On p-intersection representations

For a graph G = (V,E) and integer p, a p-intersection representation is a family F = {S_x: × E V} of subsets of a set S with the property that |S_u ∩ S_ν| ≥ p ∩ {u, ν} E E. It is conjectured in [1] that θ_p(G) ≤ θ (K_n/2,n/2) (1 + o(1)) holds for any graph with n vertices. This is known to be true for p = 1 by [4]. In [1], θ (K_n/2,n/2) ≥ (n² + (2p− 1n)n)/4p is proved for any n and p. Here, we show that this is asymptotically best possible. Further, we provide a bound on θp(G) for all graphs with bounded degree. In particular, we prove θp(G) ≤ O(n^1/p) for any graph Gwith the maximum degree bounded by a constant. Finally, we also investigate the value of θ_p for trees. Improving on an earlier result of M. Jacobson, A. Kézdy, and D. West, (The 2-intersection number of paths and bounded-degree trees, preprint), we show that θ₂(T) ≤ O(d√n) for any tree T with maximum-degree d and θ₂(T) ≤ O(n^3/4) for any tree on n vertices. We conjecture that our results can be further improved and that θ₂(T) ≤ O(d√n) as long as Δ(T) ≤ √n. If this conjecture is true, our method gives θ₂(T) ≤ O(n^3/4) for any tree T which would be the best possible. © 1996 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Packing in regular graphs

A set S of vertices in a graph G is a packing if the vertices in S are pairwise at distance at least 3 apart in G. The packing number of G, denoted by ρ(G), is the maximum cardinality of a packing in G. Favaron [Discrete Math. 158 (1996), 287–293] showed that if G is a connected cubic graph of order n different from the Petersen graph, then ρ(G) ≥ n/8. In this paper, we generalize Favaron’s result. We show that for k ≥ 3, if G is a connected k-regular graph of order n that is not a diameter-2 Moore graph, then ρ(G) ≥ n/(k² ? 1).     

Degree Bounded Spanning Trees

In this paper, we give a sufficient condition for a graph to have a degree bounded spanning tree. Let n ≥ 1, k ≥ 3, c ≥ 0 and G be an n-connected graph. Suppose that for every independent set ${S \subseteq V(G)}In this paper, we give a sufficient condition for a graph to have a degree bounded spanning tree. Let n ≥ 1, k ≥ 3, c ≥ 0 and G be an n-connected graph. Suppose that for every independent set S í V(G){S \subseteq V(G)} of cardinality n(k−1) + c + 2, there exists a vertex set X í S{X \subseteq S} of cardinality k such that the degree sum of vertices in X is at least |V(G)| − c −1. Then G has a spanning tree T with maximum degree at most k+éc/nù{k+\lceil c/n\rceil} and ?_{v ? V(T)}max{d_T(v)-k,0} ￡ c{\sum_{v\in V(T)}\max\{d_T(v)-k,0\}\leq c} .     

The average Steiner distance of a graph

The average distance μ(G) of a graph G is the average among the distances between all pairs of vertices in G. For n ≥ 2, the average Steiner n-distance μ_n(G) of a connected graph G is the average Steiner distance over all sets of n vertices in G. It is shown that for a connected weighted graph G, μ_n(G) ≤ μ_k(G) + μ_n+1−k(G) where 2 ≤ k ≤ n − 1. The range for the average Steiner n-distance of a connected graph G in terms of n and |V(G)| is established. Moreover, for a tree T and integer k, 2 ≤ k ≤ n − 1, it is shown that μ_n(T) ≤ (n/k)μ_k(T) and the range for μ_n(T) in terms of n and |V(T)| is established. Two efficient algorithms for finding the average Steiner n-distance of a tree are outlined. © 1996 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Pan-connectedness of graphs with large neighborhood unions

Let G be a simple graph with n vertices. For any v ? V(G){v \in V(G)} , let N(v)={u ? V(G): uv ? E(G)}{N(v)=\{u \in V(G): uv \in E(G)\}} , NC(G) = min{|N(u) èN(v)|: u, v ? V(G){NC(G)= \min \{|N(u) \cup N(v)|: u, v \in V(G)} and uv \not ? E(G)}{uv \not \in E(G)\}} , and NC₂(G) = min{|N(u) èN(v)|: u, v ? V(G){NC_2(G)= \min\{|N(u) \cup N(v)|: u, v \in V(G)} and u and v has distance 2 in E(G)}. Let l ≥ 1 be an integer. A graph G on n ≥ l vertices is [l, n]-pan-connected if for any u, v ? V(G){u, v \in V(G)} , and any integer m with l ≤ m ≤ n, G has a (u, v)-path of length m. In 1998, Wei and Zhu (Graphs Combinatorics 14:263–274, 1998) proved that for a three-connected graph on n ≥ 7 vertices, if NC(G) ≥ n − δ(G) + 1, then G is [6, n]-pan-connected. They conjectured that such graphs should be [5, n]-pan-connected. In this paper, we prove that for a three-connected graph on n ≥ 7 vertices, if NC ₂(G) ≥ n − δ(G) + 1, then G is [5, n]-pan-connected. Consequently, the conjecture of Wei and Zhu is proved as NC ₂(G) ≥ NC(G). Furthermore, we show that the lower bound is best possible and characterize all 2-connected graphs with NC ₂(G) ≥ n − δ(G) + 1 which are not [4, n]-pan-connected.     

List Colorings of K5‐Minor‐Free Graphs With Special List Assignments

The following question was raised by Bruce Richter. Let G be a planar, 3‐connected graph that is not a complete graph. Denoting by d(v) the degree of vertex v, is G L‐list colorable for every list assignment L with |L(v)| = min{d(v), 6} for all v∈V(G)? More generally, we ask for which pairs (r, k) the following question has an affirmative answer. Let r and k be the integers and let G be a K₅‐minor‐free r‐connected graph that is not a Gallai tree (i.e. at least one block of G is neither a complete graph nor an odd cycle). Is G L‐list colorable for every list assignment L with |L(v)| = min{d(v), k} for all v∈V(G)? We investigate this question by considering the components of G[S_k], where S_k: = {v∈V(G)|d(v)8k} is the set of vertices with small degree in G. We are especially interested in the minimum distance d(S_k) in G between the components of G[S_k]. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 71:18–30, 2012     

Rooted induced trees in triangle‐free graphs

For a graph G, let t(G) denote the maximum number of vertices in an induced subgraph of Gthat is a tree. Further, for a vertex v∈V(G), let t(G, v) denote the maximum number of vertices in an induced subgraph of Gthat is a tree, with the extra condition that the tree must contain v. The minimum of t(G) (t(G, v), respectively) over all connected triangle‐free graphs G(and vertices v∈V(G)) on nvertices is denoted by t₃(n) (t(n)). Clearly, t(G, v)?t(G) for all v∈V(G). In this note, we solve the extremal problem of maximizing |G| for given t(G, v), given that Gis connected and triangle‐free. We show that and determine the unique extremal graphs. Thus, we get as corollary that $t_3(n)\ge t_3^{\ast}(n) = \lceil {\frac{1}{2}}(1+{\sqrt{8n-7}})\rceilFor a graph G, let t(G) denote the maximum number of vertices in an induced subgraph of Gthat is a tree. Further, for a vertex v∈V(G), let t(G, v) denote the maximum number of vertices in an induced subgraph of Gthat is a tree, with the extra condition that the tree must contain v. The minimum of t(G) (t(G, v), respectively) over all connected triangle‐free graphs G(and vertices v∈V(G)) on nvertices is denoted by t₃(n) (t(n)). Clearly, t(G, v)?t(G) for all v∈V(G). In this note, we solve the extremal problem of maximizing |G| for given t(G, v), given that Gis connected and triangle‐free. We show that and determine the unique extremal graphs. Thus, we get as corollary that $t_3(n)\ge t_3^{\ast}(n) = \lceil {\frac{1}{2}}(1+{\sqrt{8n-7}})\rceil$, improving a recent result by Fox, Loh and Sudakov. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 64: 206–209, 2010     

An Introduction to Closed/Open Neighborhood Sums: Minimax, Maximin, and Spread

For a graph G of order |V(G)| = n and a real-valued mapping f:V(G)?\mathbbR{f:V(G)\rightarrow\mathbb{R}}, if S ì V(G){S\subset V(G)} then f(S)=?_{w ? S} f(w){f(S)=\sum_{w\in S} f(w)} is called the weight of S under f. The closed (respectively, open) neighborhood sum of f is the maximum weight of a closed (respectively, open) neighborhood under f, that is, NS[f]=max{f(N[v])|v ? V(G)}{NS[f]={\rm max}\{f(N[v])|v \in V(G)\}} and NS(f)=max{f(N(v))|v ? V(G)}{NS(f)={\rm max}\{f(N(v))|v \in V(G)\}}. The closed (respectively, open) lower neighborhood sum of f is the minimum weight of a closed (respectively, open) neighborhood under f, that is, NS^-[f]=min{f(N[v])|v ? V(G)}{NS^{-}[f]={\rm min}\{f(N[v])|v\in V(G)\}} and NS^-(f)=min{f(N(v))|v ? V(G)}{NS^{-}(f)={\rm min}\{f(N(v))|v\in V(G)\}}. For W ì \mathbbR{W\subset \mathbb{R}}, the closed and open neighborhood sum parameters are NS_W[G]=min{NS[f]|f:V(G)? W{NS_W[G]={\rm min}\{NS[f]|f:V(G)\rightarrow W} is a bijection} and NS_W(G)=min{NS(f)|f:V(G)? W{NS_W(G)={\rm min}\{NS(f)|f:V(G)\rightarrow W} is a bijection}. The lower neighbor sum parameters are NS^-_W[G]=maxNS^-[f]|f:V(G)? W{NS^{-}_W[G]={\rm max}NS^{-}[f]|f:V(G)\rightarrow W} is a bijection} and NS^-_W(G)=maxNS^-(f)|f:V(G)? W{NS^{-}_W(G)={\rm max}NS^{-}(f)|f:V(G)\rightarrow W} is a bijection}. For bijections f:V(G)? {1,2,?,n}{f:V(G)\rightarrow \{1,2,\ldots,n\}} we consider the parameters NS[G], NS(G), NS ⁻[G] and NS ⁻(G), as well as two parameters minimizing the maximum difference in neighborhood sums.     

The 2-intersection number of paths and bounded-degree trees

We represent a graph by assigning each vertex a finite set such that vertices are adjacent if and only if the corresponding sets have at least two common elements. The 2-intersection number θ₂(G) of a graph G is the minimum size of the union of sets in such a representation. We prove that the maximum order of a path that can be represented in this way using t elements is between (t² - 19t + 4)/4 and (t² - t + 6)/4, making θ₂(P_n) asymptotic to 2√n. We also show the existence of a constant c depending on ? such that, for any tree T with maximum degree at most d, θ₂(T) ≤ c(√n)^1+?. When the maximum degree is not bounded, there is an n-vertex tree T with θ₂(T) > .945n^2/3. © 1995 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Efficient Algorithms for Finding a Core of a Tree with a Specified Length

Acoreof a graphGis a pathPinGthat is central with respect to the property of minimizingd(P)=∑_v∈V(G)d(v, P), whered(v, P) is the distance from vertexvto pathP. This paper presents efficient algorithms for finding a core of a tree with a specified length. The sequential algorithm runs inO(n log n) time, wherenis the size of the tree. The parallel algorithm runs inO(log²n) time usingO(n) processors on an EREW PRAM model.     

Partitions of a graph into paths with prescribed endvertices and lengths

For a graph G, let σ₂(G) denote the minimum degree sum of a pair of nonadjacent vertices. We conjecture that if |V(G)| = n = Σ^k_{i = 1} a_i and σ₂(G) ≥ n + k − 1, then for any k vertices v₁, v₂,…, v_k in G, there exist vertex‐disjoint paths P₁, P₂,…, P_k such that |V(P_i)| = a_i and v_i is an endvertex of P_i for 1 ≤ i ≤ k. In this paper, we verify the conjecture for the cases where almost all a_i ≤ 5, and the cases where k ≤ 3. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Graph Theory 34: 163–169, 2000     

Gargano,Lewinter and Malerba问题的解

§1　IntroductionLet G be a graph with vertex-set V(G) ={ v1 ,v2 ,...,vn} .A labeling of G is a bijectionL:V(G)→{ 1,2 ,...,n} ,where L (vi) is the label of a vertex vi.A labeled graph is anordered pair (G,L) consisting of a graph G and its labeling L.Definition1.An increasing nonconsecutive path in a labeled graph(G,L) is a path(u1 ,u2 ,...,uk) in G such thatL(ui) + 1相似文献   

The upper traceable number of a graph

For a nontrivial connected graph G of order n and a linear ordering s: v ₁, v ₂, …, v _n of vertices of G, define . The traceable number t(G) of a graph G is t(G) = min{d(s)} and the upper traceable number t ⁺(G) of G is t ⁺(G) = max{d(s)}, where the minimum and maximum are taken over all linear orderings s of vertices of G. We study upper traceable numbers of several classes of graphs and the relationship between the traceable number and upper traceable number of a graph. All connected graphs G for which t ⁺(G) − t(G) = 1 are characterized and a formula for the upper traceable number of a tree is established. Research supported by Srinakharinwirot University, the Thailand Research Fund and the Commission on Higher Education, Thailand under the grant number MRG 5080075.     

Mean-Field Conditions for Percolation on Finite Graphs

Let {G _n } be a sequence of finite transitive graphs with vertex degree d = d(n) and |G _n | = n. Denote by p ^t (v, v) the return probability after t steps of the non-backtracking random walk on G _n . We show that if p ^t (v, v) has quasi-random properties, then critical bond-percolation on G _n behaves as it would on a random graph. More precisely, if $\mathop {\rm {lim\, sup\,}} \limits_{n} n^{1/3} \sum\limits_{t = 1}^{n^{1/3}} {t{\bf p}^t(v,v) < \infty ,}$ then the size of the largest component in p-bond-percolation with ${p =\frac{1+O(n^{-1/3})}{d-1}}Let {G _n } be a sequence of finite transitive graphs with vertex degree d = d(n) and |G _n | = n. Denote by p ^t (v, v) the return probability after t steps of the non-backtracking random walk on G _n . We show that if p ^t (v, v) has quasi-random properties, then critical bond-percolation on G _n behaves as it would on a random graph. More precisely, if

lim sup  n n1/3 ?t = 1n1/3 tpt(v,v) < ￥,\mathop {\rm {lim\, sup\,}} \limits_{n} n^{1/3} \sum\limits_{t = 1}^{n^{1/3}} {t{\bf p}^t(v,v) < \infty ,}      15. Orientations of circle graphs      R. C. Read  D. Rotem  J. Urrutia 《Journal of Graph Theory》1982,6(3):325-341 Let C(v1, …,vn) be a system consisting of a circle C with chords v1, …,vn on it having different endpoints. Define a graph G having vertex set V(G) = {v1, …,vn} and for which vertices vi and vj are adjacent in G if the chords vi and vj intersect. Such a graph will be called a circle graph. The chords divide the interior of C into a number of regions. We give a method which associates to each such region an orientation of the edges of G. For a given C(v1, …,vn) the number m of different orientations corresponding to it satisfies q + 1 ≤ m ≤ n + q + 1, where q is the number of edges in G. An oriented graph obtained from a diagram C(v1, …,vn) as above is called an oriented circle graph (OCG). We show that transitive orientations of permutation graphs are OCGs, and give a characterization of tournaments which are OCGs. When the region is a peripheral one, the orientation of G is acyclic. In this case we define a special orientation of the complement of G, and use this to develop an improved algorithm for finding a maximum independent set in G.      16. Relatively Free Nilpotent Torsion-Free Groups and Their Lie Algebras      C. Kofinas  A. I. Papistas 《代数通讯》2013,41(3):843-880 Let K be a field of characteristic zero. For a torsion-free finitely generated nilpotent group G, we naturally associate four finite dimensional nilpotent Lie algebras over K, ? K (G), grad(?)(? K (G)), grad(g)(exp ? K (G)), and L K (G). Let 𝔗 c be a torsion-free variety of nilpotent groups of class at most c. For a positive integer n, with n ≥ 2, let F n (𝔗 c ) be the relatively free group of rank n in 𝔗 c . We prove that ? K (F n (𝔗 c )) is relatively free in some variety of nilpotent Lie algebras, and ? K (F n (𝔗 c )) ? L K (F n (𝔗 c )) ? grad(?)(? K (F n (𝔗 c ))) ? grad(g)(exp ? K (F n (𝔗 c ))) as Lie algebras in a natural way. Furthermore, F n (𝔗 c ) is a Magnus nilpotent group. Let G 1 and G 2 be torsion-free finitely generated nilpotent groups which are quasi-isometric. We prove that if G 1 and G 2 are relatively free of finite rank, then they are isomorphic. Let L be a relatively free nilpotent Lie algebra over ? of finite rank freely generated by a set X. Give on L the structure of a group R, say, by means of the Baker–Campbell–Hausdorff formula, and let H be the subgroup of R generated by the set X. We show that H is relatively free in some variety of nilpotent groups; freely generated by the set X, H is Magnus and L ? ??(H) ? L ?(H) as Lie algebras. For relatively free residually torsion-free nilpotent groups, we prove that ? K and L K are isomorphic as Lie algebras. We also give an example of a finitely generated Magnus nilpotent group G, not relatively free, such that ??(G) is not isomorphic to L ?(G) as Lie algebras.      17. Trees with Equal Domination and Restrained Domination Numbers      Peter Dankelmann  Johannes H. Hattingh  Michael A. Henning  Henda C. Swart 《Journal of Global Optimization》2006,34(4):597-607 Let G = (V,E) be a graph and let S V. The set S is a packing in G if the vertices of S are pairwise at distance at least three apart in G. The set S is a dominating set (DS) if every vertex in V − S is adjacent to a vertex in S. Further, if every vertex in V − S is also adjacent to a vertex in V − S, then S is a restrained dominating set (RDS). The domination number of G, denoted by γ(G), is the minimum cardinality of a DS of G, while the restrained domination number of G, denoted by γr(G), is the minimum cardinality of a RDS of G. The graph G is γ-excellent if every vertex of G belongs to some minimum DS of G. A constructive characterization of trees with equal domination and restrained domination numbers is presented. As a consequence of this characterization we show that the following statements are equivalent: (i) T is a tree with γ(T)=γr(T); (ii) T is a γ-excellent tree and T ≠ K2; and (iii) T is a tree that has a unique maximum packing and this set is a dominating set of T. We show that if T is a tree of order n with ℓ leaves, then γr(T) ≤ (n + ℓ + 1)/2, and we characterize those trees achieving equality.      18. An extremal problem on non-full colorable graphs      Changhong Lu  Mingqing Zhai 《Discrete Applied Mathematics》2007,155(16):2165-2173 For a given graph G of order n, a k-L(2,1)-labelling is defined as a function f:V(G)→{0,1,2,…k} such that |f(u)-f(v)|?2 when dG(u,v)=1 and |f(u)-f(v)|?1 when dG(u,v)=2. The L(2,1)-labelling number of G, denoted by λ(G), is the smallest number k such that G has a k-L(2,1)-labelling. The hole index ρ(G) of G is the minimum number of integers not used in a λ(G)-L(2,1)-labelling of G. We say G is full-colorable if ρ(G)=0; otherwise, it will be called non-full colorable. In this paper, we consider the graphs with λ(G)=2m and ρ(G)=m, where m is a positive integer. Our main work generalized a result by Fishburn and Roberts [No-hole L(2,1)-colorings, Discrete Appl. Math. 130 (2003) 513-519].      19. Total domination in graphs with minimum degree three      Odile Favaron  Michael A. Henning  Christina M. Mynhart  Joël Puech 《Journal of Graph Theory》2000,34(1):9-19 A set S of vertices of a graph G is a total dominating set, if every vertex of V(G) is adjacent to some vertex in S. The total domination number of G, denoted by γt(G), is the minimum cardinality of a total dominating set of G. We prove that, if G is a graph of order n with minimum degree at least 3, then γt(G) ≤ 7n/13. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Graph Theory 34:9–19, 2000      20. Algebraic connectivity and the characteristic set of a graph      R. B. Bapat  Sukanta Pati 《Linear and Multilinear Algebra》2013,61(2-3):247-273

Orientations of circle graphs

Let C(v₁, …,v_n) be a system consisting of a circle C with chords v₁, …,v_n on it having different endpoints. Define a graph G having vertex set V(G) = {v₁, …,v_n} and for which vertices v_i and v_j are adjacent in G if the chords v_i and v_j intersect. Such a graph will be called a circle graph. The chords divide the interior of C into a number of regions. We give a method which associates to each such region an orientation of the edges of G. For a given C(v₁, …,v_n) the number m of different orientations corresponding to it satisfies q + 1 ≤ m ≤ n + q + 1, where q is the number of edges in G. An oriented graph obtained from a diagram C(v₁, …,v_n) as above is called an oriented circle graph (OCG). We show that transitive orientations of permutation graphs are OCGs, and give a characterization of tournaments which are OCGs. When the region is a peripheral one, the orientation of G is acyclic. In this case we define a special orientation of the complement of G, and use this to develop an improved algorithm for finding a maximum independent set in G.     

Relatively Free Nilpotent Torsion-Free Groups and Their Lie Algebras

Let K be a field of characteristic zero. For a torsion-free finitely generated nilpotent group G, we naturally associate four finite dimensional nilpotent Lie algebras over K, ? _K (G), grad^(?)(? _K (G)), grad^(g)(exp ? _K (G)), and L _K (G). Let 𝔗 _c be a torsion-free variety of nilpotent groups of class at most c. For a positive integer n, with n ≥ 2, let F _n (𝔗 _c ) be the relatively free group of rank n in 𝔗 _c . We prove that ? _K (F _n (𝔗 _c )) is relatively free in some variety of nilpotent Lie algebras, and ? _K (F _n (𝔗 _c )) ? L _K (F _n (𝔗 _c )) ? grad^(?)(? _K (F _n (𝔗 _c ))) ? grad^(g)(exp ? _K (F _n (𝔗 _c ))) as Lie algebras in a natural way. Furthermore, F _n (𝔗 _c ) is a Magnus nilpotent group. Let G ₁ and G ₂ be torsion-free finitely generated nilpotent groups which are quasi-isometric. We prove that if G ₁ and G ₂ are relatively free of finite rank, then they are isomorphic. Let L be a relatively free nilpotent Lie algebra over ? of finite rank freely generated by a set X. Give on L the structure of a group R, say, by means of the Baker–Campbell–Hausdorff formula, and let H be the subgroup of R generated by the set X. We show that H is relatively free in some variety of nilpotent groups; freely generated by the set X, H is Magnus and L ? ?_?(H) ? L _?(H) as Lie algebras. For relatively free residually torsion-free nilpotent groups, we prove that ? _K and L _K are isomorphic as Lie algebras. We also give an example of a finitely generated Magnus nilpotent group G, not relatively free, such that ?_?(G) is not isomorphic to L _?(G) as Lie algebras.     

Trees with Equal Domination and Restrained Domination Numbers

Let G = (V,E) be a graph and let S V. The set S is a packing in G if the vertices of S are pairwise at distance at least three apart in G. The set S is a dominating set (DS) if every vertex in V − S is adjacent to a vertex in S. Further, if every vertex in V − S is also adjacent to a vertex in V − S, then S is a restrained dominating set (RDS). The domination number of G, denoted by γ(G), is the minimum cardinality of a DS of G, while the restrained domination number of G, denoted by γ_r(G), is the minimum cardinality of a RDS of G. The graph G is γ-excellent if every vertex of G belongs to some minimum DS of G. A constructive characterization of trees with equal domination and restrained domination numbers is presented. As a consequence of this characterization we show that the following statements are equivalent: (i) T is a tree with γ(T)=γ_r(T); (ii) T is a γ-excellent tree and T ≠ K₂; and (iii) T is a tree that has a unique maximum packing and this set is a dominating set of T. We show that if T is a tree of order n with ℓ leaves, then γ_r(T) ≤ (n + ℓ + 1)/2, and we characterize those trees achieving equality.     

An extremal problem on non-full colorable graphs

For a given graph G of order n, a k-L(2,1)-labelling is defined as a function f:V(G)→{0,1,2,…k} such that |f(u)-f(v)|?2 when d_G(u,v)=1 and |f(u)-f(v)|?1 when d_G(u,v)=2. The L(2,1)-labelling number of G, denoted by λ(G), is the smallest number k such that G has a k-L(2,1)-labelling. The hole index ρ(G) of G is the minimum number of integers not used in a λ(G)-L(2,1)-labelling of G. We say G is full-colorable if ρ(G)=0; otherwise, it will be called non-full colorable. In this paper, we consider the graphs with λ(G)=2m and ρ(G)=m, where m is a positive integer. Our main work generalized a result by Fishburn and Roberts [No-hole L(2,1)-colorings, Discrete Appl. Math. 130 (2003) 513-519].     

Total domination in graphs with minimum degree three

A set S of vertices of a graph G is a total dominating set, if every vertex of V(G) is adjacent to some vertex in S. The total domination number of G, denoted by γ_t(G), is the minimum cardinality of a total dominating set of G. We prove that, if G is a graph of order n with minimum degree at least 3, then γ_t(G) ≤ 7n/13. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Graph Theory 34:9–19, 2000