共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 93 毫秒
1.
Let &PHgr; n (z) = ∑ ϕ (n) m=0 a (m, n) z m be the n th cyclonomic polynomial and set A(n) = max 0≤m≤ϕ(n) |a=(m, n)|. In previous papers the author has shown that for almost all integers A(n)≤ n &PHgr;(n) ; whenever lim n→∞ &PHgr;(n) = ∞ . In this paper we show that for most integers n with at least C log log n prime factors ( C > 2/log 2) this inequality is wrong. 相似文献
2.
设Ω={f(z):f(z)在|z|<1内解析,f(z)=z+∑^{+∞}_{n=2}{a_n z^n}, a_n是实数,∑^{+∞}_{n=2}{n|a_n|≤1}}.该文找出了函数族Ω的极值点与支撑点.
相似文献
3.
设{Xn, n ≥1}是独立同分布随机变量序列, Un 是以对称函数(x, y) 为核函数的U -统计量. 记Un =2/n(n-1)∑1≤i h(Xi, Xj), h1(x) =Eh(x, X2). 在一定条件下, 建立了∑n=2∞(logn)δ-1EUn2I {I U n |≥n 1/2√lognε}及∑n=3∞(loglognε)δ-1/logn EUn2 I {|U n|≥n1/2√log lognε} 的精确收敛速度. 相似文献
4.
In 1970, J.B. Kelly proved that $$\begin{array}{ll}0 \leq \sum\limits_{k=1}^n (-1)^{k+1} (n-k+1)|\sin(kx)| \quad{(n \in \mathbf{N}; \, x \in \mathbf{R})}.\end{array}$$ We generalize and complement this inequality. Moreover, we present sharp upper and lower bounds for the related sums $$\begin{array}{ll} & \sum\limits_{k=1}^{n} (-1)^{k+1}(n-k+1) | \cos(kx) | \quad {\rm and}\\ & \quad{\sum\limits_{k=1}^{n} (-1)^{k+1}(n-k+1)\bigl( | \sin(kx) | + | \cos(kx)| \bigr)}.\end{array}$$ 相似文献
5.
O. M. Fomenko 《Journal of Mathematical Sciences》1987,38(4):2148-2157
Let F(Z) be a cusp form of integral weight k relative to the Siegel modular group Spn(Z) and let f(N) be its Fourier coefficient with index N. Making use of Rankin's convolution, one proves the estimate (1) $$f(\mathcal{N}) = O(\left| \mathcal{N} \right|^{\tfrac{k}{2} - \tfrac{1}{2}\delta (n)} ),$$ where $$\delta (n) = \frac{{n + 1}}{{\left( {n + 1} \right)\left( {2n + \tfrac{{1 + ( - 1)^n }}{2}} \right) + 1}}.$$ Previously, for n ≥ 2 one has known Raghavan's estimate $$f(\mathcal{N}) = O(\left| \mathcal{N} \right|^{\tfrac{k}{2}} )$$ In the case n=2, Kitaoka has obtained a result, sharper than (1), namely: (2) $$f(\mathcal{N}) = O(\left| \mathcal{N} \right|^{\tfrac{k}{2} - \tfrac{1}{4} + \varepsilon } ).$$ At the end of the paper one investigates specially the case n=2. It is shown that in some cases the result (2) can be improved to, apparently, unimprovable estimates if one assumes some analogues of the Petersson conjecture. These results lead to a conjecture regarding the optimal estimates of f(N), n=2. 相似文献
6.
《复变函数与椭圆型方程》2012,57(5):397-415
Let F be an entire function represented by a (generalized) Dirichlet series where the coefficients { d n } and exponents { n } ( n = 1, 2, …) are sequences of complex numbers. We introduce a modified (R)-order 𝜌 and modified (R)-type σ and we obtain an estimate for | d n | when n is sufficiently large in terms of 𝜌 , σ and n . Other estimates relating 𝜌 and σ to { n } and { d n } are also obtained. 相似文献
7.
Paulo R. Holvorcem 《Aequationes Mathematicae》1993,45(1):62-69
Summary The Poisson summation formula is employed to find the Laurent expansions of the Dirichlet seriesF(s, c) =
n = 0
exp[–(n + c)1/2
s] andG(s, c) =
n = 0
(–1)
n
exp[–(n + c)1/2
s] (0c<1) abouts = 0. The Laurent expansions ofF(s, c) andG(s, c) are convergent respectively for 0 < |s| < and |s| < , and define the analytic continuation of the Dirichlet series to the half-plane Res < 0. 相似文献
8.
B. S. Kashin 《Mathematical Notes》1972,11(5):294-299
The question of the convergence of functional series everywhere in the segment [0, 1] is considered. Let F=f be the set of such functions in [0, 1] for each of which there is a transposition of the series
k=1
fk(x), which converges to it everywhere in [0, 1]. An example of a series is constructed such that the set F consists just of an identical zero, but
k=1
|f
k
(x
0)ü=,(x0 [0,1]) for any point of the segment [0, 1].Translated from Matematicheskie Zametki, Vol. 11, No. 5, pp. 481–490, May, 1972. 相似文献
9.
Yao Biyun 《数学年刊B辑(英文版)》1982,3(1):85-88
Let $\sigma$ denote the family of univalent functions
$\[F(z) = z + \sum\limits_{n = 1}^\infty {\frac{{{b_n}}}{{{z^n}}}} \]$
in l< |z| <\infty if G(w) is the inverse of a function $F(z) \in \sigma ^'$, the expansion of G(w) in some neighborhood of w=\infty is
$\[G(w) = w - \sum\limits_{n = 1}^\infty {\frac{{{B_n}}}{{{w^n}}}} \]$
It is well known that |B_1|\leq 1 for any F(z) \in \sigma ^'. Springer^[1] proved that | B_3| \leq 1 and conjectured that
$\[|{B_{2n - 1}}| \le \frac{{(2n - 2)!}}{{n!(n - 1)!}}{\rm{ }}(n = 3,4, \cdots )\]$ (1)
Kubota^[2] proved (1) for n=3, 4, 5. Schober^[3] proved (1) for n = 6, 7. Ren Fuyao[4,5] has verified (1) for n=6, 7, 8. In this article we are going to verify (1) for n=9. 相似文献
10.
For the Dirichlet series F(s) = ?n = 1¥ anexp{ sln } F(s) = \sum\nolimits_{n = 1}^\infty {{a_n}\exp \left\{ {s{\lambda_n}} \right\}} with abscissa of absolute convergence σ
a
=0, we establish conditions for (λ
n
) and (a
n
) under which lnM( s, F ) = TR( 1 + o(1) )exp{ rR