Disrupting within-channel cues to comodulation masking release

Comodulation masking release (CMR), assessed using a flanking-band (FB) paradigm, may reflect the contribution of both across- and within-channel cues when FBs are proximal to the signal frequency. This study examined the effect of disrupting within-channel cues based upon envelope beats at the output of an auditory filter centered at the signal frequency, using a method described by Richards [(1988) Hear. Res. 35, 47-58], here called "on-frequency band (OFB) reversal." This removed regular beats for a pair of proximal FBs centered symmetrically about the OFB on a linear frequency scale (but not for a single FB that had the same center frequency as either of the constituent FBs in a pair) while maintaining the comodulation of individual noise bands that provides the basis for across-channel processes. OFB reversal consistently reduced CMR for proximal FB pairs--but not for a single FB or distal FB pair or when the FBs were presented in the opposite ear to the signal plus OFB--across a range of signal frequencies and for continuous and gated noise presentation. Simulations indicated that OFB reversal reduces the availability of within-channel cues based upon temporal fine structure and changes in envelope statistics.     

Within-channel cues in comodulation masking release (CMR): experiments and model predictions using a modulation-filterbank model

Experiments and model calculations were performed to study the influence of within-channel cues versus across-channel cues in comodulation masking release (CMR). A class of CMR experiments is considered that are characterized by a single (unmodulated or modulated) bandpass noise masker with variable bandwidth centered at the signal frequency. A modulation-filterbank model suggested by Dau et al. [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102, 2892-2905 (1997)] was employed to quantitatively predict the experimental data. Effects of varying masker bandwidth, center frequency, modulator bandwidth, modulator type, and signal duration on CMR were examined. In addition, the effect of band limiting the noise before or after modulation was shown to influence the CMR in the same way as a systematic variation of the modulation depth. It is demonstrated that a single-channel analysis, which analyzes only the information from one peripheral channel, quantitatively accounts for the CMR in most cases, indicating that an across-channel process is generally not necessary for simulating results from this class of CMR experiments. True across-channel processes may be found in another class of CMR experiments.     

Across-channel masking and comodulation masking release

These experiments on across-channel masking (ACM) and comodulation masking release (CMR) were designed to extend the work of Grose and Hall [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 85, 1276-1284 (1989)] on CMR. They investigated the effect of the temporal position of a brief 700-Hz signal relative to the modulation cycle of a 700-Hz masker 100% sinusoidally amplitude modulated (SAM) at a 10-Hz rate, which was either presented alone (reference masker) or formed part of a masker consisting of the 3rd to 11th harmonics of a 100-Hz fundamental. In the harmonic maskers, each harmonic was either SAM with the same 10-Hz modulator phase (comodulated masker) or with a shift in modulator phase of 90 degrees for each successive harmonic (phase-incoherent masker). When the signal was presented at the dips of the envelope of the 700-Hz component, the comodulated masker gave lower thresholds than the reference masker, while the phase-incoherent masker gave higher thresholds, i.e., a CMR was observed. No CMR was found when the signal was presented at the peaks of the envelope. In experiment 1, we replicated the experiment of Grose and Hall, but with an additional condition in which the 600- and 800-Hz components were removed from the masker, in order to investigate the role of within-channel masking effects. The results were similar to those of Grose and Hall. In experiment 2, the signal was added at the peaks of the envelope of the 700-Hz component, but in antiphase to the carrier of that component and at a level chosen to transform the peaks into dips. No CMR was found. Rather, performance was worse for both the comodulated and phase-incoherent maskers than for the reference masker. This was true even when the flanking components in the maskers were all remote in frequency from 700 Hz. In experiment 3, the masker components were all 50% SAM and the signal was added in antiphase at a dip of the envelope of the 700-Hz component, thus making the dip deeper. Performance was worse for the phase-incoherent than for the reference masker and was worse still for the comodulated masker. The results of all three experiments indicate strong ACM effects. CMR was found only when the signal was placed in the dips of the masker envelope and when it produced an increase in level relative to that in adjacent bands.     

Effects of the selective disruption of within- and across-channel cues to comodulation masking release

In many experiments on comodulation masking release (CMR), both across- and within-channel cues may be available. This makes it difficult to determine the mechanisms underlying CMR. The present study compared CMR in a flanking-band (FB) paradigm for a situation in which only across-channel cues were likely to be available [FBs placed distally from the on-frequency band (OFB)] and a situation where both across- and within-channel cues might have been available (proximally spaced FBs, for which larger CMRs have previously been observed). The use of across-channel cues was selectively disrupted using a manipulation of auditory grouping factors, following Dau et al. [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 125, 2182-2188(2009)] and the use of within-channel cues was selectively disrupted using a manipulation called "OFB reversal," following Goldman et al. [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 129, 3181-3193 (2011)]. The auditory grouping manipulation eliminated CMR for the distal-FB configuration and reduced CMR for the proximal-FB configuration. This may indicate that across-channel cues are available for proximal FB placement. CMR for the proximal-FB configuration persisted when both manipulations were used together, which suggests that OFB reversal does not entirely eliminate within-channel cues.     

Temporal decline of masking and comodulation masking release.

Masking sounds can be continuously present, gated simultaneously with the signal, or gated somewhat prior to the signal. This continuum of relative onset times was explored using waveforms of the sort commonly employed in studies of comodulation masking release (CMR). There was a 50-Hz masker band centered on the 1250-Hz tonal signal, and four 50-Hz flanker bands centered at 850, 1050, 1450, and 1650 Hz. In some conditions, all four flanker bands had the same temporal envelope, and the masker band either had that same envelope (correlated presentations) or a different envelope (uncorrelated presentations). In other conditions, all five bands had different temporal envelopes (all-uncorrelated presentations). The masker band and/or the four flanker bands were either gated nearly simultaneously with the signal (burst conditions) or were gated prior to the signal by a duration that was systematically varied (fringed conditions). The eight listeners could be partitioned into three groups on the basis of their response to these fringing manipulations. Two listeners (the large fringers) showed a gradual improvement in detectability with increasing fringe duration (called a temporal decline of masking), while three others (the small fringers) showed little improvement in detectability. For the remaining three subjects, there was evidence of a "learning" effect that changed them from large fringers to small fringers over a 10-week period of listening. When present, the temporal decline of masking was greater for the correlated than for the uncorrelated comodulation condition; as a consequence, the difference in detectability between them (the comodulation masking release or CMR) increased with fringe duration. By fringing the masker and flanker bands separately and in combination, it was revealed that the temporal declines of masking were primarily attributable to the fringing of the flanker bands. In contrast, large CMRs required long fringes on both the masker and flanker bands. The above results were obtained with 50-ms signals, but generally similar data were obtained with a signal duration of 240 ms. The difficulties raised for experimentalists and theorists by such long-term practice effects are discussed.     

Effects of flanking band proximity, number, and modulation pattern on comodulation masking release

Comodulation masking release for a 700-Hz pure-tone signal was investigated as a function of the number and spectral positions of 20-Hz-wide comodulated flanking bands. In the first experiment, all stimuli were presented diotically. CMR was examined as a function of the number of flanking bands present, in conditions where the bands were arranged symmetrically around the signal frequency, were below the signal frequency, or were above the signal frequency. The number of flanking bands ranged from one to eight, and the magnitude of the diotic CMR ranged from approximately 5-16 dB. The results indicated: (1) bands closer to the signal resulted in larger masking release, and (2) more bands gave rise to larger CMR (but with diminishing returns above two flanking bands). Two additional sets of diotic conditions were examined and compared to the condition where all eight comodulated flanking bands were present: In one set of conditions, two of the eight flanking bands were removed; in the other set of conditions, two of the eight flanking bands were replaced with bands (termed "deviant" bands) that were not comodulated with respect to the other bands. There was very little effect of reducing eight bands to six, even when the removed bands were relatively near the signal frequency; however, CMR was substantially reduced when deviant bands were introduced, particularly when the deviant bands were placed relatively near the signal frequency. These reductions in CMR were slightly greater when each of the deviant bands had a unique modulation pattern (bideviant bands) than when the two deviant bands themselves shared the same modulation pattern (codeviant bands). In the second experiment, dichotic conditions were examined where the number and spectral positions of the flanking bands in the nonsignal ear were varied (the signal ear received only a 20-Hz-wide noise band centered on the signal frequency). The magnitude of the dichotic CMR ranged from approximately 2-10 dB, depending on condition. Effects of proximity and the number of flanking bands were similar to the effects obtained in diotic conditions. For both the diotic and the dichotic data, the effects of proximity were more consistent with an interpretation based upon across-channel processing than upon a within-channel interaction. The results obtained using deviant bands indicate that it is difficult for the auditory system to disregard the modulation pattern of flanking bands that differ from the modulation pattern of the on-signal band, particularly if such bands are proximal to the signal frequency.     

Failure to obtain comodulation masking release with frequency-modulated maskers

These experiments were intended to determine whether comodulation masking release (CMR) occurs for maskers that are modulated in frequency rather than in amplitude. In experiment I, thresholds for a sinusoidal signal were measured in the presence of two continuous sinusoidal maskers: one was centered at the signal frequency (1.0 kHz), and the other was positioned at flanking frequencies ranging from 0.5 to 2.0 kHz. The two maskers were frequency modulated (FM) by the same low-pass-noise modulator (correlated condition) or by independent noise modulators (uncorrelated condition). Thresholds were the same for the correlated and uncorrelated maskers, i.e., no CMR occurred. This was also true when the flanking band was presented in the ear opposite to that containing the signal and the on-frequency masking band. In experiment II, 25-Hz-wide noise maskers were used. The on-frequency band was sinusoidally frequency modulated, while the off-frequency band either had the same FM or no FM. Thresholds were similar for the two conditions, again indicating that no CMR occurred. The results suggest that, unlike amplitude modulation, correlated FM of the masker in different frequency bands does not give rise to a release from masking.     

The effect of signal-frequency uncertainty on comodulation masking release

The aim of this study was to examine whether the scheme of across-frequency comparison underlying comodulation masking release (CMR) is sensitive to the placement of the signal in the array of comodulating bands. This was addressed using the paradigm of signal-frequency uncertainty. In the first experiment, maskers were constructed of linearly spaced sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones, and the signal was a pure tone presented at one of five frequencies. A small uncertainty effect was observed for the noncomodulated masker, but no significant effect was observed for the comodulated masker. In the second experiment, the maskers were constructed of logarithmically spaced noise bands, and the signal was a pure tone presented at one of seven frequencies. In these conditions, an uncertainty effect was observed in both noncomodulated and comodulated maskers, which was larger than that observed in experiment 1. The results were interpreted as indicating that the mechanism of across-frequency comparison underlying CMR is sensitive to signal location.     

Some factors affecting the magnitude of comodulation masking release

This paper examines some of the factors that can affect the magnitude of comodulation masking release (CMR). In experiment I, psychometric functions were measured for the detection of a 1-kHz sinusoidal signal in a "multiplied" narrow-band noise centered at 1 kHz (reference condition) and the same noise with two comodulated flanking bands added. The functions were slightly steeper for the comodulated than for the reference masker. Thus CMRs measured at a high percent correct point were slightly (0.4 dB) larger than CMRs measured at a low percent correct point. Large individual differences were found for the reference masker but not for the comodulated masker. Experiment II compared CMRs obtained with narrow-band Gaussian noise and multiplied noise, using a single flanking band. For a flanking band remote from the signal frequency, the CMRs were smaller and more variable for the multiplied noise than for the Gaussian noise. This variability arose mainly from individual differences in the reference condition. Experiment III compared growth-of-masking functions for a signal centered in Gaussian noise and multiplied noise. Thresholds were lower for the multiplied than for the Gaussian noise, and the differences were greatest at high noise levels. The results are consistent with the idea that, for multiplied noise, some subjects can detect a change in the distribution of the envelope of the stimulus, when the signal is added to the masker. Such subjects have low thresholds in the reference condition, and give small CMRs. Other subjects are relatively insensitive to this cue. They have higher thresholds in the reference condition, and give larger CMRs. For Gaussian noise, thresholds for the reference condition are relatively stable across subjects and CMRs tend to be substantial, even for flanking-band frequencies remote from the signal frequency.     

Role of suppression and retro-cochlear processes in comodulation masking release

Recent physiological studies suggest that comodulation masking release (CMR) could be a consequence of wideband inhibition at the level of the cochlear nucleus. The present study investigates whether the existence region of psychophysical CMR is comparable to the inhibitory areas of units showing a physiological correlate of CMR. Since the inhibitory areas are similar to suppressive regions at the level of the basilar membrane, the amount of CMR that can be accounted for by suppression was determined by predicting the data with a model incorporating a peripheral nonlinearity. A CMR of up to 6 dB could still be experimentally observed for a flanking band (FB) four octaves below the on-frequency masker (OFM). For FB frequencies below the OFM, the suggested model predicts CMR equal to the measured CMR for high levels of the FB. The model underestimates the magnitude of CMR for midlevels of the FB, indicating that suppression alone cannot account for CMR. The data are consistent with the hypothesis that wideband inhibition plays a role in CMR.     

Comodulation masking release for various monaural and binaural combinations of the signal, on-frequency, and flanking bands

The threshold for a signal masked by a narrow band of noise centered at the signal frequency (the on-frequency band) may be reduced by adding to the masker a second band of noise (the flanking band) whose envelope is correlated with that of the first band. This effect is called comodulation masking release (CMR). These experiments examine two questions. (1) How does the CMR vary with the number and ear of presentation of the flanking band(s)? (2) Is it possible to obtain a CMR when a binaural masking level difference (BMLD) is already present, and vice versa? Thresholds were measured for a 400-ms signal in a continuous 25-Hz-wide noise centered at signal frequencies (fs) of 250, 1000, and 4000 Hz. This masker was presented either alone or with one or more continuous flanking bands whose envelopes were either correlated or uncorrelated with that of the on-frequency band; their frequencies ranged from 0.5fs to 1.5fs. CMRs were measured for six conditions in which the signal, the on-frequency band, and the flanking band(s) were presented in various monaural and binaural combinations. When a single flanking band was used, the CMR was typically around 2-3 dB. The CMR increased to 5-6 dB if an additional flanking band was added. The effect of the additional band was similar whether it was in the same ear as the original band or in the opposite ear. At the lowest signal frequency, a large CMR was observed in addition to a BMLD and vice versa. At the highest signal frequency, the extra release from masking was small. The results are interpreted in terms of the cues producing the CMR and the BMLD.     

Binaural comodulation masking release: effects of masker interaural correlation

Binaural detection was examined for a signal presented in a narrow band of noise centered on the on-signal masking band (OSB) or in the presence of flanking noise bands that were random or comodulated with respect to the OSB. The noise had an interaural correlation of 1.0 (No), 0.99 or 0.95. In No noise, random flanking bands worsened Spi detection and comodulated bands improved Spi detection for some listeners but had no effect for other listeners. For the 0.99 or 0.95 interaural correlation conditions, random flanking bands were less detrimental to Spi detection and comodulated flanking bands improved Spi detection for all listeners. Analyses based on signal detection theory indicated that the improvement in Spi thresholds obtained with comodulated bands was not compatible with an optimal combination of monaural and binaural cues or to across-frequency analyses of dynamic interaural phase differences. Two accounts consistent with the improvement in Spi thresholds in comodulated noise were (1) envelope information carried by the flanking bands improves the weighting of binaural cues associated with the signal; (2) the auditory system is sensitive to across-frequency differences in ongoing interaural correlation.     

Frequency discrimination under conditions of comodulation masking release (L)

Masked detection thresholds can often be improved by introducing coherent masker amplitude modulation across frequency, a phenomenon referred to as comodulation masking release (CMR). While CMR can be large for detection, it is smaller for supra-threshold tasks, such as intensity discrimination. In this experiment, frequency discrimination for a 1000-Hz tone near threshold was found to be poorer in an amplitude-modulated than a steady bandpass noise. These results parallel previous findings for intensity discrimination. Although this study examined the relatively simple task of frequency discrimination, the results may have implications for more complex tasks, such as speech recognition in fluctuating noise.     

Comodulation masking release: evidence for multiple cues

Signal detection was determined in conditions where the masker was a 10-Hz-wide noise band centered on the signal, and in conditions where either a comodulated or noncomodulated noise band (centered at 0.8 times the signal frequency) was also present. Signal frequencies of 500 or 2000 Hz were investigated. In one condition of the first experiment, the signal was exactly the same 10-Hz-wide noise band as the masker, added to the masker in phase. This condition was designed to limit the availability of cues based upon dip listening, suppression, beating, or across-frequency differences in noise envelope correlation, but to afford a cue based upon across-frequency envelope amplitude difference. The narrow-band noise signal resulted in approximately the same magnitude of comodulated masking release (CMR) as was found for a pure-tone signal. This result suggested that one important cue for CMR is an across-frequency difference in envelope amplitude. Stimulus conditions in the second experiment were intended to disrupt cues of across-frequency envelope amplitude difference, but to afford cues based upon across-frequency differences in noise envelope correlation. In this experiment, cues based upon envelope amplitude were impoverished by randomly varying the level of the flanking band from interval to interval, and by adjusting the level in the on-signal band to be the same in the nonsignal intervals as the level of noise plus signal in the signal interval. Again, substantial CMRs occurred, suggesting that another cue for CMR may be envelope pattern or correlation. The results of these experiments indicated that CMR is probably based upon more than one stimulus variable.     

Temporal decline of masking and comodulation detection differences

Comodulation detection differences (CDDs) were studied using flanking bands that were either gated simultaneously with the signal band (burst) or gated at varying times prior to signal onset (fringed). Used for these experiments were a signal band centered at 1250 Hz and four flanking bands centered at 450, 850, 1650, and 2050 Hz; all bands were 100 Hz wide. In different conditions, the temporal envelope of the signal band was either the same as (correlated), or different from (uncorrelated), the common envelope of the four flanking bands, or the temporal envelopes of all of the bands were different (all-uncorrelated). For 8 of the 13 listeners, signal detectability improved by as much as 25 dB as the temporal fringe of the flanking bands was increased from 5 to about 700 ms. This temporal decline of masking was similar, but not identical, for the correlated, uncorrelated, and all-uncorrelated conditions. Results of this sort are reminiscent of several related findings that have been attributed to auditory adaptation or enhancement, or to a temporally developing critical-band filter. The other 5 of the 13 listeners were generally more sensitive than the majority, and they showed little or no improvement in detectability as fringe duration was varied. Large individual differences of this sort are not uncommon in the adaptation and comodulation literatures. As signal duration was changed from 50 to 240 ms, temporal integration was less in the correlated condition than in the uncorrelated condition, thereby producing a larger CDD with the longer signal. When the fringe followed the observation interval instead of preceding it, the results were equivocal because detectability improved for the majority of subjects and worsened for the minority. In follow-up experiments, different subsets of these four flanking bands were used. When temporal gaps of varying duration were inserted into the flanking band(s) immediately prior to the observation intervals, it was found that a temporal gap as long as 355 ms was not sufficient to reset the mechanisms underlying the temporal decline of masking.     

Comparison of level discrimination, increment detection, and comodulation masking release in the audio- and envelope-frequency domains

In general, the temporal structure of stimuli must be considered to account for certain observations made in detection and masking experiments in the audio-frequency domain. Two such phenomena are (1) a heightened sensitivity to amplitude increments with a temporal fringe compared to gated level discrimination performance and (2) lower tone-in-noise detection thresholds using a modulated masker compared to those using an unmodulated masker. In the current study, translations of these two experiments were carried out to test the hypothesis that analogous cues might be used in the envelope-frequency domain. Pure-tone carrier amplitude-modulation (AM) depth-discrimination thresholds were found to be similar using both traditional gated stimuli and using a temporally modulated fringe for a fixed standard depth (ms = 0.25) and a range of AM frequencies (4-64 Hz). In a second experiment, masked sinusoidal AM detection thresholds were compared in conditions with and without slow and regular fluctuations imposed on the instantaneous masker AM depth. Release from masking was obtained only for very slow masker fluctuations (less than 2 Hz). A physiologically motivated model that effectively acts as a first-order envelope change detector accounted for several, but not all, of the key aspects of the data.     

Rhythmic masking release: contribution of cues for perceptual organization to the cross-spectral fusion of concurrent narrow-band noises

The contribution of temporal asynchrony, spatial separation, and frequency separation to the cross-spectral fusion of temporally contiguous brief narrow-band noise bursts was studied using the Rhythmic Masking Release paradigm (RMR). RMR involves the discrimination of one of two possible rhythms, despite perceptual masking of the rhythm by an irregular sequence of sounds identical to the rhythmic bursts, interleaved among them. The release of the rhythm from masking can be induced by causing the fusion of the irregular interfering sounds with concurrent "flanking" sounds situated in different frequency regions. The accuracy and the rated clarity of the identified rhythm in a 2-AFC procedure were employed to estimate the degree of fusion of the interferring sounds with flanking sounds. The results suggest that while synchrony fully fuses short-duration noise bursts across frequency and across space (i.e., across ears and loudspeakers), an asynchrony of 20-40 ms produces no fusion. Intermediate asynchronies of 10-20 ms produce partial fusion, where the presence of other cues is critical for unambiguous grouping. Though frequency and spatial separation reduced fusion, neither of these manipulations was sufficient to abolish it. For the parameters varied in this study, stimulus onset asynchrony was the dominant cue determining fusion, but there were additive effects of the other cues. Temporal synchrony appears to be critical in determining whether brief sounds with abrupt onsets and offsets are heard as one event or more than one.     

Comodulation masking release: effects of training and experimental design on use of within- and across-channel cues

The effects of training and experimental design on comodulation masking release (CMR) were assessed. The study of Dau et al. [(2009), J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 125, 2182-2188], which used auditory-grouping manipulations to distinguish the use of within- and across-channel cues to CMR, was replicated in Experiment One but using naive subjects and an experimental design that minimized familiarization with the cues. Subjects made effective use of within- but not across-channel cues. Experiment Two examined training effects over more testing sessions, across four experimental designs (to minimize or maximize repeated exposure to the cues) and using an auditory grouping manipulation ("postcursors") to distinguish the use of within- and across-channel cues. Naive subjects were tested with either two or four flanking bands (FBs), to determine if training effects varied with the amount of FB information. Within-channel cues could be used from the outset, but effective use of across-channel cues required training when they were less salient. Increased repeated exposure enhanced the effects of training. Experiment Three tested naive subjects using two FBs, but with noise presented continuously and a different auditory grouping manipulation, after Grose et al. [(2009), J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 125, 282-293]. CMR was large from the outset.     

Detection cues in forward masking and their relationship to off-frequency listening

Conventional and restricted-listening psychophysical tuning curve paradigms were used to evaluate the masking ability of forward maskers of different envelope characteristics, and the relationship between off-frequency listening effects and the envelope characteristics of both the variable masker and stationary masker used to restrict listening to a narrow region surrounding the probe. Maskers were selected so as to differ widely in the degree of fluctuation in their envelopes. The masker with the largest amplitude fluctuations exhibited greater forward-masking ability than other stimuli; this effect was observed on the high-frequency branch and within the tip region of the tuning curve. It is suggested that differences in masking ability may reflect the use of different signal detection cues. The results are also consistent with previous reports [D. Johnson-Davies and R.D. Patterson, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 65, 756-770 (1979); B.J. O'Loughlin and B.C.J. Moore, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 69, 1119-1125 (1981a)] which suggest that off-frequency listening is a factor contributing to the sharpness of psychophysical tuning curves. This effect is largely dependent, however, on the envelope characteristics of both variable and stationary maskers.     

Indications for temporal fine structure contribution to co-modulation masking release

The contribution of temporal fine structure (TFS) information to co-modulation masking release (CMR) was examined by comparing CMR obtained with unprocessed or vocoded stimuli. Tone thresholds were measured in the presence of a sinusoidally amplitude-modulated on-frequency band (OFB) of noise and zero, two, or four flanking bands (FBs) of noise whose envelopes were either co- or anti-modulated with the OFB envelope. Vocoding replaced the TFS of the tone and masker with unrelated TFS of noise or sinusoidal carriers. Maximum CMR of 11 dB was found as the difference between the co- and anti-modulated conditions for unprocessed stimuli. After vocoding, tone thresholds increased by 7 dB, and CMR was reduced to about 4 dB but remained significant. The magnitude of CMR was similar for both the sine and the noise vocoder. Co-modulation improved detection in the vocoded condition despite the absence of the tone-masker TFS interactions; thus CMR appears to be a robust mechanism based on across-frequency processing. TFS information appears to contribute to across-channel CMR since the magnitude of CMR was significantly reduced after vocoding. Since CMR was evidenced despite vocoding, it is hoped that co-modulation would also improve detection in cochlear-implant listening.