]₂(μ-dppf) (5) in 67% yield from reaction with four molar equivalents of NaNCS. Compound 5 is also obtained in 70% yield from the reaction of 4 with excess NaNCS. With CH₃CN in the presence of salts, both 1 and 3 give their analogous solvento derivatives [CpRu(dppf)(CH₃CN)]BPh₄ (6) and [(HMB)Ru(dppf)(CH₃CN)] (PF₆)₂ (7). With phosphines, the reaction of 1 gives chloro-displaced complexes [(CpRu(dppf)L]PF₆ (L =PMe₃ (8), PMe₂Ph(9)), whereas the reaction of 3 with PMe₂Ph leads to substitution of dppf, giving [(HMB)Ru(PMe₂Ph)₂Cl] PF₆ (10). The reaction of 1 with NaS₂CNEt₂ gives a dinuclear dppf-bridged complex [{CpRu(S₂CNEt₂)}₂(μ-dppf)] (11), whereas that of 3 results in loss of the HMB ligand giving a mononuclear complex [Ru(dppf)(S₂CNEt₂)₂] (12). With elemental sulfur S₈, 1 is oxidized to give a dinuclear CpRu^III dppf-chelated complex [{CpRu(dppf)}₂(μ-S₂)](BPh₄)Cl (13), whereas 3 undergoes oxidation at the ligand, giving a dppf-displaced complex [(HMB)Ru(CH₃CN)₂Cl]PF₆ (14) and free dppfS₂. The structures of 1, 2, 5-9, 11, 13 and 14 were established by X-ray single crystal diffraction analyses. Of these, 5 and 11 both contain a dppf-bridge between Ru^II centers, while 13 is a dinuclear CpRu^III disulfide-bridged complex; all the others are mononuclear. All complexes obtained were also spectroscopically characterized.     

Synthesis and structures of metallocene complexes of iron(II) and ruthenium(II) derived from 9,9′-spirobifluorene

Reaction between 9,9′-spirobifluorene and [CpM]⁺ (where M = Fe and Ru) equivalents gives the complexes [CpRu(η⁶-SBF)][PF₆] (1), [(CpRu)₂(η⁶,η⁶-SBF)][PF₆]₂ (2) and [(CpFe)₂(η⁶,η⁶-SBF)][PF₆]₂ (3), respectively. Single crystal X-ray structures of 1 and 3 show that the metal atoms exhibit distorted η⁶-coordination to SBF phenyl moieties primarily as a consequence of steric interactions between Cp and SBF. The structure of 3 contains each of the possible C₂ enantiomers whereas NMR spectroscopy shows signals consistent with a 1:1 mixture of C₂ and C₁ stereoisomers for both 2 and 3. In conjunction with electrochemical data the observations are consistent with SBF acting as a molecule containing two independent biphenyl moieties.     

Isolation and Structure of Germylene‐Germyliumylidenes Stabilized by N‐Heterocyclic Imines

The ditopic germanium complex FGe(NIPr)₂Ge[BF₄] ( 3 [BF₄]; IPr=1,3‐bis(2,6‐diisopropylphenyl)imidazolin‐2‐ylidene) is prepared by the reaction of the amino(imino)germylene (Me₃Si)₂NGeNIPr ( 1 ) with BF₃?OEt₂. This monocation is converted into the germylene‐germyliumylidene 3 [BAr^F₄] [Ar^F=3,5‐(CF₃)₂‐C₆H₃] by treatment with Na[BAr^F₄]. The tetrafluoroborate salt 3 [BF₄] reacts with 2 equivalents of Me₃SiOTf to give the novel complex (OTf)(GeNIPr)₂[OTf] ( 4 [OTf]), which affords 4 [BAr^F₄] and 4 [Al(OR^F)₄] [R^F=C(CF₃)₃] after anion exchange with Na[BAr^F₄] or Ag[Al(OR^F)₄], respectively. The computational, as well as crystallographic study, reveals that 4 ⁺ has significant bis(germyliumylidene) dication character.     

Positional and compositional disorder in a ruthenium(II) piano‐stool complex

In (η⁶‐p‐cymene)(difluorophosphinato‐κO){2‐[(1H‐pyrazol‐1‐yl)methyl‐κN²]pyridine‐κN}ruthenium(II) 0.85‐hexafluorophosphate 0.15‐tetrafluoroborate, [Ru(PO₂F₂)(C₁₀H₁₄)(C₉H₉N₃)](PF₆)_0.85(BF₄)_0.15, (I), the [PO₂F₂]⁻ ligand exhibits positional disorder due to one F atom and one O atom sharing the same two positions related by a mirror reflection across the O—P—F plane. The correct composition of this coordinated anion was successfully determined to be [PO₂F₂]⁻ by refining the complex with various tetrahedral anions in which terminal atoms have similar atomic form factors. The noncoordinated counter‐ion is compositionally disordered between [PF₆]⁻ and [BF₄]⁻. The difficulty in determining the correct composition of this anion illustrates the importance of a crystallographer remaining impartial and open to encountering unexpected moieties in the process of elucidating a structure.     

Synthesis and Systematic Structural Analysis of Cationic Half-Sandwich Ruthenium Chalcogenocarbonyl Complexes

Although the chemistry of transition-metal complexes with carbonyl (CO) and thiocarbonyl (CS) ligands has been well developed, their heavier analogues, namely selenocarbonyl (CSe) and tellurocarbonyl (CTe) complexes remain scarce. The limited availability of such CSe and CTe complexes has so far hampered our understanding of the differences between such chalcogenocarbonyl (CE: E=O, S, Se, Te) ligands. Herein, we report the synthesis and properties of a series of cationic half-sandwich ruthenium CE complexes of the type [CpRu(CE)(H₂IMes)(CNCH₂Ts)][BAr^F₄] (Cp=η⁵-C₅H₅⁻; H₂IMes=1,3-dimesitylimidazolin-2-ylidene; Ar^F=3,5-(CF₃)₂C₆H₃). A combination of X-ray diffraction analyses, NMR spectroscopic analyses, and DFT calculations revealed an increasing π-accepting ability of the CE ligands in the order O<S<Se<Te. A variable-temperature NMR analysis of the thus obtained chiral-at-metal CE complexes indicated high stereochemical stability.     

Pseudohalogen Chemistry in Ionic Liquids with Non-innocent Cations and Anions

Within the second funding period of the SPP 1708 “Material Synthesis near Room Temperature”,which started in 2017, we were able to synthesize novel anionic species utilizing Ionic Liquids (ILs) both, as reaction media and reactant. ILs, bearing the decomposable and non-innocent methyl carbonate anion [CO₃Me]⁻, served as starting material and enabled facile access to pseudohalide salts by reaction with Me₃Si−X (X=CN, N₃, OCN, SCN). Starting with the synthesized Room temperature Ionic Liquid (RT-IL) [nBu₃MeN][B(OMe)₃(CN)], we were able to crystallize the double salt [nBu₃MeN]₂[B(OMe)₃(CN)](CN). Furthermore, we studied the reaction of [WCC]SCN and [WCC]CN (WCC=weakly coordinating cation) with their corresponding protic acids HX (X=SCN, CN), which resulted in formation of [H(NCS)₂]⁻ and the temperature labile solvate anions [CN(HCN)_n]⁻ (n=2, 3). In addition, the highly labile anionic HCN solvates were obtained from [PPN]X ([PPN]=μ-nitridobis(triphenylphosphonium), X=N₃, OCN, SCN and OCP) and HCN. Crystals of [PPN][X(HCN)₃] (X=N₃, OCN) and [PPN][SCN(HCN)₂] were obtained when the crystallization was carried out at low temperatures. Interestingly, reaction of [PPN]OCP with HCN was noticed, which led to the formation of [P(CN)₂]⁻, crystallizing as HCN disolvate [PPN][P(CN⋅HCN)₂]. Furthermore, we were able to isolate the novel cyanido(halido) silicate dianions of the type [SiCl_0.78(CN)_5.22]²⁻ and [SiF(CN)₅]²⁻ and the hexa-substituted [Si(CN)₆]²⁻ by temperature controlled halide/cyanide exchange reactions. By facile neutralization reactions with the non-innocent cation of [Et₃HN]₂[Si(CN)₆] with MOH (M=Li, K), Li₂[Si(CN)₆] ⋅ 2 H₂O and K₂[Si(CN)₆] were obtained, which form three dimensional coordination polymers. From salt metathesis processes of M₂[Si(CN)₆] with different imidazolium bromides, we were able to isolate new imidazolium salts and the ionic liquid [BMIm]₂[Si(CN)₆]. When reacting [Mes(nBu)Im]₂[Si(CN)₆] with an excess of the strong Lewis acid B(C₆F₅)₃, the voluminous adduct anion {Si[CN⋅B(C₆F₅)₃]₆}²⁻ was obtained.     

[(η-C6H6)Ru(L)(Cl/N3/CN/CH3CN)] complexes of non-planar pyrazolylmethylpyridine ligands: Formation of helices due to C-H?X (X = Cl, N) interaction

Structural analysis of a previously reported half-sandwich complex having three-legged “piano-stool” geometry [(η⁶-C₆H₆)Ru^II(L¹)Cl][PF₆] (1) (L¹ = 2-(pyrazol-1-ylmethyl)pyridine) is described. Treatment of 1 with (i) Ag(CF₃SO₃) in CH₃CN and (ii) NaN₃ in CH₃OH, and (iii) the reaction between [(η⁶-C₆H₆)Ru(L²)Cl]-[PF₆] (2) (previously reported) and NaCN in C₂H₅OH led to the isolation of [(η⁶-C₆H₆)Ru(L¹)(CH₃CN)][PF₆]₂ (3), [(η⁶-C₆H₆)Ru(L¹)(N₃)][PF₆] (4), and [(η⁶-C₆H₆)Ru(L²)(CN)][PF₆] (5), respectively (L² = 2-(3,5-dimethyl-pyrazol-1-ylmethyl)pyridine). The complex [(η⁶-C₆H₆)Ru(L⁴)Cl][PF₆] (6) with a new ligand (L⁴ = 2-[3-(4-fluorophenyl)pyrazol-1-ylmethyl]pyridine) has also been synthesized. The structures of 3-6 have been elucidated (¹H NMR spectra; CD₃CN). The molecular structures of 1, 4, and 6·C₆H₅CH₃ have been determined. Notably, the crystal-packing in these structures is governed by C-H?X (X = Cl, N) interactions, generating helical architectures.     

On-Surface Metathesis of an Ionic Liquid on Ag(111)

We investigated the adsorption, surface enrichment, ion exchange, and on-surface metathesis of ultrathin mixed IL films on Ag(111). We stepwise deposited 0.5 ML of the protic IL diethylmethylammonium trifluoromethanesulfonate ([dema][TfO]) and 1.0 ML of the aprotic IL 1-methyl-3-octylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate ([C₈C₁Im][PF₆]) at around 90 K. Thereafter, the resulting layered frozen film was heated to 550 K, and the thermally induced phenomena were monitored in situ by angle-resolved X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Between 135 and 200 K, [TfO]⁻ anions at the Ag(111) surface are exchanged by [PF₆]⁻ anions and enriched together with [C₈C₁Im]⁺ cations at the IL/vacuum interface. Upon further heating, [dema][PF₆] and [OMIm][PF₆] desorb selectively at ∼235 and ∼380 K, respectively. Hereby, a wetting layer of pure [C₈C₁Im][TfO] is formed by on-surface metathesis at the IL/metal interface, which completely desorbs at ∼480 K. For comparison, ion enrichment at the vacuum/IL interface was also studied in macroscopic IL mixtures, where no influence of the solid support is expected.     

Dithiocarbamate complexes of cyclopentadienylcobalt(III), [Co(η-C5H5)(L)(S2CNR2)] (L = ligand)

The reactions of [Co(η-C₅H₅)(L)I₂] with Na[S₂CNR₂] (R = alkyl or phenyl) give [Co(η-C₅H₅)(I)(S₂CNR₂)] (I) when L = CO and [Co(η-C₅H₅)(L)(S₂CNR₂)]I (II) when L is a tertiary phosphine, phosphite or stibine, or organo-isocyanide ligand. In similar reactions [Co(η-C₅H₅)(CO)(C₃F₇)I] gives [Co(η-C₅H₅)(C₃F₇)(S₂CNMe₂)] and [Mn(η-MeC₅H₄)(CO)₂(NO)]PF₆ forms [Mn(η-MeC₅H₄)(NO)(S₂CNR₂)]. The iodide ligands in I may be displaced by L, to give II, or by other ligands such as [CN]^?, [NCS]^?, H₂O or pyridine whilst SnCl₂ converts it to SnCl₂I. The iodide counter-anion in II may be replaced by others to give [BPh₄]^?, [Co(CO)₄]^? or [NO₃]^? salts. However [CN]^? acts differently and displaces (PhO)₃P from [Co(η-C₅H₅){P(OPh)₃}(S₂CNMe)]I to give [Co(η-C₅H₅)(CN)(S₂CNMe₂)] which may be alkylated reversibly by MeI and irreversibly by MeSO₃F to [Co(η-C₅H₅)(CNMe)(S₂CNMe₂)]⁺ salts. Conductivity measurements suggest that solutions of I in donor solvents are partially ionized with the formation of [Co(η-C₅H₅)(solvent)(S₂CNR₂)]⁺ I^? species. The IR and ¹H NMR spectra of the various complexes are reported. They are consistent with pseudo-octahedral “pianostool” molecular structures in which the bidentate dithiocarbamate ligands are coordinated to the metal atoms through both sulphur atoms.     

Cationic Functionalisation by Phosphenium Ion Insertion

The reaction of [Cp′′′Ni(η³-P₃)] ( 1 ) with in situ generated phosphenium ions [RR′P]⁺ yields the unprecedented polyphosphorus cations of the type [Cp′′′Ni(η³-P₄R₂)][X] (R=Ph ( 2 a ), Mes ( 2 b ), Cy ( 2 c ), 2,2′-biphen ( 2 d ), Me ( 2 e ); [X]⁻=[OTf]⁻, [SbF₆]⁻, [GaCl₄]⁻, [BAr^F]⁻, [TEF]⁻) and [Cp′′′Ni(η³-P₄RCl)][TEF] (R=Ph ( 2 f ), tBu ( 2 g )). In the reaction of 1 with [Br₂P]⁺, an analogous compound is observed only as an intermediate and the final product is an unexpected dinuclear complex [{Cp′′′Ni}₂(μ,η³:η¹:η¹-P₄Br₃)][TEF] ( 3 a ). A similar product [{Cp′′′Ni}₂(μ,η³:η¹:η¹-P₄(2,2′-biphen)Cl)][GaCl₄] ( 3 b ) is obtained, when 2 d [GaCl₄] is kept in solution for prolonged times. Although the central structural motif of 2 a – g consists of a “butterfly-like” folded P₄ ring attached to a {Cp′′′Ni} fragment, the structures of 3 a and 3 b exhibit a unique asymmetrically substituted and distorted P₄ chain stabilised by two {Cp′′′Ni} fragments. Additional DFT calculations shed light on the reaction pathway for the formation of 2 a – 2 g and the bonding situation in 3 a .     

Field desorption mass spectra of [M(CO)3(η-arene)]X (MMn,Re; XBF4, PF6) salts

Field desorption mass spectra are reported for a range of [M(CO)₃(η-arene)]X (MMn or Re, XBF₄ or PF₆) salts. In most cases the spectra are simple, being dominated by molecular, [M]^+·, [M + 1]⁺, and [MCO]⁺ ions for the cationic part of their structure. However, with the π-chloroarene complexes [Mn(CO)₃(η-ClC₆H₅)]PF₆ and [Mn(CO)₃(η-1-Cl, 4-MeC₆H₄)]PF₆, facile loss of the chloro substituent and further fragmentation leads to unusually complex spectra, which include strong peaks arising from recombination of fragment species. Cluster ions are also noted in several cases, allowing identification of the anion.     

Half-sandwich ruthenium(II)-arene complexes: synthesis,spectroscopic studies,biological properties,and molecular modeling

In search for antitumor metal-based drugs that would mitigate the severe side-effects of cisplatin, Ru(II) complexes are gaining increasing recent interest. In this work, we report on the synthesis, characterization (¹H- and ¹³C-NMR, FT-IR), and cytotoxicity studies of two new half-sandwich organometallic Ru(II) complexes of the general formula [Ru(η⁶-arene)(XY)Cl](PF₆) where arene?=?benzene or toluene and XY?=?bidentates: dipyrido[3,2-a:2′,3′-c]phenazine (dppz) or 2-(9-anthryl)-1H-imidazo[4,5-f][1,10]phenanthroline (aip), which are bound to Ru(II) via two phenanthroline-N atoms in a characteristic “piano-stool” configuration of Ru(II)-arene complexes—as confirmed by vibrational and NMR spectra. In addition, cytotoxic studies were performed for similar half-sandwich organometallic [Ru(η⁶-p-cymene)(Me₂dppz)Cl]PF₆ complex (Me₂dppz = 11,12-dimethyl-dipyrido[3,2-a:2′,3′-c]phenazine). This study is complemented with elaborate modeling with density functional theory (DFT) calculations, which provided insight into reactive sites of Ru(II) structures, further detailed by molecular docking on the B-DNA dodecamer, which identified binding sites and affinities: most pronounced for the [Ru(η⁶-benzene)(aip)Cl](PF₆) in both A-T and G-C regions of the DNA minor groove. Cytotoxic activity was probed versus tumor cell lines B16, C6, and U251 (B16 mouse melanoma, C6 rat glioma, U251 human glioblastoma) and non-tumor cell line HACAT (HACAT normal human keratinocytes).     

Dicopper complexes catalyzed coupling/cyclization of 2‐bromobenzoic acids with amidines leading to quinazolinones

Dicopper(I) complexes {Cu₂(bpnp)(CH₃CN)₄}(PF₆)₂] ( 2 ), [{Cu₂(bpnp)(CH₃CN)₄}(BAr₄^F)₂] ( 3 ) and [Cu₂(bpnp)Cl₂] ( 4 ) were prepared from the complexation of [Cu(CH₃CN)₄](PF₆) with 2,7‐bis(2‐pyridyl)‐1,8‐naphthyridine (bpnp) followed by anion metathesis and treatment of chloride sequentially. The X‐ray structural analysis of 4 indicates the molecule to have a twofold axis passing through the Cu₂Cl₂ core, which has the shape of a butterfly, and that the Cu atom is tetrahedrally coordinated with in a Cl₂N₂ donor set. In preliminary experiments 2 was found to be an effective catalyst in the coupling/cyclization of 2‐bromobenzoic acids with amidines, providing the corresponding quinazolinones in good yields. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.