1,1‐Organoboration of bis(trimethylstannyl)ethyne with trimethylsilyl‐ and dimethylsilyl‐dialkylboryl‐substituted alkenes: organometallic‐substituted allenes

The reactions of bis(trimethylstannyl)ethyne, Me₃Sn–C?C–SnMe₃ ( 4 ), with trimethylsilyl‐ or dimethylsilyl‐dialkylboryl‐substituted alkenes 1 – 3 afford organometallic‐substituted allenes 5 , 6 and 8 , 9 in high yield. In the case of (E)‐2‐trimethylsilyl‐3‐diethylboryl‐2‐pentene ( 1) , a butadiene derivative 7 could be detected as an intermediate prior to rearrangement into the allene. All reactions were monitored by ²⁹Si and ¹¹⁹Sn NMR, and the products were characterized by an extensive NMR data set (¹H, ¹¹B, ¹³C, ²⁹Si, ¹¹⁹Sn NMR). Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

1,1‐Organoboration of silylethynyltin compounds studied by multinuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy: isomerization at the CC bonds and electron‐deficient Si?H?B bridges

1,1‐Organoboration, using triethyl‐, triallyl‐ and triphenyl‐borane (BEt₃, BAll₃, BPh₃), of dimethysilylethynyl(trimethyl)stannane, Me₃Sn? C?C? Si(H)Me₂ ( 1 ), affords alkenes bearing three different organometallic groups at the C?C bond. For BEt₃ and BPh₃, the first products are the alkenes 4 with boryl and stannyl groups in cis‐positions. These rearrange by consecutive 1,1‐deorganoboration and 1,1‐organoboration into the isomers 5 as the final products, where boryl and silyl groups are in cis‐positions linked by an electron‐deficient Si? H? B bridge. 1,1‐Ethylboration of bis(dimethylsilylethynyl)dimethylstannane, Me₂Sn[C?C? Si(H)Me₂]₂ ( 2 ), leads to the stannacyclopentadiene 6 along with non‐cyclic di(alkenyl)tin compounds 7 and 8 . 1,1‐Ethylboration of ethynyl(trimethylstannylethynyl)methylsilane, Me(H)Si(C?C? SnMe₃)C?C? H ( 3 ), leads selectively to a new silacyclopentadiene 13 as the final product. The reactions were monitored and the products were characterized by multinuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (¹H, ¹¹B, ¹³C, ²⁹Si and ¹¹⁹Sn NMR). Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

A highly efficient synthesis of (Z)‐1‐aryl‐2‐silyl‐1‐ stannylethenes and their conversion to (E)‐2‐ arylethenyl‐, (Z)‐2‐(2‐pyridyl)ethenyl‐ and allenyl‐silanes

A Pd(dba)₂–P(OEt)₃ combination allowed the silastannation of arylacetylenes, 1‐hexyne or propargyl alcohols with tributyl(trimethylsilyl)stannane to take place at room temperature, producing (Z)‐2‐silyl‐1‐stannyl‐1‐substituted ethenes in high yields. Novel silyl(stannyl)ethenes were fully characterized by ¹H‐, ¹³C‐, ²⁹Si‐ and ¹¹⁹Sn‐NMR as well as infrared and mass analyses. Treatment of a series of (Z)‐1‐aryl‐2‐silyl‐1‐stannylethenes and (Z)‐1‐(3‐pyridyl)‐2‐silyl‐1‐stannylethene with hydrochloric acid or hydroiodic acid in the presence of tetraethylammonium chloride (TEACl) or tetrabutylammonium iodide (TBAI) led to the exclusive formation of (E)‐trimethyl(2‐arylethenyl)silanes with high stereoselectivity. A similar reaction of (Z)‐1‐(2‐anisyl)‐2‐silyl‐1‐stannylethene also produced E‐type trimethyl[2‐(2‐anisyl)ethenyl]silane, while (Z)‐trimethyl [2‐(2‐pyridyl)ethenyl]silane was produced exclusively from (Z)‐1‐(2‐pyridyl)‐2‐silyl‐1‐stannylethene. Protodestannylation of (Z)‐1‐[hydroxy(phenyl)methyl]‐2‐silyl‐1‐stannylethene with trifluoroacetic acid took place via the β‐elimination of hydroxystannane, providing trimethyl(3‐phenylpropa‐1,2‐dienyl)silane quite easily. The destannylation products were also fully characterized. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

N‐Silylaminotitanium Chlorides — Synthesis,Structures, Multinuclear Magnetic Resonance,and some Applications

N‐Silylaminotitanium trichlorides, Me₃S(R)N‐TiCl₃ ( 18 ) [R = ^tBu ( a ), SiMe₃ ( b ), 9‐borabicyclo[3.3.1]nonyl (9‐BBN)( c )], and (CH₂SiMe₂)₂N‐TiCl₃ ( 18d ) were obtained in high yield and high purity from the reaction of the respective bis(silylamino)plumbylene with an excess of titanium tetrachloride. The crystal structure of 18a was determined by X‐ray analysis. The reactions of the analogous stannylenes with an excess of TiCl₄ did not lead to 18 . N‐Lithio‐trimethylsilyl[9‐(9‐borabicyclo[3.3.1]nonyl)]amine ( 8 ) was prepared, structurally characterized and used for the synthesis of a new bis(amino)stannylene 10 and a plumbylene 11 . The compounds 18a—d served as ideal starting materials for the synthesis of bis(silylamino)titanium dichlorides, where the silylamino groups can be identical ( 19 ) or different ( 20 ). This was achieved either by the reaction of 18 again with bis(amino)plumbylenes or with lithium N‐silylamides. In contrast to the direct synthesis starting from titanium tetrachloride and two equivalents of the respective lithium amide, which in general affords 19 with identical amino groups only in low yield, the procedure starting from 18 is much more versatile and gave the pure compounds 19 or 20 in almost quantitative yield. Further treatment of the dichlorides 19 or 20 with lithium amides led to tris(amino)titanium chlorides 21 . The dichlorides 19 or 20 reacted with two equivalents of alkynyllithium reagents to give the first well characterized examples of di(alkyn‐1‐yl)bis(N‐silylamino)titanium compounds 22 — 27 . These compounds reacted with trialkylboranes (triethyl or tripropylborane) by 1, 1‐organoboration. In some cases, the extremely reactive reaction products could be identified as novel 1, 1‐bis(silylamino)titana‐2, 4‐cyclopentadienes 28 — 31 bearing a dialkylboryl group in 3‐position. In solution, the proposed structures of all products were deduced from a consistent set of data derived from multinuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (¹H, ¹¹B, ¹³C, ¹⁴N, ¹⁵N, ²⁹Si, ³⁵Cl NMR).     

Synthesis of 1‐silacyclopent‐2‐ene derivatives using 1,2‐hydroboration, 1,1‐organoboration and protodeborylation

The reaction of di(alkyn‐1‐yl)vinylsilanes R¹(H₂C═CH)Si(C≡C―R)₂ (R¹ = Me ( 1 ), Ph ( 2 ); R = Bu (a), Ph (b), Me₂HSi (c)) at 25°C with 1 equiv. of 9‐borabicyclo[3.3.1]nonane (9‐BBN) affords 1‐silacyclopent‐2‐ene derivatives ( 3a , 3b , 3c , 4a , 4b ), bearing one Si―C≡C―R function readily available for further transformations. These compounds are formed by consecutive 1,2‐hydroboration followed by intramolecular 1,1‐carboboration. Treated with a further equivalent of 9‐BBN in benzene they are converted at relatively high temperature (80–100°C) into 1‐alkenyl‐1‐silacyclopent‐2‐ene derivatives ( 5a , 5b 6a , 6b ) as a result of 1,2‐hydroboration of the Si―C≡C―R function. Protodeborylation of the 9‐BBN‐substituted 1‐silacyclopent‐2‐ene derivatives 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , using acetic acid in excess, proceeds smoothly to give the novel 1‐silacyclopent‐2‐ene ( 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 ). The solution‐state structural assignment of all new compounds, i.e. di(alkyn‐1‐yl)vinylsilanes and 1‐silacyclopent‐2‐ene derivatives, was carried out using multinuclear magnetic resonance techniques (¹H, ¹³C, ¹¹B, ²⁹Si NMR). The gas phase structures of some examples were calculated and optimized by density functional theory methods (B3LYP/6‐311+G/(d,p) level of theory), and ²⁹Si NMR parameters were calculated (chemical shifts δ²⁹Si and coupling constants ⁿJ(²⁹Si,¹³C)). Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Synthesis of 4‐silaspiro[3.4]octa‐1,5‐diene derivatives: hybrid spiro compounds

Trialkynyl(vinyl)silanes CH₂?CH? Si(C?C? R)₃ (R = Bu, Ph, p‐tolyl) were prepared and treated with 9‐borabicyclo[3.3.1]nonane (9‐BBN). Consecutive 1,2‐hydroboration and intramolecular 1,1‐carboboration reactions (each requires different reaction conditions) were studied. 1,2‐Hydroboration of the Si? vinyl group takes place at ambient temperature (23°C in tetrahydrofuran), followed by intramolecular 1,1‐vinylboration to give 1‐silacyclopent‐2‐ene derivatives, bearing still two alkynyl functions at the silicon atom. Further treatment with a second equivalent of 9‐BBN affords 1‐alkenyl‐1‐(alkynyl)‐1‐silacyclopent‐2‐ene derivatives. These undergo intramolecular 1,1‐vinylboration to give 4‐silaspiro[3.4]octa‐1,5‐dienes bearing the boryl groups at 2 and 6 positions. Protodeborylation of all new compounds (intermediates and final products) using acetic acid in slight excess afforded corresponding silanes including spirosilanes. All compounds were characterized using multinuclear NMR spectroscopy (¹H, ¹¹B, ¹³C, ²⁹Si) in solution state. Solid‐state structures for one of the trialkynyl(vinyl)silanes (R = p‐tolyl) and one of the 1‐silacyclopent‐2‐ene derivatives (R = Ph) were confirmed using X‐ray diffraction. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Solvatomorphism in (E)‐2‐(2,6‐dichloro‐4‐hydroxybenzylidene)hydrazinecarboximidamide

The structures of orthorhombic (E)‐4‐(2‐{[amino(iminio)methyl]amino}vinyl)‐3,5‐dichlorophenolate dihydrate, C₈H₈Cl₂N₄O·2H₂O, (I), triclinic (E)‐4‐(2‐{[amino(iminio)methyl]amino}vinyl)‐3,5‐dichlorophenolate methanol disolvate, C₈H₈Cl₂N₄O·2CH₄O, (II), and orthorhombic (E)‐amino[(2,6‐dichloro‐4‐hydroxystyryl)amino]methaniminium acetate, C₈H₉Cl₂N₄O⁺·C₂H₃O₂⁻, (III), all crystallize with one formula unit in the asymmetric unit, with the molecule in an E configuration and the phenol H atom transferred to the guanidine N atom. Although the molecules of the title compounds form extended chains via hydrogen bonding in all three forms, owing to the presence of different solvent molecules, those chains are connected differently in the individual forms. In (II), the molecules are all coplanar, while in (I) and (III), adjacent molecules are tilted relative to one another to varying degrees. Also, because of the variation in hydrogen‐bond‐formation ability of the solvents, the hydrogen‐bonding arrangements vary in the three forms.     

Synthesis of New Derivatives of 4‐(4,7,7‐Trimethyl‐7,8‐dihydro‐6H‐benzo[b]pyrimido[5,4‐e][1,4]thiazin‐2‐yl)morpholine

Cyclocondensation of 5‐amino‐6‐methyl‐2‐morpholinopyrimidine‐4‐thiol ( 1 ) and 2‐bromo‐5,5‐dimethylcyclohexane‐1,3‐dione ( 2 ) under mild reaction condition afforded 4,7,7‐trimethyl‐2‐morpholino‐7,8‐dihydro‐5H‐benzo[b ]pyrimido[5,4‐e ][1,4]thiazin‐9(6H )‐one ( 3 ). The ¹H and ¹³C NMR data of compound ( 3 ) are demonstrated that this compound exists primarily in the enamino ketone form. Reaction of compound ( 3 ) with phosphorous oxychloride gave 4‐(9‐chloro‐4,7,7‐trimethyl‐7,8‐dihydro‐6H‐benzo[b ]pyrimido[5,4‐e ][1,4]thiazin‐2‐yl)morpholine ( 4 ). Nucleophilic substitution of chlorine atom of compound ( 4 ) with typical secondary amines in DMF and K₂CO₃ furnished the new substituted derivatives of 4‐(4,7,7‐trimethyl‐7,8‐dihydro‐6H‐benzo[b ]pyrimido[5,4‐e ][1,4]thiazin‐2‐yl)morpholine ( 5a , 5b , 5c , 5d , 5e , 5f , 5g , 5h ). All the synthesized products were characterized and confirmed by their spectroscopic and microanalytical data.     

Photochemistry of Spiro[6H‐[1,3]Oxathiin‐2,2′‐tricyclo[3.3.1.13,7]decan]‐ 6‐one

On irradiation (300 nm) in the solid state, the title compound 8 affords tricyclo[3.3.1.1^3,7]decan‐2‐one (=adamantan‐2‐one; 9 ) selectively via [4+2] cycloreversion. A similar result is obtained on photolysis in solution (MeCN or acetone), also in the presence of added alkenes. On irradiation in MeOH, a solvent adduct 11 is isolated in addition to 9 . From experiments in CD₃OD, it can be inferred that 11 is formed via syn‐addition of MeOH to the ground‐state (E)‐heterocycle 16 .     

7‐Iodo‐8‐aza‐7‐deaza‐2′‐deoxy­adenosine and 7‐bromo‐8‐aza‐7‐deaza‐2′‐deoxyadenosine

The isomorphous structures of the title molecules, 4‐amino‐1‐(2‐deoxy‐β‐d ‐erythro‐pento­furan­osyl)‐3‐iodo‐1H‐pyrazolo‐[3,4‐d]pyrimidine, (I), C₁₀H₁₂IN₅O₃, and 4‐amino‐3‐bromo‐1‐(2‐deoxy‐β‐d ‐erythro‐pento­furan­osyl)‐1H‐pyrazolo[3,4‐d]­pyrimidine, (II), C₁₀H₁₂BrN₅O₃, have been determined. The sugar puckering of both compounds is C1′‐endo (^1′E). The N‐­glycosidic bond torsion angle χ¹ is in the high‐anti range [?73.2 (4)° for (I) and ?74.1 (4)° for (II)] and the crystal structure is stabilized by hydrogen bonds.     

Glycosylidene Carbenes,Part 29 , Insertion into B−C and Al−C Bonds: Glycosylborinates, ‐boranes,and ‐alanes

Insertion of the glycosylidene carbenes derived from the diazirines 1 , 14 , and 15 into the B−alkyl bond of the B‐alkyl‐9‐oxa‐10‐borabicyclo[3.3.2]decanes 5 , 6 , and 7 yielded the stable glycosylborinates 8 / 9 (55%, 55 : 45), 10 / 11 (31%, 65 : 35), 12 / 13 (47%, 60 : 40), 16 / 17 (55%, 55 : 45), 18 / 19 (47%, 45 : 55), and 20 / 21 (31%, 30 : 70). Crystal‐structure analysis of 17 and NOEs of 9 and 19 show that 17 , 9 , and 19 adopt similar conformations. The glycosylborinates are stable under acidic, basic and thermal conditions. The unprotected glycosylborinate 25 was obtained in 80% by hydrogenolysis of 12 . Insertion of the glycosylidene carbene derived from the diazirine 1 into a B−C bond of BEt₃, BBu₃, and BPh₃ led to unstable glycosylboranes that were oxidised to yield the hemiacetals 29 (55%), 31 (45%), and 33 (48%), respectively, besides the glucals 30 (13%), 32 (20%), and 34 (20%), respectively. Insertion of the glycosylidene carbenes derived from 14 and 15 into a B−C bond of BEt₃ led exclusively to hemiacetals; only 15 yielding traces of the glucal 40 besides the hemiacetal 39 . The glycosylidene carbene derived from 1 reacted with Al(ⁱBu)₃ and AlMe₃ to generate reactive glycosylalanes that were hydrolysed, yielding the C‐glycosides 46 (21%) and 49 (30%), respectively, besides the glucals 48 (26%) and 51 (30%); deuteriolysis instead of protonolysis led to the monodeuterio analogues of 46 and 49 , respectively, which possess an equatorial ²H‐atom at the anomeric center.     

(9E)‐9‐Benzylidene‐3‐methyl‐2‐methylsulfanyl‐5‐phenyl‐5,6,7,8,9,10‐hexahydropyrimido[4,5‐b]quinolin‐4(3H)‐one: polarized molecules within hydrogen‐bonded bilayers

The molecules of the title compound, C₂₆H₂₅N₃OS, which was prepared by means of an acid‐catalysed cyclocondensation reaction between a 6‐aminopyrimidinone and 2,6‐dibenzylidenecyclohexanone, exhibit a polarized electronic structure, namely (9E)‐9‐benzylidene‐3‐methyl‐2‐methylsulfanyl‐5‐phenyl‐3,5,6,7,8,9‐hexahydropyrimido[4,5‐b]quinolin‐10‐ium‐4‐olate, involving charge separation in the vinylogous amide portion. Four hydrogen bonds, two each of the C—H...O and C—H...π(arene) types, link the molecules into bilayers comprising inversion‐related pairs of sheets, each containing a single type of R₄³(36) ring.     

Substitution Kinetics of [Fe(PDT/PPDT)n(phen)m]2+ (n ≠ m; n,m = 1,2) with 2,2′‐Bipyridine, 1,10‐Phenanthroline,and 2,2′,6,2″‐Terpyridine

The triazines 3‐(2‐pyridyl)‐5,6‐diphenyl‐1,2,4‐triazine (PDT), 3‐(4‐phenyl‐2‐pyridyl)‐5,6‐diphenyl‐1,2,4‐triazine (PPDT), and 1,10‐phenanthroline (phen) were coordinated to the Fe²⁺ ion to form (1) , (2) , , (3) and (4) . The complexes were synthesized and characterized by mass spectroscopy and elemental analysis. The rate of substitution of these complexes by 2,2′‐bipyridine (bpy), 1,10‐phenanthroline (phen), and 2,2′,6,2″‐terpyridine (terpy) was studied in a sodium acetate–acetic acid buffers over the range 3.6–5.6 at 25, 35, and 45°C under pseudo–first‐order conditions. The reactions are first order with respect to the concentration of the complexes. The reaction rates increase with increasing [bpy/phen/terpy] and pH, whereas ionic strength has no influence on the rate of reaction. Plots of k _obs versus [bpy/phen/terpy] and 1/[H⁺] are linear with positive slopes and significant y‐intercepts. This indicates that the reactions proceed by both dissociative as well as associative pathways for which the associative pathway predominates the substitution kinetics. Observed temperature‐depended rate constants at the three temperatures at which substitution reactions were studied together with the protonation constants of the substituting ligands (phen, bpy, terpy) were used to evaluate the specific rate constants (k ₁ and k ₂) and thermodynamic parameters (E_a , ΔH ^#, ΔS ^#, and ΔG ^#). The reactivity order of the four complexes depends on the phenyl groups present on the triazine (PDT/PPDT) molecule. The π‐electrons on phenyl rings stabilizes the charge on the metal center by inductive donation of electrons toward the metal center resulting in a decrease in reactivity of the complex, and the order is 1 < 2 < 3 < 4 . The rate of substitution is also influenced by the basicity of the incoming ligand (bpy/phen/terpy), and it decreased in the order: phen > terpy > bpy. Higher rate constants, low E_a values_, and more negative entropy of activation (−ΔS ^#) values were observed for the associative path, revealing that substitution reactions at the octahedral iron(II) complexes by bpy, phen, and terpy occur predominantly by the associative mechanism. Density functional theory calculations support the interpretations.     

Two‐ and Three‐Component Reactions Leading to New Enamines Derived from 2,3‐Dicyanobut‐2‐enoates

The three‐component reactions of 1‐azabicyclo[1.1.0]butanes 1 , dicyanofumarates (E)‐ 5 , and MeOH or morpholine yielded azetidine enamines 8 and 9 with the cis‐orientation of the ester groups at the C?C bond ((E)‐configuration; Schemes 3 and 4). The structures of 8a and 9d were confirmed by X‐ray crystallography. The formation of the products is explained via the nucleophilic addition of 1 onto (E)‐ 5 , leading to a zwitterion of type 7 (Scheme 2), which is subsequently trapped by MeOH or morpholine ( 10a ), followed by elimination of HCN. Similarly, two‐component reactions between secondary amines 10a – 10c and (E)‐ 5 gave products 12 with an (E)‐enamine structure and (Z)‐oriented ester groups. On the other hand, two‐component reactions involving primary amines 10d – 10f or NH₃ led to the formation of the corresponding (Z)‐enamines, in which the (E)‐orientation of ester groups was established.     

Conformations and resulting hydrogen‐bonded networks of hydrogen {phosphono[(pyridin‐1‐ium‐3‐yl)amino]methyl}phosphonate and related 2‐chloro and 6‐chloro derivatives

In the crystal structures of the conformational isomers hydrogen {phosphono[(pyridin‐1‐ium‐3‐yl)amino]methyl}phosphonate monohydrate (pro‐E), C₆H₁₀N₂O₆P₂·H₂O, (Ia), and hydrogen {phosphono[(pyridin‐1‐ium‐3‐yl)amino]methyl}phosphonate (pro‐Z), C₆H₁₀N₂O₆P₂, (Ib), the related hydrogen {[(2‐chloropyridin‐1‐ium‐3‐yl)amino](phosphono)methyl}phosphonate (pro‐E), C₆H₉ClN₂O₆P₂, (II), and the salt bis(6‐chloropyridin‐3‐aminium) [hydrogen bis({[2‐chloropyridin‐1‐ium‐3‐yl(0.5+)]amino}methylenediphosphonate)] (pro‐Z), 2C₅H₆ClN₂⁺·C₁₂H₁₆Cl₂N₄O₁₂P₄²⁻, (III), chain–chain interactions involving phosphono (–PO₃H₂) and phosphonate (–PO₃H⁻) groups are dominant in determining the crystal packing. The crystals of (Ia) and (III) comprise similar ribbons, which are held together by N—H...O interactions, by water‐ or cation‐mediated contacts, and by π–π interactions between the aromatic rings of adjacent zwitterions in (Ia), and those of the cations and anions in (III). The crystals of (Ib) and (II) have a layered architecture: the former exhibits highly corrugated monolayers perpendicular to the [100] direction, while in the latter, flat bilayers parallel to the (001) plane are formed. In both (Ib) and (II), the interlayer contacts are realised through N—H...O hydrogen bonds and weak C—H...O interactions involving aromatic C atoms.     

1,3‐Dipolar Cycloaddition Reactions of Organic Azides with Morpholinobuta‐1,3‐dienes and with an α‐Ethynyl‐enamine

The cycloaddition of organic azides with some conjugated enamines of the 2‐amino‐1,3‐diene, 1‐amino‐1,3‐diene, and 2‐aminobut‐1‐en‐3‐yne type is investigated. The 2‐morpholinobuta‐1,3‐diene 1 undergoes regioselective [3+2] cycloaddition with several electrophilic azides RN₃ 2 ( a , R=4‐nitrophenyl; b , R=ethoxycarbonyl; c , R=tosyl; d , R=phenyl) to form 5‐alkenyl‐4,5‐dihydro‐5‐morpholino‐1H‐1,2,3‐triazoles 3 which are transformed into 1,5‐disubstituted 1H‐triazoles 4a , d or α,β‐unsaturated carboximidamide 5 (Scheme 1). The cycloaddition reaction of 4‐[(1E,3Z)‐3‐morpholino‐4‐phenylbuta‐1,3‐dienyl]morpholine ( 7 ) with azide 2a occurs at the less‐substituted enamine function and yields the 4‐(1‐morpholino‐2‐phenylethenyl)‐1H‐1,2,3‐triazole 8 (Scheme 2). The 1,3‐dipolar cycloaddition reaction of azides 2a – d with 4‐(1‐methylene‐3‐phenylprop‐2‐ynyl)morpholine ( 9 ) is accelerated at high pressure (ca. 7–10 kbar) and gives 1,5‐disubstituted dihydro‐1H‐triazoles 10a , b and 1‐phenyl‐5‐(phenylethynyl)‐1H‐1,2,3‐triazole ( 11d ) in significantly improved yields (Schemes 3 and 4). The formation of 11d is also facilitated in the presence of an equimolar quantity of tBuOH. The three‐component reaction between enamine 9 , phenyl azide, and phenol affords the 5‐(2‐phenoxy‐2‐phenylethenyl)‐1H‐1,2,3‐triazole 14d .     

Synthesis,crystal structures and anti‐inflammatory activity of fluorine‐substituted 1,4,5,6‐tetrahydrobenzo[h]quinazolin‐2‐amine derivatives

Two fluorine‐substituted 1,4,5,6‐tetrahydrobenzo[h]quinazolin‐2‐amine (BQA) derivatives, namely 2‐amino‐4‐(2‐fluorophenyl)‐9‐methoxy‐1,4,5,6‐tetrahydrobenzo[h]quinazolin‐3‐ium chloride, ( 8 ), and 2‐amino‐4‐(4‐fluorophenyl)‐9‐methoxy‐1,4,5,6‐tetrahydrobenzo[h]quinazolin‐3‐ium chloride, ( 9 ), both C₁₉H₁₉FN₃O⁺·Cl^?, were generated by Michael addition reactions between guanidine hydrochloride and the α,β‐unsaturated ketones (E)‐2‐(2‐fluorobenzylidene)‐7‐methoxy‐3,4‐dihydronaphthalen‐1(2H)‐one, C₁₈H₁₅FO₂, ( 6 ), and (E)‐2‐(4‐fluorobenzylidene)‐7‐methoxy‐3,4‐dihydronaphthalen‐1(2H)‐one, ( 7 ). Because both sides of α,β‐unsaturated ketones ( 6 ) or ( 7 ) can be attacked by guanidine, we obtained a pair of isomers in ( 8 ) and ( 9 ). Single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction indicates that each isomer has a chiral C atom and both ( 8 ) and ( 9 ) crystallize in the achiral space group P2₁/c. The chloride ion, as a hydrogen‐bond acceptor, plays an important role in the formation of multiple hydrogen bonds. Thus, adjacent molecules are connected through intermolecular hydrogen bonds to generate a banded structure. Furthermore, these bands are linked into an interesting 3D network via hydrogen bonds and π–π interactions. Fortunately, the solubilities of ( 8 ) and ( 9 ) were distinctly improved and can exceed 50 mg ml^?1 in water or PBS buffer system (pH 7.4) at room temperature. In addition, the results of an investigation of anti‐inflammatory activity show that ( 8 ) and ( 9 ), with o‐ and p‐fluoro substituents, respectively, display more potential for inhibitory effects on LPS‐induced NO secretion than starting ketones ( 6 ) and ( 7 ).     

`Inverse‐Electron‐Demand' Diels‐Alder Reactions of (E)‐3‐Diazenylbut‐2‐enes in Water

The cycloadditions of (E)‐3‐diazenylbut‐2‐enes 1 with a variety of alkenes 2 – 6 were carried out in water as well as in organic solvents. The reactions were always faster in heterogeneous aqueous medium than in the organic solvents. These conjugated diazenyl‐alkenes behave mainly as heterodienes, and the Diels‐Alder adducts are the sole or at least main reaction products. Pyrroles derived from zwitterionic [3+2] cycloaddition reactions were observed in some cases. The cycloaddition of 1a with (+)‐2‐(ethenyloxy)‐3,7,7‐trimethylbicyclo[4.1.0]heptane ( 5 ) is the first example of an asymmetric `inverse electron‐demand' Diels‐Alder reaction carried out in pure water.     

Synthesis,crystal structure studies and solvatochromic behaviour of two 2‐{5‐[4‐(dimethylamino)phenyl]penta‐2,4‐dien‐1‐ylidene}malononitrile derivatives

The synthesis, crystal structure studies and solvatochromic behavior of 2‐{(2E,4E)‐5‐[4‐(dimethylamino)phenyl]penta‐2,4‐dien‐1‐ylidene}malononitrile, C₁₆H₁₅N₃ (DCV[3]), and 2‐{(2E,4E,6E)‐7‐[4‐(dimethylamino)phenyl]hepta‐2,4,6‐trien‐1‐ylidene}malononitrile, C₁₈H₁₇N₃ (DCV[4]), are reported and discussed in comparison with their homologs having a shorter length of the π‐conjugated bridge. The compounds of this series have potential use as nonlinear materials with second‐order effects due to their donor–acceptor structures. However, DCV[3] and DCV[4] crystallized in the centrosymmetric space group P2₁/c which excludes their application as nonlinear optical materials in the crystalline state. They both crystallize with two independent molecules having the same molecular conformation in the asymmetric unit. The series DCV[1]–DCV[4] demonstrated reversed solvatochromic behavior in toluene, chloroform, and acetonitrile.     

Kinetics of the ene reactions of 4‐phenyl‐1,2,4‐triazoline‐3,5‐dione with β‐pinene and 2‐carene: Temperature,high pressure,and solvent effects

The data on temperature, solvent, and high hydrostatic pressure influence on the rate of the ene reactions of 4‐phenyl‐1,2,4‐triazoline‐3,5‐dione ( 1 ) with 2‐carene ( 2 ), and β‐pinene ( 4 ) have been obtained. Ene reactions 1 + 2 and 1 + 4 have high heat effects: ∆H_r‐n ( 1 + 2 ) −158.4, ∆H_r‐n( 1 + 4 ) −159.2 kJ mol⁻¹, 25°C, 1,2‐dichloroethane. The comparison of the activation volume (∆V^≠( 1 + 2 ) −29.9 cm³ mol⁻¹, toluene; ∆V^≠( 1 + 4 ) −36.0 cm³ mol⁻¹, ethyl acetate) and reaction volume values (∆V_r‐n( 1 + 2 ) −24.0 cm³ mol⁻¹, toluene; ∆V_r‐n( 1 + 4 ) −30.4 cm³ mol⁻¹, ethyl acetate) reveals more compact cyclic transition states in comparison with the acyclic reaction products 3 and 5 . In the series of nine solvents, the reaction rate of 1+2 increases 260‐fold and 1+4 increases 200‐fold, respectively, but not due to the solvent polarity.