Blow-up solutions of inhomogeneous nonlinear Schrödinger equations on torus

In this paper, we study blow-up solutions to the Cauchy problem of the inhomogeneous nonlinear Schrödinger equation${\mathrm{\partial }}_{t}u=i(f(x)\mathrm{\Delta }u+\nabla f(x)·\nabla u+k(x)|u{|}^{2}u)$on ${\mathbb{T}}^2$. We present the $L^2$-concentration property for general initial data and investigate the $L^2$-minimality.     

Expression of Dirichlet boundary conditions in terms of the strain tensor in linearized elasticity

In a previous work, it was shown how the linearized strain tensor field $\mathbf{e}:=\frac{1}{2}(\mathbf{?}{\mathit{u}}^T+\mathbf{?}\mathit{u})\in {\mathbb{L}}^2(\Omega )$ can be considered as the sole unknown in the Neumann problem of linearized elasticity posed over a domain $\Omega ?{\mathbb{R}}^3$, instead of the displacement vector field $\mathit{u}\in {\mathit{H}}^1(\Omega )$ in the usual approach. The purpose of this Note is to show that the same approach applies as well to the Dirichlet–Neumann problem. To this end, we show how the boundary condition $\mathit{u}=\mathbf{0}$ on a portion ${\Gamma }_0$ of the boundary of Ω can be recast, again as boundary conditions on ${\Gamma }_0$, but this time expressed only in terms of the new unknown $\mathbf{e}\in {\mathbb{L}}^2(\Omega )$.     

On the sub poly-harmonic property for solutions to (−Δ)pu < 0 in Rn

In this note, we mainly study the relation between the sign of ${(?\mathrm{\Delta })}^{p}u$ and ${(?\mathrm{\Delta })}^{p?i}u$ in ${\mathbb{R}}^n$ with $p?2$ and $n?2$ for $1?i?p?1$. Given the differential inequality ${(?\mathrm{\Delta })}^{p}u<0$, first we provide several sufficient conditions so that ${(?\mathrm{\Delta })}^{p?1}u<0$ holds. Then we provide conditions such that ${(?\mathrm{\Delta })}^{i}u<0$ for all $i=1,2,\dots ,p?1$, which is known as the sub poly-harmonic property for u. In the last part of the note, we revisit the super poly-harmonic property for solutions to ${(?\mathrm{\Delta })}^{p}u={\mathrm{e}}^{2pu}$ and ${(?\mathrm{\Delta })}^{p}u=u^q$ with $q>0$ in ${\mathbb{R}}^n$.     

On a p-Laplace equation with multiple critical nonlinearities

Using the Mountain-Pass Theorem of Ambrosetti and Rabinowitz we prove that $?{\mathrm{\Delta }}_{p}u?\mu {|x|}^{?p}{u}^{p?1}={|x|}^{?s}{u}^{p^{?}(s)?1}+u^{p^{?}?1}$ admits a positive weak solution in ${\mathbb{R}}^n$ of class $D_1^p({\mathbb{R}}^n)\cap C^1({\mathbb{R}}^n?\{0\})$, whenever $\mu <{\mu }_1$, and ${\mu }_1={[(n?p)/p]}^p$. The technique is based on the existence of extremals of some Hardy–Sobolev type embeddings of independent interest. We also show that if $u\in D_1^p({\mathbb{R}}^n)$ is a weak solution in ${\mathbb{R}}^n$ of $?{\mathrm{\Delta }}_{p}u?\mu {|x|}^{?p}{|u|}^{p?2}u={|x|}^{?s}{|u|}^{p^{?}(s)?2}u+{|u|}^{q?2}u$, then $u\equiv 0$ when either $1<q<p^{?}$, or $q>p^{?}$ and u is also of class $L_{\mathrm{loc}}^{\infty }({\mathbb{R}}^n?\{0\})$.     

Homogenization of a Dirichlet semilinear elliptic problem with a strong singularity at u = 0 in a domain with many small holes

In the present paper we perform the homogenization of the semilinear elliptic problem

$\{\begin{array}{cc}{u}^{\epsilon }\ge 0\hfill & \text{in}{\mathrm{\Omega }}^{\epsilon },\hfill \\ ?divA(x)D{u}^{\epsilon }=F(x,u^{\epsilon })\hfill & \text{in}{\mathrm{\Omega }}^{\epsilon },\hfill \\ u^{\epsilon }=0\hfill & \text{on}?{\mathrm{\Omega }}^{\epsilon }.\hfill \end{array}$

In this problem $F(x,s)$ is a Carathéodory function such that $0\le F(x,s)\le h(x)/\mathrm{\Gamma }(s)$ a.e. $x\in \mathrm{\Omega }$ for every $s>0$, with h in some $L^r(\mathrm{\Omega })$ and Γ a $C^1([0,+\infty [)$ function such that $\mathrm{\Gamma }(0)=0$ and ${\mathrm{\Gamma }}^{\prime }(s)>0$ for every $s>0$. On the other hand the open sets ${\mathrm{\Omega }}^{\epsilon }$ are obtained by removing many small holes from a fixed open set Ω in such a way that a “strange term” $\mu u^0$ appears in the limit equation in the case where the function $F(x,s)$ depends only on x.We already treated this problem in the case of a “mild singularity”, namely in the case where the function $F(x,s)$ satisfies $0\le F(x,s)\le h(x)(\frac{1}{s}+1)$. In this case the solution $u^{\epsilon }$ to the problem belongs to $H_0^1({\mathrm{\Omega }}^{\epsilon })$ and its definition is a “natural” and rather usual one.In the general case where $F(x,s)$ exhibits a “strong singularity” at $u=0$, which is the purpose of the present paper, the solution $u^{\epsilon }$ to the problem only belongs to $H_{\text{loc}}^1({\mathrm{\Omega }}^{\epsilon })$ but in general does not belong to $H_0^1({\mathrm{\Omega }}^{\epsilon })$ anymore, even if $u^{\epsilon }$ vanishes on $?{\mathrm{\Omega }}^{\epsilon }$ in some sense. Therefore we introduced a new notion of solution (in the spirit of the solutions defined by transposition) for problems with a strong singularity. This definition allowed us to obtain existence, stability and uniqueness results.In the present paper, using this definition, we perform the homogenization of the above semilinear problem and we prove that in the homogenized problem, the “strange term” $\mu u^0$ still appears in the left-hand side while the source term $F(x,u^0)$ is not modified in the right-hand side.     

Powerful numbers in (1ℓ + qℓ)(2ℓ + qℓ)⋯(nℓ + qℓ)

Let q be a positive integer. Recently, Niu and Liu proved that, if $n\ge \max ?\{q,1198?q\}$, then the product $(1^3+q^3)(2^3+q^3)?(n^3+q^3)$ is not a powerful number. In this note, we prove (1) that, for any odd prime power ? and $n\ge \max ?\{q,11?q\}$, the product $(1^{?}+q^{?})(2^{?}+q^{?})?(n^{?}+q^{?})$ is not a powerful number, and (2) that, for any positive odd integer ?, there exists an integer $N_{q,?}$ such that, for any positive integer $n\ge N_{q,?}$, the product $(1^{?}+q^{?})(2^{?}+q^{?})?(n^{?}+q^{?})$ is not a powerful number.     

Construction of solutions via local Pohozaev identities

This paper deals with the following nonlinear elliptic equation

$?\mathrm{\Delta }u+V(|y^{\prime }|,y^{″})u=u^{\frac{N+2}{N?2}},u>0,u\in H^1({\mathbb{R}}^N),$

where $(y^{\prime },y^{″})\in {\mathbb{R}}^2\times {\mathbb{R}}^{N?2}$, $V(|y^{\prime }|,y^{″})$ is a bounded non-negative function in ${\mathbb{R}}^{+}\times {\mathbb{R}}^{N?2}$. By combining a finite reduction argument and local Pohozaev type of identities, we prove that if $N\ge 5$ and $r^{2}V(r,y^{″})$ has a stable critical point $(r_0,y_0^{″})$ with $r_0>0$ and $V(r_0,y_0^{″})>0$, then the above problem has infinitely many solutions. This paper overcomes the difficulty appearing in using the standard reduction method to locate the concentrating points of the solutions.     

Weak version of restriction estimates for spheres and paraboloids in finite fields

We study $L^p-L^r$ restriction estimates for algebraic varieties in d-dimensional vector spaces over finite fields. Unlike the Euclidean case, if the dimension d is even, then it is conjectured that the $L^{(2d+2)/(d+3)}-L^2$ Stein–Tomas restriction result can be improved to the $L^{(2d+4)/(d+4)}-L^2$ estimate for both spheres and paraboloids in finite fields. In this paper we show that the conjectured $L^p-L^2$ restriction estimate holds in the specific case when test functions under consideration are restricted to d-coordinate functions or homogeneous functions of degree zero. To deduce our result, we use the connection between the restriction phenomena for our varieties in d dimensions and those for homogeneous varieties in $(d+1)$ dimensions.     

Space-time asymptotics of the two dimensional Navier–Stokes flow in the whole plane

We consider the space-time behavior of the two dimensional Navier–Stokes flow. Introducing some qualitative structure of initial data, we succeed to derive the first order asymptotic expansion of the Navier–Stokes flow without moment condition on initial data in $L^1({\mathbb{R}}^2)\cap L_{\sigma }^2({\mathbb{R}}^2)$. Moreover, we characterize the necessary and sufficient condition for the rapid energy decay ${6u(t)6}_2=o(t^{?1})$ as $t\to \infty$ motivated by Miyakawa–Schonbek [21]. By weighted estimated in Hardy spaces, we discuss the possibility of the second order asymptotic expansion of the Navier–Stokes flow assuming the first order moment condition on initial data. Moreover, observing that the Navier–Stokes flow $u(t)$ lies in the Hardy space $H^1({\mathbb{R}}^2)$ for $t>0$, we consider the asymptotic expansions in terms of Hardy-norm. Finally we consider the rapid time decay ${6u(t)6}_2=o(t^{?\frac{3}{2}})$ as $t\to \infty$ with cyclic symmetry introduced by Brandolese [2].     

A continuum of periodic solutions to the planar four-body problem with two pairs of equal masses

In this paper, we apply the variational method with Structural Prescribed Boundary Conditions (SPBC) to prove the existence of periodic and quasi-periodic solutions for the planar four-body problem with two pairs of equal masses $m_1=m_3$ and $m_2=m_4$. A path $q(t)$ on $[0,T]$ satisfies the SPBC if the boundaries $q(0)\in \mathbf{A}$ and $q(T)\in \mathbf{B}$, where A and B are two structural configuration spaces in ${({\mathbf{R}}^2)}^4$ and they depend on a rotation angle $\theta \in (0,2\pi )$ and the mass ratio $\mu =\frac{m_2}{m_1}\in {\mathbf{R}}^{+}$.We show that there is a region $\mathrm{\Omega }?(0,2\pi )\times R^{+}$ such that there exists at least one local minimizer of the Lagrangian action functional on the path space satisfying the SPBC $\{q(t)\in H^1([0,T],{({\mathbf{R}}^2)}^4)|q(0)\in \mathbf{A},q(T)\in \mathbf{B}\}$ for any $(\theta ,\mu )\in \mathrm{\Omega }$. The corresponding minimizing path of the minimizer can be extended to a non-homographic periodic solution if θ is commensurable with π or a quasi-periodic solution if θ is not commensurable with π. In the variational method with the SPBC, we only impose constraints on the boundary and we do not impose any symmetry constraint on solutions. Instead, we prove that our solutions that are extended from the initial minimizing paths possess certain symmetries.The periodic solutions can be further classified as simple choreographic solutions, double choreographic solutions and non-choreographic solutions. Among the many stable simple choreographic orbits, the most extraordinary one is the stable star pentagon choreographic solution when $(\theta ,\mu )=(\frac{4\pi }{5},1)$. Remarkably the unequal-mass variants of the stable star pentagon are just as stable as the equal mass choreographies.