Metal Derivatives of Heterocyclic‐2‐thiones: Crystal Structures of [Bis(diphenylphosphanyl)propane][bis(pyrimidine‐2‐thiolato)]ruthenium(II) and [Bis(diphenylphosphanyl)methane][bis(pyridine‐2‐thiolato)]ruthenium(II)

Ruthenium(II) Complexes containing pyrimidine‐2‐thiolate (pymS^–) and bis(diphenylphosphanyl)alkanes [Ph₂P–(CH₂)_m–PPh₂, m = 1, dppm; m = 2, dppe; m = 3, dppp; m = 4, dppb] are described. Reactions of [RuCl₂L₂] (L = dppm, dppp) and [Ru₂Cl₄L₃] (L = dppb) with pyrimidine‐2‐thione (pymSH) in 1:2 molar ratio in dry benzene in the presence of Et₃N base yielded the [Ru(pymS)₂L] complexes (pymS^– = pyrimidine‐2‐thiolate; L = dppm ( 1 ); dppp ( 3 ); dppb ( 4 )). The complex [Ru(pymS)₂(dppe)] ( 2 ) was indirectly prepared by the reaction of [Ru(pymS)₂(PPh₃)₂] with dppe. These complexes were characterized using analytical data, IR, ¹H, ¹³C, ³¹P NMR spectroscopy, and X‐ray crystallography (complex 3 ). The crystal structure of the analogous complex [Ru(pyS)₂(dppm)] ( 5 ) with the ligand pyridine‐2‐thiolate (pyS^–) was also described. X‐ray crystallographic investigation of complex 3 has shown two four‐membered chelate rings (N, S donors) and one six‐membered ring (P, P donors) around the metal atom. Compound 5 provides the first example in which Ru^II has three four‐membered chelate rings: two made up by N, S donor ligands and one made up by P, P donor ligand. The arrangement around the metal atoms in each complex is distorted octahedral with cis:cis:trans:P, P:N, N:S, S dispositions of the donor atoms. The ³¹P NMR spectroscopic data revealed that the complexes are static in solution, except 2 , which showed the presence of more than one species.     

Zur Reaktivität von dinuklearen Platina‐β‐diketonen gegenüber Phosphanen: Diacetylplatin(II)‐Komplexe und mononukleare Platina‐β‐diketone

The Reactivity of Dinuclear Platina‐β‐diketones with Phosphines: Diacetylplatinum(II) Complexes and Mononuclear Platina‐β‐diketones Addition of mono‐ and bidentate phosphines or of AsPh₃ to the platina‐β‐diketone [Pt₂{(COMe)₂H}₂(μ‐Cl)₂] ( 1 ) followed by the addition of NaOMe at ?70 °C resulted in the formation of diacetyl platinum(II) complexes cis‐[Pt(COMe)₂L₂] (L = PPh₃, 2a ; P(4‐FC₆H₄)₃, 2b ; PPh₂(4‐py), 2c ; PMePh₂, 2d ; AsPh₃, 2d ) and [Pt(COMe)₂(L??L)] (L??L = dppe, 3b ; dppp, 3c ), respectively. The analogous reaction with dppm afforded the dinuclear complex cis‐[{Pt(COMe)₂}₂(μ‐dppm)₂] ( 4 ) that reacted in boiling acetone yielding [Pt(COMe)₂(dppm)] ( 3a ). The reactions 1 → 2 / 3 were found to proceed via thermally highly unstable cationic mononuclear platina‐β‐diketone intermediates [Pt{(COMe)₂H}L₂]⁺ and [Pt{(COMe)₂H}(L??L)]⁺, respectively, that could be isolated as chlorides for L??L = dppe ( 5a ) and dppp ( 5b ). The reversibility of the deprotonation of type 5 complexes with NaOMe yielding type 3 complexes was shown by the protonation of the diacetyl complex 3b with HBF₄ yielding the platina‐β‐diketone [Pt{(COMe)₂H}(dppe)](BF₄) ( 5c ). All compounds were fully characterized by means of NMR and IR spectroscopies, and microanalyses. X‐ray diffraction analysis was performed for the complex cis‐[Pt(COMe)₂(PPh₃)₂]·H₂O·CHCl₃ ( 2a ·H₂O·CHCl₃).     

Sterically‐Directed Consecutive and Size‐Selective Self‐Assembly of Palladium Diphosphane Complexes with an Ar‐BIAN Ligand: Unexpected Formation of Pentameric and Hexameric Aggregates

The coordination properties of N,N′‐bis[4‐(4‐pyridyl)phenyl]acenaphthenequinonediimine (L¹) and N,N′‐bis[4‐(2‐pyridyl)phenyl]acenaphthenequinonediimine (L²) were investigated in self‐assembly with palladium diphosphane complexes [Pd(P^P)(H₂O)₂](OTf)₂ (OTf=triflate) by using various analytical techniques, including multinuclear (¹H, ¹⁵N, and ³¹P) NMR spectroscopy and mass spectrometry (P^P=dppp, dppf, dppe; dppp=bis(diphenylphosphanyl)propane, dppf= bis(diphenylphosphanyl)ferrocene, and dppe=bis(diphenylphosphanyl)ethane). Beside the expected trimeric and tetrameric species, the interaction of an equimolar mixture of [Pd(dppp)]²⁺ ions and L¹ also generates pentameric aggregates. Due to the E/Z isomerism of L¹, a dimeric product was also observed. In all of these species, which correspond to the general formula [Pd(dppp)L¹]_n(OTf)_2n (n=2–5), the L¹ ligand is coordinated to the Pd center only through the terminal pyridyl groups. Introduction of a second equivalent of the [Pd(dppp)]²⁺ tecton results in coordination to the internal, sterically more encumbered chelating site and induces enhancement of the higher nuclearity components. The presence of higher‐order aggregates (n=5, 6), which were unexpected for the interaction of cis‐protected palladium corners with linear ditopic bridging ligands, has been demonstrated both by mass‐spectrometric and DOSY NMR spectroscopic analysis. The sequential coordination of the [Pd(dppp)]²⁺ ion is attributed to the dissimilar steric properties of the two coordination sites. In the self‐assembled species formed in a 1:1:1 mixture of [Pd(dppp)]²⁺/[Pd(dppe)]²⁺/L¹, the sterically more demanding [Pd(dppp)]²⁺ tectons are attached selectively to the pyridyl groups, whereas the more hindered imino nitrogen atoms coordinate the less bulky dppe complexes, thus resulting in a sterically directed, size‐selective sorting of the metal tectons. The propensity of the new ligands to incorporate hydrogen‐bonded solvent molecules at the chelating site was confirmed by X‐ray diffraction studies.     

Investigation of Complexes of Diphenylphosphine Derivatives by Thermal and Other Physicochemical Methods of Analyses

Six heteroatomic complexes of diphenylphosphine derivatives with heavy metals (Ni, Pd, Pt, Mo and W) were prepared and subjected to elemental spectral and thermal analyses. The different physicochemical methods used indicated the formulae [NiCl₂(dppm)], [PtCl₂(dppm)] and [Mo(CO)₄(dppm)] (dppm=bis(diphenylphosphine)methane, the dppm in these complexes behaving as a bidentate ligand), [Pd(CN)₂(dppm)₂] (in which the dppm behaves as a monodentate ligand), [W(CO)₄(dppe)₂] and [Mo(CO)₄(dppe)₂] (dppe=1,1-bis(diphenylphosphine)ethene, the dppe in these complexes behaving as a bidentate ligand). The thermal analyses (DTA and TG) confirmed these structures. The results of spectral and thermal analyses were compared. This revised version was published online in August 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

[Bis­(di­phenyl­phosphino)­methane][1,3-bis­(di­phenyl­phosphino)­propane]­platinum(II) dibromide

The asymmetric unit of the title compound, [Pt(C₂₅H₂₂P₂)(C₂₇H₂₆P₂)]Br₂ or [Pt(dppm)(dppp)]Br₂, where dppm is bis­(di­phenyl­phosphino)­methane and dppp is 1,3-bis­(di­phenyl­phosphino)­propane, consists of a discrete [Pt(dppm)(dppp)]²⁺ cation and two Br⁻ anions at van der Waals distances. This is the first reported platinum(II) complex containing both dppm and dppp ligands. Noticeable features are that the coordination of platinum by the differing dppm and dppp ligands produces a distorted coordination geometry with differing ligand bite angles (and to a lesser extent bond distances), and that the strain induced by the formation of the four-membered dppm chelate ring has a marked effect upon the bond angles at the P atoms of this ligand.     

Einfluß der Chelatbildner dppe und dppp auf die Bildung und die Eigenschaften der Pt-Komplexe des tBu2P–P

Coordination Chemistry of P-rich Phosphanes and Silylphosphanes. XV. Influence of the Chelate Compounds dppe and dppp on Formation and Properties of the Pt Complexes of ^tBu₂P–P The chelating ligands dppe and dppp replace the PPh₃ groups in [η²-{^tBu₂P–P}Pt(PPh₃)₂] 1 yielding [η²-{^tBu₂P–P}Pt(dppe)] 2 and [η²-{^tBu₂P–P}Pt(dppp)] 8 . However, they don't replace the phosphinophosphinidene ligand ^tBu₂P–P. dppm does not react at all with 1 . [η²-{H₂C=CH₂}Pt(dppe)] 3 yields in the presence of ^tBu₂P–P=P(Me)^tBu₂ 4 exclusively Pt(dppe)₂ 5 and elemental Pt; no 2 could be detected. Similarly, [η²-{H₂C=CH₂}Pt(dppp)] 7 reacts with 4 to give mainly Pt(dppp)₂ 9 and Pt; [η²-{tBu₂PP}Pt(PPh₃)₂] 8 is present only as a minor product. [η²-{^tBu₂P–P}Pt(dppe)] 2 crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P2₁/c (no. 14) with a = 1834.40(10) pm, b = 1679.70(10) pm, c = 1125.79(6) pm, β = 103.963(5)°.     

Metal-Containing Initiator Systems. IX. Radical Polymerizations of Vinyl Monomers by Various Metal Acetylacetonates

Abstract

A study of the polymerization of styrene, methyl methacrylate, acrylonitrile, vinyl acetate, and vinyl chloride initiated by various metal acetylacetonates [Me(acac)_x] has been made. It was found that Mn(acac)₃ was the most effective initiator, and Co(acac)₃, Mn(acac)₂, Cu(acac)₂, and Cr(acac)₃ showed moderate activity for the polymerization of methyl methacrylate at 60°C. However, the other, Me(acac)_x, had no effect or served as inhibitors. The addition of some additives such as halogen compounds did not accelerate polymerization of methyl methacrylate by Mn(acac)₃, From the results of polymerization and copolymerization of methyl methacrylate by Mn(acac)₃, it was concluded that the polymerization proceeded via an ordinary radical mechanism and the activation energy for initiation was 25.2 kcal/mole. The initiation mechanism of vinyl polymerization by Me(acac)_x was studied on the basis of the complex formation with the monomer.     

Protonation and hydrogenation of triosmium clusters containing the bridging diphosphine ligands Ph2P(CH2nPPh2 (n = 1 to 4)

Members of the series of bridging diphosphine clusters [Os₃(CO)₁₀(diphos)] where diphos = Ph₂P(CH_2nPPh₂ [dppm (n = 1), dppe (n = 2), dppp (n = 3), or dppb (n = 4)] show interesting differences in their reactivity towards H⁺ and H₂. Protonation leads to [Os₃(μ-H)(CO)₁₀(diphos)]⁺ with the hydrides bridging the same osmium atoms as the diphos ligand when diphos is dppe, dppp, or dppb, whereas the hydride and dppm bridge different edges in [Os₃9μ-H)(CO)₁₀(dppm)]⁺. Hydrogenation of the 1,2-diphos compounds leads to [Os₃(μ-H)₂(CO)₈(diphos)] (diphos = dppm, dppe, dppp) in good to excellent yield but the dppb analogue could not be made. Geometric and electronic factors affecting the ability to incorporate hydride ligands in these clusters are discussed.     

Preparation and crystallographic characterization of Pd(II) complexes containing imidobis(diphenylthiophosphinato) ligand

The reactions of PdCI₂(L-L) [L-L = Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂(dppm), Ph₂PCH₂CH₂PPh₂(dppe) and Ph₂PCH₂CH₂CH₂PPh₂(dppp)] with equivalent amount of (Ph₂P(S)NHP(S)Ph₂)(dppaS₂) gave the complexes [Pd(L-L)(dppaS₂-H)]ClO₄ [L-L = dppm (1), dppe (2), dppp (3)]. The different synthetic route was used for complex 2 by using of Pd(dppe)Cl₂ and K[N(PSPh₂)₂] as starting materials (2a). All of these complexes have been characterized ³¹P{¹H} NMR, IR and elemental analyses. The complexes 2, 2a and 3 were crystallographically characterized. The coordination geometry around the Pd atoms in these complexes distorted square planar. Six membered dppaS₂-H rings are twist boat conformations in three complexes.     

Zur Reaktivität von alkylthioverbrückten 44‐CVE‐triangularen Platinclustern: Umsetzungen mit bidentaten Phosphanliganden

On the Reactivity of Alkylthio Bridged 44 CVE Triangular Platinum Clusters: Reactions with Bidentate Phosphine Ligands The 44 cve (cluster valence electrons) triangular platinum clusters [{Pt(PR₃)}₃(μ‐SMe)₃]Cl (PR₃ = PPh₃, 2a ; P(4‐FC₆H₄)₃, 2b ; P(n‐Bu)₃, 2c ) were found to react with PPh₂CH₂PPh₂ (dppm) in a degradation reaction yielding dinuclear platinum(I) complexes [{Pt(PR₃)}₂(μ‐SMe)(μ‐dppm)]Cl (PR₃ = PPh₃, 3a ; P(4‐FC₆H₄)₃, 3b ; P(n‐Bu)₃; 3e ) and the platinum(II) complex [Pt(SMe)₂(dppm)] ( 4 ), whereas the addition of PPh₂CH₂CH₂PPh₂ (dppe) to cluster 2a afforded a mixture of degradation products, among others the complexes [Pt(dppe)₂] and [Pt(dppe)₂]Cl₂. On the other hand, the treatment of cluster 2a with PPh₂CH₂CH₂CH₂PPh₂ (dppp) ended up in the formation of the cationic complex [{Pt(dppp)}₂(μ‐SMe)₂]Cl₂ ( 5 ). Furthermore, the terminal PPh₃ ligands in complex 3a proved to be subject to substitution by the stronger donating monodentate phosphine ligands PMePh₂ and PMe₂Ph yielding the analogous complexes [{Pt(PR₃)}₂(μ‐SMe)(μ‐dppm)]Cl (PR₃ = PMePh₂, 3c ; PMe₂Ph, 3d ). NMR investigations on complexes 3 showed an inverse correlation of Tolmans electronic parameter ν with the coupling constants ¹J(Pt,P) and ¹J(Pt,Pt). All compounds were fully characterized by means of NMR and IR spectroscopy. X‐ray diffraction analyses were performed for the complexes [{Pt{P(4‐FC₆H₄)₃}}₂(μ‐SMe)(μ‐dppm)]Cl ( 3b ), [Pt(SMe)₂(dppm)] ( 4 ), and [{Pt(dppp)}₂(μ‐SMe)₂]Cl₂ ( 5 ).     

Catalytic action of metallic salts in autoxidation and polymerization. IX. Polymerization of methyl methacrylate with sodium hexanitrocobaltate(III) in mixed solvent of acetone and water

Polymerization of methyl methacrylate with some cobalt (III) complexes was carried out in various solvents and in mixed solvents of acetone and water or alcohols. Sodium hexanitrocobaltate(III) was found to be an effective initiator in mixed solvent of water and acetone. The kinetic study on the polymerization of methyl methacrylate with Na₃[Co(NO₂)₆] in a water-acetone mixed solvent gave the following over-all rate equation: R_p = 8.04 × 10⁴ exp{ ?13,500/RT} [I]^1/2[M]² (mol/1.?sec). The effects of various additives on polymerization rate and the copolymerization curve with styrene suggest that polymerization proceeds via a radical mechanism. The dependence of the polymerization rate on the square of monomer concentration and the spectroscopic data were indicative of the formation of a complex between initiator and monomer.     

Tin(II) Halide Insertion or Halogen Exchange in the Reactions of Dihaloplatinum(II) Complexes with Tin(II) Halide

Reactions of SnCl₂ with the complexes cis‐[PtCl₂(P₂)] (P₂=dppf (1,1′‐bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene), dppp (1,3‐bis(diphenylphosphino)propane=1,1′‐(propane‐1,3‐diyl)bis[1,1‐diphenylphosphine]), dppb (1,4‐bis(diphenylphosphino)butane=1,1′‐(butane‐1,4‐diyl)bis[1,1‐diphenylphosphine]), and dpppe (1,5‐bis(diphenylphosphino)pentane=1,1′‐(pentane‐1,5‐diyl)bis[1,1‐diphenylphosphine])) resulted in the insertion of SnCl₂ into the Pt? Cl bond to afford the cis‐[PtCl(SnCl₃)(P₂)] complexes. However, the reaction of the complexes cis‐[PtCl₂(P₂)] (P₂=dppf, dppm (bis(diphenylphosphino)methane=1,1′‐methylenebis[1,1‐diphenylphosphine]), dppe (1,2‐bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane=1,1′‐(ethane‐1,2‐diyl)bis[1,1‐diphenylphosphine]), dppp, dppb, and dpppe; P=Ph₃P and (MeO)₃P) with SnX₂ (X=Br or I) resulted in the halogen exchange to yield the complexes [PtX₂(P₂)]. In contrast, treatment of cis‐[PtBr₂(dppm)] with SnBr₂ resulted in the insertion of SnBr₂ into the Pt? Br bond to form cis‐[Pt(SnBr₃)₂(dppm)], and this product was in equilibrium with the starting complex cis‐[PtBr₂(dppm)]. Moreover, the reaction of cis‐[PtCl₂(dppb)] with a mixture SnCl₂/SnI₂ in a 2 : 1 mol ratio resulted in the formation of cis‐[PtI₂(dppb)] as a consequence of the selective halogen‐exchange reaction. ³¹P‐NMR Data for all complexes are reported, and a correlation between the chemical shifts and the coupling constants was established for mono‐ and bis(trichlorostannyl)platinum complexes. The effect of the alkane chain length of the ligand and Sn^II halide is described.     

Role of dimethyl sulfoxide as a solvent for vinyl polymerization

Dimethyl sulfoxide has been used as a solvent in the polymerization of methyl methacrylate and styrene. The chain-transfer coefficients of the solvent and the values of δ [i.e., (2k_t)^1/2/k_p] in solvent-monomer mixtures of various compositions were determined. δ was observed to be dependent on the solvent concentration in the case of methyl methacrylate but remained constant in case of styrene. The lowering of the values of δ with increasing solvent concentration in case of methyl methacrylate has been attributed to an interaction between the solvent and poly(methyl methacrylate) radical resulting in lower termination rate.     

Cobalt-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions of alkyl halides with aryl Grignard reagents and their application to sequential radical cyclization/cross-coupling reactions

Reactions of alkyl halides with arylmagnesium bromides in the presence of cobalt(II)(diphosphine) complexes are discussed. Treatment of 1-bromooctane with phenylmagnesium bromide with the aid of a catalytic amount of CoCl₂(dppp) [DPPP=1,3-bis(diphenylphosphino)propane] yielded octylbenzene in good yield. The reaction mechanism would include single electron transfer from an electron-rich cobalt complex to alkyl halide to generate the corresponding alkyl radical. The mechanism was justified by CoCl₂(dppe)-catalyzed [DPPE=1,2-bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane] sequential radical cyclization/cross-coupling reactions of 6-halo-1-hexene derivatives that yielded benzyl-substituted cyclopentane skeletons.     

Ionic Platinum(II)–Imidobis(diphenylthiophosphinato) Complexes: Preparation,Structure, and Thermal Behavior

The PPh₂P(S)NHP(S)PPh₂ (dppaS₂) ligand reacts with the starting complexes PtCl₂(L-L) (L-L = Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂), (dppm), Ph₂PCH₂CH₂PPh₂ (dppe), Ph₂PCH₂CH₂CH₂PPh₂ (dppp), and NaClO₄·H₂O. Final products are monomeric complexes, and their formulas are [Pt(L-L)(dppaS₂-H)] [(L-L = dppm(1), dppe(2), dppp(3)]. All of these have been characterized by ¹H, ¹³C^,31{P¹H} NMR, FTIR, and elemental analysis. These complexes were also examined by TGA, DTA, and DSC analysis. Complexes 2 and 3 were crystallographically characterized.     

Reactions of diphosphineplatinum(II) oxalate complexes with phenylacetylene. Formation of phenylalkynylplatinum complexes

[Pt(C₂O₄)(dppe)] reacts thermally with PhCCH to produce [Pt(CCPh)₂(dppe)], which has been prepared by alternative routes. Similar treatment of [Pt(C₂O₄)(dppm)] initially produces [Pt(CCPh)₂(dppm)], which rearranges to give cis,cis-[Pt₂(CCPh)₄(μ-dppm)₂]. Reaction of [PtCl₂(dppm)] with PhCCH/KOH/18-crown-6, or with (PhCC)SnMe₃, gives [Pt(CCPh)₂(dppm)], which may be converted to the cis,cis-dimer by addition of oxalic acid. Ultraviolet irradiation or refluxing with a trace amount of dppm converts [Pt(CCPh)₂(dppm)] to trans,trans-[Pt₂(CCPh)₄(μ-dppm)₂], but the cis,cis-dimer is stable under these conditions. [Pt(C₂O₄)L₂] (L = PPh₃, PEt₃) complexes also react thermally with PhCCH to yield [Pt(CCPh)₂L₂] species.     

Basic ionic liquid/FeCl3·6H2O as an efficient catalyst for AGET ATRP of methyl methacrylate

A basic ionic liquid, 1‐butyl‐3‐methyl imidazolium hydroxide ([Bmim]OH), was synthesized and used as the additives in an iron‐mediated atom transfer radical polymerization with activators generated by electron transfer (AGET ATRP) of methyl methacrylate in bulk and solution, using FeCl₃ · 6H₂O as the catalyst, ethyl 2‐bromoisobutyrate as the initiator, vitamin C (Vc) as the reducing agent, and tetrabutylammonium bromide or tetra‐n‐butylphosphonium bromide as the ligand. Catalytic amount of [Bmim]OH could enhance the polymerization rate and produce poly(methyl methacrylate) with controllable molecular weights and narrow molecular weight distributions (M_w/M_n = 1.3–1.4). The nature of controlled/“living” free radical polymerization in the presence of basic ionic liquid was further confirmed by chain‐extension experiments. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem, 2012     

The use of ylide (4-picolinium 4-chloro phenacyl methylide) as an initiator for the polymerization of methyl methacrylate

The thermal polymerization of methyl methacrylate [MMA] was carried out using ylide (4-picolinium 4-chloro phenacyl methylide) as an initiator. The rate of polymerization (R_p) increases with increasing monomer and initiator concentrations; The exponent value has been computed to be 1 ± 0.02 and 0.5, respectively. The reaction was carried out at four different temperatures and the overall activation energy has been computed to be 16.01 kcal/mol. The polymerization was inhibited in the presence of hydroquinone as a radical scavanger. Kinetic studies indicates that the overall polymerization takes place by a radical mechanism.     

The Synthesis by Decarboxylation Reactions and Crystal Structures of 1, n–Bis(diphenylphosphino)alkane(pentafluorophenyl)‐platinum(II) Complexes

Decarboxylation reactions between the complexes cis–[PtCl₂L] (L = 1, n–bis(diphenylphosphino)–ethane (n = 2, dppe), –propane (n = 3, dppp) or –butane (n = 4, dppb)) and thallium(I) pentafluorobenzoate in pyridine give cis–[PtCl(C₆F₅)L] and cis–[Pt(C₆F₅)₂L] complexes in high yields with short reaction times. X–ray crystal structures of cis–[PtCl(C₆F₅)(dppe)] · 0.5 C₅H₅N, cis–[PtCl(C₆F₅)(dppp)], cis–[PtCl(C₆F₅)(dppb)] · C₃H₆O, cis–[Pt(C₆F₅)₂L] (L = dppe, dppp and dppb) and the reactants cis–[PtCl₂(dppp)] (as a CH₂Cl₂ solvate) and cis–[PtCl₂(dppb)] show monomeric structures with chelating diphosphine ligands in all cases rather than dimers with bridging diphosphines. ³¹P NMR data are consistent with these structures in solution.     

Synthetic and spectroscopic characterization of Rh(I)-( S )-amino acid complexes with diphosphine and triphosphine ligands

Reaction of [Rh(η⁴-cod)(S)-amino-acidato] ((S)-amino acidate?=?(S)-O₂C-CHR-NH₂; cod?=?cycloocta-1,5-diene) with 1,2-bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane (dppe) affords the ionic [Rh(dppe)₂]{(S)-O₂C-CHR-NH₂} (R?=?Me, I; Ph, II) complexes. Reactions with 1,3-bis(diphenylphosphino)propane (dppp) or 2,2,2-tris(diphenylphosphinomethyl)ethane (triphos) give the neutral [Rh(dppp){(S)-O₂C-CHR-NH₂}] (R?=?Me, III; Ph, IV) or [Rh(η²-triphos){(S)-O₂C-CHR-NH₂}] (R?=?Me, V; Ph, VI) complexes. The complexes are characterized by elemental analysis, UV–Vis-, IR-, ¹H/³¹P{¹H} NMR- and mass-spectroscopy. Two molecules of dppe coordinate to the Rh(I) symmetrically by replacing both cod and (S)-amino acidate to give I–II. Only one molecule of dppp (or triphos) coordinate to the Rh(I) asymmetrically by replacing only cod to give III–VI. Two diastereomeric Rh(I)-complexes are present in V and VI. The results further suggest that the ligands are arranged in a distorted square planar geometry around the Rh(I) centre. The use of triphos instead of dppe or dppp yields the same coordination sphere.