Third‐grade teachers’ self‐reported use of multiplication and division models

Visual representations and manipulatives are a highly advocated mathematical tool for the teaching and learning of multiplication and division. Although there is some prior research on elementary teachers’ general use of manipulatives and visual representations, there is little to no specific focus on use of such representations on a specific mathematical concept. The present study examined third grade teachers’ reported use of visual representations for teaching multiplication and division. Findings indicate prevalent use of discrete models and infrequent use of continuous models. Length models and number lines are rarely used across all Common Core standards focusing on multiplication/division, with numeric‐only representations being reported frequently across all standards. Groups‐of and array models were the most prevalent visual model reported by third grade teachers. Although teachers report higher degrees of access to certain materials than previous reports on manipulative use, interview data suggests this may have more to do with purchase agreements between school districts and textbook companies than pedagogical preferences of classroom teachers. Supporting findings in prior decades, teachers in the present study report prevalent use of flashcards, charts and grid paper, and variations of counters.     

High school students' use of representations in physics problem solving

Findings from physics education research strongly point to the critical need for teachers’ use of multiple representations in their instructional practices such as pictures, diagrams, written explanations, and mathematical expressions to enhance students' problem‐solving ability. In this study, we explored use of problem‐solving tasks for generating multiple representations as a scaffolding strategy in a high school modeling physics class. Through problem‐solving cognitive interviews with students, we investigated how a group of students responded to the tasks and how their use of such strategies affected their problem‐solving performance and use of representations as compared to students who did not receive explicit, scaffolded guidance to generate representations in solving similar problems. Aggregated data on students' problem‐solving performance and use of representations were collected from a set of 14 mechanics problems and triangulated with cognitive interviews. A higher percentage of students from the scaffolding group constructed visual representations in their problem‐solving solutions, while their use of other representations and problem‐solving performance did not differ with that of the comparison group. In addition, interviews revealed that students did not think that writing down physics concepts was necessary despite being encouraged to do so as a support strategy.     

Transformations in the Visual Representation of a Figural Pattern

Multiple representations of a given mathematical object/concept are one of the biggest difficulties encountered by students. The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of the use of visual representations in teaching and learning algebra. In this paper, we analyze the transformations from and to visual representations that were performed by 18 students (aged between 10 and 13) in a task designed to explore a figural pattern. The data were collected from an audio recording of the class, the students’ work, and the teacher’s notes about each lesson. The results confirm that visual representations are important. However, visual treatments of any kind of representation are decisive, since they give students other possibilities for seeing and understanding tasks, continuity and flexibility in their activities, and the ability to make conversions between representations. The creative realization of visual treatments is necessary, and the teacher has a significant role in helping students to learn how to do this.     

Identifying Fourth Graders' Understanding of Rational Number Representations: A Mixed Methods Approach

This study examined average‐, high‐ and top‐performing US fourth graders' rational number problem solving and their understanding of rational number representations. In phase one, all students completed a written test designed to tap their skills for multiplication, division and rational number word‐problem solving. In phase two, a subset of students sorted cards that showed part‐whole, ratio, quotient, measure, and operator perspectives of rational number representations. Each perspective was shown in numerical notational, word‐problem, and visual formats. The results indicated that top‐performing students scored significantly higher in problem solving and showed more effectively linked rational number representations than the other groups. The results imply that successful rational number problem solving is intertwined with representational knowledge for a wide range of rational numbers and that the bulk of US students do not possess effective skills for working with rational number representations.     

Conceptual Limitations in Curricular Presentations of Area Measurement: One Nation’s Challenges

Research has found that elementary students face five main challenges in learning area measurement: (1) conserving area as a quantity, (2) understanding area units, (3) structuring rectangular space into composite units, (4) understanding area formulas, and (5) distinguishing area and perimeter. How well do elementary mathematics curricula address these challenges? A detailed analysis of three U.S. elementary textbook series revealed systematic deficits. Each presented area measurement in strongly procedural terms using a shared sequence of procedures across grades. Key conceptual principles were infrequently expressed and often well after related procedures were introduced. Particularly weak support was given for understanding how the multiplication of lengths produces area measures. The results suggest that the content of written curricula contributes to students’ weak learning of area measurement.     

Making Connections: Elementary Teachers' Construction of Division Word Problems and Representations

If teachers make few connections among multiple representations of division, supporting students in using representations to develop operation sense demanded by national standards will not occur. Studies have investigated how prospective and practicing teachers use representations to develop knowledge of fraction division. However, few studies examined primary (K‐3) teachers' learning of contextual division problems, making connections among representations of division, and resolving the ambiguity of representing quotients with remainders. A written post‐course assessment provided evidence that most teachers created partitive division word problems, used a set model without splitting the remainder, and wrote equations with limited success. Post‐course written reflections demonstrated that many teachers developed pedagogical knowledge for helping students make connections among multiple representations, and mathematical knowledge of unit fractions. These findings suggest two areas that have implications for mathematics teacher educators who design professional development courses to facilitate teachers' learning of mathematical content and pedagogical knowledge of division and fraction relationships.     

How Students “Unpack” the Structure of a Word Problem: Graphic Representations and Problem Solving

This research investigated how fourth and fifth grade students spontaneously ‘unpacked’ a word problem when generating a graphic representation to aid in problem solution. Relationships among the type of graphic representation produced, spatial visualization, drawing ability, gender, and problem solving also were examined and described. Instrumentation developed for the study included several math challenge tasks, a spatial visualization task, and a drawing task. For one of the math challenge tasks, students were instructed to draw a picture to assist them with problem solution. These graphic representations generated by students were rated as pictorial or as displaying some level of schematic representation. Schematic representations included germane information from the problem supportive of problem solution. Pictorial representations included expressive and extraneous elements not necessary for problem solution, with no schematic elements. Findings indicated that the majority of students rendered schematic representations, with girls more likely than boys to use schematic representations at a statistically significant level. Students who used schematic visual representations were more successful problem solvers than those pictorially representing problem elements. The more “schematic‐like” the visual representation, the more successful students were at problem solution. Drawing a pictorial representation in the math challenge task also was negatively correlated to drawing skill.     

Preservice elementary teachers’ knowledge for teaching the associative property of multiplication: A preliminary analysis

This study examines preservice elementary teachers’ (PTs) knowledge for teaching the associative property (AP) of multiplication. Results reveal that PTs hold a common misconception between the AP and commutative property (CP). Most PTs in our sample were unable to use concrete contexts (e.g., pictorial representations and word problems) to illustrate AP of multiplication conceptually, particularly due to a fragile understanding of the meaning of multiplication. The study also revealed that the textbooks used by PTs at both the university and elementary levels do not provide conceptual support for teaching AP of multiplication. Implications of findings are discussed.     

Investigating Elementary Mathematics Curricula: Focus on Students With Learning Disabilities

The purpose of this study was to investigate three elementary mathematics curricula to examine the accessibility for students with learning disabilities (LD) with regards to challenges associated with working memory. We chose to focus on students' experiences when finding the area of composite shapes due to the multiple steps involved for solving these problems and the potential for these problems to tax working memory. We conducted a qualitative analysis of how each curriculum provided opportunities for students with LD to engage with these problems. During our analysis, we focused on instruction that emphasized visual representations (e.g., manipulatives, drawings, and diagrams), facilitated mathematical conversations, and developed cognitive and metacognitive skills. Our findings indicated a need for practitioners to consider how each curriculum provides instruction for storage and organization of information as well as how each curriculum develops students' thinking processes and conceptual understanding of mathematics. We concluded that all three curricula provide potentially effective strategies for teaching students with LD to solve multi‐step problems, such as area of composite shapes problems, but teachers using any of these curricula will likely need to supplement the curriculum to meet the needs of students with LD.     

Learning to represent,representing to learn

This study explores how students learn to create, discuss, and reason with representations to solve problems. A summer school algebra class for seventh and eighth graders provided opportunities for students to create and use representations as problem-solving tools. This case study follows the learning trajectories of three boys. Two of the three boys had been low-achievers in their previous math classes, and one was a high achiever. Analysis of all three boys’ written work reveals how their representations became more sophisticated over time. Their small group interactions while problem-solving also show changes in how they communicated and reasoned with representations. For these boys, representation functioned as a learning practice. Through constructing and reasoning with representations, the boys were able to engage in generalizing and justifying claims, discuss quadratic growth, and collaborate and persist in problem-solving. Negotiating different student-constructed representations of a problem also gave them opportunities to act with agency, as they made choices and judgments about the validity of the different perspectives. These findings have implications for the importance of giving all students access to mathematics through representations, with representational thinking serving as a central disciplinary practice and as a learning practice that supports further mathematics learning.     

Exploring high-achieving sixth grade students’ erroneous answers and misconceptions on the angle concept

The aim of this research was to investigate high achievers’ erroneous answers and misconceptions on the angle concept. The participants consisted of 233 grade 6 students drawn from eight classes in two well-established elementary schools of Trabzon, Turkey. All the participants were considered to be current achievers in mathematics, graded 4 or 5 out of 5, and selected via a purposive sampling method. Data were collected through six questions reflecting the learning competencies set out in the grade 6 curriculum in Turkey and the findings of previous studies that aimed to identify students’ misconceptions of the angle concept. This questionnaire was then applied over a 40-minute period in each class. The findings were analysed by two researchers whose inter-rater agreement was computed as 0.97, or almost perfect. Thereafter, coding discrepancies were resolved, and consensus was established. We found that although the participants in this study were high achievers, they still held several misconceptions on the angle concept such as recognizing a straight angle or a right angle in different orientations. We also show how some of these misconceptions could have arisen due to the definitions or representations used in the textbook, and offer suggestions concerning their content in the future.     

Exploring US textbooks’ treatment of the estimation of linear measurements

Learning to estimate a linear measurement is critical in becoming a successful measurer. Research indicates that the teaching of the estimation of linear measurement is quite open and that instruction does not make explicit to students how to carry out estimation work. Because written curriculum has been identified as one of the main sources affecting teachers’ instruction and students’ learning, this study examined how estimation of linear measurement tasks were presented to students in three US elementary mathematics curricula to see how much and in what ways these tasks were presented in an open manner. The principal result was that the length estimation tasks were frequently not explicit about which attribute of the object to measure and the requested level of precision of the estimate. Length estimation tasks were also left more open than other measurement tasks like measuring length with rulers.     

Prospective Elementary Teachers’ Understanding of Order of Operations

This study investigates how well 381 prospective elementary, early childhood, and special education majors solved four arithmetic problems that required using the order of operations. Self‐reported data show these students to be relatively able mathematically and confident in their ability, with no substantial dislike of mathematics. The percentage of answers that were incorrect that is attributable to order of operations ranged from 21.7% to 78.5%. Overall, fewer than half the subjects answered more than two questions correctly. Of those subjects who performed multiplication before addition, which indicates some knowledge of order of operations, 30.9% performed addition before subtraction and 38.0% performed multiplication before division rather than from left to right, which suggests that instead of using the correct order of operations, these students used the common mnemonic PEMDAS or “Please excuse my dear Aunt Sally “literally, performing multiplication before division and performing addition before subtraction, rather than from left‐to‐right. Furthermore, 78.5% of subjects used the incorrect order of operations to compute ?3².     

A coloured window on pre-service teachers’ conceptions of rational numbers

In undergraduate mathematics courses, pre-service elementary school teachers are often faced with the task of re-learning some of the concepts they themselves struggled with in their own schooling. This often involves different cognitive processes and psychological issues than initial learning: pre-service teachers have had many more opportunities to construct understandings and representations than initial learners, some of which may be more complex and engrained; pre-service teachers are likely to have created deeply-held–and often negative–beliefs and attitudes toward certain mathematical ideas and processes. In our recent research, we found that pre-service teachers who used a particular computer-based microworld, one emphasising visual representations of and experimental interactions with elementary number theory concepts, overcame many cognitive and psychological difficulties reported in the literature. In this study, we investigate the possibilities of using a similarly-designed microworld that involves a set of rational number concepts. We describe the affordances of this microworld, both in terms of pre-service teacher learning and research on pre-service teacher learning, namely, the helpful “window” it gave us on the mathematical meaning-making of pre-service teachers. We also show how their interactions with this microworld provided many with a new and aesthetically-rich set of visualisations and experiences.     

Number Worlds: Visual and Experimental Access to Elementary Number Theory Concepts

Recent research demonstrates that many issues related to the structure of natural numbers and the relationship among numbers are not well grasped by students. In this article, we describe a computer-based learning environment called Number Worlds that was designed to support the exploration of elementary number theory concepts by making the essential relationships and patterns more accessible to learners. Based on our research with pre-service elementary school teachers, we show how both the visual representations embedded in the microworld, and the possibilities afforded for experimentation affect learners' understanding and appreciation of basic concepts in elementary number theory. We also discuss the aesthetic and affective dimensions of the research participants' engagement with the learning environment. This revised version was published online in July 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Students’ conceptualisations of multiplication as repeated addition or equal groups in relation to multi-digit and decimal numbers

Multiplicative understanding is essential for mathematics learning and is supported by models for multiplication, such as equal groups and rectangular area, different calculations and arithmetical properties, such as distributivity. We investigated two students’ multiplicative understanding through their connections between models for multiplication, calculations and arithmetical properties and how their connections changed during the school years when multiplication is extended to multi-digits and decimal numbers. The case studies were conducted by individual interviews over five semesters. The students did not connect calculations to models for multiplication, but showed a robust conceptualisation of multiplication as repeated addition or equal groups. This supported their utilisation of distributivity to multi-digits, but constrained their utilisation of commutativity and for one student to make sense of decimal multiplication     

The missing link in teachers’ knowledge about common fractions division

The current study explored the difficulties teachers encounter when teaching common fractions division, focusing on teachers’ knowledge concerning this issue. Nine teachers who study towards a M.Ed. degree in mathematics education demonstrated the algorithms they apply in order to solve fractions division problems, described how they teach the subject, and attempted to explain a student's mistake, in understanding a word problem involving dividing by fraction. The findings indicate there is a missing link in the teachers’ pedagogical capability, stemming from insufficient content knowledge. They presented different solution algorithms and reported using constructivist teaching methods, yet the methods they described couldn't lead a student to understand the logic behind the algorithm they teach (invert-and-multiply – multiplication by an inverse number, in accordance with the requirements of the curriculum). Furthermore, the participating teachers did not possess specialized mathematics content knowledge (SCK) and knowledge of content and students (KCS), enabling them to identify the source of a student's misconception.     

Fundamental Fraction Knowledge of Preservice Elementary Teachers: A Cross‐National Study in the United States and Taiwan

The purpose of this paper is to show the similarities as well as the differences of fundamental fraction knowledge owned by preservice elementary teachers from the United States (N= 89) and Taiwan (N= 85). To this end, we examined and compared their performance on an instrument including 15 multiple‐choice test items. The items were categorized into four different types of fundamental fraction constructs, including part–whole relationship, quotient, equivalence, and meanings of operations. Each item was embedded in the area, linear, or set model except for the items constructed out of the meaning of operations. Several items were featured with a pictorial illustration. Quantitative analysis showed that U.S. preservice teachers were significantly outperformed by their Taiwanese counterparts overall. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant on 12 of 15 items. Findings suggest that preservice elementary teachers from both countries need to be better prepared in their understanding of the meaning of fraction multiplication or division operations. Findings also suggest that U.S. preservice elementary teachers need to be more knowledgeable in dealing with fraction problems embedded in a linear model. Further research is suggested to study the issues raised from the findings.     

Concept Development of Decimals in Chinese Elementary Students: A Conceptual Change Approach

The aim of this study was to examine the concept development of decimal numbers in 244 Chinese elementary students in grades 4–6. Three grades of students differed in their intuitive sense of decimals and conceptual understanding of decimals, with more strategic approaches used by older students. Misconceptions regarding the density nature of decimals indicated the progress in an ascending spiral trend (i.e., fourth graders performed the worst; fifth graders performed the best; and sixth graders regressed slightly), not in a linear trend. Misconceptions regarding decimal computation (i.e., multiplication makes bigger) generally decreased across grades. However, children's misconceptions regarding the density and infinity features of decimals appeared to be more persistent than misconceptions regarding decimal computation. Some students in higher grades continued to use the discreteness feature of whole numbers to explain the distance between two decimal numbers, indicating an intermediate level of understanding decimals. The findings revealed the effect of symbolic representation of interval end points and students' responses were contingent on the actual representations of interval end points. Students in all three grades demonstrated narrowed application of decimal values (e.g., merchandise), and their application of decimals was largely limited by their learning experiences.     

Using narrative inquiry for investigating the becoming of a mathematics teacher

This article presents narrative inquiry as a method for research in mathematics education, in particular the study of how pre-service teachers’ views of mathematics develop during elementary teacher education. I describe two different, complementary approaches to applying narrative analysis, one focusing on the content of a narrative, the other focusing on the form. The examples discussed are taken from interviews with and teaching portfolios compiled by four pre-service teachers. In analysing the content of the students’ narratives, I use emplotment to construct a retrospective explanation of how one pre-service teacher’s own experiences at school were reflected in the development of her mathematical identity. In analysing the form of the narratives, I also look at how the students told their stories, using linguistic features, for example, to identify core events in the accounts. This particular focus seems to be promising in locating turning points in the trainees’ views of mathematics.