PRODUCTS IN TOPOLOGY

Abstract

Examples are provided which demonstrate that in many cases topological products do not behave as they should. A new product for topological spaces is defined in a natural way by means of interior covers. In general this is no longer a topological space but can be interpreted as categorical product in a category larger than Top. For compact spaces the new product coincides with the old. There is a converse: For symmetric topological spaces X the following conditions are equivalent: (1) X is compact; (2) for each cardinal k the old and the new product X^k coincide; (3) for each compact Hausdorff space Y the old and the new product X x Y coincide. The new product preserves paracompactness, zero-dimensionality (in the covering sense), the Lindelöf property, and regular-closedness. With respect to the new product, a space is N-complete iff it is zerodimensional and R-complete.     

Prefilter spaces and a precompletion of preuniform convergence spaces related to some well-known completions

In non-symmetric Convenient Topology the notion of pre-Cauchy filter is introduced and the construction of a precompletion of a preuniform convergence space is given from which Wyler's completion of a separated uniform limit space [O. Wyler, Ein Komplettierungsfunktor für uniforme Limesräume, Math. Nachr. 46 (1970) 1-12] as well as Weil's Hausdorff completion of a separated uniform space [A. Weil, Sur les Espaces à Structures Uniformes et sur la Topologie Générale, Hermann, Paris, 1937] can be derived (up to isomorphism). By the way, the construct PFil of prefilter spaces, i.e. of those preuniform convergence space which are ‘generated’ by their pre-Cauchy filters, is a strong topological universe filling in a gap in the theory of preuniform convergence spaces.     

The enriched Vietoris monad on representable spaces

Employing a formal analogy between ordered sets and topological spaces, over the past years we have investigated a notion of cocompleteness for topological, approach and other kind of spaces. In this new context, the down-set monad becomes the filter monad, cocomplete ordered set translates to continuous lattice, distributivity means disconnectedness, and so on. Curiously, the dual(?) notion of completeness does not behave as the mirror image of the one of cocompleteness; and in this paper we have a closer look at complete spaces. In particular, we construct the “up-set monad” on representable spaces (in the sense of L. Nachbin for topological spaces, respectively C. Hermida for multicategories); we show that this monad is of Kock–Zöberlein type; we introduce and study a notion of weighted limit similar to the classical notion for enriched categories; and we describe the Kleisli category of our “up-set monad”. We emphasise that these generic categorical notions and results can be indeed connected to more “classical” topology: for topological spaces, the “up-set monad” becomes the lower Vietoris monad, and the statement “X   is totally cocomplete if and only if X^op$X^{\mathrm{op}}$ is totally complete” specialises to O. Wyler's characterisation of the algebras of the Vietoris monad on compact Hausdorff spaces as precisely the continuous lattices.     

Closed structures on categories of topological spaces

The category of all topological spaces and continuous maps and its full subcategory of all T_o-spaces admit (up to isomorphism) precisely one structure of symmetric monoidal closed category (see [2]). In this paper we shall prove the same result for any epireflective subcategory of the category of topological spaces (particularly e.g. for the categories of Hausdorff spaces, regular spaces, Tychonoff spaces).     

An elementary approach to ‘Algebra ∩ topology = compactness’

Herrlich and Strecker characterized the category Comp ₂ of compact Hausdorff spaces as the only nontrivial full epireflective subcategory in the category Top ₂ of all Hausdorff spaces that is concretely isomorphic to a variety in the sense of universal algebra including infinitary operations. The original proof of this result requires Noble's theorem, i.e. a space is compact Hausdorff iff every of its powers is normal, which is far from being elementary. Likewise, Petz' characterization of the class of compact Hausdorff spaces as the only nontrivial epireflective subcategory of Top ₂, which is closed under dense extensions (= epimorphisms in Top ₂) and strictly contained in Top ₂ is based on a result by Kattov stating that a space is compact Hausdorff iff its every closed subspace is H-closed. This note offers an elementary approach for both, instead.Presented at the European Colloquium of Category Theory, Tours, France, 25–31 July 1994.     

FUZZY SOBRIETY AND FUZZY HAUSDORFF

Abstract

Sobriety in the setting of fuzzy topological spaces and its relation to the fuzzy Hausdorff concept(s) is discussed     

PROXIMAL LIMIT SPACES

Abstract

The proximal limit spaces are introduced which fill the gap arising from the existence of proximity spaces, uniform spaces, and uniform limit spaces. It is shown that the proximal limit spaces can be considered as a bireflective subcategory of the topological category of uniform limit spaces. A limit space is induced by a proximal limit space if and only if it is a S₁-limit space.     

HAUSDORFF NEARNESS SPACES

Abstract

A categorical characterization of the category Haus of Hausdorft topological spaces within the category Top of topological spaces is given. A notion of a Hausdorff nearness space is then introduced and it is proved that the resulting subcategory Haus Near of the category Near of nearness spaces fulfills exactly the same characterization as derived for Haus in Top. Properties of Haus Near and relations to other important sub-categories of Near are studied.     

SYNTOPOFORMIC SPACES (SYNTOPOGENOUS LIMIT SPACES)

Abstract

Császár generalized the uniform spaces, the proximity spaces and the topological spaces to syntopogenous spaces. Cook and Fischer generalized the uniform spaces to uniform limit spaces. Finally Marny generalized the proximity spaces to proximal limit spaces. Analogously we generalize the syntopogenous spaces to syntopoformic spaces (syntopogenous limit spaces). These spaces include all the above mentioned in a suitable sense. We extend some of the well-known results of compactness and completeness to syntopoformic spaces.     

An asymmetric Ellis theorem

In 1957 Robert Ellis proved that a group with a locally compact Hausdorff topology T making all translations continuous also has jointly continuous multiplication and continuous inversion, and is thus a topological group. The theorem does not apply to locally compact asymmetric spaces such as the reals with addition and the topology of upper open rays. We first show a bitopological Ellis theorem, and then introduce a generalization of locally compact Hausdorff, called locally skew compact, and a topological dual, Tk, to obtain the following asymmetric Ellis theorem which applies to the example above:Whenever (X,⋅,T) is a group with a locally skew compact topology making all translations continuous, then multiplication is jointly continuous in both (X,⋅,T) and (X,⋅,Tk), and inversion is a homeomorphism between (X,T) and (X,Tk).This generalizes the classical Ellis theorem, because T=Tk when (X,T) is locally compact Hausdorff.     

THE FORGETFUL FUNCTOR Cont → Prox IS TOPOLOGICAL

Abstract

It is shown that the forgetful functor from the category of contiguity spaces to the category of generalized proximity spaces is topological, and that the right adjoint right inverse of this functor extends the inverse of the forgetful functor from the category of totally bounded uniform spaces to the category of proximity spaces.     

Separation properties in algebraic categories of topological spaces

Full subcategories C ? Top of the category of topological spaces, which are algebraic over Set in the sense of Herrlich [2], have pleasant separation properties, mostly subject to additional closedness assumptions. For instance, every C-object is a T₁-space, if the two-element discrete space belongs to C. Moreover, if C is closed under the formation of finite powers in Top and even varietal [2], then every C-object is Hausdorff. Hence, the T₂-axiom turns out to be (nearly) superfluous in Herrlich's and Strecker's characterization of the category of compact Hausdorff spaces [1], although it is essential for the proof.If we think of C-objects X as universal algebras (with possibly infinite operations), then the subalgebras of X form the closed sets of a compact topology on X, provided that the ordinal spaces [0, β] belong to C. This generalizes a result in [3]. The subalgebra topology is used to prove criterions for the Hausdorffness of every space in C, if C is only algebraic.     

BIFRAMES AND BISPACES

Abstract

The concept of a biframe is introduced. Then the known dual adjunction between topological spaces and frames (i.e. local lattices) is extended to one between bispaces (i.e. bitopological spaces) and biframes. The largest duality contained in this dual adjunction defines the sober bispaces, which are also characterized in terms of the sober spaces. The topological and the frame-theoretic concepts of regularity, complete regularity and compactness are extended to bispaces and biframes respectively. For the bispaces these concepts are found to coincide with those introduced earlier by J.C. Kelly, E.P. Lane, S. Salbany and others. The Stone-?ech compactification (compact regular coreflection) of a biframe is constructed without the Axiom of Choice.     

Local connectedness in merotopic spaces

Abstract

In this paper uniformly locally uniformly connected merotopic spaces are studied. It turns out that their structural behaviour is essentially similar to that one of locally connected topological spaces. The introduced concept is also investigated for spaces of functions between filter-merotopic spaces (e.g. topological spaces, proximity spaces, convergence spaces) and the relationship to other concepts of local connectedness is clarified. In particular, the category of uniformly locally uniformly connected filter-merotopic spaces is Cartesian closed.     

Compact Hausdorff fuzzy topological spaces are topological

Many examples of compact fuzzy topological spaces which are highly non topological are known [5, 6]. Equally many examples of Hausdorff fuzzy topological spaces which are highly non topological can be given. In this paper we show that the two properties - compact and Hausdorff - combined however necessarily imply that the fuzzy topological space is topological. This at once solves some open questions with regard to the compactification of fuzzy topological spaces [8]. It also emphasizes once more the particular role played by compact Hausdorff topological spaces not only in the category of topological spaces but even in the category of fuzzy topological spaces.     

PAIRWISE ALMOST COMPACT SPACES

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this paper is to investigate pairwise almost compact bitopological spaces. These spaces satisfy a bitopological compactness criterion which is strictly weaker than pairwise C-compactness and is independent of other well-known bitopological compactness notions. Pairwise continuous maps from such spaces to pairwise Hausdorff spaces are pairwise almost closed, the property is invariant under suitably continuous maps, is inherited by regularly closed subspaces and may be characterized in terms of certain covers as well as the adherent convergence of certain open filter bases. Some new natural bitopological separation axioms are introduced and in conjunction with pairwise almost compactness yield interesting results, including a sufficient condition for the bitopological complete separation of disjoint regularly closed sets by semi-continuous functions.     

TOPOLOGICAL CATEGORIES AND CLOSURE OPERATORS

Abstract

It is shown that the category CS of closure spaces is a topological category. For each epireflective subcategory A of a topological category X a functor F _A :X → X is defined and used to extend to the general case of topological categories some results given in [4], [5] and [10] for epireflective subcategories of the category Top of topological spaces.     

Weak separation axioms and weak covering properties

We identify some remnants of normality and call them rudimentary normality, generalize the concept of submetacompact spaces to that of a weakly subparacompact space and that of a weakly^? subparacompact space, and make a simultaneous generalization of collectionwise normality and screenability with the introduction of what is to be called collectionwise σ-normality. With these weak properties, we show that,1) on weakly subparacompact spaces, countable compactness = compactness, ω₁-compactness = Lindelöfness;2) on weakly subparacompact Hausdorff spaces with rudimentary normality, regularity = normality = countable paracompactness; and3) on weakly subparacompact regular T₁-spaces with rudimentary normality, collectionwise σ-normality = screenability = collectionwise normality = paracompactness.The famous Normal Moore Space Conjecture is thus given an even more striking appearance and Worrell and Wicke?s factorization of paracompactness (over Hausdorff spaces) along with Krajewski?s are combined and strengthened. The methodology extends itself to the factorization of paracompactness on locally compact, locally connected spaces in the manner of Gruenhage and on locally compact spaces in that of Tall, and to the factorization of subparacompactness and metacompactness in the genre of Katuta, Chaber, Junnila and Price and Smith and that of Boone, improving all of them.     

Injective spaces via adjunction

The work of the present author and his coauthors over the past years gives evidence that it may be useful to regard each topological space as a kind of enriched category, by interpreting the convergence relation x→x between ultrafilters and points of a topological space X as arrows in X. Naturally, this point of view opens the door to the use of concepts and ideas from enriched Category Theory for the investigation of topological spaces. Topological theories introduced by the author provide a convenient general setting for appropriately transferring these concepts and ideas to the world of topological spaces and some other geometric objects such as approach spaces. Using tools like adjunction and the Yoneda lemma, we show that the cocomplete spaces are precisely the injective spaces, and they are algebras for a suitable monad on . This way we obtain enriched versions of known results about injective topological spaces and continuous lattices.