On the Electronic Structure of NiII Complexes That Feature Chelating Bisguanidine Ligands

In this work we report on the syntheses and properties of several new Ni complexes featuring the chelating bisguanidines bis(tetramethylguanidino)benzene (btmgb), bis(tetramethylguanidino)naphthalene (btmgn), and bis(tetramethylguanidino)biphenyl (btmgbp) as ligands. All complexes were structurally characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction and quantum chemical calculations. A detailed inspection of the magnetic susceptibility of [(btmgb)NiX₂] and [(btmgbp)NiX₂] (X=Cl, Br) revealed a linear temperature dependence of χ^?1(T) above 50 K, which was in agreement with a Curie–Weiss‐type behavior and a triplet ground state. Below approximately 25 K, however, magnetic susceptibility studies of the paramagnetic d⁸ Ni complexes revealed the presence of a significant zero‐field splitting (ZFS) that results from spin–orbit mixing of excited states into the triplet ground state. The electronic consequences that might arise from the mixing of states as well as from a possible non‐innocent behavior of the ligand have been explored by an experimental charge density study of [(btmgb)NiCl₂] at low temperatures (7 K). Here, the presence of ZFS was identified as one potential reason for the flat ?Cl‐Ni‐Cl deformation potential and the distinct differences between the ?X‐Ni‐X valence angles observed by experiment and predicted by DFT. An analysis of the topology of the experimentally and theoretically derived electron‐density distributions of [(btmgb)NiCl₂] confirmed the strong donor character of the bisguanidine ligand but clearly ruled out any significant non‐innocent ligand (NIL) behavior. Hence, [(btmgb)NiCl₂] provides an experimental reference system to study the mixing of certain excited states into the ground state unbiased from any competing NIL behavior.     

Square‐Planar Ruthenium(II) Complexes: Control of Spin State by Pincer Ligand Functionalization

Functionalization of the PNP pincer ligand backbone allows for a comparison of the dialkyl amido, vinyl alkyl amido, and divinyl amido ruthenium(II) pincer complex series [RuCl{N(CH₂CH₂PtBu₂)₂}], [RuCl{N(CHCHPtBu₂)(CH₂CH₂PtBu₂)}], and [RuCl{N(CHCHPtBu₂)₂}], in which the ruthenium(II) ions are in the extremely rare square‐planar coordination geometry. Whereas the dialkylamido complex adopts an electronic singlet (S=0) ground state and energetically low‐lying triplet (S=1) state, the vinyl alkyl amido and the divinyl amido complexes exhibit unusual triplet (S=1) ground states as confirmed by experimental and computational examination. However, essentially non‐magnetic ground states arise for the two intermediate‐spin complexes owing to unusually large zero‐field splitting (D>+200 cm^?1). The change in ground state electronic configuration is attributed to tailored pincer ligand‐to‐metal π‐donation within the PNP ligand series.     

Resonance Character of Copper/Silver/Gold Bonding in Small Molecule⋅⋅⋅MX (X=F,Cl, Br,CH3, CF3) Complexes

The resonance character of Cu/Ag/Au bonding is investigated in B???M?X (M=Cu, Ag, Au; X=F, Cl, Br, CH₃, CF₃; B=CO, H₂O, H₂S, C₂H₂, C₂H₄) complexes. The natural bond orbital/natural resonance theory results strongly support the general resonance‐type three‐center/four‐electron (3c/4e) picture of Cu/Ag/Au bonding, B:M?X?B⁺?M:X^?, which mainly arises from hyperconjugation interactions. On the basis of such resonance‐type bonding mechanisms, the ligand effects in the more strongly bound OC???M?X series are analyzed, and distinct competition between CO and the axial ligand X is observed. This competitive bonding picture directly explains why CO in OC???Au?CF₃ can be readily replaced by a number of other ligands. Additionally, conservation of the bond order indicates that the idealized relationship b_B???M+b_MX=1 should be suitably generalized for intermolecular bonding, especially if there is additional partial multiple bonding at one end of the 3c/4e hyperbonded triad.     

Zur Umsetzung von Kupfer(I)‐ und Kupfer(II)‐Salzen mit P(C6H4CH2NMe2‐2)3 ‐ die Festkörperstrukturen von {[P(C6H4CH2NMe2‐2)3]CuOClO3}ClO4, {[P(C6H4CH2NMe2‐2)3]Cu}ClO4, [P(C6H4CH2NMe2‐2)3]CuONO2 und [P(C6H4CH2NMe2‐2)2(C6H4CH2NMe2H+NO3‐‐2)]CuONO2

Reaction Behaviour of Copper(I) and Copper(II) Salts Towards P(C₆H₄CH₂NMe₂‐2)₃ ‐ the Solid‐State Structures of {[P(C₆H₄CH₂NMe₂‐2)₃]CuOClO₃}ClO₄, {[P(C₆H₄CH₂NMe₂‐2)₃]Cu}ClO₄, [P(C₆H₄CH₂NMe₂‐2)₃]CuONO₂ and [P(C₆H₄CH₂NMe₂‐2)₂(C₆H₄CH₂NMe₂H⁺NO₃^‐‐2)]CuONO₂ The reaction behaviour of P(C₆H₄CH₂NMe₂‐2)₃ ( 1 ) towards different copper(II) and copper(I) salts of the type CuX₂ ( 2a : X = BF₄, 2b : X = PF₆, 2c : X = ClO₄, 2d : X = NO₃, 2e : X = Cl, 2f : X = Br, 13 : X = O₂CMe) and CuX ( 5a : X = ClO₄, 5b : X = NO₃, 5c : X = Cl, 5d : X = Br) is discussed. Depending on X, the transition metal complexes [P(C₆H₄CH₂NMe₂‐2)₃Cu]X₂ ( 3a : X = BF₄, 3b : X = PF₆), {[P(C₆H₄CH₂NMe₂‐2)₃]CuX}X ( 4 : X = ClO₄, 11a : X = Cl, 11b : X = Br, 14 : X = O₂CMe), {[P(C₆H₄CH₂NMe₂‐2)₃]Cu}ClO₄ ( 6 ), [P(C₆H₄CH₂NMe₂‐2)₃]CuX ( 7a : X = Cl, 7b : X = Br, 10 : X = ONO₂), [P(C₆H₄CH₂NMe₂‐2)₂(C₆H₄CH₂NMe₂H⁺NO₃^‐‐2)]CuONO₂ ( 9 ) and [P(C₆H₄CH₂NMe₂‐2)₃]CuCl}CuCl₂ ( 12 ) are accessible. While in 3a , 3b and 6 the phosphane 1 preferentially acts as tetrapodale ligand, in all other species only the phosphorus atom and two of the three C₆H₄CH₂NMe₂ side‐arms are datively‐bound to the appropriate copper ion. In solution a dynamic behaviour of the latter species is observed. Due to the coordination ability of X in 3a , 3b and 6 non‐coordinating anions X^‐ are present. However, in 4 one of the two perchlorate ions forms a dative oxygen‐copper bond and the second perchlorate ion acts as counter ion to {[P(C₆H₄CH₂NMe₂‐2)₃]CuOClO₃}⁺. In 7 , 9 and 10 the fragments X (X = Cl, Br, ONO₂) form a σ‐bond with the copper(I) ion. The acetate moiety in 14 acts as chelating ligand as it could be shown by IR‐spectroscopic studies. All newly synthesised cationic and neutral copper(I) and copper(II) complexes are representing stable species. Redox processes are involved in the formation of 9 and 12 by reacting 1 with 2 . The solid‐state structures of 4 , 6 , 9 and 10 are reported. In the latter complexes the copper(II) ( 4 ) or copper(I) ion ( 6 , 9 , 10 ) possesses the coordination number 4. This is achieved by the formation of a phosphorus‐ and two nitrogen‐copper‐ ( 4 , 9 , 10 ) or three ( 6 ) nitrogen‐copper dative bonds and a coordinating ( 4 ) or σ‐binding ( 9 , 10 ) ligand X. In 6 all three nitrogen and the phosphorus atoms are coordinatively bound to copper, while X acts as non‐coordinating counter‐ion. Based on this, the respective copper ion occupies a distorted tetrahedral coordination sphere. While in 4 and 10 a free, neutral Me₂NCH₂ side‐arm is present, which rapidly exchanges in solution with the coordinatively‐bound Me₂NCH₂ fragments, this unit is protonated in 10 . NO₃^‐ acts as counter ion to the CH₂NMe₂H⁺ moiety. In all structural characterized complexes 6‐membered boat‐like CuPNC₃ cycles are present.     

Evidence for a Rapid Degenerate Hetero‐Cope‐Type Rearrangement in [Cp*W(S)2S‐CH2‐CHCH2]

Treatment of the salt [PPh₄]⁺[Cp*W(S)₃]^? ( 6 ) with allyl bromide gave the neutral complex [Cp*W(S)₂S‐CH₂‐CH?CH₂] ( 7 ). The product 7 was characterized by an X‐ray crystal structure analysis. Complex 7 features dynamic NMR spectra that indicate a rapid allyl automerization process. From the analysis of the temperature‐dependent NMR spectra a Gibbs activation energy of ΔG^≠ (278 K)≈13.7±0.1 kcal mol^?1 was obtained [ΔH^≠≈10.4±0.1 kcal mol^?1; ΔS^≠≈?11.4 cal mol^?1 K^?1]. The DFT calculation identified an energetically unfavorable four‐membered transition state of the “forbidden” reaction and a favorable six‐membered transition state of the “Cope‐type” allyl rearrangement process at this transition‐metal complex core.     

Syntheses,Structures and Magnetic Properties of Two Mixed‐Valent Disc‐like Hepta‐nuclear Compounds of [FeIIFeIII6(tea)6](ClO4)2 and [MnII3MnIII4(nmdea)6(N3)6]·CH3OH (tea = N(CH2CH2O)33−, nmdea = CH3N(CH2CH2O)22−)

Two mixed‐valent disc‐like hepta‐nuclear compounds of [Fe^IIFe^III₆(tea)₆](ClO₄)₂ ( 1Fe , tea = N(CH₂CH₂O)₃^3?) and [Mn^II₃Mn^III₄(nmdea)₆(N₃)₆]·CH₃OH ( 2Mn , nmdea = CH₃N(CH₂CH₂O)₂^2?) have been synthesized by the reaction of Fe(ClO₄)₂·6H₂O with triethanolamine (H₃tea) for the former and reaction of Mn(ClO₄)₂·6H₂O with diethanolamine (H₂nmdea) and NaN₃ for the later, respectively. 1Fe has the cationic cluster with a planar [Fe^IIFe^III₆] core consisting of one central Fe^II and six rim Fe^III atoms in hexagonal arrangement. The Fe ions are linked by the oxo‐bridges from the alcohol arms in the manner of edge‐sharing of their coordination octahedra. 2Mn is a neutral cluster with a [Mn^II₃Mn^III₄] core possessing one central Mn^II atom surrounded by six rim Mn ions, two Mn^II and four Mn^III. The structure is similar to 1Fe but involves six terminal azido ligands, each coordinate one rim Mn ion. 1Fe showed dominant antiferromagnetic interaction within the cluster and long‐range ordering at 2.7 K. The cluster probably has a ground state of low spin of S = 5/2 or 4/2. The long‐range ordering is weak ferromagnetic, showing small hysteresis with a remnant magnetization of 0.3 Nβ and a coercive field of 40 Oe. Moreover, the isofield of lines 1Fe are far from superposition, indicating the presence of significant zero–field splitting. Ferromagnetic interactions are dominant in 2Mn . An intermediate spin ground state 25/2 is observed at low field. In high field of 50 kOe, the energetically lowest state is given by the m_s = 31/2 component of the S = 31/2 multiplet due to the Zeeman effect. Despite of the large ground state, no single‐molecule magnet behavior was found above 2 K.     

Synthese und Kristallstruktur des heterobimetallischen Diorganozinndichlorids (FcN,N)2SnCl2 (FcN,N—: (η5‐C5H5)Fe{(η5‐C5H3[CH(CH3)N(CH3)CH2CH2NMe2]‐2}—)

Synthesis and Crystal Structure of the Heterobimetallic Diorganotindichloride (FcN, N)₂SnCl₂ (FcN, N^—: (η⁵‐C₅H₅)Fe{η⁵‐C₅H₃[CH(CH₃)N(CH₃)CH₂CH₂NMe₂]‐2}^—) The heterobimetallic title compound [(FcN, N)₂SnCl₂] ( 1 ) was obtained by the reaction of [LiFcN, N] with SnCl₄ in the molar ratio 1:1 in diethylether as a solvent. The two FcN, N^— ligands in 1 are bound to Sn through a C‐Sn σ‐bond; the amino N atoms of the side‐chain in FcN, N^— remain uncoordinated. The crystals contain monomeric molecules with a pseudo‐tetrahedral coordination at the Sn atom: Space group P2₁/c; Z = 4, lattice dimensions at —90 °C: a = 9.6425(2), b = 21.7974(6), c = 18.4365(4) Å, β = 100.809(2)°, R1_obs· = 0.051, wR2_obs· = 0.136.     

Syntheses and Spectroscopic Study of Some New N‐4‐Fluorobenzoyl Phosphoric Triamides; Crystal Structures of 4‐F‐C6H4C(O)N(H)P(O)R2, R = NH‐C(CH3)3, NH‐CH2C6H5, N(CH3)(CH2C6H5)

Some new N‐4‐Fluorobenzoyl phosphoric triamides with formula 4‐F‐C₆H₄C(O)N(H)P(O)X₂, X = NH‐C(CH₃)₃ ( 1 ), NH‐CH₂‐CH=CH₂ ( 2 ), NH‐CH₂C₆H₅ ( 3 ), N(CH₃)(C₆H₅) ( 4 ), NH‐CH(CH₃)(C₆H₅) ( 5 ) were synthesized and characterized by ¹H, ¹³C, ³¹P NMR, IR and Mass spectroscopy and elemental analysis. The structures of compounds 1 , 3 and 4 were investigated by X‐ray crystallography. The P=O and C=O bonds in these compounds are anti. Compounds 1 and 3 form one dimensional polymeric chain produced by intra‐ and intermolecular ‐P=O···H‐N‐ hydrogen bonds. Compound 4 forms only a centrosymmetric dimer in the crystalline lattice via two equal ‐P=O···H‐N‐ hydrogen bonds. ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectra show two series of signals for the two amine groups in compound 1 . This is also observed for the two α‐methylbenzylamine groups in 5 due to the presence of chiral carbon atom in molecule. ¹³C NMR spectrum of compound 4 shows that ²J(P,C_aliphatic) coupling constant for CH₂ group is greater than for CH₃ in agreement with our previous study. Mass spectra of compounds 1 ‐ 3 (containing 4‐F‐C₆H₄C(O)N(H)P(O) moiety) indicate the fragments of amidophosphoric acid and 4‐F‐C₆H₄CN⁺ that formed in a pseudo McLafferty rearrangement pathway. Also, the fragments of aliphatic amines have high intensity in mass spectra.     

Gas‐phase reactions of XH3+ (X = C,Si, Ge) with NF3: a comparative investigation on the detailed mechanistic aspects

The gas‐phase reaction of CH₃⁺ with NF₃ was investigated by ion trap mass spectrometry (ITMS). The observed products include NF₂⁺ and CH₂F⁺. Under the same experimental conditions, SiH₃⁺ reacts with NF₃ and forms up to six ionic products, namely (in order of decreasing efficiency) NF₂⁺, SiH₂F⁺, SiHF₂⁺, SiF⁺, SiHF⁺, and NHF⁺. The GeH₃⁺ cation is instead totally unreactive toward NF₃. The different reactivity of XH₃⁺ (X = C, Si, Ge) toward NF₃ has been rationalized by ab initio calculations performed at the MP2 and coupled cluster level of theory. In the reaction of both CH₃⁺ and SiH₃⁺, the kinetically relevant intermediate is the fluorine‐coordinated isomer H₃X‐F‐NF₂⁺ (X = C, Si). This species forms from the exoergic attack of XH₃⁺ to one of the F atoms of NF₃ and undergoes dissociation and isomerization processes which eventually result in the experimentally observed products. The nitrogen‐coordinated isomers H₃X‐NF₃⁺ (X = C, Si) were located as minimum‐energy structures but do not play an active role in the reaction mechanism. The inertness of GeH₃⁺ toward NF₃ is also explained by the endoergic character of the dissociation processes involving the H₃Ge‐F‐NF₂⁺ isomer. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Formation and hydrolysis of gas‐phase [UO2(R)]+: R═CH3, CH2CH3, CH═CH2, and C6H5

The goals of the present study were (a) to create positively charged organo‐uranyl complexes with general formula [UO₂(R)]⁺ (eg, R═CH₃ and CH₂CH₃) by decarboxylation of [UO₂(O₂C─R)]⁺ precursors and (b) to identify the pathways by which the complexes, if formed, dissociate by collisional activation or otherwise react when exposed to gas‐phase H₂O. Collision‐induced dissociation (CID) of both [UO₂(O₂C─CH₃)]⁺ and [UO₂(O₂C─CH₂CH₃)]⁺ causes H⁺ transfer and elimination of a ketene to leave [UO₂(OH)]⁺. However, CID of the alkoxides [UO₂(OCH₂CH₃)]⁺ and [UO₂(OCH₂CH₂CH₃)]⁺ produced [UO₂(CH₃)]⁺ and [UO₂(CH₂CH₃)]⁺, respectively. Isolation of [UO₂(CH₃)]⁺ and [UO₂(CH₂CH₃)]⁺ for reaction with H₂O caused formation of [UO₂(H₂O)]⁺ by elimination of ·CH₃ and ·CH₂CH₃: Hydrolysis was not observed. CID of the acrylate and benzoate versions of the complexes, [UO₂(O₂C─CH═CH₂)]⁺ and [UO₂(O₂C─C₆H₅)]⁺, caused decarboxylation to leave [UO₂(CH═CH₂)]⁺ and [UO₂(C₆H₅)]⁺, respectively. These organometallic species do react with H₂O to produce [UO₂(OH)]⁺, and loss of the respective radicals to leave [UO₂(H₂O)]⁺ was not detected. Density functional theory calculations suggest that formation of [UO₂(OH)]⁺, rather than the hydrated U^VO₂⁺, cation is energetically favored regardless of the precursor ion. However, for the [UO₂(CH₃)]⁺ and [UO₂(CH₂CH₃)]⁺ precursors, the transition state energy for proton transfer to generate [UO₂(OH)]⁺ and the associated neutral alkanes is higher than the path involving direct elimination of the organic neutral to form [UO₂(H₂O)]⁺. The situation is reversed for the [UO₂(CH═CH₂)]⁺ and [UO₂(C₆H₅)]⁺ precursors: The transition state for proton transfer is lower than the energy required for creation of [UO₂(H₂O)]⁺ by elimination of CH═CH₂ or C₆H₅ radical.     

Tetrakis(acetonitrile)‐dibromo‐nickel(II)‐di‐acetonitrile, [Ni(CH3CN)4Br2]·2CH3CN

[Tetrakis(acetonitrile)‐dibromo‐nickel(II)]‐di‐acetonitrile was obtained from a solution of nickel(II) dibromide in acetonitrile at 258 K. The crystal structure [monoclinic, P2₁/n (no.14), a = 1005.5(5), b = 831.3(5) , c = 1131.7(5) pm, β = 106.263(5)°, V = 908.1(8)·10⁶ pm³, Z = 2, R₁ for 1580 reflections with I₀>2σ(I₀): 0.0505] contains sixfold coordinated Ni^II atoms. Two trans coordinating bromide anions and four equatorial acetonitrile molecules form an elongated octahedron around the central Ni^II atom. [Ni(CH₃CN)₄Br₂] octahedra are connected via hydrogen bonds to neighboring octahedra as well as to solvate acetonitrile molecules.     

Schwingungsspektroskopische Untersuchungen an Trimethylphosphonium-Kationen (CH3)3PX+ (X = H,D) und Kristallstrukturen von (CH3)3PD+SbCl6− und (CH3)3PCl+SbCl6−

Vibrational Spectra of Trimethylphosphonium Cations (CH₃)₃PX⁺ (X = H, D) and Crystal Structures of (CH₃)₃PD⁺SbCl₆^? and (CH₃)₃PCl⁺SbCl₆^? The trimethylphosphonium salts (CH₃)₃PX⁺SbCl₆^? (X = H, D) and (CH₃)₃PH⁺MF₆^? (M = As, Sb) are prepared and characterized by vibrational and NMR spectroscopy (¹H, ³¹P, ¹³C). In addition the crystal structures of (CH₃)₃PD⁺SbCl₆^? and (CH₃)₃PCl⁺SbCl₆^? are reported. (CH₃)₃PD⁺SbCl₆^? crystallizes in the orthorhombic space group Pnma with a = 1555(1) pm, b = 753.1(8) pm, c = 1166(1) pm Z = 4. (CH₃)₃PCl⁺SbCl₆^? crystallizes triclinic in the space group P1 with a = 704.6(4) pm, b = 729.5(3) pm, c = 1391.1(7) pm, α = 89.57(4)°, b? = 88.04(4)°, γ = 74.98(4)° and Z = 2.     

Dimethylhydroxyoxosulfonium(VI) Hexafluoridometallates, [(CH3)2SO(OX)]+[MF6]–(X = H,D; M = As,Sb)

Dimethylsulfone reacts in the binary superacidic systems XF/MF₅ (X = H, D; M = As, Sb) under the formation of the corresponding salts of the type [(CH₃)₂SO(OX)]⁺[MF₆]^–. The salts are characterized by low temperature vibrational spectroscopy. In case of [(CH₃)₂SO(OH)]⁺[SbF₆]^– a single‐crystal X‐ray structure analysis is reported. The salt crystallizes in the orthorhombic space group Pbca with eight formula units per unit cell [a = 10.3281(3) Å, b = 12.2111(4) Å, c = 13.9593(4) Å]. The experimental results are discussed together with quantum chemical calculations on the PBE1PBE/6‐311G++(3pd,3df) level of theory.     

Synthesis and Structure of a One‐Dimensional Aluminum Phosphate, [NH3(CH2)2NH2(CH2)3NH3]3+ [Al(PO4)2]3—

A one‐dimensional aluminum phosphate, [NH₃(CH₂)₂NH₂(CH₂)₃NH₃]³⁺ [Al(PO₄)₂]^3—, has been synthesized hydrothermally in the presence of N‐(2‐Aminoethyl‐)1, 3‐diaminopropane (AEDAP) and its structure determined by single crystal X‐ray diffraction. Crystal data: space group = Pbca (no. 61), a = 16.850(2), b = 8.832(1), c = 17.688(4)Å, V = 2632.4(2)ų, Z = 8, R₁ = 0.0389 [5663 observed reflections with I > 2σ(I)]. The structure consists of anionic [Al(PO₄)₂]^3— chains built up from AlO₄ and PO₄ tetrahedra, in which all the AlO₄ vertices are shared and each PO₄ tetrahedron possesses two terminal P=O linkages. The cations, which balances the negative charge of the chains, are located in between the chains and interact with the oxygen atoms through strong N—H···O hydrogen bonds. Additional characterization of the compound by powder XRD and MAS‐NMR has also been performed and described.     

Theoretical investigations on structure, electrostatics potentials and vibrational frequencies of Li+ - CH3- O- (CH2- CH2- O)n- CH3 (n=3-7) conformers

Electronic structure, charge distributions and vibrational characteristics of CH₃ O(CH₂ CH₂ O) _n CH₃ (n=3-7) have been derived using the ab initio Hartree Fock and density functional calculations. For tri- to hexaglymes the lowest energy conformers have trans- conformation around the C-C and C-O bonds of the backbone. For heptaglyme (n=7 in the series), however, gauche-conformation around the C-C bonds renders more stability to the conformer and turns out to be 10.1 kJ mol ⁻¹ lower in energy relative to the conformer having trans-orientation around the C-C and C-O bonds. The molecular electrostatic potential topographical investigations reveal deeper minima for the ether oxygen in conformers having the gauche conformation around the C-C bonds over those for the trans- conformers. A change from trans- to gauche-conformation around the C-C bonds of the lowest energy conformer of heptaglyme engenders a triplet of intense bands ∼1,150 cm ⁻¹ in the vibrational spectra. Theoretical calculations predict that Li ⁺ binds strongly to the heptaglyme conformer in the above series. The frequency shifts in the vibrational spectra of CH₃O(CH₂CH₂O) _n CH₃- Li⁺ (n=3-7) conformers have been discussed     

Vergleich der Kristallstrukturen der Tetraammoniakate von Lithiumhalogeniden,LiBr·4NH3 und LiI·4NH3, mit der Struktur von Tetramethylammoniumiodid,N(CH3)4I

A Comparison of the Crystal Structures of the Tetraammoniates of Lithium Halides, LiBr·4NH₃ and LiI·4NH₃, with the Structure of Tetramethylammonium Iodide, N(CH₃)₄I Crystals of the tetraammoniates of LiBr and LiI sufficient in size for X‐ray structure determinations were obtained by slow evaporation of NH₃ at room temperature from a clear solution of the halides in liquid ammonia. The compounds crystallize in the space group Pnma (No. 62) with four formula units in the unit cell: LiBr·4NH₃: a = 11.947(5)Å, b = 7.047(4)Å, c = 9.472(3)Å LiI·4NH₃: a = 12.646(3)Å, b = 7.302 (1)Å, c = 9.790(2)Å For N(CH₃)₄I the structure was now successfully solved including the hydrogen positions of the methyl groups. N(CH₃)₄I: P4/nmm (No. 129), Z = 2, a = 7.948(1)Å, c = 5.738(1)Å The ammoniates of LiBr and LiI crystallize isotypic in a strongly distorted arrangement of the CsCl motif. Even N(CH₃)₄I has an CsCl‐like structure. Both structure types differ mainly in their orientation of the [Li(NH₃)₄]⁺ — resp. [N(CH₃)₄]⁺ — cations with respect to the surrounding “cube” of anions.     

A Novel Dinuclear Nickel(II) Complex with Three Bridges of Cl–, OAc– and (‐OCH2CH2O‐) Group of N,N, N′, N′‐Tetrakis(2‐benzimidazolyl methyl‐1, 4‐di‐ethylene amino) Glycol Ether

The novel dinuclear Ni²⁺ complex [Ni₂(μ‐Cl)(μ‐OAc) (EGTB)]·Cl·ClO₄·2CH₃OH, where EGTB is N, N, N′, N′‐tetrakis (2‐benzimidazolyl methyl‐1, 4‐di‐ethylene amino)glycol ether, crystallizes in the orthorhombic space group Pnma with a = 15.272(2), b = 14.768(2), c = 22.486(3) Å, V = 5071.4(12) ų, Z = 4, D_calc = 1.414 g cm^?3, and is bridged by triply bridging agents of a chloride ion, an acetate and an intra‐ligand (‐OCH₂CH₂O‐) group. The nickel coordination geometry is that of a slightly distorted octahedron with a NiN₃O₂Cl arrangement of the ligand donor atoms. The Ni–Cl distance is 2.361(2) Å, and two Ni–O distances are 1.996(5) and 2.279(6) Å. The three Ni–N distances are 2.033(7), 2.060(6), and 2.166(6) Å with the Ni–N bond trans to an ether oxygen the shortest, the Ni–N bond trans to an acetate oxygen the middle and the Ni–N bond trans to Cl the longest.     

Crystal Structure of Ni(NH3)Cl2 and Ni(NH3)Br2

Ni(NH₃)Cl₂ and Ni(NH₃)Br₂ were prepared by the reaction of Ni(NH₃)₂X₂ with NiX₂ at 350 °C in a steel autoclave. The crystal structures were determined by X‐ray powder diffraction using synchrotron radiation and refined by Rietveld methods. Ni(NH₃)Cl₂ and Ni(NH₃)Br₂ are isotypic and crystallize in the space group I2/m with Z = 8 and for Ni(NH₃)Cl₂: a = 14.8976(3) Å, b = 3.56251(6) Å, c = 13.9229(3) Å, β = 106.301(1)°; Ni(NH₃)Br₂: a = 15.5764(1) Å, b = 3.74346(3) Å, c = 14.4224(1) Å, β = 105.894(1)°. The crystal structures are built up by two crystallographically distinct but chemically mostly equivalent polymeric octahedra double chains [NiX_3/3X_2/2(NH₃)] (X = Cl, Br) running along the short b‐axis. The octahedra NiX₅NH₃ share common edges therein. The crystal structures of the ammines Ni(NH₃)_mX₂ with m = 1, 2, 6 can be derived from that of the halides NiX₂ (X = Cl, Br) by successive fragmentation of its CdCl₂ like layers by NH₃.     

[{(CH3)3Si}3C–Li–C{Si(CH3)3}3][Li · 3(OC4H8)] und {(CH3)3Si}3C–Li · O=C(Si(CH3)3)2, zwei neue Addukte des Lithium‐trisylmethanids

[{(CH₃)₃Si}₃C–Li–C{Si(CH₃)₃}₃][Li · 3(OC₄H₈)] and {(CH₃)₃Si}₃C–Li · O=C(Si(CH₃)₃)₂, two New Adducts of Lithium Trisylmethanide Sublimation of (Tsi–Li) · 2 THF (Tsi = –C(Si(CH₃)₃)₃) at 180 °C and 10^–4 hPa gives (Tsi–Li) · 1.5 THF in very low yield. The X‐ray structure determination shows an almost linear [Tsi–Li–Tsi]^– anion connected by short agostic Li…C contacts with the threefold THF‐coordinated Li‐cation. Base‐free Tsi–Li, solved in toluene is decomposed by oxygen, forming the strawberry‐colored ketone O=C(SiMe₃)₂, which forms an 1 : 1 adduct with undecomposed Tsi–Li. The X‐ray structure elucidation of this compound is also discussed.