Structural Characterization and Enzymatic Degradation of α‐, β‐, and γ‐Crystalline Forms for Poly(β‐propiolactone)

A structural comparison of three different crystalline forms of poly(β‐propiolactone) (PPL) was carried out by wide‐angle X‐ray diffraction, Fourier‐transform infrared spectroscopy, and differential scanning calorimetry. The α‐form in a hot‐drawn and annealed film represents a 2₁ helix conformation. The β‐form in a cold‐drawn and annealed film represents a planar zigzag conformation. The γ‐form in an oriented sedimented mat of solution‐grown chain‐folded lamellar crystals also implies a planar zigzag conformation. The solution‐cast film depicts similar outlines with the γ‐form in lamellar crystals in all the experimental measurements, suggesting that the molecular chain in the solution‐cast film has a planar zigzag conformation. While elongation at break decreased, tensile strength and Young's modulus increased with an increase in the crystallinity, independent of the crystalline forms. The influence of the enzymatic degradation of these crystal structures has been investigated by using an extracellular PHB depolymerase purified from Ralstonia pickettii T1. The rate of degradation was in the order of β‐form > α‐form > solution‐cast (γ‐form) film, and the different surface morphologies after partial enzymatic degradation were observed in scanning electron micrographs. It is suggested that the crystal structure is one of the important factors for determining the rate of degradation together with crystallinity.

Enzymatic degradation profiles of poly(β‐propiolactone) films.     

M2Ga6Te10 (M: Li,Na): Two New Non‐metallic Filled β‐Manganese Phases – X‐ray and NMR Studies

Two new non‐metallic filled β‐manganese phases M₂Ga₆Te₁₀ (M: Li, Na) are obtained as black, homogeneous, microcristalline samples as well as single crystals by direct reaction of the elements. According to the single crystal structure determinations both compounds crystallize in space group R32 (No. 155, Z = 2) with the lattice constants: a = 1436.9(2), c = 1759.0(4) pm (T = 180 K, Li₂Ga₆Te₁₀) and a = 1458(1) pm, c = 1776.1(4) pm (T = 290 K, Na₂Ga₆Te₁₀). Their structures are characterized by tetrahedral close packings of Te^2–, corresponding to the arrangement of Mn atoms in β‐Mn. While Ga³⁺ ions are distributed in an ordered way over 12% of the tetrahedral holes, the M⁺ ions occupy all distorted octahedral (“metaprismatic”) holes. As the Li⁺ ions are too small they occupy off‐center positions inside the metaprisms. Positions with the strongest off‐centering can only be refined on the basis of a split model. MAS‐NMR measurements, including multiple quantum NMR, allowed the two different crystallographic M⁺ sites to be distinguished unambigously by separate ⁷Li and ²³Na signals, respectively. The assignment of the NMR signals was supported by measurements of samples in which Li⁺ was partly substituted by larger cations (Sn²⁺, Pb²⁺).     

Heterometallische Clusterkomplexe der Typen Re2(μ-PR2)(CO)8(HgY) und ReMo(μ-PR2)(η5-C5H5)(CO)6(HgY) (R = Ph,Cy; Y = Cl,W(η5-C5H5)(CO)3)

Heterometallic Cluster Complexes of the Types Re₂(μ-PR₂)(CO)₈(HgY) and ReMo(μ-PR₂)(η⁵-C₅H₅)(CO)₆(HgY) (R = Ph, Cy; Y = Cl, W(η⁵-C₅H₅)(CO)₃) Dinuclear complexes Re₂(μ-H)(μ-PR₂)(CO)₈ and ReMo(μ-H)(μ-PR₂)(η⁵-C₅H₅)(CO)₆ (R = phenyl, cyclohexyl) were deprotonated and reacted as anions with HgCl₂ to compounds of the both types Re₂(μ-PR₂)(CO)₈HgCl) and ReMo(μ-PR₂)(η⁵-C₅H₅)(CO)₆(HgCl). The heterometallic three-membered cluster complexes correspond to an isolobal exchange of a proton against a cationic HgCl⁺ group. For one of the products ReMo(μ-PCy₂)(η⁵-C₅H₅)(CO)₆(HgCl) has been shown its conversion with NaW(η⁵-C₅H₅)(CO)₃ to ReMo(μ-PCy₂)(η⁵-C₅H₅)(HgW(η⁵-C₅H₅)(CO)₃) under substitution of the chloro ligand, par example. The newly prepared compounds were characterized by means of IR, UV/VIS and ³¹P NMR data. A complete determination of the molecular structure by single crystal analyses was done in the case of Re₂(μ-PCy₂)(CO)₈(HgCl) and of ReMo(μ-PCy₂)(η⁵-C₅H₅)(CO)₆(HgCl) which both are dimer because of the presence of an asymmetric dichloro bridge, and of ReMo(μ-PCy₂)(η⁵-C₅H₅)(CO)₆(HgW(η⁵-C₅H₅)(CO)₃). The structural study illustrates through comparison the influence of various metal types on an interaction between centric and edge-bridged frontier orbitals in three-membered metal rings.     

β‐Turn Analogues in Model αβ‐Hybrid Peptides: Structural Characterization of Peptides Containing β2,2Ac6c and β3,3Ac6c Residues

The effect of gem‐dialkyl substituents on the backbone conformations of β‐amino acid residues in peptides has been investigated by using four model peptides: Boc‐Xxx‐β^2,2Ac₆c(1‐aminomethylcyclohexanecarboxylic acid)‐NHMe (Xxx=Leu ( 1 ), Phe ( 2 ); Boc=tert‐butyloxycarbonyl) and Boc‐Xxx‐β^3,3Ac₆c(1‐aminocyclohexaneacetic acid)‐NHMe (Xxx=Leu ( 3 ), Phe ( 4 )). Tetrasubstituted carbon atoms restrict the ranges of stereochemically allowed conformations about flanking single bonds. The crystal structure of Boc‐Leu‐β^2,2Ac₆c‐NHMe ( 1 ) established a C₁₁ hydrogen‐bonded turn in the αβ‐hybrid sequence. The observed torsion angles (α(?≈?60°, ψ≈?30°), β(?≈?90°, θ≈60°, ψ≈?90°)) corresponded to a C₁₁ helical turn, which was a backbone‐expanded analogue of the type III β turn in αα sequences. The crystal structure of the peptide Boc‐Phe‐β^3,3Ac₆c‐NHMe ( 4 ) established a C₁₁ hydrogen‐bonded turn with distinctly different backbone torsion angles (α(?≈?60°, ψ≈120°), β(?≈60°, θ≈60°, ψ≈?60°)), which corresponded to a backbone‐expanded analogue of the type II β turn observed in αα sequences. In peptide 4 , the two molecules in the asymmetric unit adopted backbone torsion angles of opposite signs. In one of the molecules, the Phe residue adopted an unfavorable backbone conformation, with the energetic penalty being offset by a favorable aromatic interaction between proximal molecules in the crystal. NMR spectroscopy studies provided evidence for the maintenance of folded structures in solution in these αβ‐hybrid sequences.     

Chloroselenate mit zwei- und vierwertigem Selen: 77Se-NMR-Spektren,Synthese und Kristallstrukturen von (PPh4)2SeCl6 · 2 CH2Cl2, (NMe3Ph)2SeCl6, (K-18-Krone-6)2SeCl6 · 2 CH3CN,PPh4Se2Cl9, (NEt4)2Se2Cl10, (PPh4)2Se3Cl8 · CH2Cl2 und (PPh4)2Se4Cl12 · CH2Cl2

Chloroselenates with Di- and Tetravalent Selenium: ⁷⁷Se-NMR-Spectra, Syntheses, and Crystal Structures of (PPh₄)₂SeCl₆ · 2 CH₂Cl₂, (NMe₃Ph)₂SeCl₆, (K-18-crown-6)₂SeCl₆ · 2 CH₃CN, PPh₄Se₂Cl₉, (NEt₄)₂Se₂Cl₁₀, (PPh₄)₂Se₃Cl₈ · CH₂Cl₂, and (PPh₄)₂Se₄Cl₁₂ · CH₂Cl₂ The title compounds were obtained from reactions of selenium and selenium tetrachloride with PPh₄Cl, NEt₄Cl, NMe₃PhCl, or (K-18-crown-6)Cl in dichloromethane or acetonitrile. (PPh₄)₂Se₃Cl₈ · CH₂Cl₂ was also formed from GeSe, PPh₄Cl and chlorine in acetonitrile. The ⁷⁷Se-NMR spectra of the solutions show the presence of dynamical equilibria which, depending on composition, mainly contain SeCl₂, SeCl₄, Se₂Cl₂, SeCl₆^2–, Se₂Cl₆^2–, and/or Se₂Cl₁₀^2–. Solutions of AsCl₃ and (PPh₄)₂Se₄ in acetonitrile upon chlorination with Cl₂ or PPh₄AsCl₆ yielded (PPh₄)₂Se₂Cl₆, while (PPh₄)₂As₂Se₄Cl₁₂ was the product after chlorination with SOCl₂. According to the X-ray crystal structure analyses the ions SeCl₆^2–, Se₂Cl₉^–, and Se₂Cl₁₀^2– have the known structures with octahedral coordination of the Se atoms. The structure of the Se₃Cl₈^2– ion corresponds to that of Se₃Br₈^2– consisting of three SeCl₂ molecules associated via two Cl^– ions. (PPh₄)₂Se₄Cl₁₂ · CH₂Cl₂ is isotypic with the corresponding bromoselenate and contains anions in which three SeCl₂ molecules are attached to a SeCl₆^2– ion; there is a peculiar Se–Se interaction.     

Folding Dynamics of 10‐Residue β‐Hairpin Peptide Chignolin

Short peptides that fold into β‐hairpins are ideal model systems for investigating the mechanism of protein folding because their folding process shows dynamics typical of proteins. We performed folding, unfolding, and refolding molecular dynamics simulations (total of 2.7 μs) of the 10‐residue β‐hairpin peptide chignolin, which is the smallest β‐hairpin structure known to be stable in solution. Our results revealed the folding mechanism of chignolin, which comprises three steps. First, the folding begins with hydrophobic assembly. It brings the main chain together; subsequently, a nascent turn structure is formed. The second step is the conversion of the nascent turn into a tight turn structure along with interconversion of the hydrophobic packing and interstrand hydrogen bonds. Finally, the formation of the hydrogen‐bond network and the complete hydrophobic core as well as the arrangement of side‐chain–side‐chain interactions occur at approximately the same time. This three‐step mechanism appropriately interprets the folding process as involving a combination of previous inconsistent explanations of the folding mechanism of the β‐hairpin, that the first event of the folding is formation of hydrogen bonds and the second is that of the hydrophobic core, or vice versa.     

Orthomanganated arenes in synthesis VII. Transition-metal mediated formation of a P?P bond; the X-ray crystal structure of Mn2(μ-η1, η1-Ph2PPPh2)(μ-Cl)2(CO)6

The reaction of PPh₂Cl with orthomanganated acetophenone, 2′-CH₃C(O)C₆H₄Mn(CO)₄, gives Mn₂(μ-η₁,η¹-Ph₂PPPh₂)(μ-Cl)₂(CO)₆. An X-ray structure determination [triclinic, space group P1 , a = 10.908(4) Å, b = 11.756(3) Å, c = 12.186(3) Å, α = 96.20(2)°, β = 99.51(2)°, γ = 96.52(2)°] shows two Mn(CO)₃ groups held together by two bridging Cl ligands, and further bridged by a Ph₂P? PPh₂ group prepared in situ.     

Die Chlorooxoarsenate(III) (PPh4)2[As4O2Cl10] · 2 CH3CN und (PPh4)2[As2OCl6] · 3 CH3CN

The Chlorooxoarsenates(III) (PPh₄)₂[As₄O₂Cl₁₀] · 2 CH₃CN and (PPh₄)₂[As₂OCl₆] · 3 CH₃CN (PPh₄)₂[As₂Cl₈] can be prepared from As₂O₃, SOCl₂ and PPh₄Cl in acetonitrile. Its oxidation with chlorine yields PPh₄[AsCl₆]. This was also obtained directly from arsenic, chlorine and PPh₄Cl, (PPh₄)₂[As₄O₂Cl₁₀] · 2 CH₃CN being a side product; the latter was obtained with high yield from AsCl₃, As₂O₃ and PPh₄Cl in acetonitrile. By addition of PPh₄Cl it was converted to (PPh₄)₂[As₂OCl₆] · 3 CH₃CN. According to their X-ray crystal structure analyses, both crystallize in the triclinic space group P 1. The [As₄O₂Cl₁₀]^2– ion can be regarded as a centrosymmetric association product of two Cl₂AsOAsCl₂ molecules and two Cl^– ions, each Cl^– ion being coordinated with all four As atoms. In the [As₂OCl₆]^2– ion the As atoms are linked via the O atom and two Cl atoms.     

CsMBi(3)Te(6) and CsM(2)Bi(3)Te(7) (M = Pb, Sn): new thermoelectric compounds with low-dimensional structures

The new materials CsPbBi(3)Te(6) and CsPb(2)Bi(3)Te(7) were discovered through reactions of CsBi(4)Te(6) with PbTe, whereas the isostructural materials CsSnBi(3)Te(6) and CsSn(2)Bi(3)Te(7) were discovered through corresponding reactions with SnTe. The compounds can also be prepared from stoichiometric mixtures of Cs(2)Te, Pb (Sn), Bi, and Te. The crystal structures show a layered architecture of NaCl-type slabs alternating with layers of Cs atoms. This group of compounds offers a new quaternary system, Cs-M-Bi-Te (M = Pb and Sn), available for thermoelectric investigations, including fine-tuning of compositions and doping.     

Der chemische Transport von Ni3Ge,Ni5Ge3, Ni(Ge)-Mischkristall,CoSn, Co3Sn2, Cu41Sn11 (δ-Phase), Cu10Sn3 (ζ-Phase) und Cu(Sn)-Mischkristall

Chemical Vapour Transport of Intermetallic Systems. 7. Chemical Transport of Ni₃Ge, Ni₅Ge₃, Ni(Ge)-mixed Crystal, CoSn, Co₃Sn₂, Cu₄₁Sn₁₁ (δ-phase), Cu₁₀Sn₃ (ζ-phase), and Cu(Sn)-mixed Crystals By means of GaI₃ as transport agent some intermetallics in the Ni/Ge- and Co/Sn-system can be prepared by CVT-methods. Using Iodine Cu–Sn-compounds can be deposited in a similiar way.     

Physicochemical characterization of α‐chitin, β‐chitin,and γ‐chitin separated from natural resources

We isolated α‐chitin, β‐chitin, and γ‐chitin from natural resources by a chemical method to investigate the crystalline structure of chitin. Its characteristics were identified with Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) and solid‐state cross‐polarization/magic‐angle‐spinning (CP–MAS) ¹³C NMR spectrophotometers. The average molecular weights of α‐chitin, β‐chitin, and γ‐chitin, calculated with the relative viscosity, were about 701, 612, and 524 kDa, respectively. In the FTIR spectra, α‐chitin, β‐chitin, and γ‐chitin showed a doublet, a singlet, and a semidoublet at the amide I band, respectively. The solid‐state CP–MAS ¹³C NMR spectra revealed that α‐chitin was sharply resolved around 73 and 75 ppm and that β‐chitin had a singlet around 74 ppm. For γ‐chitin, two signals appeared around 73 and 75 ppm. From the X‐ray diffraction results, α‐chitin was observed to have four crystalline reflections at 9.6, 19.6, 21.1, and 23.7 by the crystalline structure. Also, β‐chitin was observed to have two crystalline reflections at 9.1 and 20.3 by the crystalline structure. γ‐Chitin, having an antiparallel and parallel structure, was similar in its X‐ray diffraction patterns to α‐chitin. The exothermic peaks of α‐chitin, β‐chitin, and γ‐chitin appeared at 330, 230, and 310, respectively. The thermal decomposition activation energies of α‐chitin, β‐chitin, and γ‐chitin, calculated by thermogravimetric analysis, were 60.56, 58.16, and 59.26 kJ mol^?1, respectively. With the Arrhenius law, ln β was plotted against the reciprocal of the maximum decomposition temperature as a straight line; there was a large slope for large activation energies and a small slope for small activation energies. α‐Chitin with high activation energies was very temperature‐sensitive; β‐Chitin with low activation energies was relatively temperature‐insensitive. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 42: 3423–3432, 2004     

Reaktionen von Zinnchloriden mit Polysulfiden. Die Kristallstrukturen von (PPh4)2[SnCl2(S6)2], (PPh4)2[Sn4Cl4S5(S3)O] und (PPh4)2[SnCl6] · S8 · 2CH3CN

Reaction of Tin Chlorides with Polysulfides. Crystal Structures of (PPh₄)₂[SnCl₂(S₆)₂], (PPh₄)₂[Sn₄Cl₄S₅(S₃)O], and (PPh₄)₂[SnCl₆] · S₈ · 2CH₃CN . The reaction of PPh₄[SnCl₃] with Na₂S₄ in acetonitrile in the presence of small amounts of water yields (PPh₄)₂[Sn₄Cl₄S₅(S₃)O] and minor amounts of (PPh₄)₂[SnCl₂(S₆)₂], PPh₄Cl · 2S₈ and (PPh₄)₂[SnCl₆]. SnCl₄ is partially reduced by (PPh₄)₂S_x, PPh₄[SnCl₃] and (PPh₄)₂[SnCl₆] · S₈ · 2CH₃CN being produced. According to the X-ray crystal structure determination the [Sn₄Cl₄S₅(S₃)O]^2?-ion consists of an O atom that is coordinated by four Sn atoms which in turn are liked with one another by five single S atoms and one S₃ group. In the [SnCl₂(S₆)₂]^2?-ion the Sn atom is octahedrally coordinated by two Cl atoms in trans arrangement and by two chelating S₆ groups. Octahedral [SnCl₆]^2? ions and S₈ molecules in the crown conformation are present in (PPh₄)₄[SnCl₆] · S₈ · 2CH₃CN.     

Unusual Solid Solutions in the System Ge‐Sb‐Te: The Crystal Structure of 33R‐Ge4−xSb2−yTe7 (x,y ≈ 0.1) is Isostructural to that of Ge3Sb2Te6

Whereas for a series of layered compounds with the general formula (GeTe)_n(Sb₂Te₃)_m the stoichiometry allows to predict the structure type and the average thickness of the hexagonal atom layers, these rules are not generally applicable for GeTe‐rich compounds like Ge₄Sb₂Te₇. A 39R layer stacking is expected, however, single crystal diffraction studies reveal a 33R layered structure ( , a = 4.1891(5) Å, c = 62.169(15), R = 0.047) closely related to that of Ge₃Sb₂Te₆. This is also corroborated by the average layer thickness that can be determined from the strong reflections of powder patterns and exhibits a direct relation to the structure type. Mixed occupancy of cation positions with Ge and Sb and possibly defects allow this unusual range of homogeneity. Bulk material of the kinetically stable compound can be synthesized by quenching stoichiometric melts of the pure elements and subsequent annealing.     

Crystallographic report: 6‐Mercaptopurinate complex of tribenzyltin(IV), (PhCH2)3Sn(C5H3N4S)Sn(PhCH2)3OMe

The title complex displays a binuclear structure in which the geometries of tin atoms are different: one is cis‐trigonal bipyramidal (with a C₃NS donor set) and the other is trans‐trigonal bipyramidal (C₃NO). Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Cyclische Polyselenidoarsenate(III) und -antimonate(III): PPh4[Se5AsSe], PPh4[AsSe6–xSx], (PPh4)2[As2Se6] · 2 CH3CN und (PPh4)2[Se6SbSe]2

Cyclic Polyselenidoarsenates(III) and Polyselenidoantimonates(III): PPh₄[Se₅AsSe], PPh₄[AsSe_6–xS _x ], (PPh₄)₂[As₂Se₆] · 2 CH₃CN, and (PPh₄)₂[Se₆SbSe]₂ In acetonitrile, AsCl₃ and sodiumphenolate formed Cl₂AsOPh which then was reacted with PPh₄Se₅ and finally with Na₂Se to yield PPh₄[Se₅AsSe]. With Na₂S instead of Na₂Se, PPh₄[AsSe_6–xS_x] was obtained; the sulfur contents increased with increasing reaction temperature and time (x = 0.21 to 1.09). With PPh₄Se₂ instead of PPh₄Se₅, (PPh₄)₂[1,4-As₂Se₆] · 2 CH₃CN and PPh₄[Se₅AsSe] were the products. With SbCl₃ instead of AsCl₃, (PPh₄)₂[Se₆SbSe]₂ formed. PPh₄[Se₅AsSe] can also be produced from As₂Se₃, PPh₄Br, Na₂Se and selenium in acetonitrile. The crystal structure of PPh₄[SeAsSe₅] is isotypic with PPh₄[S₅AsS] (X-ray structure analysis with 2414 observed reflexions, R = 0.038). The Se₅AsSe^– ion consists of a six-membered AsSe₅ ring in chair conformation, and the As atom has an additional terminal Se atom. The compounds PPh₄[AsSe_6–xS_x] have the same crystal structures, with sulfur atoms taking all selenium positions at random, but with a preference for the terminal position. The anion in (PPh₄)₂[As₂Se₆] · 2 CH₃CN also has a six-membered ring structure in chair conformation, with two arsenic atoms in positions 1 and 4. The centrosymmetric anion in (PPh₄)₂[Se₆SbSe]₂ consists of a central Sb₂Se₂ ring, and a Se₆ ligand is bonded in a chelating manner to each Sb atom (X-ray structure analysis with 2669 observed reflexions, R = 0.099). ⁷⁷Se-NMR spectra are reported.     

Syntheses and Properties of Tetrakis(pentafluorophenyl)tellurium,Te(C6F5)4, and Related Compounds — Single Crystal Structures of Tris(pentafluorophenyl)tellurium Bromide,Te(C6F5)3Br,Tris(pentafluorophenyl)tellurium Trifluoromethanesulfonate, [Te(C6F5)3][OSO2CF3], and Bis(pentafluorophenyl)tellurium Oxide,Te(C6F5)2O

Te(C₆F₅)₄ was prepared from the reactions of TeCl₄ or Te(C₆F₅)₂Cl₂ with Grignard reagents or AgC₆F₅ in moderate to good yields. Substitution reactions with Me₃SiX (X = Cl, Br, OSO₂CF₃), with equimolar amounts of Br₂, with AgNO₃ and with H[BF₄] or BF₃·OEt₂ yielded the Te(C₆F₅)₃X derivatives (X = Cl, Br, OSO₂CF₃, NO₃, BF₄). Oxidation reactions of Cd, Hg, and Pd⁰ complexes led to Te(C₆F₅)₂ and the corresponding bis(pentafluorophenyl) derivatives M(C₆F₅)₂ (M = Cd, Hg, Pd) and with InBr to In(C₆F₅)₂Br. From very slow hydrolysis of Te(C₆F₅)₄ the oxide Te(C₆F₅)₂O was prepared. The thermal decomposition, the NMR and mass spectra of the partially new compounds are discussed. The crystal structures of Te(C₆F₅)₃Br (monoclinic, P2₁/a, Z = 4), [Te(C₆F₅)₃][OSO₂CF₃] (monoclinic, P2₁/n, Z = 16) and [Te(C₆F₅)₂O]₂ (triclinic, P1¯, Z = 2) were determined.     

Darstellung und Kristallstrukturen von Li4−2xSr2+xB10S19 (x ≈ 0,27) und Na6B10S18. Zwei neue Thioborate mit hochpolymeren Makrotetraeder-Netzwerken

Synthesis and Crystal Structures of Li_4?2xSr_2+xB₁₀S₁₉ (x ≈ 0.27) and Na₆B₁₀S₁₈. Two Novel Thioborates with Highly Polymeric Macro-tetrahedral Networks Li_4?2xSr_2+xB₁₀S₁₉ (x ≈ 0.27) and Na₆B₁₀S₁₈ were prepared from the reaction of strontium sulfide and lithium sulfide (sodium sulfide) with boron and sulfur at 700°C in graphitized silica tubes. Li_4?2xSr_2+xB₁₀S₁₉ (x ≈ 0.27) crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P2₁/c with a = 10.919(2) Å, b = 13.590(3) Å, c = 16.423(4) Å, and β = 90.48(2)°, Na₆B₁₀S₁₈ in the tetragonal space group I4₁/acd with a = 14.415(3) Å, c = 26.137(4) Å. Both structures contain supertetrahedral B₁₀S₂₀ units which are linked through tetrahedral corners to form a three-dimensional polymeric network in the case of Na₆B₁₀S₁₈ and one-dimensional chains in the case of Li_4?2xSr_2+xB₁₀S₁₉ (x ≈ 0.27). All boron atoms are in tetrahedral BS₄ coordination (B? S bond lengths vary from 1.879(5) to 1.951(5) Å (1.875(10) to 1.987(9) Å)). The strontium and lithium (sodium) cations are located within large channels formed by the anions.     

Zwei Vertreter des α-LiFeO2 Typs: LilnO2 und α-LiYbO2 [1, 2]

Two Representatives of the α-LiFeO₂ Type: LiInO₂ and α-LiYbO₂ Single crystals of LiInO₂ (well ground mixtures of ‘In₂O’: KO₂: Li₂O = 1:1.8:1, Ag-tube, 22d, 520°C); and α-LiYbO₂ (Yb₂O₃:Li₂O = 1:1.1, Ni-tube, 30d, 1150°C) were prepared for the first time from mixtures of the binary oxides. The determination of the structure confirmed the α-LiFeO₂ type. Both oxides crystallize in the space group I 4₁/amd (Z = 4); LiInO₂: a = 431.2(1) pm c = 934.2(2) pm; c/a = 2.167; 123 I_o(hkl), R = 3.6%, R_w = 2.9%. α-LiYbO₂:a = 438.7(1) pm c = 1006.7(2) pm; c/a = 2.295, 130 I_o(hkl), R = 4.4%, R_w = 3.6%. The Madelung part of lattice energy, MAPLE and characteristics of this kind of structure are discussed.