Oxindole Synthesis by Direct Coupling of C?H and C?H Centers

An sp ² /sp ³ get‐together : A novel and efficient method can be used to synthesize 3,3‐disubstitued oxindoles by the direct intramolecular oxidative coupling of an aryl C? H and a C? H center (see scheme; DMF=N,N‐dimethylformamide).

     

Catalytic C?C,C?N,and C?O Ullmann‐Type Coupling Reactions

Copper‐catalyzed Ullmann condensations are key reactions for the formation of carbon–heteroatom and carbon–carbon bonds in organic synthesis. These reactions can lead to structural moieties that are prevalent in building blocks of active molecules in the life sciences and in many material precursors. An increasing number of publications have appeared concerning Ullmann‐type intermolecular reactions for the coupling of aryl and vinyl halides with N, O, and C nucleophiles, and this Minireview highlights recent and major developments in this topic since 2004.     

Visible light-mediated photocatalyzed synthesis of oxazole via intermolecular C?N and C?O bond formation

An efficient visible light-mediated, eosin Y-catalyzed synthesis of oxazole has been developed from benzil with primary amines, that providing a straightforward, green, and environmentally benign access to a wide variety of substituted oxazole-2-amines under mild reaction conditions.     

Nitrene Insertion into C?C and C?H Bonds of Diamide Diimine Ligands Ligated to Chromium and Iron

The impact of redox non‐innocence (RNI) on chemical reactivity is a forefront theme in coordination chemistry. A diamide diimine ligand, [{‐CHN(1,2‐C₆H₄)NH(2,6‐iPr₂C₆H₃)}₂]ⁿ (n=0 to −4), (dadi)ⁿ, chelates Cr and Fe to give [(dadi)M] ([ 1 Cr(thf)] and [ 1 Fe]). Calculations show [ 1 Cr(thf)] (and [ 1 Cr]) to have a d⁴ Cr configuration antiferromagnetically coupled to (dadi)²⁻*, and [ 1 Fe] to be S=2. Treatment with RN₃ provides products where RN is formally inserted into the C C bond of the diimine or into a C H bond of the diimine. Calculations on the process support a mechanism in which a transient imide (imidyl) aziridinates the diimine, which subsequently ring opens.     

Amide‐Directed Tandem C?C/C?N Bond Formation through C?H Activation

The transformation of C? H bonds into other chemical bonds is of great significance in synthetic chemistry. C? H bond‐activation processes provide a straightforward and atom‐economic strategy for the construction of complex structures; as such, they have attracted widespread interest over the past decade. As a prevalent directing group in the field of C? H activation, the amide group not only offers excellent regiodirecting ability, but is also a potential C? N bond precursor. As a consequence, a variety of nitrogen‐containing heterocycles have been obtained by using these reactions. This Focus Review addresses the recent research into the amide‐directed tandem C? C/C? N bond‐formation process through C? H activation. The large body of research in this field over the past three years has established it as one of the most‐important topics in organic chemistry.     

Catalytic C?F Activation and Hydrodefluorination of Fluoroalkyl Groups

A powerful fluoride trap : The extremely Lewis acidic silyl cation [Et₃Si]⁺ is an active catalyst for the hydrodefluorination of fluoroalkyl groups at room temperature (see example). The carborane anion [CHB₁₁H₅Cl₆]^? plays an essential role in the catalytic cycle as a weakly coordinating anion that stabilizes cationic intermediates.

     

B?H,C?H,and B?C Bond Activation: The Role of Two Adjacent Agostic Interactions

Tuning the nature of the linker in a L∼BHR phosphinoborane compound led to the isolation of a ruthenium complex stabilized by two adjacent, δ‐C H and ε‐B_sp2 H, agostic interactions. Such a unique coordination mode stabilizes a 14‐electron “RuH₂P₂” fragment through connected σ‐bonds of different polarity, and affords selective B H, C H, and B C bond activation as illustrated by reactivity studies with H₂ and boranes.     

Bifunctional transition metal‐based molecular catalysts for asymmetric C?C and C?N bond formation

This paper describes the recent advances in the conceptually new bifunctional Ir and Ru catalysts for asymmetric catalytic reactions. These reactions include the enantioselective Michael addition of 1,3‐dicarbonyl compounds to cyclic enones and nitroalkenes, and the enantioselective direct amination of α‐cyanoacetates with diazoesters. The outcome of these reactions in terms of reactivity and selectivity was delicately influenced by the catalyst structures and the reaction conditions including the solvents used. Even with a 1 : 1 molar ratio of donors to acceptors, the reactions proceeded smoothly to give the corresponding chiral adducts with an excellent yield and enantiomeric excess (ee). Preliminary mechanistic studies showed that the key stage of the catalytic cycle is the interaction of the bifunctional catalyst with a pronucleophilic reagent that leads to stereoselective formation of C‐, O‐, or N‐bound complexes. The resulting protonated catalyst bearing metal‐bound nucleophiles readily reacts with electrophiles to provide C? C and C? N bond formation products in a highly stereoselective manner. © 2009 The Japan Chemical Journal Forum and Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Chem Rec 9: 106–123; 2009: Published online in Wiley InterScience ( www.interscience.wiley.com ) DOI 10.1002/tcr.20172     

Magnetic Anisotropy of the C?C Single Bond

Anisotropic effects are broadly used in NMR spectroscopy for structure elucidation. With the development of computational methods it has become possible to quantify the effects and obtain further insight into their origin. Some classical interpretations have been questioned. Herein, we show that the classical “anisotropy cone” representing the anisotropic effect of the C? C single bond should be revised: deshielding at its side and shielding along its end are observed. Consequently, methyl, methylene, and methyne hydrogen atoms are not deshielded by C? C bonds as is conventionally explained in NMR spectroscopy textbooks. They are just less shielded than by the C? H bonds attached at the same carbon. In addition, this anisotropic effect is dependent on the environment and care should be taken when drawing conclusions based on it. For example, it differs for the staggered and eclipsed conformations of ethane in HCCH planes, as well as for cyclohexane. In fact, it is not the anisotropy of the C2? C3/C5? C6 bonds that determines the chemical shift difference of axial and equatorial protons of a rigid cyclohexane ring, but magnetic contributions from all bonds.     

Alkyne Insertion into the M?P and M?H Bonds (M=Pd,Ni, Pt,and Rh): A Theoretical Mechanistic Study of the C?P and C?H Bond‐Formation Steps

In hydrogen‐metal‐phosphorus (H M P) transition metal complexes (proposed as intermediates of H P bond addition to alkynes in the catalytic hydrophosphorylation, hydrophosphinylation, and hydrophospination reactions), alkyne insertion into the metal‐hydrogen bond was found much more facile compared to alkyne insertion into the metal‐phosphorus bond. The conclusion was verified for different metals (Pd, Ni, Pt, and Rh), ligands, and phosphorus groups at various theory levels (B3LYP, B3PW91, BLYP, MP2, and ONIOM). The relative reactivity of the metal complexes in the reaction with alkynes was estimated and decreased in the order of Ni>Pd>Rh>Pt. A trend in relative reactivity was established for various types of phosphorus groups: PR₂>P(O)R₂>P(O)(OR)₂, which showed a decrease in rate upon increasing the number of the oxygen atoms attached to the phosphorus center.     

Practical and Highly Selective C?H Functionalization of Structurally Diverse Ethers

A trityl ion mediated C H functionalization of ethers with a wide range of nucleophiles at ambient temperature has been developed. The reaction displays high chemoselectivity and good functional group tolerance. The protocol also exhibits excellent regio‐ and diastereoselectivities for the unsymmetric ethers, thus stereoselectively generating highly functionalized disubstituted 2,5‐trans tetrahydrofurans (THF), 2,6‐trans tetrahydropyrans (THP), 2,6‐trans dihydropyrans (DHP), and 1,3‐trans isochromans, and highlighting the capacity of the protocol in complex molecule synthesis.     

Rhodium(III)‐Catalyzed C?C and C?O Coupling of Quinoline N‐Oxides with Alkynes: Combination of C?H Activation with O‐Atom Transfer

[Cp*Rh^III]‐catalyzed C H activation of arenes assisted by an oxidizing N O or N N directing group has allowed the construction of a number of hetercycles. In contrast, a polar N O bond is well‐known to undergo O‐atom transfer (OAT) to alkynes. Despite the liability of N O bonds in both C H activation and OAT, these two important areas evolved separately. In this report, [Cp*Rh^III] catalysts integrate both areas in an efficient redox‐neutral coupling of quinoline N‐oxides with alkynes to afford α‐(8‐quinolyl)acetophenones. In this process the N O bond acts as both a directing group for C H activation and as an O‐atom donor.