共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 0 毫秒
1.
Armstrong TA Bettoni D Bharadwaj V Biino C Borreani G Broemmelsiek D Buzzo A Calabrese R Ceccucci A Cester R Church M Dalpiaz P Dalpiaz PF Dimitroyannis D Fabbri M Fast J Gianoli A Ginsburg CM Gollwitzer K Govi G Hahn A Hasan M Hsueh S Lewis R Luppi E Macrí M Majewska AM Mandelkern M Marchetto F Marinelli M Marques J Marsh W Martini M Masuzawa M Menichetti E Migliori A Mussa R Palestini S Pallavicini M Passaggio S Pastrone N Patrignani C Peoples J Petrucci F Pia MG Pordes S Rapidis P Ray R 《Physical review D: Particles and fields》1996,54(11):7067-7070
2.
3.
Baltrusaitis RM Becker JJ Blaylock GT Bolton T Brown JS Bunnell KO Burnett TH Cassell RE Coffman D Cook V Coward DH Cui H Dado S Del Papa C Dorfan DE Dubois GP Duncan AL Eigen G Einsweiler KF Eisenstein BI Fabrizio R Favart D Gladding G Grancagnolo F Guy AD Hamilton RP Hauser J Heusch CA Hitlin DG Köpke L Lockman WS Mallik U Matthews CG Mockett PM Moss L Mozley RF Nappi A Nemati B Odian A Partridge R Perrier J Plaetzer SA Richman JD Roehrig J Russell JJ Sadrozinski HF Scarlatella M Schalk TL 《Physical review letters》1986,56(2):107-110
4.
Coffman D DeJongh F Dubois G Eigen G Hauser J Hitlin DG Matthews CG Mincer A Richman JD Wisniewski WJ Zhu Y Burchell M Dorfan DE Drinkard J Gatto C Hamilton RP Heusch CA Köpke L Lockman WS Partridge R Sadrozinski HF Scarlatella M Schalk TL Seiden A Weinstein AJ Weseler S Xu R Becker JJ Blaylock GT Eisenstein BI Freese T Gladding G Izen JM Plaetzer SA Simopoulos C Spadafora AL Stockdale IE Tripsas B Mallik U Roco M Wang MZ Adler J Bolton T Brient JC Bunnell KO Cassell RE Coward DH Einsweiler KF 《Physical review D: Particles and fields》1990,41(5):1410-1413
5.
6.
Augustin JE Calcaterra A Cosme G Couchot F Dudelzak B Fulda F Grosdidier G Jean-Marie B Jullian S Lalanne D Lepeltier V Mané F Paulot C Roy P Szklarz G Bisello D Busetto G Castro A Limentani S Nigro M Penzo M Pescara L Posocco M Sartori P Stanco L Antonelli A Baldini R Capon G Ajaltouni Z Falvard A Jousset J Michel B Montret JC 《Physical review letters》1988,60(22):2238-2241
7.
Bai Z Blaylock GT Bolton T Browder TE Brown JS Bunnell KO Burnett TH Cassell RE Coffman D Cook V DeJongh F Dorfan DE Drinkard J Dubois GP Eigen G Einsweiler KF Eisenstein BI Freese T Gatto C Gladding G Hauser J Heusch CA Hitlin DG Izen JM Kim PC Labs J Li A Lockman WS Mallik U Matthews CG Mincer AI Mir R Mockett PM Mozley RF Nemati B Odian A Parrish L Partridge R Pitman D Plaetzer SA Richman JD Sadrozinski HF Scarlatella M Schalk TL Schindler RH Seiden A Simopoulos C Stockdale IE Toki W 《Physical review letters》1990,65(11):1309-1312
8.
9.
10.
Coffman D Dubois GP Eigen G Hauser J Hitlin DG Matthews CG Mincer A Richman JD Wisniewski WJ Zhu Y Burchell M Dorfan DE Drinkard J Gatto C Hamilton RP Heusch CA Köpke L Lockman WS Partridge R Perrier J Sadrozinski HF Scarlatella M Schalk TL Seiden A Weinstein AJ Xu R Becker JJ Blaylock GT Eisenstein BI Freese T Gladding G Izen JM Plaetzer SA Simopoulos C Spadafora AL Stockdale IE Thaler JJ Tripsas B Mallik U Adler J Bolton T Brient JC Bunnell KO Cassell RE Coward DH Einsweiler KF Grab C 《Physical review D: Particles and fields》1989,40(11):3788
11.
Bai JZ Bian JG Chen GP Chen HF Chen SJ Chen SM Chen Y Chen YQ Chen YB Cheng BS Cui XZ Ding HL Ding WY Du ZZ Fan XL Fang J Gao CS Gao ML Gao SQ Gu JH Gu SD Gu WX Gu YF Guo YN Han SW Han Y He J He M Hu GY Hu T Hu XQ Huang DQ Huang T Huang YZ Jiang CH Jin S Jin Y Kang SH Ke ZJ Lai YF Lan HB Lang PF Li F Li J Li PQ Li Q Li RB Li W Li WD Li WG Li XH Li XN Lin SZ Liu HM Liu J Liu JH Liu Q Liu RG Liu Y Liu ZA Lu JG Luo SQ Luo Y Ma AM 《Physical review letters》1996,76(19):3502-3505
12.
Ablikim M Bai JZ Ban Y Cai X Chen HF Chen HS Chen HX Chen JC Chen J Chen YB Chu YP Dai YS Diao LY Deng ZY Dong QF Du SX Fang J Fang SS Fu CD Gao CS Gao YN Gu SD Gu YT Guo YN Guo ZJ Harris FA He KL He M Heng YK Hou J Hu HM Hu JH Hu T Huang XT Ji XB Jiang XS Jiang XY Jiao JB Jin DP Jin S Jin Y Lai YF Li G Li HB Li J Li RY Li SM Li WD Li WG Li XL Li XN Li XQ Liang YF Liao HB Liu BJ Liu CX Liu F Liu F Liu HH Liu HM Liu J Liu JB Liu JP Liu J Liu Q Liu RG Liu ZA Lou YC Lu F Lu GR Lu JG Luo CL Ma FC 《Physical review letters》2008,100(19):192001
Using psi(2S) --> pi(+)pi(-) J/psi events in a sample of 14.0 x 10(6) psi(2S) decays collected with the BES-II detector, a search for the decay of the J/psi to invisible final states is performed. No signal is found, and an upper limit at the 90% confidence level is determined to be 1.2 x 10(-2) for the ratio B(J/psi --> invisible)/B(J/psi-->mu(+)mu(-)). This is the first search for J/psi decays to invisible final states. 相似文献
13.
14.
15.
《Physics letters. [Part B]》1986,175(2):223-226
The calculation is presented of the αS correction to heavy quarkonium decay into scalar and pseudoscalar plus gamma. For the scalar case, the result agrees with the value previously calculated by Vysotsky. In both cases the correction brings about a substantial reduction in the rate. 相似文献
16.
R. U. Khafizov N. Severijns O. Zimmer H. -F. Wirth D. Rich S. V. Tolokonnikov V. A. Solovei M. R. Kolhidashvili 《JETP Letters》2006,83(1):5-9
The aim of this work is the experimental observation of and research into a rare neutron mode, the radiative beta decay, where
a new particle, the radiative gamma quantum, is formed along with the expected decay products: a beta electron, a recoil proton,
and an antineutrino. The discovery of this rare neutron decay mode was conducted through identification of triple-coincidence
events: simultaneous registration of a beta electron, a proton, and a radiative gamma quantum. The ordinary neutron decay
was registered by double coincidences of a beta electron and a recoil proton. The statistics collected allow one to deduce
the branching ratio (BR) BR = (3.2 ± 1.6) × 10−3 (90% C.L.) in the gamma energy region greater than 35 keV. This value of BR is consistent with standard electroweak theory.
The text was submitted by the authors in English.
An erratum to this article is available at . 相似文献
17.
18.
Recent measurements by the Belle Collaboration of the exclusive production of two charmonia in e(+)e(-) annihilation differ substantially from theoretical predictions. We suggest that a significant part of the discrepancy can be explained by the process e(+)e(-)-->J/psi+J/psi. Because the J/psi+J/psi production process can proceed through fragmentation of two virtual photons into two cc pairs, its cross section may be larger than that for J/psi+eta(c) by about a factor of 3.7, in spite of a suppression factor alpha(2)/alpha(2)(s) that is associated with the QED and QCD coupling constants. 相似文献
19.