Estimating output gains by means of Luenberger efficiency measures

In this paper we propose a new measure of input allocative efficiency that we estimate using directional distance functions. Our new measure compares the gain in output if a firm reduces technical inefficiency for the direct production possibility set and the gain in output if the firm reduces technical inefficiency for the indirect production possibility set. Because the directional distance function uses a translated origin, the gain in output from an optimal reallocation of inputs can be estimated for non-radial expansions in output. We estimate efficiency for Japanese banks during 1992–1999. The gains in outputs from reducing allocative inefficiency by reallocating inputs are greater than the gains in outputs that can be attained by reducing technical inefficiency.     

Estimating output allocative efficiency and productivity change: Application to Japanese banks

A new measure of output allocative efficiency is developed by comparing the input technical efficiency of a firm for the direct input requirement set and the indirect input requirement set proposed by Shephard [Indirect Production Functions, Verlag Anton Hain, Meisenheim Am Glan]. The ratio of the direct and indirect input quasi-distance functions serves as the measure of output allocative efficiency. As such, it measures the ratio of potential to actual inputs if the firm had chosen the revenue maximizing output mix. Using panel data on Japanese banks operating during 1992–1996 productivity growth is measured and decomposed into changes in output allocative efficiency, changes in input technical efficiency, and technical change. During the period, Japanese banks experienced productivity declines averaging 2% per year and could have used only 78–93% of actual inputs if they had chosen the revenue maximizing output mix.     

Developing a decomposable measure of profit efficiency using DEA

In for-profit organizations efficiency measurement with reference to the potential for profit augmentation is particularly important as is its decomposition into technical, and allocative components. Different profit efficiency approaches can be found in the literature to measure and decompose overall profit efficiency. In this paper, we highlight some problems within existing approaches and propose a new measure of profit efficiency based on a geometric mean of input/output adjustments needed for maximizing profits. Overall profit efficiency is calculated through this efficiency measure and is decomposed into its technical and allocative components. Technical efficiency is calculated based on a non-oriented geometric distance function (GDF) that is able to incorporate all the sources of inefficiency, while allocative efficiency is retrieved residually. We also define a measure of profitability efficiency which complements profit efficiency in that it makes it possible to retrieve the scale efficiency of a unit as a component of its profitability efficiency. In addition, the measure of profitability efficiency allows for a dual profitability interpretation of the GDF measure of technical efficiency. The concepts introduced in the paper are illustrated using a numerical example.     

Single-Period Markowitz Portfolio Selection,Performance Gauging,and Duality: A Variation on the Luenberger Shortage Function

The Markowitz portfolio theory (Ref. 1) has stimulated research into the efficiency of portfolio management. This paper studies existing nonparametric efficiency measurement approaches for single-period portfolio selection from a theoretical perspective and generalizes currently used efficiency measures into the full mean-variance space. We introduce the efficiency improvement possibility function (a variation on the shortage function), study its axiomatic properties in the context of the Markowitz efficient frontier, and establish a link to the indirect mean-variance utility function. This framework allows distinguishing between portfolio efficiency and allocative efficiency; furthermore, it permits retrieving information about the revealed risk aversion of investors. The efficiency improvement possibility function provides a more general framework for gauging the efficiency of portfolio management using nonparametric frontier envelopment methods based on quadratic optimization.     

Allocative efficiency of technically inefficient production units

We discuss how to measure allocative efficiency without presuming technical efficiency. This is relevant when it is easier to introduce reallocations than improvements of technical efficiency. We compare the approach to the traditional one of assuming technical efficiency before measuring allocative efficiency. In particular, we develop necessary and sufficient conditions in the technology to ensure consistent measures, we suggest alternative interpretations of the approaches, and we relate them to motivational and organizational change perspectives.     

Cost,revenue and profit efficiency measurement in DEA: A directional distance function approach

Estimation of efficiency of firms in a non-competitive market characterized by heterogeneous inputs and outputs along with their varying prices is questionable when factor-based technology sets are used in data envelopment analysis (DEA). In this scenario, a value-based technology becomes an appropriate reference technology against which efficiency can be assessed. In this contribution, the value-based models of Tone (2002) are extended in a directional DEA set up to develop new directional cost- and revenue-based measures of efficiency, which are then decomposed into their respective directional value-based technical and allocative efficiencies. These new directional value-based measures are more general, and include the existing value-based measures as special cases. These measures satisfy several desirable properties of an ideal efficiency measure. These new measures are advantageous over the existing ones in terms of (1) their ability to satisfy the most important property of translation invariance; (2) choices over the use of suitable direction vectors in handling negative data; and (3) flexibility in providing the decision makers with the option of specifying preferable direction vectors to incorporate their preferences. Finally, under the condition of no prior unit price information, a directional value-based measure of profit inefficiency is developed for firms whose underlying objectives are profit maximization. For an illustrative empirical application, our new measures are applied to a real-life data set of 50 US banks to draw inferences about the production correspondence of banking industry.     

A DEA approach to derive individual lower and upper bounds for the technical and allocative components of the overall profit efficiency

In this paper, we propose a slack-based data envelopment analysis approach to be used in economic efficiency analyses when the objective is profit maximization. The focus is on the measurement of the technical component of the overall efficiency with the purpose of guaranteeing the achievement of the Pareto efficiency. As a result, we will be able to estimate correctly the allocative component in the sense that this latter only reflects the improvements that can be accomplished by reallocations along the Pareto-efficient frontier. Some new measures of technical and allocative efficiency in terms of both profit ratios and differences of profits are defined. We do not make any assumption on the way the technical efficiency is to be measured, that is, we do not use, for example, either a hyperbolic measure or a directional distance function, which allows us to extend this approach and derive individual lower and upper bounds for these efficiency components. To do it, we use novel models of minimum distance to the frontier. This broadens the range of possibilities for the explanation of the overall efficiency in terms of technical and allocative inefficiencies.     

Incorporating performance measures with target levels in data envelopment analysis

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a technique for evaluating relative efficiencies of peer decision making units (DMUs) which have multiple performance measures. These performance measures have to be classified as either inputs or outputs in DEA. DEA assumes that higher output levels and/or lower input levels indicate better performance. This study is motivated by the fact that there are performance measures (or factors) that cannot be classified as an input or output, because they have target levels with which all DMUs strive to achieve in order to attain the best practice, and any deviations from the target levels are not desirable and may indicate inefficiency. We show how such performance measures with target levels can be incorporated in DEA. We formulate a new production possibility set by extending the standard DEA production possibility set under variable returns-to-scale assumption based on a set of axiomatic properties postulated to suit the case of targeted factors. We develop three efficiency measures by extending the standard radial, slacks-based, and Nerlove–Luenberger measures. We illustrate the proposed model and efficiency measures by applying them to the efficiency evaluation of 36 US universities.     

Convexity,quality and efficiency in education

While Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) has many attractions as a technique for analysing the efficiency of educational organisations, such as schools and universities, care must be taken in its use whenever its assumption of convexity of the prevailing technology and associated production possibility set may not hold. In particular, if the convexity assumption does not hold, DEA may overstate the scope for improvements in technical efficiency through proportional increases in all educational outputs and understate the importance of improvements in allocative efficiency from changing the educational output mix. The paper therefore examines conditions under which the convexity assumption is not guaranteed, particularly when the performance evaluation includes measures related to the assessed quality of the educational outputs. Under such conditions, there is a need to deploy other educational efficiency assessment tools, including an alternative non-parametric output-orientated technique and a more explicit valuation function for educational outputs, in order to estimate the shape of the efficiency frontier and both technical and allocative efficiency.     

The weighted Russell measure of technical efficiency

Theoretical consideration of technical efficiency has existed since Koopmans [10] defined it for production possibilities for which it is not possible to increase any output without simultaneously increasing any input, ceteris paribus. The nonparametric approach to efficiency measurement known as Data Envelopment Analysis is based on the index of Farrell [9], which measures radial reduction in all inputs consistent with observed output. Even after Farrell efficiency is achieved, however, there may exist additional slack in individual inputs, suggesting that the Farrell index does not necessarily measure Koopmans inefficiency. To solve this problem, the non-radial Russell measure was introduced. This paper shows that problems may arise with the Russell measure due to restrictive assumptions on the implicit weighting of inputs and outputs. This paper develops a new measure, the Weighted Russell measure, that relaxes this assumption. Using simulated data, the new measure is shown to be preferred to existing methods. In addition, the new method is applied to analyze the performance of New York State school districts.     

Estimating indirect allocative inefficiency and productivity change

Building on the method used in previous indirect production studies, we construct an indicator of indirect output allocative inefficiency. Our indicator equals the difference between a revenue-constrained directional input distance function and a directional input distance function that depends on outputs, rather than revenue. The indicator measures the overuse of inputs that occurs when firms do not choose a revenue maximizing mix of outputs. Adding a time dimension allows productivity change to be measured. In an empirical illustration of our method we find that Japanese banks use, between 2% and 7%, too many inputs because bank outputs are inefficiently allocated.     

Assessing the technical and allocative efficiency of hospital operations in Greece and its resource allocation implications

In this paper, we seek to develop a research framework concerning the assessment of the efficiency of public sector hospital operations. Public hospitals are increasingly under pressure to improve their operations both in terms of resources they use and also in terms of the quantity and quality of their outcomes. The assessment of efficiency entails both the notions of technical and allocative efficiency as they yield complementary information about the management effectiveness of individual hospitals. Technical efficiency has a diagnostic purpose as it yields comparative information about the effectiveness with which individual units convert their input resources into outputs. On the other hand allocative efficiency has a planning orientation since the objective of the assessment is to gauge efficiency improvements by means of resource reallocation. A linear programming based model is proposed for assessing allocative efficiency in the light of uncertainty about the prices of input factors. The empirical part of the paper is based on data from Greek public hospitals. Results and policy implications are discussed based on data from 98 general hospitals based on information from 1992. It was found that significant inefficiencies are present in the operations of Greek hospitals that account approximately for 100 MEcu in 1992 prices.     

Resolving a strange case of efficiency

In a recent paper in the Journal of the Operational Research Society, Tone proposes an alternative to the Farrell cost efficiency index to avoid the ‘strange case’ problem in which firms with identical inputs and outputs but with input prices differing by some factor (eg, one has input prices twice another) will have the same Farrell cost efficiency. We provide an alternative cost efficiency indicator that avoids this problem, allows for decomposition into technical and allocative efficiency, and is easily estimated using DEA type models.     

A modification of the certainty measure to handle subnormal distributions

We suggest a modification of the definition of certainty associated with a possibility distribution so that we are assured that the certainty measure is always less than or equal to the possibility measure even in the face of subnormal distributions. We note that when the possibility distribution is normal this new definition reduces to the original definition of certainty. We use this new measure along with the definition of possibility measure to obtain measures of belief and plausibility in the fact of fuzzy information in the Mathematical Theory of Evidence.     

A generalized DEA model for centralized resource allocation

In this paper, we introduced a new generalized centralized resource allocation model which extends Lozano and Villa’s and Asmild et al.’s models to a more general case. In order to uncover the sources of such total input contraction in the generalized centralized resource allocation model, we applied the structural efficiency to further decompose it into three components: the aggregate technical efficiency, the aggregate allocative efficiency and re-transferable efficiency components. The proposed models are not only flexible enough for the central decision-maker to adjust the inputs and outputs to achieve the total input contraction but also identify the sources of such total input contraction, thereby giving rise to an important interpretation and understanding of the generalized centralized resource allocation model. Finally, an empirical example is used to illustrate the approach.     

Estimating technical and allocative efficiency in the public sector: A nonparametric analysis of Dutch schools

Public sector output provision is influenced not only by discretionary inputs but also by exogenous environmental factors. In this paper, we extended the literature by developing a conditional DEA estimator of allocative efficiency that allows a decomposition of overall cost efficiency into allocative and technical components while simultaneously controlling for the environment. We apply the model to analyze technical and allocative efficiency of Dutch secondary schools. The results reveal that allocative efficiency represents a significant 37 percent of overall cost efficiency on average, although technical inefficiency is still the dominant part. Furthermore, the results show that the impact of environment largely differs between schools and that having a more unfavorable environment is very expensive to schools. These results highlight the importance of including environmental variables in both technical and allocative efficiency analysis.     

基于灰色Malmquist-DEA的中国粮食生产效率分析

选取全国各省粮食生产指标面板数据,对数据进行灰色拟合处理,采用数据包络分析(DEA)法,测算各区域的粮食生产效率,得到投入产出体系的要素冗余值;同时测算了各区域的全要素生产率,并对Malmquist指数进行分解,分析各区域的效率变化和技术变化趋势.结果显示:东、西部地区粮食生产投入要素大量冗余,要素配置效率不高,中部地区要素利用率较高,要素配置趋于合理;效率变化对全要素生产率的作用不明显,而技术进步是全要素生产率增长的关键驱动因素.     

A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis

In this paper, we will propose a slacks-based measure (SBM) of efficiency in Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). This scalar measure deals directly with the input excesses and the output shortfalls of the decision making unit (DMU) concerned. It is units invariant and monotone decreasing with respect to input excess and output shortfall. Furthermore, this measure is determined only by consulting the reference-set of the DMU and is not affected by statistics over the whole data set. The new measure has a close connection with other measures proposed so far, e.g., Charnes–Cooper–Rhodes (CCR), Banker–Charnes–Cooper (BCC) and the Russell measure of efficiency. The dual side of this model can be interpreted as profit maximization, in contrast to the ratio maximization of the CCR model. Numerical experiments show its validity as an efficiency measurement tool and its compatibility with other measures of efficiency.     

Decomposing technical inefficiency using the principle of least action

In for-profit organizations, profit efficiency decomposition is considered important since estimates on profit drivers are of practical use to managers in their decision making. Profit efficiency is traditionally due to two sources – technical efficiency and allocative efficiency. The contribution of this paper is a novel decomposition of technical efficiency that could be more practical to use if the firm under evaluation really wants to achieve technical efficiency as soon as possible. For this purpose, we show how a new version of the Measure of Inefficiency Proportions (MIP), which seeks the minimization of the total technical effort by the assessed firm, is a lower bound of the value of technical inefficiency associated with the directional distance function. The targets provided by the new MIP could be beneficial for firms since it specifies how firms may become technically efficient simply by decreasing one input or increasing one output, suggesting that each firm should focus its effort on a specific dimension (input or output). This approach is operationalized in a data envelopment analysis framework and applied to a dataset of airlines.