Oligonucleotide Analogues with Integrated Bases and Backbone. Part 17

The formation of cyclic duplexes (pairing) of known oxymethylene‐linked self‐complementary U*[o]A⁽*⁾ dinucleosides contrasts with the absence of pairing of the ethylene‐linked U*[c_a]A⁽*⁾ analogues. The origin of this difference, and the expected association of U*[x]A⁽*⁾ and A*[x]U⁽*⁾ dinucleosides with x=CH₂, O, or S was analysed. According to this analysis, pairing occurs via constitutionally isomeric Watson–Crick, reverse Watson–Crick, Hoogsteen, or reverse Hoogsteen H‐bonded linear duplexes. Each one of them may give rise to three diastereoisomeric cyclic duplexes, and each one of them can adopt three main conformations. The relative stability of all conformers with x=CH₂, O, or S were analysed. U*[x]A⁽*⁾ dinucleosides with x=CH₂ do not form stable cyclic duplexes, dinucleosides with x=O may form cyclic duplexes with a gg‐conformation about the C(4′)? C(5′) bond, and dinucleosides with x=S may form cyclic duplexes with a gt‐conformation about this bond. The temperature dependence of the chemical shift of H? N(3) of the self‐complementary, oxymethylene‐linked U*[o]A⁽*⁾ dinucleosides 1 – 6 in CDCl₃ in the concentration range of 0.4–50 mM evidences equilibria between the monoplex, mainly linear duplexes, and higher associates for 3 , between the monoplex and cyclic duplexes for 6 , and between the monoplex, linear, and cyclic duplexes as well as higher associates for 1, 2, 4 , and 5 . The self‐complementary, thiomethylene‐linked U*[s]A⁽*⁾ dinucleosides 27 – 32 and the sequence isomeric A*[s]U⁽*⁾ analogues 33 – 38 were prepared by S‐alkylation of the 6‐(mesyloxymethyl)uridine 12 and the 8‐(bromomethyl)adenosine 22 . The required thiolates were prepared in situ from the C(5′)‐acetylthio derivatives 9, 15, 19 , and 25 . The association in CHCl₃ of the thiomethylene‐linked dinucleoside analogues was studied by ¹H‐NMR and CD spectroscopy, and by vapour‐pressure osmometric determination of the apparent molecular mass. The U*[s]A⁽*⁾ alcohols 28, 30 , and 31 form cyclic duplexes connected by Watson–Crick H‐bonds, while the fully protected dimers 27 and 29 form mainly linear duplexes and higher associates. The diol 32 forms mainly cyclic duplexes in solution and corrugated ribbons in the solid state. The nucleobases of crystalline 32 form reverse Hoogsteen H‐bonds, and the resulting ribbons are cross‐linked by H‐bonds between HOCH₂? C(8/I) and N(3/I). Among the A*[s]U⁽*⁾ dimers, only the C(8/I)‐hydroxymethylated 37 forms (mainly) a cyclic duplex, characterized by reverse Hoogsteen base pairing. The dimers 34 – 36 form mainly linear duplexes and higher associates. Dimers 34 and particularly 38 gelate CHCl₃. Temperature‐dependent CD spectra of 28, 30, 31 , and 37 evidence π‐stacking in the cyclic duplexes. Base stacking in the particularly strongly associating diol 32 in CHCl₃ solution is evidenced by a melting temperature of ca. 2°.     

Oligonucleotide Analogues with Integrated Bases and Backbone. Part 16

The self‐complementary, ethylene‐linked U*[c_a]A⁽*⁾ dinucleotide analogues 8, 10, 12, 14, 16 , and 18 , and the sequence‐isomeric A*[c_a]U⁽*⁾ analogues 20, 22, 24, 26, 28 , and 30 were obtained by Pd/C‐catalyzed hydrogenation of the corresponding, known ethynylene‐linked dimers. The association of the ethylene‐linked dimers was investigated by NMR and CD spectroscopy. The U*[c_a]A⁽*⁾ dimers form linear duplexes and higher associates (K between 29 and 114M ^?1). The A*[c_a]U⁽*⁾ dimers, while associating more strongly (K between 88 and 345M ^?1), lead mostly to linear duplexes and higher associates; they form only minor amounts of cyclic duplexes. The enthalpy–entropy compensation characterizing the association of the U*[c_x]A⁽*⁾ and A*[c_x]U⁽*⁾ dimers (x=y, e, and a) is discussed.     

Oligonucleotide Analogues with Integrated Bases and Backbone. Part 15

The self‐complementary (Z)‐configured U*[c_e]A⁽*⁾ dinucleotide analogues 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 , and 16 , and the A*[c_e]U⁽*⁾ dimers 19, 21, 23, 25, 27 , and 29 were prepared by partial hydrogenation of the corresponding ethynylene linked dimers. Photolysis of 14 led to the (E)‐alkene 17 . These dinucleotide analogues associate in CDCl₃ solution, as evidenced by NMR and CD spectroscopy. The thermodynamic parameters of the duplexation were determined by van't Hoff analysis. The (Z)‐configured U*[c_e]A⁽*⁾ dimers 14 and 16 form cyclic duplexes connected by Watson–Crick H‐bonds, the (E)‐configured U*[c_e]A dimer 17 forms linear duplexes, and the U*[c_e]A⁽*⁾ allyl alcohols 6, 8, 10 , and 12 form mixtures of linear and cyclic duplexes. The C(6/I)‐unsubstituted A*[c_e]U allyl alcohols 19 and 23 form linear duplexes, whereas the C(6/I)‐substituted A*[c_e]U* allyl alcohols 21 and 25 , and the C(5′/I)‐deoxy A*[c_e]U⁽*⁾ dimers 27 and 29 also form minor amounts of cyclic duplexes. The influence of intra‐ and intermolecular H‐bonding of the allyl alcohols and the influence of the base sequence upon the formation of cyclic duplexes are discussed.     

Oligonucleotide Analogues with Integrated Bases and Backbone. Part 22

The tritylated and silylated self‐complementary A*[s]U*[s]A*[s]U* and U*[s]A*[s]U*[s]A* tetramers 18 and 24 , linked by thiomethylene groups (abbreviated as [s]) between a nucleobase and C(5′) of the neighbouring nucleoside unit were prepared by a linear synthesis based on S‐alkylation of 5′‐thionucleosides by 6‐(chloromethyl)uridines, 7 or 10 , or 8‐(chloromethyl)adenosines, 12 or 15 . The tetramers 18 and 24 were detritylated to the monoalcohols 19 and 25 , and these were desilylated to the diols 20 and 26 , respectively. The association of the tetramers 18 – 21 and 24 – 26 in CDCl₃ or in CDCl₃/(D₆)DMSO 95 : 5 was investigated by the concentration dependence of the chemical shifts for H? N(3) or H₂N? C(6). The formation of cyclic duplexes connected by four base pairs is favoured by the presence of one and especially of two OH groups. The diol 20 with the AUAU sequence prefers reverse‐Hoogsteen, and diol 26 with the UAUA sequence Watson–Crick base pairing. The structure of the cyclic duplex of 26 in CDCl₃ at 2° was derived by a combination of AMBER* modeling and simulated annealing with NMR‐derived distance and torsion‐angle restraints resulting in a Watson–Crick base‐paired right‐handed antiparallel helix showing large roll angles, especially between the centre base pairs, leading to a bent helix axis.     

Oligonucleotide Analogues with Integrated Bases and Backbones. Part 26

The self‐complementary aminomethylene‐linked A*[n] U* dinucleosides 23 – 26 were prepared by reductive coupling of aldehyde 10 and azide 8 . The U*[n] A* sequence isomers 19 – 21 were similarly prepared from aldehyde 14 and azide 3 . The substituents at C(6/I) of 23 – 26 and at C(8/I) of 19 – 21 strongly favour the syn‐conformation. The A*[n] U* dinucleoside 23 associates more strongly than the sequence‐isomeric U*[n] A* dinucleoside 19 . The A*[n] U* dinucleosides 23 and 24 associate more strongly than the analogues devoid of the substituent at C(6/I), while the U*[n] A* dinucleoside 19 associates less strongly than the analogue devoid of the substituent at C(8/I). While 23 and 24 form cyclic duplexes mostly by Watson–Crick‐type base pairing, 25 only forms linear associates. The U*[n] A* dinucleoside 19 forms mostly linear duplexes and higher associates, and 21 forms cyclic duplexes showing both Watson–Crick‐ and Hoogsteen‐type base pairing. The cyclic duplexes of the aminomethylene‐linked dinucleosides show both the gg‐ and gt‐orientation of the linker, with the gg‐orientation being preferred.     

Oligonucleotide Analogues with Integrated Bases and Backbones. Part 24

Inspection of Maruzen models and force‐field calculations suggest that oligonucleotide analogues integrating backbone and bases (ONIBs) with an aminomethylene linker form similar cyclic duplexes as the analogous oxymethylene linked dinucleosides. The self‐complementary adenosine‐ and uridine‐derived aminomethylene‐linked A*[n ]U dinucleosides 15 – 17 were prepared by an aza‐Wittig reaction of the aldehyde 10 with an iminophosphorane derived from azide 6 . The sequence‐isomeric U*[n ]A dinucleosides 18 – 20 were similarly prepared from aldehyde 3 and azide 12 . The N‐ethylamine 5 , the acetamides 7 and 14 , and the amine 13 were prepared as references for the conformational analysis of the dinucleosides. In contradistinction to the results of calculations, the N‐ethylamine 5 exists as intramolecularly H‐bonded hydroxyimino tautomer. The association in CDCl₃ of these dinucleosides was studied by ¹H‐NMR and CD spectroscopy. The A*[n ]U dinucleosides 16 and 17 associate more strongly than the sequence isomers 19 and 20 ; the cyclic duplexes of 16 form preferentially Watson–Crick‐type base pairs, while 17, 19 , and 20 show both Watson–Crick‐ and Hoogsteen‐type base pairing. The cyclic duplexes of the aminomethylene‐linked dinucleosides prefer a gg‐orientation of the linker. No evidence was found for an intramolecular H‐bond of the aminomethylene group. The CD spectra of 16 and 17 show a strong, those of 19 a weak, and those of 20 almost no temperature dependence.     

Oligonucleotide Analogues with Integrated Bases and Backbones. Part 19.

The A*[s]U⁽*⁾ dinucleosides 1 and 2 form thermoreversible gels in organic solvents. The basis of the gelation is the formation of linear aggregates by base pairing following desolvation of the nucleobases. This is evidenced by the absence of gel formation by the C(6)‐deaminated analogue 3 of 1 , the correlation of gelation with the anti‐conformation, as preferred for 1 , and the temperature‐, concentration‐, and time‐dependent CD spectra. The gels were also characterized by the minimum gelation concentration, the gel–sol transition (melting) temperature, and rheological properties.     

Oligonucleotide Analogues with Integrated Bases and Backbones. Part 23

The sulfone 2 , and the sulfoxides (S)‐ 3 and (R)‐ 3 were obtained by oxidation of the thiomethylene‐linked A*[s ]U dinucleoside 1 . Conformational analysis and association studies of 2 , (S)‐ 3 , and (R)‐ 3 reveal a strong influence of the configuration on the conformation of the linking unit and on the self‐association of the dinucleosides.     

Oligonucleotide Analogues with Integrated Bases and Backbone. Part 30

The protected G*[s ]C*[s ]U*[s ]A*[s ]U*[s ]A*[s ]G*[s ]C* octanucleoside 24 was prepared by S‐alkylation of the thiolate derived from tetranucleoside 23 with the methanesulfonate 22 , and transformed to the silylated and isopropylidenated 25 , and further into the fully deprotected octanucleoside 26 . Compound 22 was derived from the methoxytrityl‐protected tetranucleoside 21 , and 21 was obtained by S‐alkylation of the thiolate derived from the dinucleoside 19 with methanesulfonate 17 derived from 16 by detritylation and mesylation. Similarly, tetranucleoside 23 resulted from S‐alkylation of the thiolate derived from 18 with the methanesulfonate 20 derived from 19 . Dinucleosides 16 and 18 resulted from S‐alkylation of the thiolate derived from the known cytidine‐derived thioacetate 15 with the C(8)‐substituted guanosine‐derived methanesulfonates 12 and 14 , respectively, that were synthesized from the protected precursors 4 and 7 by formylation, reduction, protection, and mesylation. The structures of the duplexes of 25 and 26 were calculated using AMBER* modelling and based on the known structure of the core tetranucleoside U*[s ]A*[s ]U*[s ]A*. The former shows a helix with a bent helix axis and strong buckle and propeller twists, whereas the latter is a regular, right‐handed, and apparently strain‐free helix. In agreement with modelling, the silylated and isopropylidenated octanucleoside 25 in (CDCl₂)₂ solution led to a mixture of associated species possessing at most four Watson? Crick base pairs, while the fully deprotected octanucleoside 26 in aqueous medium forms a duplex, as evidenced by a decreasing CD absorption upon increasing the temperature and by a UV‐melting curve with a melting temperature of ca. 10° below the one of the corresponding RNA octamer, indicating cooperativity between base pairing and base‐pair stacking.     

Oligonucleotide Analogues with Integrated Bases and Backbone (ONIB). Part 31

The self‐complementary guanosine‐ and cytidine‐derived aminomethylene‐linked C*[n ]G dinucleoside 9 was synthesized by reductive amination of aldehyde 3 with an iminophosphorane derived from azide 7 . Deacylation of 9 gave the isopropylidene‐protected dinucleoside 10 . The sequence‐isomeric G*[n ]C dinucleoside 11 was similarly prepared from aldehyde 8 and azide 5 , and deacylated to 12 . The association of 10 and 12 in CHCl₃ or in CHCl₃/DMSO mixtures, and the structure of the associates were studied by ¹H‐NMR, ESI‐MS, CD, and vapor pressure osmometry (VPO). Broad ¹H‐NMR signals of dinucleosides 10 and 12 evidence an equilibrium between duplexes and quadruplexes (Hoogsteen base pairing between the Watson? Crick base‐paired duplexes). The quadruplex dominates for the G*[n ]C dinucleoside 12 between ?50° and room temperature. The sequence‐isomeric C*[n ]G 10 forms mostly only a cyclic duplex in CDCl₃ and in CDCl₃/(D₆)DMSO 9 : 1.     

Oligonucleotide Analogues with Integrated Bases and Backbone. Part 13

The self‐complementary UA and AU dinucleotide analogues 41 – 45, 47, 48 , and 51 – 60 were prepared by Sonogashira coupling of 6‐iodouridines with C(5′)‐ethynylated adenosines and of 8‐iodoadenosines with C(5′)‐ethynylated uridines. The dinucleotide analogues associate in CDCl₃ solution. The C(6/I)‐unsubstituted AU dimers 51 and 54 prefer an anti‐oriented uracilyl group and form stretched linear duplexes. The UA propargyl alcohols 41 and 43 – 45 possess a persistent intramolecular O(5′/I)? H???N(3/I) H‐bond and, thus, a syn‐oriented adeninyl and a gt‐ or tg‐oriented ethynyl moiety; they form corrugated linear duplexes. All other dimers form cyclic duplexes characterized by syn‐oriented nucleobases. The preferred orientation of the ethynyl moiety (the C(4′),C(5′) torsion angle) defines a conformation between gg and one where the ethynyl group eclipses O(4′/I). The UA dimers 42, 47 , and 48 form Watson–Crick H‐bonds, the AU dimers 56 and 58 – 60 H‐bonds of the Watson–Crick‐type, the AU dimers 53 and 55 reverse‐Hoogsteen, and 57 Hoogsteen H‐bonds. The pairing mode depends on the substituent of C(5′/I) (H, OSiⁱPr₃; OH) and on the H‐bonds of HO? C(5′/I) in the AU dimers. Association constants were derived from the concentration‐dependent chemical shift for HN(3) of the uracilyl moiety; they vary from 45–104 M ^?1 for linear duplexes to 197–2307 M ^?1 for cyclic duplexes. The thermodynamic parameters were determined by van't Hoff analysis of the temperature‐dependence of the (concentration‐dependent) chemical shift for HN(3) of the uracilyl moiety. Neglecting stacking energies, one finds an average energy of 3.5–4.0 kcal/mol per intermolecular H‐bond. Base stacking is evidenced by the temperature‐dependent CD spectra. The crystal structure of 54 shows two antiparallel chains of dimers connected by Watson‐Crick H‐bonds. The chains are bridged by a strong H‐bond between the propargylic OH and O?C(4) and by weak reverse A ? A Hoogsteen H‐bonds.     

Cation‐Mediated Conversion of the State of Charge in Uranium Arene Inverted‐Sandwich Complexes

Two new arene inverted‐sandwich complexes of uranium supported by siloxide ancillary ligands [K{U(OSi(OtBu)₃)₃}₂(μ‐η⁶:η⁶‐C₇H₈)] ( 3 ) and [K₂{U(OSi(OtBu)₃)₃}₂(μ‐η⁶:η⁶‐C₇H₈)] ( 4 ) were synthesized by the reduction of the parent arene‐bridged complex [{U(OSi(OtBu)₃)₃}₂(μ‐η⁶:η⁶‐C₇H₈)] ( 2 ) with stoichiometric amounts of KC₈ yielding a rare family of inverted‐sandwich complexes in three states of charge. The structural data and computational studies of the electronic structure are in agreement with the presence of high‐valent uranium centers bridged by a reduced tetra‐anionic toluene with the best formulation being U^V–(arene^4?)–U^V, KU^IV–(arene^4?)–U^V, and K₂U^IV–(arene^4?)–U^IV for complexes 2 , 3 , and 4 respectively. The potassium cations in complexes 3 and 4 are coordinated to the siloxide ligands both in the solid state and in solution. The addition of KOTf (OTf=triflate) to the neutral compound 2 promotes its disproportionation to yield complexes 3 and 4 (depending on the stoichiometry) and the U^IV mononuclear complex [U(OSi(OtBu)₃)₃(OTf)(thf)₂] ( 5 ). This unprecedented reactivity demonstrates the key role of potassium for the stability of these complexes.     

The spread of unicyclic graphs with given size of maximum matchings

The spread s(G) of a graph G is defined as s(G) = max _i,j |λ _i − λ _j |, where the maximum is taken over all pairs of eigenvalues of G. Let U(n,k) denote the set of all unicyclic graphs on n vertices with a maximum matching of cardinality k, and U ^*(n,k) the set of triangle-free graphs in U(n,k). In this paper, we determine the graphs with the largest and second largest spectral radius in U ^*(n,k), and the graph with the largest spread in U(n,k).      

Protein–Nucleic acid interactions: Investigations on the peptide backbone interaction with polynucleotides

Model building, difference spectroscopy, and ¹H and ¹³C NMR experiments have been carried out to study the binding of poly(L -Ser) with the polyribonucleotides poly(A) and poly(U) at pH 7.1. Studies have also been carried out with base paired duplexes poly(A)?poly(U). Peak doubling of C^α and carbonyl resonances in the ¹³C NMR spectrum of poly(L -Ser) in presence of polyribonucleotides is observed. From the chemical shifts and the linewidth, it is concluded that the interaction occurs through hydrogen bonding between the nucleic acid bases and the peptide backbone. In case of poly(A) and poly(U) the hydrogen bonding scheme with peptide backbone is different from that in the base paired poly(A)?poly(U). The possible binding schemes of double stranded DNA and peptide backbone have been investigated using model building and potential energy calculations. The hydrogen bonding schemes discriminate between various base pairs and their sequence. It is concluded that protein backbone can play an important role in protein–nucleic acid recognition schemes.     

On unicyclic conjugated molecules with minimal energies

The energy of a graph is defined as the sum of the absolute values of all the eigenvalues of the graph. Let U(k) be the set of all unicyclic graphs with a perfect matching. Let C _g(G) be the unique cycle of G with length g(G), and M(G) be a perfect matching of G. Let U ⁰(k) be the subset of U(k) such that g(G)≡ 0 (mod 4), there are just g/2 independence edges of M(G) in C _g(G) and there are some edges of E(G)\ M(G) in G\ C _g(G) for any G∈U ⁰(k). In this paper, we discuss the graphs with minimal and second minimal energies in U ^*(k) = U(k)\ U ⁰(k), the graph with minimal energy in U ⁰(k), and propose a conjecture on the graph with minimal energy in U(k).      

Two bicyclic dinuclear complexes generated from 3,3′‐[1,3,4‐thiadiazole‐2,5‐diyldi(thiomethylene)]dibenzoic acid (L) and dimethylformamide (DMF): [Cu(L)(DMF)]2 and [Zn(L)(DMF)]2

A new 1,3,4‐thiadiazole bridging ligand, namely 3,3′‐[1,3,4‐thiadiazole‐2,5‐diyldi(thiomethylene)]dibenzoic acid (L), has been used to create the novel isomorphous complexes bis{μ‐3,3′‐[1,3,4‐thiadiazole‐2,5‐diyldi(thiomethylene)]dibenzoato}bis[(N,N‐dimethylformamide)copper(II)], [Cu₂(C₁₈H₁₂N₂O₄S₃)₂(C₃H₇NO)₂], (I), and bis{μ‐3,3′‐[1,3,4‐thiadiazole‐2,5‐diyldi(thiomethylene)]dibenzoato}bis[(N,N‐dimethylformamide)zinc(II)], [Zn₂(C₁₈H₁₂N₂O₄S₃)₂(C₃H₇NO)₂], (II). Both exist as centrosymmetric bicyclic dimers constructed through the syn–syn bidentate bridging mode of the carboxylate groups. The two rings share a metal–metal bond and each of the metal atoms possesses a square‐pyramidal geometry capped by the dimethylformamide molecule. The 1,3,4‐thiadiazole rings play a critical role in the formation of a π–π stacking system that expands the dimensionality of the structure from zero to one. The thermogravimetric analysis of (I) indicates decomposition of the coordinated ligands on heating. Compared with the fluorescence of L in the solid state, the fluorescence intensity of (II) is relatively enhanced with a slight redshift, while that of (I) is quenched.     

Expanding the Chemistry of Molecular U2+ Complexes: Synthesis,Characterization, and Reactivity of the {[C5H3(SiMe3)2]3U}− Anion

The synthesis of new molecular complexes of U²⁺ has been pursued to make comparisons in structure, physical properties, and reactivity with the first U²⁺ complex, [K(2.2.2‐cryptand)][Cp′₃U], 1 (Cp′=C₅H₄SiMe₃). Reduction of Cp′′₃U [Cp′′=C₅H₃(SiMe₃)₂] with KC₈ in the presence of 2.2.2‐cryptand or 18‐crown‐6 generates [K(2.2.2‐cryptand)][Cp′′₃U], 2‐K(crypt) , or [K(18‐crown‐6)(THF)₂][Cp′′₃U], 2‐K(18c6) , respectively. The UV/Vis spectra of 2‐K and 1 are similar, and they are much more intense than those of U³⁺ analogues. Variable temperature magnetic susceptibility data for 1 and 2‐K(crypt) reveal lower room temperature χ_MT values relative to the experimental values for the 5f³ U³⁺ precursors. Stability studies monitored by UV/Vis spectroscopy show that 2‐K(crypt) and 2‐K(18c6) have t_1/2 values of 20 and 15 h at room temperature, respectively, vs. 1.5 h for 1 . Complex 2‐K(18c6) reacts with H₂ or PhSiH₃ to form the uranium hydride, [K(18‐crown‐6)(THF)₂][Cp′′₃UH], 3 . Complexes 1 and 2‐K(18c6) both reduce cyclooctatetraene to form uranocene, (C₈H₈)₂U, as well as the U³⁺ byproducts [K(2.2.2‐cryptand)][Cp′₄U], 4 , and Cp′′₃U, respectively.     

Uranium-sulfilimine chemistry. The preparation of Cp2*UCl2(HNSPh2) and its hydrolysis with HNSPh2 · H2O

The reaction of Cp₂*UCl₂ with HNSPh₂ produces Cp₂*UCl₂(HNSPh₂), which is the first structurally characterized complex of a sulfilimine. The hydrolysis of Cp₂*UCl₂(HNSPh₂) with HNSPh₂ · H₂O yields a tetrauranium cluster whose heavy atom structure has been determined by x-ray diffraction and which is formulated as a U^IV/U^V complex: [Cp*(Cl)(HNSPh₂)U(μ₃-O)(μ₂-O)₂U(Cl)(HNSPh₂)₂]₂.     

Nickel(II)–Lanthanide(III) Magnetic Exchange Coupling Influencing Single‐Molecule Magnetic Features in {Ni2Ln2} Complexes

Four isostructural [Ni₂Ln₂(CH₃CO₂)₃(HL)₄(H₂O)₂]³⁺(Ln³⁺=Dy ( 1 ), Tb ( 2 ), Ho ( 3 ) or Lu ( 4 )) complexes and a dinuclear [NiGd(HL)₂(NO₃)₃] ( 5 ) complex are reported (where HL=2‐methoxy‐6‐[(E)‐2′‐hydroxymethyl‐phenyliminomethyl]‐phenolate). For compounds 1 – 3 and 5 , the Ni²⁺ ions are ferromagnetically coupled to the respective lanthanide ions. The ferromagnetic coupling in 1 suppresses the quantum tunnelling of magnetisation (QTM), resulting in a rare zero dc field Ni–Dy single‐molecule magnet, with an anisotropy barrier U_eff of 19 K.     

Interaction of AnVI with Isothiocyanate Ion in Water‐Organic Media (An = U,Np, Pu)

Behavior of U^VI, Np^VI and Pu^VI in water‐acetonitrile solutions was studied spectrophotometrically with the successive addition of the polar organic ligands (dimethyl sulfoxide or hexamethylphosphoric triamide) and the NCS^– ion. The detected spectral effects – changes in the absorption intensity, bathochromic shifts in the absorption bands, the absence of isosbestic points, a change in the color of the solution – indicate complex competitive processes occurring in the studied solutions. In the case of Np^VI, its partial reduction to Np^IV by NCS^– ion is observed. Solid U^VI complex, [UO₂(HMPA)₂(NCS)₂], was isolated, its crystal structure was determined using X‐ray diffraction. In contrast to known AnO₂²⁺ compounds with the NCS^– ion, this complex exhibits tetragonal bipyramidal environment of the U atom. [UO₂(HMPA)₂(NCS)₂] is also characterized by UV/Vis, IR and luminescence spectroscopy.