Bis(tetra‐n‐butylammonium) bis(μ‐1,2‐dicyanoethene‐1,2‐dithiolato‐κ3S,S′:S′)bis[(1,2‐dicyanoethene‐1,2‐dithiolato‐κ2S,S′)cobalt(III)]

In the title compound, (C₁₆H₃₆N)₂[Co(C₄N₂S₂)₂]₂, pairs of [Co(C₄N₂S₂)₂]^? anions combine to form discrete crystallographically centrosymmetric dimers, which stack along the c axis, surrounded by the counter‐cations. The metal atom in the anion has a five‐coordinate distorted square‐pyramidal geometry.     

A variable‐temperature study of 1,2‐bis(dimethylamino)‐1,2‐bis(2,6‐dimethylanilino)diborane

The title compound, C₂₀H₃₂B₂N₄, is monoclinic at ambient temperature but triclinic (pseudo‐monoclinic) below 150 K. The structures of the two phases, determined at 200 and 120 K, respectively, are very similar, the molecular symmetry being crystallographic C₂ and approximate (local) C₂, respectively. There is significant π conjugation within each N—B—N moiety, but none between them or between the N—B—N and arene moieties.     

Poly[aqua(μ3‐benzene‐1,2‐dicarboxylato)bis(μ3‐hydroxido)bis(μ2‐isonicotinato)dierbium(III) monohydrate] and the thulium analogue

The two isomorphous lanthanide coordination polymers, {[Ln₂(C₆H₄NO₂)₂(C₈H₄O₄)(OH)₂(H₂O)]·H₂O}_n (Ln = Er and Tm), contain two crystallographically independent Ln ions which are both eight‐coordinated by O atoms, but with quite different coordination environments. In both crystal structures, adjacent Ln atoms are bridged by μ₃‐OH groups and carboxylate groups of isonicotinate and benzene‐1,2‐dicarboxylate ligands, forming infinite chains in which the Er...Er and Tm...Tm distances are in the ranges 3.622 (3)–3.894 (4) and 3.599 (7)–3.873 (1) Å, respectively. Adjacent chains are further connected through hydrogen bonds and π–π interactions into a three‐dimensional supramolecular framework.     

Bis(tetraphenylphosphonium) bis[cis‐1,2‐bis(methoxycarbonyl)ethylenedithiolato‐κ2S,S′]nickelate(II) and bis(tetraphenylphosphonium) bis[cis‐1,2‐bis(methoxycarbonyl)ethylenedithiolato‐κ2S,S′]nickelate(III) iodide

The crystal structures of the title compounds, (C₂₄H₂₀P)₂[Ni(C₆H₆O₄S₂)₂], (I), and (C₂₄H₂₀P)₂[Ni(C₆H₆O₄S₂)₂]I, (II), in the diamagnetic reduced (2–) and paramagnetic oxidized (1–) states, are reported at 200 and 293 K, respectively. In both compounds, the Ni atom lies on an inversion centre and the NiS₄ coordination is thus required to be exactly planar. In the diamagnetic complex, (I), the Ni—S distances are 2.1818 (7) and 2.1805 (6) Å, while they are 2.1481 (6) and 2.1392 (5) Å in the paramagnetic complex, (II). This results from both the different complex core oxidation states and the different conformations of the methoxycarbonyl groups.     

The synthesis of n‐substituted isothiazol‐3(2h)‐ones from nsubstituted 3‐benzoylpropionamides

N‐Substituted isothiazol‐3(2H)‐ones can be easily prepared from N‐substituted 3‐benzoylpropi‐onamides in two experimentally simple steps, in satisfactory overall yields. Reaction of the amides with excess thionyl chloride results in the formation of N‐substituted 5‐benzoylisothiazol‐3(2H)‐ones, which are readily debenzoylated with alkali to the corresponding N‐substituted isothiazol‐3(2H)‐ones. This method has now been successfully applied to the synthesis of isothiazolones N‐substituted with a bulky alkyl group, such as the tert‐butyl group, and with a phenyl group bearing either a strong electron‐withdrawing substituent, such as the 3‐nitrophenyl and 4‐nitrophenyl group, or an electron‐releasing substituent, such as the 4‐methylphenyl and 4‐methoxyphenyl group.     

A facile stereoselective synthesis of (E)‐1,2‐disubstituted vinylic selenides via hydromagnesiation of alkylarylacetylenes

Hydromagnesiation of alkylarylacetylenes 1 in diethyl ether gave (E)‐α‐arylvinyl Grignard reagents 2 , which reacted with arylselenenyl bromides 3 in THF to afford stereoselectively (E)‐1,2‐disubstituted vinylic selenides 4 in good yields. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Heteroatom Chem 16:65–68, 2005; Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI 10.1002/hc.20066     

Controllability of radical copolymerization of maleimide and ethyl α‐(n‐propyl)acrylate using 1,1,2,2‐tetraphenyl‐1,2‐bis(trimethylsilyloxy) ethane as initiator

The radical copolymerization of maleimide (MI) and ethyl α‐propylacrylate was performed using 1,1,2,2‐tetraphenyl‐1,2‐bis(trimethylsilyloxy) ethane (TPSE) as initiator. The whole copolymerization process might be divided into two stages: in the first stage, the copolymerization was carried out on the common radical mechanism, the molecular weight of the copolymer increased rapidly in much lower conversion (< 85%), and did not depend on the polymerization time and conversion; in the second stage, molecular weight of the copolymer increased linearly with the conversion and the polymerization time. It was found, however, when the conversion was higher than a certain value, for example, more than 36%, the molecular weight of the copolymer was nearly unchangeable with the polymerization time and the molecular weight distribution was widened. The effect of reaction conditions on copolymerization was discussed and the reactivity ratios were calculated by the Kelen–Tudos method, the values were r_MI = 0.13 ± 0.03, r_EPA = 0.58 ± 0.06 for TPSE system and r_MI = 0.12 ± 0.03, r_EPA = 0.52 ± 0.06 for AIBN system. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci A: Polym Chem 38: 2872–2878, 2000     

Precision synthesis of regioregular poly(3‐hexylthiophene) with low dispersity using a zincate complex catalyzed by nickel with the ligand of 1,2‐bis(dicyclohexylphosphino)ethane

Regioregular poly(3‐hexylthiophene) (P3HT) has been a commonly used p‐type semiconducting material for solution processable organic electronics. To establish a living system of “Negishi‐type catalyst‐transfer polycondensation (NCTP)” using zincate complex as a synthetic method for well‐defined P3HT having predictable molecular weight (MW) and low dispersity (?), the ligands of Ni catalyst were optimized. As a result, a ligand of 1,2‐bis(dicyclohexylphosphino)ethane produced P3HTs with highly controlled number average MWs (1650–32,800) and very low ? values (1.03–1.17). The polymerization results were strongly influenced by steric hindrance based on the factors of cone angle and bite angle of Ni catalysts, and/or electron‐donating ability of phosphine ligands. In addition, we succeeded in the two‐stage polymerization of P3HT and the synthesis of P3HT‐b‐poly(3‐octadecylthiophene), the latter of which is the first demonstration by NCTP using zincate complex. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2014 , 52, 2287–2296     

On the short carbonyl bond in bis[μ‐1,2‐benzisothiazol‐3(2H)‐one 1,1‐dioxido‐κ2N:O]bis{[1,2‐benzisothiazol‐3(2H)‐one 1,1‐dioxido‐κN]bis(imidazole)copper(II)}

The short carbonyl bond in the title compound, [Cu₂(C₇H₄­NO₃S)₄(C₃H₄N₂)₄] [Liu, Huang, Li & Lin (1991). Acta Cryst. C 47 , 41–43], is an artifact of disorder in the iso­thia­zol‐3(2H)‐one 1,1‐dioxide part of the 1,2‐benziso­thia­zol‐3(2H)‐one entity. In the present redetermination, all bond dimensions in the centrosymmetric dinuclear mol­ecule are normal. The five‐coordinate Cu atom shows trigonal–bipyramidal coordination. Hydro­gen bonds from the imidazole donor ligand link adjacent mol­ecules into a two‐dimensional layer structure.     

Improved studies of cross‐coupling reactions of 5‐(tri‐n‐butystannyl)‐ and 5,5′‐bis(tri‐n‐butylstannyl)‐2,2′‐bithiophene with aryl halides

Stille coupling under standard conditions proceeds in low yield when using hindered organostannanes (1) or (2) and aryl bromide partners. The inclusion of aryl iodide instead of aryl bromide with the same organostannanes, significantly improves the efficiency of the coupling, providing a variety of desired products in good to excellent yield. The yields of Stille coupling are compared to the different reactivity of aryl halides. This study of Stille coupling with different aryl halides are documented and rationalized.     

2,2′‐(1,2‐Ethanediyldithio)bis(1,3‐benzothiazole)

In the title compound, C₁₆H₁₂N₂S₄, which is the result of the S‐alkyl­ation reaction of 2‐mercapto­benzo­thia­zole with ethyl­ene dibromide, the planes of the two benzo­thia­zole moieties form a dihedral angle of 3.84 (14)°. The bridging chain moiety, –SCH₂CH₂S–, adopts an antiperiplanar conformation. There are intermolecular S⃛S non‐bonded contacts of 3.6471 (9) Å, which stabilize the crystal packing.     

The reaction of di‐n‐butyltin oxide with hexafluoro‐2,2‐bis(4‐carboxyphenyl)propane

The reaction of hexafluoro‐2,2‐bis(4‐carboxyphenyl)propane with tetrabutyldipropoxydistannoxane, formed in situ from dibutyltin oxide and n‐propanol in benzene, yields a compound the structure of which is a strained macrocycle with a single dicarboxylate moiety. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

A Facile synthesis of n,n′‐oligomethylenebis(4,5‐dihydrofuran‐3‐carboxamide)s using manganese(III)‐based radical cyclization of n,n′‐oligomethylenebis(3‐oxobutanamide)s with 1,1‐diarylethenes

The reaction of N,N′‐oligomethylenebis(3‐oxobutanamide)s with 1,1‐diarylethenes in the presence of manganese(III) acetate in acetic acid at 100° produced N N′‐oligomethylenebis(2‐methyl‐5,5‐diaryl‐4,5‐dihydrofuran‐3‐carboxamide)s. Similarly, the reaction of 3‐oxobutanamidoethyl 3‐oxobutanoate or N,N′‐(3,6‐dioxaoctamethylene)bis(3‐oxobutanamide) with 1,1‐diphenylethene gave (2‐methyl‐5,5‐diphenyl‐4,5‐dihydrofuran‐3‐amido)ethyl 2‐methyl‐5,5‐diphenyl‐4,5‐dihydrofuran‐3‐carboxylate or N,N′‐(3,6‐dioxa‐octamethylene)bis(2‐methyl‐5,5‐diphenyl‐4,5‐dihydrofuran‐3‐carboxamide) in moderate yields.     

μ‐Oxo‐bis[(η5‐1,2‐dicarbaundecabor­ato)bis(N,N‐dimethylacetamidinato)tantalum] dichloromethane hemisolvate

The structure of the title compound, [Ta₂O(C₂B₉H₁₁)₂(C₄H₉­N₂)₄]·0.5CH₂Cl₂, contains two (C₂B₉H₁₁)Ta[NC(Me)NMe₂]₂ units bridged by a nearly linear [Ta—O—Ta 163.4 (4)°] μ‐oxo ligand. The dichloromethane molecule lies on a twofold axis.     

Bis[μ‐1,2‐bis(2‐pyridyl)ethyne‐κ2N:N′]bis[aquadinitratocadmium(II)]

Two twisted 1,2‐bis(2‐pyridyl)­ethyne ligands bridge two Cd²⁺ centers in the C₂‐symmetric title complex, [Cd₂(NO₃)₄(μ‐C₁₂H₈N₂)₂(H₂O)₂]. The bridging ligands arch across one another creating a `zigzag loop' molecular geometry. Two nitrate ions and a water mol­ecule complete the irregular seven‐coordinate Cd‐atom environment. The dihedral angles between the equivalent pyridyl ring planes of the two independent ligands are 67.2 (1)°. O_water—H⃛O_nitrate hydrogen bonding creates two‐dimensional layers parallel to the ab plane.     

Poly[bis(μ4‐benzene‐1,2‐dicarboxylato)di‐μ3‐isonicotinato‐dilanthanum(III)]

In the title compound, [La₂(C₈H₄O₄)₂(C₆H₄NO₂)₂]_n, there are two crystallographically independent La centres, both nine‐coordinated in tricapped trigonal prismatic coordination geometries by eight carboxylate O atoms and one pyridyl N atom. The La centres are linked by the carboxylate groups of isonicotinate (IN⁻) and benzene‐1,2‐dicarboxylate (BDC²⁻) ligands to form La–carboxylate chains, which are further expanded into a three‐dimensional framework with nanometre‐sized channels by La—N bonds. In the construction of the resultant architecture, in tricapped trigonal prismatic coordination geometries by eight carboxylate O atoms and one pyridyl N atom, while the BDC ligands link to four different cations each, displaying penta‐ and heptadentate chelating–bridging modes, respectively.     

The dinuclear copper(II) complexes di‐μ‐chlorido‐bis{[N,N′‐bis(4‐chlorobenzyl)propane‐1,2‐diamine]chloridocopper(II)} and di‐μ‐chlorido‐bis{[N,N′‐bis(3,4‐methylenedioxybenzyl)propane‐1,2‐diamine]chloridocopper(II)}

The two title dinuclear copper(II) complexes, [Cu₂Cl₄(C₁₇H₂₀Cl₂N₂)₂], (I), and [Cu₂Cl₄(C₁₉H₂₂N₂O₄)₂], (II), have similar coordination environments. In each complex, the asymmetric unit consists of one half‐molecule and the two copper centres are bridged by a pair of Cl atoms, resulting in complexes with centrosymmetric structures containing Cu(μ‐Cl)₂Cu parallelogram cores; the Cu...Cu separations and Cu—Cl—Cu angles are 3.4285 (8) Å and 83.36 (3)°, respectively, for (I), and 3.565 (2) Å and 84.39 (7)° for (II). Each Cu atom is five‐coordinated and the coordination geometry around the Cu atom is best described as a distorted square‐pyramid with a τ value of 0.155 (3) for (I) and 0.092 (7) for (II). The apical Cu—Cl bond length is 2.852 (1) Å for (I) and 2.971 (2) Å for (II). The basal Cu—Cl and Cu—N average bonds lengths are 2.2673 (9) and 2.030 (2) Å, respectively, for (I), and 2.280 (2) and 2.038 (6) Å for (II). The molecules of (I) are linked by one C—H...Cl hydrogen bond into a complex [10] sheet. The molecules of (II) are linked by one C—H...Cl and one N—H...O hydrogen bond into a complex [100] sheet.     

Reaktion von Bis(methylzink)‐1,2‐dipyridyl‐1,2‐bis(tert‐butyldimethylsilylamido)ethan mit Triisopropylsilylphosphan und ‐arsan

Reaction of Bis(methylzinc)‐1,2‐dipyridyl‐1,2‐bis(tert‐butyldimethylsilylamido)ethane with Triisopropylsilylphosphane and ‐arsane The reaction of bis(methylzinc)‐1,2‐dipyridyl‐1,2‐bis(tert‐butyldimethylsilylamido)ethane ( 1 ) with triisopropylsilylphosphane gives the three‐nuclear complex [1,2‐dipyridyl‐1,2‐bis(tert‐butyldimethylsilylamido)ethane]trizinc‐bis(μ‐triisopropylsilylphosphanediide) ( 2 ). Two zinc atoms show the coordination number of four whereas the third metal center is located between the two phosphorus atoms with a bent P–Zn–P‐moiety. The reaction of 1 with triisopropylsilylarsane proceeds analoguesly, however, we were not able to isolate analytically pure [1,2‐dipyridyl‐1,2‐bis(tert‐butyldimethylsilylamido)ethane]trizinc‐bis(μ‐triisopropylsilylarsanediide) ( 3 ).     

Bis[μ3‐1,8‐bis(triisopropylsilylamido)naphthalene]bis(tetrahydrofuran)di‐μ3‐oxido‐dimanganese(III)disodium

The solid‐state structure of the title compound, [Na₂Mn₂(C₃₂H₅₆N₂OSi₂)₂O₂] or [1,8‐C₁₀H₆(NSiⁱPr₃)₂Mn(μ₃‐O)Na(THF)]₂, which lies across a crystallographic twofold axis, exhibits a central [Mn₂O₂Na₂]⁴⁺ core, with two oxide groups, each triply bridging between the two Mn^III ions and an Na⁺ ion. Additional coordination is provided to each Mn^III centre by a 1,8‐C₁₀H₆(NSiⁱPr₃)₂ [1,8‐bis(triisopropylsilylamido)naphthalene] ligand and to the Na⁺ centres by a tetrahydrofuran molecule. The presence of an additional Na...H—C agostic interaction potentially contributes to the distortion around the bridging oxide group.