Mechanistic Insight into the Nitric Oxide Dioxygenation Reaction of Nonheme Iron(III)–Superoxo and Manganese(IV)–Peroxo Complexes

Reactions of nonheme Fe^III–superoxo and Mn^IV–peroxo complexes bearing a common tetraamido macrocyclic ligand (TAML), namely [(TAML)Fe^III(O₂)]^2? and [(TAML)Mn^IV(O₂)]^2?, with nitric oxide (NO) afford the Fe^III–NO₃ complex [(TAML)Fe^III(NO₃)]^2? and the Mn^V–oxo complex [(TAML)Mn^V(O)]^? plus NO₂^?, respectively. Mechanistic studies, including density functional theory (DFT) calculations, reveal that M^III–peroxynitrite (M=Fe and Mn) species, generated in the reactions of [(TAML)Fe^III(O₂)]^2? and [(TAML)Mn^IV(O₂)]^2? with NO, are converted into M^IV(O) and ^.NO₂ species through O?O bond homolysis of the peroxynitrite ligand. Then, a rebound of Fe^IV(O) with ^.NO₂ affords [(TAML)Fe^III(NO₃)]^2?, whereas electron transfer from Mn^IV(O) to ^.NO₂ yields [(TAML)Mn^V(O)]^? plus NO₂^?.     

Heterolytic O−O Bond Cleavage Upon Single Electron Transfer to a Nonheme Fe(III)−OOH Complex

The one-electron reduction of the nonheme iron(III)-hydroperoxo complex, [Fe^III(OOH)(L₅²)]²⁺ (L₅²=N-methyl-N,N’,N’-tris(2-pyridylmethyl)ethane-1,2-diamine), carried out at −70 °C results in the release of dioxygen and in the formation of [Fe^II(OH)(L₅²)]⁺ following a bimolecular process. This reaction can be performed either with cobaltocene as chemical reductant, or electrochemically. These experimental observations are consistent with the disproportionation of the hydroperoxo group in the putative Fe^II(OOH) intermediate generated upon reduction of the Fe^III(OOH) starting complex. One plausible mechanistic scenario is that this disproportionation reaction follows an O−O heterolytic cleavage pathway via a Fe^IV-oxo species.     

The nature of active species in catalytic systems based on non-heme iron complexes, hydrogen peroxide, and acetic acid for selective olefin epoxidation

The catalytic systems [(BPMEN)Fe^II(CH₃CN)₂](ClO₄)₂/H₂O₂/CH₃OOH and [(TPA)Fe^II(CH₃CN)₂](ClO₄)₂/H₂O₂/CH₃OOH, where BPMEN = N,N′-dimethyl-N,N′-bis(2-pyridylmethyl)-1,2-diaminoethane and TPA = tris(2-pyridylmethyl)amine, provide selective olefin epoxidation. Proton NMR studies showed that the mononuclear iron(IV) oxo complexes [(L)Fe^IV=O]²⁺, with L = BPMEN or TPA, are present in the cited catalytic systems. These intermediates are the decomposition products of the acylperoxo complexes [(L)Fe^III-O₃CCH₃]²⁺. Such a complex was observed by the ²H NMR technique at low temperatures. The [(L)Fe^IV=O]²⁺ and [(L)Fe^V=O]³⁺ oxo complexes are possible active species in the studied catalytic systems.     

Facile and Reversible Formation of Iron(III)–Oxo–Cerium(IV) Adducts from Nonheme Oxoiron(IV) Complexes and Cerium(III)

Ceric ammonium nitrate (CAN) or Ce^IV(NH₄)₂(NO₃)₆ is often used in artificial water oxidation and generally considered to be an outer‐sphere oxidant. Herein we report the spectroscopic and crystallographic characterization of [(N4Py)Fe^III‐O‐Ce^IV(OH₂)(NO₃)₄]⁺ ( 3 ), a complex obtained from the reaction of [(N4Py)Fe^II(NCMe)]²⁺ with 2 equiv CAN or [(N4Py)Fe^IV=O]²⁺ ( 2 ) with Ce^III(NO₃)₃ in MeCN. Surprisingly, the formation of 3 is reversible, the position of the equilibrium being dependent on the MeCN/water ratio of the solvent. These results suggest that the Fe^IV and Ce^IV centers have comparable reduction potentials. Moreover, the equilibrium entails a change in iron spin state, from S =1 Fe^IV in 2 to S =5/2 in 3 , which is found to be facile despite the formal spin‐forbidden nature of this process. This observation suggests that Fe^IV=O complexes may avail of reaction pathways involving multiple spin states having little or no barrier.     

Hydroxylation of Aromatics with the Help of a Non‐Haem FeOOH: A Mechanistic Study under Single‐Turnover and Catalytic Conditions

Ferric–hydroperoxo complexes have been identified as intermediates in the catalytic cycle of biological oxidants, but their role as key oxidants is still a matter of debate. Among the numerous synthetic low‐spin Fe^III(OOH) complexes characterized to date, [(L₅²)Fe(OOH)]²⁺ is the only one that has been isolated in the solid state at low temperature, which has provided a unique opportunity for inspecting its oxidizing properties under single‐turnover conditions. In this report we show that [(L₅²)Fe(OOH)]²⁺ decays in the presence of aromatic substrates, such as anisole and benzene in acetonitrile, with first‐order kinetics. In addition, the phenol products are formed from the aromatic substrates with similar first‐order rate constants. Combining the kinetic data obtained at different temperatures and under different single‐turnover experimental conditions with experiments performed under catalytic conditions by using the substrate [1,3,5‐D₃]benzene, which showed normal kinetic isotope effects (KIE>1) and a notable hydride shift (NIH shift), has allowed us to clarify the role played by Fe^III(OOH) in aromatic oxidation. Several lines of experimental evidence in support of the previously postulated mechanism for the formation of two caged Fe^IV(O) and OH ^. species from the Fe^III(OOH) complex have been obtained for the first time. After homolytic O? O cleavage, a caged pair of oxidants [Fe^IVO+HO ^. ] is generated that act in unison to hydroxylate the aromatic ring: HO ^. attacks the ring to give a hydroxycyclohexadienyl radical, which is further oxidized by Fe^IVO to give a cationic intermediate that gives rise to a NIH shift upon ketonization before the final re‐aromatization step. Spin‐trapping experiments in the presence of 5,5‐dimethyl‐1‐pyrroline N‐oxide and GC‐MS analyses of the intermediate products further support the proposed mechanism.     

Hydroxylation of Aromatics by H2O2 Catalyzed by Mononuclear Non-heme Iron Complexes: Role of Triazole Hemilability in Substrate-Induced Bifurcation of the H2O2 Activation Mechanism

Rieske dioxygenases are metalloenzymes capable of achieving cis-dihydroxylation of aromatics under mild conditions using O₂ and a source of electrons. The intermediate responsible for this reactivity is proposed to be a cis-Fe^V(O)(OH) moiety. Molecular models allow the generation of a Fe^III(OOH) species with H₂O₂, to yield a Fe^V(O)(OH) species with tetradentate ligands, or {Fe^IV(O); OH^.} pairs with pentadentate ones. We have designed a new pentadentate ligand, mtL₄², bearing a labile triazole, to generate an “in-between” situation. Two iron complexes, [(mtL₄²)FeCl](PF₆) and [(mtL₄²)Fe(OTf)₂]), were obtained and their reactivity towards aromatic substrates was studied in the presence of H₂O₂. Spectroscopic and kinetic studies reflect that triazole is bound at the Fe^II state, but decoordinates in the Fe^III(OOH). The resulting [(mtL₄²)Fe^III(OOH)(MeCN)]²⁺ then lies on a bifurcated decay pathway (end-on homolytic vs. side-on heterolytic) depending on the addition of aromatic substrate: in the absence of substrate, it is proposed to follow a side-on pathway leading to a putative (N₄)Fe^V(O)(OH), while in the presence of aromatics it switches to an end-on homolytic pathway yielding a {(N₅)Fe^IV(O); OH^.} reactive species, through recoordination of triazole. This switch significantly impacts the reaction regioselectivity.     

A Non‐Heme Iron Photocatalyst for Light‐Driven Aerobic Oxidation of Methanol

Non‐heme (L)Fe^III and (L)Fe^III‐O‐Fe^III(L) complexes (L=1,1‐di(pyridin‐2‐yl)‐N,N‐bis(pyridin‐2‐ylmethyl)ethan‐1‐amine) underwent reduction under irradiation to the Fe^II state with concomitant oxidation of methanol to methanal, without the need for a secondary photosensitizer. Spectroscopic and DFT studies support a mechanism in which irradiation results in charge‐transfer excitation of a Fe^III?μ‐O?Fe^III complex to generate [(L)Fe^IV=O]²⁺ (observed transiently during irradiation in acetonitrile), and an equivalent of (L)Fe^II. Under aerobic conditions, irradiation accelerates reoxidation from the Fe^II to the Fe^III state with O₂, thus closing the cycle of methanol oxidation to methanal.     

Axial Ligand and Spin‐State Influence on the Formation and Reactivity of Hydroperoxo–Iron(III) Porphyrin Complexes

The present study focuses on the formation and reactivity of hydroperoxo–iron(III) porphyrin complexes formed in the [Fe^III(tpfpp)X]/H₂O₂/HOO^? system (TPFPP=5,10,15,20‐tetrakis(pentafluorophenyl)‐21H,23H‐porphyrin; X=Cl^? or CF₃SO₃^?) in acetonitrile under basic conditions at ?15 °C. Depending on the selected reaction conditions and the active form of the catalyst, the formation of high‐spin [Fe^III(tpfpp)(OOH)] and low‐spin [Fe^III(tpfpp)(OH)(OOH)] could be observed with the application of a low‐temperature rapid‐scan UV/Vis spectroscopic technique. Axial ligation and the spin state of the iron(III) center control the mode of O? O bond cleavage in the corresponding hydroperoxo porphyrin species. A mechanistic changeover from homo‐ to heterolytic O? O bond cleavage is observed for high‐ [Fe^III(tpfpp)(OOH)] and low‐spin [Fe^III(tpfpp)(OH)(OOH)] complexes, respectively. In contrast to other iron(III) hydroperoxo complexes with electron‐rich porphyrin ligands, electron‐deficient [Fe^III(tpfpp)(OH)(OOH)] was stable under relatively mild conditions and could therefore be investigated directly in the oxygenation reactions of selected organic substrates. The very low reactivity of [Fe^III(tpfpp)(OH)(OOH)] towards organic substrates implied that the ferric hydroperoxo intermediate must be a very sluggish oxidant compared with the iron(IV)–oxo porphyrin π‐cation radical intermediate in the catalytic oxygenation reactions of cytochrome P450.     

A Tale of Two Complexes: Electro-Assisted Oxidation of Thioanisole by an “O2 Activator/Oxidizing Species” Tandem System of Non-Heme Iron Complexes

We report two new Fe^III complexes [L¹Fe^III(H₂O)](OTf)₂ and [L²Fe^III(OTf)] , obtained by replacing pyridines by phenolates in a known non-heme aminopyridine iron complex. While the original, starting aminopyridine [(L₅ ² )Fe^II(MeCN)](PF₆) complex is stable in air, the potentials of the new Fe^III/II couples decrease to the point that [L²Fe^II] spontaneously reduces O₂ to superoxide. We used it as an O₂ activator in an electrochemical setup, as its presence allows to generate superoxide at a much more accessible potential (>500 mV gain). Our aim was to achieve substrate oxidation via the reductive activation of O₂. While L²Fe^III(OTf) proved to be a good O₂ activator but a poor oxidation system, its association with another complex (TPEN)Fe^II(PF₆)₂ generates a complementary tandem couple for electro-assisted oxidation of substrates, working at a very accessible potential: upon reduction, L²Fe^III(OTf) activates O₂ to superoxide and transfers it to (TPEN)Fe^II(PF₆)₂ leading in fine to the oxidation of thioanisole.     

Trapping of a Highly Reactive Oxoiron(IV) Complex in the Catalytic Epoxidation of Olefins by Hydrogen Peroxide

The generation of a nonheme oxoiron(IV) intermediate, [(cyclam)Fe^IV(O)(CH₃CN)]²⁺ ( 2 ; cyclam=1,4,8,11‐tetraazacyclotetradecane), is reported in the reactions of [(cyclam)Fe^II]²⁺ with aqueous hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) or a soluble iodosylbenzene (sPhIO) as a rare example of an oxoiron(IV) species that shows a preference for epoxidation over allylic oxidation in the oxidation of cyclohexene. Complex 2 is kinetically and catalytically competent to perform the epoxidation of olefins with high stereo‐ and regioselectivity. More importantly, 2 is likely to be the reactive intermediate involved in the catalytic epoxidation of olefins by [(cyclam)Fe^II]²⁺ and H₂O₂. In spite of the predominance of the oxoiron(IV) cores in biology, the present study is a rare example of high‐yield isolation and spectroscopic characterization of a catalytically relevant oxoiron(IV) intermediate in chemical oxidation reactions.     

Beneficial Effect of Acetic Acid on the Formation of FeIII(OOH) Species and on the Catalytic Activity of Bioinspired Nonheme FeII Complexes.

Three new amine/pyridine Fe^II complexes bearing pentadentate ligand with one, two or three electron enriched 4-methoxy-3,5-dimethylpyridine were used as catalysts for the oxidation of small organic molecules by hydrogen peroxide. The distribution of products formed suggests that these ligands are not enough electron donating to promote the O−O heterolytic cleavage of the oxidant in order to generate selective Fe^V(O) species. Using acetic acid in the reaction mixtures results in a significant increase of the efficiency of these catalytic systems. Our investigations show that the use of AcOH leads to the protonation/dissociation of a pyridyl moiety and the formation of (N₄)Fe^II(OAc)(OH) species. These complexes readily react with excess hydrogen peroxide to yield (N₄)Fe^III(OAc)(OOH) intermediates. These latter intermediates are proposed to evolve into (N₄)Fe^IV(OAc)(O), which are more efficient than the usual (N₄)Fe^IV(O) and (N₅)Fe^IV(O).     

Tuning the reactivity of mononuclear nonheme manganese(iv)-oxo complexes by triflic acid

Triflic acid (HOTf)-bound nonheme Mn(iv)-oxo complexes, [(L)Mn^IV(O)]²⁺–(HOTf)₂ (L = N4Py and Bn-TPEN; N4Py = N,N-bis(2-pyridylmethyl)-N-bis(2-pyridyl)methylamine and Bn-TPEN = N-benzyl-N,N′,N′-tris(2-pyridylmethyl)ethane-1,2-diamine), were synthesized by adding HOTf to the solutions of the [(L)Mn^IV(O)]²⁺ complexes and were characterized by various spectroscopies. The one-electron reduction potentials of the Mn^IV(O) complexes exhibited a significant positive shift upon binding of HOTf. The driving force dependences of electron transfer (ET) from electron donors to the Mn^IV(O) and Mn^IV(O)–(HOTf)₂ complexes were examined and evaluated in light of the Marcus theory of ET to determine the reorganization energies of ET. The smaller reorganization energies and much more positive reduction potentials of the [(L)Mn^IV(O)]²⁺–(HOTf)₂ complexes resulted in greatly enhanced oxidation capacity towards one-electron reductants and para-X-substituted-thioanisoles. The reactivities of the Mn(iv)-oxo complexes were markedly enhanced by binding of HOTf, such as a 6.4 × 10⁵-fold increase in the oxygen atom transfer (OAT) reaction (i.e., sulfoxidation). Such a remarkable acceleration in the OAT reaction results from the enhancement of ET from para-X-substituted-thioanisoles to the Mn^IV(O) complexes as revealed by the unified ET driving force dependence of the rate constants of OAT and ET reactions of [(L)Mn^IV(O)]²⁺–(HOTf)₂. In contrast, deceleration was observed in the rate of H-atom transfer (HAT) reaction of [(L)Mn^IV(O)]²⁺–(HOTf)₂ complexes with 1,4-cyclohexadiene as compared with those of the [(L)Mn^IV(O)]²⁺ complexes. Thus, the binding of two HOTf molecules to the Mn^IV(O) moiety resulted in remarkable acceleration of the ET rate when the ET is thermodynamically feasible. When the ET reaction is highly endergonic, the rate of the HAT reaction is decelerated due to the steric effect of the counter anion of HOTf.     

Nonheme Iron Mediated Oxidation of Light Alkanes with Oxone: Characterization of Reactive Oxoiron(IV) Ligand Cation Radical Intermediates by Spectroscopic Studies and DFT Calculations

The oxidation of light alkanes that is catalyzed by heme and nonheme iron enzymes is widely proposed to involve highly reactive {Fe^V?O} species or {Fe^IV?O} ligand cation radicals. The identification of these high‐valent iron species and the development of an iron‐catalyzed oxidation of light alkanes under mild conditions are of vital importance. Herein, a combination of tridentate and bidentate ligands was used for the generation of highly reactive nonheme {Fe?O} species. A method that employs [Fe^III(Me₃tacn)(Cl‐acac)Cl]⁺ as a catalyst in the presence of oxone was developed for the oxidation of hydrocarbons, including cyclohexane, propane, and ethane (Me₃tacn=1,4,7‐trimethyl‐1,4,7‐triazacyclononane; Cl‐acac=3‐chloro‐acetylacetonate). The complex [Fe^III(Tp)₂]⁺ and oxone enabled stoichiometric oxidation of propane and ethane. ESI‐MS, EPR and UV/Vis spectroscopy, ¹⁸O labeling experiments, and DFT studies point to [Fe^IV(Me₃tacn)({Cl‐acac}^.+)(O)]²⁺ as the catalytically active species.     

Aromatic Hydroxylation at a Non‐Heme Iron Center: Observed Intermediates and Insights into the Nature of the Active Species

Mechanism of substrate oxidations with hydrogen peroxide in the presence of a highly reactive, biomimetic, iron aminopyridine complex, [Fe^II(bpmen)(CH₃CN)₂][ClO₄]₂ ( 1 ; bpmen=N,N'‐dimethyl‐N,N'‐bis(2‐pyridylmethyl)ethane‐1,2‐diamine), is elucidated. Complex 1 has been shown to be an excellent catalyst for epoxidation and functional‐group‐directed aromatic hydroxylation using H₂O₂, although its mechanism of action remains largely unknown. 1 , 2 Efficient intermolecular hydroxylation of unfunctionalized benzene and substituted benzenes with H₂O₂ in the presence of 1 is found in the present work. Detailed mechanistic studies of the formation of iron(III)–phenolate products are reported. We have identified, generated in high yield, and experimentally characterized the key Fe^III(OOH) intermediate (λ_max=560 nm, rhombic EPR signal with g=2.21, 2.14, 1.96) formed by 1 and H₂O₂. Stopped‐flow kinetic studies showed that Fe^III(OOH) does not directly hydroxylate the aromatic rings, but undergoes rate‐limiting self‐decomposition producing transient reactive oxidant. The formation of the reactive species is facilitated by acid‐assisted cleavage of the O? O bond in the iron–hydroperoxide intermediate. Acid‐assisted benzene hydroxylation with 1 and a mechanistic probe, 2‐Methyl‐1‐phenyl‐2‐propyl hydroperoxide (MPPH), correlates with O? O bond heterolysis. Independently generated Fe^IV?O species, which may originate from O? O bond homolysis in Fe^III(OOH), proved to be inactive toward aromatic substrates. The reactive oxidant derived from 1 exchanges its oxygen atom with water and electrophilically attacks the aromatic ring (giving rise to an inverse H/D kinetic isotope effect of 0.8). These results have revealed a detailed experimental mechanistic picture of the oxidation reactions catalyzed by 1 , based on direct characterization of the intermediates and products, and kinetic analysis of the individual reaction steps. Our detailed understanding of the mechanism of this reaction revealed both similarities and differences between synthetic and enzymatic aromatic hydroxylation reactions.     

CeIV- and HClO4-Promoted Assembly of an Fe2IV(μ-O)2 Diamond Core from its Monomeric FeIV=O Precursor at Room Temperature

Diiron(IV)-oxo species are proposed to effect the cleavage of strong C−H bonds by nonheme diiron enzymes such as soluble methane monooxygenase (sMMO) and fatty acid desaturases. However, synthetic mimics of such diiron(IV) oxidants are rare. Herein we report the reaction of (TPA*)Fe^II ( 1 ) (TPA*=tris(3,5-dimethyl-4-methoxypyridyl-2-methyl)amine) in CH₃CN with 4 equiv CAN and 200 equiv HClO₄ at 20 °C to form a complex with an [Fe^IV₂(μ-O)₂]⁴⁺ core. CAN and HClO₄ play essential roles in this unprecedented transformation, in which the comproportionation of Fe^III-O-Ce^IV and Fe^IV=O/Ce⁴⁺ species is proposed to be involved in the assembly of the [Fe^IV₂(μ-O)₂]⁴⁺ core.     

A High‐Valent Manganese(IV)–Oxo–Cerium(IV) Complex and Its Enhanced Oxidizing Reactivity

A mononuclear nonheme manganese(IV)–oxo complex binding the Ce⁴⁺ ion, [(dpaq)Mn^IV(O)]⁺–Ce⁴⁺ ( 1 ‐Ce⁴⁺), was synthesized by reacting [(dpaq)Mn^III(OH)]⁺ ( 2 ) with cerium ammonium nitrate (CAN). 1 ‐Ce⁴⁺ was characterized using various spectroscopic techniques, such as UV/Vis, EPR, CSI‐MS, resonance Raman, XANES, and EXAFS, showing an Mn?O bond distance of 1.69 Å with a resonance Raman band at 675 cm^?1. Electron‐transfer and oxygen atom transfer reactivities of 1 ‐Ce⁴⁺ were found to be greater than those of Mn^IV(O) intermediates binding redox‐inactive metal ions ( 1 ‐Mⁿ⁺). This study reports the first example of a redox‐active Ce⁴⁺ ion‐bound Mn^IV‐oxo complex and its spectroscopic characterization and chemical properties.     

Differences and Comparisons of the Properties and Reactivities of Iron(III)–hydroperoxo Complexes with Saturated Coordination Sphere

Heme and nonheme monoxygenases and dioxygenases catalyze important oxygen atom transfer reactions to substrates in the body. It is now well established that the cytochrome P450 enzymes react through the formation of a high‐valent iron(IV)–oxo heme cation radical. Its precursor in the catalytic cycle, the iron(III)–hydroperoxo complex, was tested for catalytic activity and found to be a sluggish oxidant of hydroxylation, epoxidation and sulfoxidation reactions. In a recent twist of events, evidence has emerged of several nonheme iron(III)–hydroperoxo complexes that appear to react with substrates via oxygen atom transfer processes. Although it was not clear from these studies whether the iron(III)–hydroperoxo reacted directly with substrates or that an initial O?O bond cleavage preceded the reaction. Clearly, the catalytic activity of heme and nonheme iron(III)–hydroperoxo complexes is substantially different, but the origins of this are still poorly understood and warrant a detailed analysis. In this work, an extensive computational analysis of aromatic hydroxylation by biomimetic nonheme and heme iron systems is presented, starting from an iron(III)–hydroperoxo complex with pentadentate ligand system (L₅²). Direct C?O bond formation by an iron(III)–hydroperoxo complex is investigated, as well as the initial heterolytic and homolytic bond cleavage of the hydroperoxo group. The calculations show that [(L₅²)Fe^III(OOH)]²⁺ should be able to initiate an aromatic hydroxylation process, although a low‐energy homolytic cleavage pathway is only slightly higher in energy. A detailed valence bond and thermochemical analysis rationalizes the differences in chemical reactivity of heme and nonheme iron(III)–hydroperoxo and show that the main reason for this particular nonheme complex to be reactive comes from the fact that they homolytically split the O?O bond, whereas a heterolytic O?O bond breaking in heme iron(III)–hydroperoxo is found.     

Synthesis,Characterization, and Reactivity of Cobalt(III)–Oxygen Complexes Bearing a Macrocyclic N‐Tetramethylated Cyclam Ligand

Mononuclear metal–dioxygen species are key intermediates that are frequently observed in the catalytic cycles of dioxygen activation by metalloenzymes and their biomimetic compounds. In this work, a side‐on cobalt(III)–peroxo complex bearing a macrocyclic N‐tetramethylated cyclam (TMC) ligand, [Co^III(15‐TMC)(O₂)]⁺, was synthesized and characterized with various spectroscopic methods. Upon protonation, this cobalt(III)–peroxo complex was cleanly converted into an end‐on cobalt(III)–hydroperoxo complex, [Co^III(15‐TMC)(OOH)]²⁺. The cobalt(III)–hydroperoxo complex was further converted to [Co^III(15‐TMC‐CH₂‐O)]²⁺ by hydroxylation of a methyl group of the 15‐TMC ligand. Kinetic studies and ¹⁸O‐labeling experiments proposed that the aliphatic hydroxylation occurred via a Co^IV–oxo (or Co^III–oxyl) species, which was formed by O? O bond homolysis of the cobalt(III)–hydroperoxo complex. In conclusion, we have shown the synthesis, structural and spectroscopic characterization, and reactivities of mononuclear cobalt complexes with peroxo, hydroperoxo, and oxo ligands.     

Mechanistic Insight into Peroxo‐Shunt Formation of Biomimetic Models for Compound II,Their Reactivity toward Organic Substrates,and the Influence of N‐Methylimidazole Axial Ligation

High‐valent iron‐oxo species have been invoked as reactive intermediates in catalytic cycles of heme and nonheme enzymes. The studies presented herein are devoted to the formation of compound II model complexes, with the application of a water soluble (TMPS)Fe^III(OH) porphyrin ([meso‐tetrakis(2,4,6‐trimethyl‐3‐sulfonatophenyl)porphinato]iron(III) hydroxide) and hydrogen peroxide as oxidant, and their reactivity toward selected organic substrates. The kinetics of the reaction of H₂O₂ with (TMPS)Fe^III(OH) was studied as a function of temperature and pressure. The negative values of the activation entropy and activation volume for the formation of (TMPS)Fe^IV?O(OH) point to the overall associative nature of the process. A pH‐dependence study on the formation of (TMPS)Fe^IV?O(OH) revealed a very high reactivity of OOH^? toward (TMPS)Fe^III(OH) in comparison to H₂O₂. The influence of N‐methylimidazole (N‐MeIm) ligation on both the formation of iron(IV)‐oxo species and their oxidising properties in the reactions with 4‐methoxybenzyl alcohol or 4‐methoxybenzaldehyde, was investigated in detail. Combined experimental and theoretical studies revealed that among the studied complexes, (TMPS)Fe^III(H₂O)(N‐MeIm) is highly reactive toward H₂O₂ to form the iron(IV)‐oxo species, (TMPS)Fe^IV?O(N‐MeIm). The latter species can also be formed in the reaction of (TMPS)Fe^III(N‐MeIm)₂ with H₂O₂ or in the direct reaction of (TMPS)Fe^IV?O(OH) with N‐MeIm. Interestingly, the kinetic studies involving substrate oxidation by (TMPS)Fe^IV?O(OH) and (TMPS)Fe^IV?O(N‐MeIm) do not display a pronounced effect of the N‐MeIm axial ligand on the reactivity of the compound II mimic in comparison to the OH^? substituted analogue. Similarly, DFT computations revealed that the presence of an axial ligand (OH^? or N‐MeIm) in the trans position to the oxo group in the iron(IV)‐oxo species does not significantly affect the activation barriers calculated for C?H dehydrogenation of the selected organic substrates.     

Facile and Reversible Formation of Iron(III)–Oxo–Cerium(IV) Adducts from Nonheme Oxoiron(IV) Complexes and Cerium(III)

Ceric ammonium nitrate (CAN) or Ce^IV(NH₄)₂(NO₃)₆ is often used in artificial water oxidation and generally considered to be an outer-sphere oxidant. Herein we report the spectroscopic and crystallographic characterization of [(N4Py)Fe^III-O-Ce^IV(OH₂)(NO₃)₄]⁺ ( 3 ), a complex obtained from the reaction of [(N4Py)Fe^II(NCMe)]²⁺ with 2 equiv CAN or [(N4Py)Fe^IV=O]²⁺ ( 2 ) with Ce^III(NO₃)₃ in MeCN. Surprisingly, the formation of 3 is reversible, the position of the equilibrium being dependent on the MeCN/water ratio of the solvent. These results suggest that the Fe^IV and Ce^IV centers have comparable reduction potentials. Moreover, the equilibrium entails a change in iron spin state, from S=1 Fe^IV in 2 to S=5/2 in 3 , which is found to be facile despite the formal spin-forbidden nature of this process. This observation suggests that Fe^IV=O complexes may avail of reaction pathways involving multiple spin states having little or no barrier.