How to approach membership of IAF/ILAC Arrangements: the peer evaluation system of IAF and ILAC for single accreditation bodies

Peer evaluation is used by the international accreditation organisations IAF and ILAC as a tool to harmonise the results of accreditation of conformity assessment bodies and as a control mechanism to ensure constantly competent services according to harmonized standards. Upon positive evaluation outcome, the accreditation body may join an Arrangement (MLA/MRA) between accreditation bodies, confirming systematic reliability and competence to the market. The objective of these Arrangements is that they will cover all accreditation bodies in all countries in the world, thus eliminating the need for suppliers of products or services to be certified in each country where they sell their products or services. This article is to aid single accreditation bodies wishing to sign these Arrangements in the future, and, furthermore, to communicate the procedure and the relevance of evaluation to the public in order to build up confidence in such Arrangements.     

On the specific experience of national metrology institutes (NMIs) with national accreditation bodies (NABs)

The following paper addresses the experience of certain national metrology institutes (NMIs) with national accreditation bodies (NABs), in particular in small countries with emerging economies in new EU or candidate member states. Specific cases have been analysed primarily in some Central and South-East European countries. NABs under consideration are, in principle, members of European Co-operation for Accreditation (EA). EA cross-frontier policy in these cases will be discussed and resulting dilemmas outlined. Focus will be given to the problems of NMIs also performing calibrations, commercial calibration laboratories, and their relations with NABs. Due to numerous problems of smaller NABs, cross-frontier policy should stimulate cooperation between foreign and local accreditation bodies not only at the request of the calibration laboratory or some other conformity assessment body, but at the request of the local accreditation body in order to provide the best service for their local economy. As a solution to the accreditation problems, this paper proposes a process of gradual formation of a common European pool of experts, real-life common practices and, finally, maybe even some form of joint European accreditation service. The opinions expressed in the paper are personal statements of the author, and do not necessarily reflect the official opinions of the institutions of the author. Papers published in this section do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the Editors, the Editorial Board and the Publisher.     

The Japan Accreditation Board for Conformity Assessment – Introduction to the Japanese accreditation system

 The background to the establishment of the Japan Accreditation Board for Conformity Assessment (JAB) is reviewed in relation to the latest global developments in conformity assessment activities. JAB (known as the Japan Accreditation Board for Quality System Registration at the time of its establishment) was established in 1993 as the accreditation body for quality system registration, the focal point for conformity assessment in the private sector in Japan. The extension of the area of accreditation was made in June 1996, covering all conformity assessment activities including laboratory accreditation, which resulted in the amendment of the name of the body to the current one. Various elements of the laboratory accreditation program are introduced to give the overview of this new program. Received: 2 October 1996 Accepted: 5 December 1996     

The role of an independent laboratory association in the standards,metrology, quality assurance and accreditation environment

Whilst there can be no doubt as to the benefit that an independent 3rd party conformity assessment accreditation body plays in ensuring the competency of results, personnel and processes, it is often at the expense of an adversarial relationship with the laboratory community it serves. A significant improvement in this relationship can be obtained by the formation and active participation by an independent laboratory association. This paper describes such an organisation, how it was formed, what role and the functions it currently performs and, most importantly, how it interacts with the national accreditation body and the stakeholders who are its members.     

Developments in accreditation of flexible scopes in Europe

Accreditation of testing and calibration laboratories is the most frequently used type of accreditation. European Co-operation for Accreditation (EA) as the European network of recognised national accreditation bodies covers accreditation of all types of conformity assessment bodies. In Europe, the number of accredited testing and calibration laboratories covered under the EA Multilateral Agreement is about 15,000 nowadays.     

Development of laboratory accreditation in the United States

 Laboratory accreditation in the United States is an old profession. Users and regulators have, it seems, been concerned about the quality of test data they obtain from laboratories for well over half a century. These users have developed many different systems to meet their needs. As a result, there is much duplication of effort and overlapping in accreditation requirements and many laboratories have to maintain current accreditation from a number of organizations. A number of attempts have been made over the years to reduce this duplication, but it still remains. In the meantime, rapid progress has been made internationally to recognize laboratory accreditation systems in different countries. This paper describes this situation and speculates on the future, considering the international thrust to simplify and consolidate conformity assessment procedures. Received: 26 May 1998 · Accepted: 6 June 1998     

Conformity assessment and metrology: update on the state of affairs

A couple of years ago, ISO CASCO launched a major project of transforming all the existing ISO Guides on conformity assessment to a comprehensive series of ISO standards 17000 being now in various stages of development. As the concept of traceability underpinning all measurements has been a basic mission of metrology, a number of these standards have a direct bearing on metrology. The series is logically based on a definition standard, ISO 17000, giving, among others, a guidance which activities fall under conformity assessment. The fact that calibration does not, might have important consequences which must yet be assessed. A controversial discussion on some issues has been in progress concerning ISO 17011 on accreditation bodies which touches both on national metrology institutes (NMIs) with an accreditation function and on calibration labs at large. ISO 17040 on peer review could be used with an advantage to support mutual recognition arrangements among a limited number of bodies of a specialized expertise (e.g., CIPM MRA among NMIs under the Metre Convention). ISO 17025 has been the most important standard for the metrology community and has undergone a major overhaul taking on board the uncovered requirements from ISO 9001:2000. In general, the paper will give an update on the developments outlined above and discuss the consequences and further steps from the viewpoint of metrology.     

Accreditation of PT providers – is it worth the money?

This topic is being presented from two perspectives, namely the views of an accreditation body and those of an accredited provider of external quality assessment schemes. The first perspective, from an accreditation body, is based on the experience of Australia's national laboratory accreditation body (NATA), which has accredited fourteen proficiency testing (PT) providers and is currently processing an application from another. The second perspective is based on the experience of EQUALIS, the national quality assurance organisation for laboratory medicine in Sweden, which was granted accreditation in 2002.Presented at 5^th Eurachem Workshop on Proficiency testing in analytical chemistry, microbiology and laboratory medicine, Portorož (Slovenia) 25–27 Sept 2005     

The German accreditation system

 In response to the requirements of the "Global Approach" in Germany, a national accreditation system has been established based on traditional experiences in the recognition of the competence of laboratories and certification bodies. In 1991, the German Accreditation Council (DAR) was founded as a coordinating body supported by the Federal and State Ministries and German industry. In this way, it was possible to organise coordinated representation in international bodies, to offer a forum for cooperation between authorities and industry, and to provide for a structure subdivided into sectors which better fits the needs of the industrial sectors and gives them the necessary transparency and acceptance. The DAR itself does not carry out accreditations. This is done by the accreditation bodies represented in the DAR and specialised in for specific subjects, thereby having a close connection with expert groups of a high technical competence in their specific technical fields. At the end of this paper, the procedure for the assessment of the technical competence of a laboratory, an important part of the accreditation, is described.     

Flexibilization of the scope of accreditation: an important asset for food and water microbiology laboratories

Beltest, the Belgian accreditation body, has investigated flexibilization of the scope of accreditation for chemistry laboratories and food and water microbiology laboratories. This flexibilization, synonymous with test-type accreditation, allows a laboratory to add new test methods or retry previous test methods without having to undergo a new audit by Beltest. It has been used for nearly ten years by German and Swiss accreditation bodies. Flexibilization permits the validation of methods and results, given that the competence of the particular laboratory is already well established. This new concept in microbiology allows client’s needs to be adequately met, and facilitates the quick establishment of a method in several laboratories at once in case of a public health crisis. The first laboratory to participate at this investigation on the flexibilization concept, as a test of the concept, was the Belgian reference laboratory for food microbiology.     

Regional cooperation in proficiency testing: strategy planning and practical experiences in Western Balkan countries

The article describes the project of regional cooperation in proficiency testing within CARDS 2006 (assistance programme to the Western Balkans), which was coordinated by European Committee for Standardization, European Commission and European Free Trade Association and conducted by the University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Laboratory of Metrology and Quality. The later is the holder of the national standard for thermodynamic temperature as well as an accredited proficiency testing provider and also accredited as a calibration, testing and inspection laboratory. It is also responsible for graduate study programme Quality Engineering. Proficiency testing was considered as a core activity of the entire project, but additionally as a very appropriate platform for knowledge transfer of EU technical legislation in selected sectors, metrology, testing and quality assurance in general. The project had a high added value for participating laboratories in countries of Western Balkans, because it required an active role of all participating laboratories, assured participation of staff from national metrology institutions, all national accreditation bodies, and was supported by national quality infrastructures, such as standardization, governmental institutions etc. in the entire Western Balkans region. The activities stimulated progress in the area of conformity assessment, added knowledge to the implementation of technical directives and development of the technical part of national legislation and therefore facilitated the process toward the accession to the European Union. The main objective was therefore to organize proficiency testing in those sectors (construction, consumer protection and environment) that were vital in the pre-accession process of countries seeking full implementation of EU technical legislation.     

Surveys on the accreditation of providers of proficiency testing and external quality assessment schemes

Two surveys among providers of proficiency testing (PT) and external quality assessment (EQA) schemes were carried out during 2004 and 2005. The main objectives were to explore the current status of accreditation/certification and collect the providers’ views. Information based on the response from 160 providers in 32 countries reveals a strong tendency towards accreditation of PT/EQA. It is shown that this type of accreditation is based on several combinations of normative documents, hence illustrating a lack of harmonisation of national accreditation bodies. The surveys also show that schemes are operated under considerably different conditions and that providers’ competence may or may not be underpinned by other certification and/or accreditation. This paper elaborates on a number of issues related to PT/EQA accreditation, including customers’ views, normative documents, providers’ experience from the accreditation process, views expressed by international organisations, and effects of accreditation on participation fees, quality and availability.     

The accreditation of reference material producers — EUROLAB's position

A third-party assessment of reference materials (RMs) and their production is not of the highest priority for RM users. But if RM producers do want a third-party involvement this should be realised within the frame of existing conformity assessment schemes. Nevertheless, the right and responsibility of the laboratories to select the most appropriate RMs for their tasks must not be restricted by accreditation bodies or other interested parties.     

Accreditation in analytical laboratories: a critical assessment of its impact on human beings and techniques

Summary The relationships between Quality, Quality Assurance and Third Party Approval by accreditation based on formal application of EN 29002, EN 45001 and ISO Guide 25 are briefly outlined for analytical chemical laboratories working in the non-regulated area. The roles of human beings in laboratories and accreditation bodies are discussed and recommendations are made on how to minimize friction during accreditation processes. The structures of the European Accreditation Systems are reviewed and the efforts towards mutual recognition of the national accreditation bodies are described and critically assessed. The lack of competition based on free market conditions in the framework of company law is deplored. The assessment of laboratory systems, rather than assessing the activity of laboratories against technical standards, is recommended (unless it is otherwise requested). The beneficial effects of the process of accreditation on competence and quality of the activity of the laboratory are emphasized.     

Laboratory accreditation: The operation of an established scheme

NAMAS, the National Measurement Accreditation Service, was formed in 1985 and has currently accredited some 1050 testing and calibration laboratories in the United Kingdom. NAMAS is managed by an Executive of 60 staff which is based at the National Physical Laboratory, one the UK's largest Government Research Establishments. Laboratories seeking accreditation are assessed by fully trained technical experts contracted by NAMAS, against the criteria set out in the NAMAS Accreditation Standard M10; the criteria contained in this document are fully consistent with the international standards for laboratory accreditation EN 45001 and ISO Guide 25. NAMAS has recently published a document which provides guidance on the interpretation of the NAMAS Accreditation Standard for analytical laboratories. Assessment involves a consultative preassessment visit which is followed by a thorough on-site assessment of a laboratory's quality system and testing activities by a team of expert assessors. Following the correction of any noncompliances found at the assessment, the laboratory receives a certificate of accreditation and a schedule which defines those tests and analyses for which the laboratory is accredited. NAMAS has negotiated a number of mutual recognition agreements with similar accreditation bodies in other countries and negotiations with other schemes are underway. The imminent approach of the European Single Market has highlighted the need for independent third party assurance of testing and calibration and this should ensure the continued growth of NAMAS and similar schemes elsewhere in Europe.     

Certification of reference materials and accreditation of reference material producers: Questionable terminology leads to confusion

In the view of the Deutscher Kalibrierdienst (DKD) , a certifying body for reference materials can be considered to be a calibration laboratory. Therefore, accreditation of calibration laboratories in accordance with ISO/IEC 17025 is the most appropriate way to establish confidence in certificates for reference materials. If necessary, the criteria of ISO/IEC 17025 can be tailored to specific cases. There is no need to provide any new kind of reference-material specific accreditation. However, in view of the variety of reference materials and the practice existing in other countries, accreditation of testing laboratories and product certification bodies may optionally be acceptable as long as the same stringent principles with respect to traceability and measurement uncertainty are applied. Such accreditations but not accreditations of reference material producers (ISO Guide 34) are also covered by existing international mutual recognition arrangements (MRA).     

Analysis of the relationships between proficiency testing,validation of methods and estimation of measurement uncertainty: a qualitative study with experts

Proficiency testing (PT) is an important part in the process ensuring quality of results. Validation of methods and estimation of measurement uncertainty are also vital elements in a laboratory qualification process. The main objective of this paper is to identify the relationships between PT, validation of methods and calculation of measurement uncertainty through the drawing up of a Mind Map. The method proposed used the Web-based Delphi method to conduct a qualitative research with experts of the area (laboratory assessors and accreditation body members). Experts from five accreditation bodies (Brazil, USA, France, Portugal and China) took part in the research. The study led to the drawing up of a Mind Map showing the connections of cause and effect between the factors under study. It emerged that PT effectively contributes to the reliability of results, since it is directly related to the validation of methods and to measurement uncertainty, so as to increase laboratory’s competitiveness.     

Laboratory authorization versus accreditation in transitional economies: case study of Serbia

Many CEE governments are still using various systems of laboratory authorization together with ISO/IEC 17025 laboratory accreditation. It is difficult to understand from the EU prospective, the existence of two parallel laboratory competence verification systems. The basic relations between laboratory accreditation and authorization: independence and succession have been defined. The case study of testing laboratory accreditation versus authorization in Serbia, has been presented and discussed. Relevant requests and procedures for water quality, food and air quality testing laboratory authorization were analysed in detail. Comparative analyses of accreditation and authorization have established: (i) independent relations, (ii) relevant regulation is in collision and barely legal, (iii) authorization is (technically) on the far lower level than accreditation is, and (iv) authorization requests cause high space and personnel costs. It has been concluded that it is not adequate to perform two policies at the same time: one EU oriented—laboratory accreditation, and one non-EU oriented—laboratory authorization. The policy proposal is that all CEE countries should abandon existing laboratory authorization procedures and replace them by accreditation. Proposed goal could be reached in rather a short transition process of 2–3 years.     

The ILAC Arrangement – Part I

As of August 2001, 38 laboratory accreditation bodies of the International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (ILAC) have signed the multi-lateral, mutual recognition arrangement (the ”ILAC Arrangement”) to promote the acceptance of accredited test and calibration data. This Arrangement provides significant technical underpinning to international trade. Until now, there has been no international mutual recognition agreement in laboratory accreditation, which has been a hindrance for some types of international trade. The key to the Arrangement is the developing global network of accredited testing and calibration laboratories that are assessed and recognised as being competent by ILAC Arrangement signatory accreditation bodies. The signatories have, in turn, been peer-reviewed and shown to meet ILAC’s criteria for competence. Now that the ILAC Arrangement is in place, governments can take advantage of it to further develop or enhance trade agreements. The ultimate aim is increased use and acceptance by industry, as well as government, of the results from accredited laboratories, including results from laboratories in other countries. In this way, the free-trade goal of ”a product tested once and accepted everywhere” can be realised.