Rainbow Connection in 3-Connected Graphs

An edge-colored graph G is rainbow connected if any two vertices are connected by a path whose edges have distinct colors. The rainbow connection number of a connected graph G, denoted by rc(G), is the smallest number of colors that are needed in order to make G rainbow connected. In this paper, we proved that rc(G) ≤ 3(n + 1)/5 for all 3-connected graphs.     

Rainbow Connection Number of Graph Power and Graph Products

Rainbow connection number, rc(G), of a connected graph G is the minimum number of colors needed to color its edges so that every pair of vertices is connected by at least one path in which no two edges are colored the same (note that the coloring need not be proper). In this paper we study the rainbow connection number with respect to three important graph product operations (namely the Cartesian product, the lexicographic product and the strong product) and the operation of taking the power of a graph. In this direction, we show that if G is a graph obtained by applying any of the operations mentioned above on non-trivial graphs, then rc(G) ≤ 2r(G) + c, where r(G) denotes the radius of G and \({c \in \{0, 1, 2\}}\) . In general the rainbow connection number of a bridgeless graph can be as high as the square of its radius [1]. This is an attempt to identify some graph classes which have rainbow connection number very close to the obvious lower bound of diameter (and thus the radius). The bounds reported are tight up to additive constants. The proofs are constructive and hence yield polynomial time \({(2 + \frac{2}{r(G)})}\) -factor approximation algorithms.     

Upper Bounds for the Rainbow Connection Numbers of Line Graphs

A path in an edge-colored graph G, where adjacent edges may be colored the same, is called a rainbow path if no two edges of it are colored the same. A nontrivial connected graph G is rainbow connected if for any two vertices of G there is a rainbow path connecting them. The rainbow connection number of G, denoted rc(G), is defined as the smallest number of colors such that G is rainbow connected. In this paper, we mainly study the rainbow connection number rc(L(G)) of the line graph L(G) of a graph G which contains triangles. We get two sharp upper bounds for rc(L(G)), in terms of the number of edge-disjoint triangles of G. We also give results on the iterated line graphs.     

Nordhaus–Gaddum-Type Theorem for Rainbow Connection Number of Graphs

An edge-colored graph G is rainbow connected if every two vertices of G are connected by a path whose edges have distinct colors. The rainbow connection number of G, denoted by rc(G), is the minimum number of colors that are needed to make G rainbow connected. In this paper we give a Nordhaus–Gaddum-type result for the rainbow connection number. We prove that if G and ${\overline{G}}$ are both connected, then ${4\leq rc(G)+rc(\overline{G})\leq n+2}$ . Examples are given to show that the upper bound is sharp for n ≥ 4, and the lower bound is sharp for n ≥ 8. Sharp lower bounds are also given for n = 4, 5, 6, 7, respectively.     

Rainbow Connection Number, Bridges and Radius

Let G be a connected graph. The notion of rainbow connection number rc(G) of a graph G was introduced by Chartrand et al. (Math Bohem 133:85–98, 2008). Basavaraju et al. (arXiv:1011.0620v1 [math.CO], 2010) proved that for every bridgeless graph G with radius r, ${rc(G)\leq r(r+2)}$ and the bound is tight. In this paper, we show that for a connected graph G with radius r and center vertex u, if we let D ^r  = {u}, then G has r?1 connected dominating sets ${ D^{r-1}, D^{r-2},\ldots, D^{1}}$ such that ${D^{r} \subset D^{r-1} \subset D^{r-2} \cdots\subset D^{1} \subset D^{0}=V(G)}$ and ${rc(G)\leq \sum_{i=1}^{r} \max \{2i+1,b_i\}}$ , where b _i is the number of bridges in E[D ⁱ , N(D ⁱ )] for ${1\leq i \leq r}$ . From the result, we can get that if ${b_i\leq 2i+1}$ for all ${1\leq i\leq r}$ , then ${rc(G)\leq \sum_{i=1}^{r}(2i+1)= r(r+2)}$ ; if b _i  > 2i + 1 for all ${1\leq i\leq r}$ , then ${rc(G)= \sum_{i=1}^{r}b_i}$ , the number of bridges of G. This generalizes the result of Basavaraju et al. In addition, an example is given to show that there exist infinitely graphs with bridges whose rc(G) is only dependent on the radius of G, and another example is given to show that there exist infinitely graphs with bridges whose rc(G) is only dependent on the number of bridges in G.     

Tutte’s 5-flow conjecture for highly cyclically connected cubic graphs

In 1954, Tutte conjectured that every bridgeless graph has a nowhere-zero 5-flow. Let ω(G) be the minimum number of odd cycles in a 2-factor of a bridgeless cubic graph G. Tutte’s conjecture is equivalent to its restriction to cubic graphs with ω≥2. We show that if a cubic graph G has no edge cut with fewer than edges that separates two odd cycles of a minimum 2-factor of G, then G has a nowhere-zero 5-flow. This implies that if a cubic graph G is cyclically n-edge connected and , then G has a nowhere-zero 5-flow.     

Sphere coverings and identifying codes

In any connected, undirected graph G = (V, E), the distance d(x, y) between two vertices x and y of G is the minimum number of edges in a path linking x to y in G. A sphere in G is a set of the form S _r (x) = {y ∈ V : d(x, y) = r}, where x is a vertex and r is a nonnegative integer called the radius of the sphere. We first address in this paper the following question: What is the minimum number of spheres with fixed radius r ≥ 0 required to cover all the vertices of a finite, connected, undirected graph G? We then turn our attention to the Hamming Hypercube of dimension n, and we show that the minimum number of spheres with any radii required to cover this graph is either n or n + 1, depending on the parity of n. We also relate the two above problems to other questions in combinatorics, in particular to identifying codes.     

The rainbow connection of a graph is (at most) reciprocal to its minimum degree

An edge‐colored graph Gis rainbow edge‐connected if any two vertices are connected by a path whose edges have distinct colors. The rainbow connection of a connected graph G, denoted by rc(G), is the smallest number of colors that are needed in order to make Grainbow edge‐connected. We prove that if Ghas nvertices and minimum degree δ then rc(G)<20n/δ. This solves open problems from Y. Caro, A. Lev, Y. Roditty, Z. Tuza, and R. Yuster (Electron J Combin 15 (2008), #R57) and S. Chakrborty, E. Fischer, A. Matsliah, and R. Yuster (Hardness and algorithms for rainbow connectivity, Freiburg (2009), pp. 243–254). A vertex‐colored graph Gis rainbow vertex‐connected if any two vertices are connected by a path whose internal vertices have distinct colors. The rainbow vertex‐connection of a connected graph G, denoted by rvc(G), is the smallest number of colors that are needed in order to make Grainbow vertex‐connected. One cannot upper‐bound one of these parameters in terms of the other. Nevertheless, we prove that if Ghas nvertices and minimum degree δ then rvc(G)<11n/δ. We note that the proof in this case is different from the proof for the edge‐colored case, and we cannot deduce one from the other. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 63: 185–191, 2010     

On a conjecture of the Randi? index

The Randi? index of a graph G is defined as , where d(u) is the degree of vertex u and the summation goes over all pairs of adjacent vertices u, v. A conjecture on R(G) for connected graph G is as follows: R(G)≥r(G)−1, where r(G) denotes the radius of G. We proved that the conjecture is true for biregular graphs, connected graphs with order n≤10 and tricyclic graphs.     

An Implicit Degree Condition for Pancyclicity of Graphs

Zhu, Li and Deng introduced in 1989 the definition of implicit degree of a vertex v in a graph G, denoted by id(v), by using the degrees of the vertices in its neighborhood and the second neighborhood. And they obtained sufficient conditions with implicit degrees for a graph to be hamiltonian. In this paper, we prove that if G is a 2–connected graph of order n ≥ 3 such that id(v) ≥ n/2 for each vertex v of G, then G is pancyclic unless G is bipartite, or else n = 4r, r ≥ 2 and G is in a class of graphs F _4r defined in the paper.     

Bounds on the 2-Rainbow Domination Number of Graphs

A 2-rainbow domination function of a graph G is a function f that assigns to each vertex a set of colors chosen from the set {1, 2}, such that for any ${v\in V(G), f(v)=\emptyset}$ implies ${\bigcup_{u\in N(v)}f(u)=\{1,2\}.}$ The 2-rainbow domination number γ _r2(G) of a graph G is the minimum ${w(f)=\Sigma_{v\in V}|f(v)|}$ over all such functions f. Let G be a connected graph of order |V(G)| = n ≥ 3. We prove that γ _r2(G) ≤ 3n/4 and we characterize the graphs achieving equality. We also prove a lower bound for 2-rainbow domination number of a tree using its domination number. Some other lower and upper bounds of γ _r2(G) in terms of diameter are also given.     

Polynomial algorithm for sharp upper bound of rainbow connection number of maximal outerplanar graphs

For a finite simple edge-colored connected graph G (the coloring may not be proper), a rainbow path in G is a path without two edges colored the same; G is rainbow connected if for any two vertices of G, there is a rainbow path connecting them. Rainbow connection number, rc(G), of G is the minimum number of colors needed to color its edges such that G is rainbow connected. Chakraborty et al. (2011) [5] proved that computing rc(G) is NP-hard and deciding if rc(G)=2 is NP-complete. When edges of G are colored with fixed number k of colors, Kratochvil [6] proposed a question: what is the complexity of deciding whether G is rainbow connected? is this an FPT problem? In this paper, we prove that any maximal outerplanar graph is k rainbow connected for suitably large k and can be given a rainbow coloring in polynomial time.     

Some results on the spectral radii of bicyclic graphs

A bicyclic graph is a connected graph in which the number of edges equals the number of vertices plus one. Let Δ(G) and ρ(G) denote the maximum degree and the spectral radius of a graph G, respectively. Let B(n) be the set of bicyclic graphs on n vertices, and B(n,Δ)={G∈B(n)∣Δ(G)=Δ}. When Δ≥(n+3)/2 we characterize the graph which alone maximizes the spectral radius among all the graphs in B(n,Δ). It is also proved that for two graphs G₁ and G₂ in B(n), if Δ(G₁)>Δ(G₂) and Δ(G₁)≥⌈7n/9⌉+9, then ρ(G₁)>ρ(G₂).     

Bipartite rainbow numbers of matchings

Given two graphs G and H, let f(G,H) denote the maximum number c for which there is a way to color the edges of G with c colors such that every subgraph H of G has at least two edges of the same color. Equivalently, any edge-coloring of G with at least rb(G,H)=f(G,H)+1 colors contains a rainbow copy of H, where a rainbow subgraph of an edge-colored graph is such that no two edges of it have the same color. The number rb(G,H) is called the rainbow number ofHwith respect toG, and simply called the bipartite rainbow number ofH if G is the complete bipartite graph K_m,n. Erd?s, Simonovits and Sós showed that rb(K_n,K₃)=n. In 2004, Schiermeyer determined the rainbow numbers rb(K_n,K_k) for all n≥k≥4, and the rainbow numbers rb(K_n,kK₂) for all k≥2 and n≥3k+3. In this paper we will determine the rainbow numbers rb(K_m,n,kK₂) for all k≥1.     

Some graft transformations and its applications on the distance spectral radius of a graph

Let D(G)=(d_i,j)_n×n denote the distance matrix of a connected graph G with order n, where d_ij is equal to the distance between v_i and v_j in G. The largest eigenvalue of D(G) is called the distance spectral radius of graph G, denoted by ?(G). In this paper, some graft transformations that decrease or increase ?(G) are given. With them, for the graphs with both order n and k pendant vertices, the extremal graphs with the minimum distance spectral radius are completely characterized; the extremal graph with the maximum distance spectral radius is shown to be a dumbbell graph (obtained by attaching some pendant edges to each pendant vertex of a path respectively) when 2≤k≤n−2; for k=1,2,3,n−1, the extremal graphs with the maximum distance spectral radius are completely characterized.     

Group Connectivity of Bridged Graphs

Let G be a 2-edge-connected simple graph, and let A denote an abelian group with the identity element 0. If a graph G ^* is obtained by repeatedly contracting nontrivial A-connected subgraphs of G until no such a subgraph left, we say G can be A-reduced to G*. A graph G is bridged if every cycle of length at least 4 has two vertices x, y such that d _G (x, y) < d _C (x, y). In this paper, we investigate the group connectivity number Λ _g (G) = min{n: G is A-connected for every abelian group with |A| ≥ n} for bridged graphs. Our results extend the early theorems for chordal graphs by Lai (Graphs Comb 16:165–176, 2000) and Chen et al. (Ars Comb 88:217–227, 2008).     

Nowhere-Zero 5-Flows and Even (1,2)-Factors

A graph G = (V, E) admits a nowhere-zero k-flow if there exists an orientation H = (V, A) of G and an integer flow ${\varphi:A \to \mathbb{Z}}$ such that for all ${a \in A, 0 < |\varphi(a)| < k}$ . Tutte conjectured that every bridgeless graphs admits a nowhere-zero 5-flow. A (1,2)-factor of G is a set ${F \subseteq E}$ such that the degree of any vertex v in the subgraph induced by F is 1 or 2. Let us call an edge of G, F-balanced if either it belongs to F or both its ends have the same degree in F. Call a cycle of G F-even if it has an even number of F-balanced edges. A (1,2)-factor F of G is even if each cycle of G is F-even. The main result of the paper is that a cubic graph G admits a nowhere-zero 5-flow if and only if G has an even (1,2)-factor.     

Spanning Star Trees in Regular Graphs

For a subset W of vertices of an undirected graph G, let S(W) be the subgraph consisting of W, all edges incident to at least one vertex in W, and all vertices adjacent to at least one vertex in W. If S(W) is a tree containing all the vertices of G, then we call it a spanning star tree of G. In this case W forms a weakly connected but strongly acyclic dominating set for G. We prove that for every r ≥ 3, there exist r-regular n-vertex graphs that have spanning star trees, and there exist r-regular n-vertex graphs that do not have spanning star trees, for all n sufficiently large (in terms of r). Furthermore, the problem of determining whether a given regular graph has a spanning star tree is NP-complete.     

Neighbor Sum Distinguishing Index

We consider proper edge colorings of a graph G using colors of the set {1, . . . , k}. Such a coloring is called neighbor sum distinguishing if for any pair of adjacent vertices x and y the sum of colors taken on the edges incident to x is different from the sum of colors taken on the edges incident to y. The smallest value of k in such a coloring of G is denoted by ndi_Σ(G). In the paper we conjecture that for any connected graph G ≠ C ₅ of order n ≥ 3 we have ndi_Σ(G) ≤ Δ(G) + 2. We prove this conjecture for several classes of graphs. We also show that ndi_Σ(G) ≤ 7Δ(G)/2 for any graph G with Δ(G) ≥ 2 and ndi_Σ(G) ≤ 8 if G is cubic.     

Graphs with small total rainbow connection number

A total-colored path is total rainbow if its edges and internal vertices have distinct colors. A total-colored graph G is total rainbow connected if any two distinct vertices are connected by some total rainbow path. The total rainbow connection number of G, denoted by trc(G), is the smallest number of colors required to color the edges and vertices of G in order to make G total rainbow connected. In this paper, we investigate graphs with small total rainbow connection number. First, for a connected graph G, we prove that \({\text{trc(G) = 3 if}}\left( {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{n - 1} \\2\end{array}} \right) + 1 \leqslant \left| {{\text{E(G)}}} \right| \leqslant \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}n \\2\end{array}} \right) - 1\), and \({\text{trc(G)}} \leqslant {\text{6 if }}\left| {{\text{E(G)}}} \right| \geqslant \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{n - 2} \\2\end{array}} \right) + 2\). Next, we investigate the total rainbow connection numbers of graphs G with |V(G)| = n, diam(G) ≥ 2, and clique number ω(G) = n ? s for 1 ≤ s ≤ 3. In this paper, we find Theorem 3 of [Discuss. Math. Graph Theory, 2011, 31(2): 313–320] is not completely correct, and we provide a complete result for this theorem.