Synthesis and molecular structures of heterometallic complexes [RC5H4Fe(CO)2]2 Sn(TePh)2 and their adducts with chromium and tungsten carbonyls or with trimethylplatinum iodide

Complexes [RC₅H₄Fe(CO)₂]₂Sn(TePh)₂ (R=H, Me) containing stable heterometallic Fe−Sn−Fe fragments with two phenyltellurium groups at the tin atom were synthesized from [RC₅H₄Fe(CO)₂]₂SnCl₂ (R=H, Me) and sodium phenyltelluride and their structures were established by X-ray analysis. Their chelates with tungsten tetracarbonyl, [RC₅H₄Fe(CO)₂]₂Sn(TePh)₂[W(CO)₄] (R=Me, H), and complexes with two Cr(CO)₅ fragments or dimeric trimethylplatinum iodide were synthesized and studied by X-ray analysis. Thermal decomposition of [RC₅H₄Fe(CO)₂]₂Sn(TePh)₂ complexes and their adducts with ML fragments (ML=W(CO)₄, 2 Cr(CO)₅, (Me₃PtI)₂) into inorganic tellurides of a preset mixed-metal—chalcogenide composition was studied by differential scanning calorimetry. The temperature of complete elimination of organic fragments from methylcyclopentadienyl complexes is about 100°C lower than in the case of cyclopentadienyl analogs. Translated fromIzvestiya Akademii Nauk. Seriya Khimicheskaya, No. 9, pp. 1766–1772, September, 1999.     

Synthesis and Crystal Structure of a Heteronuclear Fe–Ru Silyl Complex*

The reaction of the iron metalate [Fe{Si(OMe)₃}(CO)₃(dppm-P)]⁻ (1b) with [Ru(CO)₃Cl(μ-Cl)]₂ afforded the heterodinuclear complex [(OC)₃{(MeO)₃Si}Fe(μ-dppm)Ru(CO)₃Cl)] (Fe–Ru) (3) in which a long Fe–Ru separation of 2.956(1) ? has been crystallographically evidenced. It was shown by density functional theory (DFT) calculations to correspond to the minimum-energy structure. Upon treatment of the corresponding hydrido complex [HFe{Si(OMe)₃}(CO)₃(dppm-P)] (1a) with [Ru(CO)₃Cl(μ-Cl)]₂, the chloride-bridged tetranuclear hydrido complex [(OC)₃{(MeO)₃Si}Fe(H)(μ-dppm)Ru(CO)₂Cl(μ-Cl)]₂ (4) was formed in which the Fe and Ru centers are only linked via bridging dppm ligands. Electronic supplementary material  The online version of this article (doi:) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Chemical Bonding in Homoleptic Carbonyl Cations [M{Fe(CO)5}2]+ (M=Cu,Ag, Au)

Syntheses of the copper and gold complexes [Cu{Fe(CO)₅}₂][SbF₆] and [Au{Fe(CO)₅}₂][HOB{3,5-(CF₃)₂C₆H₃}₃] containing the homoleptic carbonyl cations [M{Fe(CO)₅}₂]⁺ (M=Cu, Au) are reported. Structural data of the rare, trimetallic Cu₂Fe, Ag₂Fe and Au₂Fe complexes [Cu{Fe(CO)₅}₂][SbF₆], [Ag{Fe(CO)₅}₂][SbF₆] and [Au{Fe(CO)₅}₂][HOB{3,5-(CF₃)₂C₆H₃}₃] are also given. The silver and gold cations [M{Fe(CO)₅}₂]⁺ (M=Ag, Au) possess a nearly linear Fe-M-Fe’ moiety but the Fe-Cu-Fe’ in [Cu{Fe(CO)₅}₂][SbF₆] exhibits a significant bending angle of 147° due to the strong interaction with the [SbF₆]⁻ anion. The Fe(CO)₅ ligands adopt a distorted square-pyramidal geometry in the cations [M{Fe(CO)₅}₂]⁺, with the basal CO groups inclined towards M. The geometry optimization with DFT methods of the cations [M{Fe(CO)₅}₂]⁺ (M=Cu, Ag, Au) gives equilibrium structures with linear Fe-M-Fe’ fragments and D₂ symmetry for the copper and silver cations and D_4d symmetry for the gold cation. There is nearly free rotation of the Fe(CO)₅ ligands around the Fe-M-Fe’ axis. The calculated bond dissociation energies for the loss of both Fe(CO)₅ ligands from the cations [M{Fe(CO)₅}₂]⁺ show the order M=Au (D_e=137.2 kcal mol⁻¹)>Cu (D_e=109.0 kcal mol⁻¹)>Ag (D_e=92.4 kcal mol⁻¹). The QTAIM analysis shows bond paths and bond critical points for the M−Fe linkage but not between M and the CO ligands. The EDA-NOCV calculations suggest that the [Fe(CO)₅]→M⁺←[Fe(CO)₅] donation is significantly stronger than the [Fe(CO)₅]←M⁺→[Fe(CO)₅] backdonation. Inspection of the pairwise orbital interactions identifies four contributions for the charge donation of the Fe(CO)₅ ligands into the vacant (n)s and (n)p AOs of M⁺ and five components for the backdonation from the occupied (n-1)d AOs of M⁺ into vacant ligand orbitals.     

The Shortened Transition Metal–Tellurium Bonds in Organometallic Clusters

The shortening of partly multiple M–Te (M = Mn, Fe, Co, Cr or W) bonds is observed for two classes of organometallic compounds: (1) formally electron-deficient species with additional donor–acceptor interaction between Te lone pairs and half-occupied d-orbitals of M; (2) formally electron-saturated species having additional dative interaction between M lone pairs and LUMO of Te. These compounds could be prepared by two main methods: (a) interaction of [CpMn(CO)₂PhC(O)⁻]Li⁺ with Te proceeds via formation of intermediate {[CpMn(CO)₂]₂Te}²⁻ which is further transformed into binuclear complex [CpMn(CO)₂]₂Te(CH₂Ph)₂ or into trinuclear ditelluride cluster [CpMn(CO)₂]₃Te₂ on one hand or to mixed-metal monotelluride clusters [CpMn(CO)₂]₂TeM(CO)₅ on another hand. (b) treatment of Fe(CO)₅, CpMn(CO)₂(THF) or Me₄C₄Co(CO)₂I with [PhTeI]₄, PhTeI₃ or PhTeI₂HC = CPhI results in different PhTeI-containing complexes of Fe, Mn or Co. The molecular structures of all new compounds were studied by means of X-ray diffraction analyses and the mechanism of M–Te bond shortening is discussed. Proceeding of the international workshop on transition metal clusters, 3–5 July 2008, Université de Rennes 1, Campus de Beaulieu, Rennes, France.     

Ge−Fe Carbonyl Cluster Compounds: Ionic Liquids-Based Synthesis,Structures, and Properties

Nine Ge−Fe carbonyl cluster compounds are prepared via ionic liquids-based synthesis. This includes the novel compounds [EMIm][Fe(CO)₃I(GeI₃)], [EHIm][Fe(CO)₃I(GeI₃)], [BMIm][GeI₂{Fe(CO)₄}₂(μ-I)][AlCl₄]₂, [GeI₂{Fe(CO)₄}₂(μ-I)][Fe(AlBr₄)₃], [BMIm]₂[(FeI₂)_0.75{Fe(CO)₂I(GeI₃)₂}₂], and [EHIm][Fe(CO)₄(GeI₂)₂Fe(CO)₃GeI₃] as well as the previously reported compounds (Fe(CO)₄(GeI₃)₂, FeI₄{GeI₃Fe(CO)₃}₂, and Ge₁₂{Fe(CO)₃}₈(μ-I)₄ (EMIm: 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium, EHIm: 1-ethylimidazolium, BMIm: 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium). With this series of compounds, a comparison of synthesis conditions and structural features is possible and, for instance, allows correlating the composition and structure of the respective Ge−Fe carbonyl cluster compounds with the type and acidity of the ionic liquid. With [EMIm][{GeI₃}₂Fe(CO)₃I], moreover, we can exemplarily show the thermal decomposition as a single-source precursor in the ionic liquid, resulting in bimetallic Ge−Fe nanoparticles with small size and narrow size distribution (7.0±1.4 nm).     

Oxidative Addition vs. Ligand-Exchange: Fe(II)-Mixed-Phenylchalcogenolate Complexes fac-[PPN][Fe(CO)3(TePh)n(SePh)3-N] (n = 1, 2)

Diphenyldichalcogenides (PhE)₂ (E = Te, Se) react with Fe(0)-phenylchalcogenolate [PPN] [PhEFe(CO)₄] to yield the products of oxidative addition, Fe(II)-mixed-phenylchalcogenolate fac- [PPN][Fe(CO)₃(TePh)_n(ScPh)_3-n] (n = 1, 2). Reactions of [PPN][REFe(CO)₄] (E=Se, R=Me; E=S, R=Et) and diphenyldichalcogenides yielded ligand-exchange products [PPN][PhEFe(CO)₄] (E=Te, Se, S). The compounds [Fe(CO)₃(TePh)(ScPh)₂]^? (l) and [Fe(CO)₃(TePh)₂ (2) crystallize in the isomorphous monoclinic space group C_2/e, with a = 32.035(8), b = 11.708(6), c = 28.909(6) Å, Z = 8, R = 0.048, and R_w = 0.044 (1); with a = 32.089(5), b= 11.745(2), c = 28.990(8) Å, Z = 8, R = 0.048, and R_w = 0.048 (2). The complexes 1 and 2 crystallize as discrete cations of PPN⁺ and anions of [Fe(CO)₃(TcPh)_u(ScPh)_3-n] (n=1, 2), and one half solvent molecule THF. The geometry around Fe(II) is a distorted octahedron with three carbonyl groups and three phenylchalcogenolate ligands occupying facial positions.     

Preparation and Mössbauer study of iron-mercury halide complexes containing isocyanide and carbonyl ligands

Summary Complexes [Fe(t-BuNC)_n(CO)_5-n](n = 1 or 2) react with equimolar amounts of mercury(II) halides in acetone to form neutral iron-mercury adducts [Fe(t-BuNC) (CO)_4–(HgX₂)] and [Fe(t-BuNC)₂(CO)₃(HgX₂)] (X = Cl or I), while [Fe(t-BuNC)₅] reacts with solid mercury halides in petroleum ether to give the salts [Fe(t-BuNC)₅(HgX)]-HgX₃ (X = Br or I). Product assessment was based upon analytical and spectroscopic data, the Mössbauer effect and on molar conductivity studies.     

Topospecific Reactions of a [5.5.5.5]Fenestradiene with [Fe2(CO)9]

N, N-Dimethylformamide dimethyl acetal transforms an allylic OH group, which is part of a tetracyclic hydrocarbon in a unique elimination reaction into a [5.5.5.5]fenestradiene ( 2b → 4 ). In topologically selective reactions of this diene 4 with [Fe₂(CO)₉,], the [Fe(CO)₄(η²-diene)] and the [Fe(CO)3(η⁴-diene)] complexes 8 and 9 , respectively, are formed by complexation on one side of the diene moiety, whereas complexation on the other side leads to a [Fe(CO)₂(Cp)] complex 10 .     

NMR parameters of the tetrahedrane [Fe2(CO)6(μ-SNH)], studied by experiment and DFT

The intramolecular dynamic behavior of the tetrahedrane-type cluster [Fe₂(CO)₆(μ-SNH)] 1 was studied by ¹³C NMR spectroscopy. The ⁵⁷Fe chemical shift of 1 and the coupling constants ¹ J(⁵⁷Fe,¹³C) were measured. These NMR parameters, and also ¹ J(⁵⁷Fe,¹⁵N), were found to be in good agreement with data calculated by using density functional theory (DFT) methods (B3LYP), based on the geometry calculated at the 6-311+G(d,p) level of theory. The isolobal replacement of the Fe(CO)₃ with BH fragments leads to the tetrahedranes [Fe(CO)₃(BH)(μ-SNH)] 2 and [(HB)₂(μ-SNH)] 3. Both were identified by calculations as minima on the respective potential energy surface (PES). However, the tetrahedrane-type structure of 3 is much higher in energy when compared with the planar cyclic isomers 3a and 3b.     

Chelating and Tellurolate Ligand‐Transfer Studies of the Complex fac‐[Fe(CO)3(TePh)3]−: Crystal Structures of Heterodinuclear (CO)3Mn(μ‐TePh)3Fe(CO)3 and CpNi(TePh)(PPh3)

Complex fac‐[Fe(CO)₃(TePh)₃]^? was employed as a “metallo chelating” ligand to synthesize the neutral (CO)₃Mn(μ‐TePh)₃Fe(CO)₃ obtained in a one‐step synthesis by treating fac‐[Fe(CO)₃(TePh)₃]^? with fac‐[Mn‐(CO)₃(CH₃CN)₃]⁺. It seems reasonable to conclude that the d⁶ Fe(II) [(CO)₃Fe(TePh)₃]^? fragment is isolobal with the d⁶ Mn(I) [(CO)₃Mn(TePh)₃]^2? fragment in complex (CO)₃Mn(μ‐TePh)₃Fe(CO)₃. Addition of fac‐[Fe(CO)₃(TePh)₃]^? to the CpNi(I)(PPh₃) in THF resulted in formation of the neutral CpNi(TePh)(PPh₃) also obtained from reaction of CpNi(I)(PPh₃) and [Na][TePh] in MeOH. This investigation shows that fac‐[Fe(CO)₃(TePh)₃]^? serves as a tridentate metallo ligand and tellurolate ligand‐transfer reagent. The study also indicated that the fac‐[Fe(CO)₃(SePh)₃]^? may serve as a better tridentate metallo ligand and chalcogenolate ligand‐transfer reagent than fac‐[Fe(CO)₃(TePh)₃]^? in the syntheses of heterometallic chalcogenolate complexes.     

Cyclopentadienyl Dicarbonyl Iron‐Bismuth Compounds – Synthesis,Structure, and Reactivity

Abstract. The cyclopentadienyl‐substituted iron‐bismuth complexes [{Cp(CO)₂Fe}BiCl₂] ( 1 ), [{Cp(CO)₂Fe}BiBr₂] ( 2 ), [{Cp′′(CO)₂Fe}BiBr₂] ( 3 ) and [{Cp*(CO)₂Fe}BiBr₂] ( 4 ) were prepared with high yields starting from [Cp^x(CO)₂Fe]₂ [Cp^x = C₅H₅ (Cp), C₅H₃‐1, 3‐tBu₂ (Cp′′), C₅Me₅ (Cp*)] and the corresponding bismuth halides. The single crystal X‐ray structure analyses of compounds 2 – 4 are reported. Comparison of their solubility demonstrates that the steric hindrance in this type of compounds is only slightly higher for compound 3 compared with compound 2 but significantly lower compared with the Cp* derivative 4 . Compounds 1 – 4 react with nucleophililic reagents such as KOtBu, NaOCH₂CH₂OCH₃, and NaOSiMe₃ as well as with water in the presence of an amine to give a mixture of [{Cp^x(CO)₂Fe}BiX] (X = Cl, Br) and [{Cp^x(CO)₂Fe}₃Bi]. In case of a reaction with nBu₄NCl and DMAP (dimethylaminopyridine) no such dismutation is observed. Instead the complexes [{Cp(CO)₂Fe}BiBr₂(DMAP)₂] ( 5 ), [NnBu₄]₂[{{Cp(CO)₂Fe}BiBr₃}₂] ( 6 ) and [NnBu₄]₂[{{Cp(CO)₂Fe}BiCl₃}₂] ( 7 ) were isolated and characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction.     

Replacement of Fe atoms by Ru in a carbidocarbonyl cluster [Fe<Subscript>6</Subscript>C(CO)<Subscript>16</Subscript>]<Superscript>2−</Superscript>. Structures of reaction products

The reaction of the carbidocarbonyl cluster [Fe₆C(CO)₁₆]²⁻ with ruthenium(IV) hydroxochloride Ru(OH)Cl₃ was studied. At 90–100 °C, the reaction gave products of replacement of Fe atoms by Ru in the [Fe₆C(CO)₁₆]²⁻ cluster along with degradation products. Treatment of the replacement products with FeCl₃ afforded the [Fe_2.96Ru_3.04C(CO)₁₇] compound (1), which was characterized by X-ray diffraction analysis. The crystals of cluster 1 are composed of two types of octahedral molecules (1a and 1b) in a ratio of 2 : 1. Molecules 1a are in general positions, and molecules 1b are located on twofold axes. In both molecules, the Fe and Ru atoms are disordered over four of six positions. __________ Published in Russian in Izvestiya Akademii Nauk. Seriya Khimicheskaya, No. 8, pp. 1761–1766, August, 2005.     

Intramolecular Dynamics of Five-coordinate iron Carbonyl Complexes with olefinic ligands as studied by variable-pressure 1H-NMR spectroscopy

Variable-pressure ¹H-NMR Spectroscopy has been used to study the fluxionality of some five-coordinated Fe complexes in solution. For [Fe(CO)₂ 1,3-cyclooctadiene (PPh₃)], the CO site exchange is known (by analogy with [Fe(CO)₃(1,3-cyclooctadiene)]) to be a non-dissociative process, and an activation volume of ca. 0 cm³.mol^?1 was indeed obtained. However, for [Fe(CO₂){2,3-η:O-σ-(7,7-dimethoxybicyclo[2.2.1]hept-2-ene)}(PPh₃)], the activation volume of +5 cm³ mol^?1 suggests that an unprecedented dissociation process is responsible for the CO site exchange. The molecular structure of [Fe(CO)₂(1,3-cyclooctadiene)(PPh₃)] was ascertained by single-crystal X-ray diffractometry. The crystals are triclinic, space group P1 , a = 9.606(3), b = 16.795(2), c = 7.743(8) Å, α = 97.83(4), β = 109.63(4), γ = 83.37(2)°. The structure determination has shown that the complex possesses a tetragonal pyramidal coordination, with the endocyclic C?C bond and PPh₃ occupying basal sites.     

Octacarbonyl Anion Complexes of the Late Lanthanides Ln(CO)8− (Ln=Tm,Yb, Lu) and the 32-Electron Rule

The lanthanide octacarbonyl anion complexes Ln(CO)₈⁻ (Ln=Tm, Yb, Lu) were produced in the gas phase and detected by mass-selected infrared photodissociation spectroscopy in the carbonyl stretching-frequency region. By comparison of the experimental CO-stretching frequencies with calculated data, which are strongly red-shifted with respect to free CO, the Yb(CO)₈⁻ and Lu(CO)₈⁻ complexes were determined to possess octahedral (O_h) symmetry and a doublet X²A_2u (Yb) and singlet X¹A_1g (Lu) electronic ground state, whereas Tm(CO)₈⁻ exhibits a D_4h equilibrium geometry and a triplet X³B_1g ground state. The analysis of the electronic structures revealed that the metal-CO attractive forces come mainly from covalent orbital interactions, which are dominated by [Ln(d)]→(CO)₈ π backdonation and [Ln(d)]←(CO)₈ σ donation (contributes ≈77 and 16 % to covalent bonding, respectively). The metal f orbitals play a very minor role in the bonding. The electronic structure of all three lanthanide complexes obeys the 32-electron rule if only those electrons that occupy the valence orbitals of the metal are considered.     

Ruthenium complexes with ferrocene-based P,C,P pincer ligand

First ruthenium complexes with a ferrocene-based pincer ligand were synthesized. The cyclometallation of 1,3-bis[(di-tert-butylphosphino)methyl]ferrocene with RuCl₂(DMSO)₄ in 2-methoxyethanol afforded the RuCl(CO)[{2,5-(Bu^t ₂PCH₂)₂C₅H₂}Fe(C₅H₅)](RuCl(CO) ) complex (5). Complex 5 reversibly binds CO to form the RuCl(CO)₂ complex (6). The analogous reaction in the presence of NaBAr′₄ (Ar′ = 3,5-(CF₃)₂C₆H₃) produced the cationic complex {Ru(CO)₂ }BAr′₄ (7). The structures of complexes 5 and 7 were established by single-crystal X-ray diffraction. The X-ray diffraction study revealed an agostic interaction between one of the C-H bonds of the axial (exo-oriented with respect to the ferrocene iron atom) tert-butyl group and the Ru atom in complexes 5 and 7. Dedicated to Academician G. A. Abakumov on the occasion of his 70th birthday. Published in Russian in Izvestiya Akademii Nauk. Seriya Khimicheskaya, No. 9, pp. 1695–1701, September, 2007.     

Die Reaktion von tBu2P‐P=P(Me)tBu2 mit [Fe2(CO)9] und [(η2‐C8H14)2Fe(CO)3]

^tBu₂P‐P=P(Me)^tBu₂ reacts with [Fe₂(CO)₉] to give [μ‐(1, 2, 3:4‐η‐^tBu₂P¹‐P²‐P³‐P^4tBu₂){Fe(CO)₃}{Fe(CO)₄}] ( 1 ) and [trans‐(^tBu₂MeP)₂Fe(CO)₃]( 2 ). With [(η²‐C₈H₁₄)₂Fe(CO)₃] in addition to [μ‐(1, 2, 3:4‐η‐^tBu₂P¹‐P²‐P³‐P^4tBu₂){Fe(CO)₂PMe^tBu₂}‐{Fe(CO)₄}] ( 10 ) and 2 also [(μ‐P^tBu₂){μ‐P‐Fe(CO)₃‐PMe^tBu₂}‐{Fe(CO)₃}₂(Fe‐Fe)]( 9 ) is formed. 1 crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P2₁/c with a = 875.0(2), b = 1073.2(2), c = 3162.6(6) pm and β = 94.64(3)?. 2 crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P2₁/c with a = 1643.4(7), b = 1240.29(6), c = 2667.0(5) pm and β = 97.42(2)?. 9 crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P2₁/n with a = 1407.5(5), b = 1649.7(5), c = 1557.9(16) pm and β = 112.87(2)?.     

Synthesis and 1H-, 13C-, and 57Fe-NMR spectra of mono- and bis[tricarbonyl(η4-diene)iron], and (η3-allyl)tetracarbonyliron trifluoroborate complexes

A variety of mono- and bis[Fe(CO)₃(η⁴-diene)] complex with alky, CH₂OH, CHO, COCH₃, COOR, and CN substituents on the 1,3-diene system have been synthesized. Dienes with a (Z)-configuration terminal Me group show steric inhibition of metal complexation resulting in lower yields and formation of tetracarbonyl(η²-diene) and tricarbonyl(η⁴-heterodiene) complexes as additional products. Regioselective attack by C-nucleophiles at the carbonyl C-atoms of the functional group with or without concomitant 1,3 mogration of the Fe(CO)₃ group was used to synthesize polyenes and isoprenoid building blocks as mono- or dinucliar Fe(CO)₃ complexes. Wittig-Horner-type reactions of Fe(co)₃-complexed synthons result in sterospecific formation of (E)-configurated olefins. The ¹H-, ¹³C- and ⁵⁷Fe-NMR spectra of olefinic and allylic organoiron complexes are reported, H,H,C,H, and C,C coupling constants have been evaluated and are analyzed in terms of the geometry of the coordinated diene. The results are corroborated by the crystal structure of tricarbonyl[3–6-η-((E)-6-methyl-3,5-heptadiene-2-one)]iron( 34 ) which shows an unusual distortion of the (CH₃)₂C = group, The ⁵⁷Fe-NMR chemical shifts extend over the ranges of 0–600 ppm for [Fe(CO)₃(η⁴-diene)] complexes, 780–1710 ppm for [Fe(CO)₄(η³-allyl)] [BF₄] and [FeX(CO)₃(η⁴-allyl)] complexes, and 1270–1690 ppm for [Fe(CO)₃(η⁴-enone)] complexes, relative to Fe(CO)₅.     

Synthesis and structures of substituted tetramethylcyclopentadienyl dinuclear metal carbonyl compounds

Cyclopentadienes (C₅Me₄R) [R = Allyl (1), n-Butyl (2), Benzyl (3), and PhMe-2 (4)] reacted with Fe(CO)₅ in refluxing xylene to give new substituted tetramethylcyclopentadienyl dinuclear iron carbonyl complexes [(η ⁵-C₅Me₄R)Fe(CO)(μ-CO)]₂ [R = Allyl (5), n-Butyl (6), Benzyl (7), and PhMe-2 (8)], respectively. The four new complexes 5–8 were characterized by elemental analysis, IR, and ¹H NMR spectra. The crystal structures of complexes 5–7 were determined using single crystal X-ray diffraction. The crystal structure of complex 5 showed that allyl underwent isomerization to give the corresponding methyl-vinyl. A possible mechanism is discussed. The X-ray crystal structures of complexes 5, 6, and 7 confirm the structure with bridging and terminal CO groups. They show that the steric effects of substituents influence the Fe–Fe bond distances of the complexes.     

Coordination chemistry of organometallic polydentate ligand Reactive chemistry of the tridentate ligand trans‐Fe(Ph2PQu‐P)2‐(CO)3 [PhzPQu=2‐diphenyl‐phosphino‐4‐methylquinoline] and molecular structure of [Fe(CO)3(μ‐Ph2PQu)2HgI]+ [HgI3]

Reaction of a new type of bidentate ligand PhPQu [PhPQu = 2‐diphenylphosphino‐4‐methylquinoline] with Fe(CO)₅ in butanol gave trans‐Fe(FpPQu‐P)(CO)₃ (1). Compound 1, which can act as a neutral tridentate organometallic ligand, was reacted with I B, II B metal compounds and a rhodium complex to give six binuclear complexes with Fe? M bonds, Fe(CO)₃ (μ‐Ph₂PQu)MX_n (2–7) [M= Zn(II), Cd(II), Hg(II), Cu(I), Ag(I), Rh(I)], and an ion‐pair complex [Fe(CO)₃ (μ‐Ph₂PQu)₂HgI][HgI₃]^? (8). The structure of 8 was determined by X‐ray crystallography. Complex 8 crystallizes in the space group P‐1 with a = 1.0758(3), b = 1.6210(4), c=1.7155(4)nm; a=75.60(2), β=71.81(2), γ=81.78(2)° and Z = 2 and its structure was refined to give agreement factors of R=0.050 and R_w = 0.057. The Fe‐Hg bond distance is 0.2536nm.