On the number of connected convex subgraphs of a connected acyclic digraph

A digraph D is connected if the underlying undirected graph of D is connected. A subgraph H of an acyclic digraph D is convex if there is no directed path between vertices of H which contains an arc not in H. We find the minimum and maximum possible number of connected convex subgraphs in a connected acyclic digraph of order n. Connected convex subgraphs of connected acyclic digraphs are of interest in the area of modern embedded processors technology.     

More proofs of menger's theorem

Four ways of proving Menger's Theorem by induction are described. Two of them involve showing that the theorem holds for a finite undirected graph G if it holds for the graphs obtained from G by deleting and contracting the same edge. The other two prove the directed version of Menger's Theorem to be true for a finite digraph D if it is true for a digraph obtained by deleting an edge from D.     

Limit points of eigenvalues of (di)graphs

The study on limit points of eigenvalues of undirected graphs was initiated by A. J. Hoffman in 1972. Now we extend the study to digraphs. We prove 1. Every real number is a limit point of eigenvalues of graphs. Every complex number is a limit point of eigenvalues of digraphs. 2. For a digraph D, the set of limit points of eigenvalues of iterated subdivision digraphs of D is the unit circle in the complex plane if and only if D has a directed cycle. 3. Every limit point of eigenvalues of a set D of digraphs (graphs) is a limit point of eigenvalues of a set of bipartite digraphs (graphs), where consists of the double covers of the members in D. 4. Every limit point of eigenvalues of a set D of digraphs is a limit point of eigenvalues of line digraphs of the digraphs in D. 5. If M is a limit point of the largest eigenvalues of graphs, then −M is a limit point of the smallest eigenvalues of graphs.     

Maximally connected digraphs

This paper introduces a new parameter I = I(G) for a loopless digraph G, which can be thought of as a generalization of the girth of a graph. Let k, λ, δ, and D denote respectively the connectivity, arc-connectivity, minimum degree, and diameter of G. Then it is proved that λ = δ if D ? 2I and κ k = δ if D ? 2I - 1. Analogous results involving upper bounds for k and λ are given for the more general class of digraphs with loops. Sufficient conditions for a digraph to be super-λ and super-k are also given. As a corollary, maximally connected and superconnected iterated line digraphs and (undirected) graphs are characterized.     

Sufficient Conditions for Super-Arc-Strongly Connected Oriented Graphs

A digraph D is called super-arc-strongly connected if the arcs of every its minimum arc-disconnected set are incident to or from some vertex in D. A digraph without any directed cycle of length 2 is called an oriented graph. Sufficient conditions for digraphs to be super-arc-strongly connected have been given by several authors. However, closely related conditions for super-arc-strongly connected oriented graphs have little attention until now. In this paper we present some minimum degree and degree sequence conditions for oriented graphs to be super-arc-strongly connected.     

Highly Arc-Transitive Digraphs With No Homomorphism Onto <Emphasis Type="Bold">Z</Emphasis>

In an infinite digraph D, an edge e' is reachable from an edge e if there exists an alternating walk in D whose initial and terminal edges are e and e'. Reachability is an equivalence relation and if D is 1-arc-transitive, then this relation is either universal or all of its equivalence classes induce isomorphic bipartite digraphs. In Combinatorica, 13 (1993), Cameron, Praeger and Wormald asked if there exist highly arc-transitive digraphs (apart from directed cycles) for which the reachability relation is not universal and which do not have a homomorphism onto the two-way infinite directed path (a Cayley digraph of Z with respect to one generator). In view of an earlier result of Praeger in Australas. J. Combin., 3 (1991), such digraphs are either locally infinite or have equal in- and out-degree. In European J. Combin., 18 (1997), Evans gave an affirmative answer by constructing a locally infinite example. For each odd integer n >= 3, a construction of a highly arc-transitive digraph without property Z satisfying the additional properties that its in- and out-degree are equal to 2 and that the reachability equivalence classes induce alternating cycles of length 2n, is given. Furthermore, using the line digraph operator, digraphs having the above properties but with alternating cycles of length 4 are obtained. Received April 12, 1999 Supported in part by "Ministrstvo za šolstvo, znanost in šport Slovenije", research program PO-0506-0101-99.     

Orientations of graphs with uncountable chromatic number

Motivated by an old conjecture of P. Erdős and V. Neumann‐Lara, our aim is to investigate digraphs with uncountable dichromatic number and orientations of undirected graphs with uncountable chromatic number. A graph has uncountable chromatic number if its vertices cannot be covered by countably many independent sets, and a digraph has uncountable dichromatic number if its vertices cannot be covered by countably many acyclic sets. We prove that, consistently, there are digraphs with uncountable dichromatic number and arbitrarily large digirth; this is in surprising contrast with the undirected case: any graph with uncountable chromatic number contains a 4‐cycle. Next, we prove that several well‐known graphs (uncountable complete graphs, certain comparability graphs, and shift graphs) admit orientations with uncountable dichromatic number in ZFC. However, we show that the statement “every graph G of size and chromatic number ω₁ has an orientation D with uncountable dichromatic number” is independent of ZFC. We end the article with several open problems.     

Digraphs with the path-merging property

In this paper we study those digraphs D for which every pair of internally disjoint (X, Y)-paths P₁, P₂ can be merged into one (X, Y)-path P* such that V(P₁) ∪ V(P₂), for every choice of vertices X, Y ? V(D). We call this property the path-merging property and we call a graph path-mergeable if it has the path-merging property. We show that each such digraph has a directed hamiltonian cycle whenever it can possibly have one, i.e., it is strong and the underlying graph has no cutvertex. We show that path-mergeable digraphs can be recognized in polynomial time and we give examples of large classes of such digraphs which are not contained in any previously studied class of digraphs. We also discuss which undirected graphs have path-mergeable digraph orientations. © 1995, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

On claw-free M-oriented critical kernel-imperfect digraphs

A kernel of a digraph D is an independent and dominating set of vertices of D. A chord of a directed cycle C = (0, 1,…,n, 0) is an arc ij of D not in C with both terminal vertices in C. A diagonal of C is a chord ij with j ≠ i − 1. Meyniel made the conjecture (now know to be false) that if D is a diagraph such that every odd directed cycle has at least two chords then D has a kernel. Here we obtain some properties of claw-free M-oriented critical kernel-imperfect digraphs. As a consequence we show that if D is an M-oriented K_1,3-free digraph such that every odd directed cycle of length at least five has two diagonals then D has a kernel. © 1996 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Randomly antitraceable digraphs

An antipath in a digraph is a semipath containing no (directed) path of length 2. A digraph D is randomly antitraceable if for each vertex v of D, any antipath beginning at v can be extended to a hamiltonian antipath beginning at v. In this paper randomly antitraceable digraphs are characterized.     

Distance connectivity in graphs and digraphs

Let G = (V, A) be a digraph with diameter D ≠ 1. For a given integer 2 ≤ t ≤ D, the t-distance connectivity κ(t) of G is the minimum cardinality of an x → y separating set over all the pairs of vertices x, y which are at distance d(x, y) ≥ t. The t-distance edge connectivity λ(t) of G is defined similarly. The t-degree of G, δ(t), is the minimum among the out-degrees and in-degrees of all vertices with (out- or -in-) eccentricity at least t. A digraph is said to be maximally distance connected if κ(t) = δ(t) for all values of t. In this paper we give a construction of a digraph having D − 1 positive arbitrary integers c₂ ≤ … ≤ c_D, D > 3, as the values of its t-distance connectivities κ(2) = c₂, …, κ(D) = c_D. Besides, a digraph that shows the independence of the parameters κ(t), λ(t), and δ(t) is constructed. Also we derive some results on the distance connectivities of digraphs, as well as sufficient conditions for a digraph to be maximally distance connected. Similar results for (undirected) graphs are presented. © 1996 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Linear arboricity of regular digraphs

A linear directed forest is a directed graph in which every component is a directed path.The linear arboricity la(D) of a digraph D is the minimum number of linear directed forests in D whose union covers all arcs of D. For every d-regular digraph D, Nakayama and P′eroche conjecture that la(D) = d + 1. In this paper, we consider the linear arboricity for complete symmetric digraphs,regular digraphs with high directed girth and random regular digraphs and we improve some wellknown results. Moreover, we propose a more precise conjecture about the linear arboricity for regular digraphs.     

Connected -tuple twin domination in de Bruijn and Kautz digraphs

For a digraph G, a k-tuple twin dominating set D of G for some fixed k≥1 is a set of vertices such that every vertex is adjacent to at least k vertices in D, and also every vertex is adjacent from at least k vertices in D. If the subgraph of G induced by D is strongly connected, then D is called a connected k-tuple twin dominating set of G. In this paper, we give constructions of minimal connected k-tuple twin dominating sets for de Bruijn digraphs and Kautz digraphs.     

On homomorphisms to acyclic local tournaments

A homomorphism of a digraph to another digraph is an edgepreserving vertex mapping. A local tournament is a digraph in which the inset as well as the outset of each vertex induces a tournament. Thus acyclic local tournaments generalize both directed paths and transitive tournaments. In both these cases there is a simple characterization of homomorphic preimages. Namely, if H is a directed path, or a transitive tournament, then G admits a homomorphism to H if and only if each oriented path which admits a homomorphism to G also admits a homomorphism to H. We prove that this result holds for all acyclic local tournaments. © 1995 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Characterization of eccentric digraphs

The eccentric digraphED(G) of a digraph G represents the binary relation, defined on the vertex set of G, of being ‘eccentric’; that is, there is an arc from u to v in ED(G) if and only if v is at maximum distance from u in G. A digraph G is said to be eccentric if there exists a digraph H such that G=ED(H). This paper is devoted to the study of the following two questions: what digraphs are eccentric and when the relation of being eccentric is symmetric.We present a characterization of eccentric digraphs, which in the undirected case says that a graph G is eccentric iff its complement graph is either self-centered of radius two or it is the union of complete graphs. As a consequence, we obtain that all trees except those with diameter 3 are eccentric digraphs. We also determine when ED(G) is symmetric in the cases when G is a graph or a digraph that is not strongly connected.     

Kings in locally semicomplete digraphs

A k‐king in a digraph D is a vertex which can reach every other vertex by a directed path of length at most k. We consider k‐kings in locally semicomplete digraphs and mainly prove that all strong locally semicomplete digraphs which are not round decomposable contain a 2‐king. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 63: 279–287, 2010     

A Characterization of Locally Semicomplete CKI-digraphs

A digraph is locally-in semicomplete if for every vertex of D its in-neighborhood induces a semicomplete digraph and it is locally semicomplete if for every vertex of D the in-neighborhood and the out-neighborhood induces a semicomplete digraph. The locally semicomplete digraphs where characterized in 1997 by Bang-Jensen et al. and in 1998 Bang-Jensen and Gutin posed the problem if finding a kernel in a locally-in semicomplete digraph is polynomial or not. A kernel of a digraph is a set of vertices, which is independent and absorbent. A digraph D such that every proper induced subdigraph of D has a kernel is said to be critical kernel imperfect digraph (CKI-digraph) if the digraph D does not have a kernel. A digraph without an induced CKI-digraph as a subdigraph does have a kernel. We characterize the locally semicomplete digraphs, which are CKI. As a consequence of this characterization we conclude that determinate whether a locally semicomplete digraph is a CKI-digraph or not, is polynomial.     

Kings in semicomplete multipartite digraphs

A digraph obtained by replacing each edge of a complete p‐partite graph by an arc or a pair of mutually opposite arcs with the same end vertices is called a semicomplete p‐partite digraph, or just a semicomplete multipartite digraph. A semicomplete multipartite digraph with no cycle of length two is a multipartite tournament. In a digraph D, an r‐king is a vertex q such that every vertex in D can be reached from q by a path of length at most r. Strengthening a theorem by K. M. Koh and B. P. Tan (Discr Math 147 (1995), 171–183) on the number of 4‐kings in multipartite tournaments, we characterize semicomplete multipartite digraphs, which have exactly k 4‐kings for every k = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Graph Theory 33: 177‐183, 2000     

Quasi-transitive digraphs

A digraph is quasi-transitive if there is a complete adjacency between the inset and the outset of each vertex. Quasi-transitive digraphs are interseting because of their relation to comparability graphs. Specifically, a graph can be oriented as a quasi-transitive digraph if and only if it is a comparability graph. Quasi-transitive digraphs are also of interest as they share many nice properties of tournaments. Indeed, we show that every strongly connected quasi-transitive digraphs D on at least four vertices has two vertices v₁ and v₂ such that D – v_i is strongly connected for i = 1, 2. A result of tournaments on the existence of a pair of arc-disjoint in- and out-branchings rooted at the same vertex can also be extended to quasi-transitive digraphs. However, some properties of tournaments, like hamiltonicity, cannot be extended directly to quasi-transitive digraphs. Therefore we characterize those quasi-transitive digraphs which have a hamiltonian cycle, respectively a hamiltonian path. We show the existence of highly connected quasi-transitive digraphs D with a factor (a collection of disjoint cycles covering the vertex set of D), which have a cycle of every length 3 ≦ k ≦ |V(D)| ? 1 through every vertex and yet they are not hamiltonian. Finally we characterize pancyclic and vertex pancyclic quasi-transitive digraphs. © 1995, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Descendant-homogeneous digraphs

The descendant setdesc(α) of a vertex α in a digraph D is the set of vertices which can be reached by a directed path from α. A subdigraph of D is finitely generated if it is the union of finitely many descendant sets, and D is descendant-homogeneous if it is vertex transitive and any isomorphism between finitely generated subdigraphs extends to an automorphism. We consider connected descendant-homogeneous digraphs with finite out-valency, specially those which are also highly arc-transitive. We show that these digraphs must be imprimitive. In particular, we study those which can be mapped homomorphically onto Z and show that their descendant sets have only one end.There are examples of descendant-homogeneous digraphs whose descendant sets are rooted trees. We show that these are highly arc-transitive and do not admit a homomorphism onto Z. The first example (Evans (1997) [6]) known to the authors of a descendant-homogeneous digraph (which led us to formulate the definition) is of this type. We construct infinitely many other descendant-homogeneous digraphs, and also uncountably many digraphs whose descendant sets are rooted trees but which are descendant-homogeneous only in a weaker sense, and give a number of other examples.